What road was this on? Not Forest Canyon. Forest Canyon Rd is a narrow, poorly maintained section of road between East Valley Hwy and Sumner-Tapps Hwy.
Perhaps it was on Lake Tapps Pkwy E just East of Lakeland Hills Wy?
@df446 At the time there was only the Forest Canyon sign, very few homes and no businesses. After being up there again for drownings at Lake Tapps last summer I would have to say Lake Tapps Pkwy.
@Guinnie it is not a "dangerous" design, it has never failed due to a design flaw. like the guy said it was a cam gear that failed so you might wanna take that up with volkswagen because chances are it was one of the many aircraft engines modified from the vw motor. i'm just say'n.
This guy must be a heck of a good pilot, since these planes are very very fast on approach and survivability is quite low because of it's landing speed. 5 stars for the great pilot.
@DoctorofEducation I totally agree with you that's a small road and narrow for a plane like that! Most people couldn't have landed a Cessna 150 on a curved road much less something with a 90 mph approach speed... Looks like the wing broke so he didn't have control of steering and was along for the ride.
considering everything that is pretty good outcome. A few broken bits, but the cockpit is intact. Can't say that for many other crashes certified aircraft or not.
The accident occurred on August 25, 2001, according to the NTSB. Carburetor was found to be in too-lean condition, which stalled engine during descent. Pilot leaned carb out due to excessive rich setting. The plane is a Q2: it is an offshoot from the original single-seat Quickie which was powered by an opposed twin-cylinder 18-horse Onan generator engine.
I own a Burt Rutan Long-EZ that I fly a lot; Burt Rutan designs from this Quickie to the Long-EZ are incredible aircraft. He is way ahead of his time, it's the best aircraft I have ever flown.
My old flight instructor said once in ref to a Dragonfly (cousin of the Quickie) "I thought that I had to fly everything with wings, until I saw that". They are very crash prone, although this time I'm sure it was the engine and not the airframe.
These things are FAST, that pilot did a phenomenal job putting it where he did. Glad he's OK and walked away unhurt and sorry about that nice plane!!! Hope you get it flying again.
It's called a Quickie Q2 and it's powered (I think by a converted VW engine. Quickies rule.....just not when they're sat on the side of the highway like that
All homebuilt kit airplanes are classified as "Experimental." I know...I'm building one now. I don't believe that Burt Rutan designed the quickie. The original ones used target drone engnes...just about impossible to get now.
If you look the Quickie kind of merges the gear with its wings for lift and the wing behind the canopy look smaller, the Dragonfly looks like it has 4 wings for lift and the gear is a completly seperate peace. But you're right the basic design is real close.
This is a Burt Rutan, Q-200 Experimental Aircraft. It is a great flying canard aircraft. This was a popular kit to build. There was also a tri-gear conversion kit that moved the gear in from the wingtips and then had a nose wheel. It is sad to see one like this. I have seen worse, but they can be fixed and back flying~!
Burt didn't really design the Q2 or Q200, he designed the Q1 Quickie with the Onan 18 hp engine. Also it's quite easy to tell the difference of the Dfly and Q2, the Q's are more rounded looking and the Dflys had 3 gear configurations including the tip gear as this one has.
I miss this plane it was my best Q but my current one is faster and is a Q200.
@VX2100DV It was actually late Aug. Best part of the story was when I flew to N. Carolina 3 hours later and the co-pilot recognized me from the news before he left for work and asked me "were you just on TV?" and I said probably.... "did you just crash land" and I said yes.... the shock on his face was priceless.
Hardly a "Crash". Looks like a successful emergency landing where the airplane protected the pilot quite well. Actually, to anyone who knows anything about anything that flies, it looks like it would glide quite well, if at a high forward speed.
Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing!
Glad to hear the pilot wasn't hurt! The airplane did appear to protect the pilot pretty well. I say the pilot did a good job landing this thing with the engine out!
Knowing how fast these little airplanes are and how hot of an approach you have to fly for a successful landing, this is no small accomplishment! Sorry about your airplane though!
Thank you for saying so. I do miss that plane it was a really nice one. The guy that built the engine put the wrong cam gear in and it eventually failed. That guy should have been shot since he's suppose to be an expert VW builder and knew better.
