ppl dont forget to rate theese religious propaganda videos. especially the islamic extremists are very well organized and relentlessly promote their religion! don't let them have youtube!
of course they will use the best shape... that is because the bees building wrong shapes will die > only the best adapted will survive > their children will survive > genes given to the next generation will let them do the same things ( which are the good ones to do). if they eventually evolve and start doing something else..... (the evolution made them better > they survive ), the evolution made it harder for them > they'll die. this way such "genius" species as bees evolve
oh my goodness. how nature can be expained in various ways. Not trying to prove anything here but must ask a question, which i would assume such text and video is put forth for. Why?
much vidio and text is put forth because some who presume to know gos , wish to help others see that mercifull loving mercyfull god by his works as well
some will pull appart a thing of living beauty to find out why [or where the beauty ends ] others know there is no end , god gives logic infinite, microscopic to macro , see gods hand in everything he saw into being
The genes they inherited from their wasp ancestors.. although teaching is quite a misleading term to describe it, inspired is better but still alittle off...aw well not bad for a 1400 year old text.
The video implies bees started making the cones that way deliberately, that without supernatural causes they'd have to see to do so or be taught to do so (which is entirely wrong) and that somehow that is an indication that your holy book is true - all of which is pretty illogical and ignorant.
The bees do not connect each cell at six points. They make them round and as closely connected as possible. Wasps do the same, but their material does not have the same physical properties as wax. Only wax, by physical force that the bees most likely are not aware of, get pulled into a hexagonal shape. And if you could read, you would realize that I already said so.
i visited your channel[if you had real evidence it should be made easy to read [it isnt] that speaks for itself
i randomly clicked on some kid assembling a brain [from many parts , yet unable to explain its evoltionary steps
saw some nutter talking about molecular genetics [yet unable to say how the extra molicules formed from pregsisting dna replications of egsisting dna compliment
Oh god. Sorry, I've been studying bees with several books, and people just shouldn't upload videos on subjects they do not comprehend. The hexagonal shape is due to physical forces and the material of the cones. The original cones the BEES make are ROUND. You can see that on the fresh cones before they turn hexagonal.
I have worked with bees with one of my professors whose field of study is the visual perception of bees. I most likely know by far more about bees than you do, but yes, you can always find more about bees.
Assalamualaiykum warahmatullahi wa barakatu, wa maghfiratu, jazakaAllah bro for sharing this video, may Allah swt reward you with al-firdous InshaAllah ameen thumma ameen!
This is non-sequitor. Since we have little evidence for any possibility, we assume it was God. I see this as evolution, because if God were to create it, it would be perfect. It is not, but it shows homologous structures to other creatures, so we can infer it may have evolved.
1oneungergod1, please tell me where you see is any sense in comparing pebbles, which do not reproduce, have no genes and are not alive, to living things.
Also, going from sand to rock is erosion done backwards. Why would any process in nature run backwards?
ever heard of sedimentary rock genious ? conglometate ,or layered , rocks have a CYCLE ,IT WEArs down , then re agrigates into lesser rocks ,natures cycle is circular, sedimentary rock subduces and remerges in part when the volcano spits them out ,wears down becomes sedimentary etc
Yes! it is a theory! So is gravity and orbit and nuclear fusion! It is theory because it is a well supported scientifically observed phenomenon. Have you seen the sun turn hydrogen into helium? No? Then it is just a crazy theory based on nothing right? NO! Speciation has also been observed so stop using that ridiculous assertion.
cear science mind im grieving the passing of my brother gravity has its theories [but plainly is fact [fall down from a great height] the orbits are plain fact nuke fision[fact] ie it has poroven its theory with a ''BIG' bang[ie ignore it to your perel [its fact ;science proving its theory into fact] evolution is a theory replicate[even a single cell] [made by the theory] then evolve it into multicell [prove [validate] your theory
Theory in science is a model of facts and observations that confirm a hypothesis and accurately predicts future phenomenon. Evolution is a great THEORY, I am sorry for your loss, I too lost my father at a young age. The truth is we don't need to evolve an animal to prove evolution, the single cell is abiogenesis and we're working on it. Within science evolution has been validated and is in use in computer prog. to make your life better. Go to wiki and type 'list of transitional fossils' pls.
