Added: 3 years ago
From: lufffy
Views: 7,995,798
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5,158)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hulk 03 was too slow got really boring. You know it's possible to have character development without it being slow and boring. 03 hulk was terrible not saying that 08 was better tho. Hulk is a cool character which 03 showed it but it was just too slow.

  • @Hamburgan Nothing can stop hulk? How about phoenix? Or doctor doom or ghost rider or the human torch with his super nova? They are all more powerful.

  • Just watched this on itv1

  • Ss3 Goku Vs Hulk.. We All Know Who Would Win..

  • the first was the best

  • Maybe you don't like it, but i loved the 2008 Hulk. You can't put in the same side a movie that is about the beggining of Hulk and one about after bruce banner run away from the USA seeking for a cure.

    HULK is the best!

  • I Love 2003 movie.2008 it's a bullshit

  • 2003 more bad ass action

  • the difference is that the first 1 actually looks realistic.

  • idk which is better

    i fap to both movies soo

  • @cassyykillszombies perv :P

  • 2003 hulk looked more comic like but lacked story, 2008 looked more "badass" and was overall a better movie.

  • @nic95 "Lacked story".... Are you serious?

  • I like The Incredible Hulk 2008 better, because of Edward Norton

  • I like the way the 2008 Hulk looks better but I like the 2003 movie better.

  • @USAShooting27 exactly the 2008 one really set the story

  • lou is the biggest hulk at of all

  • he more like a grasshoper on steroids!!!

  • NIGGA CAN JUMP!! I SWEAR! :o

  • Comment removed

  • that was the tv series lonly man theme at the end :) yay

  • hulk 2003 looks more like Shrek than hulk

  • man i wish i can jump like that, cuz then i can say fuck cars and gas!!

  • in the comics hulk was 9ft in 2003 this bitch was 15ft tsll

  • F.C.P player wins

  • why was 2003 Hulk so fucking tall??

  • @Mrsonicdude100 hes supposed to be tall. but why is 2008 hulk so small ?

  • @IMAHOE321 i thought he was supposed to be like only a foot taller than his orginal form not 7 feet taller

  • @Mrsonicdude100 you know what good about this hulk. ?? everytime he gets mad he grows taller. and he can jump high. your right they made the 2008 hulk right a foot long but its not as good as the 2003 hulk.

  • @IMAHOE321 very true.

  • The 2003 Hulk was a bit too strong and too big.

  • skream brought me here...wtf?

  • Hulk 2003 Better looking Hulk they went backwards with that in 2008 but Norton was better than bana so if norton was in the first this conversation would be null and void

  • the 2003 hulk reacts like a mad man on crack when he gets angry haha

  • Still prefer Ang Lees's Hulk. Yea, lots of melodrama b ut you're talking about a guy who is more powerful the angrier he gets. Also he looks cartoony but its a guy who was exposed to Gamma radiation and gets green and strong from it. So yea.

    Also, if you're gonna do a realistic Hulk then do the new Avengers version where the Hulk is a mass murderer and everytime he transforms, people's lives in danger. But that Norton movie had balls to do that so I fail to see a point in it existing.

  • @ruekurei88 Finally someone with some sense.

    There HAS to be drama behind the Hulk's story.

    People don't realize that his daddy issues play a HUUUGE role in his fight with his inner anger monkey. It's straight from the comics. His dad was an abusive prick which contributed to all his repressed rage. These other ignorant tards just want to see Hulk smash and don't wanna know why.

    Give me a good story with a little action any day over mindless action and no character dev.

  • Sucks Ed Norton wont be playing the Hulk in the Avengers movie :/

  • why did hulk faint when he started to go out of the atmosphere? i thought he could hold his breathe for long periods of time in space and water

  • ROFLMFAO I swear When hulk jumps he looks funny when he flies 20 miles. Thumbs up!

  • Edward Norton did a fuckin nice job in 'Incredible Hulk'

    He cleaned up all the shits that Hulk 2003 had created.

  • @Special1Mourinho

    And what shit was that exactly.

    Actual character development which 2008 Hulk lacked...?

    Story and conflict....?

    A stronger Hulk? Yeah I said it, 2008 Hulk barely tossed a few cars, 2003 Hulk chucked tanks all over the place.

