I live in Boise, Idaho which is near where Mr. Slick lives. The other day I was at a Hastings entertainment store and I could not believe what I saw. The great and perfect Matt Slick was looking at the Maxim and Playboy magazines they had. I walked right over a began looking at them as well. I said "Hello mr. Slick" and he very quickly left the store. It was very amusing.
i dont understand why theres so many haters in the comment section. do you guys youtube Matt Slick just to hate on him? lol nothing else better to do?
26 “If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters—yes, even their own life—such a person cannot be my disciple.
An excerpt and clear enough - let the spin begin. Regards
God created the heaves and earth and Matt Slick needs your money to run it. LOL this guy is a joke. Hey Matt all those books behind you there look like they have never been off the shelf. There are many false teachers now days and Matt is just one of the many. Stay away from this self centered man he is in it for the money.
@BrothersFreedive I can't remember why they said they used it and for what website but it's unliky they would use C++ for anything unless it's a large website.
Apologetics is an apology for all the errors, contradictions, and discrepancies in the Bible. Slick says it's a "defense" of the Faith. That basically means they're defending God, which is amazing to think about. Why does anyone need to defend an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving God?
Matt Slick is not everything he claims to be. He was and always will be a chatter from PalTalk, who colored up his website with C++ code.
Funny thing, he refuses to debate Calvinism anymore, he has been challenged numerous times on it. Now he's teamed up with James White, (coincidentally another PalTalker) who shys away from debating Calvinism too.
What's with these guys? Come on Matt, accept a challenge for once outside of your private internet radio show.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"Debating creationists on the topic of evolution is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon; it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hey, Matt!
Remember when you were debating with Matt Dillahunty and you said everything had to be physical or conceptual and he said, "no, things can be neither," and you said that wasn't a good answer?
Then after that how you said that god was neither of those (he's spiritual)? CHECKMATE!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Matt Slick only WISHES he could call himself an apologetic of the Christian faith. Ravi Zacharias, C. H. Lewis, etc. those are apologetics. No thanks Matt...we Christians do NOT need you. In fact, we would rather not have you because you are rude and have no couth. Go get passionate about a Bible study at your church.....but not publicly, please.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Something has "Clicked" in his head. By this I mean he knows that logic, scientific and historical evidence proves he is full of shit but he can't see it. It is sad.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Matt Slick - Masters Degree - Pastor 15 yrs. HMMMMM - I guess that gives him all power. I have the same credentials. that does not give me any authority... but to love others in Christ. Jesus Christ spent his days here loving others and spending His time walking amng the lost and needy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I sort of pity Matt Slick too. I know he does not deserve too much pity because of his lies, slanders and defenses of child rape, torture, and genocide in the name of the bible god but I have just a little pity for him. He really does not get it. He doesn't seem to realize how foolish and stupid he is making himself appear and the depth of his severe ignorance he reveals when he debates atheists who are more inteligent and knowlegable of TAG and other arguments. It is sad to watch. I pity him.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Under my last login name "hupac" before I was banned a third time all under different login names I mocked many of CARM VP Diane Sellnar over her absurd insane whacked out mythical dogmas. I asked her how the plants of the Earth that depended on photosyntheis to reproduce and florush did so before the Sun was created? Sellnar's replies were truly comedy in action! Then the bitch did WHAT SHE DOES BEST against those who refute her the "dreaded infraction points!" O the horror of it all! Waa!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You ought to hear the program where he claims an atheist said God is God and God is not God at the same time. Then an atheist owned and schooled him live on radio for overlooking the double negative. It was awesome and funny. Slick was slick in trying to cover up his total embarassment. He bore his ass alright. It has two eyes, two ears, one mouth and one nose on it. And I bet if he had a civity search done on him Diane Sellnar would be found living up his ass!
Watch it again with an unbiased mind ,,,,,you didn't see the same debate I did .....In fact, I've seen Slick try the TAG argument in debate 3 times.....He got trounced each time and then went on to claim victory.....The man's a fool!!!
Dillahunty's argument falls apart upon application.
I wanted to know how Dillahunty believes in absolutes at the beginning.
It seemed to me Slick could have said "god is not not god ever." And made fun of the rock in space comment. Or what if we find out that the rock was really a shell of some animal. Was it still a rock?
Logic is dependant on God. Not that can they exist together quite the contrary. Dilllahunty gets angry and hangs up fast and I think Slick was aware and trying to reason
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I suggest YOU watch it again - especially Slick's reaction when Dillahunty asked him if god could do something that was logically impossible and made it obvious that god was just as subjective to logical absolutes as human perceptive and therefore couldn't be their author.
