even the image stabilization can't be calculated because if you are holding with your hand...its subjective....you might have been morte shaky with one than the other...as well as shaky at diff times suring the recording, etc
Regarding the IS of 'all the other canons', it's important to remember the new Canon S11 and S21 have all new IS. All the prior Canon models supposedly had IS but I could never tell any improvement when I turned it on. I spent many hours comparing the XR500v, CX520 and the S11 and opted for the S11 and was glad I did. I found that both the 500v and 520v cameras 'warp or bow' the image when the camera is moved. I think it was part of the Sony IS.
@rayman4449 It's also important to note that the S11 has an 6mp effective pixel count and the sony's only have 4mp. This is why the video from the S11 has alot better detail and looks so sharp. As far as 'low light' performance, the Canon S11 automatically switches to 30p (from 60i) to maintain video quality and at that frame rate actually has better low light performance than the Sony.
The Sony can handle darker environments better than the Canon. But the Canon camcorder shoots sharper images than the Sony. I have been doing a lot of research on this topic and Canon is the best choice. It's abilities topped all of the camcorders out there including Sony's. You can see for yourself at the infosyncworld website (Which gives you a very in-depth review with full detailed sample images from the actual camcorders themselves.)
I hate Sony Support. I also hate how they try to monopolize everything they make thinking they're the only ones who can build those things so all their products are ridiculously overpriced. Good products, but way overpriced.
@ mkrisna __ I used to feel the exact same way but sony isint the winner any more - the sony xr500 suckssss - and they want 1,000 dollars for it - ummm noo - no more carl ziess lens that says enough right there cause that lens was everything to sony - no dynamic O.I.S - no option for shootiing modes - skippy & gltichy zoom function - battery life sucks - its barely hanging on - people just buy it cause it says sony on it not realizing that camera only records good standing still -
DO NOT COMPARE IMAGE QUALITY BY WATHCING THESE MOVIES. you do not know the settings and compression etc.
It is ONLY intended to show STABILIZATION. Please do not post regarding colours and quality because it is totally STUPID.
Criticaltinker, remember that Canon has the best HD lens quality (which is why Sony stopped Zeiss lens and started making their own lately, to try to catch the wagoon), the best bitrate with 24Mbit, is the only one to offer 24fps (or 25fps for PAL) cinema mode...
Heck you do not know even know what settings were used, framerates, colour settings (Canon has vivid, but may not have been used), what it was compressed to for Youtube, how it was deinterlaced (if filmed in 25fps and still kept the deinterlaced setting for Canon movie rendering it lowers quality), etc...
If you want to check movies, try it for real in a shop, or eventually spend some time watching and downloading movies on VIMEO.
@DLcine what about Panasonic? TM-700? Isn't that the best? So many diff cams, so many diff settings? I want to buy the best if i'm going to make an investment in one...the most important thing to me is HD vid quality and image stabilization and if Panasonic has the most MP..14.2...then isn't that the best?
sony wins!!! more stable image, sharp and vivid image. Plus it has slow motion... and can take up to 8.3MP stills while shooting videos.... that's cool
Thats what I was thinking onxtcz this are the two cams Im debating on. Im really just looking for the best picture. Im not looking to be a pro. So does the 24 mbit rate really matter ? then the sonys 16mbit rate thanks
@DEEJAYDAVEDENALI Had a chance to try out both, ended up buying the Sony HDR-XR500v. Why? The steadyshot blows all Canons I've tried out of the water. Built in GPS is actually useful for geotagging photos. Sony has a feature that will automatically take still photos as you record when it detects a smile.
from the looks of this video, sony has more vibrant colors, contrary to what everyone is saying. everyone says canon is superior by far. anyone else familiar with these cams?
