@al5mnd9trnksdr745bi ooh, yes, very strong point. Climate change theory crumbles before my very eyes. All the information from the science I've read, and the scientists I've listened to just got blown out of the water by your withering analysis of the situation.
i would lik to have the president impeached if he provides ANY kind of funding to this Global Warming SCAM!!!!....... If any of you guys don't think I'm telling the truth i've got SOOOO much data that proves its a scam... besides ... SINCE WHEN has CO2 been a 'pollutant'!!!!!!!!!! NEVER!!!!!! the more co2=more oxygen.. 98% of our atmpshpere is WATER VAPOR!! which is why we have blue skys!!! less than two percent is carbon.. Virtually impossible to have carbon based warming. why is mars warming?!
@FilmsareGreat (1) You say that you have a massive amount of evidence that proves that global warming is nothing more than a scam. What evidence is that? (2) Are you somehow saying that all the plants in the world are able to collect all of the CO2 that enters into the atmosphere? (3) By the way, water vapor is also a greenhouse gas. (4) No such thing as carbon-based warming? How do you think Venus is so warm? It's atmosphere is mostly CO2.
@GentlemanThunder7 "(4) No such thing as carbon-based warming? How do you think Venus is so warm? It's atmosphere is mostly CO2." Yes to everything and i will send you EVERY single bit of proof in your inbox. Now lets examine point number 4. I 100% know and agree that water vapor is a greenhouse gas. I should have specified that It is virtually impossible to have a c02 based warming on Planet EARTH. Considering that there is less than .30% caborn dioxide in our atmopshere.
@GentlemanThunder7 go ahead knock yourself out..as i said..i once belived in the scam... until i read the FACTUAL numbers and Statistics... Not Media mumbo jumbo... not from the IPCC who doesnt accept peer review. (and is strictly government) BTW the IPCC is run by a man with a PH.D In Economics so thats the Worlds best climate 'expert' ? no way no how. I showed you the numbers and sources.. i pray before you send me anything you study both sides.. be objective... as college has taught us to do
@GentlemanThunder7 carbon is the LEAST of our worries...admit that you have been HAD!!!.. i dont know about you but.. it was PRETTY cold this winter & this summer.... the Global Warming slave master Al gore said it was when c02 rises it gets hotter ... then wonder why it was so cold ... dont give me that.. extreme climate bull. since the begining of time weve had Big bad disasters only thing we lacked was media key words such as this hasnt happend since THIS!!
@GentlemanThunder7 o and by the way ... since you have done so much 'research' (i know you havent) then you would know that..Water vapor is absolutley THE MOST potent greenhouse gas in the atmosphere.. IT traps WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY more heat than carbon dioxide combined with any other green house gas.... so you fail.. global warming is a money getter... you lose.... you've been had... shattered... its virtually impossible to have an earth c02 caused warming
@FilmsareGreat (1) Well, I must say respectfully that the information you've provided me was fantastic. Many people here on YouTube don't even have actual arguments to have on these comment sections, let alone any credible, strong data that supports anything that they're saying. There is however a couple of things that I could address from the evidence you presented to me from the "whatreallyhappened" site. It was the one you suggested to me first. The article from Canada Free Press too.
97% of scientists believe in man-made global warming, and the 3% that don't are less qualified than the others according the the most prestigious scientific group in the world, the National Academy of Sciences. In capitalism, everyone is looking to make a buck on something, but that doesn't change the fact of global warming. It also doesn't change the fact that the Energy industry, mainly the oil industry is the biggest and most profitable in the world.
Also, the overpopulation scare is so 1970's. That's not a serious concern anymore, and "eugenics" doesn't have significant sway among environmentalists in general.
The main point of this video seems to be that if some unsavory person attaches themselves to a movement, that discredits the whole movement and its claims.
Where do you get those numbers from? If you're gonna make something up, at least make sure it's credible.
And no one is claiming global warming isn't real, what people are refuting is that the global warming is caused by humans. Also, as you say the oil industry is the most powerful and profitable in the world, what prevents them from buying the green energy producers and getting even more money?
@TheAnarchanon First they tried to say cigarettes didn't cause lung cancer. Then they admitted, it might've caused some cases of cancer, but don't worry because its so rare you weren't affected. Then they admitted millions of people died of lung cancer because of smoking cigarettes, but really, it was all those people's own faults, the big tobacco companies were giving the people what they wanted.
The oil industry isn't the only one saying that CO2 isn't causing the warming, there are many respected scientists who either aren't convinced or deny that co2 is the cause of the warming.
Car industry is very big as well, what if they set up the global warming scheme to sell more green cars?
Cause car sales have increased because of the whole "live greener" attitude. And not just cars, many industries are profiting from it
@TheAnarchanon With global warming, we aren't talking about a few million dead. We're talking about the survival of the species. We have to stop it before we're looking into the abyss and the oil companies are saying 'we were just giving people what they wanted.'
The numbers come from a study by the United States National Academy of Sciences, probably the most prestigious group of scientists in the world.
You are seriously retarded if you think global warming is threat to the human species. This planet is billions of years old, you think this is the first time that it warms up? You do know that Antarctica used to have plant life and a jungle too, right?
Please link me to a RECENT study proving CO2 is causing the planets warming (2010-2011)
@TheAnarchanon You are scientifically illiterate. Many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of species have been killed by climate change in the past. Humans are far more vulnerable than the other species that were died as humans need unimaginably more resources to continue living like we currently are.
But that's my point: climate change is inevitable, it isn't caused by humans. This planet is almost 6 billion years old, thinking that humans who have only been around a fraction of this time, could cause such major changes to its climate is just silly without definitive proof. Less then 400 years ago we had a small ice age on this planet and there used to be plant life on Antarctica: Climate will change whether we like it or not
@TheAnarchanon I'm sure there are studies that provide evidence humans cause climate change, but if you likewise demanded a study "proving" existence of the theory of gravity that has been published in 2010 or 2011, you probably wouldn't find it. Would that disprove the theory of gravity?
But the theory of gravity is still proven everyday: I don't fall into the air and neither do you.
The studies that prove humans cause climate change have all been published years ago, ever since the scandal with Phil Jones, one of the leading climate researchers using very shoddy data to prove AGW, no studies have been made proving AGW. It just shows that there was never certainty that humans where causing it and there never will be
@TheAnarchanon Again you prove your scientific illiteracy. It would be useful to audit a introductory science course at a local college- much more useful than getting all your information from a blog or from the Coal/Oil industry.
@TheAnarchanon You do not understand the theory of gravity. The downward motion we feel towards the ground is an observation, not a theory. The theory of gravity claims that the downward pull towards the ground is the mass of the earth pulling the mass of our bodies. Also, the theory of gravity says that it is the same force that pulls us towards the earth that keeps the planets in orbit around the sun, and this force behaves in the same exact way in both circumstances.
