The first reach stacker I drove was a PPM from France , we had and they always kept breaking down. We had a ram collapse and fold in half crushing the cabin , luckily the driver got out ok. The Fantuzzi reach stackers were like driving a rolls Royce . We don't have them anymore , we have Hyster forklifts which lift 45 t , they have heaps of bugs from brand new . They are governed to 15 km/h loaded , even with an empty on , very frustrating .
There slow, we use the 46tons stacker similar to the model here in the vid> (i work at BCT container terminal)
I find it handy but yet amazingly slow. But capeable of lifting 45ton.
What you see in the demo is not even that impressive empty 40vt container weighs about 5 ton.
I rather play with the 18 ton, container handlers (trucks) that stack 7 high, were the reachstacker cant even come. More fun is 4 moving 4 (!!) 20feet containers at once with the truck XD
It does better than the older cranes and I would say this machine can stack loads four or five high. the nice thing with it you can reach a container in the second row where as old type modals you couldn't do that.
The stacker here it looks very similar to ours is similar to stack approx 5 high max, at minimal extending it can lift a good 45 tons, when extending it will drop fast. But a good 5 to 10 ten tons is not on max reach is not to be taken lightly.
I hate the 6 cylinder cummins engine tho in the reach stackers of hyster. The tend to smoke allot (6500 hours use)
hey i see what u mean wit the hysters we had a hyster reach stacker the engine blew 6 times so we sold it ogt a cvs ferrai reach stacker which is ok when it decides not to break down but my fav machine is the smv reach stacker it rarley breaks down and is a brill machine
Kalmar Reach Stackers were the best...
edq2764 1 year ago
The first reach stacker I drove was a PPM from France , we had and they always kept breaking down. We had a ram collapse and fold in half crushing the cabin , luckily the driver got out ok. The Fantuzzi reach stackers were like driving a rolls Royce . We don't have them anymore , we have Hyster forklifts which lift 45 t , they have heaps of bugs from brand new . They are governed to 15 km/h loaded , even with an empty on , very frustrating .
MrWillyworm1969 1 year ago
its a pretty modern machine i drive a cvs ferrari container stacker and it is such a good machine to operate
sntch123 3 years ago
There slow, we use the 46tons stacker similar to the model here in the vid> (i work at BCT container terminal)
I find it handy but yet amazingly slow. But capeable of lifting 45ton.
What you see in the demo is not even that impressive empty 40vt container weighs about 5 ton.
I rather play with the 18 ton, container handlers (trucks) that stack 7 high, were the reachstacker cant even come. More fun is 4 moving 4 (!!) 20feet containers at once with the truck XD
muziekfreak1980 2 years ago
It does better than the older cranes and I would say this machine can stack loads four or five high. the nice thing with it you can reach a container in the second row where as old type modals you couldn't do that.
cnrailman2 3 years ago
so much easyer than when I operated the mobile cranes wow
cnrailman2 3 years ago
But does it do the same job?? Like what if you gotta pack something up high??
Claviale 3 years ago
The stacker here it looks very similar to ours is similar to stack approx 5 high max, at minimal extending it can lift a good 45 tons, when extending it will drop fast. But a good 5 to 10 ten tons is not on max reach is not to be taken lightly.
I hate the 6 cylinder cummins engine tho in the reach stackers of hyster. The tend to smoke allot (6500 hours use)
muziekfreak1980 2 years ago
hey i see what u mean wit the hysters we had a hyster reach stacker the engine blew 6 times so we sold it ogt a cvs ferrai reach stacker which is ok when it decides not to break down but my fav machine is the smv reach stacker it rarley breaks down and is a brill machine
sntch123 2 years ago
buena exibicion
romico1973 3 years ago