Added: 3 years ago
From: AdvocacyCorporation
Views: 1,191
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (99)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I dont think it was the federal reserves printing of money that brought us into this situation. It was a variety of things, but my main concern is that the American people asked for huge loans that they couldn't pay back. They couldn't pay it back because banks were allowed to charge high interest rates on them. in my opinion, we could keep the same system if we liquidated the accumulated debt and replaced loans with IOU's. in this case, you pay back exactly what you spend.

  • The best solution is to created a global credit system based on constitutional law. The money would be like greenbacks, where interest is not paid on money,because the government creates the money, and not a private bank based on the British Empire.Income tax would almost go away, and what is spent on income tax would go from the advancement of mankind.

  • Such things that the money should go on is infrastructure,science,technol­ogy,and healthcare. Globalization would have to be stopped, as it is setup.Also, the green fascism would not work, violable technologies include Nuclear Energy as the main energy source, for all nations to get mankind out of the current path to the dark ages.

  • If you are getting tired of listening to this. LaRouche explains exactly how to replace the fed. according to the U.S. Constitutional principles. You can find it if fifty places on my channel.

  • you want to end the federal reserve? do you know what it would take? it would take working in large crouds and just riot. throw bricks at the building. light it on fire. if the federal reserve is gone there will be no more money. that's it. but unfortunately people nowadays just don't care. believe me if they did. there would be a revolution. we need to have one and I mean SOON

  • you replace the fed with nothing and make the U.S. Treasury issue a backed currency once again.

  • This is why I advocate the nationalization of the Fed, instead of bankrupting the whole system. It you simply gobble it up into Congress and keep the same system, it wouldn't be a change at all to the common people. The only problem you would have is that most if not all agencies fall under the executive branch, and this one, at least for a time would be under Congress.

  • If we end the Fed, we must have something to replace it with immediately. Otherwise, the bankers will shove another one down our throats. And that'll be worse than the Fed.

    Most people must have to believe in it before that change can come and stay. If people don't see the problem, they will be easily brought back to the dark side.

  • Thank you for caring and for posting.

    If we can all first learn to ask WHY? then to address the answers we dare to seek with the betterment of all souls on earth and the earth itself in mind, then we can literally change the future...NOW!

    Blessings all and no matter what...? Smile outloud!

  • On top of all the miseries these abominations are responsible for worldwide, and you still ask who can we replace them with? Cmon, ask JFK what he'd do. You know better than that.

  • this is crazy....i still cannot believe youtube wants to censor a simple comment.....

    this is ridiculous!!

  • The Second Bank of the United States (1816-1836). It was basically a copy of the First Bank (and The Federal Bank today), with branches over the country. Andrew Jackson, who became president in 1828, denounced it as an engine of corruption that benefited his enemies. His destruction of the bank was a major political issue in the 1830s and shaped the Second Party System, as Democrats in the states opposed banks and Whigs supported them.

  • Isn't that why we wanted to attack Iran?? Because they were not going to deal oil in US dollars???

  • I think it's a good idea to start preparing for dollar collapse. And in the mean I will be prying for a miracle.

  • People are being misled by thinking that we can just take down an institution and not have anything to replace it with. Whether we have peaceful change or non peaceful change we are in for challenges.

  • Great Idea

  • probably end up with a lot of very seriously confused desperate people. it has to be replaced with something. if not... wouldnt you be left to barter? if so; in a world where currency no longer exists, what has value? i would think those things containing value would be those that fill basic human needs. farming could easily produce currency in a situation like that. Food has real value. as well as clothing. so those that can operate the old weaves stand a chance to barter for .. food. and so on

  • but i wouldnt really say that this is feasable on a large scale. its something that can be done in a desperate pinch. but if you are stuck some where that a large screen lcd is an asset you would have to use for trade, i would assume you might need to find some one who has electricity. wonder what they are paying their electric bill with. what about gold standard?