    The only....ONLY argument you could possibly pose is the look of the Hulk himself, which is done by the same exact fuckin' company.

  • @MrBurgundy76 In the comics the hulk can leap whole cities and continents.  Hell, he once almost leaped out if the earths atmosphere.

  • @thekoas54 Why do you feel it was exagerrated? In the comics the hulk has done things far beyond what he's done in either of the movies.

  • HULK is everything!

    In front of HULK they are nothing!

    HULK could destroy the whole UNIVERSE!

    Nothing can stop HULK there is no power to stop him nothing!

  • 2:02 I bet Hulk loves Rock music

  • The Hulk 2003 Hulk better than the second part

  • @trimefrt they both were great for their year, only thing that killed 2003 hulk was the constant backstories but it makes for an excellent saturday night movie on ur tele.

  • Hulk 03 looked terrible. Seemed like a toy to me, too green and the animations weren't graft

  • check out my channel for incredible hulk 2008 movie clips

  • Lol he looks like jay cutler

  • 1:33 Hulk: Woah woah WOAH WOAH-YEAH!

  • Even though I prefer The Incredible Hulk 2008 and still think Hulk 2003 is underrated.

  • my only beef with the 03 one was he wasent angry enough as the hulk my experience of the hulk growing up was that fact at how angry he got that was the hulk the 03 didnt really show that well in my opinon but the 08 one did

  • i believe hulk 03 was to exagggerated

  • @thekoas54

    You obviously know nothing about the comic Hulk then.

    He's called the World-Breaker for a good reason.

  • The Abomination vs Thor???PLEASE type in GREEN LANTERN THE ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY it is the true story of how GEORGE LUCAS sent off duty CIA agwents to threaten my Mother witgh guns PLEASE check it out thanks

  • It seems like everybody choose action than good quality dialogue *sigh* hulk 03 was great, it went deep into Bruce banners childhood and showed how insane his father is, if that wasn't good then idk what has this world come to....

  • Its seems like everybody just chooses action rather than goof quality dialogue *sigh* hulk 03 had good dialogue and even went deep into Bruce banners childhood if you think thats not good then idk what this world has come to.

  • aguien por favor en espanish jaa

  • I hated it, the Ed Norton one has so many cool Easter eggs related to THE AVENGERS , the Leader , maybe even DOC SAMPSON.. , THE ABOMINATION tied in with the consultant one shot , ANG LEE ruined it some of it did look awesome but it's ultimately rubbish...., thank god Feige and those guys got it going with Iron Man 2 and the tie ins all working together

  • @DROTTOHARRIS

    Tying stuff in to another franchise just for the sake of tying them together is fucking stupid.

    Prime example, Iron Man 2. Just a launching pad for Avengers, which made the movie itself suffer.

    Give me a solid independent story rather than a marketing ploy any day.

    03 Hulk delved into more of the psychology of the Hulk from the comics than 08 Hulk.

    There was ZERO character dev in 2008 Hulk.

  • i will also be uploading fight scenes between hulk and abomination from the 2008 version tonight since i cant find it anywhere on YT

  • Check out my channel for some good clips of the incredible hulk 2008

  • Timjones066 never ever post comments on comic book movies AGAIN in the first one his roar sounded like a raccoon dying from rabies twice over and no that didn't make since because dat movie didn't make since it waz gar-bâgé it sucked scrodums it waz dumpster juice on the side of a hobo's mobile box home got something to say hit me up on my page

  • I cant belive this you are acually comparing da '03' hulk wit Da '08' are u serious it took em 6 weeks to show hulk in the '03' r u kidding me Da '08 one is the best by far wit no comparison

  • @Bearto3650

    Learn to speak English...maybe your arguments would carry weight then.

  • Hulk 2003 is better by far, the 2008 version was just lots of cheesy action scenes (don't get me started on that joke of a final battle), at least the 2003 version had decent drama and acting

  • Both miss the mark but 2008 is way better.

  • Sooo.... does he just ALWAYS wear purple stretchy boxers?

  • @someguywithsomeface In the 2008 movie he wears normal jeans, but due to his green color the contrast makes it look purple.

  • hulk is beast...literally

  • He would be just like disfigured with stretch marks right??

  • i remember watching the 2003 versoin every day on DVD. man i miss those days. these passed 9 years went fast. now im all grown up :(

  • Hulk 2003 FTW.

