Added: 3 years ago
From: circlecityrabbit2004
Views: 117,716
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (983)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • YOU GUYS DISGUISE HERITAGE WITH HATE, HAVE SOME BALLS AND ADMIT ITS HATE!!

  • @faepmagn7 Ok....ok! Now settle down. We hate you. Now you have justification to hate us. Carry on.

  • @FastPonyGT LOL! festdir suspiciously sounds alot like rphb. writes like him too [sic,moron] [sic,idiot].

  • @claddaghcelt Yes, more than likely. If it looks like a parrot, squawks like a parrot, repeats like a parrot, then it's probably the parrot RPHB. :)

  • @FastPonyGT better load up on "Hypothetical Birdshot'. [disclaimer i am not now or ever threatening to injure, maim or cause death to any individual or animal whether it be real or imaginary] no trolls were harmed in the making of this post.

  • @claddaghcelt 12 gauge? LOL!!!! Veeeeeeeeery clever.

  • @FastPonyGT well i've got a 20g rem870 or a 12g mossberg. so i'll probably use the 20g. they are only parrots.

  • @claddaghcelt I'd like to make a request for the 12, since he's also a "big turkey." Please don't reduce the round. Thanks! lol.

  • Whatever. The heat has boiled your brain.

  • Still got my money!

  • So... the "heritage" is getting your ass handed to you in a war you started principally to defend the institution of slavery? Fantastic. Anyone else think that if this is the highlight of your heritage maybe you're better off looking to the future rather than the past?

  • @rushncap people like you are at best naive, all of you eat that bullshit slavery argument

  • @DeutschAmerikaner100 -- No, you're right, the Civil War was started primarily over the question of which side to eat the egg from. Idiot. Yes, slavery was the principal (not the only, just the principal) reason for the the Civil War. But feel free to try to make up something else and see if your bullshit sticks to the wall. And the South got wasted, by the way. Note how France doesn't celebrate Waterloo, and Italy does not celebrate wars against the Visigoths...

  • @rushncap such a left wing moron

  • @DeutschAmerikaner100 -- Oh, well, as long as you make an insightful and comprehensive argument...

  • @DeutschAmerikaner100

    Better a 'left wing moron' than a 'right wing pussy'

    There is a reason we beat decency into you cowardly & immoral traitors.

  • @DeutschAmerikaner100 Saying somethings bullshit doesn't make it so. Why can't you just own up to the slavery part? It's not like you love niggers anyway.

  • @PercyMcQueen11 WE don't care for left wing liberal socialist propaganda.

  • @DeutschAmerikaner100 And WE didn't care for traitorous, white trash cowards.

    Do tell, how did that work out for your traitorous, immoral & cowardly, surrender-monkey ancestors?

    We beat decency the CSA so thoroughly, even their apologists deny the very thing they died & surrendered for.

    They begged for mercy. Mercy, although unearned, was granted by their moral & martial betters.

    You're welcome!

  • @festdir hahahahahahahaha. wud love to have a beer with you

  • @rushncap I wouldn't say the South got their ass handed to them. At one point they nearly won the war.

  • @metalupyourthrash -- well, sure. Just like at one point Hitler nearly won the war. And Napoleon. In general we tend to count the end products, not the "almost" part. As they say, "close" only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

  • Anyone who stands against the GOV and BANK will be dealt death and this time it will come silently. (LISTEN...lest ye might hear) 

    youtube.com/watch?v=LXfXuk6aWJ­c&feature=player_embedded

  • Rather than sitting back in porch rockers, drinkin' hooch, and singin' "we gonna do it again" is only proof you will loose again. Why didn't the South become educated, build the best nations jobs, or follow in Andrew Jackson's shoes? One of the only Southern men that ever did anything for this nation while the rest of you set on your lazy asses grinding your 150 year old axes. Can't cut the wood if you never enter the forest. This time GOV has the ace while you still hold a joker.

  • Investment or war profiteering in both the war and reconstruction! (not to mention the reality of occultists and their depopulation plans!) the Alan Greenspan's and Rothschilds of the world start wars based on insider trading and the elitists ties to profitable private sector (security contractors) aka the real terrorists! This holds true throughout history and in the modern day as it was these greedy few like the deadmen at Goldman Sachs and Marvin Bush etc. That brought down the towers with t

  • @TThorne931 dont act like u know what ur talking about!! The civil war and "union" victory were all about making Masonic power plays for domination and control suppressing our freedom while wearing it's mask!! Creating bigger more tyrannical government to preserve the elitists interests in global financial domination! I am in no way a confederate that was brought up with these views this is just the truth almost every wars real causes lie in the will for increased power, financial and investmen

  • boooooooo

  • I would totally nail that chick at :40.

