Not only did he get an applause, but he was the only one that got an applause. And the faces of the puppet wanna bees when that happened was priceless.
In my opinion, the people in the auditorium in no way represent the majority of Americans so yes, keep them quiet! :) I do not want to hear any more boos for the golden rule.
I'm voting Ron Paul, and before anybody trashes me or puts me down for it, read his policies,books, and what he plans to do, the other candidates are backed by goldman sachs, and big bankers, and the elite, it seems like they just want to be president so they can be king and serve themselves, Ron Paul wants us to be king of our own lives, I heard there was voter fraud in SC btw
Gingrich bused people to his speaking stops , so there was always somebody when he talked. I got the impression that the SC debate , it was his bused/paid support. So , not only was the "Wife" question staged , to allow him free time and to spin it , the crowd was fake/staged.
Just how gulable are people? CNN showed that debate 7 more times before the election. A debate where their Moderator was ripped a new one. If it wasn't staged , they wouldn't have promoted it so much.
They should be held quiet because truth usually gets applause as Paul's statements did. Others are Goldman Sachs stooges with different faces. On the important issues, they are all the same.
Aye, fight and you may die. Run, and you'll live... at least a while. And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin' to trade ALL the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take...
I *am* Newt 'William Wallace' Gingrich! And I see a whole army of my countrymen, here in defiance of tyranny. You've come to fight as free men... and free men you are.
If they don’t allow the audience to express themselves they are just conceding the truth we all already know, when the dust finally settles Newt we be the Republican Nominee then go on to defeat Obama in the Presidential Debates and then finally crush Obama in the November Election.
Without the audience being free to express themselves by cheering, booing or clapping the debates became less of a gauge to determine who won! I hope the rest of the candidates agree with me and Newt that the audience at these debates should be able to express themselves in a civil manner without restrictions from the moderator.
Brian Williams and NBC News limiting the free expression of the audience at last night’s debate is the typical behavior of seditious progressive democrats that promotes political segregation which fosters totalitarianism within the lame stream media especially ‘Progressives Blogs’ that have little tolerance for conservative thought or talking points.
@dugfmjamul Do some research and look into the 2008 debates. It is up on drudgereport and they had many debates like last nights on last election cycle.
I believe that the reason audience was directed not to respond, was so there would not be complaints that RP was getting the shaft when it came to answering questions.
And how about the question to RP about the everglades. Why was that directed toward him? Because they knew the answer would not look positive to FL.
But ya know what? I see people getting wise to it all.
everyone should know by now that anyone other than the great RON PAUL is just a paid actor representing the evil of this world...fuck em all......RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT 2012
In the SC debate it was clear that the audience was biased. They started booing in the middle of ron pauls speaking. If this were a classroom they would have to get a time out. The crowd can be a big factor. So then we must ask"can we trust the crowd?" Could a crowd be controlled by someone in the shadows? Yes. But really the truth is the crowd sometimes can be disruptive of the essential purpose of a debate. I think the restraint was well intended and effective. Too bad the debate sucked.
Ron Paul could have used a little more airtime last night. In spite of his less than 6 minutes, he did well and got applause in spite of the applause ban. I like hearing the audience reaction in future debates, and that has nothing at all to do with Newt's threat to boycot.
Not only did he get an applause, but he was the only one that got an applause. And the faces of the puppet wanna bees when that happened was priceless.
2012weareone 4 weeks ago
even though there was a no clapping during debate in place...I found it just heart warming that Ron Paul did get an applause, Ron Paul 2012.
2012weareone 4 weeks ago
In my opinion, the people in the auditorium in no way represent the majority of Americans so yes, keep them quiet! :) I do not want to hear any more boos for the golden rule.
WorldsFinalEvents 1 month ago
They should be quiet,so ppl can listen to issues at hand and think..should'nt be like a high school pep rally...GO RON PAUL 2012
gcatledge 1 month ago
gingrich doesnt have a fan base. neither do any of the candidates except the doc
chopin999 1 month ago
I'm voting Ron Paul, and before anybody trashes me or puts me down for it, read his policies,books, and what he plans to do, the other candidates are backed by goldman sachs, and big bankers, and the elite, it seems like they just want to be president so they can be king and serve themselves, Ron Paul wants us to be king of our own lives, I heard there was voter fraud in SC btw
MediaNKinG18 1 month ago
I do
brandonbuckman86 1 month ago
Good! Give it up...no one wants to hear what you have to say anyway!
patsy128 1 month ago
Gingrich bused people to his speaking stops , so there was always somebody when he talked. I got the impression that the SC debate , it was his bused/paid support. So , not only was the "Wife" question staged , to allow him free time and to spin it , the crowd was fake/staged.