@TheAnarchanon If you didn't understand the theory of gravity (hopefully now you do), why do you feel entitled to argue against the scientific community on climate change?
Besides all that, climate change is just an accepted fact by the scientific community. The only arguments left to be had, no matter what the hell Rush Limbaugh and other high-school dropouts want to say, is to what *degree* humans caused climate change, if we can undo the damage, and what affects the damage will have.
No no no no no. See, what you are discussing is besides the point. Climate change is real, thats true, but it isn't caused by the CO2 humans put out.
This amount is less than 0.5% of the total amount put out by nature itself. So, do tell me how this 0.3% can be the direct cause of the climate change?
@TheAnarchanon Last year a team of scientists from Stanford led by Noah Diffenbaugh published a study claiming that climate change will cause record heat waves.
As I speak, all 254 counties in Texas have been deemed state natural disaster areas. The 13 of the southwestern states are seeing droughts and heat unseen in the 80 years since the dust bowl.
@TheAnarchanon I could keep quoting climate change studies proven right and the fact that the entire scientific community affirms anthropogenic climate change, but you don't care about facts. You know you're a conservative, probably your friends and family are conservatives, and you just know that conservatives don't believe in whatever scientists and other educated people (i.e. "liberals") say about climate change. You need to reevaluate *why* you believe the things you do for humanities' sake.
"the entire scientific community affirms anthropogenic climate change"
Lies, again, just like the 97% you pulled out your ass earlier.
I'm not even American, so I'm no conservative and neither are my friends or family. And it's really funny how you see conservatives and educated people as two different sides. Typical American brainwashing: Either it's black or it's white
The reason I don't believe AGW to be a fact is because there are too many things that don't add up.
@TheAnarchanon The National Science Foundation in the USA, the most prestigious scientific community in the world conducted an official survey on anthropogenic-climate change. Approximately 99% of members of the NSF believed in anthropogenic-climate change, and the few who didn't were less qualified than the others who did. Go to *any* reputable college or university in the USA, Canada, West Europe, Japan or Australia. You will not find one science dept. that doesn't believe AGW.
1st: you claimed it was 99% of the scientific community, now it turns out it's just one group in America you were referencing to, so you failed already
2nd: the survey was done among 1372 scientists, that's practically nothing. The third link I give you is an article to a study done by 650 scientists who deny global warming is man made. So bye bye to the 97%
3rd:some links proving you wrong: all of these are tinyurl dot com /, add the following after the /
@TheAnarchanon Sometimes things *are* black and white. No physicist doesn't believe in the theory of gravity- that's pretty black and white. Do you disbelieve the theory of gravity too?
If AGW doesn't "add up" its probably because you've been reading a political blog by another scientifically illiterate pugilist with a political line to follow.
And the black and white thing was referring to your believes that if you don't believe in AGW you must be republican and not gone to college. That's a pretty short sighted view.
This has nothing to do with politics, but with science. And since there is still a big amount of debate abut whether or not AGW is real, I think it's pretty safe to say that you have no solid arguments to base your belief on.
You can't prove something isn't the cause or something isn't happening.
Right now, 40% of scientists doubt AGW. FORTY PERCENT DOUBT AGW. (januari 2011)
Seems a long way removed from your survey among 1372 scientists(2010), with no actual data on how many returned the survey or from what branch of science they were from
@TheAnarchanon Green energy is labor intensive, ie it gives workers more power, and workers are a threat to profits. Oil is a capital-intensive industry, therefore it enables much fatter profits. Also, no corporation- let alone the biggest industry in the world- wants to take a leap of faith only to find themselves falling down a cliff. All businesses are afraid of radically altering their business model. Just look at record labels and movie companies. They rather sue us than move an inch.
And I don't know how it is where you live, but in my country green energy costs more than regular energy, so the higher cost thing is bogus as well, if it costs more, we pay more
And green energy isn't labor intensive at all: since it's renewable energy it pays for itself. And no one says they have to abandon the oil industry all together. They can (and will) have both.
Your entire oil industry conspiracy theory makes no sense at all.
Well now that I know I am a pinhead I better listen. FUCK NO! That voice is so fucking annoying. I would rather listen to finger nails on a chalk board.
If you want people to listen, stop the dramatics and just talk with a normal voice and minus electronics. If not - CLICK. Too many other things to watch that are not so annoying.
Now, do YOU get the REAL message I am giving you?! :-)
Watch the Horizon episode "Science Under Attack" for the truth about "Climategate"; if you think anthropogenic climate change is not occuring you are completely retarded.
the most ironic part of this video is it consistently says we are being lied to or mislead, and yet whoever made it did t bother going into detail on any of the claims. typical right wing fear mongering. you say the left is trying to manipulate you, and yet you can't recognize that the right is not only trying but succeeding
he has a point, the climate thing went from a scientific curiosity to an environmental movement, to a mechanism where corporations and governments dreamed up ways of making money by peddling "alternative" energy schemes that don't work and taxing ordinary citizens, of which none of the profits would go to real alternate sources of energy, nor to prepare for or mitigate any harm climate change would do........
Amazing visuals. Great music. I love your channel, but I was profoundly disappointed by this video. Your comment that we now have absolute certainty proving global warming is a hoax is terribly shortsighted. I have no idea what your final point is.. I watched the video twice and I don't get it. What side of history do I want to be on? The one that fights to stay alive and fix climate change before we asphyxiate ourselves or fry the planet.. but your telling me its all bogus?
i can remember about 2004 it was south pole supposed bo be melting because of an ozone hole. and now it's global warming melting north pole, and the ozone hole on the south pole is forgotten long ago.
and in the 70s and in the 90s a bit it was a new ice age.
Regardless of whether or not global warming is a scam, it is our responsibility to make sure that we clean up after ourselves. Why should we have to walk down the street and see plastic packets/bottles piled against walls and gutters? All the fag butts all over the ground? Why do we throw them on the ground? What I'm saying is all this pollution cannot do any good for the environment, only harm. Wake up people and take some responsibility for all the harm you have done to our home.
Interesting... as I read the comments I see a definite trend: Those that are AWG proponents use ad hominen attacks and character assassination in their comments. Those that are not AGW proponents generally use valid scientific arguments. I've noticed that nasty comments are generally the trait of Democrats--I don't know why they have to stoop to such nastiness unless.... unless... unless they have no valid arguments.
@VincentVonGoat I thought the speech was overwritten and riddled with doublespeak. Never forget to mention "the children".
"Cooperation and unity", yeah sure, as long as we do what you AGW liars say.