I still have a Quickie but with a different engine and it's great. I was lucky I had a place like that to land otherwise I wouldn't be writing this.
I have 260 hrs in a Q200. I sold it because I knew if the engine quit, it was a quick way to die. The 170 mph cruise on 5 gph was nice. It was a hand full to land with low forward visibility. What it needed was a center tundra tire like the Europa with the wing tip wheels removed and glider wheels there. This way it would be able to land safe. The canard is a death trap. Don't pitch up in a stall, you may not recover....
I was the one who landed this plane. I landed on the parkway on top of the hill, the road was opened just two weeks before the forced landing. I just unhurt only a small bruise on my left arm.
Despite what it looks like, you did a very good job landing this. Is this a Q-200? I was told what it was when I covered this, but after six years I've forgotten.
It's a Q2. The cam gear failed. I was fortunate that there was no one in that direction in the path. When the plane finally came to a stop I lifted the canopy and a lady in a green Honda accord was right in front of me starring at me with pie tin sized eyes asking if I was OK. I hopped out and say I'm fine don't call anyone, the EMT said they got nearly 200 calls a few before I even landed I think. I was lucky that there was no fire since it dumped nearly 25 gallons of fuel out of the plane.
I dont live too far from this site and worked in the area at the time of this accident. Forest Canyon must have just been finished?? I cant remember exact dates......
The most important thing is that you came out alright.
caioghiotto 2 months ago
25 gallons ouch!
nipponhouseplayer 7 months ago
Pilot derped that flight.
zimtower 8 months ago
What road was this on? Not Forest Canyon. Forest Canyon Rd is a narrow, poorly maintained section of road between East Valley Hwy and Sumner-Tapps Hwy.
Perhaps it was on Lake Tapps Pkwy E just East of Lakeland Hills Wy?
df446 11 months ago
@df446 At the time there was only the Forest Canyon sign, very few homes and no businesses. After being up there again for drownings at Lake Tapps last summer I would have to say Lake Tapps Pkwy.
VX2100DV 11 months ago
@docrw small world huh?
blueanglesrule 1 year ago
it is a dangerous design
Guinnie 1 year ago
That's why they have been building and flying them for 32 years. Design had nothing to do with it. It was engine failure.
nalzager 11 months ago
@nalzager design is not the best Rutan had to offer
Guinnie 11 months ago
@Guinnie it is not a "dangerous" design, it has never failed due to a design flaw. like the guy said it was a cam gear that failed so you might wanna take that up with volkswagen because chances are it was one of the many aircraft engines modified from the vw motor. i'm just say'n.
mynameisntmicah 7 months ago
Lucky chap
solarday 1 year ago
Its called a Canard wing and the plane is a Dragonfly or Quickie 2
TitanMan404 1 year ago
I guess they need to do some more testing...
:-P
skazhiprivet 1 year ago
Poor Quickie...
Richey2009 2 years ago 4
Quote ''looks like a naboo star fighter''
looks like your retarded
FloppyDongProduction 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
drug runner lol :)
freakyflow 2 years ago
looks like a naboo starfighter
kyotoair 2 years ago 3
oh well rutan dont produce them anymore
kieranthinkssamisgay 2 years ago
This guy must be a heck of a good pilot, since these planes are very very fast on approach and survivability is quite low because of it's landing speed. 5 stars for the great pilot.
DoctorofEducation 2 years ago 5
@DoctorofEducation I totally agree with you that's a small road and narrow for a plane like that! Most people couldn't have landed a Cessna 150 on a curved road much less something with a 90 mph approach speed... Looks like the wing broke so he didn't have control of steering and was along for the ride.
That is one talented pilot, my hats off to him!!!
*
4cryingoutloudagain 1 year ago 4
considering everything that is pretty good outcome. A few broken bits, but the cockpit is intact. Can't say that for many other crashes certified aircraft or not.
nothingIwanted 2 years ago 2
The accident occurred on August 25, 2001, according to the NTSB. Carburetor was found to be in too-lean condition, which stalled engine during descent. Pilot leaned carb out due to excessive rich setting. The plane is a Q2: it is an offshoot from the original single-seat Quickie which was powered by an opposed twin-cylinder 18-horse Onan generator engine.