  • Edward Norton is the perfect Bruce Banner; hands down. If the 2003 Hulk wasn't all drama and shitty backstories, it may have been good.

  • @DinoDude65 definitely, but in the 03 verison, when the hulk destruction finally got going, it was fuckin awesome. except that dog fight, that shit sucked. and the fact that he jumped 500000 feet. that was retarded.

  • @MrBurgundy76

    The one part I did actually enjoy in 2003 Hulk was when he was unconscious from the plane going so high. He had that dream that he was shaving and Hulk smashed through the mirror. It was a good display of how Hulk and Banner are the different people struggling for the same body. That's about it, though.

    PUNY HUMAN!

  • @DinoDude65 If the 2008 Hulk wasn't all boring ass plot and action, it may have been good.

  • i notized that all the fights of both movies happen at the end... which is gay by the way, they were like 5 minutes long

  • i liked the look of the hulk in the 2003 movie, but the movie it self was shit sooooo boring, i even think i fell asleep, i think the 2008 was better it was faster 2003 was too slow and took way to long to get its point across

    ps: for dumb fucks that think I'm hating I'm not, just giving my take

  • I love this song bitches

  • Hulk is an explosive dude :D

  • From What I have seen of the Avengers Hulk, it seems that it's a cross between 2003 Hulk and 2008 Hulk, leaning more towards the 2003 Hulk, which in my opinion is a good thing.

  • Also the 2003 Hulk had more Character and true emotion.

  • The 2003 Hulk still reminds me more of the comic book Hulk than that freaky lokking 2008 version.

  • 2003's Hulk had better design proportions, even if the way he was animated made it feel like he was made of plasticine... and the green was too bright. 2008's Hulk had a waist, long hair, way too ripped and cut, was too much of a pretty boy. Hopefully they've learned from past mistakes and the Hulk in the Avengers will improve on these two.

  • @magnumcornetto i gave you thumbs down when you said 'way too ripped' no i disagree, that is hulk, that's how he's meant to be, and i liked it, other than that i agree with you, but that comment made me give u a thumbs down, sorry.

  • @bejbejbej1 That's ok. Maybe it was a poor choice of words, Hulk is supposed to have muscles upon muscles. what I didn't like about 2008's version was all the muscle striations, it looked terrible in my opinion.

  • @magnumcornetto Yeah the avengers hulk really does look like a combination of the other two versions, although slightly more like the 2003 version which is a good thing.

  • the new hulk kinda looks like ronny from the jersey shore

  • alex rodriguez

    

  • not to be a thumbs up whore but who agrees with me when I say that hulk should be in the olympics?

  • @That1Guy1999 he would win the long jump!

  • @That1Guy1999 yeah I agree he should try winning an olympic medal that would be funny.

  • hulk 2003 looks like shrek..

  • 2008

  • damm the 2003 hulk soundtrack was the shit

  • The 2003 Hulk was OK but it focused more on Hulks Running and Jumping abilities, which it sucks. Hulk 2008 is the SHIT!! It focus in what Hulk does best...HULK SMASH!

  • I love how people never think the damn movie through. All they consider is the damn action its funny. 2003 had everything had everything the Hulk needs and no he does not need an enemy that matches his own strength -______-

  • @davedirector7 Sure it focused on stroy but it didn't really give enough of what hulk does........ Total destructiojn. If the 2003 movie put a little more emphasis on destruction it wud be the best

  • @shogunofshotgunz it still is the best. It had its moments where the Hulk proves himself to be a monstrous figure and it had its emotional aspects. Hulk 2003 still wins unlike 2008 which had only the destruction

  • 2003 BETTER!

  • incredible hulk was bettter i mean cause 08 hulk was much more destructive and brutal and i mean cmon 03 hulk got his but whooped by dogs guys dogs

  • i agree the only good thing about the 08 film was the introduction of the avengers between stark and rosss thats it!

  • Idk.......2003 version has always been a guilty pleasure for me. 2008 version didn't really do anything for me. And another thing- Ed norton was a TERRIBLE hulk. Eric bana was way better

  • 2003 was much better

  • 03 Hulk was garbage! That movie sucked ass! 08 Hulk was much better!