  • numbers suggest that only 50,000,000 troy ounces of gold are produced each year, while the population expands by 1.19 percent annually. (dont hold me to those numbers, i pulled em off google real quick) with nearly 7 billion people already in existence that comes to 83,300,000. someone's not getting that gold value. do you see? so we end up in a situations once again where their are great pockets of wealth and the divider is Extreme poverty for many.

  • seems to me that at this point we are already spreading the wealth. is it fair to spend your hard earned money for others benefits? not really. but think of a world where the options are wealth for some and poverty for everyone else.. i dont even want to drive through that part of town. unfortunately, that part of town will engulf you.

    ok.. i just made all that up. but it makes sense to me.

    so bend over a little and take it in the rear if you want to live anywhere near civilized society.

  • at least until we can come up with something better.

  • greenback...federally backed legal tender..

    google times of london 1863

  • Study history. These people when alternative currencies have been proposed not only kill people -like Lincoln and JFK, they crash whole economies.

    You BETTER have a friggin plan and not just say "well it will work itself out" and then we will have "peace".

    Bullshit. What we will have is 90 percent of the people READY TO KILL the other 10 percent and the people will be demanding martial law because they can't feed or protect themselves. To THINK and DISCUSS this makes me a Marxist? Get a life.

  • I want to see Glass Stegall reinstated and HBPA passed. Period -that is NOT support for a man. This is support for a specific idea of a person. If you haven't figured it out by now, I care about ideas. Ideas that work. Ideas that FIX the SYSTEM problems we have.

    THIS is how you solve problems - NOT by endorsing people. You look at the SYSTEM. The truth is if rip out the federal reserve today we would IMMEDIATELY have massive bankruptcies ripple though society as what happened in the 1920's

  • For this movement to succeed we need to embrace all ideas that are going to work. Not just ideas in a particular group. THIS is the problem.

    Because I point out that when 10 thousand people march on Washington it is a WASTE OF THEIR TIME if national media does not cover it -I now somehow am a communist Is retarded.

    Keep your opinions. I am looking for solutions. That means crossing the isle and looking at hard realities.

  • I had to block a specific user - WA4RRN. I did not enjoy doing this. I want to tell you WHY I blocked him.

    To insist that I was Marxist just because I was suggesting that Ron Paul and the freedom movement endorse HBPA - the Homeowner and Bank Protection Act of 2007 - is LUDICROUS.

    Just because I support an IDEA that someone has does not mean I support the man. This went on for pages - stating that I was misleading people. I am NOT misleading people. I WANT to see this movement succeed.

  • Why did You Tube remove my original comment?!!!

  • Do you trust the FED REV??

  • Who'se got my silver!?

  • How did they get the gold to start with?

  • youtube is now censoring the comment box " I AM MAD AS HELL"

  • WA4RRN - If you are not willing to participate in a reasonable debate and do not answer my question I am going to block you.

    Google this:

    Homeowners and Bank Protection Act of 2007

    Your comments are not helpful now to this conversation.

    I worked with Larouche's organization on HBPA and this is disinformation you are now spreading. STOP doing this. This is your one and only warning.

  • good vid man

  • I definitely agree with you. I hate the FED and it is unconstitutional, but if there is no plan then things could be worse. Really if the FED was overthrown and people say 'screw you we don't want the FED or anything like it' then Congress would have no choice but to comply.

  • I goggled "HPBA" n' it it brought up some about the "Hearth, Patio & Barbeque Association"???

    WTF are YOU apeaking of???

  • Homeowner and Bank Protection Act of 2007

    - Govtrack it

  • :) good vid mate will be spreading it

  • Reinstating Glass Stegal?

    Larouche is pushing this too - does that mean this is BAD because HE may be a questionable character?

    THIS is the damn polarization I am talking about. We back people instead of IDEAS...

    I have presented HPBA and Glass Steagal.

    I have presented using the TREATY making powers of the USA to OVERRIDE the International Banking cartel.

    How the hell is this marxist?

    WHY would Ron Paul NOT be behind this?