SenorSpode 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Looks like the experiment failed!
killingamps 2 years ago
LoL Very good. ;)
Rover2000P6 2 years ago
I own a Burt Rutan Long-EZ that I fly a lot; Burt Rutan designs from this Quickie to the Long-EZ are incredible aircraft. He is way ahead of his time, it's the best aircraft I have ever flown.
MTPilothln 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
And We Care Because...
adamkeam 2 years ago
i think thats a quickie q2
kieranthinkssamisgay 3 years ago 3
WHOOOOOOOOOPS!!!!
kgcwhazup 3 years ago
My old flight instructor said once in ref to a Dragonfly (cousin of the Quickie) "I thought that I had to fly everything with wings, until I saw that". They are very crash prone, although this time I'm sure it was the engine and not the airframe.
JonJon95GT 3 years ago
These things are FAST, that pilot did a phenomenal job putting it where he did. Glad he's OK and walked away unhurt and sorry about that nice plane!!! Hope you get it flying again.
alloutperformance 3 years ago 10
It's called a Quickie Q2 and it's powered (I think by a converted VW engine. Quickies rule.....just not when they're sat on the side of the highway like that
hangarrat101 3 years ago
thats not an experimental plane, you can buy one Burt rutan designed it
bert91212 3 years ago
All homebuilt kit airplanes are classified as "Experimental." I know...I'm building one now. I don't believe that Burt Rutan designed the quickie. The original ones used target drone engnes...just about impossible to get now.
DougRodrigues 3 years ago
nah im pretty sure he designed it, i watched it on the history channel and after it i looked it up, but almost 100% positive he did
bert91212 3 years ago
yea i double checked it Google Burt Rutan quickie he did design it
bert91212 3 years ago
Oh, okay...I stand corrected. I didn't know that?
DougRodrigues 3 years ago
Rutan quickie. Beautiful plane.
11507jennie 3 years ago 2
what a terrible loss of your baby...
456run 3 years ago 4
Beautifull airplane
masterpaperaircrafts 3 years ago 5
It's either a Dragonfly or a Quickie. The differences a subtle, at least to me.
rsduhamel 3 years ago
If you look the Quickie kind of merges the gear with its wings for lift and the wing behind the canopy look smaller, the Dragonfly looks like it has 4 wings for lift and the gear is a completly seperate peace. But you're right the basic design is real close.
xfatdannx 3 years ago
So this is clearly a Quickie. Thanks. I can clearly see the difference now.
rsduhamel 3 years ago
look at the engine cowlings- dragonfly cowling bulges for the cooling baffles...
gstoner007 3 years ago
This is a Burt Rutan, Q-200 Experimental Aircraft. It is a great flying canard aircraft. This was a popular kit to build. There was also a tri-gear conversion kit that moved the gear in from the wingtips and then had a nose wheel. It is sad to see one like this. I have seen worse, but they can be fixed and back flying~!
mousedevouredcat 3 years ago 2
Burt didn't really design the Q2 or Q200, he designed the Q1 Quickie with the Onan 18 hp engine. Also it's quite easy to tell the difference of the Dfly and Q2, the Q's are more rounded looking and the Dflys had 3 gear configurations including the tip gear as this one has.
I miss this plane it was my best Q but my current one is faster and is a Q200.
docrw 3 years ago 5
Looks like a UFO to me! LOL JK!
hawk7900 3 years ago
Hey, the propeller is still good! <]:-D
roughrider040 3 years ago
your face
kylesaenz90 3 years ago
your face
kylesaenz90 3 years ago
the plane looks like a Rutan Quickee
DrGreTuLR 3 years ago 3
Saw one of these once, think its called a "dragon fly." Can't remember, but it might of been a Kit plane.
surf4luke 3 years ago
looks like a routan "quickie" airplane
goofboot 3 years ago 4
isnt that just a biplane?
gerbain87 3 years ago
It's called a tandem wing. See my video under "docrw" for more.
docrw 3 years ago 4
Thank you. Please feel free to post one of the Quickie videos as a video response if you would like too.