how long [evo] to prove the theory from the retorcle [ie validation]
does this flawed evutionary THEORY have constant predictors or are they unable to sustain a constant prediction[more likely some astronomical ratio of epectation
put evolution into the evo calculation
whats it prodict [more of the same [wow] im impressed
evo sci states evolution a constant[genomic stasis is THE constant]
The twon theories are not incompatible. We have evolved, thats a proven fact. What we evolved from, we are not sure. This is, in my opinion, where God created us, and then we evolved.
But your theory is not proven, and you demand me to prove mine? What hypocracy! I have already proven my case.
Well yes. Besides genetics, homologous structures, geographical distribution, and trends of climate and species growth, there is no evidence for evolution. But the things I mentioned are enough for any scholar. Now can you prove creationism?
at miosis they sepperate [to be subverted under genomic norm if ressesive , or be selected out in normal mating populations by natural [selective ] mate selection
change is minimised by sexual reproduction,
i began my studdy believing the lie of evolution ,in time i realised the theory was invalidated simply by mendelic laws
Maybe you missed out when they mentioned that genes mix, warp, or mutate. The process you desxribed about the finches, yes they are fiches, but they also evolved. Studying the different levels of classification show that we all have homologous structures.
the warping you speak about is normal chromosonal behaviour that preserves their info[did they not warp they would intertangle much more causing more crossovers and also more knots [a knot by the way sicnifies a break where segments of rna begin and end
clasification by latin naming of features means nothing certainly not decendance
[classifying like with like isnt mutation that brings change;ie evolution]
further ''genes '' dont mix ,they are loosly speaking segments of chromosonal sections that create rna segmants , these segments are like computer programs for other cellular structures that process into other parts the make the cells foot building blocks , ammino acids , proteens etc
its not as simple dude to generate the rna is one step
to run its program it need the right recepters
no evolutionist 'gets' that far , because they only pretend knowing
do explain [oh clever locked 8] what is a hommologous structure
look up phenotype while your at it , and genotype , hoomo zygous ,hetro zygous ,dominant . ressesive , mendelic inheritance ,dipold reproduction ,and many other true science terms from the science of genetics [not the THEORY of evolution]
i studied pigions as well [20 years ] hollander and levi took darwins micro evolution within a species much further [molecular biology now further again
evolution slips between the cracks thats why ir remains a crack pot theory
His logic? You see efficiency in nature and say Allah did it. Umm, efficiency is good for a species, so why would nature not refine populations of bees that survive because beneficial mutations changed their behavior? Not thinking and saying God or Allah did it is just lazy and unsupported. This flimsy argument doesn't actually use logic, it just says this is how I am told it happened, people have told a story that says this for thousands of years. They have a book to tell them.
replicate [evolve something] anything just proove YOUR [theory] evolve anything] [FIRST} then speculate about evolving believe as you will make [but] one trheory [story like it valid un able to be rebutted] prove your THEORY is a REAL science [FIRST] [then dare to speculate]
Go find out about all the animals/plants we observe speciating [evolution] and the transitional fossils that show animals no human has ever seen alive that dominated the entire earth for millions of years, no not dinosaurs. While your at it PROVE your HYPOTHESIS that GOD did everything 6000 years ago and that all we see that points to evolution is Satin's work.
you [nor we] never saw no evolution[nor evolving][learn the limitations of the theory dude]
retard think bro [i prove god to you just because you show no understanding of the theory of evolution[yet claim its right to god ship ahead of the creator god]
evolve your self[test your theory] before it disrespects all science with its deceptions
I like bees to, dont forget they are born from the cone.