    ...when are we going to realize we CANNOT do it alone...

  • My ideas are NOT the ONLY ideas.

    Polarization is EXACTLY what these people WANT. Critical thinking is what they DO NOT WANT. Do you REALLY think it matters what political ideology is proposed?

    It is all about picking and choosing what works and NO CAMP has ALL THE ANSWERS. It is painfully naive to think the latter. Circumstances change actions and perspectives. Get behind Obama now and make him successful -GUIDE HIM- or crucify him?

    A naive person chooses the crucifix and loses their power

  • I KNOW how easy it is to become polarized and you have to FORCE yourself to listen to Pat Robertson, Rush Limbaugh and Amy Goodman and Naomi Wolf to get ANY kind of unbiased picture.

    I care about RESULTS. 10,000 people marching on Washington was a BIG DEAL. Yet this was not covered in the media. So now End The Fed is going to do the same thing competing against YouTube Live? Give me a break

    Let's look at REAL solutions and demonstrate a comprehensive PLAN to show people what happens next

  • AC...As an OldPhart, I desire that you listen to REAL solutions other than some some "pure" Marxist like Larouche has shown his ass to be!

    Just WTF do you find in common between Ron Paul & Lyndon Larouche??? Ya gotta be phouchin' jokin', Sport!!!

  • woot woot! let's get naked!! :D I'm going to the protest this Saturday ;) great points though.

    no comment yet, to tired..would rather wait till we chat;) hope your doing well!Youtube live seems to be deliberate..kind of like how they masked other issues while HR 1955 was passing, the bailouts,etc.

  • Yep, hey VB.

    It is TIME to kick this thing up a notch and UNITE in ONE VOICE.

    USA180 has been my inspiration and having Scott Loper call me to personally thank me - which was moving beyond words - and now it is time to ACCEPT my greater responsibility in society and live my truth.

    I am going to call Larouche's people personally tomorrow. I worked with them on Pass HBPA when I was getting You Inc. going. It's time to stop talking and I just might need a puppet as a mouthpiece :)

  • nice jason. the thing that is the result of every problem known to man, is no actual equality. as long as there is competition/money/social classes, there will never be actual equality and the ruling class (zionists, nwo, illuminati, masons w/e) will make sure they continuously indoctrinate empty values into society so that we maintain the status quo on our own. food for thought.

  • Yes, I agree. We are treating symptoms of a MUCH larger problem. We the people are BROKEN.

    So what do you DO when you have BROKEN people?

    ...you make DAMN SURE that you do not have a BROKEN system.

    Fix the SYSTEM - deal with the PEOPLE and their equality or lack of later :)

  • AC..."Fix the SYSTEM - deal with the PEOPLE and their equality or lack of later :)"???

    WHAT a crock of BULLSHIT!

    Dunno how old you are...I'm 58yo. Haven't you ever wondered about why the Soviets so honored the French Revolutionm year after year???

    WAR=PEACE...SLAVERY=FREEDOM...­Welcome to Lyndon Larouche's concept of our coming NWO!

    HAVE you been able to find ANYTHING in Larouche's writings/speakings that indicates ANY acnowledgment of individual, inalienable, rights of man? LOLOL

  • Fix the SYSTEM - deal with the PEOPLE and their equality or lack of later:

    Do YOU or anyone else have the ability to CHANGE People, Places or Things?

  • what if we spread the mindset of true equality and then society itself stops tolerating the broken system? :)

  • Yes this is the OVERALL GOAL - INSPIRATION.

    Yet due to FREE WILL - and this starts to get spiritual - YOU DO NOT HAVE RIGHT to FORCE others to do what you want. You can ONLY encourage them. Point out and create systems that let the rats in the maze find their way to safety because YOU see the traps and they do not...

  • Nonamist...Dunno! Just what does "true equality" MEAN?

  • Just answer my question. Are you familiar with HBPA? We can attack each others points all day long and I LOVE a good debate however you need look at the material presented and you have been presented with a direct question. Please answer so we can continue this debate?

