An MV-22 Osprey Vertical Lift-off

[CapitanFiro]

JABELIN run run !! : D

[subscriber44]

lol arma2 again

[sunNbass]

Arma2

[searcher5123]

OSPREY GUNNER INBOUND

[panky2sharma]

I luv the guys movements although no one noticing him still doing all the steps

[enzovandmp]

is the Guy dancing or something, DanceeeeePartyyy With Lady-Gaga <3333

[WojterEXx]

Damn its unstable.

[thebluemaggot]

@1gazary It's faster, more maneuverable, and can carry more troops then a black hawk. That is the point of this air craft

[italianpny43]

Pretty sure they're turboshaft. So yeah, the V-22 has turbines.

[sashman3988]

I saw this plane in the toronto airshow this year, its an amazing aircraft

[alexiller2]

=S ala Verga.....

[sunstarfire]

Mic was a tomato and failed.

[152czar]

Lol $67,000,000 for an aircraft that has killed infinitely more US soldiers than enemies.

And will never kill enemies. It has no weapons.

[Waffles250]

@152czar some now come with door gunners, or a 50.cal mounted on the bottom controlled by the co-pilot, it is also planned that these will launch hellfire missiles off of em

[JoniiBoii]

@Waffles250 actually just quietly iv heard rumours that some of the USMC variants are also fitted with x2 side mounted pods, one housing a 30mm chaingun & the other a stinger missile pod.

[exgreenberet]

A friend of mine was a test pilot for Hughes (I think it was) in Ft. Worth, TX on this thing when it was in development back in the 80's; I remember he had nothing but bad things to say about it.

He was actually killed when the one he was flying crashed.

True story.

[MidnightGrunt]

SKYNET!!!

[BlitztheDragon]

I don't know why we still have so much faith in this clunky piece of crap. The takeoff was successful, but looked clumsy as hell. It's time to move on, Mr. Secretary.

[oldfrend]

@BlitztheDragon um... because it has triple the range and +50% faster than the choppers it's replacing? but hell, legit reasons won't ever get in the way of your self-righteousness can they? it's time to open your mind, idiot.

[BlitztheDragon]

@oldfrend Oh it's pretty open as it is. If they can work the bugs out, more power to them. I just find it a bit impractical to spend twenty years and millions of dollars on the same design. Sorry if you took personal offense to my month old comment, but I just tell things as I see them. If what you say is true, then good. Doesn't change the fact it likes to crash.

[oldfrend]

@BlitztheDragon actually it does. since it's entered service it's had the best safety record of any Marine rotorcraft. something easy enough to look up, but again, facts don't seem to stand in the way of whatever opinion you feel like spouting off.

[TheHelder51]

fantastico! Can anyone tell me if an American person can not

enlisting in the U.S. Air Force?

[holocaustexpert]

Of course, we have the $20 billion per year we place before the sacred water walkers in Tel Aviv each year. This excludes the chemical and biological weapons we give them , so they can terrorize the unarmed innocent native Palestinians next door. This is America? Nope, this is America taken over and controlled by devil worshipping joos.

[alexgibb11]

the harriers loads better :)

[davetileguy]

@alexgibb11 apple vs orange dummy,harriers 40 yrs outdated carries one,vertical take off only when unloaded, why am I telling you this?never mind educate yourself

[peepsbates]

these things are so fucking awsome :D

[holocaustexpert]

$6 billion each. pure waste of taxpayer money.

[jonesy97]

@holocaustexpert You've got your figures wrong. No aircraft has ever cost 6 Billion dollars individually, to build. Not the F-22, the F-35, or even the most expensive jet ever built, the B-2.

[holocaustexpert]

@jonesy97 - The entire program will run about $25 billion. With 200 planes that is $125,000,000 per plane. I was off in my first estimate. There is no need for this POS. Greatest waste of tax payers money I can think of.

[jonesy97]

@holocaustexpert If the military and the manufacturer don't get the spiraling costs of the F-35 program under control, it has the possibility of surpassing the V-22 asthe greatest flying money pit of all time.

[c172kid]

@holocaustexpert 6 Billion, why don't you do research before making your self look like an idiot. Those things aren't even close to 1 billion. Hell, the F-22 is about 60 million a piece.

[holocaustexpert]

@c172kid - I favor a 99% cut in military spending. We are we in Afghanistan? To let the zionists regrow the poppy crop which fuels 90% of the $400 billion per yr cocaine trade. Bush put USA into 2 illegals wars. Americans get to pay the bill:

$5 trillion of borrowed money!

[AUSTIN200916]

@holocaustexpert

A 99 PERCENT CUT ?! IT WOULD BE OPEN SEASON ON THE UNITED STATES WITHOUT OUR MILITARY . THE UNITED STATES MILITARY IS OUR COUNTRIES GREATEST VIRTUE , AND THOSE WHO SERVE ARE HEROES AND NOTHING LESS.

YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY ONE HUNDRED PERCENT UNINFORMED AND NO WAY A HOLOCAUST EXPERT OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT YOU ARE PROBABLY DIRECTLY RELATED TO ADOLF HITLER

[holocaustexpert]

@AUSTIN200916 - Not related to him. As to a 99% military cut, lets just say 95% would be OK. Let Korea, and the rest defend themselves. Why are we giving zionist terrorists $20 billion per yr. Military invents phony enemies than lets Mossad bomb our buildings so as to begin a new set of wars. America's military is its greatest embarassment. They do little more than attack defenseless civilians and you call that a virtue. Vietnam= false flag, WW2= war crimes galore. Iraq= illegal war. etc....

