While I agree with this add, it is very presumptuous for the Republicans to tell us that they're the answer. I don't like the Republicans any better then I like the Democrats. The Republicans' agenda simply happens to flow parallel to my own. I don't agree with them, they agree with me.
The big Republican win this November should be sending the following message in no uncertain terms to Washington: Democrats, you're out. Republicans, DON'T FUCK UP.
It's not an embrace of the GOP, it's a rejection of Democrats. Republicans are on probation.
The United States of AmeriCORP. Our military industrial complex is the hired assassin for the CEO elitists behind closed doors. The worst part of all: these guys claim Christ as Saviour while they crucify him afresh with every step of their march of conquest. George W. well knew the loss of 10's of 1000's of innocent lives before he lied to America to invade Iraq. The Bible's prime directive is twofold: never shed innocent blood; and be a man of your word. Our leaders are trustworthy in neither.
@AcePilot101 Obama the worst president? You obviously didn't live in America during the bush years. And I rather vote jimmy carter than mcbush in any day.
I agree with most of that YOPL, this TYRONE character recently had to admit to me that the national deficit increased every year under Clinton (and then tried to change the subject to Bush--which I will admit did nothing but spend us into oblivion, Obama is following in his footsteps) and is now trying to backtrack.
We need a return to fiscal Federalism. Jim DeMint is one of those guys that could do it.
Any "budget balancing" by Clinton was caused by highm tax revenues from a bubble he created, which proceeded to burst before he left office. He handed Bush a huge unemployment problem, an unresolved Banking mandate, and overdue checks on the economy that simply blew up at the same time courtesy of his inactions to prevent 9/11. He had the chance to kill Osama, but gave the orders "let him go."
The Community Reinvestment bust was not Bush, but Clinton's fault.
All viewers of this video have to do is check the archives. I've supplied a few links to CBO data. Spending increases in REAL dollars, minus interest payments on the nat'l debt, REAL annual % change.
In addition, the national debt increased every FY under Clinton (a point TY has already conceded), there can't be a budget surplus when the nat'l debt goes up.
For someone who doesn't know the difference between budget deficit and national deficit it hard to take kooks comments seriously. I already proved that the national debt actually decreased by 9.8% of GDP during Clintons second term while it increased substantially during George H Bush and George W. Bush. I also proved that Clinton gave us a budget surplus while both Bush's and Reagan gave us largest budget deficits in history. Tyrone wins again....and again.....and again.....and again....
@ty- The CBO doesn't "adjust" the numbers according to real time data. You should know this.
Bush2 did have a war to fight, so of course the numbers go up. But, Odumbo has doubled what Bush spent in only 1-year. How else can you categorize that except for reckless spending, resulting in political payoffs to unions, banks, etc?
Reagan had to rebuild the military that Carter decimated during his term. Don't forget, he also crushed the Soviets...
Hey guido, stop listening to Rush limpdick. From 2001-2006 when we had record deficits under a republican congress and a republican president. Not to mention trillion dollar quagmires that our grandkids will be paying for.
Reagan = massive deficits, high unemployment. Bush l =massive deficits, high unemployment. Clinton, budget surplus and low unemployment. Bush ll = massive deficits and high unemployment. Starting to notice a pattern here guido?
90s Conservative GOP Congress + Triangulating Dem. Pres
00s Liberal GOP Congress + Moderate GOP Pres
10s Far Leftist Dem Congress + Far Leftist Dem President
Yes, I spot the trend... when the Conservatives hold the power in Congress the GOP and there's a President who doesn't mind coopting their ideas that things go well.
But when Conservatives are not in Congress Leadership, the spigots open.
2001-2006 A conservative president and GOP controlled congress 2001-2006. Biggest defict in American history, high unemployment. Greatest economic growth in last 50 years - JFK, Johnson and Clinton. Lowest economic growth in last 50 years Bush l and Bush ll. Whoops another pattern
It's a fact that Clinton had a budget surplus according to the congressional budget office and verified by factcheck. Don't know how much more proof you need. Still confused about the difference between national and budget deficit ey? Honestly at this point you have been discredited and exposed as an ignoramus
The dump I took this morning has more meaning and as much thought as this "advertisement" It's like they forgot that the GOP *also* voted for the stimulus, and that it was their previous (fool) President Bush that this whole crap-storm started
UTubekookdetector, I have a serious question I need to ask you. Are you retarded. You continue to argue with me even though you clearly do not know the difference between budget deficit and national deficit. Clinton did indeed hand over a budget surplus to George W. Bush and my source was factcheck. As for the national deficit - As I said earlier Clinton actually reduced it by 9.8% of GDP in his second term. Owned again bitch
There was a surplus of $1.9 billion in fiscal 1999 and $86.4 billion in fiscal 2000 So any way you count it, the federal budget was balanced and the deficit was erased
Factcheck citing statistics form the
congressional budget office Historical Budget Data
Ah yes guido when republicans fuck up it's because they're too liberal, Just about covered all your bases ey? By the way Factcheck (Using statistics from nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office) concluded that " there was a surplus of $1.9 billion in fiscal 1999 and $86.4 billion in fiscal 2000. So any way you count it, the federal budget was balanced and the deficit was erased"
Yo vinnie did you see republican consultant Todd Harris on tv a few weeks ago. Asked what republicans have done for america in the last 20 years he couldn't come up with one thing. Nuff said ey?
This is the worst piece of bullshit partisan attacks from the RNC in quite sometime. Republicans are sorely mistaken if they think that most Independent Americans are going to buy their argument. Unfortunately political parties are organisms whose sole purpose is survival. And that survival comes before the survival of the nation.
Does everyone have to go out against the other Partisan party? We're allon the same team overall, we have different views but does that mean videos like this one need to made? And if so why don't the people who are the root of this video "call out" the president that they're accusing? I'm not sure who I support, and that probably is because i'm an "ignoramus".What do the republicans expect to get done if win, and if they do what'll happen if the change they promise is a rerun from an old prune?
Fact: Under George W Bush and a GOP controlled congress we saw largest budget deficit in american history and we also single greatest rise ever of our national debt.
Its sad to me that people even listen to this and believe it. Im dumbfounded how easy it is to brainwash people in this nation. Just look at the Drug War and the damage it has caused, yet 44% of Americans are scared into thinking its a good thing. Its that minority that has let it happen year after year after year!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
of course we are this way now, thanks to mr bush and the republicans of "no and no and more no, they,re the one,s blocking the progress of our present president, they got their chance the past 8 years and look the way we are now. ....no thanks republicans
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
is it just me...or do people not remember that Bush was the one that first started giving out Billions of Dollars out to Wallstreet.
Obama right now is doing damage control & actually doing something....working on something. this president is actually proactive, unlike the last one.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
so what exactly do you republicans do these days? as far as i can tell, your party is unwilling and unable to deal with the issues of our day. but maybe you've convinced your constituents that legislators shouldn't legislate? now that your "conservative" chief justice has sold our country to the highest bidder, maybe you think your corporate masters prefer you remain dormant, i don't know. curse your stupid jingoist asses & the bankers you rode in on!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Republicans hate big government? As far as I can tell, they increased the size of governemnt for 8 straight years. Oh, but because they didn't pay for it, it's ok, as long as our taxes dont go up! We don't need to worry about a deficit of 13 trillion. 9/11 did no warrant the war in Iraq, or really, a war of occupation in Afganistan. And oh yeah, Bush passed a a 700 billion dollar medicare bill. And guess what. All these things were unfunded. Gratz republicans.
