RealiTTY: Information and Simulated Reality

[Holographicillusion]

@Holoplexproductions okay never mind thanks but what are you doing currently ? Making a new series like Reality or Syzgy and do you have a website ?

[HoloplexProductions]

@Holographicillusion "Netonomy" will be out soon, looking at network era economics, peer production, social currency, commons, social enterprise, collaborative consumption etc. My website is miles . thenewhive . com

[Holographicillusion]

@Holoplexproduction gentlemen your link is not working on my cell isnt it possible to put those scripts back on your website also why have you removed the other videos of Realitty for ex Inauthencity of science , hyperdimensional reality and synchromysticism etc. from your playlist.

[HoloplexProductions]

@Holographicillusion I don't run the server anymore. I removed some of the videos because I think they are misleading and detract from other videos in the series. You can still find the deleted videos on torrents if you search google for "RealiTTY torrent"

[Holographicillusion]

@Holoplexproductions i use a cell so i cant access 13.8 MB file from scribd of RealiTTY. I remember last year you had a website it had the transcripts of all your videos of RealiTTY. Can you please put that back on your website Or can you please email me the pdf converted text.

[HoloplexProductions]

@Holographicillusion Try here: bit . ly/zLaLtQ

I would be surprised if that renders OK on a cellphone so if it doesn't work let me know and I'll message you.

[TheWayshowerTube]

I love digital physics!

[terransage]

As much as I rejected this theory at first (because it kind of scared me), I'm leaning in this direction more and more. I create computer games and interactives and realized that scripting (coding) has its own "physics" or physical laws (it can communicate instantaneously with objects many virtual miles apart--like quantum entanglement), while the physics of the virtual game world doesn't allow for speeds faster than light, so to speak. Then there is also third physics, that of the player....

[HoloplexProductions]

@terransage Yep, know what mean and as I commented on another video of mine that as we get closer to the technological singularity the more simulism would appear to become an empirical reality. The simulation (we're hypothetically in) needn't run in "real-time" either for example if it is running on a hypercomputer. In theory when quantum computers finally arrive we should be able to test what has previously been untestable.

[XxXPachy05XxX]

tl;dr

[FalseFlagAmerican]

This is quite the thought generator. Thanks for posting. I'm going to embed & promulgate through my networks.

Namaste.

[AussieTruthSeeker]

Thank you. This is brilliant. :))

[shaggar70]

2012 when humans become self aware:)always good to hear TMK.

[G0ttaBeFresh]

Digital physics has the most scientific evidence backing it's theories than anything else. This has to be the answer to everything.

[HoloplexProductions]

@G0ttaBeFresh I agree, but would also add the caution that we are trapped within linguistic concepts, it would appear that Digital Physics explains everything, but we cannot get at absolute truth we can only create abstractions. We can never know 100% if there is any information which cannot be processed, our thinking about the universe/reality is not the thing in/of itself, just a subset. Some may say that Advaita Vedānta is the answer to everything, it depends on the metaphors one is using.

[G0ttaBeFresh]

@HoloplexProductions But do you think there is an experiment in the future that could prove or disprove our reality? Maybe when we have more understanding of physics and consciousness?

[HoloplexProductions]

@G0ttaBeFresh Whatever "the experiment" is, is the universe. All we can really do is identify fractal patterns, as above, so below.

[vessmore]

@G0ttaBeFresh

If we can measure that Time and Space are quantized, it would be a good

indication that we are living in a simulation.

[HoloplexProductions]

@vessmore plank length / plank time

[vessmore]

@HoloplexProductions

But let us asume the Planck-length is correct, how many bits would it take to

position a particle in the known universe. A fast roughly calculation says 3*200 bits, not much,

but there is a lot of particles in space

[G0ttaBeFresh]

@vessmore I think that there is an algorithm that can link everything together on a quantum level. It would be like a script or a program for our reality. Like Fibonacci sequence but for T.O.E.

[Appertunity]

Digital physics

[insanewarlock666]

It's a good theory but on another hand it's delusional LOL

[HoloplexProductions]

@insanewarlock666 and that's what makes it so beautifully insane and insanely beautiful... xD

[insanewarlock666]

@HoloplexProductions however beautiful does not mean true, unless you're a wishful thinker like all those retarded Christians :D

[HoloplexProductions]

@insanewarlock666 true is only true while true which can never be proven

[insanewarlock666]

@HoloplexProductions maybe Flying Spaghetti Monster is an onliest true god and he is the one who created universe, who knows? what good reasons are there to assert that? NONE

[HoloplexProductions]

@insanewarlock666 The greatest of life skills is the ability to live with ambiguity, ambivalence, and paradox, without trying to regularize these uncertainties into finished, absolute truths

[insanewarlock666]

@HoloplexProductions so greatest skill in this live is self-deception? good idea, I'll try it out.

If you see me on TV murdering people to get 40 virgins in heaven promise that you'll take responsibility on yourself ok? otherwise I'm not sure you believe in what are you saying...

[HoloplexProductions]

@insanewarlock666 true knowledge is knowing that you know nothing

[insanewarlock666]

@HoloplexProductions Socrates said that though, one who used to ridicule superstitious beliefs...

[HoloplexProductions]

@insanewarlock666 I have no superstitious beliefs, the fact remains that life will forever remain a mystery because the universe is never fully present to us. The people who think they have got it all figured out are in fact the most deluded and superstitious.

