Added: 1 year ago
From: airboyd
Views: 181,983
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (299)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • spake access..

  • is this shit caused the heat in moscow? Ok wait the heat above the pentagon!))

  • Im pretty sure chuck norris was piloting this thing.

  • @whateever876543 It's unmanned so you must be stupid.

  • check where was the X37B at the right moment of the last April 7th earthquake in Japan watch in you tube: New X-37B Space Weapon Triggers new 7.4 Earthquakes Japan? - Reupload from HaarpWillNOTbeSilent

  • @muxadi I'm sure it was wherever the writer needed it to be. I'd be more deferential to your kind of stupidity if China had been hit instead of Japan.

  • @1st503rdSGT I could be naif or ignorant, but not stupid.......more stupid was your mother that didn´t abort U...gringo de mierda, que jugas al soldadito y te crees importante y solo eres un pobre soberbio, al que le lavaron el cerebro

  • @muxadi Maybe you haven't heard of iGoogle yet. I can read your pathetic Latin-American rantings. Let me try it out. Puto troll comer frijol perra. mujeres latinas puta el culo al aire necesitas tapones vagina. Did the program get it right?

  • @1st503rdSGT of course i have heard, my English maybe is bad , but you need a macchine......i write it directly, ....what are you gone do when macchines are off.....and it is near...

  • @muxadi When the machines go off, I'll probably starve to death like most of the planet's population. Although... I am well armed enough to become one of those bloodthirsty bandits that you Latinos seem to be so fond of ;-)

  • coming up next how the CIA destroyed the twin towers and blame it on towelheads

  • Go Air force!

  • Coming up next... what really hit the Pentagon building!

  • The Pentagon channel....oh dear......

  • And this is why I want to join the Air Force. Sorry NASA, you guys are soon to be a thing of the past...

  • Military?? Intended for a test platform? Or carrying nuclear bombs??

  • @solimiansky i hope u get killed by a american !!

  • the military has no business in space

  • @cobra1518

    you do know that it was because of military's and war that we have all the technology we have today right?

    and at least the Air Force is trying to pick up all the slack NASA now has left for the US's space program

  • It is much more effective and cheaper for USA to launch things in space for this. Beter this way when dont need rockets anymore. Anyway lauching space someting else than satellites is waisting of money... Get moon and back... all wasiting a lot of coins. Consentrate beter use tax money for take care own peoples first there in US. Exploring space anyway feels cool and exiting, but important things first.

  • USA Military fear it been shooted down by some country and salvaged if first flight been public countryes could try find it where it go.

  • the secrecy is scary ... what is the military up to now?

  • @snorkellisab It's payload bay looks too small to be a real military asset. It probably is just a research vehicle like the military says. A larger version launched on a Delta IV heavy would make a handy on-demand spy satellite that they could bring back and update periodically.

  • @1st503rdSGT Then, I wonder way the extreme secrecy?

  • @snorkellisab Nothing extreme about it. It's no more secret than the typical spy satellite project (maybe even less so). It just gets more attention because it looks like a space shuttle instead of a big foil box.

  • @1st503rdSGT I understood the secrecy, until recently, be be very tight. If it's just a spy camera platform, why doesn't the military acknowledge that? Perhaps they don't want to admit the extreme cost. I imagine many defense contractors got stinking rich off this pork barrel.

  • @snorkellisab Once the shuttle retires, the U.S. will be left with almost no dependable means of lifting payloads to space and returning them to Earth (an important capability to maintain). The X-37 is too small to carry or steal useful satellites, but it's big enough to carry experiments and reusable instruments that wouldn't be feasible on a capsule spacecraft. The USAF would probably be using something like this already had it not been supporting the shuttle program for so long.

  • @1st503rdSGT that's why they are looking to the Russians for help.

