Added: 4 years ago
From: AlexSobol
Views: 92,470
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (81)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Drive a CVT with paddle shifters and it's completely different... I like a nice H box manual but even the Veyron has magnesium paddle shifters. I have something the Veyron has! haha xD

  • Woah..thats so weird! i think i'll stick to my 5 speed..

  • CVT has room for improvement in its design, and perhaps a little more focus on either performance or economy in the programming of it would help. but ultimately, the theory is solid: keep the engine at it's peak horsepower (not peak torque) under throttle. the fun is taken away tho by the fact that there is no change in acceleration (or "jerk", the third order differential of displacement), so it feels slower. often, the acceleration (2nd order d2y/dx2) is at least on par with the engine size

  • cvt  is bad trans not lancer is bad.

    see the acceleration with manual

  • WOW so slow!!! That car is shittt!1

  • pffff it sucks

  • NISSAN wanna be

  • @chromedout how the fuck is it a nissan wannabe you sound stupid mitsubishi is totally different from nissan

  • is driving a cvt the same way as automatic? (Park, Reverse, N, Drive, 1, 2)

  • yeah well no 2 just 1

  • nope, its park reverse neutral drive then paddle shift/ bump shift

  • wow that car is much slower than I thought. Its about as fast as my pickup truck.

  • look at the gauge its km/h

    its not mph

  • I'm aware of that.

  • lmfao

  • CVT aint made for performance , basically it sucks

  • Isn't made for performance? Right, I guess that's the reason then when you floor it, the CVT constantly keeps the engine revving at its peak... no lag from shifting....

  • @SPTSuperSprinter156 Actually it isn't made for performance at all. Instead of having 5 or 6 direct gears, view it as "multiple" gears in between. The CVT is built for economy. (I know your post was from a long time ago)

  • most cars. not all

  • what is the max speed of this car?

  • Bullshit! Where's my M3?

  • pasodeminick:

    > Bullshit! Where's my M3?

    In a septic tank.

  • in ur ass mate

  • nah, you just have to shift the CVT to the minus sign for the rpm to drop as soon as you've reached your desired speed

  • just use the paddle shifters if u want a lower gear

  • imortalspade: cvts do not have gears.

  • If you have a GTS like mine (its my first car) you can u the paddle shifters to drop gear although it automatic and save some gas. I'm not a racer, but i think ur looking at more a Evo and stuff, this car just a tad behind for racing with just 156 HP. u can get some air dams and really tear it up in one of theses. my best friend has a used 2005 Evo, and he does race. yea, he is great at it.

  • cvt: lovely dutch invention by DAF when the made passenger cars. aka Variomatic.

  • IS THAT MPH??? SLOW POKE!

  • My Lancer GTS Cvt rules. You losers who say it sucks don't know shit. I have driven alot of cars and this one is the best. Fast as hell and great gas mileage. I have smoked BMW M3's Mustangs and even a Corvette. This car has only 153 horsepower but it drives like it has 300! I have gone over 100mph easy and 124mph governed it just as quick. Who the hell needs and Evo when I got this beast!

  • hahahahahaahahah!!!!!!!!!!! you must be joking that said that you smoke corvette mustangs and M3 and that car drives like it has 300 hp!!! hahahaha that crap do 0-100 in 9.5 sec maybe the corvettes and stuff say....haha stupid kid that think he could win and they let you hit the gas and they as normal hahahahahaahhahha

  • 0-100 8.6 secs

  • yeah Im sorry bro as an owner of a gts with CVT and a turbo 240 and previous owner of a built turbo civic, I would have to highly disagree with you beating M3's and mustangs, Ive beaten them to but not in the GTS... As much as I love the car, it is a slow car compared to the ones mentioned. I will go with "peppy" but def not fast

  • Dude I have a 08 lancer es and its a great car overall but cut the crap about smoking corvetes and bmw, after all it's ane economy sedan with REASONABLE performance not a supercar. You know I'm right

  • Yezzir. I'm in college, can't afford a ZR-1 yet. 8)

  • Ok in a drag strip the Lancer is not fast but on the highway the Lancer GTS intimidation factor (looka like an Evo) and me reving it up and driving 80-120mph all the time really messes with Papa in Corvette or Executive in M3. I have the balls to go pedal to the metal and pass them up. No one knows what kind of Lancer it is 120mph passing them up! It rules!

