Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (74)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow I had no idea this guy even existed...

  • My understanding was that Einstein later came to accept the idea of ether but his early work had already taken root. His later statement fell on deaf ears. It's good to see others revere this man and Tesla as much as I do. Thanks for your video.

  • The biggest fuckface on the planet was JP Morgan. Tesla was a true hero.

  • Nice Book ! 

  • WHOA love the 16 books by Walter Russell Link thanks so much!!!

  • That's a lot of reading to catch up on. Thank you for all of this. My wandering mind needed a direction, I think I just found it.

  • see this title, Walter-Russell-Genero-Radiativ­e-Concept-or-The-Cyclic-Theory­-of-Continuous-Motion,

    where are the parts listed on the fifth page of that document (the ones labelled 1 to 15 under Authors Note)? those are the ones i'm looking for, but only a couple of those pages are in that document.

  • @JustSomePerson888 The 15 principles you want are discussed in Walter's book called "The Universal One" which is included in the batch of books.

    :o)

    I also have all the diagrams from his books uploaded in my facebook photo album for easy sorthing through.

    Or you can flip through the document I put together called Twin Opposing Vortexes and The Misconception of Pull which is also in the video description.

    I put together A Lot of Walter's Diagrams, Dr. Keshava Bhat and more.

  • @TheRealVerbz - right i see it there now. one thing i noticed almost right away though - you'd wrote me here saying void is all electrons, but page 108 of that book says void is magnetism and matter is electricity.

    personally i see electromagnetism as expression of same distinct force anyway.

  • what i was wondering, about the electrons when they aren't seen as 'probability' clouds (which is only because they are going too fast to measure / pinpoint), is how do you account for how chemical equations work? ie in materials science, an atom with say 1 outer e- will join most readily with an atom missing 1 e- from its outer shell - i wondered what is the equivalent of that, if you have concepts for ''amount of charge'' or the element properties when it comes to how they bond together?

  • @JustSomePerson888 There's Years of material to read through. Start familiarizing yourself with Walter Russell's perspective and many books.

    I uploaded 16 of his books and you can download them all for free in the video description.

    5 Excellent books are "A New Concept of the Universe", which is a re-write of "The Universal One". "Atomic Suicide", "The Secret of Light", and "The Genero Concept of Cyclical Motion" are Must reads and explain all your questions in context and detail with diagrams.

  • @TheRealVerbz - right, cool. i must have checked a different link before cause i couldn't find those. nice one.

  • i do know the drawings at your website, either i forgot the name or some sources i saw them in didn't say where it came from - it is all the 'usual' 'sacred geometry', so yes & yes, i know what you are meaning.

    except the not-big bang part, what do you think happened instead?, i tend to think that makes sense as this has to come from somewhere/thing, needs an inception point, and it does tie in with sacred geometry 'all coming from one point' view.

  • @JustSomePerson888 There was no Big Bang, nor was there any violence or explosion whatsoever.

    2 Cones of energy effortlessly passing through each other will create a ring of energy that expands outward.

    Psyence observes an expanding ring and ASSumes that an explosion from a spherical mass must have initiated the expansion. There is a simultaneous contraction with the expansion.

    They say, "In the beginning, there was nothing... which exploded." (Fail)

    Twin Opposing Vortexes:

    watch?v=v_PQnsxW56Q

  • @TheRealVerbz - oh ok you object to the method they describe. i was thinking you meant you didn't agree in some other way.

    where do the original cones come from then, what are they made of how did they get there - is that part the same as 'conventional' attempts to explain origins of matter spacetime etc?

  • also, do the conical forms (the hot and cold) by any chance interlock to manifest matter? cause i remember that being natures way of doing the interlocking tetrahedon thing, you know like with those artificial merkabah field thingies (delta-T).

  • @JustSomePerson888 Nature's magnets are conical. Man's magnets are cylindrical. Man judges nature using man made tools.

    Yes, the converging inward thrust of electric forces (Twin Opposing Vortexes) is what creates (integrates) matter. Yin - Female - Negative

    The outward thrust is what dis-integrates matter. Yang - Male - Positive

    Combining the 2 is what contributes to transmutation.

    Need harmonics, pressure and electricity converging in specific manners.

    Some call the 2 Vortexes the "Merkabah"

  • is the transmutation of compounds / elements using the electricity concentration? cause that would seem right, for some types anyway, as you can induce electron shell jumps (and aquisitions or sheds) with electric 'shock' to matter.