  • @Bushido91328 she is a southern hog should be gutted like the pig she is

  • If only, if only...As awesome as it would be, there is little motivation at the moment. We would have to have mass protests like we see in Libya and Egypt, eventually coalescing around a political organization to organize armed resistance. Unfortunately, the only people protesting right now is the Tea Party, and I certainly don't want them founding a new nation. The moderate majority would make good leaders, but unfortunately they are just that: moderate

  • @wlomas378 So you want to murder Americans and you are a Tea party Terrorist . What do you hate America That is awfully similar talk to Bin ladin's words. so Terrorist how did you celebrate 9/11 this year a fireworks show and spit on dead soldier . People like you should be eradicated from the Unionist Race

  • @TThorne931 Umm...no. I didn't say one thing in there against African Americans. A modern CSA would be very unlikely to implement the racist laws it held in the 1860s, much like how the North is unlikely to hold deadly race riots like it did in the 1860s (more africans died in those riots than as a result of slavery the whole war). I already said the Tea Party would be an awful leader. And when did I say anything making me a terrorist? I mourned the dead on 9/11 like everyone else.

  • @wlomas378 If you stand behind a Nazi flag it dosen't make it any better that your flag still is for Hate not heritige . And the US riots were Free expression the Rape and slaughter of Slaves and Unionist heros of the North was the worse crime . And you support the KKK and the Confederacy makes you a Terrorist against the United States of America . And bullshit you mourned the dead you fucking traitor you celebrated their deaths because you Hate this country

  • @TThorne931 The Nazi party was a political party with a set ideology of racial purity and political consolidation of power. The CSA was a nation, with so many factions operating with in it that the only truly unifying aspect was that they were all southern. The 1863 riots involved a virtual pogrom against blacks and the burning of a black orphanage. That's taking free expression too far. I do not support the KKK, and have engaged in no violence, only verbal debate. no, i didn't celebrate on 9/11

  • @wlomas378 So Nazi Germany was a country does that make what they did okay . And the CSA was for stomping out any Race besides White Anglo saxon protostants . They wanted to kill any non white they found on the street . And there were no riots in 1863 in the North why you gotta lie to covor for your Nazi overlords . And yes you do support the KKK your from the south and you are a terrorist soldier murdering coward

  • @TThorne931 Germany is a country, and its fine to support Germany, just not the Nazi party, just as it's ok to support he CSA, just not necessarily the slave-owning elite. While white supremacy was prevalent in the CSA (as it was in every white nation at the time), killing slaves would remove the elites' work force, and waste the money they paid for them. Native Americans and Mexican Americans were allied with and joined the CS army, as well as many free blacks. Irish nd Scottish culture (cont)

  • @wlomas378 No it was neither appropriate to stand behind either flag against the Freedom of man . no Natives or Mexicans allied with the KKK armies . They south didin't care all they cared for was the supremecy of their facist ideals . No Free black ever joined without being forced

  • @TThorne931 Maybe not, but it is perfectly fine to stand behind it in support of an independence movement, such as Southern secession was for most people. It would never be appropriate to stand behind the Nazi flag, as the parties ideology expressly supported ethnic cleansing, but the modern German tricolour is perfectly acceptable as support for a nation. Stand Wati, of the Chocktaw, was the last CS general to surrender, while four Native congressmen represented Oklahoma to the CS congress.

  • @wlomas378 you mean a Racist Dictatorship . the southern flag is teh flag of the KKK. And The Germans shoudn't have a nation for the evil they spawned . Also As julis ceaser broke the armies of gaul to fight amongst their families the CS tricked people to fight on . And those natives were race traitors

  • @TThorne931 The Nazis were a racist dictatorship. Jefferson Davis was elected, and supported a gradual abolition movement to allow for economic adjustment and social integration. Almost all former Nazis are now dead, and most at the time were ignorant of the atrocities of the party. It isn't tricking if the CS gave them what they wanted: protection from Union troops, who were assaulting villages everywhere to make way for white settlers, and giving them reperesentation. they served their race

  • @wlomas378 Hitler was elected . And supported Gradual Genocide to Allow for Germany to Recover from its losts in WW1 . All CS terrorists are Dead .any supporters who live today are ignorent of the CS atrocties at Andersonville with Canablisim of Union troops . Enslavment by Jeb stuarts raiders . The CS tricked the Traitors to fight for Enslavment and the Racist White CS who has been stomping htem out across all fronts .

  • @TThorne931 In addition, Colonel Santos Benavides was a Confederate Mexican American who commanded the 33rd Cavalry and defended Texas from a major Union offensive. Blacks enlisted in the Confederate army,often despite the fact that they weren't allowed. 4,000 free blacks organized the Native Guard in Louisiana, a New York regiment reported a 700 man force of armed blacks working in concert with Confederate cavalry. In the beginning of the war, the CS army was more diverse than the Union's.