[KitchenSpeclol]

@holocaustexpert 6 billion? lol its 60 million.

[MetalApocalypse999]

I think the aircraft in terminator were inspired by the usa v22

[dragonquest20]

i say tiger a400m eurofighter f22 apachie!!!jets airbus i die i not this life!!!!!!!!!!!!!all theme!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[youngbull1]

Nice vid, shame sound spoils it.

[MARCELOCORVACHOTORRE]

Gostei da coreografia do homenzinho de amarelo. KKKKKKK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[dodgedart74]

this is what out navy is going to be doing since we dont have to fuel a war.. just jerk around on deck

[jarlhelvete]

would really like to see horizantal takeoff!

[CountryBredJedi]

good bye

[shadowblade1989]

look like some avatar shit

[r2d23678]

@shadowblade1989 dumbass this was made way before avatar faggot

[SmellsLikePork09]

one of the goverments most wast of money and time many have already crashed

[sbd45acp]

@SmellsLikePork09 4 crashed in testing,1 tragic crash killing the crew & 15 Marines on a test flight. Considering all new tech involved in the V-22 Carbon fiber Fuselage, fly by wire, automated controls,new engines, new type rotor/props, new pilot training category, folding props, folding wing etc.The type has had a remarkable development period.Time is money- it is 1/3 faster than any helicopter w/ similar payload, It self deploys around the world saving millions in transport costs

[Gahman900]

those planes or helis watever look really unstable

[DONTdoSMACK]

@Gahman900 They're fine.

[TrainsforGTA]

awesome, but i would never fly it

[RastafariPoet]

God.. thats pretty beautiful.

[boldertits]

Looks like strong wind would topple it.

How far is this off completion?

[DONTdoSMACK]

@boldertits It's in use now.

[SuperAncientmariner]

Not even new. They had one in the 60's and it goes back to the VX-3 of the 50's...and 320 knots is slow for an aircraft these days'

[sbd45acp]

@SuperAncientmariner Uhhmm- 320 knots is REALLY fast for a helicopter

[SuperAncientmariner]

@sbd45acp For a helicopter yes I agree, fastest official recorded being the Lynx at 249. (The Unrecorded,unofficial 258 for a Bell, I think, doesn'y stand),...but the Osprey is not a helicopter, it is a Tilt rotor S/VTOL aircraft and as such is slow at 320...IMHO

[sbd45acp]

@sbd45acp I understand fully that it is not a helicopter. Let us pose the question thus; Can you name all the other operational aircraft that have the range, speed, maneuverability and payload of the V-22, fly significantly faster than 320 knots...... and land and takeoff vertically?

[SuperAncientmariner]

@sbd45acp Calm down, as this is the only example of a tilt rotor transport, the question is irrelevent, you said 320 knots is fast for a helicopter.

[sbd45acp]

@SuperAncientmariner I assure you, I am quite calm.My intent was to offer a valid comparison to aircraft that perform similar tactical vertical lift missions.While it is true to say that 320 knots is slow by comparison to most Military FIXED WING transports, 320 knots is far above the speed at which any large transport helicopter can achieve. Perhaps I should have said- 320 knots is REALLY fast for ANY similar use capability conventional rotary wing transport.

[SuperAncientmariner]

@sbd45acp Obviously a communication mix up.

[nsvr6]

Flying death trap... complete waste of money also.

[jimisajewboy]

@nsvr6 how so?

[transonicbuoy1]

Rolls got the engine right.

[wilknight12345]

Nice to see MJ doin his thing. RIP

[wilknight12345]

what's the point of this machine? looks slow and clumsy.

[chicagovigilante]

@wilknight12345

It can take off and land vertically, eliminating the need for a runway. Once it's in the air, it can direct thrust aft and fly like a prop airplane, achieving much higher speeds than any old transport helicopter.

[blackhatch46]

@wilknight12345 ha, its def not slow. unless you call 320knots slow, and i dont.

[wilknight12345]

i wouldn't what to call 320knots. Is a knot far?  is it km? or miles? i really don't know, but would like to!

[abhiginimav]

@wilknight12345 320 nautical miles per hour = 320 kts:)...nautical mile being slightly longer than a standard mile

[nekonaru16]

@wilknight12345 thats what i thought also, this is the machine that replaced the Pave Low too. I'm kinda pissed about that as the MH-53 is my favorite chopper :/

[Bravyoura]

Go Enclave go:)

[DomelBf2PL]

@Bravyoura oh god i lol'd

[assassinwarz]

now only if they could put jet engines there instead of the props

[ithicaplasma]

Its called a turbo prop. jet engines are turning those props

[nitrodavid]

@assassinwarz if you learn about disc loading you will find that jet turbine would be so much less efficient then these (still inefficient) blades

[trainxing100]

@assassinwarz that would be pretty cool but i like the look and feel the props give the osprey ya know?

[xxkil]

@assassinwarz yer now that would be thunderbirds :)

[zyoungson215]

@assassinwarz they are jets. do some research.

[piloty5]

@assassinwarz they are turbines.

[peace4888]

transformers one

[Midnight24435]

@ greenpeacekiller52: the sound skips because the camera can't handle the wind or noise generated by the rotors.

[honorelovex]

LOL look like the dude was dancing

[shuffle953]

its Micheal Jackson doing his thing

[unknownmarine43]

lol, donig the robot

[JIMMYAUMAC]

vvfvvvvvv