Ok, I was wondering if anyone who properly explain to me the health care reform without adding personal opinions or swearing or biased views. Just the facts, ALL the facts. I have yet to receive an answer from someone. Please, someone just explain that to me, because from what I understand, I don't like it (and I'm a Dem).
First of all, look at it in the eyes of the doctors. They are going to be paid basically the same as a school teacher, and doctors have to go through 12 years of schooling, 4 years of college, 4 med school, 4 residency, so you can understand whyd they be pissed. Becuz of this, doctors will most likely go on strike, meaning that no one anywhere will get any form of treatment unless they know of someone.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"Doctors being paid the same salary as teachers" makes it sound like an insult to teachers. I agree that the more educated should earn more, that I wouldn't want to budge on. I do see a problem with is figuring out why someone has to pay thousands of dollars for a visit to a doctor or why medicine has such a high price and how the Insurance companies abuse the lack of laws to drop patients so they don't have to pay for procedures, that's where reform should come in.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The only thing that this shows one year into his presidency is just how bad the Republicans left the country on their way out. Your way is the way of fear and lies to get the less educated on your side. I know this because I work with Republicans who spout the same uninformed statements about the president that take only seconds to search for and disprove. Yours is the party of old and there is no room in this country for your insensitivity and archaic beliefs.
@beanbomb LOL you're a scared dem w/o a life preserver on a sinking dem ship. Face it, the liberals' days are numbered. America has woken up, and realized conservative values are what we need. (Bush regretfully did not stick to those values). Brown and the 2 governorships that went D to R are the canaries in the mine. CHANGE is coming!!! 2010/2012
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Funny thing is I'm not a Democrat but I'm sure as hell not a Republican. How exactly is it that we "need conservative values"? you mean to say you want to impose laws based on your religious views? That we need to go back to leadership who thinks as if the year is still 1950? If anyone's days are numbered are all the aging republicans who want to rule with one hand on the bible and the other in a stack of money from big corporations. Hypocrisy at its best!
@narukyuubi, the republicans also had help in bringing down this country from democrats, too; the republicans did not have a filibuster proof senate, narukyuubi.
@cartmanfan0316 true. I know that the democrats had a majority in 2006 and even earlier, there were few who went along with Bush (he had to or else he would get little done). I get why were are frustrated, why Obama is being bashed, but it annoys me when he takes the blame. It's not his fault. Sure he hasn't done enough and has a long way to go before our economy improves. And it isn't just Republicans who annoy me but Democrats do too. Stop pointing fingers and do something about it.
You make a good point (though I should have been clear and said the executive branch). I am sorry about that. But, why don't people reserve their opinions until after his term is done. A year is not enough to fix the damage of a messed up economy. Great Depression, from what I understand, was saved mostly because of WWII...and that took years. I'm not saying you have to like the man (hell I dislike people in my own party), but to reserve judgment.
@narukyuubi thats like saying carter got us into a mess so how could clinton get us out of it.Party is not black and white. there are good and bad dems, good and bad republicans. Keep in mind Bush had to deal w/ 9/11 and the war on terror, you cant ignore that massive effect on our economy,and you cant blame him for everything. Dont forget,as soon as the dems took over congress things went south.Real positive change will be from a strong Conservative that does not deviate from her/his values.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There you go again throwing out the "conservative" is what we need. It's not about that but about common sense! some of you republicans would vote for your party even it was Hitler himself as long as he claimed to be conservative. There is no room for that anymore, too many ethnic groups and lifestyles in this country to impose a way of life simply because your pastor tells you so. We're not all Christians or even believers so why impose that on anyone when the constitution forbids it.
I think change can come from anyone, Cons. or Lib. (and technically, Dem. are conservative and Rep. are liberal in the universal definition). But if what u say is true, concerning Bush 9/11 and the war, then why can't u give Obama the same benefit of the doubt (i mean you as in a general sense)? He is not Hitler or any other dictator. If ppl criticize him, criticize his policies. I may not have liked Bush's policies, but i'm not going to insult his character (T.E.A. protests). But I digress.
all u ppl who say "oh this is lies" is it not true that Obama hasn't done anything spectacular like he said he would and just try to pass health reform? Is it not true that people are dissapointed? Just because your sticking up for the most un-approoved President in History doesn't mean scream wolf
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Republicans are stupid and this video is a great example of their stupidity. They should be working hard to make America a great place to live, but no, they are making silly videos on youtube blaming all american disgrace on Obama. GREAT POLITICS. Think about it, guys.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
In regards to the Stimulus, alot of that money was put to good use. You guys talk a lot of smack but at least 100Billion of that "Pork" went towards providing school loans helping kids go to college, purchasing supplies, allowing teachers to keep their jobs and helped refurbish school buildings. Sure maybe some of it wasn't spent the best but to say it was a complete waste is severely misleading.
"In regards to the Stimulus, alot of that money was put to good use."
You don't know what you're talking about. Most of the "good use" your talking about doesent happen untill re-election year for obama and we can all suffer until then.
You were never going to "rail against obama." A quick visit to your page confirms that you are a liberal fanatic who thinks that because there is no god in your opinion, that an intellectual elite should assume that position to control peoples lives.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Oh here they go again. Funny, I was actually ready to rail against Obama but the Repubs reminded me why I voted him in to begin with. First off how does the current health care bill pose as a "government takeover?" It doesn't, it's a flat out lie. There is no government option and the Dems are not pushing to "socialize" medicine. Obama is not really having a hand in that bill as he is letting the Congress and the Senate hash it out. So to say this is "Obamacare" is pretty misleading.
I didn't like bush to say the least but obama is a big disappointment to me... He's nice with everyone who's hostile to america and neglects every friends of america... He acts like a complete idiot, sorry...
For example, we from eastern europe helped america in afghanistan, iraq, even if we didn't agree with the war and in return obama gave up missile defence system in east europe to please russia...
So it seems like you get more from americans if you're hostile to them...
@Yossarian1213 Well, if you haven't noticed, the person in the White House doesn't represent Americans. He represents himself and his friends. Americans are protesting everyday, we are tired of big government. I was not a fan of Bush and I like Obama even less. Hoopefully we will have a real president in 2012.
Jasonsadventure, don't think that my comment means I like what Obama is doing. I dislike Obama & the Democartic Socialists as much as Bush and the NeoConservatives. As far as I'm concerned, Ron Paul is the only REAL Republican.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"anyone who gets six thumbs down on a rnc post is a true legend"
Maybe we should have a special club or something. The "Truth to RNC Society"? I received 6 thumbs down on a few of my comments on this vid. We must be doing something right.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
bullshit bullshit bullshit. There was no proof of anything here, just words. Republicans may get the majority of the ignorant American who can't tell the difference between research and bullshit, but the educated America can.
same when u guys attack bush. all obama does is attack republicans 4 causing this crisis, yet he hasn't done ANYTHING to improve it. he spends more time on a senator that failed then he does about citizens.
lol, may I ask how? I do have to say he's increased unemployment rates and the only thing he' done is promote healthcare and get government more invloved in our lives. The problem isn't Americans, it's the government trying to take over what we do. The Constitution tries to avoid giving government too much power, yet Obama & other demos want government to be every aspect of our life. he even says that "wealth shud be spread 4 every1" Explain how bush was wrong, I'd like to hear that.
