Kermode is totally right in that the original TCM had no blood. It was virtually all clever suggestion. Also, the most scary films are ones that explain nothing: to me the scariest film of all is Mulholland Drive. The scene in the diner. I'll say no more.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The remake was done very well and being a huge TCM fan, I had no problem with the remake's prequel. Both were done very well and offered information about my favorite horror villain. I'm sick of this constant bitching about films being too gratuitous and full of nothing but gore and sex when most of what horror films have always given you, is that stuff. It comes with the genre and drop the tired "they lack imagination" bullshit.
@clipsryan Actually, the early slashers like Psycho, Halloween, Black Christmas or the original TCM had very little sex or gore. They relied on narrative tension and atmosphere. Even when good horror is gory, it's using violence as a means to an end; it's not just an excuse to show people getting sliced up. Can you honestly say that's what the remake was doing?
@TulseLuper Most people who grew up watching the originals, always say remakes aren't as good. It's because they're biased like the people who claim books are always better than their movie adaptations. Remake's have better acting and production in my opinion and should be alittle different considering it's a remake. Like song covers, they're suppose to provide the meat of the original and that's it.
@TulseLuper lol at that guy. I mean really? Me personally im sick of base morons believeing themselves entitled to an exposition on 'you need to deal with it' I think they're convinced it paints them as some kind of hard-ass.
@TulseLuper@TulseLuper lol at that guy. I mean really? Me personally im sick of base morons believeing themselves entitled to an exposition on 'you need to deal with it' I think they're convinced it paints them as some kind of hard-ass.
He's so right. These remakes/sequels show how horror movies have lost their imagination and have become about cliches, style and copying other films. The makers think that a horror film should be sadistic, chasing teenagers. There is not one moment of real terror in any of these recent films to match Hooper's original. He understand the emotions and fear and allows us to experience the film this way.
Was Kermode thinking of Pieces?
MrTomVprosser 1 week ago
It launched the career of Mcconaughey?
That's too bad, his first movie is easily his best. Should've been the one to launch his career and I'm sure it actually did.
Mrster 3 weeks ago
R. Lee Ermy was brilliant, but everything else about this film, was just shit. The original was amazing, but this, is just garbage.
MegaFilmFanatic 3 months ago
Texas eggwhisk massacre LOL
marijumanji 3 months ago
The flick Mark is trying to remember is ''Pieces'', from 1982 .
90norseman 4 months ago
This movie is a piece of shit.
Deavi783 6 months ago
the best TCM films r the original and the remake. the rest, meh...
spyrothedragon590 7 months ago
Kermode is totally right in that the original TCM had no blood. It was virtually all clever suggestion. Also, the most scary films are ones that explain nothing: to me the scariest film of all is Mulholland Drive. The scene in the diner. I'll say no more.
JLDoggard 8 months ago 2
i love mayo's bland sort of dry, uninterested humour
tarongaleela 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The remake was done very well and being a huge TCM fan, I had no problem with the remake's prequel. Both were done very well and offered information about my favorite horror villain. I'm sick of this constant bitching about films being too gratuitous and full of nothing but gore and sex when most of what horror films have always given you, is that stuff. It comes with the genre and drop the tired "they lack imagination" bullshit.
clipsryan 11 months ago
@clipsryan Actually, the early slashers like Psycho, Halloween, Black Christmas or the original TCM had very little sex or gore. They relied on narrative tension and atmosphere. Even when good horror is gory, it's using violence as a means to an end; it's not just an excuse to show people getting sliced up. Can you honestly say that's what the remake was doing?
TulseLuper 11 months ago 12
@TulseLuper Most people who grew up watching the originals, always say remakes aren't as good. It's because they're biased like the people who claim books are always better than their movie adaptations. Remake's have better acting and production in my opinion and should be alittle different considering it's a remake. Like song covers, they're suppose to provide the meat of the original and that's it.
clipsryan 11 months ago
@clipsryan Yeah, remakes always have better acting. tool.
bobbydylanio 6 months ago
@bobbydylanio In my opinion. shoe.
clipsryan 6 months ago
@clipsryan Opinions can be ignorant.
bobbydylanio 6 months ago
@bobbydylanio Unless I'm proven wrong, my opinions aren't ignorant.
clipsryan 6 months ago
@clipsryan saying all remakes have better acting seems pretty ignorant to me. nevermind
bobbydylanio 6 months ago
@bobbydylanio Maybe not all, but most and that's a fact. Who writes a comment then says nevermind?
clipsryan 6 months ago
@TulseLuper lol at that guy. I mean really? Me personally im sick of base morons believeing themselves entitled to an exposition on 'you need to deal with it' I think they're convinced it paints them as some kind of hard-ass.
phaedruslive 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TulseLuper @TulseLuper lol at that guy. I mean really? Me personally im sick of base morons believeing themselves entitled to an exposition on 'you need to deal with it' I think they're convinced it paints them as some kind of hard-ass.
phaedruslive 8 months ago
Is he talking about Pieces?
Leatherbubba 11 months ago
Texas Egg Whisk Massacre
Jcolinsol 11 months ago
Just wanted to say, I dig the name - Peter Greenaway is awesome!
TenderHistoryInRust 1 year ago
o i luv u mark
jacko12345 1 year ago
These new directors don't understand horror. They have nothing original to say. They are not disturbing. they are sick and infantile and gratuitous.
psynno1 1 year ago 15
@psynno1 Exactly - they care about horror, but that's about it.
TheDensley7 1 year ago
He's so right. These remakes/sequels show how horror movies have lost their imagination and have become about cliches, style and copying other films. The makers think that a horror film should be sadistic, chasing teenagers. There is not one moment of real terror in any of these recent films to match Hooper's original. He understand the emotions and fear and allows us to experience the film this way.
psynno1 1 year ago 6
PIECES IT WAS PIECES
roloug95 1 year ago
@roloug95 Oh yeah. J.P Simon. The man who later made Slugs the movie.
TheDensley7 1 year ago
The film is terrible, well at least visually. It looks like someone pooed on the camera, threw mud on it and then smeared it all over the lens!
EvilgidgitReturns 1 year ago 2
@EvilgidgitReturns lol so true.
purplecat1989 1 year ago
@EvilgidgitReturns you sure it was mud?
ellbo2 1 year ago
@ellbo2 Some likely pooed on the cameras and threw mud on them too.
EvilgidgitReturns 1 year ago
What was the film Kermode was trying to recollect?
Neonman78 1 year ago
I have no idea, sorry.
TulseLuper 1 year ago
Comment removed
vomitingghosts 1 year ago
@TulseLuper it's called "Pieces" I believe
Canadionfool2 3 months ago
@Neonman78
The "hidden chainsaw" movie was a cheesy early 80's horror flick called "Pieces"
djtrifecta 1 year ago 2