"the message was parrotted, not argued"? You cretins will NOT argue it!
This video's message is basically "the world won't do what we say, they merely take is as one point of view and move on". What is this supposed to be, the environmentalists' "mein kampf"?
are you replying to me? I'm confused. I wrote a supportive comment to this video (at least I thought the "thumbs up", Favorite, & comment were in support...). In reading (some of) your comments it would seem we're in agreement on "man-made" global warming.. so I'm not sure what you're getting at. I was genuinely asking for a transcript of this audio.
@attietewd What more worrying is that you have such a short memory and have forgotten that Bush tried to supress the NASA lead scientist findings that humans are the most likely cause of recent rapid warming. I didn't see you complaining then?
As a scientist I am shocked by the people who do not understand that "proof" is not a scientific term. Scientists do not prove a theory....ever! Theories change and adapt to new evidence and data, if they dont adapt they are no better than religion. What we can do in science is try to disprove a theory. Humans are the most likely explanation for recent rapid warming (2009 was the 2nd warmest year on modern record topping the warmest decade on record: NASA) and this remains to be disproved!
From what I've read on many of these posts, it appears that a large majority of folks who think the Climate Crisis is a hoax focus on their concern that it is an effort towards a government take over. So, my question is this; Is the concern about a government take over so important that it does not matter to people whether there really is a Climate Crisis or not?
You seem to have dismissed the entire climatology community because of the actions of a few, which by the way was misrepresented by the media. look up potholer54's videos on the cru emails. Have you dismissed all the NASA, NOAA, WMO and other sdata too despites them having nothing to do with the alledged data you talk about?
@sharkblubber Referring to these crooks as "a few" is misleading. They are (were) the leading climatologists. Only the tip of the iceberg rather than a few.
@zaimur Before you go further have you watched potholer54's excellent video on the CRU emails. it puts it all into a rational persepective, and cuts out the fox news media crap.
@sharkblubber the CRU emails only hint at the corruption and anti-West agenda being pursued by the bureaucrats in charge of funding. Hardly a word is spoken about pollution from Russia or China, for example. The fact that man's CO2 is a footnote to a footnote to climate change is never mentioned by these creeps.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
As a scientist I am shocked by the people who do not understand that "proof" is not a scientific term. Scientists do not prove a theory....ever! Theories change and adapt to new evidence and data, if they dont adapt they are no better than religion. What we can do in science is try to disprove a theory. Humans are the most likely explanation for recent rapid warming (2009 was the 2nd warmest year on modern record topping the warmest decade on record: NASA) and this remains to be disproved!
Not only proof isn't a scientific term. Consensus isn't a scientific term too. Theories do not simply change due to new evidence and data, they must be replaced by new theories when fasified hereby. The 2nd warmest year on modern record according to NASA? NASA was founded in 1958.
@zaimur NASA was the replacement for the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) which goes back to 1910's. By the way do you have disproof of AGW as the most likely explanation for a primary driver of recent rapid warming?
I have disproof of all the anti AGW theories regurgitated by AGW skeptics, ranging from blaming the sun to aliens etc.
Climate change proof ?? Is simple. If u are a city boy u will never see when a change is made, if u are a country boy maybe u live on straight contact with the nature, and u will see the changes. Global warming,carbon dioxide, all this thing are arguable,and maybe scams. But the destroy of forests with the immediate consequences is not arguable. The cementification of the land, has is consequences.Now are floods not rains with dry months,in north Europe. Is not Africa. And many other ....
Hmm, according to the writing styles of some of the viewer comments here, it seems that the same person has several usernames, and has decided to post using these same different names, what a scam. There is ZERO scientific concrete proof that says mankind is causing a global climate change. PERIOD!! Al Gore has increased his net worth by over $100 million since the year 2000 because of this global warming scam. For every 1 green job created in Spain, 2 people have been laid off.
@buzztester You named him! Al Gore has been trolling these YouTube forums posing using different logins so he can try to dispel the truth against his arguments. He has so little support left that he has to take on some of the work himself.
@buzztester Here's proof. Power plants, cars, etc. produce Carbon Dioxide. Carbon Dioxide is greenhouse gas which increases the temperature of the globe. What am I missing here?
@troyverb Of course CO2 SHOULD increase the earths temps, but its effect is almost immeasurable. Don't depend on manmade computer models with an agenda. Have a look at the actual MEASURED DATA. There is nothing out of the ordinary there. The most informative documentary I have found on here is on my channel. Watch Henrick Svensmark 5 part series....just watch it see what makes more sense to you.
@buzztester seriously.. are you retarded? I mean if it turns out your right and we switch to greener more efficient technologies, what is the downside? Oh no! Al Gore made a profit.... but if your wrong about all of this... and we don't change our wasteful habits and in 50-100 years our children have to live with the consequences (drought, famine, and wars over fresh water) , I hope you remember your comment posted here. and feel like the logical person you are.. *sarcasm
According to Deborah Cory Barnes, author of The Money and Connections Behind Al Gores Carbon Crusade, Al Gore started Generation Investment Management (GIM) with co founder Hank Paulson. Remember him? Yes, he was the Treasury Secretary. Guess what? Yes, he is also the former CEO of Goldman Sachs. (Didnt Goldman Sachs just get billions in Federal Reserve pledges, bailouts, and or Tarp?)
Another scam to fleece working & middleclass people out of more of their money
Lost it at 3 min Really, we all know 'hide the decline' referred to those errant tree ring proxies What did they hide it with? actual measurements, novel eh? Well novel for the denial movement ... polar ice been increasing? they can't tell the difference between area and volume Tree ring proxies suppressed? The papers WERE accepted and discussed by the IPCC East Anglia? Well there is USGS, GISS, NASA, CSIRO, BOM, WMO and scientists from 35 NAS's Oh, and this guy has disguised his voice 1/10
Thanks for saving me the trouble of deconstructing the bullshit in this video. You summed it up quite nicely.
I agreed with much of what he said in the first half, especially at 1:25 ... but then at 3:00 his credibility fell like waterfront property during a bursting credit bubble. Accusations of "elitism" are the refuge of those without the tools to understand complex ideas.
the entire solarsystem is NOT "warming" - dreamer....ok maybe on fox noise but there is absolutely NO evidence for. And thats all well known. These are so called strawman arguments and they are created, spreaded and funded by corporate-PR campaings.
The sun activity and radiation is continously highly observed. Do you really BELIEVE that the worldwide climate science just forgets the sun? Just askin´...