  • @wlomas378 So he was a Texan slave after the Slaver nation texas revolted to Defend Salvery He was forced to fight for communist Texas he should have faced execution . And the CS never had black soldiers only slaves. And Free gaurds were that gaurds not troopers . and Great the Hicks brought their slaves with them

  • @TThorne931 Slaves aren't given commmand over cavalry units. He was a free hispanic who joined because of his loyalty to Texas and love of his home. The Texan War of independence was fought for a number of reasons, including the Mexican governments requirement of being catholic and unfair tax and land systems. I just listed several examples of blacks serving in the CS army. Slaves were brought along, but only as servents. only free blacks were given guns. Native guard fought several battles

  • @wlomas378 The CS was desperate to Raise any people to stand Against the Holy Crusaders of Democracy and Liberty. To love Texas is to Love Slavery  And Racial hatread . Catholics are the Only Christian people unlike Protostant Atheists . And you mean Attempting to put an End to Slavery is why Texas rose up . And they were dragged by Cahins to Work As enslaved men told to fight for their freedom but would have been slaughtered apon the end of the war

  • @TThorne931 Actually, the Native Guard and the free black units in Virginia and Alabama were raised in 1861, long before the CS looked like it would lose, and they were organized by the blacks themselves, not the federal or state governments, and of the blacks discharged, none were executed. Hate to tell you, but the vast majority of your precious USA is Protestant, and evangelical protestants certainly aren't atheist. These men volunteered, so how dare you try and marginalize their bravery?

  • @wlomas378 So he was a Texan slave after the Slaver nation texas revolted to Defend Salvery He was forced to fight for communist Texas he should have faced execution . And the CS never had black soldiers only slaves. And Free gaurds were that gaurds not troopers . and Great the Hicks brought their slaves with them

  • @wlomas378 So he was a Texan slave after the Slaver nation texas revolted to Defend Salvery He was forced to fight for communist Texas he should have faced execution . And the CS never had black soldiers only slaves. And Free gaurds were that gaurds not troopers . and Great the Hicks brought their slaves with them

  • @wlomas378 So a Mexican Slaver who fought for Atheist Texas Communist Revolution to enslave people . And no blacks fought with the KKK armies . the Free blacks are able to do as they wish and So what there wrere 700 War slaves in the CS. the CS was the army of the Klu klux Klan

  • @TThorne931 Where are you getting that Texas was communist or atheist? especially since Marxism was only 12 years old, and the north, which was harbored far more support for communism among the industrial workers, hadn't even formed a socialist movement yet. the KKK was founded after the war, and the American flag is used as often as the Confederate one (1920s their motto was 100% Americanism). Free blacks freely chose to serve the confederate cause, such as the 700, the Native Guard, etc.

  • @wlomas378 So texes is Marxist you say . and the KKK was a goosstepping branch of the CS army marching hand in hand with Race Traitros like the Native gaurd and the 700 Slaves

  • @TThorne931 I'm saying Texas couldn't possibly be Marxist. The North started embracing socialist policies long before the South ever considered them. Again, the KKK was founded AFTER the war. IT's primary goal was to keep republicans out of office in the South during reconstruction. Again, they weren't slaves. You don't arm 700 slaves unless you have a death wish, and the bravery of these men was noted by northern generals. The Native guard were not traitors but loyal to their home of Louisiana

  • @wlomas378 All Texans and Texan Revolutinaries should have been shot for fighting 2 wars of slavery . Sam houston fist . the Free gaurd is a Free gaurd . And 700 blacks wow so the Generals sent their slaves to die against the superior unionist army

  • @TThorne931 And then the US would not include Texas, Oklahoma, the four-corners states, Nevada, or California, which seems an odd wish for someone so vehemently defending the territorial integrity of the US. 4000 free blacks served in the Native Guard, and the CS prohibited the drafting of slaves until 1865, so a 700 man force had to be an organized force of free blacks. They risked their lives for their homes, and you dishonor them by pretending they were forced to do it.

  • @wlomas378 Sand and Rednecks and communists christ the loss how much I care . no 700 Slaves were brought along As salves of their White Klan Officers stop with this Free southern Black bullshit . And the MA 54th Voulenteer infantry were the Free soldiers . And What does killing the Texans who fought for Slavery have to deal with the land we would conquer it all under the one Banner of the USA

  • @TThorne931 According to the history books, they were black slaves that fought for the confederacy of free will. Obviously, you know all your Civil War history from movies. While "Glory" is an awesome movie, it is not something to base research on. If Texas had not fought for independence from Mexico, it would not join the US, there would be no US-Mexican border dispute, therefore no casus belli for the US-Mexican War, and therefore no conquering Mexican territories

  • @wlomas378 No they were slaves If texas Never had fought for independence America would swarm the Borders of Mexico And defeat the Mexican State . The Texan Revolution was a Slaver revolution they should have been eradicated the revolutonaries should have been eradicated en masse . Glory is the Truth the 54th is a band of holy fighters against the Terrorist Southlands . The US would over run mexico and the Confederates for they are of evil truest embodiment

  • @TThorne931 Just because you say they were slaves doesn't make them so. History says otherwise. America would never have had an excuse for war if it hadn't annexed Texas. It's not a case of whether it could, but whether it would. Otherwise it's simply greedy landgrabbing at the expense of the inhabitants, in which case the US is an aggressor nation, making it the "evil" one. The 54th was full of admirable soldiers fighting for their country, as was the Louisiana native guard. Mexico is evil?