Slick whinged and waffled of the subject for 10 minutes!! - then got pawned again in his new subject.
Several members of the audience did it in the other debate too. His opponent didn't even address it -it's a lousy argument
Christianity according to any man, even a Slick one, is nothing more than more dung on the platter. Because you are setting yourself up as an authority you will be held accountable at that level.
when i was 17 and a junior in high school, we had to do a research paper and i went to carm and i was a jehovah's witness and i went to look around and everything on that website changed my life, i thank matt for making that site because i wouldnt have believed in God and changed my faith,
Funny D'souza has called him out on more than one occasion and he has yet to debate him. As a matter of fact Dawkins believes that an alien planted the first single cell!(Expelled the movie from his mouth)
Besides his position has changed. He might be turning into a Deist!
Go educate yourself on the full interview instead of the piece cut out for that movie, how stupid of you not to have checked this information, it is known by most everyone other then a few dumb ones like yourself.
He is not changing his mind, how un educated are you really?
Now I don't blame Dawkins for not wanting to debate D'souza. D'souzas debate with Dan Barker was the worst I've ever seen...and Barker, for being a genius, was looking quite impotent against a featherweight like D'souza. It was shameful on both sides.
btiggy: Dawkins has said he won't debate Christians any more. I'm guessing it's because he's seen his arguments are groundless and he'd be shown (by Slick, among others) to be a man who should stick to his own area of expertise.
I've talked to Matt and he is an intellectual Christian. He uses logic, not emotion to argue for the existence of god. That's why I like him. He's not like those church going idiots on The God Who Wasn't There that couldn't answer a simple question.
Matt Slick has been debating a 21 year old mormom on his radio show. The guys name is Mike and despite his young age he is giving Matt all he can handle. Mike gets Matt so upset because he is able to give thoughtful and articulate answers and he doesn't back down when Matt tries to declare that he has proven his point even though he hasn't. I am a christian not a mormon but I do appreciate Mikes knowledge of the bible and his ability to hold his own in a debate with a very experienced apologist.
This guy is sneaky..he picks his fights like this, he challenges to confront a question that would take days and hours to teach but he expects a answer within moments.
He won't ask any questions where the answers would destroy his faith based beliefs.
Of course this guy wouldn't challenge Dawkins, Hitchens or Harris.
Scary part for him is Dawkins can answer some of the questions that would normally take days but that's to Dawkins credit.
yeah you're right this guy is a weenie.. he can be owned in tough questions ...but guess what. i got a guy who can't be disputed ...he died and rose and is ever interceding for the saints of God ..his truth is undisputable and if you think you know guys who can agrue their way out of a paper bag ..hey they get to try why they see him .. cuz like they tried to tell thomas ..He's alive you idiot ..BELIEVE US we saw him..unfortunately he had to wait 3 days and then come face to face with the truth
God our Creator and Jesus Christ our Savior never debunked. It is your choice to not face the truth. You will come face to face and it will be undeniable. And your opinion will be debunked.
How are we to defend the faith without debunking?...Atheists have turned Christian according to Christian's arguments said in debates...I'm sure of it...Jesus never NEEDED to debunk because there wasn't much to debunk ABOUT since He was the LIVING SACRIFICE HIMSELF!...Get it right...There's a war going on and the Christians are involved...Creation, NWO order evidence, and Church corruption are GREAT things to talk about in debunking seminars in order to win souls...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
That's really funny. For Dawkins having the mental prowess to answer questions that would normally take days, he fell flat on his back when he debated Dr. John Lennox.
Lennox proved that all atheists, including yourself and Dawkins, are using the same 'blockbuster' positions that were refuted and closed in debates back in the early 90s
....Yet they still get repeated even worse than anything Kent Hovind ever spun.
in spite of all the advances of human science and learning ,people cannot accept that they will die. Until this happens peddlars of medieval witch doctory will still find an audience ,and will profit from them. Cast into the flames for being a physicist? yep and boils are caused by impure thoughts. Its true! It was written in a book
Well put. You know, there's a reason they called it the "Dark Ages", and it wasn't because they were in Alaska in the winter. Not to worry. The next Einstein or Hawking than comes along who are going to find true answers to the universe won't be influenced by these crazy superstitious beliefs that the plebs need to give their life meaning.
Bob , lets see who will trundle out the "But Einstein believed in God" cheesy old reply.
