Separate state and church! What is this fat hog doing at the presidential inauguration? Oink-oink-oink-hate-fags-oink-oink-need-more-ham-oink-oink-oink. Invocation my ass.
It's probably hopeless, but I'll try. I merely raised the question as to the constitutionality of prayers at inaugurations. You implied that it had already been settled by the SC (though you still haven't corroborated this). I said it was still open to interpretation. You seemed then to agree with that...what is your game, anyway? Please no insults.
In answer to your question, do I have a choice? Do you enjoy being an a**hole that much? Explain yourself if you are so up on SC rulings...then I'll duly recoil with the proper egg on my face
That's not what I meant. The Constitution is always open to re-interpretation. Why then is there a Supreme Court? You don't see the possibility of prayers at inaugurations a thing of the past 100 years from now? It's not forever set in stone. Just like the way society is always changing and evolving. We now have a higher percentage of atheists, agnostics and freethinkers in this country than ever before.
I certainly agree with you that it can and possibly will change, but also don't think for a minute that you can change the subject from what you actually said... which is calling the religious activity here unconstitutional, which at this point, it is not.
Who is the dim one here. I never said it was, for a fact, unconstitutional. Go back and read my original words again. I merely raised a question. I didn't expect such a rude response.
...which was rebutted, to which you replied with you thought it was up to a different interpretation. And, since there's only two options there, hmm........
The real issue should be--is it constitutional to have all this praying and religiosity at inaugurations? I thought this was a secular society with separation between church and state
It STILL has to do with government and it STILL has to do with religion, both at the same time...there are some for whom that can seem inconsistent with a secular society. I think that's thinking.
Forget what? I never owned a slave, I never lynched a black man, and I never loved anyone less because of the color of their skin.
There is a love in my heart for all people, and I could care less what their ethnic background looks like. I have two best friends--one is a Middle Eastern man, a Jewish man by the name of Jesus Christ, and the other is my best friend on earth--and he is black.
As a white man, I ask you: What evil have I done that you ask me to remember? Can you forgive?
I'm a Lesbian and was unsure about Pastor Rick Warren. But, Obama did the right thing inviting him to his Inauguration. Our Country is hurting and we all need to come together and rebuild, then ...go back to fighting each other!
Separate state and church! What is this fat hog doing at the presidential inauguration? Oink-oink-oink-hate-fags-oink-oink-need-more-ham-oink-oink-oink. Invocation my ass.
erginakif 1 year ago
I did not know Rick Warren was a doctor. I thought he was a preacher man.
zekest 2 years ago
...you do realize that by "doctor", they're not talking about medical doctor, right? lol
ImmortalSynn 2 years ago
It's probably hopeless, but I'll try. I merely raised the question as to the constitutionality of prayers at inaugurations. You implied that it had already been settled by the SC (though you still haven't corroborated this). I said it was still open to interpretation. You seemed then to agree with that...what is your game, anyway? Please no insults.
soami2u 3 years ago
In answer to your question, do I have a choice? Do you enjoy being an a**hole that much? Explain yourself if you are so up on SC rulings...then I'll duly recoil with the proper egg on my face
soami2u 3 years ago
Of course you have a choice, just don't fool yourself into thinking it's accurate at this point in time.
ImmortalSynn 3 years ago
Sorry...I just feel God has no place in government. But you're entitled to your opinions just as I am to mine
soami2u 3 years ago
Are you dim, or just plain stupid?
...what I've said to you has nothing to do with my opinion, but with the official interpretation of the Constitution as per the SCOTUS.
ImmortalSynn 3 years ago
That's not what I meant. The Constitution is always open to re-interpretation. Why then is there a Supreme Court? You don't see the possibility of prayers at inaugurations a thing of the past 100 years from now? It's not forever set in stone. Just like the way society is always changing and evolving. We now have a higher percentage of atheists, agnostics and freethinkers in this country than ever before.
soami2u 3 years ago
I certainly agree with you that it can and possibly will change, but also don't think for a minute that you can change the subject from what you actually said... which is calling the religious activity here unconstitutional, which at this point, it is not.
ImmortalSynn 3 years ago
Who is the dim one here. I never said it was, for a fact, unconstitutional. Go back and read my original words again. I merely raised a question. I didn't expect such a rude response.
soami2u 3 years ago
"I merely raised a question."
...which was rebutted, to which you replied with you thought it was up to a different interpretation. And, since there's only two options there, hmm........
ImmortalSynn 3 years ago
This is why I quit Huffington Post and went back to concentrating on my first love: music. I think I hate politics.
soami2u 3 years ago
....riiiiiight
ImmortalSynn 3 years ago
The real issue should be--is it constitutional to have all this praying and religiosity at inaugurations? I thought this was a secular society with separation between church and state
soami2u 3 years ago
There's nothing in this against the constitution... the perceived separation of church&state applies to the Legislative branch, not the Executive.
ImmortalSynn 3 years ago
I think that could be subject to some interpretation
soami2u 3 years ago
Indeed, it's called the SCOTUS, and I basically just reiterated their interpretation (the only one that actually matters) on the issue to you, lol.
ImmortalSynn 3 years ago
What would we ignoramuses do without you knowitalls, lol
soami2u 3 years ago
...learn to think/research/corroborate before you speak, perhaps?
ImmortalSynn 3 years ago
It STILL has to do with government and it STILL has to do with religion, both at the same time...there are some for whom that can seem inconsistent with a secular society. I think that's thinking.
soami2u 3 years ago
Unfortunately, as you've now been twice told... the ones whose job/mandate it is to interpret the Constitution... disagree.
Which is a semi-polite way of saying who cares what you believe, it's inaccurate.
ImmortalSynn 3 years ago
Thank you, professor. I'm so enlightened. Now I'll just shut up
soami2u 3 years ago
Would be the wisest thing you've done thus far.
ImmortalSynn 3 years ago
this is good he did this.. try to unify but not let whites forget..
aim20062010 3 years ago
Forget what? I never owned a slave, I never lynched a black man, and I never loved anyone less because of the color of their skin.
There is a love in my heart for all people, and I could care less what their ethnic background looks like. I have two best friends--one is a Middle Eastern man, a Jewish man by the name of Jesus Christ, and the other is my best friend on earth--and he is black.
As a white man, I ask you: What evil have I done that you ask me to remember? Can you forgive?
Aseldaar 3 years ago
beautiful voice
ashken79 3 years ago
Sickening part of a historical event. Keep the bigots for the republican parties.
diezungen 3 years ago
There are democratic bigots, every dem does not go along with the gay agenda. Dividing along party lines is so outdated.
BobbieJeanEndZone 3 years ago
I'm a Lesbian and was unsure about Pastor Rick Warren. But, Obama did the right thing inviting him to his Inauguration. Our Country is hurting and we all need to come together and rebuild, then ...go back to fighting each other!
Lyfsavr64 3 years ago 3
Leading bigot of our day
3yahweh3 3 years ago