But I wonder why muslims make so much trouble in the world if they have a good example.
koertje 3 months ago
Assalamu Alaykum wa rohmatullohi wa barakatuh,thank u for video,jzakallohu xoyron.Masha Allah
reyhan2686 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ppl dont forget to rate theese religious propaganda videos. especially the islamic extremists are very well organized and relentlessly promote their religion! don't let them have youtube!
MWcrazyhorse 2 years ago
It starts well, almost plagiarizing Darwin, and somehow ends affirming religious fundamentalism.
Sorry but I don't see any connection with the behavior of bees and what some Arab claiming magical powers said.
mortald 3 years ago 4
LMFAO! Phascolarctos pwnd this video.
RealityBend 3 years ago
of course they will use the best shape... that is because the bees building wrong shapes will die > only the best adapted will survive > their children will survive > genes given to the next generation will let them do the same things ( which are the good ones to do). if they eventually evolve and start doing something else..... (the evolution made them better > they survive ), the evolution made it harder for them > they'll die. this way such "genius" species as bees evolve
laschenpregung 4 years ago 3
great
one day somoene will claim
even atoms can think
see,how perfect they move
if they didnt,there would be chaos
so it "shows" us they also think
hit your head to the wall,dude
maybe it will start working then
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
Another example of someone not understanding evolution and seeing magic where what is actually happening is pretty simple and entirely logical.
My advice, go back to school, you must have missed everything you were taught!
joebot1 4 years ago 2
looooooooooool
ok,sorry mr evillotion :P
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
Wow, you really showed him there. If you can't win with arguments, resort to "humour".
As joebot1 is saying: another clear example of utter disunderstanding of evolution.
Qlkjsdo 4 years ago
are u sure he even watched the vid?
sorry
lol
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
I am!.
It was tedious and frustrating, filled with half baked rubbish and missinformation I'm afraid.
joebot1 3 years ago
;P .
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
evolutionists are klike flies
just because they think dead meat food dosnt mean it is food
we visit them they delete posts , selete the facts we put up , then they come here and play little games [counting on gods mercies perhaps too much]
give to god that science can not replicate , science that is only unreplicatable theory isnt science
replicate [prove it]then present fact not theory
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
oh my goodness. how nature can be expained in various ways. Not trying to prove anything here but must ask a question, which i would assume such text and video is put forth for. Why?
benmerkenhof 4 years ago
dear ben
much vidio and text is put forth because some who presume to know gos , wish to help others see that mercifull loving mercyfull god by his works as well
some will pull appart a thing of living beauty to find out why [or where the beauty ends ] others know there is no end , god gives logic infinite, microscopic to macro , see gods hand in everything he saw into being
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
Salam alaikum Brother,
BarakAllahufeek!
QDJMan 4 years ago
who is teaching bees to create beehives?
The genes they inherited from their wasp ancestors.. although teaching is quite a misleading term to describe it, inspired is better but still alittle off...aw well not bad for a 1400 year old text.
TheFarcicalCourt 4 years ago
man,u must be deluded if u think that,chances can have taught them to make them.
you can never draw the picture of a beehive perfectly without using any "tools"
but anyway,u need to think more
u will never see God with your eyes.
u can "see" by your mind,logic
hope u will do it one day
peace
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
hm..... archeopteryx would like a word with you.
RealityBend 3 years ago 2
Thank you for this clip, so beautiful and the words of Allah is the true words of Him the Almighty.
Thank you, and dont bother those who reject this, it is in their heart..they wont believe what ever evidence you have Quran 2:6
..and some wants to know. and this clip along with your others are great. Bless you
Mahdiarmy 4 years ago
salaam
thanx
;)
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
your all videos r AWESOME.Subhanallah.Allah is Awesome.Wat nice animals.Elhamdolillah
rukiyefr 4 years ago
"so,what's wrong with the vid?"
The video implies bees started making the cones that way deliberately, that without supernatural causes they'd have to see to do so or be taught to do so (which is entirely wrong) and that somehow that is an indication that your holy book is true - all of which is pretty illogical and ignorant.