  • @wlomas378 Except oddly enough The Slaver Revoltuon in texas conincided with the Mexican Goverment abolotion of Slavery . And no the US has a birth Right to all the land in North America and to slaughter those unwilling to part with it . And Yes the native gaurdsmen were Gesatpo agents for the KKK . andthe 54th are holy men who fought the southern reich for Columboia . And Yes Fuck the mexicans

  • @TThorne931 Actually no, slavery was abolished in Mexico in 1824, long before the Texan revolution. Slavery was one issue, but not the only one. And it appears that you are the racist here, assuming that Americans have the right to steal from and kill innocent Natives and Mexicans so some white people can have their farm. Your rant is one giant anachronism. Gestapo were German Nazis and the KKK were founded AFTER the war. Neither would have employed blacks, and blacks would have joined neither

  • @wlomas378 nope they fought to end the Slavery in the Texan Province . Slavery was not only the 1st issue but the most pressing the KKK army invading the Southern States of America . No The Union States are promisied all the land in this Continent and to command the hemispehre. the KKK were the CS loyalists and Special operation forces . and Don't bullshit me your KKK troopers would trick slaves to fight for them

  • @TThorne931 the first KKK was founded on 12/24/1865, 8 months after Appomattox, and hundreds of unconnected but similar groups across the nation (record memberships was actually Pennsylvania in the 1920s). For the elites, it was the governments ability to take away property (like slaves), but the common people fought for independence and their agrarian way of life. Who promised the continent to the US? And why, we certainly didn't use it very well. No intelligent black would fight for racism

  • @wlomas378 So the Rebel Traitrs were run out from the south by the Loyalist Occupation armies . And whats your point it was every standered southern person who owned slaves not just the elites most had many for rapeing and shooting and torturting . The Fact is we are the Elite on the Continent. And They are from the south so they are not inteligent

  • @TThorne931 actually they surrenedered and went back to their daily lives, trying to cope with the heavy taxation the Union government unfairly levied on the struggling war-torn nation. Actually, only 6% of the population actually owned slaves. The rest were in the cities, yeoman farmers, or farmhands, and slaves were for the production of produce. If you want to shoot something, you go hunting (a southern favourite). It was the US that slaughtered native americans and illegally invaded Mexico

  • @wlomas378 no they all formed the KKK and marched in parades preaching racial hatred of the Black and American Citizen . 100% of hicks owned slaves . And hunting is better and more refined in the north unlike yo southern shit slingers we understand how guns work .and yes your point the natives were dissolute and the mexicans were from an african nation

  • @TThorne931 PA had the highest ever KKK membership rate. I'll let you interpret that. No, not all southerners joined the KKK. 100% couldn't own slaves, as there were less slaves than free people, and most owners owned 20, so that leaves none for the rest. At least I know how grammar works, and hunting is what you make of it (though I have several southern friends that would love to face you in gun trivia). The natives were the original inhabitants, and Mexicans are native/spanish mix.

  • @wlomas378 Every Southerner is and Was a member of the Klu Klux Klan it explains the Racial fighting in cities like Atlanta and New Orleans . And Slaves don't count as people in the 1860s slave South . And i don't care what your friends think just simple Shoot your friends Gut them and Hang their bodies as a symbol to the others . And Natives didn't evolve or build cities so they weren't civilized enough to survive . And spain is a black place .

  • @TThorne931 in 1864 the north had slaves as well and the civil war wasnt about slaves the south spilt off cuase of the taxes was way to high the south was payin 80% of the tax and when we split off  the north invaded the south becuse of greed and we fought back abe pinned it on slavery cuase he was gettin a bad rep so shut the fuck up yankee let the stars and bars fly[><]

  • @deagle727 Not any civilized northern states just the profligate ones , the oens lacking civility but not as much as the dissolute south . and you wern't paying 80% of the taxes those taxes were hurting New England factories . And you speak of the Savior Abraham as a bad man such is your wickedness.

  • @TThorne931 you really are a dumbass yankee aint ya and you dont really know the truth about the civil war and abe aint no savior of nothing thats why he got shot

  • @deagle727 So christ isn't a Savior because he got crucified

  • @TThorne93i didnt say he wasnt a savior cuse he got shot i said abe wasnt a savior and thats why he got shot Christ is a Savior he was meant to die for all of our sins and he rose again i dont think abe did that now did he. but abe he was just a asshole he didnt save anybody he ruined a great nation so i dont see why you called him a savior.