  • @Bdog1277 wat r u like 10...hulk 03 was so much better, in storyline and in action

  • @XxTheBossChannelxX Naw fool, 08 was just the better movie. That 03 shit damn near out me to sleep. boring ass storyline for a boring ass movie and the hulk 03 looked like some damn green clay.

  • @Bdog1277 Naw fool.

  • @Bdog1277 It's funny cause I actually fell asleep when I saw this in theaters. But you got to take into consideration I was 5.

  • @Bdog1277 Not.

  • Hulk 03 ftw!

  • I Did The Math Hulk is 5tm tall

  • why doesnt he sponsor jordans???

    

  • IM A FAN OF THE '03 HULK MOVIE PERSONALLY...

  • 03.

  • lol 5:33 Ronnie Coleman :D

  • loved both hulk. if the 03 had the same cg it wouldnt been more epic.

  • ever wonder how big the hulk dick is

  • best hulk ever lou ferrigno

    big lou is the man

  • 08 may have a closer connection to the comics but 03 Hulk was much more intense and fun to watch. It was so good. The anger, the power, you could really feel what banner was dealing with. Him wrestling helicopters, smashing tanks, beating the ground to death, dealing with his father that kind of made him to an object. It really reached a sort of pinnacle in things like hatred and agony. The 2003 Hulk is a more realistic Hulk as if it would really happen nowadays. all in all 03 Hulk was badass

  • Edward Norton is best Bruce Banner.

  • I have to go with 08 hulk. Ang Lee's hulk story line was so far away from the comic story lines or even the cartoons. And I see alot of people going on about how skinny the 08 hulk was but thats because they used football linemen as the base instead of bodybuilders.

  • The Hulk 03 runs faster and jumps much higher than the Hulk 08. Besides, the Hulk 03 has more conscience of his existence than the Hulk 08, Bruce Banner 03 has more control of his body than Hulk 08. And finally, Hulk 03 looks more real than the other one. =D You now know which one I prefer, dont you? ;)

  • 08 hulk is fuckn ripped

  • wonder mow much hulk can bench :L

  • sorry but the 08 hulk is more real. It follows the comic hulk a lot more closely. hulk does not get bigger when he gets angrier and just seems more like something that could be... not just something on the movie screen.

  • @XJadynX "is more real" "follows the comic hulk a lot more closely" wth? so all comics are real?

    Hulk 2003 has better visuals so in terms of technological aspects, Hulk here wins

  • @davedirector7 So you only enjoy a movie if it looks pretty? Never mind if they blow hulk out of proportion.. give him things that don;t even come close to his history like growing in size when he's angry?? Ohh it looks better so it is better.... his FATHER is absorbing man?!?!? REALLY?!?!? The movie was a massive bomb unlike hulk 2008 which looked good AND had a good story to it following the HISTORY of the hulk.. not some bullshit Hollywood crap.

  • @XJadynX lmaoooo listen this isnt the comics. The filmmakers were trying to bring Hulk onto the big screen. YOU REALLY CAN'T JUDGE OVER A DAMN MOVIE SINCE YOU ARE A COMIC BOOK FAN. If the movie is always the same as the source it was taken from, it would suck. Hulk 2008 looked good????? Damn man. 2003 visuals were made by Industrial Light and Magic, the company who made the visuals for Spielbergs films, Star Wars, Iron man, and YOU ARE TELLING ME IT DID NOT LOOK BETTER THEN THE 2008 VERSION????

  • HULK 2003 BEST

  • @Stalker2965 Yeah a Cartoon CGI, Gamma Mutated dogs, and a badly done Asborbing man is better than the Incredible Hulk. NOT!

  • @biguy617 Yes it is.

  • @zezuntxiduntxi You can't even explain why it is better. I can explain why Norton is better. Even the CGI looks better in Norton's movie and Hulk speaks. How is that not cool?

  • @Stalker2965 Disagree

  • Cruz01ful u don't know water urn talking about that fight was awesome with awesome those explosions and hulk was losing at first until he almost choked through guy out. U CALL THAT LAME

  • @ stubbornmook 08 Hulk is way better than 03 08 hulk kicked a guy into a tree 08 hulk is just awesome

  • 03 hulk looks like george lopez

  • I thought dat the fight about hulk vs abomination was going to be way cooler, to be honest, dat fight WAS GAY

  • 08 HULK the best out of the two

  • For me its the 03 Hulk, the 03 Hulk was much stronger than the 08 Hulk

  • 03 just was better. thats all. Better Movie, well playd, and cooler fightscenes.. and actually the hulk get stronger when he was more angry

  • the 08 hulk would be awesome if they made a scene where the hulk jumps and stuff...

