Added: 2 years ago
From: rucksack76
Views: 31,666
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (163)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol

  • @bloboshitful good one...

  • Loved, loved this film.

  • im on siskels side here. ebert tries to filibuster to no avail.

  • I guess Ebert boogied on down to JAW REMOVAL room of the hospital LOL

  • Ebert always shits all over Siskel. Rightly so.

  • Drug deal gone bad scene is definitely a masterpiece! Sister Christian kicked it off! Booyah! That's real rock & roll!!!

  • This film is a masterpiece.

  • ebert is right. that drug scene with the firecrackers is some of the best film i have ever seen. i cant take my eyes off it.

  • Ebert=Ugly

    Fans=Losers

  • Lol being a porn star is just about as pointless as being a film critic. Actually being a porn star probably has a greater function then being a film critic.

  • @themi90 And you will never be either a porn star or a film critic. Your look alike is Roger Ebert

  • @kellygreen5556 I am a adult film actor already. Now dont you feel stupid.

  • @themi90 Bull.

  • Nina Hartley, mmm hmmm.

  • What's the point? It's about finding that one thing you're good at and sticking to it. Dirk Diggler is such a worthless human being he can never rise above what he is, which is a porn star. Everyone else in Jack Horner's extended "family" is able to move beyond that existence, but not Dirk because all his talent rests in his johnson. But even at his lowest point, he always has his family to fall back on. I'm surprised Siskel failed to glean the message, he was usually much more perceptive.

  • well your opinion sucks siskel,,but your dead so who gives a fuck..lol

  • I agree whole-heartedly with Siskel

  • Ebert got it. All I needed to know.

  • Great Great film

  • After watching Boogie Nights the film tells me that the porno industry is big lonely business.

  • wheres the rest?!

  • Wow, BOOGIE on down with your way cool idol fatso Ebert and look at tired shows

  • i love how ebert loves the firecracker scene part.

  • I loved it when they disagreed.

  • These guys inspired the millions of film geeks arguing online about movies on a daily basis, me included.

  • How is it that Siskel is a film critic when he doesn't know anything about films??

  • @sparkyinbath ... What?

  • @sparkyinbath Was a film critic.

  • @mjbab73

    ding ding ding

  • A great film :).

  • rapsinger, my ass

  • Gene Siskel is wrong that it's "not all that significant". I mean, from the long opening shot to other interesting shots, the touching comedy, the bravery and the great acting participants - and Roger Ebert knows it. Great movie that is also entertaining that really stands out and stays with you years after.

  • The best film of the 90's. Burt Reynolds deserved the Oscar, but unfortunately lost to Robin Williams in the formulaic Good Will Hunting.

  • @ophs1980 Good Will Hunting being formulaic had nothing to do with Robin Williams' outstanding performance. I love Boogie Nights, but I don't think Reynolds was as good as Williams.

  • If I got a dollar for every time they pointlessly use a long take in this film I'd be able to make a remake of this film :)

  • @xaxie1 oxymoron dude, theres no such thing as a pointless long take

  • @xaxie1 Symboliclly speaking, the many long shots used in this film are meant to convey not only the distance that these people have from the "normal" world but also the emotional detachment that they have to maintain from themselves in order to function in a dehumanizing business.

  • @blaporte79 Siskel annoyed the shit out of me almost every time.

  • Though I don't really agree with Roger, I have to admit he pretty much deconstructs Gene's criticisms of the film.

    And though I do agree that this was a pretty good film about 'seamy' subject matter, I always felt it was a bit overrated.

    I think I've got to go back and watch it again......enough time has probably passed to be able to now see this for what it really is, whether good, or bad.

  • One of the best films back then and even now in my top 10....awesome movie

  • I love Siskel and all but, boy, his tendency of being prudish seeped into his criticisms way too often. Thank god Ebert is an atheist lol.

  • A fight...even though they give it two thumbs up. A fight over quality. Too funny.

  • I love how it just fades out to the two of them arguing

  • Its one of the best films of the 90s.... if not the best !