  • @deagle727 No your a protostant so you hate christ . Christ was redeemed for Mans Sins Lincoln was Redemmed for the Sins of the United States . He saved our nation made her strong after the Death of lincoln we bacame strong his blood made us united against facism like the south

  • @TThorne931 look I don't agree with killuminatiunited141 but Lincoln should never be considered any anyway Christ like, plus fascists like big govt. thus they like the Union more. He didn't make the U.S. strong he make the U.S. govt. strong.

  • @TThorne931 so there was only what like 2 states that was "civilized" this only proves that it was about slavery dumbass

  • @deagle727 yes Civilized Free States . But the dissolute and profligates were borught into civilization

  • @deagle727 only proves that it was not about slavery*

  • @deagle727

    "the war wasn't about slaves"

    From the DECLARATION OF CAUSES OF SECESSION "A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, & all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of Pres of the USA, whose opinions & purposes are hostile to slavery."

    Its really too bad they couldn't have dumbed down the title of that document a bit more for you.

    The CSA were immoral cowardly traitors. Fortunately their resolve matched their morality.

  • @festdir I know 1 or 2 of the states said that in their declarations that is fact i can't argue that BUT tell me how the war could have been slavery when only 6% of the souths poplulation owned slaves? If slavery was the ONLY issue there wouldn't have been a war, the war was over states rights and defending our home and family not to mention lincoln takeing many political prisoners in the NORTH for speaking out against him and shutting down 300+ newspapers for doing the same.

  • @festdir also would like to make another point about the souths resolve, if it was infact so horrible how could a smaller, poorly supplied, untrained militia not only stand up to but actually defeat it federal armies more then once? thats pretty sad if you ask me, then once the north invades the south they rape and murder hundereds of thousands (mostly blacks i might add) and destroy entire cities thorugh out the south, real liberators huh?

  • @flyingweasal007 "when only 6% owned slaves"

    6% were evil traitors. 94% was easily manipulated traitors.100% committed treason FOR slavery, as made clear in the DECLARATION OF CAUSES OF SECESSION.

    "how could a smaller"

    An army of 1.5 million subdued a population of over 9 million.

    "untrained militia"

    If only the CSA had a general. Great Point

    Finn vs USSR, Afgan vs USSR, US vs GB, Viet vs US, France & China all faced far worse odds...but none of them surrendered like cowards.

  • @festdir well lets see what to address first. A few words in the declarations of secession written by individuals for their state doesn't reflect the view of the entire south. Also as for this general you refer to, General Lee he freed his slaves before the war, long before Grant did (fact). He is also the one who convinced the tens of thousands of men still wanting to fight a long and bloody gurellia war against the federal invaders to stand down and accept defeat saveing many lives.

  • @festdir I would like to point out how opinionated your argument is where as i am simply presenting facts, like how you choose to ignore me bringing up Union slaughter of MOSTLY BLACK southern civilians and anyone who spoke out against lincoln in the north was imprisoned, and the total destruction of many towns and cities and structures not of a military nature in the south includeing homes and churches, explain that please.

  • @flyingweasal007 "opinionated your argument"

    You mean like the # of soldiers & pop.? Like the Declaration of the causes of secession? Like the results? Sorry chief, those are facts.

    "a few individuals"

    The Constitution was written by a 'few individuals' as well. Asinine argument. There is a reason it was call the DECLARATION OF CAUSES OF SECESSION.

    "accept defeat saveing [sic] many lives"

    Their pathetic cowardice was the most honorable thing about the CSA?

    I agree.

  • @festdir Each state had their own declaration you moron, and no i mean by your ignorant comments like "Their pathetic cowardice was the most honorable thing about the CSA" So there is no honor in defending your home and family, while there is in torturing rapeing and slaughter thousands civilians and destroying thousands of homes? That the honorable union liborators did a lot of which is a FACT you keep ignoreing.

  • @flyingweasal007 "Each state had their own declaration"

    And each state used the institution of slavery as justification

    "torturing, rapeing [sic, moron]"

    That is what the immoral traitors were fighting to continue to do, until decency was quickly beaten into them.

    There is a reason Sherman was called 'Moses' by freed slaves.

    There is a reason 179,000 blacks fought for the USA

    There is a reason the CSA begged for mercy. Mercy that, although unearned, was granted by their betters.

  • @festdir Im not a religous man but i don't recall Moses killing thousands of civilians and destroying many homes The south never begged for mercy and none was shown to it It amazes me how much you need a history lesson i don't see the point in continueing to present FACTS to such a simple and intolerant mind, it is like trying to convince a stuborn 5 year old that grass is infact green. You simply want to ignore the truth.

  • @flyingweasal007 "I don't recall Moses killing thousands of civilians"

    Neither did Sherman. Not that your white trash revisionism isn't convincing.

    "never begged for mercy"

    Yes they did. Thus the surrender.

    "in continueing [sic, dumbfuck] FACTS"

    I have presented the facts of numbers of soldiers, Sherman's name, the DECLARATION OF CAUSES OF SECESSION & the result of the war. You have nothing but the opinion of white trash.