  • @JustSomePerson888 According to Russell, Ed Leedskalnin, Pier Ighina and many others... there are no electrons, shells or orbits. It's a fabrication of man originating from the failed model of the "atom" by Neils Bohr. No one has Ever seen an atom or its so called parts.

    What Psyence calls a 'vacuum' is compacted electrons which = space / reciprocal of mass.

    The solar system models and electron shell models are 2D rings when they should be a 3D cone.

    It has to do with converging vortexes.

  • @TheRealVerbz - IBM took images of atoms, not their interiors i don't think but from outside - they are spheres (of differing sizes), they were already stacking atoms over a decade ago....what do you mean no electrons? so what is it in those models that is travelling down wires? when an ion or cation is made, what is the 'unit' knocked off or aquirred then, or is it meant in terms of the cones being offset (that produces a charge change), so it's like a wave-view of matter all the time?

  • @JustSomePerson888 IBM took images of Magnets not "atoms". Nothing in nature on any scale behaves the way their cartoon models show in text books.

    They take a picture of 1 thing and label it something else to fit their fallacies.

    The stacked spheres look Nothing like a proton / neutron with orbiting electron.

    There are no electrons and they aren't pumping through wires like people think.

    A vacuum Is compacted electrons. (negative mass)

    When you take air out, you're pumping electrons (aether) in.

  • @TheRealVerbz - the sphere is what it looks like from outside it - the electrons are moving so fast that it looks solid, if you look at Tellurianism (which might be difficult as i searched it online recently - and there's no websites about it!) it shows how the same thing happens in outer space - you see things as clouds or rings or ovals etc that look solid - from a distance, when you get closer in you start seeing they aren't solid, but are composed on other stuff that is moving quickly.

  • @JustSomePerson888 Space is compacted electrons. "Electron" is another word for what science calls "nothing." Both solid mass and space are in motion.

    A sphere in 3D is a cube in 4D but all the surrounding pressure renders the cubic wave into a sphere.

    A coil or glowing vortex wrapped tightly will glow and give the false impression that a spherical mass is projecting the light equally from all sides.

    There are no orbiting electrons.

    There are no orbits, micro or macro. Only helical trajectories.

  • @TheRealVerbz - i'm not saying wave model is wrong, that is true as well, it just is thought of in say like standing harmonic waves - each atom is its own wave packet, so is some macroscopic object composed of many atoms its own standing waveform, and so forth.

    how does the no electrons model explain how semiconductors work? if you mean the e- travel as waves not particles, then yes i can see how that'd work, but otherwise? i don't see e- as neg. mass, the charge isn't its mass.

  • Check the vid description.

    "Neither light, heat, magnetism or electricity flows from 1 point of space to another. They aren't a flow varying as the inverse of the square of the distance according to Coulomb's Law, but a reproduction as the inverse of the cube of space. Light doesn't travel. The light & heat which appear to come from stars or suns has never left the star or sun. What man sees as light & feels as heat is the reproduced counterpart of the light & of the heat which is its cause."

  • @TheRealVerbz - can't say i agree, but maybe i just don't know how you visualise it. no offense, but i'll stick with what i can 'see' and what i know answers all the things i can think of, conceptually i mean, i don't have equations for any of it.

  • I am sure that all the knowledge of these brilliant minds...HAS LONG BEEN and STILL IS being applied, but not by the 'general public' or for the good of Planet Earth.

    I hope this will change, and soon.

  • i want to learn the truth about everything but i don't know where to start... can someone share with me some resources?

  • Fascinating. I will pick up his books over the holidays and enlighten myself.

  • Einstein was given offers he could not refuse....

  • @sailorvenussun - by the alien mafia...

  • Walter Russell is the real deal. Read it slowly if you have to like me to let the concepts play over in your head. It is the beautiful truth! The new dawn of free energy technology has come! Like Jason says, share it with everyone, you will want to once you read it!

  • You should definitely read Gerry Vassilato's: Secrets of Cold War Technology, project Haarp and beyond. Tesla discovered the Aether as driving force of the Universe. It's in our fingertips.

  • @jatigre1 Awesome!! Thank You. I've never heard of Gerry Vassilato. I love learning new things! Gonna spend some time looking into his work.

    John Keely was another person who discovered Aetheric forces, as well as Pier Luigi Ighina.

    It Is at our fingertips. So exciting!