ThePhascolarctos 4 years ago 3
Dont be so arrogant, do you think bees inteded to create circular cells in their hives if they connected each cell at six points - it wouldnt work.
If you claim to be a 'scholar' on the topic, you make very poor inferences.
khalidsafir 4 years ago
No, I don't think they intended that.
The bees do not connect each cell at six points. They make them round and as closely connected as possible. Wasps do the same, but their material does not have the same physical properties as wax. Only wax, by physical force that the bees most likely are not aware of, get pulled into a hexagonal shape. And if you could read, you would realize that I already said so.
ThePhascolarctos 4 years ago
don't tell us stories phasco...what the..
explain us how they finish the beehive perfectly,although all start from different corners?
what?
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
That's on my channel, as you requested on there.
ThePhascolarctos 4 years ago
i've jumped to it :P
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
i visited your channel[if you had real evidence it should be made easy to read [it isnt] that speaks for itself
i randomly clicked on some kid assembling a brain [from many parts , yet unable to explain its evoltionary steps
saw some nutter talking about molecular genetics [yet unable to say how the extra molicules formed from pregsisting dna replications of egsisting dna compliment
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
Oh god. Sorry, I've been studying bees with several books, and people just shouldn't upload videos on subjects they do not comprehend. The hexagonal shape is due to physical forces and the material of the cones. The original cones the BEES make are ROUND. You can see that on the fresh cones before they turn hexagonal.
ThePhascolarctos 4 years ago
so,what's wrong with the vid?
btw,u can find much more about the bees
peace
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
I have worked with bees with one of my professors whose field of study is the visual perception of bees. I most likely know by far more about bees than you do, but yes, you can always find more about bees.
ThePhascolarctos 4 years ago
once again highflyingdutchman u done it again mashaallah for another encouraging video!!Allahu akbar!!!!
obisitz 4 years ago
Assalamualaiykum warahmatullahi wa barakatu, wa maghfiratu, jazakaAllah bro for sharing this video, may Allah swt reward you with al-firdous InshaAllah ameen thumma ameen!
unityisstrength 4 years ago
This doesn't disprove evolution. It actually helps prove it.
Locke840 4 years ago
dear locke ate for nothing]
yes we all can see the three sided honey comb
doubling up into the 6 sides
please define its evolution
yes before the bee 'got its wings , it clearly used legs and ladders to get the honey
before it learned tio navigate it used tiny maps [but bro who drew them
who taught them to read them
before it found honey is was carnivore ;it used to eat athiests [or sip necter [as u] from jinn]
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
This is non-sequitor. Since we have little evidence for any possibility, we assume it was God. I see this as evolution, because if God were to create it, it would be perfect. It is not, but it shows homologous structures to other creatures, so we can infer it may have evolved.
B.T.W., bees haven't always collected honey.
Locke840 4 years ago
evolution is a theory
there is little evidence because any evidence isnt proof it is deduction its like collecting pebbles and saying this is how rocks 'evolved'
see this white sand, evo into red sand .black sand into red pebble .black pabble .white pebble .rock etc
sure it looks logical , but cant ever be validated to prove evolution,
nor do/ will /can fossils [rock]
if science ;replicate' but one
make but one like it
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
1oneungergod1, please tell me where you see is any sense in comparing pebbles, which do not reproduce, have no genes and are not alive, to living things.
Also, going from sand to rock is erosion done backwards. Why would any process in nature run backwards?