    "intolerant mind"

    Like the CSA?

    Great Point, retard.

  • @festdir IM the white trash huh? even though your the one who continually insults me becuase your fibble little mind can't comprehend that the war was about slavery, and yes you did present a few facts in your rambleing and did i dispute them? no becuase they are facts i can't dispute facts unlike you who continues to try look it up for yourself, you could really use a history lesson not just for yourself but for all of us who have to put up with your intolerable ignorance.

  • @flyingweasal007 "can't comprehend that the war wasn't about slavery"

    DECLARATION OF CAUSES OF SECESSION disagrees.

    It is unfortunate the founders of the CSA couldn't have dumbed down the titles of those documents for you.

    "Pres of the US who is hostile to the institution of slavery."-SC

    "we have had numerous causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding States with reference to the subject of African slavery."-GA

    Please continue to quote yourself. It's really convincing!

  • @festdir those are only 2 states and words on paper don't hurt anyone where as union "liberators" slaughtered thousands of civilians which you keep ignoreing, i don't deny slavery was in issue in the country at the time, but it wasn't what the war was over. Just do us all a favor and go get a history lesson.

  • @flyingweasal007 "those are only 2 states"

    Then here is 2 more

    "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery"-Miss.

    "protecting the institution known as negro slavery"-TX

    Go ahead & give an example of a DECLARATION OF SECESSION instead of your uneducated opinion next time, white trash.

    "words on paper don't hurt anyone"

    Yes. Slavery "don't hurt anyone". Great argument, dumbfuck

    "[slavery] wasn't [an issue] when the war was over"

    No shit. Wonder why.

    tool

  • @festdir i havn't given anything uneducated or opinionated to you just simple facts you continue to ignore i never said slavery didn't hurt anyone i said words on paper didn't and im guessing you keep insulting me becuase you don't ACTUALLY have any other facts to use other then a few words on paper that was esentially meaningless, don't feel bad though that is what im used to from people who only think they know what their talking about

  • @flyingweasal007 "simple facts"

    I have quoted 4 founding documents of the CSA, given the numbers of Union soldiers, CSA population, Black soldiers, historical wars involving defenders...you have given nothing that can be substantiated.

    "other then [sic, dumbass] words on paper"

    Yes, if only the FOUNDING DOCUMENTS OF THE CSA had the same level of credibility as 'flyingweasal007's' word.

  • @festdir unrelated question....did your parents drop you on your head as a child? There is just no getting through your thick ignorant skull you just keep insulting my credibility and im suprised you know those 2 or 3 facts that are easily found on google, so as much as i would love to stoop to your level of intellegence i will try to be the better man and just let you keep on with your delusions.

  • @flyingweasal007 "insulting my credibility"

    Yes. Is there anything more credible than uneducated white trash on youtube comments? You got me there, smart-guy.

    "as much as i would love to stoop to your level of intellegence [sic]"

    1) You can't even spell 'intelligence'. Thank you for this. Really.

    2) 'stoop' to the level of using verifiable citations rather than your unsubstantiated opinion? Truly you are a master of debate.

    "enemy of the CSA"

    The CSA doesn't exist, dumbfuck.

  • @festdir that still doesn't explain you watching videos about something that doesn't exsist and i forgot you were my English tutor. Your just a little troll i bet this is all you do all day. It has been fun but im just giong to ignore you like you have been ignoreing the facts i have been putting in front of you.

  • @flyingweasal007 "doesn't explain you watching videos"

    Mostly to mock uneducated white trash. Thank you for your contribution.

    "Your [sic] just a little troll"

    The proper forms of 'your' & 'you're' are learned by 3rd grade & is properly used as such: "YOUR post proves that YOU'RE a goddamn retard."

    "ignoreing [sic, dumbfuck] the facts"

    You haven't posted a single fact. Apparently, you don't even know what a 'fact' is.

    How marvelous.

    Do NOT change a thing you magnificent retard!

  • @festdir ALSO if you are such an enemy of the confederacy then why are you watching videos like this?

  • @festdir Oh fuck me how emberassing i meant to say the war WASN'T about slavery im sure you will have a field day with that one.

  • Respond to this video... after reading through all of your comments, i have concluded that you are likely a troll, because no one in the civilized world could possibly be this stupid. Even my 8th grade cousin is laughing at you. Thank you for acting as a sounding board for my pro Confederate arguments and making me feel very very smart. have a nice day!

  • @wlomas378 your eight grade cousin should be raped and killed but that isn't the point . The South was evil adn remains evil and should be blockaded and eliminated saving our blessed union from republican hands for they know only evil

  • @TThorne931 yep. Definitely a troll. but to further feed you, a simple act of laughing does not warrant raping and killing. Nothing does actually. The republicans were originally the controllers of the Union. If you hate the south so much, why don't you just let it secede and be rid of it. It can't be to protect blacks from a no-longer-extant racism, as you seem to think any non-white non American is inferior.