[insanewarlock666]

@HoloplexProductions actually abiogenesis is not proven right YET so no one claims to understand the origins of life (I'm talking about scientists) but it's very likely that we will figure that out within this century. and by the way empirical method is not a superstition LOL it's radically opposite

[HoloplexProductions]

@insanewarlock666 there is no proof, only different interpretations, there are no signifieds only signifiers, everything is a process self-becoming. Are you the thought or the thinker? The empirical method hits the wall of subjectivity which it cannot subsume. A theory is only true when it does not reduce the irreducible, theory is anti-theory.

[insanewarlock666]

@HoloplexProductions ok there are things that can never be known for example did we exist 5 minutes ago or our mind were programed 4 minutes ago to think that way? it's unknowable! however there ARE things that are knowable watch this video /watch?v=5wV_REEdvxo

[HoloplexProductions]

@insanewarlock666 good video, yes I have an apophatic view regarding religion and ontology. However the suggestions being made of what is not in the cube are all purely symbolic/abstract. Isn't it simply language games that we are playing here? I agree there has to be some internal self-consistency to what someone is saying, however all "measurability" breaks down into incompleteness because there are no "things" out there. It is all hide and seek as Alan Watts puts it.

[insanewarlock666]

@HoloplexProductions "yes I have an apophatic view regarding religion and ontology."

so you don't regard this theory (that we live in a simulated reality) as an ontology O_o

"Isn't it simply language games that we are playing here?"

actually one dimensional cube (my favorite one) is not a language game it's a mathematical claim that can be proven wrong.

[HoloplexProductions]

@insanewarlock666 no, I realize that every theory is a story, that everything is symbolic. You can only see a story for what it is when you are outside the story. Math is symbol, are there "numbers" in nature?

[insanewarlock666]

@HoloplexProductions "are there "numbers" in nature?"

LOL you should not be asking that question, is it not you who believes world is digital?

[HoloplexProductions]

@insanewarlock666 that is your conjecture not mine, I have already told you I do not believe this. Anything I say becomes a symbol, I can call it language or information, it really doesn't matter the point is as soon as mind is described it is no longer mind.

[ParkwayDriveHorizons]

Tom Cambell's lecture included in this presentation is on YT and very much recommended to those interested in advanced metaphysics (My Big Toe).

I also recommend The Universe Solved by Jim Elvidge.

[EMAN360ELITE]

A simulated reality is the most scientifically feasible approach at abolishing human suffering by transfer of consciousness to a supercomputer. However, it is highly unlikely that a civilization that possesses this level of ability would waste the amount of computation that our reality requires for accurate simulation and representation. The reality we are familiar with is far far too complex to assume an intelligent agent is implementing it through simulation.

[pupydejz]

there is one reality

[pootnikalexander]

When not distracted by the finger pointing one sees the moon. All is consciousness...what a wonderful mystery. Information can be hacked.

[AgapeTruebookDotOrg]

Love it Miles! your da man!

[HoloplexProductions]

@AgapeTruebookDotOrg Just trying to make sense of things dude, not that I am any more clued up then anyone else. I would love to learn more about sacred geometry, but kinda short on leisure time right now.

[AgapeTruebookDotOrg]

@HoloplexProductions I know, but some of the information reflects the research which many of us have not done in the depth as you did which does not mean you are superior:) I am just thnkaful for your work that you are doing for us:)

[sterilecat]

how do you make the jump in saying that consciousness is at the lower end of resolution?

[HoloplexProductions]

@sterilecat How do you mean? What quote exactly are your referring to?

[HoloplexProductions]

@HoloplexProductions Ahh I think I know, the analogy that I give is referring to the idea of consciousness being embedded within a series of virtual machines. What I am saying is that while we may be unable to distinguish between "reality" and "virtual reality", any simulation of reality will be computationally less powerful the more "virtual machines" it passes through, there is less decision space that it can emulate.

[sterilecat]

@HoloplexProductions thanks for clearing that up, i was just realizing what you where saying as a when back and checked it out. thanks for this synthesizing this!!!!. adding godels incompleteness theorem our consciousness is outside any and all systems.

[Cruiz954]

@sterilecat not meaning tht our consciousness is of inferior origins, he is simply saying tht we are at the lower end of a very higher spectrum. basically tht we are at the product of our true selves, which in fact is at a higher frequency or wave length.

[sterilecat]

@Cruiz954 indeed yet that higher frequency, this source field frequency our non-physical higher self, gives rise to and rides with all of creation every where every when, we are a product of our true selves and expressing that true self in the here now no? the very bases of any and all creation is this source field which is the most abundant thing in the universe for it is the universe itself as well as being the greatest source of information and energy. we are literally made up of it

[WarzSchoolchild]

"A Cybernetic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" (Ross Rhodes) ,,,An informative introduction to the conceots.

[HoloplexProductions]

@WarzSchoolchild Thanks, reading it now =]

Have you read Seth Lloyds book -

scribd . com, search for "Programming the Universe"

[daizee106]

Is there more??

[HoloplexProductions]

@daizee106 This video series is based on my book over at wwww realiTTY (dot) tk

There are 14 more parts to be rendered/uploaded but I don't have the time to work on them right now