  • Dude you need to have your briain examined. It seems very obvious that you dont know the first tjong about cars or automobiles. The engine is so rough and so not smooth that its not even worth my time explaining how bad it is. The car is all look no substance. As a suggestion, please do not over use your brain if you have no clue of what your talking about. The bottom line is the GTS is a great looking package wearing diapers instead of a tuxedo.

  • I am sorry you still have to ride the bus. Still the Lancer GTS rules and I love it.

  • yea dude, really, its a great car, its damn cheap, and a hell lot of fun. im not racer but i took mine out to a track with my dad and we took it to like 150. it was great

  • Bullshit...drag limited to 123mph!

    I should know was going 123mph for about 10 miles today. Unless you modified it.

  • dude, this car is in KM/H not MPH!

  • why would you race a lancer ? if you can buy an evo or sti ?

  • 'Cause most lancer owners CAN'T buy an evo or STi.

  • sucks

  • i have lancer ex but i dont know if the ex is gts?:S lol i get 0 to 100 km/h in 9.5 pretty slow :S but i can take down charger 6 clynder to 100 km/h lol

  • Development has already started on a Transmission/ECU override. aka a CVT Controller.

    This way you can put max torque to the ground at fixed RPMs

  • 2007 Lancer ES, my cellphone can´t record more but y cross the 200 Km/h

  • This is why Torque is more important and HP looks good on paper

  • good

  • no duh it has a cvt dual-clutch system it obviously going to sound different with about one REAL gear

  • The EVO X is configured with a Dual Clutch Electronic Manual. It is basically a Manual Transmission but configured to be all electronic and computer controlled.

    The Lancer CVT is based on a pulley system and involves no gears. the two pulleys increase and decrease in size to compliment user input and throttle position. It is programed to be Fuel efficent first and proformance second. Also the software that the CVT is based on is input aware and learns a drivers habits and adapts

  • 2.0 is gr8!!

  • For Russia only 2.0

  • is that a 2.0 or 1.8??

  • why is the car's driver seat on the right? isn't it supposed to be on the left in Russia?

  • hey 08 lancer owner body kits are available on ebay.. just as i thought, the body kit looks evo X but the pics are to small.. 749 buck complete body kit..

  • cvt is awesome, faster than anyone manual gearbox. Look someboring, but is the sound of efficiency

  • yep, when the speed levels off it decreases the RPM saving fuel and money.

  • this totally takes the fun out of driving... the sound of the engine gets too monotonous and boring after it reaches its peak RPM... its just not cool... i'll just stick to my manual transmission

  • i beg to differ, maybe on a normal road, but on a track, give me paddles. It allows you to be way more aggressive with a car. F1/nascar use them for a reason.

  • Williams wanted to us a CVT at one point but got banned by the FIA. The reason why all these race series uses paddles is because that's the best allowed by the governing organizations not because it's the best. For example the DSG box upshift faster the the F1 boxes but they will never be allowed to use it.

  • i agree. sounds kinda awkward

  • nice move

  • they should make a turbo kit for this lol

  • COMING IN DECEMBER

  • coming out on october 13 for Australia!!!

  • its such a nice looking car..but only 152HP why so slow? I mean I know they will come out with something like the old EVO if they already havent..But still should have givin it some more power to go with its mean looks,

  • You thinkn 152 is slow? Think 127... its as much as we get on Dyno.... :( A Short Ram from RRM (roadracemotorsports) brings it up to 133HP max... but it sounds badass IMO... new pulley, new exaust, might give this car a better chance... btw I own an ES, same thing as GTS without the Sportstronic and exterior extras...

    RRM is also working on a turbo as you read!

  • why is the gts model so slow, by that i mean it is suppose to differ from es model in performance.

  • use sequential mode (with the paddle or stick) its fater and saves gas. tha manual tranny clocks in 0-60 at 7.7seconds. with the CVT its at 9seconds.

  • what is the sequential mode :S i always get 9.5 seconds wether it is top tronic or D :S

  • is it going on one gear :S

  • Its called CVT. Haha. Continuous variable transmission :o!

  • great car!!!! i have the "es"

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more