Hey accfan, Bush inherited a budget surplus. He turned it into the largest deficit in american history. He launched trillion dollar quagmires against nations that never attacked us and like his daddy he gave us a recession and he gave us the worst financial crisis in decades. He vowed to capture the man who headed the organization that murdered 3000 americans but failed miserably and when 911 happened he sat for 5 minutes reading a childs book after being told America was under attack
I'm talking about the budget debt moron. Bush l, Bush ll and Reagan gave us the largest deficits in history. Clinton balanced the budget and actually handed a surplus to George W Bush. As far as the national debt, it did go up under Clinton but it increased much more under Reagan, Bush l and Bush ll. Let me know if there is anything else I can do to educate your ignorant ass
TYRONE: You also have obviously never looked at deficits as a % of GDP. Carter's spending increases minus interest on our debt and defense spending were larger than Reagan's. LBJ was also quite a big-spender.
TYRONE: You can't have a surplus when the national debt goes up every year. How can there be a surplus when the national debt increases. Budget gimmicks. Even if your point was true, it was under a GOP Congress, they hold the purse strings. Check table 7.1 at
Do you understand the difference between budget deficit and national debt. I don't mind debating but honestly I draw the line at arguing with someone who has the intellectual capacity of a 10 year old
TYRONE: It sounds as if you're getting frustrated. According to the budget figures, the national debt increased every single fiscal year under Clinton.
I know the difference between the two, but you're engaging in some interesting mental gymnastics.
Now, did the national debt increase every fiscal year under Clinton or not?
Under George W Bush and GOP controlled congress and senate we saw largest budget deficit in american history and single greatest rise in our national debt.
TYRONE: I'm not disputing the fact that Bush was a big spender no matter who ran Congress (check the stats on real spending increases minus interest payments on the debt), but there was no Clinton surplus kiddo.
PS. After Jim Jeffords switched in June 2001 the Senate was 51 Dems and 49 GOP.
Ah yes so it isn't true and even if it is true it's because of budget gimmicks and if it is true and not because of budget gimmicks the it is because GOP congress held purse strings. You are a joke
TYRONE: You need to learn basic gov't. Congress holds the purse strings (any legislation raising revenue has to emanate from the House--check the Constitution), so IF there was a Clinton surplus, it would've been under a GOP Congress.
Don't you just love this poor child. He swears that there was no Clinton surplus, but just in case there was it was because of the republican congress.
Wow are you retarded? Seriously?I already said that the national debt increased under Clinton but it increased the largest under Reagan Bush l and bush ll. As far a the budget deficit Reagan=largest deficit in history. Bush l = largest deficit in history. Bush ll largest deficit in history. Clinton = Surplus. Starting to notice a pattern here?
Tyrone wins again. Seriously google: difference between national defecit and budget deficit and then you can come back on here and not sound like a complete ignoramus. Until then Tyrone will basque in the glory.
Ah yes and likewise you acknowledge that the national deficit increased less under Clinton than it did under Reagan Bush l and Bush ll and Clinton was the only one to give us a surplus whilst the others gave us record deficits. Tyrone wins again. By the way did you get a chance to google the difference between national and budget deficit? Hate for you to make an ass out of yourself again.
According to Factcheck "there was a surplus of $1.9 billion in fiscal 1999 and $86.4 billion in fiscal 2000. So any way you count it, the federal budget was balanced and the deficit was erased under Bill Clinton" Tyrone wins again
TYRONE: You'll have to check the figures on the annual national deficit per fiscal year. It increased every year under Clinton, but if you want to insist day is night, be my guest.
UTubekookdetector, you still pounding away at that losing argument. The national deficit did increase under Clinton but that increase was tiny as compared to the increases we saw under Reagan and 2 Bush's. By the way did you google the difference between national and budget deficit yet?
TYRONE: You just admitted the national debt increased every year under Clinton, we accept your concession. Now you're trying to change the subject.
Bush did just what Obama is doing, spending us into oblivion. Changing the subject however, will not make your argument correct. As I pointed out to you earlier, spending increases minus payments on the national debt:
Carter, LBJ & Kennedy all increased spending more than Reagan.
Wrong wrong wrong. Reagan increased the nation debt 7.3% and 11.2% of GDP over his two terms. George H Bush increased it 12.2%. Bill Clinton increased it 3% during his first term and actually reduced it 9.8% during his second term. George W Bush increased it 5.6% and 6.3% respectively. As for Budget deficits - Record deficits under Both George W, George H Bush and Reagan. Record surplus under Bill Clinton. Bitchslapped again kook
TYRONE: You lost the argument, the national deficit increased every single year Clinton was in office, there was no surplus. Sorry!
Your "argument" is quite curious. You're contending that in spite of the national debt increasing every single year Clinton was in office, we had a surplus. Quite amusing.
By tenure, the largest increases in gross debt relative to GDP occurred under George H.W. Bush (+13.1%), George W. Bush (+18.1%), and Ronald Reagan (+20.5%). All republicans. Nuff said ey
Under George H bush the national debt grew almost 5 trillion. Largest rise under 1 president in history. Under George H Bush budget went from a surplus to the largest deficit in history. Like I said earlier go get an education then come back and shoot your mouth off
Oh and I have Government run HC and it's a fucking joke. Besides, it's not the Government's responsibility to provide you with basic needs. Guess who's responsibility it is though. YOURS!!!
I'm in the military you brainless twit. All of the claims on this video are basic knowlege and current events. Not ancient history like libtard scum like you resort to.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
fucking stupid republicans; obama is merely an apologist for the criminal bush administration. meanwhile, the bush-appointed chief justice roberts just sold out our republic to the highest bidder.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Wow, GOP already resorting to the same fear tactics that cost them the presidential election. Doesn't surprise me that they didn't learn from their mistake.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Lies, obfuscation, and obstructionism masked as meaningful political discourse from the party of no ideas except "bring back the good ol' days of GW Bush".
No ideas? Then you're either not listening, or you just just believe the lies the Democrats feed you. Republicans have offered plenty of ideas on health care reform and other issues. In fact, back in 2003 when Bush and the Republicans warned of the problems with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and warned of an incoming housing crash, Democrats said they were being managed superbly. Of course, Republicans were right. The crash came due to Democrats refusal to accept truth.
Still no accomplishments under the Obama administration. Where is the socialized HC that Obama was talking about? What about those troops that are scheduled to come home from Iraq in April? Oh right, they're not coming back until the end of 2011. What about all those bills that he vetoed with earmarks in them? Oh right, he never vetoed them. Or how about the lobbyists he wasn't going to hire. Wait, he hired 11. PUt down the kool aid there stud.
I agree that President Obama's radical agenda is leading the country in the wrong direction. Fortunately, rather than surround himself with policy people, he chose to surround himself with political hitmen. That can only go so far and we have witnessed the incompetence of this administration as they fail again and again to implement and/or manage their policies.
It is not enough, however, for the Republicans to point out the failures of the current administration. They must lead.
@johnnydamon3 why don't we just say fuck to all politicians, not just democrats. It doesn't matter which party is in power, they always do things that pisses people off.
That's all you can say after the facts have been presented. NO suprise from the radical far left. You would kill your mother if Obama told you to wouldn't you? I bet you would. It took Obama less than a year to lose a filibuster proof Senate. All 3 Dumbs he campaigned for lost. The best you can come up with is. "we won. Get over it."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
All that plus more. As long as Sarah Palin is nowhere to be seen im gooooooooood. That woman has an IQ of a chimp and is only constitutionally qualified to be in office.