ThePhascolarctos 4 years ago
pha scolar
evolutionists line up thier fossil rocks
call thier creative theory evolution
its seems logiclly based,this evolving into that
just like my rock egsample
ever heard of sedimentary rock genious ? conglometate ,or layered , rocks have a CYCLE ,IT WEArs down , then re agrigates into lesser rocks ,natures cycle is circular, sedimentary rock subduces and remerges in part when the volcano spits them out ,wears down becomes sedimentary etc
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
1oneundergod1-
"evolution is a theory"
Yes! it is a theory! So is gravity and orbit and nuclear fusion! It is theory because it is a well supported scientifically observed phenomenon. Have you seen the sun turn hydrogen into helium? No? Then it is just a crazy theory based on nothing right? NO! Speciation has also been observed so stop using that ridiculous assertion.
scienceminded 4 years ago 2
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
Theory in science is a model of facts and observations that confirm a hypothesis and accurately predicts future phenomenon. Evolution is a great THEORY, I am sorry for your loss, I too lost my father at a young age. The truth is we don't need to evolve an animal to prove evolution, the single cell is abiogenesis and we're working on it. Within science evolution has been validated and is in use in computer prog. to make your life better. Go to wiki and type 'list of transitional fossils' pls.
scienceminded 4 years ago
predict the future?
its a numbers game
what you think you can 'predict'
evo =lie
how long [evo] to prove the theory from the retorcle [ie validation]
does this flawed evutionary THEORY have constant predictors or are they unable to sustain a constant prediction[more likely some astronomical ratio of epectation
put evolution into the evo calculation
whats it prodict [more of the same [wow] im impressed
evo sci states evolution a constant[genomic stasis is THE constant]
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
locked 40 , we see the same evidence
one says god
you chose chance[yet your scientists cant replicte ,even a simple cell]
yet by thier THEORY ,chose to take god from the whole of your reasoning by logical misscalculation
we can infure much ,we chose to see the hand of a loving [living ] god ,you chose to believe random evolutions
god did make it perfect [not by natural selection ,but great design]
BTW prove your btw
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
The twon theories are not incompatible. We have evolved, thats a proven fact. What we evolved from, we are not sure. This is, in my opinion, where God created us, and then we evolved.
But your theory is not proven, and you demand me to prove mine? What hypocracy! I have already proven my case.
Locke840 4 years ago
dear locked
evolutionists are all bluff and wind
they say prove it
yet have never made [proved ] thier THEORY fact
they are unable to replicate a single evolution
most have made no study even of genetics [of itself designed to achieve genomic stability
micro evolution pwithinspecie genome]is what you have
macro evolution [into new species]is the lie
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
Well yes. Besides genetics, homologous structures, geographical distribution, and trends of climate and species growth, there is no evidence for evolution. But the things I mentioned are enough for any scholar. Now can you prove creationism?
Locke840 4 years ago
i dont need to prove creation
genotype v phenotype
fossils are looks like phenotype
reversion to wild type [darwins pigions proved MICRO evolution within a species [i replicated his studdies
isolating a species of fibches mutated the finch phenotype yet all were still finches,
climate is a modifior that allows micro evolution not macro into a new species
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
give to me that your a mutation
answer has one chomosone strand modified or both
at miosis they sepperate [to be subverted under genomic norm if ressesive , or be selected out in normal mating populations by natural [selective ] mate selection
change is minimised by sexual reproduction,
i began my studdy believing the lie of evolution ,in time i realised the theory was invalidated simply by mendelic laws
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
And yes, you do have to prove creation.
Locke840 4 years ago
Maybe you missed out when they mentioned that genes mix, warp, or mutate. The process you desxribed about the finches, yes they are fiches, but they also evolved. Studying the different levels of classification show that we all have homologous structures.