You Germans have a reputation for going with bad theories/leaders( 1914-1918, 1940-1945 ring a bell?) So unless you got some link to a RECENT study proving they aren't, I'd shut up and pay the gasbill
@TheAnarchanon first off, the solar system is an OPEN system, as in energy can enter and leave with relatively no resistance.. earth is a CLOSED system so energy can be trapped within our atmosphere.. therefore any changes in the solar system can be accounted for in climate data.... dumbass
Yes, and by solar system warming I didn't mean the planets who also have a closed atmosphere within the solar system, but literally the solar system itself. Lay of the drugs and maybe you'll be able to think like a normal person
@TheAnarchanon so your suggesting that the nearly empty space of our solar system heating up, which is measure in hundredth of degrees, is somehow causing the rapid heating of our atmosphere.. hmmm you clearly have knowledge of the physics of energy and light.
@TheAnarchanon you have really proven your ignorance.. does it make you angry to be outsmarted by a stoner? would you care explaining why the temperature on jupiter and mars has any effect of our planet? I mean jesus your an idiot if you think our atmosphere and those of other planets act the same way towards light particles.
Yes, I am the idiot, not you who doesn't understand sarcasm and types "YOUR an idiot"
If all planets in our solarsystem are warming up at a very similar scale as our planet is, there has to be a connection and since my cars exhaust gases don't reach Jupiter, it has to be something else. I wonder what all planets in our galaxy have in common? (Here's a hint:It's big, round and warm)
@TheAnarchanon I'd be willing to bet that the only fact you can produce to back up your absolutely ridiculous claims, is the facts that you didnt learn any of this in a text book, did you? lol
@TheAnarchanon wow.. there you go. i think any more interaction with you is absolutely futile, as you seem to discredit books or text books as a thing for an "underage school kid" why am i bothering to debate you when you clearly get your "facts" from any source that will re-enforce your retarded beliefs.
Did you even bother checking the link? It has links to nasa and other major scientific sites which clearly prove that the entire solar system is warming. You really shouldn't get all your knowledge out of school books, do your own research
@TheAnarchanon it has links to NASA and "other" scientific sites does it? well then I guess if I went to NASA official website I would find boatloads of information on how there is no proof of global warming... and yet, it the complete opposite! NASA may have studies showing our solar system warming, but if you took time to read thos pesky science txt books in high school, you might realize that temperature changes in a vacuum are minuscule, and do not affect Earth in any significant way.
But this isn't about "a vacuum", you idiot. This is about the atmosphere on other planets, not just the temperature in space. And you clearly didn't even bother to visit the link and look at the other sites, so why do I even bother replying to some stupid school kid who thinks he knows shit, when he doesn't?
@TheAnarchanon if you knew anything at all about scientific theory, experiments, or even basic principles, you would know that it is our atmosphere that regulates Earth temperature... and if there is excess greenhouse gases then it will trap more of the sunlight instead of reflecting it back into space... (greenhouse effect). this has been demonstrated in experiments many times over, and the results can be replicated, therefore it is a true theory. unlike the hogwash you believe
Ofcourse, but what if there is MORE sunlight all of a sudden, caused by let's say the sun getting hotter, wouldn't that be a viable explanation as to why it's getting warmer just as well? And when you look at other planets in our solar system (mars, pluto, jupiter,...) the same thing is happening. So, does earths atmosphere regulate the temperature on Mars as well?
@TheAnarchanon this is what your not quit grasping.. where are we getting the data on the temperature of Mars and Jupiter? from a handful of satellites orbiting these planets. you think this data will be as accurate enough to predict drastic climate changes over hundred of years like we have on Earth? or course not...
@TheAnarchanon we know that the sun is getting hotter, and we know that it also gets cooler as well... we have accounted for this in the data you genius, and the Earth is still heating up much faster than predicted... this will get exponentially worse over time... look at the facts and you will be proven wrong (if you can figure out what exponentially means LOL).. you damn drop out, keep using Wikipedia as your main source of knowledge
All other planets in our solar system are warming at about the same rate (nasa data confirms this) how is our planets warming caused by human activity and the warming on other planets caused by just the sun?
@TheAnarchanon the solar system isnt warming. it doesnt work like that. different planets have different properties. Mars is 95% CO2 and it iswithin the greenzone of our star. Yet its colder than a witches tit there. Also to say Mars ice caps are melting is wrong. Mars wobbles wildly. On earth when we wobble it changes one hemisphere from summer to winter
Likewise global warmng alarmists cant use Venus as a model of runaway greenhouse. It rotates once ever 240 or so days. Cooking the surface
Of course there are differences in other planets atmospheres, which can have different effects on the climate. But if every planet is experiencing similar warming as Earth does, there has to be a common factor: in this case the sun would be a more likely candidate than factory on Earth.
Venus can't be used as a model for runaway greenhouse effect because the warming there was caused by evaporated water and not CO2. The co2 came after the warming of the planet.
@Spacemarine420 You are whining about .3 degrees Celsius. You can warm your hands more then that by rubbing them together. Do you even know if this measurement is within the experimental error of your monitoring devices? We don't even use the same equipment over a period of 50 years so the precision of this data is off as well.
@TheAnarchanon another uninformed comment out of so many ignorant comments on youtube. show me the peer reviewed scientific publications that supports your claim or shut up. the sun is just one factor that regulates the earths climate. just because some people are exploiting the issue doesn't mean that its false. what you are preaching is homicidal stupidity
Go to the NASA site and look up the info yourself, lazy cunt. Every planet in our solar system has had an increase in temperature, there is no need to peer review that, it's simple temperature readings.
Now explain to me how something that happens in our entire solar system is caused by driving a car on earth and not by the sun? Also, give me some RECENT studies proving manmade CO2 is causing the warming. And by recent i mean 2010-2011
@TheAnarchanon you are making the claim that anthropogenic climate change is false. i will ask you again, please state the peer reviewed scientific journal to back your claim. i get the impression you have been watching too many misinforming youtube vids.
What study? You can't prove a negative, you idiot. It's impossible to prove that CO2 isn't causing the warming, same way it's impossible to prove there isn't a god: in science, you can't prove a negative.
And you are correct, the sun is just one factor, but it's the biggest one of all, just like on all other planets in our solar system.
And I've yet to see studies from 2010-2011 claiming CO2 causes the warming, so as they say: i'll show you mine if you show me yours
@TheAnarchanon why do you have have to resort to calling me an idiot? feeling threatened? its not very nice you know. you are making the claim and have yet to show me anything with substance. i will ask you again, show me the sources you have to back your claim or shut up
You are an idiot, it's a simple deduction I can make from reading your posts.
And again: it's on the freaking NASA site: almost all planets in our solar system have undergone similar warming as earth has. Is reading too hard for you?
