haha ya its funny the toyota had crossmembers cut out of it...funny what people will believe i think its more of a test for the suspension....the frame can handle it i mean i would drive a shitbox kia over that and i bet nothing would happen to the frame. just another lame commercial from automakers
well there is not kias with frames like this....just unibody frams....so right the would be alot less flex........because everything is one piece. and the toyota really does have weak frame.
Well in these video's the Tundra tracks the best down the course. It maintains a straighter path down the course than any of the competition. I would say that the chassis is supposed to allow the driver to maintain directional stability the easiest. The Tundra clearly does this the best (when watching the other videos). Then again, everyone wants different things from their trucks. Apparently F150 owners care more about bed movement than keeping the vehicle going in a straight line.
god...they dont need special tracks, just come to detroit and drive on our roads!!!!LOL
mifan93 2 years ago
LMAO nice lol.
PowerLiftingMenace 2 years ago
haha ya its funny the toyota had crossmembers cut out of it...funny what people will believe i think its more of a test for the suspension....the frame can handle it i mean i would drive a shitbox kia over that and i bet nothing would happen to the frame. just another lame commercial from automakers
blazerk5drew 3 years ago
yeah thats it they dont cut nothing out.
Fordman06777 3 years ago
well there is not kias with frames like this....just unibody frams....so right the would be alot less flex........because everything is one piece. and the toyota really does have weak frame.
guitarman2116 3 years ago 2
lol, toyota is not better than my 1999 F-150.
Fordman06777 3 years ago
haha lol ur funny 99....
blazerk5drew 3 years ago
the tundra is worse then my 2003 F-150 supercrew 5.4
hotrodkid7 3 years ago
Yeah the Toyota's chassis looked like wet spaghetti when they took it on Silver Creek.
masterd151 3 years ago 4
That's a pretty accurate description master. And the F150 would be dry spaghetti. Which one is more likely to break?
wikiwikiwildwest 2 years ago
Thats irrelevant because the F150 frame hasnt had any issues with cracking.
masterd151 2 years ago
I never said it had, I said it is more likely. Lack of flexibility means more likelihood of breaking.
wikiwikiwildwest 2 years ago
The real point here is to decide which chassis does a better job of doing what its supposed to do, and thats the Ford....
masterd151 2 years ago
Well in these video's the Tundra tracks the best down the course. It maintains a straighter path down the course than any of the competition. I would say that the chassis is supposed to allow the driver to maintain directional stability the easiest. The Tundra clearly does this the best (when watching the other videos). Then again, everyone wants different things from their trucks. Apparently F150 owners care more about bed movement than keeping the vehicle going in a straight line.
wikiwikiwildwest 2 years ago
@wikiwikiwildwest I would not want my box flexing and warping when im carrying a load. Ive seen Tundras shudder over a railroad crossing.
yellowcow13 5 months ago
lol better than a toyota would be..haha nice very true
ndubb1 3 years ago 2