Every instance of C has an anti-C (Sinusoidal waves of harmonic motion) Light is more like a chain reaction of these virtual pairs as billions of waves tend to cancel. Leaving space with an average space energy/density :(square of the wave-medium.)
The sum of opposite vectors is always zero, this is the reason for the symmetry or conservation laws in physics or why, at the speed of C, time and space are zero due to length contraction and time dilation.
I'm not a scientist, let me please begin by saying that :)
Are you familiar with hadronic mechanics by any chance, and if yes, are both compatible? Should you not have heard about hadronic mechanics, "Ananda M Bosman" is a good example to start looking for more info, here on the tube.
So energy exists as a wave that fluctuates casing the illusion of movement when in reality there are fixed points of energy packets that retain their volume therefore just absorbing and releasing the energy to the next fixed point. Very intriguing but still just theoretical and only linguistically justified.
@SH10JogaBonito Read about the observational support for the Common Medium Carrier Hypothesis on the theory page on the com site. If you think you understand it try watching the hypertime and grand illusion videos. The relationship between the sungrazing comets and the active solar regions-cme's is new observational support. Non-trivial.
Outstanding! I’m glad to have come across yet another person who knows our traditional descriptions about the science of us and existence can be very misleading. Been working on these ideas for almost 2 decades so I imagine we shared many of the same thought processes.
Excellent definition of the term “nothing”! “Nothing” and “nothingness” are one of the worst misleading ideas a person can believe in. More times than not it just ruins a person’s perspective and comprehension.
Existence does not operate in terms of nothing, nor has it ever operated in terms of nothing, and furthermore it is impossible for there to be any kind of anything that would equal “nothing”. The problem is that we think we actually think of the idea. We believe we can contemplate or consider some kind of condition that equals “nothing”, but this is not true either. To be fair I do understand that it is a very difficult idea to eliminate.
Once again, great points about “light”. The actual current situation is that we’re still not sure exactly what is going on, but I believe we are close. People like Russell and Tesla we able to reveal a lot based on their greater or simply more accurate understanding, and they’re not the only ones.
Yes it is true that some kind of continuity/preservation happens, or as Russell explains: a reproduction or wave recurrence, and this totally does give the effect of “travel”.
To mention that the Earth’s atmosphere/moisture plays an important role in “conditioning” electromagnetic waves so that we get varying levels of heat is extremely on-point!
It goes to show that there’s much to just place in the right order, to just convert to the most effective terms, etc. I believe most if not all of what we need to know is right around us and we are not hopelessly limited and cut-off from the complete nature of existence.
It would be good if you could make update on your thoughts after researching and reading Russell's works. I'm having a hard time following >< , that's just means I don't have complete picture of how space-time and light coexist ... in short I didn't glad mind-blowing realization due to my lack of comprehension on this subject 3:41 :) peace
I got Walter Russell's The Universal One after I read what Tesla said about the work of Walter Russell; he said Walter should lock up all the knowledge for 1000 years or so until mankind is ready for it. I was like WOW I need to get this book and so I did... Its all so simple that my mind is struggling with it. Its all about contest of two equal forces yet of opposite direction and its all about relations = as you said here about volume. I feel like I am close in understanding it...
@astrotometry I think context should be applied to such statements, because I am an avid Russell Researcher yet everyone Ive come across seems to merely regurgitate his words in a sort of biblical response
Light does indeed "travel" in the sense that we use GPS and Microwave beaming to "Bounce" off mirrors and satellites...the measurement of "Time" it had taken to reach the moon back into our sensors gives us the Distance of the moon accurately, Lag times and Pings work the same way
@astrotometry I think in his minds eye, he was trying to bring clarification to Newton and others Corpuscular theory of light, things like photon "Packets" acting like individual entities I believe he was trying to tell us that everything works similar to an organ pipe or tuning fork, (Phonons and acoustic particles)
Scientists in Princeton, NJ in 2000 sent laser pulses thru Cesium vapor at 310 times lightspeed,
"There is a thinking stuff from which all things are made which, in its original state, permeates, penetrates, and fills the interspaces of the universe. " Wallace D. Wattles.