  • Ordered. My brother had read Walter Russel's, "The Secret of Light," and had said that book shaped his views. Sadly, I never got a chance to read it because he lent it out and was never returned. I ordered this book today - I can't wait for it to com in. :)

  • Must see, watch?v=tP2rqTadd4g&feature=mf­u_in_order&list=UL

  • I would like to point you all to Marko Rodin and his rodin coil. I would also tell you to go type in thrive movement and space and motion . com

  • @Josephjoel3 I know Marko personally. He and Jamie Buturff have been helping me with the information needed to wind my 24 inch Rodin Coil.

    watch?v=NRf4fvhU3GM

    I also know many of the speakers featured in the new documentary Thrive. Awesome!

    I'll look into the SpaceandMotion,com right now! Right on.

    Marko Rodin still has some major misconceptions about "black holes". He still believes in "the speed of light", pulling forces of gravity, nucleus to atoms and all that B.S.

    We're gettin there tho!

  • Tesla on Einstein :

    “ ...the relativity theory, by the way, is much older than its present proponents. It was advanced over 200 years ago by my illustrious countryman Ruđer Bošković(1711-1787), the great philosopher, who, not withstanding other and multifold obligations, wrote a thousand volumes of excellent literature on a vast variety of subjects. Bošković dealt with relativity, including the so-called time-space continuum ...' definitely look up Bošković :)

  • I've always felt that it wasn't Einstein himself, a better analogy would be that the DoD had hidden Einstein and Other top theoretical physicist's Real work (His Spinoza's ":GOD") Unified Field Concepts

    Just like they had hidden Nikola Tesla's Dynamic theory of Gravity and Walter Russell's work, all the science regarding the Atom-Tsar Bombs etc

    Hiding conceptual science of forms (instead of formula) is more valuable to them than hiding the layouts-schematics to any weapon we've ever created

  • @TheJoyofDance There is an inverse to everything. Using contrarian logic, it seems only fair to balance Thermodynamics and Conservation with Cryodynamics and Liberation.

    I coined that term 2 years ago.

    It's the difference between a physical string vibrating and a ring of magnetism wobbling. We can call the ring of force surrounding a magnet an "Aetheric Ring" because it has no mass.

    The dynamics of a massless wobbling ring and a physical vibration of a string are 2 different sets of laws.

    

  • IF YOU TYPE WALTER RUSSELL AS "SOMEONE WHO INSPIRES YOU..." ON FACEBOOK HE DOES NOT EXIST! SHAME SHAME

  • Kaku is a shill... so is Hawking... i get so incensed when i hear the crap they both spew...

    no one has heard of Walter Russel, as they did Tesla... I never heard of Tesla in any so called school i ever attended. I found out about him on my own... I just heard about Mr. Russel about 9 months ago...

    now? i tell everyone i know about Mr. Russel's works...

    He is an inspiration... 

  • @hummingbirdhoneybear YOU, my friend are well informed!

    Please add me at Facebook,com/Verbelli

    I have A LOT to share and I can use all the insight I can get.

    Also see my newest videos on my page and sort through some of the playlists.

    Right on!

    --Jason Verbelli

  • @TheRealVerbz Hey, thanks for making this video. I will definitely look into the works of recommended scientist. I'm from Croatia, so basically everyone knows who Tesla was. But the real deal scientific experiments and achievements that Tesla made are far from the public. They have been so covered up that most people find them unbelievable.

  • @hummingbirdhoneybear

    Only just now really directly looked at Russel's work. Tesla a few months ago - I was in school only 10 years ago, A-level physics/mathematics/chemistry/­biology - no Russel, Tesla, sacred geometry, fibonacci, Leedskalnin... how comes?

  • thanks for the tip on this book. Looks great.

  • As a physics student at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, I have many of Walter Russell’s books. In a recent paper for a theoretical physics class, I used Walter Russell as a source. Once I got the paper back, one of the comments on my source page said that Walter Russell was not a credible source. It is so upsetting that academia is so closed minded, that anything not in their text book is now not credible.

  • @yetimtbfreak I feel the SAME way you do brother!! Funny how they won't give Tesla, Russell, Schauberger, Leedskalnin, Keely, and the REAL scientists the credit.I saw some 12 year old kid on the news today that apparently is challenging Einstein's theories. I think it's imperative we get that kid Walter Russell's material before the lamestream quackademia sets him on the wrong course.

    Take a look at DB Larson's video here too. You'll love it.

    :o)

    h t t p://library.rstheory.org/video­/dbl-1978

  • @TheRealVerbz And I'd love to personally come in and talk to your teacher and humiliate him in front of the entire school. I'll challenge him to a Real academic debate regarding the information he refuses to acknowledge.

    He can bring his whole family too. I'm confident enough that at least half of his own family will be standing with me by the end of the presentation.