  • All it needs is a dextrous set of clawhands and it can hook micro-chips smaller than a finger nail into the circuitry of Foreign satellites...imagine, NetCentric warfare for us+a live feed of other countries netcent operations in REALTIME. Brother, this is going2(already has)kick some ass for the good ol' USA! Hey J-20, Berkut, PAK FA, etc...."We already know where you are!" This is a PERFECT weapon. Test 1 was2loiter undetected in space for 8mnths. Sounds like a Weapon, huh?

  • Anyhow, why let'um know what we've really got cookin'. I've seen with my eyes (I know mil planes, I was in Afgh. in the start)B2,F22,Comanche StealthCopter(cancelled 2004, spotted in '07),I saw a "UFO".Few hrs from WhitemanAfB, year 2000,2100 hours,clear night.3 Stars started2fly, having been just 3in a million.They were really pnts on tips of an ENORMOUS blacktriangle(Size: 2 aircraft carriers easily).It had hovered unnoticed! It moved in silence,gliding so unearthly.UFO!Aliens!!!!

  • @snorkellisab Yeah, the price of this will be absurd. It's amazing how people talk about ending social security, that collects more than it pays out, when the US discretionary spending is a whopping 17% of tax expenditure. Fancy that, the US could have a de-facto surplus if it just cut the stuff it won't say what it's spending on lol.

  • @CmdrTobs I wonder what this costs, and what the essential benefits will be. Or, is it needed at all? Perhaps it's been kept under wraps so govt doesn't have to explain the expenditure? Mean while, schools hold bake sales and raffles for needed supplies. USA is Toast

  • @CmdrTobs Yep, social progs are drops in the bucket visavis "defense". But, the HUGE$amounts going2 black projects really are not as wastefully spent as they seem. Every project you hear about costing "100 billion, 50.75 million,etc." is not really the place where that figure is all being spent. Cardinal rule of Secret Development, keep it secret. They ask4the blood of our labor for F22, but believe me, it did NOT cost that much.The money funnels into so many dif. projects..same with this.

  • Price is ALWAYS extreme 4DARPA stuff,but..If ANY weaponry is needed, this1is! It ISN'T for Science (cover), but a counter measure to ensure the survivability of the Electronic Brain USMil.relies on. If a conventional war starts,1st target of any US Foe will be this. In this case the costs r justified.GPS, NetcentWar/datashare r our Spine militarily.37X's"loitered" UNDETECTED4 8months,(bugs placed,viral charges+disinfo.interference devices ALREADY wired in2 opponent milsats!!!)

  • Its NOT a recon/intel sat. at all. It's clearly response to Chinese+Russian plans to hit us with Cyber, Anti-Satellite missiles,energy weapons etc.A Potentially mortal slash across Achilles heel of US power. Everybody knows,USMil's Netcentric "without failsafes!" Obviously, planners are aware of that vulnerability, and my guess is that this plane has already compromised MilSats of both countries. Smart, but not hard4cyberintelligent XPlane.BTW,who knows its capabilities?what it's up to?Ergo... .

  • @1st503rdSGT t is VERY extreme technically,but also tactically! See, satellites do not fly zigzagging,guided paths (undetected by everyone!) all the time. Usually only slight thruster adjustments are made to change their direction. This thing was lost to astronomers almost immediately.This is what Aforce Brass r so hot about! This is a wolf in sheeps clothing, a space drone of latest gen. tech. A WARBIRD. It isn't reco tasked at all! Its4WAR,against countries using milsats. Anti-Sat=it's role.

  • @newmanfrigan Yeah, I sure the microbiologist is an expert on orbital mechanics. As ASAT weapons go, the X-37 is about as inefficient as you can get; there are much cheaper options like the SM-3 missile or THAAD already available. As for shifting orbits, no spacecraft that size can carry enough fuel to make changes more drastic than several other spacecraft, past and present (eg. Apollo, Gemini, the shuttle, Soyuz, Progress, Shenzhou were/are all able to shifting orbits in similar manner.)

  • For all the naysayers commenting here, the X-37B has just returned to earth after weeks in orbit.