I have yet for any lib to give a legit reason why that would be a bad thing. All I've gotten is a bunch of quote miners that take shit out of context. Hillary was suppose to be PRESIDENT. SERIOUSLY
You're obviously too stupid to understand what i'm talking about. Those of us who remember the Clinton years know that Hillary called the shots. Dumbass
He was dumbass. His wife ran the administration. She even took credit for it. dumbass. Where the fuck to you think the nickname Billary came from? He is also a member of a secret society known as the the bilderberg group. So yea, he is a puppet.
The Dems have a HUGE majority, they didnt NEED ONE SINGLE Republican vote to pass anything... And they still failed...Now they CANT pass their agenda, because the American public has rejected it, and will vote out the socialists in Novmeber..
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It's tough to make changes when these Republicans work against everything that comes thru the Senate. Not to mention how badly Reps hate black people. Take responsibility Reps. You got us into this mess. U R lucky you werent hung by your presidential balls for Cheney's bullshit..
no hope no change?
isabelvalent 2 months ago
While I agree with this add, it is very presumptuous for the Republicans to tell us that they're the answer. I don't like the Republicans any better then I like the Democrats. The Republicans' agenda simply happens to flow parallel to my own. I don't agree with them, they agree with me.
AlabamaSoldier 10 months ago
My cat's breath smells like cat food.
OldCarsAreBest 1 year ago
I recall in 2008 the MSM predicted the GOP was a "dead" party. Hows that prediction worked out for you so far, morons?
AnalMart 1 year ago
The big Republican win this November should be sending the following message in no uncertain terms to Washington: Democrats, you're out. Republicans, DON'T FUCK UP.
It's not an embrace of the GOP, it's a rejection of Democrats. Republicans are on probation.
duhg599 1 year ago
The United States of AmeriCORP. Our military industrial complex is the hired assassin for the CEO elitists behind closed doors. The worst part of all: these guys claim Christ as Saviour while they crucify him afresh with every step of their march of conquest. George W. well knew the loss of 10's of 1000's of innocent lives before he lied to America to invade Iraq. The Bible's prime directive is twofold: never shed innocent blood; and be a man of your word. Our leaders are trustworthy in neither.
utopiandesign 1 year ago
if he gets reelected I'm Moving
MrEhud77 1 year ago
To get a "Reagen" you have to have a "Carter"
KsEdrummer 1 year ago 11
@KsEdrummer Lets hope that another politician similar to Reagan would be elected in 2012!
jdmifsud14 11 months ago 2
No hope, no change.
Obama is the worst president in USA history.
And I thought Jimmy Carter was bad, lol.
AcePilot101 1 year ago 24
@AcePilot101 Obama the worst president? You obviously didn't live in America during the bush years. And I rather vote jimmy carter than mcbush in any day.
joseph591 1 year ago
"Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing its idiot."
Enterprise998 1 year ago 3
well the "increase taxes" etc on healthcare will only be for the people who actually pay their bills, which isn't EVERYBODY
theaccfan 1 year ago
Republicans will not change anything, the dems. won't either, they all work for special interests.
MrDndspoon 1 year ago
Yawn. More partisan doom and gloom. I am so sick of politic-mud-slinging I could vomit.
DNC, RNC - how about doing your fucking jobs instead of trying to keep them??? THIS shit is precisely the reason people are fed up with government.
yoplaitmajor 2 years ago
I agree with most of that YOPL, this TYRONE character recently had to admit to me that the national deficit increased every year under Clinton (and then tried to change the subject to Bush--which I will admit did nothing but spend us into oblivion, Obama is following in his footsteps) and is now trying to backtrack.
We need a return to fiscal Federalism. Jim DeMint is one of those guys that could do it.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
no, it's socialists that are trying to destroy our country from within... THAT is what people are fed up with....
StrengthFromAbove83 1 year ago
@yoplaitmajor Partisan doom and gloom.. from a political party!
My God.. Duh. Are you a moron? What would you expect?
VinceP1974 1 year ago
Any "budget balancing" by Clinton was caused by highm tax revenues from a bubble he created, which proceeded to burst before he left office. He handed Bush a huge unemployment problem, an unresolved Banking mandate, and overdue checks on the economy that simply blew up at the same time courtesy of his inactions to prevent 9/11. He had the chance to kill Osama, but gave the orders "let him go."
The Community Reinvestment bust was not Bush, but Clinton's fault.
dnissen2012 2 years ago 2
All viewers of this video have to do is check the archives. I've supplied a few links to CBO data. Spending increases in REAL dollars, minus interest payments on the nat'l debt, REAL annual % change.
Eisenhower: -0.4% JFK: 4.6% LBJ: 5.7% Nixon: 2.9% Ford: 2.7% Carter 3.2% Reagan 1.9% Bush1: 2% Clinton: 1.9% Bush2: 5.6%
In addition, the national debt increased every FY under Clinton (a point TY has already conceded), there can't be a budget surplus when the nat'l debt goes up.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
For someone who doesn't know the difference between budget deficit and national deficit it hard to take kooks comments seriously. I already proved that the national debt actually decreased by 9.8% of GDP during Clintons second term while it increased substantially during George H Bush and George W. Bush. I also proved that Clinton gave us a budget surplus while both Bush's and Reagan gave us largest budget deficits in history. Tyrone wins again....and again.....and again.....and again....
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
@ty- The CBO doesn't "adjust" the numbers according to real time data. You should know this.
Bush2 did have a war to fight, so of course the numbers go up. But, Odumbo has doubled what Bush spent in only 1-year. How else can you categorize that except for reckless spending, resulting in political payoffs to unions, banks, etc?
Reagan had to rebuild the military that Carter decimated during his term. Don't forget, he also crushed the Soviets...
Charonveritas 2 years ago
@tyronebumblebee The GOP Congress forced budget disciple on Clinton.
Plus the phantom Dot-Com bubble caused unexpected tax revenue to flood into the Federal Govt.
At least know what the fuck what you're talking about, hack.
VinceP1974 1 year ago
Hey guido, stop listening to Rush limpdick. From 2001-2006 when we had record deficits under a republican congress and a republican president. Not to mention trillion dollar quagmires that our grandkids will be paying for.
tyronebumblebee 1 year ago
Reagan = massive deficits, high unemployment. Bush l =massive deficits, high unemployment. Clinton, budget surplus and low unemployment. Bush ll = massive deficits and high unemployment. Starting to notice a pattern here guido?
tyronebumblebee 1 year ago
80's Liberal Dem Congress + Consv Pres
90s Conservative GOP Congress + Triangulating Dem. Pres
00s Liberal GOP Congress + Moderate GOP Pres
10s Far Leftist Dem Congress + Far Leftist Dem President
Yes, I spot the trend... when the Conservatives hold the power in Congress the GOP and there's a President who doesn't mind coopting their ideas that things go well.
But when Conservatives are not in Congress Leadership, the spigots open.
VinceP1974 1 year ago
2001-2006 A conservative president and GOP controlled congress 2001-2006. Biggest defict in American history, high unemployment. Greatest economic growth in last 50 years - JFK, Johnson and Clinton. Lowest economic growth in last 50 years Bush l and Bush ll. Whoops another pattern
tyronebumblebee 1 year ago
@tyronebumblebee ......"Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing its idiot." LMAO
Enterprise998 1 year ago 3
People can check the post I made 4 down. The first utilizes CBO data concerning annual spending increases from Eisenhower to Bush43.
The second focuses on national debt figures (table 7.1) and that debt increased every year Clinton was President.