    Your so called teacher is an absolute moron. He sounds like the epitome of indoctrination verses genuine education.

  • @TheRealVerbz yea definetly.the only why is due to society been so stunished by a 12 years old that can do such a thing while most people get only to a certain level of education and not keep striving for more

  • Very interesting and thank you for showing this. PLEASE watch my Electrinium battery videos.

  • @Neomundus Much thanks!! Also check out the other free books and information I posted in the description link.

    Recently updated.

    :o)

    Now that I look, I've actually seen one of your videos regarding Electrinium.

    I love this stuff!

    Add me on Facebook,com/Verbelli if you haven't already.

    --Jason Verbelli

  • @TheRealVerbz

    I do not have facebook. I am glad you liked the video, too many people just watch without giving it more thought. Too many regard it as fantastic technology but do nothing more, I find it strange that no attempts at replicating electrinium have been made . Godspeed.

  • G. Ohsawa conducted a series of experiments about biological and chemical transmutation with Luis Kervran and others. His philosophy is complementary to Walter Russel's view of Cosmos, plus a biochemical key for Man to bring Heaven on Earth.

    The appliance of logarithmical spiral of material creation and other experiments of Ohsawa interrupted by its sudden death...

    His bibliography is full of explanations why certain chemical reactions are possible or impossible due to their yin-yang position.

  • @AlbionsClouds Wooow! I haven't heard of Luis Kervran, or G. Ohsawa.

    I've very into incorporating Yin and Yang to all of my research.

    Also look into Wing Y. Pon's book called The Matter Being Project.

    It's a combination of I Ching, cosmology and chemistry.

    I need all the information I can get.

    Please add me on Facebook,com/Verbelli if you haven't already.

    :o)

  • I have this book as a pdf. I've never read it but only briefly looked through it. :) I should really take the time to read it. I think it came to me for a reason.

  • I had first seen the periodic table in a spiral by the founder of the macrobiotics institute, saying elements do transmute...I searched last year to little avial on youtube and web for a copy...I wonder if he learned it from Russell? I had Russells book on light for years, read it twice, guess that's why I'm always searching people now like Dan Winter, who talk about the spirals, octaves, of nature, thanks for reminding me...

  • @sandrasynar Also look into John Keely and the other book I have on the table in the video.

    Download both books for free in the description link at Scribd,com

    :o)

  • Can only think of one word why this has never been brought up by scholars throughout the world........ Illuminati

  • @ISMOPANAMA Hitler too.

    He burned a lot of books just so this stuff wouldn't be learned by the brilliant minds in his country.

    It wasn't all Einstein's fault. He was prevented from seeing the Helical Technology.

    Einstein based electric potential from a straight line which is actually the point of MOST resistance. Natural is a Phi spiral.

    Please look up my easy to read paper that Clowns mainstream physics.

    Look on Scribd,com for "Fist Fights With Physicists - The Caduceus Coil"

    Download it free.

  • Free Energy and Free Thinking dot com is my site which is all about proving the Cosmology authored by Walter Russell.

    Great work my friend. Russell's Cosmology explains this Universe much better than the set of theories.

    einstein michio koo koo and hawkings are all quackademic shills for corporate profits and control.

    Atomic Suicide by the Russell's ranks coeval with A new Concept of the Universe and is also required reading in order to fully grasp Russellian Science.

    Much Love!

  • I agree with you. Russell and Tesla are my hero's.

    Check my blog at "theuniversalone.blogspot.com"

  • do a search on flickr for walter russell and you'll come across scans of Walter Russell's scientific diagrams under the username esaruoho. there's all the diagrams from "A NEw concept of the universe", and various other scientific diagrams drawn by Walter Russell. check his stuff out.

    thanks for posting the video.

  • Thanks for the invite! OMG I have to get this book! Thank you so much for your information and work. :o)

  • Interesting.

    Thunderbolts of the Gods by Talbott and Thornhill

    Supports this work.

  • Great upload. One important lesson a person needs to learn is that the truth will not be given to you and you have to go find it.

  • This would make a hell of a documentary

  • @koneye I think a modern documentary about Walter Russell is Brilliant!

    The Webmaster of Philosophy,org is named Jeremy.

    If enough people emailed him at the website with that suggestion and the demand was large enough... I think it would be done.

    Hardly ANYone knows about Walter Russell now a days.

    Any promotion of his material is essential and a documentary would be awesome!

    Rather than wait, lets do it ourselves. Know anyone with a camera and knows a little directing?

  • Please read the information in the description link above ^^^

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more