"There is a thinking stuff from which all things are made in, in its original state, permeates, penetrates, and fills the interspaces of the universe. " Wallace D. Wattles.
These are lateral observations, other less obvious explanations for things we have observed with science. You hear hoof beats, most people assume horse, Astrotometry (which isn't even a word) would assume zebra. Which, hoof beats can mean zebra. But you have no facts behind your theories. Just theories that have no literal significance.
Where does science say there is "nothing" in space? Emptiness is not nothing, it's devoid of anything we can see. This normally means that there is energy when matter doesn't exist.
Is hypertime really the best meme for broader understanding or does it incur confusion, you seem to be replicating russels words in different language, which is perhaps compressed but in a less resonant more jargon based and isolative fashion. It is of course tricky to compress, simplify and still retain information. I made an attempt but I felt it, I simply left the hypertime portion out and added something else in rather then made it more resonant.
@MrCryospark There is a time in which material things manifest of which they cannot detect since during that time they are unmanifest. The sungrazing comet phenomena is empirical evidence for this concept. Hypertime is a descriptive and precise to the nature of the phenomenon. As such it's easily derived mathematically. Have you watched the hypertime videos?
@patternsinchaos my issue is not empiricial evidence, just the rest of the terms used are more broadly understood and relatable which is the point of explaining something.
old hat... The tao that can be TOLD is not the eternal Tao The "name" that can be named is not the eternal Name. The unnamable is the eternally real. Naming is the origin of all "particular things". Free from desire, you realize the mystery. Caught in desire, you see only the manifestations. Yet mystery and manifestations arise from the same source. This source is called darkness. [light come from it] Darkness within darkness. The gateway to all understanding.
Would it not be reasonable to consider that something can move so fast that it is always in all places simply because the speed is such that it can be always, all places. It would appear to be still because it is everywhere present always, so movement has turned into stillness.
Russell said that inside a seemingly solid still object, such as a pencil on your desk, there is tremendous violent motion going on.
The normal rules of relative motion differential applies to every other type of wave, but not to light. That is because it it a standing waveform created from the movement in it's carrier forms. That's why it's "speed" is always measured as a constant.
The propagation or the actual "traveling" happens on the level of manifestation of the observer or observational mechanism.
Came across this today in which Russel is given credit :
"Einstein's equation "E=MC squared" is wrong, or at best partially correct. His def of "E" is wrong, his def of mass is wrong.
C is defined as the top speed possible for anything, then it is squared, which would be even faster & thus contradicts the definition. Light is described as a constant, which is wrong as defined. In a higher understanding, light does not move, our perception of the speed of light is wrong. Those who really
understand and who can prove it by creating matter out of "nothing" for instance, say that the original WHITE LIGHT is invisible and still.
The correct science being discovered & revealed by such as Nikola Tesla,
Walter Russell, Tom Bearden, Andrija Puharich, etc., was suppressed to prevent humanity from achieving energy independence... This same technology leads to understanding of good health, and thus independence from the drug..."
Walter Russell is one of the greatest Cosmologists of all time. His profound understanding is so far beyond the academic explanations, that there is no point at all in listening to academic theories any longer. They are flawed to the core!
He proved academia to be false in almost every respect. His Cosmology is based on 3 dimensional Sacred Geometry. When we look at the Universe we see exactly what Russell has described and not a bunch of academic egghead mythematical equations!
I couldn't agree more, 77G. I'm not _that_ familiar with Russel's work. But I believe my work is extending Russel's fundamental ideas and I have now made new observations that for all intents and purposes prove these ideas. Thanks for the comment.
"nothing in space?" my thoughts exactly! Hard for scientists to talk about something they cant test hehe, but like you said its "logical" for something to take up that "Nothingness" I hope more people start catching on because that concept isnt to hard to get, just have to think about it for a sec.