  • They need to learn debate etiquette. Let each other talk for once...

  • Guys! Guys! C'mon now, can't we all just get along?

  • I forgot what total boneheads these 2 were.

  • If Gene Siskel (r.i.p)  was still alive, I wonder what he thought about each of the harry potter movies?.

  • 3:19 siskel is like "shit, he's right"

  • @corionzielig Really? lol.

  • @corionzielig I am not 31. You must be one stupid fuck to believe ages in Youtube profiles.

  • @corionzielig I am not 31. You must be one stupid fuck to believe ages in Youtube profiles.

  • They both missed the major point that this film is about family. They all came from bad family lives and became a new family with Burt Reynolds as the father and Moore as the mother. The new family falls apart but at the end they all come back together and redeem themselves.

  • I really appreciate Siskel's opinions, but it's times like these (and with his reviews of Aliens and Full Metal Jacket, for example) that I must side with Ebert. Honestly, Ebert's right a bit more often than Siskel, no disrespect.

  • ebert is a loser like his ugly fans

  • Guys did you know Roger Ebert is an android now?

  • @MajBlood and you are a troll who has stated he is 31 and a student. Get a job

  • @RottenJaws What the fuck? Are you someone from a different video who is stalking me?

  • I'm ready for my close up now Mr. DeMille

  • @RottenJaws LOL.. Great flick.. Great ending..

  • one of my ten favourite movies of all time... PTA is brilliant

  • boogie on down to see fatso drop dead

  • Siskel loves Daffy Duck cartoons but hated everything else.

  • the movie is based very loosely on John Holmes life and tell the rise and fall of a porno star; its a sad world that PTA captures very well; the more I watch it the more I like it; he doesn't exploit the fact that he making a movie about porn actors with lots of gratuitous sex scenes, he gives each character the weight they deserve

  • @zenburger don cheadle, burt reynolds, mark wahlberg and the whole cast was great reilly, i loved how cheadle played a unique brother when he was selling stereos.

  • @zenburger I don't think its based of Holmes, as they talk about him in the film..

  • @lordcrumb07 watch the director commentary, PT Anderson himself admits the movie was inspired by John Holmes. He recreated scenes almost verbatim from the classic Holmes documentary "Exhausted".

  • I usually agree with Ebert's reviews but I had to go with Siskel on this one. Boogie Nights is a terrific example of an incredibly well-made movie that does everything right, except it's all been done before that it felt pointless to seriously get into the story. It had almost the exact same script structure as Scorsese's GoodFellas except it took place in the porn industry.

  • How can anyone be so tasteless as to care about Ebert's opinion. He is a failed sleaze writer.

  • There is some point to this movie, about disenchantment or something or another. But really I don't care about "the point" because it was so damn fun to watch.

  • Useless, didn't need to be made, crap movie about porn without showing anything. Like middle men, totally pointless and did not need to be told. Total crap.

  • oh what did fatso ebert say? oh tell me what to think!

  • @TheDeeFormed he's not telling you what to think, he's telling you about the movie, what he thinks, and on that you can judge if you want to see it.

    Critics aren't there to try and persuade you.

  • Boogie Nights was a really good movie. Gene is missing the boat here.

  • I think an arbitrary ending in the porn industry is fitting. I agree with Roger on this one.

  • im more with siskel. boogie nights is a good movie, probably a great one (ive only seen it once) but it did feel pointless overall. def worth checking out tho

  • Gene was a curmudgeon.

  • awesome ebert mentions the drug deal scene right away!

  • i'm just curious why do all these videos start to get distorted after a little while?

  • "...played by rap singer turned Calvin Klein model Mark Wahlberg." lol, Marky Mark has come a long way...

  • Dirk digler was based on John Wadd Homes. But Dirk was mother Theresa conmapred to the sociopathic John Holms.

  • I used to watch this show almost religiously.. And mostr of the time EBERT was right! the man sure knows a good movie when he sees one.

  • Ebert was right. Great movie.