@TheAnarchanon you can't even give me a source for your claim that anthropogenic climate change is false you fucking ignorant twat. stop lecturing me on the truth when you don't know your arse from your elbow. its clear that the planet is in an ecological crisis and morons like you, who pick their info up from unreliable sources think they know it all. what you are doing is very dangerous. please stop doing it for everyone's sake
There is no crisis, what's happening is natural. We came out of a small ice age a few hundred years ago, their will possibly be another one coming soon (solarwinds will reduce earths temp by around 0.5°C) effectively canceling out the warming that has happened so far.
Scientists from the ICU where found to have used bad science, and nothing is even mentioned anywhere anymore about AGW, why do you keep insisting it to be true?
@TheAnarchanon your tinyurl link has no sources. and your calling me an idiot, think etc. i have given you something from a reliable source at least. you can't give me anything. absolutely nothing. until i see reliable sources leave me alone
@gavhof i got the link to work thanks. i hate to be as stubborn as you but this does not prove GW is false. the studies are years old and again solar activity is only one factor. i have never claimed to know the truth as you have and lets face it: you don't know it either. thats the point i have being trying to make in the conversation. and thanks for all the name calling. its a real show of character. i am finished with this. bye
It's not meant to show AGW as being false, it just shows that there are more possibilities than just human made CO2. What I hate is that AGW is being spread as an absolute truth, which it isn't.
You're point from the start was that by showing people other possibilities, I was going to destroy the world. And I do apologize for the name calling, but after 200 people coming up with the same arguments over and over it gets kinda tedious.
@TheAnarchanon i have sent you a link to the nasa website which refutes the notion that the solar system is warming. you were making claims when you didn't even check any sources. i sincerely hope this is a lesson for you. don't believe everything you hear in the media/youtube. always check the sources. peace
The link you send leads to a question answered by one person. And he gives a one sentence answer (it's not true) without any evidence proving the opposite, before going on about something completely different.
I took the time to get you this link: it has several links to NASA studies (a study is actual evidence, instead of just saying "no, it's not true" with no evidence to back up the claim)
@bernzeppi hide the decline referred to the data showing a temp * decline *.
Look it up. So fun to see attempts made to spin it.
Polar ice increases and decreases, while it was in decline AGW freaks used it, they ignore it now. Tree ring proxies were cherry picked for the few that show temp increase. The scam was world wide due to the nature of the gov't bureacrats behind it.
@bernzeppi I mos def DID read the emails, not all of them but anyone who reads those and doesn't see these guys as conniving lying cheaters is DAFT.
If you're smelling something it must be you, the 'net doesn't transmit that info.
The ice caps are NOT "in decline", they advance and retreat over decades... in any event you would expect a very slight decline since the Earth is still coming out of the last ice age... BTW ice ages kill, warm periods promote life.
@bernzeppi there will always be ice in the arctic, we have your hilarious assertion that it will ice ice free. FYI there was less ice in the 1930's that there is now.
You AGW clowns have no historic perspective, your hysterical fearmongering is too fun.
I don't know if it's the choice of soundtrack or the overall production, but this vid is one of the best videos I've seen on YT in over two years. It reminds me of the interludes in Consolidated's 'Friendly Fascism' (back in the day). I wish everyone in 'Amerikkka' were forced [via Ludovico technique] to watch this. Awesome. 5/fav'd/FB'd,et ceteras
One of UN's top climatologists: "The World is possibly headed into a 'temporary' 30 year cold period, (little ice age?) after which it will resume warming"... like the end of an Ice Age does?
UN is just an extension of a very totalitarian hidden government. They are only promoting the agenda which is a total world domination. I am talking this from a personal experience with UN ways as a citizen of a UN bordering nation. I can experience UN buying away chops of my country almost daily. The only thing that is temporary in this story is the UN itself.
The environmental movement has been hijacked & its true goals & purposes subverted.
Read Jerry Kammer's fine article "Strategic Negligence" on the hijacking of one of the top environmental organizations
If supposed Environmental organizations who are supposed to be protecting wildlife & the environment, are not addressing the #1 factor for environmental degradation &
wildlife declines (and GHG production) that means they are FRAUDS
January 8th, it snowed in the northern mexican states of Chihuahua, Coahuila and Nuevo Leon and down south in Mexico state and higher altitudes surrounding Mexico City.
yeah, its cold as anything here on the central plateau, a median high of 60°F today, yesterday was colder at 58°F,...don't remember where, but actually we're in the beginning of a new Ice Age,...global warmin', another scam, but still we do need to care for mother earth.
Who are you to talk about an easy life if you believe in AGW so much do your bit. Turn your computer off so you cant post on you tube dont turn your lights on when it gets dark turn your heat off in cold weather stop cooking food and finaly stop breathing
Some very interesting imagery. I enjoyed the time lapse of the airport at night. Very cool.
Vansit84 2 weeks ago
@al5mnd9trnksdr745bi ooh, yes, very strong point. Climate change theory crumbles before my very eyes. All the information from the science I've read, and the scientists I've listened to just got blown out of the water by your withering analysis of the situation.
neutronbomb1000 4 months ago
This is pure garbage--don't bother to watch!!!!
Lalabolton777 6 months ago
This is a disguised James Corbett voice.
CameronsContrick 7 months ago
i would lik to have the president impeached if he provides ANY kind of funding to this Global Warming SCAM!!!!....... If any of you guys don't think I'm telling the truth i've got SOOOO much data that proves its a scam... besides ... SINCE WHEN has CO2 been a 'pollutant'!!!!!!!!!! NEVER!!!!!! the more co2=more oxygen.. 98% of our atmpshpere is WATER VAPOR!! which is why we have blue skys!!! less than two percent is carbon.. Virtually impossible to have carbon based warming. why is mars warming?!
FilmsareGreat 7 months ago
@FilmsareGreat (1) You say that you have a massive amount of evidence that proves that global warming is nothing more than a scam. What evidence is that? (2) Are you somehow saying that all the plants in the world are able to collect all of the CO2 that enters into the atmosphere? (3) By the way, water vapor is also a greenhouse gas. (4) No such thing as carbon-based warming? How do you think Venus is so warm? It's atmosphere is mostly CO2.
GentlemanThunder7 7 months ago
@GentlemanThunder7 "(4) No such thing as carbon-based warming? How do you think Venus is so warm? It's atmosphere is mostly CO2." Yes to everything and i will send you EVERY single bit of proof in your inbox. Now lets examine point number 4. I 100% know and agree that water vapor is a greenhouse gas. I should have specified that It is virtually impossible to have a c02 based warming on Planet EARTH. Considering that there is less than .30% caborn dioxide in our atmopshere.
FilmsareGreat 7 months ago
@FilmsareGreat (1, cont.) There's a lot of evidence I have to address to. Would you like me to move through step-by-step?