Just how gulable are people? CNN showed that debate 7 more times before the election. A debate where their Moderator was ripped a new one. If it wasn't staged , they wouldn't have promoted it so much.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012
RonPaulForPres012 1 month ago
@garrethdavis Nope sorry it was from 8pm central time til 8:56pm is when the final question was done.
matlarson10 1 month ago
btw the debate was an hour 40 as far as I know
garrethdavis 1 month ago
Fuck Newt.
garrethdavis 1 month ago 3
They should be held quiet because truth usually gets applause as Paul's statements did. Others are Goldman Sachs stooges with different faces. On the important issues, they are all the same.
bladeproject1 1 month ago
he wants to debate against obama and be the president - i dont believe people actually vote for him
PHONEYPOLITICS 1 month ago
I remember when I recorded my T.V with a camera...Oh shit wait, I'm not a dumbass.
PatarHD 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Gingrich was nothing with out being able to play to the crowds.
roland20002000 1 month ago
Without the cheers he knows he'll just look like a bigot.
thorspinky 1 month ago 5
the problem arises when filling the seats, could they not pack the house with shrills?
taetoe1 1 month ago
Ever hear of freedom of speech Brian Williams, u mad bro?
kirbz01 1 month ago
Will you fight?
Aye, fight and you may die. Run, and you'll live... at least a while. And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin' to trade ALL the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take...
OUR FREEDOM!
dugfmjamul 1 month ago
I *am* Newt 'William Wallace' Gingrich! And I see a whole army of my countrymen, here in defiance of tyranny. You've come to fight as free men... and free men you are.
What will you do with that freedom?
dugfmjamul 1 month ago
If they don’t allow the audience to express themselves they are just conceding the truth we all already know, when the dust finally settles Newt we be the Republican Nominee then go on to defeat Obama in the Presidential Debates and then finally crush Obama in the November Election.
dugfmjamul 1 month ago
Without the audience being free to express themselves by cheering, booing or clapping the debates became less of a gauge to determine who won! I hope the rest of the candidates agree with me and Newt that the audience at these debates should be able to express themselves in a civil manner without restrictions from the moderator.
dugfmjamul 1 month ago
Brian Williams and NBC News limiting the free expression of the audience at last night’s debate is the typical behavior of seditious progressive democrats that promotes political segregation which fosters totalitarianism within the lame stream media especially ‘Progressives Blogs’ that have little tolerance for conservative thought or talking points.
dugfmjamul 1 month ago
@dugfmjamul Do some research and look into the 2008 debates. It is up on drudgereport and they had many debates like last nights on last election cycle.
matlarson10 1 month ago
@dugfmjamul
I believe that the reason audience was directed not to respond, was so there would not be complaints that RP was getting the shaft when it came to answering questions.
And how about the question to RP about the everglades. Why was that directed toward him? Because they knew the answer would not look positive to FL.
But ya know what? I see people getting wise to it all.
Ron Paul 2012 The Champion Of The Constitution ;]
Mags
Magluvin 1 month ago
everyone should know by now that anyone other than the great RON PAUL is just a paid actor representing the evil of this world...fuck em all......RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT 2012
zedubman 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul is rallying in Florida.
Watch the debate on 1/26 in Jacksonville and help vote during the FL primary.
v v v v Live 2012 Live Polls and Streaming Debates
2012ElectionCentral 1 month ago
Newt Gingrich Eats Babies!
PrimeConsciousness 1 month ago
@PrimeConsciousness No he doesnt he just makes them work as janitors lol.. cant believe he said that
MarshallLore 1 month ago
In the SC debate it was clear that the audience was biased. They started booing in the middle of ron pauls speaking. If this were a classroom they would have to get a time out. The crowd can be a big factor. So then we must ask"can we trust the crowd?" Could a crowd be controlled by someone in the shadows? Yes. But really the truth is the crowd sometimes can be disruptive of the essential purpose of a debate. I think the restraint was well intended and effective. Too bad the debate sucked.
77LIGHTSABER 1 month ago
All Gingrich has is a bunch of one-liners that are supposed to draw the audience in. Ron Paul's got the message.
pittsburghsports16 1 month ago
Ron Paul could have used a little more airtime last night. In spite of his less than 6 minutes, he did well and got applause in spite of the applause ban. I like hearing the audience reaction in future debates, and that has nothing at all to do with Newt's threat to boycot.
Go Ron Paul 2012!
davekpghpa 1 month ago
i think if the audience wants to cheer laugh, or boo... there really is no way to stop it... rules or not. Ron Paul 2012
2ruthfox82 1 month ago 9