  • Would anyone know what altitude this vehicle is capable of reaching? Could this be the solution for resupplying the ISS (with everything except warm bodies) now that the Space Shuttle is taking its final bow?

    Given the inherent risks of shuttles vis-a-vis expendable rockets, it seems like using rockets for humans and shuttles for the carrying the bulk of non-human payloads into LEO may strike the ideal balance. Am I wrong?

  • @TroyOi - It's a spacecraft, altitude is irrelevant. This may be using the new VASIMR Plasma Engine technology.

  • @blkcola Hmmm. I had a sense "altitude" was the wrong word to use, but just couldn't think of the right one. So what is it? Anyway, if you're knowledgeable about space travel, you know what I mean: what level of Earth orbit is this craft capable of reaching? And specifically, can it reach the ISS?

    Now that I think of it, there are other considerations regarding orbit accessibility, such as shape of orbit (degree of ellipticity), and how far off the equatorial plane it is.

  • @TroyOi idk a whole lot, but Nasa's been working on a new high altitude mid-air refueling jet, designed for it's "robot plane" which looks almost exactly like an x37b without the swept wing. they say it's for drones only, though I have no doubt they could outfit this vehicle to discreetly extend the mission life of any of these x37s(which have giant booster rockets plainly in the design)

  • @TroyOi - The VASMIR engine videos are saying that it's "Deep Space" capable; and certainly capable of transport to ISS. NASA's LaViolette is claiming that they will soon be able to do runway takeoff instead of rocket launch. Here's the LaViolette Video: v=eBhsz3iXgGk

  • @blkcola Well, VASIMR certainly is deep space-capable, but getting into deep space, or even LEO, is a whole different ball of wax. And the concept of a VASIMR engine and a "runway takeoff" are at opposite ends of the thrust-to-weight spectrum. X-37B relies on other vehicles to take it to orbit, & that's not changing anytime soon. For now, the idea of independent takeoff for the X-37B belongs in the sci-fi realm, notwithstanding whatever this LaViolette fellow may say.

  • @blkcola I don't wanna get into an argument with you, but for the benefit of other readers, I will point out two things:

    1) LaViolette does not now, nor has he ever, worked for NASA;

    2) He is generally considered a crackpot in the mainstream scientific community.

    Now I am not passing judgment on LaViolette or his (many) theories here. I am merely setting the record straight on who he is and how he is regarded by the science community.

  • @TroyOi - Keep in mind that the VASIMR is a converted jet engine. The electrogravitics crowd is making some wild claims, but whats to say that the engine can't be converted to multi- fuel/function. Quote: "According to Moray King's work, a rotating plasma produces a gravity-vector. Orient the vector away from the Earth's surface and you have levitation, or degravitation, earth lift-off."

  • @blkcola Degravitation??? Yikes!

    You've already forced me to learn more than I want to know about VASIMR and LaViolette, so I'm not going to start reading up on Moray King. (Maybe you could preface future references to scientists with a note about whether they're considered mainstream or fringe.)

    Anyway, from what I've seen, VASIMR, like any other space propulsion technology, produces simple, run of the mill, boring, old-fashioned thrust.

  • @TroyOi - This One Hour Video might interest you: "War on Cold Fusion - The Hidden Truth Exposed" v=7FilflaqbVI - Thanks for the feedback; and you take care...

  • Yank Assoles!

    This was copied from russians from klipper!

    realy stupidest nation of this fucking world. yanks go home biatches!

  • @Russia2010 EAT YOUR OWN SISTERS ASS :D (WEIRD ???) :D

    RUSSIANBIATCH

    LONG LIVE USA GREETINGS FROM KOSOVO

  • @dhomtepushkes

    die fucking camelfucker!

  • so the airforce is sending unmanned aircrafts to space..um sound like star wars

  • Not only explortation, this research will feed back directly into commercial space applications which will make us a permanently space faring society. Eventually, Ad Astra!