@astrotometry You actually agree with Walter about life not traveling? Seriously dude, you sound legit so please, don't fall for the retardation he proposes. You might as well end up believing someone poofed the world in place. Since if I remember right Walter proposes that a creator is recycling this world over and over or something. I agree about the no nothingness though and I think a theory exists already about it... I remember talking about it with a friend. =/
@Razgrits I realize how unbelievable Russell's claim is. But if you consider the photon as a standing wave, standing waves do not technically travel, their apparent movement is a function of the frequency relationships of the underlying waveforms. If you read down on through the theory on the Astrotometry site, physical motion is reformulated as hypertime translation in Astrotometry.
@patternsinchaos I like your name because I have used it when confronting christians about how 'orderly' our world seems, it's just a conceivable to us, pattern in chaos.
To the subject at hand, there is something wrong with what you said, light can be considered both as a wave and as a particle. Else there would be no reflection/refraction, it wouldn't bounce off on materials and so, the 'standing wave' theory is more or less rubbish in my opinion, and I don't see a good reason to look it up.
...was not easy at first for me to see how I could apply it in my life in a practical manner. But it worked out & now my grasp of it (for my purposes anyway) is good. Often it was a matter of - from my end - the 'languaging' style of the information. Some of it translated from other languages, some very old or both! Learning to take these factors into consideration more.
A thoughtful video. Russell had a lot of interesting things to say. His work has been more on the periphery of my awareness - but I'm paying a little more attention. I particularly like what he had to say about the role the concept/states of of polarity have to do with the activity of (the) creation. Polarity being one of the principles of the universe that has had a lot of my attention: Researched pretty intensely c/o it....
Exactly - which is how it's possible that everything is true & nothing is true all at the same time. The shortest distance is the same as the longest distance, too! Both are true & neither are true, lol! I understand now why when I was still a little girl I used to think that something about reality smelled fishy. And that science and other things existed just to keep us busy, busy, busy all in fun. But who wrote the original joke, to say it one way? The metaphorical question I now explore. (o;
Almost, 0=Infinity and reality, because 0 has the potential to become any number. And string theory supposes that things that have a potential is bound to happen sometimes, as is for reality.
Every instance of C has an anti-C (Sinusoidal waves of harmonic motion) Light is more like a chain reaction of these virtual pairs as billions of waves tend to cancel. Leaving space with an average space energy/density :(square of the wave-medium.)
The sum of opposite vectors is always zero, this is the reason for the symmetry or conservation laws in physics or why, at the speed of C, time and space are zero due to length contraction and time dilation.
MrKorrazonCold 1 week ago
I'm not a scientist, let me please begin by saying that :)
Are you familiar with hadronic mechanics by any chance, and if yes, are both compatible? Should you not have heard about hadronic mechanics, "Ananda M Bosman" is a good example to start looking for more info, here on the tube.
Thanks!
peejeeken 1 month ago
So energy exists as a wave that fluctuates casing the illusion of movement when in reality there are fixed points of energy packets that retain their volume therefore just absorbing and releasing the energy to the next fixed point. Very intriguing but still just theoretical and only linguistically justified.
SH10JogaBonito 3 months ago
@SH10JogaBonito Read about the observational support for the Common Medium Carrier Hypothesis on the theory page on the com site. If you think you understand it try watching the hypertime and grand illusion videos. The relationship between the sungrazing comets and the active solar regions-cme's is new observational support. Non-trivial.
astrotometry 3 months ago
So do u have skype? We really need to talk on there. Trust me, you will not be let down. User name is joshua.z3
Jaxurcar1 3 months ago
so wait a moment here... it is WE that is bouncing in and out of existence?!?!?!?!
godkingmac 3 months ago
@godkingmac yes, that's how an x-ray gets through supposedly solid matter.
astrotometry 3 months ago
@astrotometry can we use that fact to our advantage somehow?
godkingmac 3 months ago
@godkingmac "can we use that fact to our advantage somehow?" To which fact are you referring?
astrotometry 3 months ago
@astrotometry someone doesn't know anything about physics lol
CDClock 1 month ago
There is no god but God . . .
zatoichiable 3 months ago
light is an illusion
it is everywhere always
SocialistDemocracy 3 months ago
the Tao/ yin-yang duality has it all
DoctorMaxMoebius 4 months ago
Outstanding! I’m glad to have come across yet another person who knows our traditional descriptions about the science of us and existence can be very misleading. Been working on these ideas for almost 2 decades so I imagine we shared many of the same thought processes.