I will then redirect them to Wikipedia , the good book and infallible word of someone called Todd from Illinois , where they can look up METAPHOR and NO HE BLEEDING DIDN`T.
I was listening to the woman who had her pitbull cloned. She was attacked by a Mastiff which bit her fingers off and she asked "the Lord" to save her , and her dog drove it away.
She was full of gratitude that Jehovah helped her out , but she had nothing to say about the fact that , by her logic , God sent a mastiff to bite her fingers off. I would be calling him a cunt in a loud voice.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Lately Matt Slick has been whining about his radio show not recieving enough donations to stay on the air. If he has to give up his radio show it will simply prove that GOD doesn't appreciate what that arrogant pompous jerk represents. He takes it upon himself to judge others and say who is and isn't saved. I hope he gets what he deserves which is to burn in hell. Keep it up Mr. Slick you are a piece of shit.
apologia100-You must not listen to his show. He tells almost everyone who disagrees with him that they are not saved. I don't keep track of the names of the people that call his show but I have heard him many times tell people that they aren't saved for one reason or another. Sometimes I agree with him, but more often than not I find that he is judging people in a way that only GOD has a right to judge. I think he might be turning people away from christianity when he gets to judgemental.
Well you know there is essential christian Doctrine. It's in the scriptures, and logically if someone believes in the wrong God then they can't be saved. I'm not trying to sound like a biggot but think about it.
everytime i ask a christian if all of the native americans who died between 33 AD and 1492 went hell they always say that as long as they believed in some greater power then they were probably ok.
this obviously does not jive with what you're saying here.
"this obviously does not jive with what you're saying here.
thoughts?"- Very good question, however I don't think every native went to hell( technically nobody is there right now) but I believe( because the Bible says it (John 14:6) that nobody can go to heaven without Jesus. God gives two witnesses ( internal( conscious) and external( creation)) that he exists and if you respond to both then I believe that Jesus will reviel himself in some way so that they can go to heaven.
Yes apologia, as shaffer said, you seriously must not listen to his show, he says it pretty regularly when the opportunity arises, as he did for years when he would open his CARM room on Paltalk, every thursday night, from 2002-2007
"he says it pretty regularly when the opportunity arises"-Ok but do you agree that there are essential christian doctrine? And if so then logically if someone believes in the wrong God then wouldn't that result in damnation? (John 14:6)
vanmartinmpg: You might find answers to your questions on John Piper's site, desiringgod - org or on John MacArthur's site, gty - org or even on monergism - org.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Matt, you do a shoddy job at defending your doctrine of Calvinism. Come back to Paltalk why don't ya? Too many bruises in the last 8 years?
I debunk you personally on my website, and last time you were in Angelic's room you backed down from debating me after swinging around your false bravado, acting like a hotshot. (I saved the text!)
Didn't know I was in town huh? Too bad Youtube doesn't allow links, do a search for "The Jesus Commandment" and you should find my site easily.
RawChristian: Take a look at John Piper's site, desiringgod [dot] org and do a search for "What We Believe." You'll find an article on what his church believes about Calvinism - it's easy reading and fairly short (though not comprehensive). Read it and you'll see why Spurgeon called Calvinism, "biblical Christianity."
Talitha, go to TheJesusCommandment [dot] com...that is my own website, it's been up for 3 years, I have over 80,000 hits. On my site you will find point-by-point refutation of John Piper, using the very page you mentioned as my source.
You will also find the same for Matt Slick. I have called Matt personally at home, he and I go way back on Paltalk, where he refuses to debate anyone anymore, unless he can control the room.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Usually arguments for the validity of Christianity are simply old arguments of Kant, Anselm and Aquinas. All three of these guys basically take absurd assumptions to try and fit them to the Christian version of God. But really, the assumptions on their face, don't lead to any particular God, if one at all. Like the First Cause/Mover argument.
Plus they try to get you believe that only the Master race gets into heaven , and the magic creature that willed the universe into being with a mere thought , is deeply concerned about where your willy goes.
the blunder u commit is in your wording. it is stated in such a way as to cast the beliefs of Christianity into something that its not. words and phrasings like master race and magic are a stylistic move by you to taint the actual view held by Christians.
Only the chosen people shall get into heaven? Ok so I gave you some Nazi connotations sorry , but you do believe in talking snakes and men with wings ( which could only function by magic , dont you? )
Here is how strong the critical thinking is. Naturalism infers that over a relevant range matter is constant. But naturalists can't be sure it won't ever change. So preferable to the horror of that chaos, lets imagine a God who keeps things constant. Good thing we have a gracious God to keep rocks from turning into birds.