    :)

  • You have got to get BEYOND the Man and look at the policies - the HBPA legislation for instance, voted DOWN by Nancy Pelosi (just as she voted DOWN the IMPEACHMENT OF THE PRESIDENT HEARING having ANY teeth) in favor over legislation that favored the banks, WOULD HAVE PROTECTED THE HOMEOWNERS. PERIOD.

    Using the Treaty making powers of the USA is a RADICAL idea. Look at the specific legislation being proposed on GovTrack and you will see what I mean.

  • I agree this is NOT a problem based on RACE. This is a systemic problem. A problem of a SYSTEM - a BROKEN SYSTEM. So we need to understand the system and how it works before we rip it out and go into free fall and trigger MASSIVE bankruptcies that ripple though society.

    Why THE HELL are we NOT speaking in one voice? Even WE are divided. This is bullshit. Why is Larouche not involved?

  • AdvocacyCorporation...Josh, good video, as far as your questioning what would "replace" our FRS, if eliminated overnight!

    I can see NO similarity between Ron Paul & Lyndon Larouche, though. I watched the video of Larouche's conference and noted I didn't not here one mention of indidual rights, property rights OR any opposition to the new economic order coming...

    Nah, I learned Larouche was one of those longtime "PURE MARXISTS", back during the '76 Presidential Campaign.

  • The game is divide an conquer. It ALWAYS is.

    Larouche and his political views are not at issue here. Yet he IS MORE RADICAL than Ron Paul in wanting to put the WHOLE ECONOMIC SYSTEM into bankruptcy using the TREATY MAKING POWERS of the USA!

    This is a VERY RADICAL IDEA and it DOES have some legs. What about the idea or protecting the homes and the state banks that WAS IGNORED by our democratic congress?

    We better start speaking with ONE VOICE instead of 400 -going 400 different directions

  • AC...Of course it's always been "divide & conquer! For over 30 years, I viewed Larouche as a "useful idiot" or "fellow traveler" in service to those who are determined to enslave us! SURE, he had his problems with the communists (the "shock troopers" of the movement Marx advocated)...lots of collectivists have...

    His political views ARE at issue here!!! You suggest that Ron Paul wants "to put the WHOLE ECONOMIC SYSTEM into bankruptcy" as this quack advocates...

  • Not really. The game to look at PEOPLE instead of PROPOSALS. Now we talk about Ron Paul instead of the message he represents. This is a problem.

    Some IDEAS Larouche has have merit. Let's not be polarized. Larouche is interesting since he has ALSO been talking about the oligarchy. It is one point of view...

  • AC...NO!!! We are NOT talking personalities here...we are talking IDEAS, IDEALS, PROPOSALS!!! YOU are the one naively asking WHY Ron Paul hasn't gotten together with Lyndon Larouche...and the answer is pretty obvious!

    HAVE you been able to come up with ANYTHING remotely resembling Larouche advocating LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY as ANY sort of inalienable RIGHT by him? Didn't think so...

    Face it, Larouche IS a PURIST MARXIST or a MARXIST PURIST,take your pick, ready to move on...

  • Is it naive to get Ron Paul behind HPBA?

  • AC...I'll be honest...WTF is "HPBA". As far as your wondering the WHY of Ron Paul hasn't "gotten with" Lyndon Larouche...it GD obvious!!!

    Quote ANYTHING from Larouche about personal responsibility, sound money, private property, personal inalienable rights, etc...

    Ya caint.

    Enjoy your MENTOR!

  • Ya talking about the Health, Patio & BBQ Association Google delivered me as HPBA?

  • Homeowner and Bank Protection Act of 2007

    - Govtrack it

  • Larouche is interesting ONLY in the recognition that he would willingly RULE you...

  • Please answer my question. Are you familiar with HBPA? I don't care WHO proposes it. I can about it's effects...

    WHY is Ron Paul not uniting on the common thread to PUSH that?