  • The shuttle program was a sham since day one since we have had the technology since the 1960s to go far beyond the moon. The shuttle was a great way to distract people into thinking that was our advancement. Amazing how people buy into the space shuttle crap when it doesn't take much common sense in wondering why we would have stopped traveling into space at the moon.

  • @usnavy907 Quite simply, expense and danger. Considering the Apollo 11 astronauts knew they had a 40% chance of survival, by today's standards, such dangerous missions would never get a green light. You know how much the Apollo missions cost the US right? One QUARTER of the GDP over ten years! That's a couple of trillion in adjusted dollars. Obviously unsustainable.

    The Shuttle was supposed to be cheap. Didn't quite work out that way.

    Don't comment if you don't know your facts.

  • @karadan100

    Explortion and advances in technology have always come at the cost of some life; It's a necessary evil. And those taking part understand that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few- or the one. I hate to quote ST- The Wrath of Khan but the line is approrpriate in this case.

  • @uncleezra1 I completely agree. They just don't take those kinds of risks anymore.

  • @karadan100

    I'd say Columbia rates. Too bad it was such an unnecessary risk- at least they got it right on later flights.

  • @usnavy907 The shuttle was the workhorse of nasa you ignoramus. 115+ launches sending countless satellites and gps units all used today for communication worldwide.

  • What a gargantuan waste of money.

  • @aegisforex It is only a waste in the eyes of people who don't understand the benefits science like this can bring to humanity.

    For every dollar spent on space exploration, ten is made back in scientific breakthroughs and patents.

    What a gargantuan ignoramus you are..

  • and orbital bombing with DU.

  • X-37B is in space. NASA might not being getting the funds. But the U.S. is still way ahead of every other nation

  • @assoonas1

    I don't doubt that we have on-going black projects that far exceed the capabities of projects such as the X37b, but they are military projects that are using technologies that can't be uncovered yet without comprimising defense security. The X-37 B studies don't fall into this category and results can be released directly to the commercial space transportation companies and engineering firms which, even though at a slower pace, keeps us moving ahead.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • to fight the war, sounds awesome . against that ? aliens?

  • @aisteroman

    Nothing that dramatic. How about being able to put a batallion of Marines anywhere on Earth in less than an hour? I think you'll agree that's quite a deterrant to human rights violations or terrorist organizations.

  • Its things like this that makes a persons comment about us losing the war sound ridiculous. Lets see some towel heads launch a pile of shit into space. They cant even aim for the toilet.

  • too bad about the X-33 that was a cooler concept that x-37b

  • @smoluk1

    I think they started too big and the theory behind the X-33 would have let out too much classified black project materials. The X 37 b allows us to release some of what we know in a more responsible fashion.

    Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have seen the X-33 project completed, but I'd give my right arm for a look at Aurora, too. And that ain't going to happen anytime soon.

  • I thought the new space craft will get an aerospike rocketboost.

  • @LunaticQuutamo

    We may see that yet - the Scaled Composite White Knight drops are only from 40,000 feet. In it's final form, I don't think it will b aunched on an Atlas Agena. I think that far less ground support would be needed for a carrier aircraft launch than a launch from on top of a rocket.

  • CHINESE ASTRONAUT TO THE MOON ?

  • Blah blah blah Bill Cooper told us your already 50plus yrs ahead of the world. If that's not true then someone explain TEDtalk lol. Scary.

  • Air Force To Launch First X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle 22 April 2010 is one of the film I have ever enjoyed. enjoy Air Force To Launch First X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle 22 April 2010 on this great site : qui8ckfre8emovi8e.8co8m ( Without the 88 )

  • Cool spacefighters just put a laser and a few tungsten rods on it and away ya go, need a hyderdrive do but ya could put a nuclear reactor in it I suppose with an ion drive that would be amazing!!

  • Ehh, they are just surgar coating an excuse to expand our military... be real with the people.

  • @IamDuhmb I agree 100%.