Tyrone is not citing any actual data, he's making it up as he goes along.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
It's a fact that Clinton had a budget surplus according to the congressional budget office and verified by factcheck. Don't know how much more proof you need. Still confused about the difference between national and budget deficit ey? Honestly at this point you have been discredited and exposed as an ignoramus
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
The dump I took this morning has more meaning and as much thought as this "advertisement" It's like they forgot that the GOP *also* voted for the stimulus, and that it was their previous (fool) President Bush that this whole crap-storm started
ReadmanJ 2 years ago
TYRONE is pulling stats out of his rear. Anyone who looks at the CBO figues knows better.
cato-at-liberty . org/2009/12/19/george-w-bush-biggest-spender-since-lbj/
There was no Clinton surplus the national debt went from 5.478 trillion in FY98 to 5.769 trillion in FY01.
gpoaccess . gov/usbudget/fy10/pdf/hist . pdf (table 7.1)
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
UTubekookdetector, I have a serious question I need to ask you. Are you retarded. You continue to argue with me even though you clearly do not know the difference between budget deficit and national deficit. Clinton did indeed hand over a budget surplus to George W. Bush and my source was factcheck. As for the national deficit - As I said earlier Clinton actually reduced it by 9.8% of GDP in his second term. Owned again bitch
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
There was a surplus of $1.9 billion in fiscal 1999 and $86.4 billion in fiscal 2000 So any way you count it, the federal budget was balanced and the deficit was erased
Factcheck citing statistics form the
congressional budget office Historical Budget Data
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
No the budget was never truly balanced. They still had to suck the Social Security taxes to cover a deficit.
VinceP1974 1 year ago 2
Ah yes guido when republicans fuck up it's because they're too liberal, Just about covered all your bases ey? By the way Factcheck (Using statistics from nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office) concluded that " there was a surplus of $1.9 billion in fiscal 1999 and $86.4 billion in fiscal 2000. So any way you count it, the federal budget was balanced and the deficit was erased"
tyronebumblebee 1 year ago
Yo vinnie did you see republican consultant Todd Harris on tv a few weeks ago. Asked what republicans have done for america in the last 20 years he couldn't come up with one thing. Nuff said ey?
tyronebumblebee 1 year ago
This is the worst piece of bullshit partisan attacks from the RNC in quite sometime. Republicans are sorely mistaken if they think that most Independent Americans are going to buy their argument. Unfortunately political parties are organisms whose sole purpose is survival. And that survival comes before the survival of the nation.
ulstermandc 2 years ago
Does everyone have to go out against the other Partisan party? We're allon the same team overall, we have different views but does that mean videos like this one need to made? And if so why don't the people who are the root of this video "call out" the president that they're accusing? I'm not sure who I support, and that probably is because i'm an "ignoramus".What do the republicans expect to get done if win, and if they do what'll happen if the change they promise is a rerun from an old prune?
ontherightedge 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fact: Under George W Bush and a GOP controlled congress we saw largest budget deficit in american history and we also single greatest rise ever of our national debt.
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
Later mental midget. Isn't it way past your bedtime
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
I do accept your concession TYRONE.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Concession? LOL Boredom. Someone who doesn't know the difference between national deficit and budget deficit isn't much of a challenge.
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
Its sad to me that people even listen to this and believe it. Im dumbfounded how easy it is to brainwash people in this nation. Just look at the Drug War and the damage it has caused, yet 44% of Americans are scared into thinking its a good thing. Its that minority that has let it happen year after year after year!
Very sad, we have a nation full of Sheeple!
ReformKyCannabis 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I like how these retards don't explain or attempt to justify anything they assert.
mmmzig 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i know. isn't it cool? that's because it takes an intellect and sound reasoning to post a justification.
clicking "thumbs down" doesn't require the right-wing extremist to think or be reasonable or anything.
jasonsadventure 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
of course we are this way now, thanks to mr bush and the republicans of "no and no and more no, they,re the one,s blocking the progress of our present president, they got their chance the past 8 years and look the way we are now. ....no thanks republicans
ldsrank 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
is it just me...or do people not remember that Bush was the one that first started giving out Billions of Dollars out to Wallstreet.
Obama right now is doing damage control & actually doing something....working on something. this president is actually proactive, unlike the last one.
crzymandaringrl 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so what exactly do you republicans do these days? as far as i can tell, your party is unwilling and unable to deal with the issues of our day. but maybe you've convinced your constituents that legislators shouldn't legislate? now that your "conservative" chief justice has sold our country to the highest bidder, maybe you think your corporate masters prefer you remain dormant, i don't know. curse your stupid jingoist asses & the bankers you rode in on!
5ken7 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Republicans hate big government? As far as I can tell, they increased the size of governemnt for 8 straight years. Oh, but because they didn't pay for it, it's ok, as long as our taxes dont go up! We don't need to worry about a deficit of 13 trillion. 9/11 did no warrant the war in Iraq, or really, a war of occupation in Afganistan. And oh yeah, Bush passed a a 700 billion dollar medicare bill. And guess what. All these things were unfunded. Gratz republicans.
Sacktacular 2 years ago
Go Republicans!
RomoAbel 2 years ago
Yeah that's exactly what we need, republicans please GO!
beanbomb 2 years ago
Heee....Yaahhh! Hold on to them reins and Crack that whip!
Pres.... Is covering it up! The people dont want a 'union speech' on how great some of use have it!
Gop rebuttial was the chorus......
MrMindfucker 2 years ago
Ok, I was wondering if anyone who properly explain to me the health care reform without adding personal opinions or swearing or biased views. Just the facts, ALL the facts. I have yet to receive an answer from someone. Please, someone just explain that to me, because from what I understand, I don't like it (and I'm a Dem).
narukyuubi 2 years ago
First of all, look at it in the eyes of the doctors. They are going to be paid basically the same as a school teacher, and doctors have to go through 12 years of schooling, 4 years of college, 4 med school, 4 residency, so you can understand whyd they be pissed. Becuz of this, doctors will most likely go on strike, meaning that no one anywhere will get any form of treatment unless they know of someone.
CptCool2 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"Doctors being paid the same salary as teachers" makes it sound like an insult to teachers. I agree that the more educated should earn more, that I wouldn't want to budge on. I do see a problem with is figuring out why someone has to pay thousands of dollars for a visit to a doctor or why medicine has such a high price and how the Insurance companies abuse the lack of laws to drop patients so they don't have to pay for procedures, that's where reform should come in.
beanbomb 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The only thing that this shows one year into his presidency is just how bad the Republicans left the country on their way out. Your way is the way of fear and lies to get the less educated on your side. I know this because I work with Republicans who spout the same uninformed statements about the president that take only seconds to search for and disprove. Yours is the party of old and there is no room in this country for your insensitivity and archaic beliefs.
beanbomb 2 years ago
@beanbomb LOL you're a scared dem w/o a life preserver on a sinking dem ship. Face it, the liberals' days are numbered. America has woken up, and realized conservative values are what we need. (Bush regretfully did not stick to those values). Brown and the 2 governorships that went D to R are the canaries in the mine. CHANGE is coming!!! 2010/2012
WaitFor2012 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Funny thing is I'm not a Democrat but I'm sure as hell not a Republican. How exactly is it that we "need conservative values"? you mean to say you want to impose laws based on your religious views? That we need to go back to leadership who thinks as if the year is still 1950? If anyone's days are numbered are all the aging republicans who want to rule with one hand on the bible and the other in a stack of money from big corporations. Hypocrisy at its best!
beanbomb 2 years ago
But...how can Republicans bring change we need when they were the ones who put us into this mess in the first place?
narukyuubi 2 years ago
@narukyuubi, the republicans also had help in bringing down this country from democrats, too; the republicans did not have a filibuster proof senate, narukyuubi.
cartmanfan0316 2 years ago
@cartmanfan0316 true. I know that the democrats had a majority in 2006 and even earlier, there were few who went along with Bush (he had to or else he would get little done). I get why were are frustrated, why Obama is being bashed, but it annoys me when he takes the blame. It's not his fault. Sure he hasn't done enough and has a long way to go before our economy improves. And it isn't just Republicans who annoy me but Democrats do too. Stop pointing fingers and do something about it.
narukyuubi 2 years ago
You make a good point (though I should have been clear and said the executive branch). I am sorry about that. But, why don't people reserve their opinions until after his term is done. A year is not enough to fix the damage of a messed up economy. Great Depression, from what I understand, was saved mostly because of WWII...and that took years. I'm not saying you have to like the man (hell I dislike people in my own party), but to reserve judgment.