  • HBPA? I googled such and got a return o' "Hammonds Plains Baseball Association...too!

    AC...WTF are you trying to convey??? So far, IU's thinking ya B full o' BULLSHIT! Prove me terribly wrong?

  • I thought we were done blaming the jews. You need a little lesson in history and abandon that antisemitic BS. I imagine you blame the blacks, asians, hispanics, and purple people for all your personal problems. Wow!

  • Jason-

    Check this video out from Ron Paul about the recent G20 conference. I think it will clear up your questions particularly about a solution to the feds non-existence. Just search:

    Ron Paul on the Recent G20 Summit

    Also, it is way to cold in the north here to go naked, I'd would have to knit quite the cock sock.

  • If the G20 gets the SINGLE central bank we have a REAL problem. I posted this video above in reply to this video.

    Ron Paul is saying a lot of valuable stuff but we REALLY need to think this through and not let the European oligarchy tell us what to do. Larouche MUST be involved.

    ...whether you agree with him or not.

    I agree with a LOT of what he saying and we CANNOT go to a single central bank of the world. These are the people behind the IMF. It is TIME for us to take a REAL STAND.

  • AC...I spet 3 hours watching Larouche's self-promoting CRAP and the ONLY alternative I saw him present was some sort of weird CABAL involving the USA, Russia, India and China who would determine the values of currency and interest rates for the WORLD???

    Please tell me you aren't a disciple of Larouche's BLUE PILL???

  • I'm in a corporation and in recent years we've had to go through frequent and annoying audits for Sarbanes Oxley. This is to assure the stock holders. If the FED is a corporation should it not be exempt from such audits ?

    Yeah, I think congress should take it over and that would give them a better understanding of money and the money supply and that every piece of legislation has a financial impact.

  • I completely agree. If Sarbanes Oxley is good enough for GM and Ford who we are about to give 25 Billion dollars we do not have to - it is CERTAINLY good enough for the Federal Reserve.

    Congress is DEFINITELY THE PROBLEM as they STOPPED THE LEGISLATION THE PROTECT THE HOMES and the STAT SPONSORED BANKS. Look at HBPA on GovTrack if you disagree...

    This is a damn disgrace. Lets protect the corporate PRIVATE banks for making bad financial decisions but NOT protect the homeowners? WTF?

  • Well the IMF is to audit the federal reserve when bush get out of office. look it up. so if they were to get rid of it it would never get audited. And the dollar use to be based on oil but it has now become based on debt. every time a loan is approved or a credit card is handed out a new dollar gets printed. and if people don't remember GM has been going under for years.

  • The IMF IS the central banks...

    This is BAD. The IMF imposes reorganization rules on countries which KILL ITS SOVEREIGNTY.

    The NEVER want the IMF involved in the USA. PERIOD. Look at EVERY country that they have been involved in. Read up on John Perkins - Economic Hit Man

  • Opec no longer sells all its oil on the dollar and is no longer considered the petrodollar. That is why it is no longer needed as a reserve currency and has been steadily losing its value since Iraq started selling its oil on the Euro.

  • Go to the USA180 web site and take a look at the second to last article called this:

    Largest Oil Reserves Discovery In The World It Is American In North Dakota 4.3 Billion Barrels Top News

    WE HAVE 8 TIMES MORE OIL THEN Saudia Arabia!

  • AC...Really? One of those little details that piss off collectivists is the PRIVATE PROPERTY/MINERAL RIGHTS that have been historic in the 48 States.

  • Let's be CLEAR I am not a collectivist. The ONLY workable solution right now is the embrace free will and this means embracing capitalism - greed driven exercise of free will. We got away from that and created a system of CORPORATE DEPENDENCY and SOCIAL DEPENDENCY which led to the rise of the Democratic and Republican party. BOTH paradigms based on DEPENDENCE -so we have rising levels of PERSONAL and CORPORATE DEBT and EXPECT the SYSTEM to bail us out when we behave irresponsibly

    THIS is ending

  • You can't end the fed in a day. The first step would be to get congressional control of the fed in the interim. The US produces enough silver to go to a silver standard which is constitutional. We have had currencies in the past backed by nothing but were not inflationary because congress carefully controlled the money supply.