So, Matt, if I take the class do I get a diploma suitable for framing at the end of the class?
No I did not expose him; it was in fact a christian here on YT by the name beachtides24(amanda). She was directly attaching us atheist without warrant. And I just happened to notice that the arguments she was using(as flawed as they are) were beyond her years, and apparent theological stage/knowledge. So I checked, and found that she was directly plagiarizing slicks works as if it were her own.
This has been flagged as spam show
I live in Boise, Idaho which is near where Mr. Slick lives. The other day I was at a Hastings entertainment store and I could not believe what I saw. The great and perfect Matt Slick was looking at the Maxim and Playboy magazines they had. I walked right over a began looking at them as well. I said "Hello mr. Slick" and he very quickly left the store. It was very amusing.
MrSupernova890 8 months ago
i dont understand why theres so many haters in the comment section. do you guys youtube Matt Slick just to hate on him? lol nothing else better to do?
EJFRANCOIS222 9 months ago
Know what Matt? You could "go out there and learn" too.
Go on. I dare ya.
Hufflewaffle 1 year ago
Does Matt walk the walk? Apologists quote scripture at face value when it pleases and spin when it doesn't. Example: Luke 14:26 (New International Version, ©2010)
26 “If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters—yes, even their own life—such a person cannot be my disciple.
An excerpt and clear enough - let the spin begin. Regards
1Skeptik1 1 year ago
A Masters in Divinity.. might as well be a Masters in Superman. What a sham.
bobbelheadedmidget 1 year ago
God created the heaves and earth and Matt Slick needs your money to run it. LOL this guy is a joke. Hey Matt all those books behind you there look like they have never been off the shelf. There are many false teachers now days and Matt is just one of the many. Stay away from this self centered man he is in it for the money.
Calvuslamp 1 year ago
@BOBSTAHL Why do you feel the need to come on these videos and rant if God doesnt exist? Go watch an evolution video or something
mbernal41 1 year ago
This guy said false ideologies like atheism and abortion!!
that is good tv
VarialProductions 1 year ago
@leejw00t354 probably for the back end, why wouldn't you use c++?
BrothersFreedive 1 year ago
@BrothersFreedive I can't remember why they said they used it and for what website but it's unliky they would use C++ for anything unless it's a large website.
leejw00t354 1 year ago
So the apologists are trying to say what they use is critical thinking. What a joke. There is nothing critical about saying Oh god did it.
sambricky 1 year ago
Apologetics is an apology for all the errors, contradictions, and discrepancies in the Bible. Slick says it's a "defense" of the Faith. That basically means they're defending God, which is amazing to think about. Why does anyone need to defend an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving God?
kpyto87 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahah
"master of divinity"
WaywardSonCRO 2 years ago
Amen! God Bless!
fatamorgana1989 2 years ago 7
Thanks.
hdiylove7 2 years ago
Unctuous, smarmy, smug, and self-absorbed.
I wouldn't buy a used car from this clown.
ClumsyRoot 2 years ago
This guy is an ass.
Apologetics = making excuses for the ridiculous.
Atheism is not a belief, belief system or ideology.
slipcurve 2 years ago
Matt Slick is not everything he claims to be. He was and always will be a chatter from PalTalk, who colored up his website with C++ code.
Funny thing, he refuses to debate Calvinism anymore, he has been challenged numerous times on it. Now he's teamed up with James White, (coincidentally another PalTalker) who shys away from debating Calvinism too.
What's with these guys? Come on Matt, accept a challenge for once outside of your private internet radio show.
RawChristianSuperman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"Debating creationists on the topic of evolution is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon; it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory."
- Scott D. Weitzenhoffer
EvenTakenIsTaken 2 years ago
lol at that quote.
TheRealBladeRunner 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hey, Matt!
Remember when you were debating with Matt Dillahunty and you said everything had to be physical or conceptual and he said, "no, things can be neither," and you said that wasn't a good answer?
Then after that how you said that god was neither of those (he's spiritual)? CHECKMATE!