  • Ebert always flaps his hands like a bird lmao

  • one of the greatest films ever made. Gets better with each viewing. and as usual Ebert was right

  • i'd be disgusted had they not argued. pta is surely happier his movie formed a discussion rather than an obligatory review.

  • Siskel completely misses the point of the ending. It's as if he was looking for the cliche ending of showing the characters crash and burn. Anderson intentionally ended on an "up" note b/c everyone already knows what terrible destinies eventually await them. And the film isn't about porn - it's about Hollywood. Mainstream stars are just as twisted, delusional, egotistical, and shallow as the porn characters in 'Boogie Nights.'

  • SISKEL, siskel, siskel.... sorry.. your wrong on this one my friend.. RIP

  • I agree with Siskel on Burt's role in this. His best work!

  • The porn industry is no longer a hollow, sad, losing world ... to be sure (at least, not for the actresses). I think it's pretty cool certain performers, e.g.: Sasha Grey, Jenna Jameson, Traci Lords, etc., have had a degree of crossover success into mainstream. People are so self-righteous and judgmental about the lives of others ... at least these women (and men) are intelligent enough to get paid for what most idiots do for free. As far as love and companionship go ... get a goddamned dog!

  • @daTruChosen Boogie Nights is great because it is even handed, and honest in how it deals with the world of pornographers. Your comment, however, shows that you only see the glossed-over image of pornography that the master salesmen want you to see. Each of the porn stars you mentioned was a victim of child molestation, which is a trait shared by the vast majority of adult stars. Also, adult stars often turn to drugs to cope with their personal pain, and lead very tragic lives.

  • I've always loved this movie, even though a few of my friends were detractors...I've always thought it was breathless and highly creative in it's portrayal of the 70's, if a bit too carnivalesque. It's almost as if this is a remembered version of the 70's with big fancy cars and girls and neon-splashed nightscapes and cocain fueled days...but doesn't really seem all that grounded in reality...I think the porn industry has always been a hollow enterprise intellectually, but this movie dazzles it

  • Usually I'm in complete agreement with Siskel on films, but this is one of the few exceptions.

  • Great from Ebert

  • Absolutely my all-time favorite film. I've seen it at least twenty times. I have nothing really to add to the discussion, but I thought I'd just brag, haha.

  • boogie nights is amazing, I just watched it again and wow its even better now... 

  • Ebert's right this time. It's ridiculous to need an underlining moral to every story. Siskle's hung up on the movie not showing that drugs are bad, or good. The movie doesn't have one point it's trying to show you like a documentary made for a high-school education class. "Boogie Nights" is multifaceted, which Siskle is smart enough to understand but the problem with reviewing 10,000 movies is that you will occasionally not have the mood to catch something good about a movie.

  • @LEATHERrebelJUSTICE siskel you asswipe nigger fagit. i hope you die or even better get murdered, dont EVER NEVER BASH PAUL THOMAS ANDERSON's work, next whats this fucker going to do? bash stanley kubrick? maybe martin scorsese next, fucking asshole.

  • @malows1234 Cocaine is a hell of a drug, isn't it?

  • Comment removed

  • where can i find the rest of this?

  • I'd have been so proud as a filmmaker to have made a film that split two great critics like that so powerfully.

  • "wait roger you just said it had no point and then you told me the point". lol. love these guys.

  • r.i.p siskel.

  • IN MY BEST 5 FILMS EVER MADE !

  • @trickykid73 Same i loved it - so entertaining and easily Mark Wahlberg's best movie!

  • Boogie Nights = film masterpiece

  • they never let each other finish their sentences, that's how they care about getting their opinion through.

  • i liked magnolia more, this was an amazing film but i found it very dark

  • @kapillie We could all debate all day, I'm sure, what PTA's best is. I know most PTA fans will consider this heresy, but I actually put Magnolia at the bottom. It was great, yeah, but definitely my least favorite of his films. There was a lot I would've cut, and some parts seemed preachy. Still excellent, but the weakest of his movies, in my opinion. Here's my rating: 1. Boogie Nights 2. There Will Be Blood 3. Punch-drunk Love 4. Hard Eight 5. Magnolia.