I just bought one of the S11s without being able to try the IS first and I have been very pleasantly surprised at how good it is. The Sony does have an excellent IS and the CX has even better than the old XR but the Sony's IS warps the image where the Canon does not. Whether or not this matters to the average user, maybe not I don't know. If you're on the fence and really want the S11 but are unsure about the IS, I'd say go for it. You should be very happy.
does canon has very steady shot as sony does.. in the video dosent feel much but when u look at other video of sony steady shot its almost like using a steady cam.. i think steady shot 3 way is not totally active here..
i'm still weighing btw these two cams ...for the past few days my heart wants the canon , but looking at this hmmm i'd think sony has the better overall package
this are the two cams Im debating on. Im really just looking for the best picture. Im not looking to be a pro. So does the 24 mbit rate really matter ? then the sonys 16mbit rate thanks
Wow, this is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks so much for uploading the comparison.. Not much difference.. but I think Sony may have the upper hand.
you could make such a good horror moment while walking there
FacebookTheMetal 3 months ago
sony won! look at the sharpness! ftw SONY!!
HC32KING 5 months ago
SONY FTW!!
oribali1 1 year ago
even the image stabilization can't be calculated because if you are holding with your hand...its subjective....you might have been morte shaky with one than the other...as well as shaky at diff times suring the recording, etc
whole27 1 year ago
'
both are same best digitalcameras
bestamerica 1 year ago
Regarding the IS of 'all the other canons', it's important to remember the new Canon S11 and S21 have all new IS. All the prior Canon models supposedly had IS but I could never tell any improvement when I turned it on. I spent many hours comparing the XR500v, CX520 and the S11 and opted for the S11 and was glad I did. I found that both the 500v and 520v cameras 'warp or bow' the image when the camera is moved. I think it was part of the Sony IS.
rayman4449 1 year ago
@rayman4449 It's also important to note that the S11 has an 6mp effective pixel count and the sony's only have 4mp. This is why the video from the S11 has alot better detail and looks so sharp. As far as 'low light' performance, the Canon S11 automatically switches to 30p (from 60i) to maintain video quality and at that frame rate actually has better low light performance than the Sony.
rayman4449 1 year ago
sony is dark, look at shadows.
ak3085 1 year ago
just got mine.you can see the results at my page..thanks for the vid
treveenos 1 year ago
can u recoemdn a good camcorder hd 1080p with external mic inputs
95bradders95 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Sony can handle darker environments better than the Canon. But the Canon camcorder shoots sharper images than the Sony. I have been doing a lot of research on this topic and Canon is the best choice. It's abilities topped all of the camcorders out there including Sony's. You can see for yourself at the infosyncworld website (Which gives you a very in-depth review with full detailed sample images from the actual camcorders themselves.)
Joshua271987 1 year ago
I hate Sony Support. I also hate how they try to monopolize everything they make thinking they're the only ones who can build those things so all their products are ridiculously overpriced. Good products, but way overpriced.
DevilsCuz 2 years ago 2
I prefer Canon, hate the lousy Sony support...but the Sony HD Cameras are simply better...damn
yogioto 2 years ago
The sony cx520 is not with the ACTIVE STEADY SHOT ON. I have one, and it is much better.
luizluiz1992 2 years ago
i have a hf s11 it was worth the $1500.00... i shot a music video search the malki song
CASHSTACKDENT 2 years ago
@CASHSTACKDENT hi, did you shoot the Malki video with the S11???? It looks great. What did you edit it with. Thanks in advance for responding.
alexmcginness 2 years ago
how do you make a compare movie like that.....side by side?
Superanthony2006 2 years ago
My Eyes say SONY is the WINNER !!.... but i like Canon.. : )
mkrisnapratama 2 years ago
Comment removed
DEEJAYDAVEDENALI 2 years ago
Comment removed
DEEJAYDAVEDENALI 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ mkrisna __ I used to feel the exact same way but sony isint the winner any more - the sony xr500 suckssss - and they want 1,000 dollars for it - ummm noo - no more carl ziess lens that says enough right there cause that lens was everything to sony - no dynamic O.I.S - no option for shootiing modes - skippy & gltichy zoom function - battery life sucks - its barely hanging on - people just buy it cause it says sony on it not realizing that camera only records good standing still -
DEEJAYDAVEDENALI 2 years ago
DO NOT COMPARE IMAGE QUALITY BY WATHCING THESE MOVIES. you do not know the settings and compression etc.