Sorry again for not being clear, cartmanfan0316.
narukyuubi 2 years ago
@narukyuubi thats like saying carter got us into a mess so how could clinton get us out of it.Party is not black and white. there are good and bad dems, good and bad republicans. Keep in mind Bush had to deal w/ 9/11 and the war on terror, you cant ignore that massive effect on our economy,and you cant blame him for everything. Dont forget,as soon as the dems took over congress things went south.Real positive change will be from a strong Conservative that does not deviate from her/his values.
WaitFor2012 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There you go again throwing out the "conservative" is what we need. It's not about that but about common sense! some of you republicans would vote for your party even it was Hitler himself as long as he claimed to be conservative. There is no room for that anymore, too many ethnic groups and lifestyles in this country to impose a way of life simply because your pastor tells you so. We're not all Christians or even believers so why impose that on anyone when the constitution forbids it.
beanbomb 2 years ago
I think change can come from anyone, Cons. or Lib. (and technically, Dem. are conservative and Rep. are liberal in the universal definition). But if what u say is true, concerning Bush 9/11 and the war, then why can't u give Obama the same benefit of the doubt (i mean you as in a general sense)? He is not Hitler or any other dictator. If ppl criticize him, criticize his policies. I may not have liked Bush's policies, but i'm not going to insult his character (T.E.A. protests). But I digress.
narukyuubi 2 years ago
hehe the americans wanting change is just one old lady
zozolog12 2 years ago
Wait I am confused, how is government taking over Health Care? Obama wants to cut medicare? Did the Republicans try to get rid of Medicare?
Wait what?
They may score political points by lying, but they will lose their souls in the process.
TheSixCents 2 years ago
Thats healthcare reform. Govt. run healthcare
halftwin17 2 years ago
Your on the GOP's Youtube page what did you expect, them to praise Obama. If you want to see that go watch CNN..
yankeesarethebest224 2 years ago
or BSNBC
WaitFor2012 2 years ago
all u ppl who say "oh this is lies" is it not true that Obama hasn't done anything spectacular like he said he would and just try to pass health reform? Is it not true that people are dissapointed? Just because your sticking up for the most un-approoved President in History doesn't mean scream wolf
theaccfan 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Republicans are stupid and this video is a great example of their stupidity. They should be working hard to make America a great place to live, but no, they are making silly videos on youtube blaming all american disgrace on Obama. GREAT POLITICS. Think about it, guys.
takearunatthesun 2 years ago
And you're sitting at home just defending yourself yet they state no facts they just say "oh this is why this is happening, bla bla bla"
theaccfan 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In regards to the Stimulus, alot of that money was put to good use. You guys talk a lot of smack but at least 100Billion of that "Pork" went towards providing school loans helping kids go to college, purchasing supplies, allowing teachers to keep their jobs and helped refurbish school buildings. Sure maybe some of it wasn't spent the best but to say it was a complete waste is severely misleading.
AlizarinRipley 2 years ago
"In regards to the Stimulus, alot of that money was put to good use."
You don't know what you're talking about. Most of the "good use" your talking about doesent happen untill re-election year for obama and we can all suffer until then.
You were never going to "rail against obama." A quick visit to your page confirms that you are a liberal fanatic who thinks that because there is no god in your opinion, that an intellectual elite should assume that position to control peoples lives.
Vlaxitov 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh here they go again. Funny, I was actually ready to rail against Obama but the Repubs reminded me why I voted him in to begin with. First off how does the current health care bill pose as a "government takeover?" It doesn't, it's a flat out lie. There is no government option and the Dems are not pushing to "socialize" medicine. Obama is not really having a hand in that bill as he is letting the Congress and the Senate hash it out. So to say this is "Obamacare" is pretty misleading.
AlizarinRipley 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hahaha! rnc followers gave me thumbs down for telling rnc to let us think for ourselves. Priceless.
GrumpyShow 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
propaganda olé !
heyruhn 2 years ago
I didn't like bush to say the least but obama is a big disappointment to me... He's nice with everyone who's hostile to america and neglects every friends of america... He acts like a complete idiot, sorry...
For example, we from eastern europe helped america in afghanistan, iraq, even if we didn't agree with the war and in return obama gave up missile defence system in east europe to please russia...
So it seems like you get more from americans if you're hostile to them...
Yossarian1213 2 years ago 2
@Yossarian1213 Well, if you haven't noticed, the person in the White House doesn't represent Americans. He represents himself and his friends. Americans are protesting everyday, we are tired of big government. I was not a fan of Bush and I like Obama even less. Hoopefully we will have a real president in 2012.
TwiztedAnimator 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why do right-wing extremist think
- corporations are people
- freedom is for the rich, white & straight
- patriotism is hate & bigotry
- money is speech
- guns are a right
- health care's a privileged and
- dumb is a virtue?
jasonsadventure 2 years ago
@jasonsadventure LMAO! You really have got to get your head out of Obama's commie ass. Wake up pal, smell the communism.
TwiztedAnimator 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Republicans are as interested in Liberty & the Constitution, the way Barney Frank is as interested in women.
cartmanfan0316 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
damn, cartmanfan0316. anyone who gets six thumbs down on a rnc post is a true legend of wit and intellect.
i'll beat yah next time!
jasonsadventure 2 years ago
Jasonsadventure, don't think that my comment means I like what Obama is doing. I dislike Obama & the Democartic Socialists as much as Bush and the NeoConservatives. As far as I'm concerned, Ron Paul is the only REAL Republican.
cartmanfan0316 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"anyone who gets six thumbs down on a rnc post is a true legend"
Maybe we should have a special club or something. The "Truth to RNC Society"? I received 6 thumbs down on a few of my comments on this vid. We must be doing something right.
mistergarth 2 years ago
Your party is breaking all records for losing it's political ass....Please! Keep doing what you as a party are doing...
BuschDrinker1 2 years ago
yeah baby! i'm now tied for the lead. six thumbs down. cartmanfan0316 eat my dust.
jasonsadventure 2 years ago
i just took away your lead. i got six. damn those right wing extremist hate the truth.
jasonsadventure 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bullshit bullshit bullshit. There was no proof of anything here, just words. Republicans may get the majority of the ignorant American who can't tell the difference between research and bullshit, but the educated America can.
itbeshannonfoo 2 years ago
same when u guys attack bush. all obama does is attack republicans 4 causing this crisis, yet he hasn't done ANYTHING to improve it. he spends more time on a senator that failed then he does about citizens.
theaccfan 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Good job obama - a million times better than bush
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
lol, may I ask how? I do have to say he's increased unemployment rates and the only thing he' done is promote healthcare and get government more invloved in our lives. The problem isn't Americans, it's the government trying to take over what we do. The Constitution tries to avoid giving government too much power, yet Obama & other demos want government to be every aspect of our life. he even says that "wealth shud be spread 4 every1" Explain how bush was wrong, I'd like to hear that.
theaccfan 2 years ago 2
Good posts.