  • i wanna see 03 hulk vs abomination

  • 03 hulk looked more realistic an bigger...but the overall movie was ok it was waay to slow

  • I must say Hulk 2003. Really its easy to say. Actors played they role much better and sensory.

    Hulk was better in 2003, how he looked and all other. I actually don't like Incredible hulk...

    This movie was about another Hulk.. Not about Hulk which we all know

  • I think 2003 was better, in da 2008 da guy turned into hulk only 4 FCKING TIMES, da 2003 guy turned into hulk a few more times, but dat dosent mean i dont like da 2008 movie, one think i rlly loved bout 2008 was how hulk looked

  • The 03 hulk just went on a proper diet and did a lot of cardio and got ripped.

  • well the hulk in 03 looks more like the comic book hulk so i would say hulk 03 but 08 is not bad nether i mean i say they tried to hard with it try and make him look more real witch he kinda dose i just think if you make him look like the comic you nailed it

  • I couldnt tell any difference

  • I was 13 in 2003 so was really not pleased with the drama Hulk that year. NEEDS MOAR ACTION!!!

    Then 2008 came with another Hulk movie. More meaner and pissed off. Liked 08 one. Hulk 03 design is more on the perfect bodybuild while 08 focused more on muscles and less fat.

    Watched 2003 Hulk again yesterday and somehow can finally understand the weight of the story the movie was trying to show. Loved the action in 08 better though. Jusy my 2 cents. Ferrigno still smashes ALL! lol

  • Like is you came for Hulk FC Porto.

  • 08 Hulk is Jack's inner rage

  • Discussing the design of Ang Lee's Hulk vs. '08 Hulk is like discussing whether chocolate is better than vanilla. Who cares? Ang Lee's Hulk is a better movie that tells an interesting story about the relationships of family and how they affect the life of the individual... and some tanks get thrown around, which is fun to watch.

  • hulk 03 can jump more distance and can run faster and has more endurance ,also demonstrated much more strenght

  • I've always said and always well say, 2003 is best in everything, there are certain aspects that are better graphics in 08 but not way too ... and the enormous change they did in the 08 with the cast and all, was the worst

  • 2003 wins with alooot

  • I don't understand these arguments at all, 03 was the worst movie ever made. that is why they remade it. not saying 08 was a great movie either, but it was better than 03 by far.

  • hate this music

    

  • If Hollywood would have given ME the job to do the script I would have done better then both. Neither of the films stayed true to the comic. The first one screwed with the origin story while the second film made Hulk less pwerful and less able to travel like he did both in the comic and in the first film. One of people's gripe about the first film was that Hulk could jump for miles but in the comic he could also. I would get it right and do a real Hulk film. Just sayin!! hahaha 03 Hulk was best.

  • 1:31 LOVE THE SCENE

  • 2012 hulk will be better then both (avengers)

  • 03 hulk was better admit it everyone 

  • I like the 03 Hulk better. It's not all about CG, it's also how well "Bruce" plays the Hulk. Maybe this is just me, but the 03 Hulk seems to actually turn into the Hulk when he's just angry, which is 1 reason why I prefer 03, while the 08 turns into the Hulk more when he is excited more so than plain angry (e.g chase, helicopter fall, etc). Not to mention, Bruce of 03 fit the comic character look very well, compared to 08. 08 Hulk does look more angry, but 03 showed more power in the movie 

  • @Djalmanac Well, 08 is muh more acurate to the comics! Because Bruce transforms into HUlk not just when he is pissed of! It's when his heart beats faster! Edward Norton was, imo, the BEST Bruce that we had so far!

  • @Djalmanac the main reason 08 is better than the 03 movie is because this 7 min clip showed the only good part of the movie. first time i ever considered asking for my money back, and it was a 2nd run movie place, yes i felt like asking for my $.50 back

  • @acester86 Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I wouldn't like 03 more if this was the only clip I liked.

  • @acester86 pathetic noob

  • @Djalmanac(:: great!!!