  • Warnomore...Just what "currences in the past backed by nothing" did we have???

  • One I can think of off hand that was successful was the green back. Of course since Nixon took us off the gold standard by executive order none of our currencies have been backed by anything. For awhile the dollars status as the petrodollar kept it from depreciation as quickly as it might have.

  • ok so it seems so far we all agree with this idea!

    Wow an idea all Americans can agree on?

    Incredible...lol ok fine all few of us so far.

  • yes Larouche's ideas seem very plausible..

    We do need to consider all options for sure.

  • You abolish the FED and replace it with silver dollars. Meaning the dollars are actually made out of silver and not just colored silver. That way all dollars would be equal to 1/10th of an oz of silver or something like that.

  • You rip the fed out of the system you get IMMEDIATE bankruptcies that will cascade through EVERY industry until nothing is left...

  • I'm going to have to play the bullshit card on this one.

    There is no rational reason that every industry would fall due to cascading bankruptcy.

  • What you do is you take over the Federal Reserv!!! And you put these idiot who run FED in to JAIL!

  • If it was that simple. I don't want to see a systemic failure.

  • You bring up some good questions, what would a new system look like? The real problem with the Fed is who owns it, and who gets the money from the interest of the money printed. I would argue that even nationalizing the Fed would do wonders, I really don't care how the system works, as long as our congress is back in control of the money supply. With that said, it doesn't have to be sound money, or the gold standard.

  • With that said, we're going to fail if we end the Fed or let it continue. The real problem is that they want a world central bank, and that would be much harder to fix, or to abolish. Also the reason why everyone has a central bank, is because we helped them set it up, we lead the way. It is possible that if we rid ourselves of the Fed, and take control of our money, other nations will in time do the same. No not all problems will be solved, but a lot could be.

  • If we incorporate Larouche's solution - which is a REAL solution - we can succeed at this...

  • I mean you can say whatever you believe in is the REAL solution. But the idea that there would be mass bankruptcies doesn't hold water for one fact. It's going to happen anyways. Like I said, I don't care, but if he plans on not Nationalizing it, and not taking the Fed and giving it's authority back to Congress, then it's not a solution at all. We'll end up in the same place eventually.

    Bottom line, the USA should have complete control of her money.

  • But you're right, that would be more of a bankers way, or a lawful way of going about this. I have no problem with his plan, on one condition, maybe you didn't mention it, that Congress is control of the FED, and we don't have a private bank owning our currency. The buying of treasury notes is ceremonial, so we cannot say we control anything in term of the FED. But you're right, that there needs to be a plan as well. It's always good to ask questions.

  • AC...I simply fail to see "Larouche's" so-called "solution" about one damned thing concerning our economic mess!

    WTF are are you talking about?

  • Google this:

    Homeowners and Bank Protection Act of 2007

    LAST TIME - I do not want to BLOCK you. You need to answer my question.

  • We need to affect change from within. We cannot escape the system it is world wide.

    We must affect the change from within, because we are all inter connected. There is no where to run away to.

    There is no ignoring this situation either.

  • Great Video..You need to have somethign ready to replace something

  • So what are your thoughts on that?

  • Jason,

    This is very critical to let people know about..but first go to endthefed and participate in starting legislation to end the fed on Nov 22nd 2009 this saturday.

    We will use Larouche's ideas and make sure that we don't try to end it without something in place.

  • Dude, End The Fed is in a few DAYS. 2008. :)

  • I do like the idea of naked protesting...this is beautiful.

  • Why does youtube not want duh420duh to express himself? Cause he fucking spams, that's why! XD

  • No, Duh kept trying to post legitimate comments and got pissed off that the YT filtering kep deleting them.