DogmaGogMagogMa 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Matt Slick is irrational.
maglavagna 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Matt Slick only WISHES he could call himself an apologetic of the Christian faith. Ravi Zacharias, C. H. Lewis, etc. those are apologetics. No thanks Matt...we Christians do NOT need you. In fact, we would rather not have you because you are rude and have no couth. Go get passionate about a Bible study at your church.....but not publicly, please.
tkhk2004 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Something has "Clicked" in his head. By this I mean he knows that logic, scientific and historical evidence proves he is full of shit but he can't see it. It is sad.
wmgroutofthebox 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Matt Slick - Masters Degree - Pastor 15 yrs. HMMMMM - I guess that gives him all power. I have the same credentials. that does not give me any authority... but to love others in Christ. Jesus Christ spent his days here loving others and spending His time walking amng the lost and needy.
4givn4life 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I sort of pity Matt Slick too. I know he does not deserve too much pity because of his lies, slanders and defenses of child rape, torture, and genocide in the name of the bible god but I have just a little pity for him. He really does not get it. He doesn't seem to realize how foolish and stupid he is making himself appear and the depth of his severe ignorance he reveals when he debates atheists who are more inteligent and knowlegable of TAG and other arguments. It is sad to watch. I pity him.
wmgroutofthebox 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This guy is a liar and a fraud. Anyone who listens to him and takes him seriously needs help.
Excommunicator 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Under my last login name "hupac" before I was banned a third time all under different login names I mocked many of CARM VP Diane Sellnar over her absurd insane whacked out mythical dogmas. I asked her how the plants of the Earth that depended on photosyntheis to reproduce and florush did so before the Sun was created? Sellnar's replies were truly comedy in action! Then the bitch did WHAT SHE DOES BEST against those who refute her the "dreaded infraction points!" O the horror of it all! Waa!
wmgroutofthebox 2 years ago
slick is slick
creeman007 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You ought to hear the program where he claims an atheist said God is God and God is not God at the same time. Then an atheist owned and schooled him live on radio for overlooking the double negative. It was awesome and funny. Slick was slick in trying to cover up his total embarassment. He bore his ass alright. It has two eyes, two ears, one mouth and one nose on it. And I bet if he had a civity search done on him Diane Sellnar would be found living up his ass!
Slick is getting owned a lot now
wmgroutofthebox 3 years ago
TheoreticalBullshit did a great job of deconstructing TAG.
OllyakaEnfillade 3 years ago 5
slick is slick....schooled dillahunty
creeman007 3 years ago
slick schooled dillahunty...
creeman007 3 years ago
Watch it again with an unbiased mind ,,,,,you didn't see the same debate I did .....In fact, I've seen Slick try the TAG argument in debate 3 times.....He got trounced each time and then went on to claim victory.....The man's a fool!!!
Tobytrim 3 years ago 4
Dillahunty's argument falls apart upon application.
I wanted to know how Dillahunty believes in absolutes at the beginning.
It seemed to me Slick could have said "god is not not god ever." And made fun of the rock in space comment. Or what if we find out that the rock was really a shell of some animal. Was it still a rock?
Logic is dependant on God. Not that can they exist together quite the contrary. Dilllahunty gets angry and hangs up fast and I think Slick was aware and trying to reason
Droptopcadillac 3 years ago
no....you are the fool...watch the debate again
jhamel 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I suggest YOU watch it again - especially Slick's reaction when Dillahunty asked him if god could do something that was logically impossible and made it obvious that god was just as subjective to logical absolutes as human perceptive and therefore couldn't be their author.
Slick whinged and waffled of the subject for 10 minutes!! - then got pawned again in his new subject.
Several members of the audience did it in the other debate too. His opponent didn't even address it -it's a lousy argument
Tobytrim 2 years ago
Why would faith need to be defended if it is so divine and correct?
Well just like nazi's need to defend their moronic views , religious people need to defend theirs.
This guy is a tool, he was completely owned by Matt Dillahunty.
This guy really thinks he is something, smug as hell with nothing to back it up.
Swecan76 3 years ago 3
go listen to the debate, sit down, think and wise up.
jhamel 3 years ago
what a tool
RobotzAreAwesome 3 years ago
Matt, you're equipping them with fairy tales pal.
DaxxFinsta 3 years ago 3
i agree this guy gives me the creeps..
hazel43717 3 years ago 2
Christianity according to any man, even a Slick one, is nothing more than more dung on the platter. Because you are setting yourself up as an authority you will be held accountable at that level.
jasonlwharton 3 years ago
Your a master of a christian school? lol
Areyoufockingcrazy 3 years ago
Funny that is what atheist been asking for years
btiggy420 3 years ago
when i was 17 and a junior in high school, we had to do a research paper and i went to carm and i was a jehovah's witness and i went to look around and everything on that website changed my life, i thank matt for making that site because i wouldnt have believed in God and changed my faith,
flavadave47 3 years ago 7
Richard Dawkins would take this guy apart like he does when he is taking apart religion and showing it's lies.
btiggy420 3 years ago
Prove it.
amindbody 3 years ago
Funny D'souza has called him out on more than one occasion and he has yet to debate him. As a matter of fact Dawkins believes that an alien planted the first single cell!(Expelled the movie from his mouth)
Besides his position has changed. He might be turning into a Deist!