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
Hey accfan, Bush inherited a budget surplus. He turned it into the largest deficit in american history. He launched trillion dollar quagmires against nations that never attacked us and like his daddy he gave us a recession and he gave us the worst financial crisis in decades. He vowed to capture the man who headed the organization that murdered 3000 americans but failed miserably and when 911 happened he sat for 5 minutes reading a childs book after being told America was under attack
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
As I said, Obama - a million time better than Bush
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: Let me amend your statement. "Obama -- one million times better than Bush at growing government and spending (and that's saying something)."
PS the national debt went up every Fiscal Year Clinton was in office, there was no such surplus. Sorry!
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
I'm talking about the budget debt moron. Bush l, Bush ll and Reagan gave us the largest deficits in history. Clinton balanced the budget and actually handed a surplus to George W Bush. As far as the national debt, it did go up under Clinton but it increased much more under Reagan, Bush l and Bush ll. Let me know if there is anything else I can do to educate your ignorant ass
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: You also have obviously never looked at deficits as a % of GDP. Carter's spending increases minus interest on our debt and defense spending were larger than Reagan's. LBJ was also quite a big-spender.
cato-at-liberty . org/2009/12/19/george-w-bush-biggest-spender-since-lbj/
Check your facts next time kid.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Go educate yourself and come back later. You're embarrassing
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
Do you know the difference between budget deficit and national deficit? This is like arguing with a 9 year old
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: You can't have a surplus when the national debt goes up every year. How can there be a surplus when the national debt increases. Budget gimmicks. Even if your point was true, it was under a GOP Congress, they hold the purse strings. Check table 7.1 at
gpoaccess . gov/usbudget/fy10/pdf/hist . pdf
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Do you understand the difference between budget deficit and national debt. I don't mind debating but honestly I draw the line at arguing with someone who has the intellectual capacity of a 10 year old
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: It sounds as if you're getting frustrated. According to the budget figures, the national debt increased every single fiscal year under Clinton.
I know the difference between the two, but you're engaging in some interesting mental gymnastics.
Now, did the national debt increase every fiscal year under Clinton or not?
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
2000 - 2006 Republican president, GOP majority in congress and senate. Budget deficit ballooned to largest in history. Nuff said ey?
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
kook, you are right. Arguing with a mental midget is frustrating
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
Under George W Bush and GOP controlled congress and senate we saw largest budget deficit in american history and single greatest rise in our national debt.
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: I'm not disputing the fact that Bush was a big spender no matter who ran Congress (check the stats on real spending increases minus interest payments on the debt), but there was no Clinton surplus kiddo.
PS. After Jim Jeffords switched in June 2001 the Senate was 51 Dems and 49 GOP.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Ah yes so it was the republican congress 2000-2006 that gave us the largest deficit in Amercan history. Cheers
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
Ah yes so it isn't true and even if it is true it's because of budget gimmicks and if it is true and not because of budget gimmicks the it is because GOP congress held purse strings. You are a joke
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: You need to learn basic gov't. Congress holds the purse strings (any legislation raising revenue has to emanate from the House--check the Constitution), so IF there was a Clinton surplus, it would've been under a GOP Congress.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Don't you just love this poor child. He swears that there was no Clinton surplus, but just in case there was it was because of the republican congress.
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: Your comments keep geting marked as spam by YT. You're repeating yourself, you're cutting and pasting.
My points stand: There was no Clinton surplus (the nat'l debt increased every year) and the GOP controlled Congress for Clinton's last 6 years.
The Senate was 51 Dems 49 GOP after Jim Jeffords switched in June 2001. Sorry! I'll be back on Sunday to kick you around more.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Wow are you retarded? Seriously?I already said that the national debt increased under Clinton but it increased the largest under Reagan Bush l and bush ll. As far a the budget deficit Reagan=largest deficit in history. Bush l = largest deficit in history. Bush ll largest deficit in history. Clinton = Surplus. Starting to notice a pattern here?
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
Tyrone wins again. Seriously google: difference between national defecit and budget deficit and then you can come back on here and not sound like a complete ignoramus. Until then Tyrone will basque in the glory.
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: It's BASK, not BASQUE. I will try to remember you're the educated one here.
Glad to see you've admitted the national debt increased every fiscal year under Clinton, ergo there was no surplus.
The only trend I'm noticing is your bad grammar and talking points. We've refuted your surplus rag at
professor_enigma . webs . com/youtubekooks . htm#511839734
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Ah yes and likewise you acknowledge that the national deficit increased less under Clinton than it did under Reagan Bush l and Bush ll and Clinton was the only one to give us a surplus whilst the others gave us record deficits. Tyrone wins again. By the way did you get a chance to google the difference between national and budget deficit? Hate for you to make an ass out of yourself again.
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: We do accept your concession, now go "bask" in your own ignorance.
Thank you for admitting that growing government and expanding its reach (as Bush did) doesn't work.
craigsteiner . us/articles/16
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
According to Factcheck "there was a surplus of $1.9 billion in fiscal 1999 and $86.4 billion in fiscal 2000. So any way you count it, the federal budget was balanced and the deficit was erased under Bill Clinton" Tyrone wins again
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: You'll have to check the figures on the annual national deficit per fiscal year. It increased every year under Clinton, but if you want to insist day is night, be my guest.
I accept your concession.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
UTubekookdetector, you still pounding away at that losing argument. The national deficit did increase under Clinton but that increase was tiny as compared to the increases we saw under Reagan and 2 Bush's. By the way did you google the difference between national and budget deficit yet?
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: You just admitted the national debt increased every year under Clinton, we accept your concession. Now you're trying to change the subject.
Bush did just what Obama is doing, spending us into oblivion. Changing the subject however, will not make your argument correct. As I pointed out to you earlier, spending increases minus payments on the national debt:
Carter, LBJ & Kennedy all increased spending more than Reagan.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Wrong wrong wrong. Reagan increased the nation debt 7.3% and 11.2% of GDP over his two terms. George H Bush increased it 12.2%. Bill Clinton increased it 3% during his first term and actually reduced it 9.8% during his second term. George W Bush increased it 5.6% and 6.3% respectively. As for Budget deficits - Record deficits under Both George W, George H Bush and Reagan. Record surplus under Bill Clinton. Bitchslapped again kook
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
Learn the difference between nation debt and budget debt and next time you won't make an ass out of yourself
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
TYRONE: You lost the argument, the national deficit increased every single year Clinton was in office, there was no surplus. Sorry!
Your "argument" is quite curious. You're contending that in spite of the national debt increasing every single year Clinton was in office, we had a surplus. Quite amusing.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Ok moron, do you know the difference between budget deficit and national deficit?
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
By tenure, the largest increases in gross debt relative to GDP occurred under George H.W. Bush (+13.1%), George W. Bush (+18.1%), and Ronald Reagan (+20.5%). All republicans. Nuff said ey
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
Spending increases in real dollars, minus interest payments on the nat'l debt, real annual % change.