  • Yt doesn't delete comments. Sometimes they just don't go through due to certain circumstances. :p

  • Yep

  • very interesting video.....makes us think!!!

  • That's the idea :)

  • There are a LOT more than you think. I can help in that department. The tricky part is finding people who have feet in BOTH worlds - reality and conspiracy.

    I have not seen his name involved. I would expect a WIDER presence if it was and a MAJOR announcement. THAT would be POWERFUL

  • Yes, so you find the ones that do see things from your level of awareness. The challenge we face is to bring people to a common level of awareness.

    The people in the "freedom movement" have even lost sight of what they are fighting for. Let's look at what we do WHEN we succeed and create a vision of THAT and address the system issues present here. Larouche is DOING THAT. WHY is he not involved?

  • The critical mistake people make is they LOOK at the PEOPLE as the problem when what they REALLY need to be looking at is the SYSTEM ITSELF.

    In it's current form this protest is going to be just about as effective as the march on Washington. Period.

    You would accomplish more having people show up naked with signs at the federal reserve locations.

    I am tired of failure. Failure comes because people do not understand what they are really doing and the outcome if they succeed. They need to

  • The people are so divided. Hence the problem. They have forgotten what they are fighting for. They are polarized into the Left, Right and Conspiracy - ALL perspectives need balance and this is what the NWO DOES NOT WANT - CRITICAL THINKING PEOPLE.

    Let's find out why the hell Larouche is not involved in this...

  • great vid good work 5*'s  express your self

  • Thanks, Chain

  • Yep. The problem was the general public was not engaged. We have that technology today. Enough people have to get behind it.

    FIRST they have to wake up. It has to become personal to them. What WE have to do is have a detailed PLAN when they do.

    Tearing apart the FED and watching the economy collapse is not my idea of a desired outcome.

    I STILL can't understand why Larouche is not engaged in this - either from Ron Paul or someone else. He knows more about this than ANYBODY.

  • No, AC...Larouche is a fucking PURE MARXIST OR a MARXIST PURIST...whichever ya desire!

    What the FUCK do you seriously think Ron Paul would have in common with a phouching Marxist NUT like Larouche???

    Have you EVER heard that fucking collectivist even MENTION the ights of man...NOT ordained by MAN???

    Ya gotta be seriously joking if'n ya think yo' ass be addressing Folks in America who desire LIBERTY, Sport!!!

  • Are you prepared to answer my simple question?

    Are you familiar with the HBPA? If not can you read it and we can have an intelligent discussion about the bill?

  • AC...I thought I had made it clear that I'm ignorant o' "HBPA"...

  • That would be GREAT!

    8 percent of the people doing that cannot accomplish this - unless you start your own company and do it.

  • Put that aside. People are too caught up in the fight. What happens NEXT?

    We need to think this through. We need to understand the function the FED serves and REPLACE that function. This is typical systems engineering...

  • Well, we better understand what kind of issues are going to be presented if we just pull the plug on the FED

  • We CLEARLY have the OIL to change the economic landscape. Why the HELL are we not using it? Add this FUEL to the fire. Get some naked people covered in OIL and go protest. Do we NEED OPEC to back our dollar??

    Largest Oil Reserves Discovery In The World It Is American In North Dakota 4.3 Billion Barrels Top News

    - recent article on the USA180 web site

    What REPLACES the FED and the CENTRAL BANKS?

  • Yep. I am not concerned about HOW it gets done. Lets ASSUME it WAS done. What happens next?

    THIS is what I care about. As far as I can see we would have a domino effect hit that would bankrupt business after business in succession until everyone was unemployed. How do you stop THAT?

  • Is that really the question here? Is it not that somehow we need to understand WHAT WILL HAPPEN if we snapped our fingers and it was gone?

  • why does youtube not want me to express myself?

  • why does youtube not want me to express myself?

  • Sharing and Exposing Truth, Corruption and Fraud. Take ActioN!!

  • why does youtube not want me to express myself?