Excellent definition of the term “nothing”! “Nothing” and “nothingness” are one of the worst misleading ideas a person can believe in. More times than not it just ruins a person’s perspective and comprehension.
crawlFace 5 months ago
@crawlFace
Existence does not operate in terms of nothing, nor has it ever operated in terms of nothing, and furthermore it is impossible for there to be any kind of anything that would equal “nothing”. The problem is that we think we actually think of the idea. We believe we can contemplate or consider some kind of condition that equals “nothing”, but this is not true either. To be fair I do understand that it is a very difficult idea to eliminate.
crawlFace 5 months ago
@crawlFace
Once again, great points about “light”. The actual current situation is that we’re still not sure exactly what is going on, but I believe we are close. People like Russell and Tesla we able to reveal a lot based on their greater or simply more accurate understanding, and they’re not the only ones.
Yes it is true that some kind of continuity/preservation happens, or as Russell explains: a reproduction or wave recurrence, and this totally does give the effect of “travel”.
crawlFace 5 months ago
@crawlFace
To mention that the Earth’s atmosphere/moisture plays an important role in “conditioning” electromagnetic waves so that we get varying levels of heat is extremely on-point!
It goes to show that there’s much to just place in the right order, to just convert to the most effective terms, etc. I believe most if not all of what we need to know is right around us and we are not hopelessly limited and cut-off from the complete nature of existence.
crawlFace 5 months ago
It would be good if you could make update on your thoughts after researching and reading Russell's works. I'm having a hard time following >< , that's just means I don't have complete picture of how space-time and light coexist ... in short I didn't glad mind-blowing realization due to my lack of comprehension on this subject 3:41 :) peace
dankcro 5 months ago
Comment removed
dankcro 5 months ago
Are you familiar with Keelys work? Dale Pond has recreated his Dynospheres great stuff on Sympathetic VIbratory Physics.
BrainChild666 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we are the light.
WAHsu 7 months ago
I got Walter Russell's The Universal One after I read what Tesla said about the work of Walter Russell; he said Walter should lock up all the knowledge for 1000 years or so until mankind is ready for it. I was like WOW I need to get this book and so I did... Its all so simple that my mind is struggling with it. Its all about contest of two equal forces yet of opposite direction and its all about relations = as you said here about volume. I feel like I am close in understanding it...
croHDgaming 9 months ago
Isn't light a minuscule slice of the em spectrum that our consciousness can perceive?
earlycoleman 9 months ago
@earlycoleman Indeed it is. This more properly reefers to EM waves.
astrotometry 9 months ago
@astrotometry I think context should be applied to such statements, because I am an avid Russell Researcher yet everyone Ive come across seems to merely regurgitate his words in a sort of biblical response
Light does indeed "travel" in the sense that we use GPS and Microwave beaming to "Bounce" off mirrors and satellites...the measurement of "Time" it had taken to reach the moon back into our sensors gives us the Distance of the moon accurately, Lag times and Pings work the same way
Context
sn1pe352 6 months ago
@astrotometry I think in his minds eye, he was trying to bring clarification to Newton and others Corpuscular theory of light, things like photon "Packets" acting like individual entities I believe he was trying to tell us that everything works similar to an organ pipe or tuning fork, (Phonons and acoustic particles)
Scientists in Princeton, NJ in 2000 sent laser pulses thru Cesium vapor at 310 times lightspeed,
Thus Relativity is not a Law but merely a theory
Nicholas Ellis @ sn1pe352
sn1pe352 6 months ago
"There is a thinking stuff from which all things are made which, in its original state, permeates, penetrates, and fills the interspaces of the universe. " Wallace D. Wattles.
PokerHeroblog 10 months ago
"There is a thinking stuff from which all things are made in, in its original state, permeates, penetrates, and fills the interspaces of the universe. " Wallace D. Wattles.
PokerHeroblog 10 months ago
These are lateral observations, other less obvious explanations for things we have observed with science. You hear hoof beats, most people assume horse, Astrotometry (which isn't even a word) would assume zebra. Which, hoof beats can mean zebra. But you have no facts behind your theories. Just theories that have no literal significance.