It is ONLY intended to show STABILIZATION. Please do not post regarding colours and quality because it is totally STUPID.
Criticaltinker, remember that Canon has the best HD lens quality (which is why Sony stopped Zeiss lens and started making their own lately, to try to catch the wagoon), the best bitrate with 24Mbit, is the only one to offer 24fps (or 25fps for PAL) cinema mode...
DLcine 2 years ago 11
Heck you do not know even know what settings were used, framerates, colour settings (Canon has vivid, but may not have been used), what it was compressed to for Youtube, how it was deinterlaced (if filmed in 25fps and still kept the deinterlaced setting for Canon movie rendering it lowers quality), etc...
If you want to check movies, try it for real in a shop, or eventually spend some time watching and downloading movies on VIMEO.
DLcine 2 years ago
@DLcine I was about to post saying it depends on the settings but you got there first lol.
ChewySatisfaction 2 years ago
@DLcine what about Panasonic? TM-700? Isn't that the best? So many diff cams, so many diff settings? I want to buy the best if i'm going to make an investment in one...the most important thing to me is HD vid quality and image stabilization and if Panasonic has the most MP..14.2...then isn't that the best?
Please educate me
whole27 1 year ago
sony wins!!! more stable image, sharp and vivid image. Plus it has slow motion... and can take up to 8.3MP stills while shooting videos.... that's cool
criticaltinker 2 years ago
Thats what I was thinking onxtcz this are the two cams Im debating on. Im really just looking for the best picture. Im not looking to be a pro. So does the 24 mbit rate really matter ? then the sonys 16mbit rate thanks
kingleo42042h 2 years ago
cannon FH S11 better than all other cannons under 1,000 and better then the 1,000 dollar sony xr500 - wayyyyyyy better !!!!!
DEEJAYDAVEDENALI 2 years ago
@DEEJAYDAVEDENALI Had a chance to try out both, ended up buying the Sony HDR-XR500v. Why? The steadyshot blows all Canons I've tried out of the water. Built in GPS is actually useful for geotagging photos. Sony has a feature that will automatically take still photos as you record when it detects a smile.
andreyco 1 year ago
from the looks of this video, sony has more vibrant colors, contrary to what everyone is saying. everyone says canon is superior by far. anyone else familiar with these cams?
onxtcz 2 years ago
I just bought one of the S11s without being able to try the IS first and I have been very pleasantly surprised at how good it is. The Sony does have an excellent IS and the CX has even better than the old XR but the Sony's IS warps the image where the Canon does not. Whether or not this matters to the average user, maybe not I don't know. If you're on the fence and really want the S11 but are unsure about the IS, I'd say go for it. You should be very happy.
rayman4449 2 years ago
sorry, but i see that you used in cx520 standard steadyshot.
You should switch it to "active" then it works much better.
qweq3 2 years ago 2
does canon has very steady shot as sony does.. in the video dosent feel much but when u look at other video of sony steady shot its almost like using a steady cam.. i think steady shot 3 way is not totally active here..
Artisticloud 2 years ago
i'm still weighing btw these two cams ...for the past few days my heart wants the canon , but looking at this hmmm i'd think sony has the better overall package
Kemenyan73 2 years ago
this are the two cams Im debating on. Im really just looking for the best picture. Im not looking to be a pro. So does the 24 mbit rate really matter ? then the sonys 16mbit rate thanks
which one did u go with?
kingleo42042h 2 years ago
hey try it in low light please, i'm looking forward for the results thanks for the upload
JoeKnewl 2 years ago
Wow, this is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks so much for uploading the comparison.. Not much difference.. but I think Sony may have the upper hand.
Raener 2 years ago 6