Added: 2 years ago
From: cricketaustraliatv
Views: 50,981
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • nice high five to no-one Ben

  • Comment removed

  • lets play the shane watson drinking game!

    everytime he says "um..." take a drink!

  • THE HAUS IS ON FIRE!

  • lol dang simon katich :(

  • "I pride myself on not getting out": 20 test 50's and only 2 hundreds beg to differ Watto.

  • @tomelmslie mate I don't think you can do any better.

  • @SourceNeon Yeah well if I could do better, a 16 yr old playing minor county cricket, then there would be a serious problem with Watson and international cricket, so not a fantastic comparison is it.

  • 0:40 haha

  • lol

  • both flintoff and johnson are hugely overrated

    neither of them are consistent enough

  • how are idiots having an argument over who is better out of flintoff and johnson. its not a debate. flintoff was overrated and johnson is a superstar

  • @brynjones11

    That must be why johnson is doing so well these days...

  • ABSOLUTELY AWESOME BET.......HILFENHAUS IS A CHARACTER.......WELDONE MATE....HI-FIVE FROM ME IN THE AIR...YO

  • "richdownes89" typical pom if it aint out of the mcc text book it's wrong.....looser.

  • @DKLillee355 never said it was wrong, it's just a different style of play. I was just stating consistency is important, especially in test matches.

  • If ronnie slow coach mcdonald got the wicket, Watson should have bought the whole team dinner.

  • lol 0:40-0:45 Does Hilfenhaus have imaginary friends?

  • Even his imaginary friends reject his hi fives.

  • @ashliski that poor lonely kid

  • @ashliski do you know how much pot he smokes?

  • @ashliski not since his 23 wickets in the last 3 tests. ;)

  • Johnson is different to Flintoff and so it's different to make a conclusion to who is better.

    I believe Johnson improving batsman and Freddie has proven he is a better bowler - yet..

    Freddie has a bowler before a all-rounder, like Johnson..

  • Johnson is a better bowler.... And a more destructive batsman, And is still Improving

  • To be honest, I don't think he is.

    Flintoff got England through bowling reverse swing, something MJ didn't get.

    Flintoff got a century in a Ashes test, MJ hasn't.

    But I don't like MJ's left-army slingy action either.

    I maintain that they are different, MJ is foremost a Test bowler who can bat with natural ability, hense a ODI All-rounder.

    A bit like Wasim Akram's attitude to the game, but not in the same league.

  • How many ashes series has flintoff been in compared to johnson? Flintoff's Bowling average is 32, With a batting average of 31,& flintoff's Best bowling figures are 5/58. Johnsons Bowling average is 28, and his batting average is 30, (& that will Improve, because he used to just be a bowler. & he is still getting better) & johnsons best bowling figs are 8/61. Flintoff Debut 1998, Johnson debut 2007, And johnson has already taken more then half of the wickets flintoff did in his entire career!

  • (Continuing)& there isn't anything wrong with his slingy action, Batsman find it harder to pick the ball out of his hand, He gets more angle across the right handers, (wich helps his cutters alot)He dosn't swing the ball consistently, But that dosn't matter, Because he won't swing it for say 2 overs(deliberate) And then out of nowhere he gets one to swing back into the right handers, Which gets him ALOT of wickets! He was in horrible form in the ashes, But the last 2 games he got some form back.

  • No there isn't anything wrong, I just don't think it's orthodox bowling action. Broad for England uses cutters also, but don't forget these were English pitches. Freddie has bowled consistantly well on most pitches.

    I know MJ hasn't been in many ashes - because of his age, but England aren't exactly the force they were... nor are many test playing sides. Johnson is not an all-rounder though, in my opinion.

  • dinner, movie, bottom sex

  • Hilfy=top wicket taker in the ashes

  • bit weird u say it nw , god i h8 ppl who think they no it all wen they see the stats on the tv . i bet at the start u wer saying johnson goin to b leading wicket taker

  • dude please, chill, i just said that when he was a few weeks back, i swear every time i make a simple comment i am hated and an argument is started against me, id love it if i was given the privelage to watch videos without being hated come on man just chill

  • CA TOOOOI VUI

  • Yes that's how we say TV.

  • STOP GETTING FUCKING INJURED!!!! AAAARGH!

    it makes me mad :( he could be better than Flintoff :(

  • He is better than Flintoff.

  • no he is not better than flintoff, he is a better batsman at the moment but as a bowler he is useful but not game changing.

  • is he hell better than flintoff no one is as good as flintoff het ur facts right flintoff is probaly the best bowler in the world his only downfall is his ankle and knee

  • I meant he is better at chess than Flintoff. I didn't realise we were talking about his cricketing ability.

  • There are alot more higher wicket tackers than Flintoff mate. I'd say he is Englands best player.. His captain abilities are shithouse losing the Ashes 5-0 in 06/07.

  • Best bowler in the world that took 7 wickets in the Ashes? lol

  • True and False.

    Watson has consistancy in his batting, unlike his bowling.

  • That's how Hilfy roles!

  • Lol, I saw him live in the Ashes, should've asked him to watch this video on my bro-in-law's iPhone to see his reaction!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more