Nervousification 10 months ago 2
illuminatiMatrix - What In The World Is Going On? pt4of4 THE ILLUSION OF THE LIGHT
bvgatti 11 months ago
Virtual particles, 'nuff said. Real vacuums do not exist.
Gigano1986 1 year ago
@Gigano1986
Man, whatever you imagine and give it name, exists, so, don't bother. Read Hegel. If something exist, it is being. If unbeing exist, it is being too.
sinisavlais 7 months ago
Where does science say there is "nothing" in space? Emptiness is not nothing, it's devoid of anything we can see. This normally means that there is energy when matter doesn't exist.
UnderManiac 1 year ago
@UnderManiac Particle physics maintains that there is a vacuum which exists in the space surrounding all atomic particles.
astrotometry 1 year ago
@astrotometry But a vacuum is not nothing. Perfect vacuums are a philosophical concept. Real vacuums aren't completely empty.
UnderManiac 1 year ago
Look up "the twilight club" in wikipedia
educationalexcellenc 1 year ago
Awesome. Finally found someone who thinks a deep as I do. Can I take Russell to court :)
Anothercoilgun 1 year ago
im ordering A new concept of the universe, looks like it resonates with Astrotometry
WAHsu 1 year ago
Is hypertime really the best meme for broader understanding or does it incur confusion, you seem to be replicating russels words in different language, which is perhaps compressed but in a less resonant more jargon based and isolative fashion. It is of course tricky to compress, simplify and still retain information. I made an attempt but I felt it, I simply left the hypertime portion out and added something else in rather then made it more resonant.
Your terminology of hypertime would be good
MrCryospark 1 year ago
@MrCryospark There is a time in which material things manifest of which they cannot detect since during that time they are unmanifest. The sungrazing comet phenomena is empirical evidence for this concept. Hypertime is a descriptive and precise to the nature of the phenomenon. As such it's easily derived mathematically. Have you watched the hypertime videos?
patternsinchaos 1 year ago
@patternsinchaos my issue is not empiricial evidence, just the rest of the terms used are more broadly understood and relatable which is the point of explaining something.
MrCryospark 1 year ago
Comment removed
carr60ick 1 year ago
Comment removed
carr60ick 1 year ago
Comment removed
carr60ick 1 year ago
Comment removed
carr60ick 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Have a look at the blog
theuniversalone.blogspot.com
carr60ick 1 year ago
etyrnal 1 year ago 2
@etyrnal I'm totally with you :)
deeptrancenow 1 year ago
einstein gravity com
whenisneveragain 1 year ago
Would it not be reasonable to consider that something can move so fast that it is always in all places simply because the speed is such that it can be always, all places. It would appear to be still because it is everywhere present always, so movement has turned into stillness.
Russell said that inside a seemingly solid still object, such as a pencil on your desk, there is tremendous violent motion going on.
TheDoveLady 2 years ago
"Waves of light do not travel". Every other type of wave in the spectrum travels so why wouldn't light waves?
joroma77 2 years ago
Good question.
The normal rules of relative motion differential applies to every other type of wave, but not to light. That is because it it a standing waveform created from the movement in it's carrier forms. That's why it's "speed" is always measured as a constant.
The propagation or the actual "traveling" happens on the level of manifestation of the observer or observational mechanism.
cosabio 2 years ago
Came across this today in which Russel is given credit :
"Einstein's equation "E=MC squared" is wrong, or at best partially correct. His def of "E" is wrong, his def of mass is wrong.
C is defined as the top speed possible for anything, then it is squared, which would be even faster & thus contradicts the definition. Light is described as a constant, which is wrong as defined. In a higher understanding, light does not move, our perception of the speed of light is wrong. Those who really
Yoetah 2 years ago
understand and who can prove it by creating matter out of "nothing" for instance, say that the original WHITE LIGHT is invisible and still.
The correct science being discovered & revealed by such as Nikola Tesla,
Walter Russell, Tom Bearden, Andrija Puharich, etc., was suppressed to prevent humanity from achieving energy independence... This same technology leads to understanding of good health, and thus independence from the drug..."
