The blandishment of a young woman pre-contracted seems so like another King, Henry VII's young son, Henry. I sense an approach but waiting eagerly for the conclusion.
Actually Mr. Dillon (Richard Du Cann) is compelled to be brief as there is a lot more he could have said about Henry Tudor's motivations - I think they only had about 6 hours to film the whole Trial. But he's brilliant - I am glad you are enjoying this and thanks for posting ;)
I think if Richard is acquitted, it will be largely due to Dillon's tergivesations (if that's the term); he's doing a great deal to get the jury confused. Or maybe I'm reading to much in it. He's good, anyway.
Defense counsel is giving a class on how to cross a difficult witness.
blastforth 8 months ago
The blandishment of a young woman pre-contracted seems so like another King, Henry VII's young son, Henry. I sense an approach but waiting eagerly for the conclusion.
PoliticalPars 1 year ago
Actually Mr. Dillon (Richard Du Cann) is compelled to be brief as there is a lot more he could have said about Henry Tudor's motivations - I think they only had about 6 hours to film the whole Trial. But he's brilliant - I am glad you are enjoying this and thanks for posting ;)
valentinejay 2 years ago
I think if Richard is acquitted, it will be largely due to Dillon's tergivesations (if that's the term); he's doing a great deal to get the jury confused. Or maybe I'm reading to much in it. He's good, anyway.
Keep'em coming, please!
DoctorPlausible 2 years ago