  • Its all the same personality of science since cavemen learnt to use the jaw of an ass to pulverise each other's brains with. Nothing has changed except the increase in knowledge and with it, the increase in the scope and spectrum of destruction. Boeing is run by a subspecies of boggarts, shape-shifters that can only exist effectively in the dark

  • Goodbye astronauts....

  • The Pentagon Channel!?!?!?! lol!!! WOWZERS! I will never believe ANYTHING at face value from this channel EVER! I guarantee behind that camera is a guy with a glass eye, bottle of whiskey, and a sexy secretary holstering a pistol.... :S

  • not only do we get to destroy our planet but now we get to destroy space too!!!!! I LOVE AMERICA! hahahah

  • usa will rule the space in the future

  • This is the start of something bigger I predict america will rule the galaxy!!

    Look out world they might build A death star next. 'I love star wars"

  • India is also making one

  • @manoman2u ..yes, and its going to rain super spicy curry all over the world.

  • X-37 - an experimental apparatus. Model "mini-shuttle." He has a hold capacity of 2 cubic meters and a payload v900 kg. At the X-37. What will happen to "normal" shuttle?

  • okay you guys are missing the point- istead of worrying about the guys speaking issues- although funny- realize we can have an aircraft in outer space that can help us in war! reconisis aircraft , any t5hing from past or atmoshere its crazy!

  • They are doing a Dungeons and Dragons briefing?

  • did u c manana . lt jokes?

  • If you are interested in purchasing a powerful Gaming PC that can dominate on an game, send me a PM with your budget and I can build a custom computer that will suit your needs.

  • yay i want my 1:29 back

  • Hmmm....so the military is mainly in control of this little space plane, it systems are still top secret, it's mission is hush-hush. If I didn't know any better, I'd say it's a space based weapon system. It looks too small to carry any but the smallest satellite or cargo for the ISS but big enough for a HEL weapon........

    Further obsevation is needed to validate the rumors.

  • @BlueKyne lol Notice that the funding didn't go to NASA this time...

  • @CaptainAndrew1991 Nasa is getting out of the space flight business. they are a muslim outreach program now.

  • @kdraper2007 NASA arnt getting out of spaceflight, they are getting rid of the shuttles cos they are getting too old to maintain and they cannot afford new ones.

    they are working on the ARES rockets again cos they are 5 times cheaper to launch than the shuttles are atm. but the ARES V can lift more weight. while ARES I is used for crew transfers.

    they still arnt ready yet, but the shuttles are in such bad shape they are off lining them already

    so the ruskies are doing the flying for now.

  • @BlueKyne It's think there's some kind of Convention or agreement that made it a no-no to build extra-orbital weapons platforms.

  • All this talk about frusters is leaving me trusfrated.

  • @supressorgrid my video is so much cooler: search OFFICER PRICK

  • lOLOLLLOL SAW THIS ON videogrip(.)tk  remove the ()

  • yeah thats what we just needed...dam Im glad they build it....WHAT A FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT...THERE MORE PROBLEMS IN THIS PLANET AND THEYRE FUCKING AROUND WITH THIS SHIT?

  • spake access

  • this is the earth first real star fighter cool.

  • LOL @ Mecha82...That's the first time I've seen a speech impediment reveal itself on the keyboard...Daffy Duck was always my favorite.

  • damn this is one exciting channel

  • -

    F- False

    E- Evidence

    A- Appearing

    R- Real

  • @azis1100 first encounter assut recon

  • @azis1100 No this is real!

  • @azis1100 ...Thank you Gary Busey.

  • @ToadsMGodes Got your Gary Busey riiiight here~

    img521(.)imageshack(.)us/img52­1/1101/garybuseymonsters(.)gif

    -

    MUAHAHAHAAAHAHAAAaaaa~!

  • @azis1100 Its a weapon,but I thought space warfare was illigal?