  • @wlomas378 No bt it is payback for what your family did to your Slaves aand while your Great grand pappy was a Member of the Klu Klux Klan . Also the Republicans of lincoln are the Democrats of Today he coudn't stand with your party preaching such idiotic values as States Rights . Also No you and all your kind can get the Fuck out of North America and go live in south America the Soil is US property through the Federal Goverment . I think all southerner born are inferior

  • @TThorne931 My family never owned slaves. They were independent farmers and one inn keeper in the late 1800s. My no ancestor of mine was ever in the KKK. neither party then really resembled any party now, so the point is moot. There is nothing wrong with the devolution of authority among the states. We're the United States, not State. Sounds like you're a racist, thinking people are inferior just because they are born in the south (by the way, Lincoln was born in Kentucky; the south)

  • @TThorne931 I would have to guess this guy has the smallest dick in the world, Thumbs up if you agree.

  • @thunderbear82 see when faggots loose their argument they attack the Man with the argument

  • the south will NEVER rise again i mean hello come on look at modern day america the USA is to strong for any rebels like some southerners (no racism intended)

  • @Italamerican100 Yea we wont rise again but i do love the rebels.

  • @CM99501 i also honestly think there very cool but think they dont want to rise again they just want obama out of office like me ;)

  • @Italamerican100 guess what he is getting a second term because the repubs ain't sending any mainstream canidate

  • @TThorne931 if ur a democrat well f u if ur not i have good explenation its only fickin 2011 the election is next november

  • @Italamerican100 I am a Repub and i won't vote for any of the so called Christians or people that god dammed fag RNC is sending i will vote for Obama because eveyone of you faggots their sending are protostant bilbe thimping retards . Except rommney he like magic underwear

  • @Italamerican100 I am a Republican and you idiots are sending idiots to lead . Obama At least isn't retarded like your RNC choices

  • @TThorne931 im a republican so why are you saying im doing democrat crap?

  • @Italamerican100 RNC the Republican national convention the party is sending faggots and whores to election . For my nation my vote must go to the President 

  • @TThorne931 LOL obama is the worst thing that happened to america. your just blind like many other people the republicans are much better than him we have to be like times when ronald reagan was president the media is liberal they blind america with their lies FOX news is the only safe thing to watch

  • @Italamerican100 . Ronnie Regan He took my right to have Fully auto matic weapons away . He was a liberal Communist . Also he was a shit bin . And Obama is not that bad grover cleavlend or whilliam harrison were much more terrible to the Blessed union . And i won't watch for even as a REPUB because it is retarded protostant jacking off and lies . hurrr the HPV vaccine causes retardation . oh wait nvm we just being dramatic over it all .

  • @TThorne931 he was a conservative republican ok so he took away the right town a fully automatic weapon big FUCKING deal who actually owned one back then? he made the economy great back then. how do you call yourself republican if you talk and act like a liberal democrat? i have no fucking clue i love america and want the best for it like stop buying shit from china and build factories here for jobs

  • @Italamerican100 He fucked the Economy and funded death squads to rape Catholic nuns in nicuragua and panama . Fuck him he infringed my Right ot beat Arms . If you like regan you like takeing away people rights to bear arms . And the True Republicanis a man of eisenhower and lincoln not Regan and bush

  • @TThorne931 he did not fuck the economy and i do like lincoln and eisenhower. you are just listening to the liberal media, but what really upsets me is that we r sounding like politicians ;(

  • @Italamerican100 Then you must hate reagan as his weapons race devastated Us buisnesses when he built them up and didn't launch them and decided no more bombs no need for them and assfucked every WEP.Tech divisions . Also he took away my Right to bear arms he is a communist loving holly wood liberal

  • @TThorne931 i like reagan because he made the economy much better. he didnt take away your right to own a gun he just put on more safety regulations after he was shot at.

  • @Italamerican100

    so he is a hollywood elitiest Liberal pussy . A real conservative would take getting shot and expand gun right. So Ronnie is a Fucking Faggot San franciso cock sucker . and Tell that to the Missile Corporations after his SALT treason

  • @TThorne931 thats bs i know u'll say u'll take it but u r really a pussy like everybody else who acts tough on youtube if u were shot at i bet u frickin scream like a girl and try to make owning a gun illegal so STFU retard

  • @Italamerican100 no he is a San francisco faggot who and a california queer

  • @TThorne931 he was the one of the greatest presidents of all time he made the economy great and made using guns safer so faggots like wont do anything dangerous how u call yourself a republican and dont like Reagan is unfuckingbelievable!

  • @Italamerican100 He took away my Right To bear a fully automatic Assault Weapon He is a fucking liberal commie .he is worse then obama

  • @TThorne931 no he didnt ur just bein a ass ever watched FPSRussia? thats america he's in if it was russian wouldnt he be speaking russian in his vids?