Locke840 4 years ago
locked 8
the term is cross over
the warping you speak about is normal chromosonal behaviour that preserves their info[did they not warp they would intertangle much more causing more crossovers and also more knots [a knot by the way sicnifies a break where segments of rna begin and end
clasification by latin naming of features means nothing certainly not decendance
[classifying like with like isnt mutation that brings change;ie evolution]
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
further ''genes '' dont mix ,they are loosly speaking segments of chromosonal sections that create rna segmants , these segments are like computer programs for other cellular structures that process into other parts the make the cells foot building blocks , ammino acids , proteens etc
its not as simple dude to generate the rna is one step
to run its program it need the right recepters
no evolutionist 'gets' that far , because they only pretend knowing
but its all bluff dude
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
do explain [oh clever locked 8] what is a hommologous structure
look up phenotype while your at it , and genotype , hoomo zygous ,hetro zygous ,dominant . ressesive , mendelic inheritance ,dipold reproduction ,and many other true science terms from the science of genetics [not the THEORY of evolution]
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
who is 'they' locked gate
the finches never 'described ' nothing
thier differences wasnt even noted by darwin at the time
a bird specialist pointed out their different structure yet by bird classification was able to realise they were all finches
he mentionede pigions
thus darwin studdied pigions
i studied pigions as well
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
continued
i studied pigions as well [20 years ] hollander and levi took darwins micro evolution within a species much further [molecular biology now further again
evolution slips between the cracks thats why ir remains a crack pot theory
not a science
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
u really have problems with your logic locke
i won't share these videos with you anymore,not to make it worse
peace.
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
His logic? You see efficiency in nature and say Allah did it. Umm, efficiency is good for a species, so why would nature not refine populations of bees that survive because beneficial mutations changed their behavior? Not thinking and saying God or Allah did it is just lazy and unsupported. This flimsy argument doesn't actually use logic, it just says this is how I am told it happened, people have told a story that says this for thousands of years. They have a book to tell them.
scienceminded 4 years ago 2
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
Go find out about all the animals/plants we observe speciating [evolution] and the transitional fossils that show animals no human has ever seen alive that dominated the entire earth for millions of years, no not dinosaurs. While your at it PROVE your HYPOTHESIS that GOD did everything 6000 years ago and that all we see that points to evolution is Satin's work.
scienceminded 4 years ago 2
dear sci mind
transitional fossils are fraud
you [nor we] never saw no evolution[nor evolving][learn the limitations of the theory dude]
retard think bro [i prove god to you just because you show no understanding of the theory of evolution[yet claim its right to god ship ahead of the creator god]
evolve your self[test your theory] before it disrespects all science with its deceptions
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
Assalamualaikum Wr Wb,thanks for sharing Bro, may god bless you. Jazakallahkhair'an...
Azeem111 4 years ago
Subhan Allah there are signs of the almighty in everything!! Bees are very complex insects!!
kfoury90 4 years ago
MashALLAH another excellent video from you brother!! Jazak ALLAH Khair! :O) I was going to say I 'buzz' off your video's haha :O)
BoriChumba 4 years ago
Nice upload.
Mujahid1 4 years ago
Jazakallah khair...
Subhanallah..
sgirl2007 4 years ago
SubhanAllah...
Jazk Allah Khier brother for all these amazing videos...May Allah bless you..:)
alshaimaa 4 years ago
SalaamAlaikum, SUBHANALLAH ,JAZAKALLAH KHAIR.
spiritlite 4 years ago
assalamualaikum
jazakallah khair
subhanallah:)))
WhisperOfDeen 4 years ago
each flower is a multiple of gods revealed good
each good deed becomes a flower [thus is honey sweet]
it also is a preservitive [raw honey put on infected cuts can kill ulcers and other skin open wound infections ]
[the raw honey when cut off from air creates hydrgen peroxide
infinite goodness that comes from the good of flowers conveyed via the high priest of healing works ;the bee
god is great
another top vidio bro
salaam
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
the other post should read
raw honey on the skin [sealing off the wound from the air][creates hydrogen pyroxide that sterilises the wound naturally]
gods way
also painfull arthretic joint pain can be relieved by a few bee stings [ for a week or so , its not a cure , but brings medication free relief
blessed be the bee
blessed be [may healing be upon you ]
from god' s miricle
the be
1oneundergod1 4 years ago
surah 16;68 ,and your lord taught the bee to build its cells
16;69''there issues from thier bodies a drink of varying colours , wherin is healing for men;verilly it is sign for those who give it thought
1oneundergod1 4 years ago