Eisenhower: -0.4% JFK: 4.6% LBJ: 5.7% Nixon: 2.9% Ford: 2.7% Carter 3.2% Reagan 1.9% Bush1: 2% Clinton: 1.9% Bush2: 5.6%
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you know the difference between budget deficit and national deficit. Clearly you do not. Ignorant Ignorant Ignorant
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
Under George H bush the national debt grew almost 5 trillion. Largest rise under 1 president in history. Under George H Bush budget went from a surplus to the largest deficit in history. Like I said earlier go get an education then come back and shoot your mouth off
tyronebumblebee 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WOW! Good job RNC. None of everything you've stated EXISTS. And i ask anyone to prove it!
We could speculate all day and theorize conspiracies but, what is factual and true today that this video suggests?
NOTHING
Keep it up republicans... The more you continue to not WORK the more this country will fail. Outstanding.
VAR1UM 2 years ago
Another desparate dumb. 787 B stimulus bill did happen, HC was going to pass in August. I didn't. Cap and Tax is failing. Thank God.
Do you like waiting in lobbies for hours?
Do you like being on hold for 30 minutes to an hour?
Are you ok with waiting 2 - 3 months for major surgery if needed?
Reid and Pelosi do have low rates.
If you answered no to any of these questions, you're opposed to HC.
Dumbs are retiring.
The Democratic party is dying man. Thank the good lord for that.
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What the f___?
Like i said. Facts? You aint got'em!
VAR1UM 2 years ago
Name one thing on my post (with evidence) that is not true.
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
How can one produce evidence for something you made up? Its impossible. Its harder to disprove a Lie than Fact my friend.
VAR1UM 2 years ago
That's what I thought. YOu're saying that 787B stimulus never happened?
Cap and Tax was never negotiated?
Republicans never won those elections?
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
Oh and I have Government run HC and it's a fucking joke. Besides, it's not the Government's responsibility to provide you with basic needs. Guess who's responsibility it is though. YOURS!!!
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Really? what's this "government run HC" you have already, since you are so responsible to begin with?
I have a sneaking suspicion you are full of shit or full blown retarded and have no idea what you're saying or why.
peace
VAR1UM 2 years ago
I'm in the military you brainless twit. All of the claims on this video are basic knowlege and current events. Not ancient history like libtard scum like you resort to.
jeremyoyer 2 years ago 5
Thanks for pointing out this vid to me Jeremy.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
@UTubekookdetector,
Sure thing.
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fucking stupid republicans; obama is merely an apologist for the criminal bush administration. meanwhile, the bush-appointed chief justice roberts just sold out our republic to the highest bidder.
5ken7 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow, GOP already resorting to the same fear tactics that cost them the presidential election. Doesn't surprise me that they didn't learn from their mistake.
brandonmiletta 2 years ago
@mistergarth "It'll take some radicalism to do that."
And you think the American people will stand by and allow leftist radicalism??? LMAO... Sit back and watch the show in November. :)
We're taking America back.
bucs2921 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"American people will stand by and allow leftist radicalism?"
That's what they thought they were voting for. They got a namby-pamby capitulationist pseudo-Democrat.
mistergarth 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Lies, obfuscation, and obstructionism masked as meaningful political discourse from the party of no ideas except "bring back the good ol' days of GW Bush".
mistergarth 2 years ago
@mistergarth
No ideas? Then you're either not listening, or you just just believe the lies the Democrats feed you. Republicans have offered plenty of ideas on health care reform and other issues. In fact, back in 2003 when Bush and the Republicans warned of the problems with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and warned of an incoming housing crash, Democrats said they were being managed superbly. Of course, Republicans were right. The crash came due to Democrats refusal to accept truth.
ButterflyDragon9 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"Republicans have offered plenty of ideas"
"NO!" is not an idea.
"It's all Obama's fault" is not an idea.
"It's all the Democrats' fault" is not an idea.
Endlessly parroting the same lies is not a substitute for ideas.
mistergarth 2 years ago
Still no accomplishments under the Obama administration. Where is the socialized HC that Obama was talking about? What about those troops that are scheduled to come home from Iraq in April? Oh right, they're not coming back until the end of 2011. What about all those bills that he vetoed with earmarks in them? Oh right, he never vetoed them. Or how about the lobbyists he wasn't going to hire. Wait, he hired 11. PUt down the kool aid there stud.
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
I agree that President Obama's radical agenda is leading the country in the wrong direction. Fortunately, rather than surround himself with policy people, he chose to surround himself with political hitmen. That can only go so far and we have witnessed the incompetence of this administration as they fail again and again to implement and/or manage their policies.
It is not enough, however, for the Republicans to point out the failures of the current administration. They must lead.
Beeleavit08 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This video is silly. Fuck republicans.
We won. get over it.
Alansr10 2 years ago
Fuck democrats man your screwing everything up. Making it worse.
johnnydamon3 2 years ago 2
@johnnydamon3 why don't we just say fuck to all politicians, not just democrats. It doesn't matter which party is in power, they always do things that pisses people off.
narukyuubi 2 years ago
That's all you can say after the facts have been presented. NO suprise from the radical far left. You would kill your mother if Obama told you to wouldn't you? I bet you would. It took Obama less than a year to lose a filibuster proof Senate. All 3 Dumbs he campaigned for lost. The best you can come up with is. "we won. Get over it."
NICE
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
All that plus more. As long as Sarah Palin is nowhere to be seen im gooooooooood. That woman has an IQ of a chimp and is only constitutionally qualified to be in office.
Alansr10 2 years ago
Hey that's one more credential than Obama has. It's perfectly normal to hate independent women. Let's see who the dumbums have.
Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Kristen Gillibrand, Madonna, Pamela Anderson, Michelle Obama...
What fine examples of women don't you think?
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol why you comparing those women? pamela anderson? get the fuck out of here.... Palin was supposed to be the VICE PRESIDENT. seriously
Alansr10 2 years ago
I have yet for any lib to give a legit reason why that would be a bad thing. All I've gotten is a bunch of quote miners that take shit out of context. Hillary was suppose to be PRESIDENT. SERIOUSLY
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
As a matter of fact, she was president between 1993 and 2001. Oh yea, I remember old Billary.
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thats not Hillary. Hillary was never president. USA has never had a female president dumbass
Alansr10 2 years ago
You're obviously too stupid to understand what i'm talking about. Those of us who remember the Clinton years know that Hillary called the shots. Dumbass
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Clinton was no puppet. dumbass
Alansr10 2 years ago
He was dumbass. His wife ran the administration. She even took credit for it. dumbass. Where the fuck to you think the nickname Billary came from? He is also a member of a secret society known as the the bilderberg group. So yea, he is a puppet.
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
But he was the president. Not hillary. so stfu. nuff said.
Alansr10 2 years ago
Officially yes. Unofficialy no. nuff said.
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
nepenthe077 - youre pretty dumb..
The Dems have a HUGE majority, they didnt NEED ONE SINGLE Republican vote to pass anything... And they still failed...Now they CANT pass their agenda, because the American public has rejected it, and will vote out the socialists in Novmeber..
Bye bye, lefties.
bucs2921 2 years ago 2
HELL YEA! BY BY leftist scum lovers!
RebelStangII 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's tough to make changes when these Republicans work against everything that comes thru the Senate. Not to mention how badly Reps hate black people. Take responsibility Reps. You got us into this mess. U R lucky you werent hung by your presidential balls for Cheney's bullshit..
nepenthe077 2 years ago
Can't libs make a proper counter-point without playing the race card?
Christianrocker1990 2 years ago 4