  • @Italamerican100 Russians oddly do have the Ability to Speak Russian . And before the Faggot Reagan i could go and purchese a Machine Gun After him you need Permits and laws which are Against the 2nd Ammendment .

  • @TThorne931 permits and laws are for safety it doesnt go against the 2nd ammendment it makes it safe like make sure your 18 yrs and older ok. its for safety he didnt take away any rights ur just bein a prick

  • @Italamerican100 Only Liberal Faggots with limp wrists need permits . And he Took away my Gun Rightrs because the fag coudn't stnad being shot once by a .22 he is such a bitch for fucking over Gun Rights

  • @TThorne931 u wouldnt have been able to stand it and he didnt take away ur right and permits are needed to keep the citizens of the US safe from fags like u

  • @Italamerican100 If he wasen't a hollywood califrnoia pussy And he took away my Guns that filthy Gun banning democrat .

  • THE SOUTH NEVER ROSE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!! You guys got your ass handed to you in the Civil War and you surrendered like the dumb ass inbred cowardly fucks you really are. ITS OVER KNUCKLEHEADS!! You're now our bitch, and if we have to come back down there, we wont take prisoners next time!! Now go kiss your ugly toothless wife goodnight and eat your grits assholes.

  • Mighty bold talk. For the sake of Clarification the Confederacy killed three hundred sixty thousand Yankee invaders. I remind you the yankees took four years before General Lee for the sake of the Union surrendered. The south was preparing an insurgency the likes of which would have destroyed the Union forever. You would be well advised to do your research before you profane the spirit of the brave men of both armies. .

  • Your lack of an intelligent argument tells me that you must be the product of a Northern public education

  • Your lack of an intelligent argument tells me that you must be the product of a Northern public education. The fact that you reverted to name calling says it all you are a corward and and lacking in any character. we shall pray for you.

  • I think this experiment would solve the whole question:

    Whites should become the slaves of blacks for 400 years. 2/3 of us should die in 4x6 boxes in our own shit and blood they way blacks did. Whites should be sold like TV sets and be told they are a less developed species. Then we should suffer segregation and lynching.

    THEN we could see how WHITES hold up under the same circumstances.

    Whites would never pick up guns to defend against the rape of their women or the sale of their children!

  • @HopeForPeaceNow Here's a post by Zionist Occupation Government.

  • @HopeForPeaceNow

    В то время как остальной мир смеется с их прикладами.

  • @HopeForPeaceNow What does this statement even mean? If somebody tries taking even another persons wife or children I would defend them. So I guess your statement is not true after all. And that last part that I'm refering to has nothing to do with the first part of your statement. Your comment conveys no real point or meaning.

  • @branman864

    Firstly, I'm appealing to your compassion.

    If you personally, or whites as a race had suffered at the hand of blacks for 400 years under same kind of system, just black superiority, in the same manner, would YOU still want the battle flag of black superiority flown over you.

    Put yourself in the plae of a black American in South, would you think it a disrespect? If your family had been sold and segregated under it would YOU want it to fly over your state?

    Pretty strait forward.

  • @HopeForPeaceNow Actually I would like to point out first of all that the "Confederate Flag" as most people recognize it was actually the naval jack. Second of all there are black people with sense who understand that the south was preserving states rights. I fly the stars and bars on my house with a pole in front with the stainless banner and third national on it.

  • "naval jack. " bran

    Yes, it was the second navel jack. It's also the undisputed battle flag.

    'south was preserving states rights."

    The south was preserving states rightsnto own people. Please be clear. From the 3/5s to the 1850 and Missouri compromises, the South had been fighting for expanded rights for slavery. The fugitive slave act (a denial of Northern states rights NOT to return slaves) and the election of Lincoln were the last straw. States rights to own people, don;t leave that out.

  • @HopeForPeaceNow You do uinderstand that the law that made it illegal for somebody to not return runaway slaves was passed during the time period when the North was in control of Congress as weremany other laws of that kind, the North and the South share equal blame for slavery and the founders share blame for not making a decision in their time as well.

  • @branman864

    The North passed the fugitive slave act?

    I believe that's as likely as conservatives raising taxes on the Elite today. But, it's a new one on me, I'll look that up.

    "the founders share blame for not making a decision in their time as well."

    This is true. The seeds of the civil war are found there.

    "North and the South share equal blame for slavery"

    This is a fallacy. By 1840 there was a strong abolitionist movement in the north and a desire to fight FOR it iin the South.

  • @HopeForPeaceNow I wouldn't ever fight to abolish slavery nor would I fight to maintain it.

  • "I wouldn't ever fight to abolish slavery" branman864

    I have no doubt.

    That's my point.

    Are you a pacifist?

  • @HopeForPeaceNow Now you're taking me out of context. You can obviously see I said "I wouldn't ever fight to abolish slavery nor would I fight to maintain it"