  • @MckyMseNTarotCrds i agree all fantastic movies i guess it was just the characters i really liked in magnolia

  • old pervy bastard burt brilliant!!

  • I loved when the bickered.

  • Boogie Nights isn't so great really. It can't justify it's long length, so it uses several arbitrary scenes of graphic violence towards the end to try to keep you interested.

    Also, I hate the way most characters in PT Anderson movies are so aggressively stupid. No one can string a coherent sentence together, no one behaves in a believable manner. You could say, "We're watching a movie about lost and unintelligent people." And you would be right, but do I gotta sit through three hours of that!?

  • I agree with Roger Ebert. This is a fantastic film and is one of the best films out there. No wonder this show failed, their fighting is hilarious. Boogie Nights is great!

  • @marceloyanez111pt2 13 years on a show is a failure? Really? I thought it was because Gene died......guess not.....

  • I think the movie does have a point.

  • If only Siskel had lived to see Magnolia, Punch Drunk Love and There Will Be Blood.

    I think his opinion of PTA would've changed dramatically.

  • Boogie nights was an unintentional comedy I laughed throughout the whole movie

  • I don't agree with Ebert all the time, but he always makes sense. Siskel, not so much.

  • @kimwayan

    I think Ebert and Roeper agree on things alot more.

    I agree with Ebert alot myself

  • I completely agree with siskel I watched boogie nights for the first time recently and i loved it but when it came down to that last fifteen minutes it did not work it left me cold and felt like it was rushed or Paul anderson didnt know what to do with the characters and summed it up with easy way out cliches - if this film would have done a better job at that last fifteen minutes it would have been a masterpiece

  • @Chitownrunthis i thought the last 15 minutes or so summed up the film perfectly, just like ebert said. these people are nothing outside of porn, and once they got in, it's like a drug that they can't get off of.

  • Siskel seems to have some beef with PTA! 

  • @ckad79 Siskel completely misreads the ending. The point is they can't function in the real world without each other. In the end, they are all back as a family, though we aren't sure how long their good times will last. When Jack says to Amber, "We have all the time in the world" it's an ironic statement. But for now, anyway, it ends w/ them together again. They aren't changed at all, and will probably repeat mistakes. But they are a family, an unconventional family. Bittersweet, beautiful.

  • Comment removed

  • I love this movie and Siskel proves once again that time has proven most of his reviews are pretty inacurate. That scene with Alfred Molina at the end is one of the best of all time. Watch it on youtube and tell me that I'm wrong. You won't because that is the truth.

  • 8th favorite movie of all time.

  • The review on this is quite intriguing. I wanna embark on a theory here: I think Ebert was probably less effective as a critic once Siskel died. It's like after that tragedy, Ebert lost his direction. Because pretty much ANY review post 'Siskel and Ebert era' I disagree with. Not that my opinion should be held in high regard (or any regard at all), but still very telling all the same.

  • Burt should have won an Oscar for this.

  • Boogie Nights = Paul Thomas Anderson's masterpiece.

  • @NirvanaFan4Life not his only one though

  • @NirvanaFan4Life No. That would be "There Will Be Blood"

  • @abcdefh1992 no failed

  • @NirvanaFan4Life Magnolia? There Will Be Blood? You're just scratching the surface man

  • @NirvanaFan4Life You clearly haven't seen "There Will Be Blood" and "Magnolia". "Boogie Nights" is fantastic but only his 3rd best movie......

  • @NirvanaFan4Life I agreed with you till "There Will Be Blood".

  • @misterphelps I agreed with him until Magnolia. or Punch-Drunk Love; I still can't decide wich i like more. But I love There Will Be Blood as well.

  • @NirvanaFan4Life Have you seen this little film called ¨THERE WILL BE BLOOD¨?...

  • Lol! I love the arguing xD

  • Wow.

  • Thanks for the spoiler warning.

  • Thanks for the spoiler warning.

  • fugg'n right! Gene's right, Roger's right... they're never wrong but dammit.. i love when they debate!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more