  • @USMCjunior117 What weapon? It's a spacecraft. a mini spaceshuttle. the airforce had to do something since Nasa is getting out of the space flight business. without the shuttles, the Air Force has no way to service & refuel recon sats, or launch GPS satellites, or do any of the other things required to protect American orbital space.

  • @kdraper2007 It is testing out a weapon,look it up,some things you do not know about this country,and also look up the kitty hawk.

  • get real...our grandsons will never live on mars or leave our solar system... too busy cleaning our mess

  • @azis1100

    its just pathetic to see that his reaction is highest rated. not really contributing to anything.

    The last thing we need is people like him.

    And he gets credits??

    whats wrong with people. And what do you mean by fear. Cause i always find people frightened that illusionate scientific truths. Your probably somebody that hoaxes any sciene movie. Well congratulations. Your effort contributes to humanity and a better living........not

    its just like the second highgest rated comment belo

  • @Armigo91 I'd like to be the first one to tell you, go fuck yourself. You stupid, crybaby, cinnamon-soy-latte, emo, bitch...

    /watch?v=NibVqaheSEQ

  • i mean supressorgrid is alteast honest. He says it gets him frustrated. And since frustration goes along with fear, more frequently then without fear i do not really get the hoaxing messages.

    its good to see that such technology develops.

    Its painfull that developments are made trough such overall ignorance.

    Your just like a poor farmer from the 1600s that believed the earth to be the center of the universe.

    man you guys are crap.

  • they made this lie to impress people. That worthless aircraft is just a waste of gas.

  • @Ganxiba every aircraft is a waste of gas, but you know what, this is a first real star fighter that they've developed.

  • R.I.P ANDY MEYERS!!!!!!! Poor lost soul..ANDY MEYERS killed himself in the movie Moment of Truth The Andy Meyer Story! He was a really great guy =(

  • They've had advanced ET technology for sometime now. Why hav'nt they reverse engineered it so they could quit using primitive rockets.

  • Let me guess Air Force wants "transfer" nuclear weapons to space? Oh Cool lets militarize space. Shit is enough thinking some terrorist gonna blow us up but now we gotta fear some nation dropping shit from space?

  • @RouteMask

    Nukes are already dropped from space.  They're called ICBMs and they're nothing new.

  • maybe we'll colonize other planets if we find oil there

  • Go AirForce

  • "spake" lol anyone else catch that?

  • damn it WHEN ARE WE GONNA COLONIZE OTHER PLANETS !!!!!

  • everyone knows the airforce wants these so they can put missiles on it.

  • Question is, when do we see spacecraft that dosen't use old fashioned rocket frusters as main propellant? Ion fruster has been already invented and it could be used with rocket frusters to increase acceleration.

  • @Mecha82

    ion engines are overly expensive

  • @karambiatos

    Well nothing is free and those old rocket engine using shuttles don't surely help to advange space exploration at all. Currently what NASA is doing is basically waste of money.

  • @Mecha82 Ion Engines deliver a very weak thrust though, its just that they can do it over a long period of time. They're not likely to be used as a main engine to bring spacecraft out of the atmosphere, in the near future that is. It will be interesting to see what NASA and certain private companies will do in with the technology once it becomes slightly less experimental.

  • @Mecha82

    Ion propulsion in current designs is basically movement by a billion cuts. It's incapable of providing usable thrust within any significant enivronment of gravity. Rockets, by contrast, are like a one punch knockout. They have an incredible thrust to weight ratio, so much so as to utterly defeat and shame gravity, but suffer from a lack of stamina and are quickly exhausted.

    The true replacement for rockets has to keep the strengths while removing weakness.

  • @AxisAnalysis

    There is no reason why those two could not be used together. Rocket engines could break gravity and give that needed starting speed while ion engines then continue there from that speed. After all in space object continues to go to that direction with that speed that it was send there. There is no reason why those two could not be used together to eliminate each others weakness. Actually Devinvollmer also mentioned this.