(Fire From The Sky Document)
Yoetah 2 years ago
Walter Russell is one of the greatest Cosmologists of all time. His profound understanding is so far beyond the academic explanations, that there is no point at all in listening to academic theories any longer. They are flawed to the core!
He proved academia to be false in almost every respect. His Cosmology is based on 3 dimensional Sacred Geometry. When we look at the Universe we see exactly what Russell has described and not a bunch of academic egghead mythematical equations!
77GSlinger 2 years ago
I couldn't agree more, 77G. I'm not _that_ familiar with Russel's work. But I believe my work is extending Russel's fundamental ideas and I have now made new observations that for all intents and purposes prove these ideas. Thanks for the comment.
cosabio 2 years ago
awesome. your videos are making my brain buff.
myruin25 2 years ago
"nothing in space?" my thoughts exactly! Hard for scientists to talk about something they cant test hehe, but like you said its "logical" for something to take up that "Nothingness" I hope more people start catching on because that concept isnt to hard to get, just have to think about it for a sec.
nothing=nothing! not even space
Peace
tkmjulricksen 2 years ago
Yep it's illogical to say that nothing takes up space. That's what the Greeks concluded. Thanks.
astrotometry 2 years ago
Comment removed
Razgrits 1 year ago
@astrotometry You actually agree with Walter about life not traveling? Seriously dude, you sound legit so please, don't fall for the retardation he proposes. You might as well end up believing someone poofed the world in place. Since if I remember right Walter proposes that a creator is recycling this world over and over or something. I agree about the no nothingness though and I think a theory exists already about it... I remember talking about it with a friend. =/
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits I realize how unbelievable Russell's claim is. But if you consider the photon as a standing wave, standing waves do not technically travel, their apparent movement is a function of the frequency relationships of the underlying waveforms. If you read down on through the theory on the Astrotometry site, physical motion is reformulated as hypertime translation in Astrotometry.
patternsinchaos 1 year ago
@patternsinchaos I like your name because I have used it when confronting christians about how 'orderly' our world seems, it's just a conceivable to us, pattern in chaos.
To the subject at hand, there is something wrong with what you said, light can be considered both as a wave and as a particle. Else there would be no reflection/refraction, it wouldn't bounce off on materials and so, the 'standing wave' theory is more or less rubbish in my opinion, and I don't see a good reason to look it up.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@tkmjulricksen they are retards,little spoiled children,wanting to be adults.
find a real alchemist(good luck uniniatiated one)
bobo007xx 9 months ago
I AM in a wave of appreciation.
Hicluster 2 years ago
...was not easy at first for me to see how I could apply it in my life in a practical manner. But it worked out & now my grasp of it (for my purposes anyway) is good. Often it was a matter of - from my end - the 'languaging' style of the information. Some of it translated from other languages, some very old or both! Learning to take these factors into consideration more.
11moonelf 2 years ago
A thoughtful video. Russell had a lot of interesting things to say. His work has been more on the periphery of my awareness - but I'm paying a little more attention. I particularly like what he had to say about the role the concept/states of of polarity have to do with the activity of (the) creation. Polarity being one of the principles of the universe that has had a lot of my attention: Researched pretty intensely c/o it....
11moonelf 2 years ago
Exactly - which is how it's possible that everything is true & nothing is true all at the same time. The shortest distance is the same as the longest distance, too! Both are true & neither are true, lol! I understand now why when I was still a little girl I used to think that something about reality smelled fishy. And that science and other things existed just to keep us busy, busy, busy all in fun. But who wrote the original joke, to say it one way? The metaphorical question I now explore. (o;
11moonelf 2 years ago
hey John....all is 'light' at different/divided /multiplied.pressure....projection is key....and kasei....is what???....
kaseiv 2 years ago
Sorry for the delay in responding. I'm not sure what you mean by this though.
astrotometry 2 years ago
Almost, 0=Infinity and reality, because 0 has the potential to become any number. And string theory supposes that things that have a potential is bound to happen sometimes, as is for reality.
eVentyrBoost 2 years ago