VX2100DV 3 years ago
Anyone know the date, like as in what day in september, if it was before 9/11?
Cirrux 3 years ago
It was before the 11th, Maybe around the 7th or 8th.
VX2100DV 3 years ago
@VX2100DV It was actually late Aug. Best part of the story was when I flew to N. Carolina 3 hours later and the co-pilot recognized me from the news before he left for work and asked me "were you just on TV?" and I said probably.... "did you just crash land" and I said yes.... the shock on his face was priceless.
docrw 5 months ago
It was late August but can't remember the date exactly. I only got a couple of scratches...
docrw 3 years ago
wow its strange that it happened in september of 2001
dudeholysh1t 4 years ago
what is so strange about it? Since the invention of a plane, every day and every month somebody crashes...
Geistero 3 years ago
looks like a q200
j4cko56 4 years ago
this happend September 2001- intersting
Jakearijuana 4 years ago
Hardly a "Crash". Looks like a successful emergency landing where the airplane protected the pilot quite well. Actually, to anyone who knows anything about anything that flies, it looks like it would glide quite well, if at a high forward speed.
bbtapb 4 years ago 5
Wonderfully condescending remark
OIMAPauly 4 years ago
Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing!
Glad to hear the pilot wasn't hurt! The airplane did appear to protect the pilot pretty well. I say the pilot did a good job landing this thing with the engine out!
Knowing how fast these little airplanes are and how hot of an approach you have to fly for a successful landing, this is no small accomplishment! Sorry about your airplane though!
Mtrhd0024 3 years ago 4
Mtrhd0024
Thank you for saying so. I do miss that plane it was a really nice one. The guy that built the engine put the wrong cam gear in and it eventually failed. That guy should have been shot since he's suppose to be an expert VW builder and knew better.
I still have a Quickie but with a different engine and it's great. I was lucky I had a place like that to land otherwise I wouldn't be writing this.
docrw 2 years ago 3
sure doesnt look like it would glide to well if the engine quit. looks like it would just sink
djdecember 4 years ago
hey wait a mini
look like out gas did fall not too bust guy not die i knew on tv see b4 police say
idk how min time fly down no look our is
10fox say airplane out gas did fall on light back more out flying 160mph low down 50mph bust on look video see did
mun2cat 4 years ago
Docrw,
I have 260 hrs in a Q200. I sold it because I knew if the engine quit, it was a quick way to die. The 170 mph cruise on 5 gph was nice. It was a hand full to land with low forward visibility. What it needed was a center tundra tire like the Europa with the wing tip wheels removed and glider wheels there. This way it would be able to land safe. The canard is a death trap. Don't pitch up in a stall, you may not recover....
Brainonplease 4 years ago
I was the one who landed this plane. I landed on the parkway on top of the hill, the road was opened just two weeks before the forced landing. I just unhurt only a small bruise on my left arm.
docrw 4 years ago 8
Despite what it looks like, you did a very good job landing this. Is this a Q-200? I was told what it was when I covered this, but after six years I've forgotten.
VX2100DV 4 years ago
It's a Q2. The cam gear failed. I was fortunate that there was no one in that direction in the path. When the plane finally came to a stop I lifted the canopy and a lady in a green Honda accord was right in front of me starring at me with pie tin sized eyes asking if I was OK. I hopped out and say I'm fine don't call anyone, the EMT said they got nearly 200 calls a few before I even landed I think. I was lucky that there was no fire since it dumped nearly 25 gallons of fuel out of the plane.
docrw 4 years ago 13
Comment removed
docrw 4 years ago 2
Looks like a Quickie Q-200?
very sad.
ormus55 4 years ago
I dont live too far from this site and worked in the area at the time of this accident. Forest Canyon must have just been finished?? I cant remember exact dates......
mrdavidjames 4 years ago
FC had be open maybe 3 or 4 weeks?
VX2100DV 4 years ago
it WAS a pretty cool looking plane. at least no one was driving or walking their dog on that road.
i liked the shots with the police SUV in back of the plane and then the close up of police and the (i assume) pilot :)
AuntBee09 4 years ago