He said:
A serious case could be made for a deistic God.
On his second debate with Dr. Lennox.
ps9teacher 3 years ago
Go educate yourself on the full interview instead of the piece cut out for that movie, how stupid of you not to have checked this information, it is known by most everyone other then a few dumb ones like yourself.
He is not changing his mind, how un educated are you really?
btiggy420 3 years ago
Stupid? Nice. Go read HIS book you're not being intellectually honest. I won't call you stupid but you are ignorant.
ps9teacher 3 years ago
Now I don't blame Dawkins for not wanting to debate D'souza. D'souzas debate with Dan Barker was the worst I've ever seen...and Barker, for being a genius, was looking quite impotent against a featherweight like D'souza. It was shameful on both sides.
RawChristianSuperman 3 years ago
btiggy: Dawkins has said he won't debate Christians any more. I'm guessing it's because he's seen his arguments are groundless and he'd be shown (by Slick, among others) to be a man who should stick to his own area of expertise.
Dawkins may be ignorant, but he's not stupid.
talitha00cumi 3 years ago
This guy is the MAN!
I've joined his online schools, and I have learned SO MUCH in such a short space of time!!
I'd recommend any fired-up Christian to go through his stuff, you will be amazed at how much get out of it!
GUARANTEED!
carm (dot) org
[Recommended by doctorh2005]
doctorh2005 3 years ago
I've talked to Matt and he is an intellectual Christian. He uses logic, not emotion to argue for the existence of god. That's why I like him. He's not like those church going idiots on The God Who Wasn't There that couldn't answer a simple question.
amindbody 3 years ago 2
Matt Slick has been debating a 21 year old mormom on his radio show. The guys name is Mike and despite his young age he is giving Matt all he can handle. Mike gets Matt so upset because he is able to give thoughtful and articulate answers and he doesn't back down when Matt tries to declare that he has proven his point even though he hasn't. I am a christian not a mormon but I do appreciate Mikes knowledge of the bible and his ability to hold his own in a debate with a very experienced apologist.
shafferman0126 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This guy is sneaky..he picks his fights like this, he challenges to confront a question that would take days and hours to teach but he expects a answer within moments.
He won't ask any questions where the answers would destroy his faith based beliefs.
Of course this guy wouldn't challenge Dawkins, Hitchens or Harris.
Scary part for him is Dawkins can answer some of the questions that would normally take days but that's to Dawkins credit.
Religion has been Debunked.
btiggy420 3 years ago
yeah you're right this guy is a weenie.. he can be owned in tough questions ...but guess what. i got a guy who can't be disputed ...he died and rose and is ever interceding for the saints of God ..his truth is undisputable and if you think you know guys who can agrue their way out of a paper bag ..hey they get to try why they see him .. cuz like they tried to tell thomas ..He's alive you idiot ..BELIEVE US we saw him..unfortunately he had to wait 3 days and then come face to face with the truth
zwreckless1 3 years ago
This is the greatest comment I have ever read.
God our Creator and Jesus Christ our Savior never debunked. It is your choice to not face the truth. You will come face to face and it will be undeniable. And your opinion will be debunked.
AnnymsVoice 3 years ago
Wow a nice comment isn't that refreshing .. the lord loves you bro..
zwreckless1 3 years ago
How are we to defend the faith without debunking?...Atheists have turned Christian according to Christian's arguments said in debates...I'm sure of it...Jesus never NEEDED to debunk because there wasn't much to debunk ABOUT since He was the LIVING SACRIFICE HIMSELF!...Get it right...There's a war going on and the Christians are involved...Creation, NWO order evidence, and Church corruption are GREAT things to talk about in debunking seminars in order to win souls...
God be with...
thelamb777 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's really funny. For Dawkins having the mental prowess to answer questions that would normally take days, he fell flat on his back when he debated Dr. John Lennox.
Lennox proved that all atheists, including yourself and Dawkins, are using the same 'blockbuster' positions that were refuted and closed in debates back in the early 90s
....Yet they still get repeated even worse than anything Kent Hovind ever spun.