GentlemanThunder7 7 months ago
@GentlemanThunder7 go ahead knock yourself out..as i said..i once belived in the scam... until i read the FACTUAL numbers and Statistics... Not Media mumbo jumbo... not from the IPCC who doesnt accept peer review. (and is strictly government) BTW the IPCC is run by a man with a PH.D In Economics so thats the Worlds best climate 'expert' ? no way no how. I showed you the numbers and sources.. i pray before you send me anything you study both sides.. be objective... as college has taught us to do
FilmsareGreat 7 months ago
@GentlemanThunder7 carbon is the LEAST of our worries...admit that you have been HAD!!!.. i dont know about you but.. it was PRETTY cold this winter & this summer.... the Global Warming slave master Al gore said it was when c02 rises it gets hotter ... then wonder why it was so cold ... dont give me that.. extreme climate bull. since the begining of time weve had Big bad disasters only thing we lacked was media key words such as this hasnt happend since THIS!!
FilmsareGreat 7 months ago
@GentlemanThunder7 o and by the way ... since you have done so much 'research' (i know you havent) then you would know that..Water vapor is absolutley THE MOST potent greenhouse gas in the atmosphere.. IT traps WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY more heat than carbon dioxide combined with any other green house gas.... so you fail.. global warming is a money getter... you lose.... you've been had... shattered... its virtually impossible to have an earth c02 caused warming
FilmsareGreat 7 months ago
@FilmsareGreat (1) Well, I must say respectfully that the information you've provided me was fantastic. Many people here on YouTube don't even have actual arguments to have on these comment sections, let alone any credible, strong data that supports anything that they're saying. There is however a couple of things that I could address from the evidence you presented to me from the "whatreallyhappened" site. It was the one you suggested to me first. The article from Canada Free Press too.
GentlemanThunder7 7 months ago
97% of scientists believe in man-made global warming, and the 3% that don't are less qualified than the others according the the most prestigious scientific group in the world, the National Academy of Sciences. In capitalism, everyone is looking to make a buck on something, but that doesn't change the fact of global warming. It also doesn't change the fact that the Energy industry, mainly the oil industry is the biggest and most profitable in the world.
spartan2600 8 months ago
Also, the overpopulation scare is so 1970's. That's not a serious concern anymore, and "eugenics" doesn't have significant sway among environmentalists in general.
The main point of this video seems to be that if some unsavory person attaches themselves to a movement, that discredits the whole movement and its claims.
spartan2600 8 months ago
@spartan2600
Where do you get those numbers from? If you're gonna make something up, at least make sure it's credible.
And no one is claiming global warming isn't real, what people are refuting is that the global warming is caused by humans. Also, as you say the oil industry is the most powerful and profitable in the world, what prevents them from buying the green energy producers and getting even more money?
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
@TheAnarchanon First they tried to say cigarettes didn't cause lung cancer. Then they admitted, it might've caused some cases of cancer, but don't worry because its so rare you weren't affected. Then they admitted millions of people died of lung cancer because of smoking cigarettes, but really, it was all those people's own faults, the big tobacco companies were giving the people what they wanted.
spartan2600 7 months ago
@spartan2600
What's your point?
The oil industry isn't the only one saying that CO2 isn't causing the warming, there are many respected scientists who either aren't convinced or deny that co2 is the cause of the warming.
Car industry is very big as well, what if they set up the global warming scheme to sell more green cars?
Cause car sales have increased because of the whole "live greener" attitude. And not just cars, many industries are profiting from it
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
@TheAnarchanon With global warming, we aren't talking about a few million dead. We're talking about the survival of the species. We have to stop it before we're looking into the abyss and the oil companies are saying 'we were just giving people what they wanted.'
The numbers come from a study by the United States National Academy of Sciences, probably the most prestigious group of scientists in the world.
spartan2600 7 months ago
@spartan2600
You are seriously retarded if you think global warming is threat to the human species. This planet is billions of years old, you think this is the first time that it warms up? You do know that Antarctica used to have plant life and a jungle too, right?
Please link me to a RECENT study proving CO2 is causing the planets warming (2010-2011)
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
@TheAnarchanon You are scientifically illiterate. Many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of species have been killed by climate change in the past. Humans are far more vulnerable than the other species that were died as humans need unimaginably more resources to continue living like we currently are.
spartan2600 6 months ago
@spartan2600
But that's my point: climate change is inevitable, it isn't caused by humans. This planet is almost 6 billion years old, thinking that humans who have only been around a fraction of this time, could cause such major changes to its climate is just silly without definitive proof. Less then 400 years ago we had a small ice age on this planet and there used to be plant life on Antarctica: Climate will change whether we like it or not
TheAnarchanon 6 months ago
@TheAnarchanon I'm sure there are studies that provide evidence humans cause climate change, but if you likewise demanded a study "proving" existence of the theory of gravity that has been published in 2010 or 2011, you probably wouldn't find it. Would that disprove the theory of gravity?
spartan2600 6 months ago
@spartan2600
But the theory of gravity is still proven everyday: I don't fall into the air and neither do you.
The studies that prove humans cause climate change have all been published years ago, ever since the scandal with Phil Jones, one of the leading climate researchers using very shoddy data to prove AGW, no studies have been made proving AGW. It just shows that there was never certainty that humans where causing it and there never will be
TheAnarchanon 6 months ago
@TheAnarchanon Again you prove your scientific illiteracy. It would be useful to audit a introductory science course at a local college- much more useful than getting all your information from a blog or from the Coal/Oil industry.
spartan2600 6 months ago
@spartan2600
What are you even trying to say?
Instead of providing studies and facts, you start questioning my education and intelligence.
Another typical AGW-clown move: if you can't prove the person wrong, use personal attacks.
This is just pathetic
TheAnarchanon 6 months ago
@TheAnarchanon You do not understand the theory of gravity. The downward motion we feel towards the ground is an observation, not a theory. The theory of gravity claims that the downward pull towards the ground is the mass of the earth pulling the mass of our bodies. Also, the theory of gravity says that it is the same force that pulls us towards the earth that keeps the planets in orbit around the sun, and this force behaves in the same exact way in both circumstances.
spartan2600 6 months ago
@spartan2600
I completely understand the theory of gravity and as I said: it's observed everyday.
What are you trying to get at here?
TheAnarchanon 6 months ago
@TheAnarchanon If you didn't understand the theory of gravity (hopefully now you do), why do you feel entitled to argue against the scientific community on climate change?
Besides all that, climate change is just an accepted fact by the scientific community. The only arguments left to be had, no matter what the hell Rush Limbaugh and other high-school dropouts want to say, is to what *degree* humans caused climate change, if we can undo the damage, and what affects the damage will have.
spartan2600 6 months ago
@spartan2600
No no no no no. See, what you are discussing is besides the point. Climate change is real, thats true, but it isn't caused by the CO2 humans put out.
