There is an acoustic Polydor of Schumann's fourth symphony (inexplicably omitting the scherzo); I hope to post it here some time. The sound is very thick and murky even by the standards of 1924/5, but it does add to the picture of Pfitzner as a conductor whose interpretations somehow manage to sound (to my ears at least) perfectly honest and not at all showy, despite the constant tempo-changes.
Fantastic, amazing..! Great quality of recording too.. I mean the filming and sound recording from your superb Gramophone into digital sound! Better than some professional records companies do! (NAXOS, to just mention one)
Thanks a lot for bothering posting this long, fantastic work! We are used to more nervous, tight interpretations nowadays, but I like it this way, the music breathes more. The only aspect I'm surprised about with the Berliner are the intonation imperfections here and there.
I've heard/read of other recordings of the BPO from this period with intonation problems, but in this case the recording quality may be partly at fault.
Nothing by Szell/Cleveland holds up to conductor/orchestra combos like Pfitzner/BPO, Stoki/Philly, Mengelberg/Concertgebouw, Stock/Chicago, etc. Pfitzner is the least of these but usually interesting if not great. Szell is invariably straight and dull.
I have this same recording, only it's on gold label Brunswick. It originally belonged to my great Grandfather. It's still my alltime favorite.
Symphonicprelude 2 years ago
Thanks! Do you by any chance have one of the Aucoustic pfitzner reocrds?
------------------------
Greetings,
Rolf
Historical classical recordings
European Archive, Paris
EuropeanArchive 3 years ago
I'm afraid not. Only 1928/1929 recordings. I wasn't aware that he made any acoustic records.
merrihew 3 years ago
There is an acoustic Polydor of Schumann's fourth symphony (inexplicably omitting the scherzo); I hope to post it here some time. The sound is very thick and murky even by the standards of 1924/5, but it does add to the picture of Pfitzner as a conductor whose interpretations somehow manage to sound (to my ears at least) perfectly honest and not at all showy, despite the constant tempo-changes.
Menophanes 1 year ago
Fantastic, amazing..! Great quality of recording too.. I mean the filming and sound recording from your superb Gramophone into digital sound! Better than some professional records companies do! (NAXOS, to just mention one)
follygan 4 years ago
This is not a very good example of the sound quality. Check out my posting of Rosa Ponselle singing the Ernani aria.
merrihew 4 years ago
Thanks a lot for bothering posting this long, fantastic work! We are used to more nervous, tight interpretations nowadays, but I like it this way, the music breathes more. The only aspect I'm surprised about with the Berliner are the intonation imperfections here and there.
kspm01 4 years ago
I've heard/read of other recordings of the BPO from this period with intonation problems, but in this case the recording quality may be partly at fault.
merrihew 4 years ago
Wow, this is amazing. Thank you!
themfromspace 4 years ago
Wonderful and somewhat more 'classic' Performance! Thanks for Posting!
transformingArt 4 years ago
First line on my previous post should read:
"Thanks from the requestor or requester..."
jkenny313 4 years ago
Thank you from the requestee.
I read that Hitler had "requested" that
Pfitzner re-write Mendelson's "Midsummer Night's Dream" because M. was Jewish.
To his credit, Pfitzner refused.
How would you compare this recording with say,
the Szell/Cleveland one ? To me, Pfitner's
sounds "bigger" and not as tight and dry,
if that means anything...
Thanks again.
jkenny313 4 years ago
Nothing by Szell/Cleveland holds up to conductor/orchestra combos like Pfitzner/BPO, Stoki/Philly, Mengelberg/Concertgebouw, Stock/Chicago, etc. Pfitzner is the least of these but usually interesting if not great. Szell is invariably straight and dull.
2ndviolinist 2 years ago