RawChristianSuperman 3 years ago
You are so right RawChristianSuperman! Atheism is a weak position.
apologia100 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
god is a myth. it's the 21st century people, let's try and catch up.
bobcarp23 3 years ago
in spite of all the advances of human science and learning ,people cannot accept that they will die. Until this happens peddlars of medieval witch doctory will still find an audience ,and will profit from them. Cast into the flames for being a physicist? yep and boils are caused by impure thoughts. Its true! It was written in a book
bufantas 3 years ago
Well put. You know, there's a reason they called it the "Dark Ages", and it wasn't because they were in Alaska in the winter. Not to worry. The next Einstein or Hawking than comes along who are going to find true answers to the universe won't be influenced by these crazy superstitious beliefs that the plebs need to give their life meaning.
bobcarp23 3 years ago
Bob , lets see who will trundle out the "But Einstein believed in God" cheesy old reply.
I will then redirect them to Wikipedia , the good book and infallible word of someone called Todd from Illinois , where they can look up METAPHOR and NO HE BLEEDING DIDN`T.
bufantas 3 years ago
I was listening to the woman who had her pitbull cloned. She was attacked by a Mastiff which bit her fingers off and she asked "the Lord" to save her , and her dog drove it away.
She was full of gratitude that Jehovah helped her out , but she had nothing to say about the fact that , by her logic , God sent a mastiff to bite her fingers off. I would be calling him a cunt in a loud voice.
bufantas 3 years ago
Well obviously "logic" is something that waived bye-bye to that lady long ago.
bobcarp23 3 years ago
bufantas, its youropinion the bible is made up of supestitions. unless of course, you can explain why by facts.
blastdude12 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Lately Matt Slick has been whining about his radio show not recieving enough donations to stay on the air. If he has to give up his radio show it will simply prove that GOD doesn't appreciate what that arrogant pompous jerk represents. He takes it upon himself to judge others and say who is and isn't saved. I hope he gets what he deserves which is to burn in hell. Keep it up Mr. Slick you are a piece of shit.
shafferman0126 3 years ago
"He takes it upon himself to judge others and say who is and isn't saved."-Who has he said"you aren't saved" to?
apologia100 3 years ago
apologia100-You must not listen to his show. He tells almost everyone who disagrees with him that they are not saved. I don't keep track of the names of the people that call his show but I have heard him many times tell people that they aren't saved for one reason or another. Sometimes I agree with him, but more often than not I find that he is judging people in a way that only GOD has a right to judge. I think he might be turning people away from christianity when he gets to judgemental.
shafferman0126 3 years ago
Well you know there is essential christian Doctrine. It's in the scriptures, and logically if someone believes in the wrong God then they can't be saved. I'm not trying to sound like a biggot but think about it.
apologia100 3 years ago
everytime i ask a christian if all of the native americans who died between 33 AD and 1492 went hell they always say that as long as they believed in some greater power then they were probably ok.
this obviously does not jive with what you're saying here.
thoughts?
yetidetective 3 years ago
"this obviously does not jive with what you're saying here.
thoughts?"- Very good question, however I don't think every native went to hell( technically nobody is there right now) but I believe( because the Bible says it (John 14:6) that nobody can go to heaven without Jesus. God gives two witnesses ( internal( conscious) and external( creation)) that he exists and if you respond to both then I believe that Jesus will reviel himself in some way so that they can go to heaven.
apologia100 3 years ago
Yes apologia, as shaffer said, you seriously must not listen to his show, he says it pretty regularly when the opportunity arises, as he did for years when he would open his CARM room on Paltalk, every thursday night, from 2002-2007
RawChristianSuperman 3 years ago
"he says it pretty regularly when the opportunity arises"-Ok but do you agree that there are essential christian doctrine? And if so then logically if someone believes in the wrong God then wouldn't that result in damnation? (John 14:6)
apologia100 3 years ago
And an ancillary question, how do biblical historians date the authorship of the specific books of the Bible? I welcome your thoughts/
vanmartinmpg 3 years ago
vanmartinmpg: You might find answers to your questions on John Piper's site, desiringgod - org or on John MacArthur's site, gty - org or even on monergism - org.