This amount is less than 0.5% of the total amount put out by nature itself. So, do tell me how this 0.3% can be the direct cause of the climate change?
TheAnarchanon 6 months ago
@TheAnarchanon Last year a team of scientists from Stanford led by Noah Diffenbaugh published a study claiming that climate change will cause record heat waves.
As I speak, all 254 counties in Texas have been deemed state natural disaster areas. The 13 of the southwestern states are seeing droughts and heat unseen in the 80 years since the dust bowl.
spartan2600 6 months ago
@spartan2600
And over here in Europe we had one of the coldest winters in 60 years. This proves nothing. You need to think in millenia, not centuries or decades.
This planet is 5 billion years old, 10000 years means nothing.
You do know that 400 years ago we went through a small ice age, right?
You do know that because of solar flares the average temp. on earth will drop 0.5°C, right?
You do realize that all of that means nothing, if you hold it against the 5 billion years this planet exists?
TheAnarchanon 6 months ago
@TheAnarchanon I could keep quoting climate change studies proven right and the fact that the entire scientific community affirms anthropogenic climate change, but you don't care about facts. You know you're a conservative, probably your friends and family are conservatives, and you just know that conservatives don't believe in whatever scientists and other educated people (i.e. "liberals") say about climate change. You need to reevaluate *why* you believe the things you do for humanities' sake.
spartan2600 6 months ago
@spartan2600
"the entire scientific community affirms anthropogenic climate change"
Lies, again, just like the 97% you pulled out your ass earlier.
I'm not even American, so I'm no conservative and neither are my friends or family. And it's really funny how you see conservatives and educated people as two different sides. Typical American brainwashing: Either it's black or it's white
The reason I don't believe AGW to be a fact is because there are too many things that don't add up.
TheAnarchanon 6 months ago
@TheAnarchanon The National Science Foundation in the USA, the most prestigious scientific community in the world conducted an official survey on anthropogenic-climate change. Approximately 99% of members of the NSF believed in anthropogenic-climate change, and the few who didn't were less qualified than the others who did. Go to *any* reputable college or university in the USA, Canada, West Europe, Japan or Australia. You will not find one science dept. that doesn't believe AGW.
spartan2600 5 months ago
@spartan2600
1st: you claimed it was 99% of the scientific community, now it turns out it's just one group in America you were referencing to, so you failed already
2nd: the survey was done among 1372 scientists, that's practically nothing. The third link I give you is an article to a study done by 650 scientists who deny global warming is man made. So bye bye to the 97%
3rd:some links proving you wrong: all of these are tinyurl dot com /, add the following after the /
36qkkh
4p9rjyb
3qpvee4
TheAnarchanon 5 months ago
@TheAnarchanon Sometimes things *are* black and white. No physicist doesn't believe in the theory of gravity- that's pretty black and white. Do you disbelieve the theory of gravity too?
If AGW doesn't "add up" its probably because you've been reading a political blog by another scientifically illiterate pugilist with a political line to follow.
spartan2600 5 months ago
@spartan2600
No, it doesn't "add up" because it's not real.
And the black and white thing was referring to your believes that if you don't believe in AGW you must be republican and not gone to college. That's a pretty short sighted view.
This has nothing to do with politics, but with science. And since there is still a big amount of debate abut whether or not AGW is real, I think it's pretty safe to say that you have no solid arguments to base your belief on.
TheAnarchanon 5 months ago
@TheAnarchanon There isn't one peer-reviewed study the has challenged AGW or doesn't take AGW for granted.
spartan2600 5 months ago
@spartan2600
BECAUSE YOU CAN'T PROVE A NEGATIVE!
You can't prove something isn't the cause or something isn't happening.
Right now, 40% of scientists doubt AGW. FORTY PERCENT DOUBT AGW. (januari 2011)
Seems a long way removed from your survey among 1372 scientists(2010), with no actual data on how many returned the survey or from what branch of science they were from
TheAnarchanon 5 months ago
@TheAnarchanon 40% of scientists doubt AGW?!!! Bollocks!!! Provide your reference, please.
neutronbomb1000 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@neutronbomb1000
tinyurl com slash 38str7p
I know, it's quite surprising how you hear almost nothing about this fact on the news
TheAnarchanon 4 months ago
@TheAnarchanon Green energy is labor intensive, ie it gives workers more power, and workers are a threat to profits. Oil is a capital-intensive industry, therefore it enables much fatter profits. Also, no corporation- let alone the biggest industry in the world- wants to take a leap of faith only to find themselves falling down a cliff. All businesses are afraid of radically altering their business model. Just look at record labels and movie companies. They rather sue us than move an inch.
spartan2600 7 months ago
@spartan2600
Where did you get the 93% from?
And I don't know how it is where you live, but in my country green energy costs more than regular energy, so the higher cost thing is bogus as well, if it costs more, we pay more
And green energy isn't labor intensive at all: since it's renewable energy it pays for itself. And no one says they have to abandon the oil industry all together. They can (and will) have both.
Your entire oil industry conspiracy theory makes no sense at all.
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
Well now that I know I am a pinhead I better listen. FUCK NO! That voice is so fucking annoying. I would rather listen to finger nails on a chalk board.
If you want people to listen, stop the dramatics and just talk with a normal voice and minus electronics. If not - CLICK. Too many other things to watch that are not so annoying.
Now, do YOU get the REAL message I am giving you?! :-)
HuskerSeaofRed 8 months ago
stupid voice, didn't make it past 35 seconds.
HuskerSeaofRed 8 months ago
@HuskerSeaofRed Thats because you are a pin head and can't get the real message. You had better wake up.
lebiew 8 months ago
Watch the Horizon episode "Science Under Attack" for the truth about "Climategate"; if you think anthropogenic climate change is not occuring you are completely retarded.
niriop 11 months ago
When these global eliteists have taken everything there is to be taken from us, then what's next? I bet it won't be a friendly poker game.
yajneslo 11 months ago
the most ironic part of this video is it consistently says we are being lied to or mislead, and yet whoever made it did t bother going into detail on any of the claims. typical right wing fear mongering. you say the left is trying to manipulate you, and yet you can't recognize that the right is not only trying but succeeding
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
he has a point, the climate thing went from a scientific curiosity to an environmental movement, to a mechanism where corporations and governments dreamed up ways of making money by peddling "alternative" energy schemes that don't work and taxing ordinary citizens, of which none of the profits would go to real alternate sources of energy, nor to prepare for or mitigate any harm climate change would do........
