This psychopath declared an ETERNAL WAR on America after the so-called 'war of independence'. When you see a president receiving a knighthood from these royal criminals, you got to wonder who's running the shop America....
You make a strong argument for King George III and his reaction to the revolution/rebellion. I guess we are miss-informed. Sadly it seems he is the face behind our resentment during this time in our history. You were correct we Americans seem very misinformed about King George. We seem to excuse parliament and put the entire blame on the king. We have a natural distaste for monarchs I guess. They seem to make good villains for us, ironically we are fascinated with the British royals.
@ClassicalMonarchism : He closed the port of Boston, taxed us without representation in parliament, and would rather kill us then grant us our rights as Englishmen. From an American point of view I can't find any good he did.
@chufuss - King George III gave consent to the following things: the closing of the port in Boston, as the Boston Tea Party threw expensive, imported tea into the sea - this was a crime. The Stamp Laws were proposed and pushed through parliament, the King did not propose them, nor did he approve. Parliament said that you could not have a representative, not George. He supported the British fight against American rebellion because it was a rebellion and he was a king of the 18th century...
@chufuss - (continued)... giving that much of American colonies would be insane without any fight. You were colonists, you were Puritan Christians who had moved to the Americas, you were, strictly speaking, not the same Englishmen as the ones at home were. Also, this wasn't a day of great communication like today, concerns were not expressed as elaborately as they should have been.
I am certain, in mind and heart, that George wished the very best for our American cousins, but he was no tyrant.
@chufuss - You could say, by your logic, that Obama is to blame for the injustices some American soldiers placed upon Iraqi civilians. But he's not. Just like George wasn't to blame for the way Generals in America quelled uprisings. You cannot blame it on one man. Despite George III being my favourite monarch of British history, and that I am a monarchist, I still don't feel as though he was the reason for all the changes that took place in Britain, just like he wasn't the reason things...
a really cool report
izzybeba 1 month ago
This psychopath declared an ETERNAL WAR on America after the so-called 'war of independence'. When you see a president receiving a knighthood from these royal criminals, you got to wonder who's running the shop America....
BeyondDogmaTV 4 months ago
We kicked your ass George.
--signed, a Colonial from New York.
mrceebees14 6 months ago
Sort of cool...
9217Phoenix 10 months ago
You make a strong argument for King George III and his reaction to the revolution/rebellion. I guess we are miss-informed. Sadly it seems he is the face behind our resentment during this time in our history. You were correct we Americans seem very misinformed about King George. We seem to excuse parliament and put the entire blame on the king. We have a natural distaste for monarchs I guess. They seem to make good villains for us, ironically we are fascinated with the British royals.
chufuss 11 months ago
God bless America...f**k King George III
chufuss 1 year ago
@chufuss Learn your facts, you'll find he wasn't as bad as Americans make him out to be.
ClassicalMonarchism 1 year ago
@ClassicalMonarchism : He closed the port of Boston, taxed us without representation in parliament, and would rather kill us then grant us our rights as Englishmen. From an American point of view I can't find any good he did.
chufuss 1 year ago
@chufuss - King George III gave consent to the following things: the closing of the port in Boston, as the Boston Tea Party threw expensive, imported tea into the sea - this was a crime. The Stamp Laws were proposed and pushed through parliament, the King did not propose them, nor did he approve. Parliament said that you could not have a representative, not George. He supported the British fight against American rebellion because it was a rebellion and he was a king of the 18th century...
ClassicalMonarchism 1 year ago
@chufuss - (continued)... giving that much of American colonies would be insane without any fight. You were colonists, you were Puritan Christians who had moved to the Americas, you were, strictly speaking, not the same Englishmen as the ones at home were. Also, this wasn't a day of great communication like today, concerns were not expressed as elaborately as they should have been.
I am certain, in mind and heart, that George wished the very best for our American cousins, but he was no tyrant.
ClassicalMonarchism 1 year ago
@chufuss - You could say, by your logic, that Obama is to blame for the injustices some American soldiers placed upon Iraqi civilians. But he's not. Just like George wasn't to blame for the way Generals in America quelled uprisings. You cannot blame it on one man. Despite George III being my favourite monarch of British history, and that I am a monarchist, I still don't feel as though he was the reason for all the changes that took place in Britain, just like he wasn't the reason things...
ClassicalMonarchism 1 year ago
@chufuss - (continued)... changed in his colonies. Thanks for your opinion, but your argument, like many American patriots, is invalid.
ClassicalMonarchism 1 year ago
first comment tutut
solidsnake117100 1 year ago