All 3 are great sites with loads of info.
talitha00cumi 3 years ago
I was wondering if anyone knows what the date of the oldest complete copy of the Old Testament is?
vanmartinmpg 3 years ago
Yey Matt! I remember you from Paltalk :)
FirebrandNIRE 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Matt Slick is not a Christian. He's a Calvinist. Calvinism is the furthest thing from Christianity.
angelicearthling 3 years ago
"Calvinism is the furthest thing from Christianity."-Opinion can you back it up?
apologia100 3 years ago
Yes, she actually can, as can I. Come to Paltalk, where Matt became well known for his many bruises among skilled debaters on the subject.
Or go to TheJesusCommandment [dot] com where you will find my articles on Matt Slick and John Piper.
RawChristianSuperman 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Matt, you do a shoddy job at defending your doctrine of Calvinism. Come back to Paltalk why don't ya? Too many bruises in the last 8 years?
I debunk you personally on my website, and last time you were in Angelic's room you backed down from debating me after swinging around your false bravado, acting like a hotshot. (I saved the text!)
Didn't know I was in town huh? Too bad Youtube doesn't allow links, do a search for "The Jesus Commandment" and you should find my site easily.
RawChristianSuperman 3 years ago
RawChristian: Take a look at John Piper's site, desiringgod [dot] org and do a search for "What We Believe." You'll find an article on what his church believes about Calvinism - it's easy reading and fairly short (though not comprehensive). Read it and you'll see why Spurgeon called Calvinism, "biblical Christianity."
talitha00cumi 3 years ago
Talitha, go to TheJesusCommandment [dot] com...that is my own website, it's been up for 3 years, I have over 80,000 hits. On my site you will find point-by-point refutation of John Piper, using the very page you mentioned as my source.
You will also find the same for Matt Slick. I have called Matt personally at home, he and I go way back on Paltalk, where he refuses to debate anyone anymore, unless he can control the room.
RawChristianSuperman 3 years ago
Matt you think you're so Slick
risen4given 3 years ago
Matt Slick is awesome
LuckRecords 3 years ago
Matt is awesome! He is a gifted apologist and CARM has given me much guidance.
butterflycells 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Usually arguments for the validity of Christianity are simply old arguments of Kant, Anselm and Aquinas. All three of these guys basically take absurd assumptions to try and fit them to the Christian version of God. But really, the assumptions on their face, don't lead to any particular God, if one at all. Like the First Cause/Mover argument.
BlueFireWitch 4 years ago
Plus they try to get you believe that only the Master race gets into heaven , and the magic creature that willed the universe into being with a mere thought , is deeply concerned about where your willy goes.
Good luck Matt!
bufantas 3 years ago
your typical mangled straw man. you use silly terms to describe something to make it look stupid. it only fools the unlearned
veritaslogos 3 years ago
Which part of my claim was inaccurate , learned man?
bufantas 3 years ago
the blunder u commit is in your wording. it is stated in such a way as to cast the beliefs of Christianity into something that its not. words and phrasings like master race and magic are a stylistic move by you to taint the actual view held by Christians.
veritaslogos 3 years ago
Only the chosen people shall get into heaven? Ok so I gave you some Nazi connotations sorry , but you do believe in talking snakes and men with wings ( which could only function by magic , dont you? )
bufantas 3 years ago
im sorry, maybe u could show me how this statement corresponds to the original one.
veritaslogos 3 years ago
Matt was my youth pastor back in 1994 , very
fun guy !
grandconjunct 4 years ago
Here is how strong the critical thinking is. Naturalism infers that over a relevant range matter is constant. But naturalists can't be sure it won't ever change. So preferable to the horror of that chaos, lets imagine a God who keeps things constant. Good thing we have a gracious God to keep rocks from turning into birds.
So, Matt, if I take the class do I get a diploma suitable for framing at the end of the class?
BarryLeder 4 years ago
So you are the "matthew j. slick" in which the christian that I exposed was plagiarizing. It is good to put a face to the name. (pun intended) ;O)
Katalyzt
Katalyzt 4 years ago
Katalyzt you exposed this guy? Just seen this guy on PalTalk...it's amazing
Razua77 2 years ago
No I did not expose him; it was in fact a christian here on YT by the name beachtides24(amanda). She was directly attaching us atheist without warrant. And I just happened to notice that the arguments she was using(as flawed as they are) were beyond her years, and apparent theological stage/knowledge. So I checked, and found that she was directly plagiarizing slicks works as if it were her own.
Katalyzt
Katalyzt 2 years ago
I love this guy! I remember talking with him 15 years ago. I have an apologetics video with information taken from his website.
ClosetAtheist 4 years ago
You're a pathetic coward playing make-believe. Nothing more.
eeirkgeing 4 years ago