  • @Mecha82 ion thrusters have very little power, it's more of a way for long distance space travel for the fuel efficiency but it has nearly no power even in space, with the limited technology at the moment creating any sort of ion engine thrust to get a vehicle into even the upper atmosphere would be impossible

  • @Mecha82 Two reasons... 1. Ion thrusters require LARGE amounts of electrical energy to accelerate the ionized gas (fuel) which (almost) means that a nuke power sourch is needed. 2. Ion thrusters produce very small amounts of thrust which can extended for very long times. This makes them ideal for "Deep Space" missions. Simple rockets produce strong thrust in short bursts, which is what is needed for de-orbiting and changing orbits.

  • @Mecha82 You mean thruster? As for that they also designed a nuclear propelled thrust mechanism but you don't see that either.

  • @Mecha82 Ion thruster aren't truly effective unless the craft is intended to travel extremely long distances. In this application, Ion thrusters would serve almost no purpose.

  • @CaptainAndrew1991 Ion Thrusters are complete shit. That is a dead technology. Find a better one IMO.

  • @Mecha82 Exactly what i was thinking.

  • @Mecha82 i think they should look at maglev technology to get the vehicle moving at mach speed before they even think about lighting the candle

  • @Mecha82 frustrating isn't it

  • @Mecha82 ion thrusters are only, at their current stages usable in a vacuum environment and in 2011 plasma based ion thrusters are scheduled to be put on the International space station to lift it up, as it is in LEO(low earth orbit) and has a steadily declining orbit around the earth

  • we in your space, bombing you from there

  • jeah man

  • No don't

  • once again gentlemen, we are the badass' of the world.

  • cool.

  • The pentagon channel?!?!

    oh boy

  • into the effort to make spake XD

  • I like how I can watch him read the script right in front of my eyes! It's so engaging!

  • its not gonna blow now is it? man I wish NASA and the ARMY would try fundraisers to get money for their toys

  • @TrueYears agreed, a good yard sale should do the trick

  • LOL you guys watch out for obama he dos not ant the USA to be strong,, you guys can xpect some hangky panky from obama

  • @NiteAngel it's better than someone who's more concerned with how much vacation time he get in his term. what are you doing to make us strong? bitching about Obama because you don't understand why things are happening the way they are?

  • @VoDKaVicious please tell us why obama is kissing up to dictators why he is harassing Israel, why is he trying hard to make Puerto Rico a state lol he is looking for democrats for votes, i bet hahalol Immigration reform, Million of votes for the democrats lets find out how many Muslims are working our Oil Platforms, OH no thats politically incorrect, hey why all the radicals as czars under Obammmma if you think our Air Force has nothing to worry about your wrong MR. obama lover

  • @NiteAngel if you have a way to neutralize a potential threat diplomatically & prevent possible future wars(that is still inevitable) even if it's just for a generation or 2, you do it... even if it looks weird or fucked up to anyone. ...

  • @NiteAngel & of course he's looking to dems for votes, that's what you do in any political position like that. if it was McCain, he'd be pandering to reps for votes to pass his shit. politics is a dangerous creature that you have to work just right to make things work out for the better. in order to get to the good shit, sometimes you have to deal with shit you don't like. ex: work. hardly anyone likes it... but you do it anyway because you want to reap the benefits.

  • @NiteAngel & i wouldn't call myself an obama lover. i simply believe that 1. he at the very least deserves a chance & 2. he knows what he wants to get done & has a plan(more or less) to do it. why don't you see how things turn out. it is still early.

  • @VoDKaVicious

    Ever heard of Ron paul (republican party) or Peter shiff (economist)

    he probably knows what he wants but i doubt its for the good of the people

  • @cookiekoen The republicans were in the white house for how many years and in that time all they did was fuck over the american workers of this country - so here we have someone that sees the needs of the people - not like the republicans that only sees the need of the rich and corporations that have fucked the ameriacn people over - Do the American public want to live the nightmare the republicans have created over the years - I think not -