  • After a five-year interval, the federal government chartered its successor, the Second Bank of the United States (1816-1836). It was basically a copy of the First Bank, with branches over the country. Andrew Jackson, who became president in 1828, denounced it as an engine of corruption that benefited his enemies. His destruction of the bank was a major political issue in the 1830s and shaped the Second Party System, as Democrats in the states opposed banks and Whigs supported them.

  • The govt. would print your own money and mint your own coins, so you wouldn't have to pay interest to issue money, a good start.

    Then people can choose what currency they buy and sell things in, the Euro, the Dollar, the gold coin, or even barter why not.

    Soon the dollar would find its real value and the US can get back on its naked feet.

  • But what would happen IMMEDIATELY? That is a long term beneficial effect :)

  • Well immediately there would be a bit of chaos as everyone around the world digests the information, but the Head of the Treasury should take over the reins, and away you go.

    Perhaps shut down markets for a short time during the transition, or maybe not even, it's just like one bank taking over another, things still go on, just under new management.

  • Not quite.

    The overall effect would be to stop the flow of money into the system which would send people and businesses into immediate bankruptcy starting a chain reaction.

  • Not if correct preparations are made, there is no reason it would be more troublesome than any other takeover.

    The new owners can still operate the machinery.

    It is interesting that you also assume that the system needs govt money flowing in to survive, this would suggest that the country is already bankrupt and cannot fend for itself without constant influxes of new money.

    Stopping that would be a great start.

  • The country IS bankrupt. Have you looked at the irregular activity in the Stock Market?

    We passed the midpoint a while back. Check out my favorites for the video about the stock market projections passing the midpoint and matching the pattern in the depression.

  • Yes I know the US is bankrupt, but not a lot of other people do, so well done !

    It won't be easy to change things, what's for sure is carrying on the same way is not going to help the people. I think people would pull together if they had leadership that told them the truth.

  • I cannot understand why Larouche has not been engaged

  • I cannot unerstand why Ron Paul didn't make a bigger impact, he was the only one talking any sense, and with the voting record to back up what he was saying.

    Such a shame.

  • We can't look at this issue from a single point of view. It's like we need to engage the mainstream and bring together ALL the people in the fringes. Until that happens, we are lost.

    I EXPECTED to see Larouche get behind the End the Fed

  • why does youtube not want me to express myself?

  • why does youtube not want me to express myself?

  • What you're saying is a cyclical argument. We can't get rid of the of the Fed because we would become bankrupt, but we are bankrupt so we need the Fed. There is no real change that doesn't come with a bit of pain. There is no reason why there has to be a great disturbance in our markets because if you nationalize it, it will work the same way. I would even seize the money that they have profited from ans use that to stable the economy.

  • Not if we declared the WHOLE economic system BANKRUPT and put the system into receivership.

    Check out Larouche's video - click on the link

  • I'll look at it. Honestly though, I'm down with any plan, as long as the people of the United States of America becomes the owner of the Fed. That's all I really care about. If we can't even control our own value, our destiny is not our own.

  • AC...I DID check it out! You'd put "receivership" of our "economic system" into the hands of a Pure Marxist OR followers like Larouche??? JEEZ!!!

  • This is not the HBPA.

    Receivership is a different concept that he is talking about and there is some merit in THE IDEA of using the treaty powers of the USA.

    Are you going to have a conversation on HBPA and finally answer my question?

    WHY are you avoiding this?

  • why does youtube not want me to express myself?

  • why does youtube not want me to express myself?

  • why does youtube not want me to express myself?

  • You do bring up a good point....

    ...but I don't know about that last bit.....lol

  • Pft, why do people think that we have to replace evil government agencies with different evil government agencies. End the FED. And we don't need to replace it with anything. All we need to do is return to sound money.

    The argument that industry would collapse do to bankruptcy is baseless bullshit. A few might go out of business but only those who were closely associated with the government who made their fortunes off the counterfeiting of the FED. Such parasites deserve to go belly up.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more