Added: 2 years ago
From: Crysis4Ever123
Views: 10,676
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the pc version will probably look a bit better. but the console versions are always more fun, and you dont need to worry about that your system cant handle it, ps3 FTW!

  • look a bit better? will look a LOT better (more than you can think). and to play with graphic as low as console, you dont need a super gaming pc...console game are stretched 720p with less effect. and why more fun? everyone who have the chance to have a gaming pc say that FPS are wayy better on pc. some game like uncharted are just better for a controller.

    but pc is the ultimate fps platform

    and yes... ps3 FTW! :P

  • :/ actually PC version will look much better. the PS3 and xbox 360 run mainly on settings equivilent to the mainstream setting on the PC version. and if you look at Cry 2 engine and Crysis, the difference between mainstream and high is astounding! also the gameplay on PC people bump for not having controllers, truth be told I use an xbox 360 controller for the PC. I play it like an xbox 360 too with my music blasting and a multimedia remote next to me :D

  • this is more like cry engine 2.5 if you look at crysis at its max graphics again! :(

    btw, it wont need as much hardware as crysis needed xD

  • finally they implanted real time reflections T_T right in time

  • nice to see a little "preview" of what environment Crysis 2 might have :p

    Nice visuals though - can't wait to see this engine rendering on a PC :D

  • I wish I have a pc to play thoose games that will come...

  • Is that really important for performance change into quality?

    Reduced FPS: 0.11, 1.58

    The HDR indeed nice btw, see differences between Xbox360 and ps3 in 0.55. Ps3 are much more realistic.

    Horrible slow-mo 1.31 shadows fall down as all u can see it. Also 2.21 also has shadow are extremely distracting.

    Are these stimulation are suitable to PS3 and Xbox360 to have 60 maximum Fps?

    By the way, PC are rox.

    This stiumuation are sux for both consoles.

  • thats why i have a high-end pc and a ps3

    =D.

  • That waterfall was amazing!

  • 1:31 look at the palm tree's shadow , wtf? slow motion?

  • yeah good thing spotting it,it seems like the shadow maps update time is a bit low.maybe it will be fine in the final release.

  • The PS3/X360 version sucks. The video equivalent middle-to-lower detail settings and some effects of light to cap limitations.

  • but is worse on a mid-low end pc, lol.

  • i know PS3 is way expensive but it looks so much better than the 360. and don't even try to defend the 360, its getting old and anyways the PS3 went fairly all-out on the hardware. microsoft cut back to be more cost-effective.

  • That assertion is without any factual merit. The reason is the PS3 is more expensive is because of the expensive white elephant Blu Ray drive Sony were determined to put on it so they could win the HD format wars (which no one seems to care about now Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Netflix et all do online content delivery). It remains very cheap for a Blu Ray player, but very expensive for a console.

  • and therefore it is an excellent deal, cheap blu ray + game console.

    also, too, i would like to point out that this was a sociology project and i thank you for participating. the premise is that people cannot resist a bait, no matter how obvious it is. i have put down over 6,012 baits in forums and blogs all across the internet within the past months and as of right now, 4,232 have been taken.

    for the record i have neither. PC's are far more agile than consoles.

  • You know what's retarded? People who argue about consoles on the internet and think that anyone actually cares about what they have to say... Just play the games. Who cares if one system runs a micro-percentage faster or if it has some ridiculous contrast ratio that no one will ever notice, because no one is sitting in their rooms playing the same game on to simultaneous systems. At the end of the day a good game is just that no matter what you play it on. Same goes for the PC dorks out there.

  • i agree with you. why can't they look beyond price and not take the ps3 for granted, it's a great console and really advanced, i'm sure they can all get their hands on one to if they weren't being so stubborn

  • no matter xbox 360 or PS3, both lag a bit in this video :) both are crap... PC for the win!!!

  • you know what else is retarded? people who get offended by other people having a discussion on the internet about their opinions on what game systems they like better. at the end of the day, a good game is a good game. PC dorks just spend more time thinking about how they can get their money's worth.

    PC's are way better, IMHO.

  • Yes but the others are just game systems.. Sure they have turned into multi-media devices, but PC's are so much more than that. They're open and free not constrained by what microsoft/sony/nintendo wants them to do.

  • hmmmm if bethesda is gonna release elder scrolls 5 in 2010,dont u guys think they should show it at this years GDC?

  • I think it's a shame they use a skybox for the console versions...

  • sehr sehr geiles video ;-)

    mfg phoenix from HQ ^^

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more