Darthbelal 1 year ago
What a rubbish video. All I can say is Climategate my arse!
watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg&feature=related
watch?v=uXesBhYwdRo&feature=related
watch?v=P70SlEqX7oY
watch?v=eJFZ88EH6i4&feature=related
watch?v=5WvasALL-hw
Richard482 1 year ago
its corbetts voice... a well known denier-campaigner
irresponsible scumbags
aerobique 1 year ago
the movement has nothing to do with c02, its just justification for public support for a tax on petroleum products (cap and trade).
brian39900 1 year ago
Face it, was all lies. Once the truth was told, your little plan for world domination is falling apart.
Auggie56 1 year ago
Yes, AGW is a scam being fed to the world by the Al Goreleone crime syndicate. However, why does rageunderground use the Anonymous voice?
harbar3000 1 year ago
@harbar3000 Because the Anon voice is kinda cool.
759009946576 1 year ago
Amazing visuals. Great music. I love your channel, but I was profoundly disappointed by this video. Your comment that we now have absolute certainty proving global warming is a hoax is terribly shortsighted. I have no idea what your final point is.. I watched the video twice and I don't get it. What side of history do I want to be on? The one that fights to stay alive and fix climate change before we asphyxiate ourselves or fry the planet.. but your telling me its all bogus?
bizybozo 1 year ago
i can remember about 2004 it was south pole supposed bo be melting because of an ozone hole. and now it's global warming melting north pole, and the ozone hole on the south pole is forgotten long ago.
and in the 70s and in the 90s a bit it was a new ice age.
GloriousOtaku 1 year ago
@GloriousOtaku The majority of scientists in the 70's didn't say we were heading for a new ice age. Thats another myth
watch?v=EU_AtHkB4Ms&feature=related
watch?v=iG-hCar-GTo
Richard482 1 year ago
Regardless of whether or not global warming is a scam, it is our responsibility to make sure that we clean up after ourselves. Why should we have to walk down the street and see plastic packets/bottles piled against walls and gutters? All the fag butts all over the ground? Why do we throw them on the ground? What I'm saying is all this pollution cannot do any good for the environment, only harm. Wake up people and take some responsibility for all the harm you have done to our home.
Time4TruthDOTorg 1 year ago
Comment removed
jcpat777 1 year ago
@jcpat777 What did I say about carbon tax? I didn't mention either word.
Time4TruthDOTorg 1 year ago
@Time4TruthDOTorg sorry, mind was elsewhere.
jcpat777 1 year ago
Great video, should become viral!
strongbowist 1 year ago
the visuals are stunning
GazMysticism 1 year ago
Stunning footage using the mark of artificial beauty against the mark of natural organic beauty.
SteeAsp 1 year ago
from the original corbett report
RobinDropping 1 year ago
Interesting... as I read the comments I see a definite trend: Those that are AWG proponents use ad hominen attacks and character assassination in their comments. Those that are not AGW proponents generally use valid scientific arguments. I've noticed that nasty comments are generally the trait of Democrats--I don't know why they have to stoop to such nastiness unless.... unless... unless they have no valid arguments.
Rockyspoon09 1 year ago 4
@Rockyspoon09 I disagree. Many of the nasty comments that I've read through the year argumentating here on YouTube have all been from Republicans.
GentlemanThunder7 7 months ago
You know what, buzztester? You think you know it all--you're so sure of yourself and your opinions. But you know what??? You're absolutely right!
Rockyspoon09 1 year ago
still one of the most powerful messages on YT! If you have a transcript of this speech, I'd love a copy!
VincentVonGoat 1 year ago
@VincentVonGoat I thought the speech was overwritten and riddled with doublespeak. Never forget to mention "the children".
"Cooperation and unity", yeah sure, as long as we do what you AGW liars say.
"the message was parrotted, not argued"? You cretins will NOT argue it!
This video's message is basically "the world won't do what we say, they merely take is as one point of view and move on". What is this supposed to be, the environmentalists' "mein kampf"?
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
are you replying to me? I'm confused. I wrote a supportive comment to this video (at least I thought the "thumbs up", Favorite, & comment were in support...). In reading (some of) your comments it would seem we're in agreement on "man-made" global warming.. so I'm not sure what you're getting at. I was genuinely asking for a transcript of this audio.
VincentVonGoat 1 year ago
Great video, wish it had more views, great job
wildone838 1 year ago
Excellent video; both the message and the cinematography.
climatereview 1 year ago
good video man but the voice is a little hard to listen to
samdiego 1 year ago
Any environmental movement that does not include a population control element, is only blow'n smoke.
Sleeko11 1 year ago
Obamas Science Czar John Holdren involved in unwinding Climategate scandal By Dr. Tim Ball and Judi McLeod Tuesday, November 24, 2009
whats really scary this happened three months ago and we are just finding out about it...whats up with that?
attietewd 1 year ago
@attietewd What more worrying is that you have such a short memory and have forgotten that Bush tried to supress the NASA lead scientist findings that humans are the most likely cause of recent rapid warming. I didn't see you complaining then?
sharkblubber 1 year ago
@sharkblubber NASA has been shown to be just as full of shit as the IPCC and the CRU.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As a scientist I am shocked by the people who do not understand that "proof" is not a scientific term. Scientists do not prove a theory....ever! Theories change and adapt to new evidence and data, if they dont adapt they are no better than religion. What we can do in science is try to disprove a theory. Humans are the most likely explanation for recent rapid warming (2009 was the 2nd warmest year on modern record topping the warmest decade on record: NASA) and this remains to be disproved!
sharkblubber 1 year ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
From what I've read on many of these posts, it appears that a large majority of folks who think the Climate Crisis is a hoax focus on their concern that it is an effort towards a government take over. So, my question is this; Is the concern about a government take over so important that it does not matter to people whether there really is a Climate Crisis or not?
Staranand 1 year ago 3
You seem to have dismissed the entire climatology community because of the actions of a few, which by the way was misrepresented by the media. look up potholer54's videos on the cru emails. Have you dismissed all the NASA, NOAA, WMO and other sdata too despites them having nothing to do with the alledged data you talk about?
sharkblubber 1 year ago
@sharkblubber Referring to these crooks as "a few" is misleading. They are (were) the leading climatologists. Only the tip of the iceberg rather than a few.
zaimur 1 year ago 2
@zaimur Before you go further have you watched potholer54's excellent video on the CRU emails. it puts it all into a rational persepective, and cuts out the fox news media crap.
sharkblubber 1 year ago
@sharkblubber the CRU emails only hint at the corruption and anti-West agenda being pursued by the bureaucrats in charge of funding. Hardly a word is spoken about pollution from Russia or China, for example. The fact that man's CO2 is a footnote to a footnote to climate change is never mentioned by these creeps.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
GW is a lie to take our money
BellasLabPuppies 1 year ago 3
Fact is-there is NO global warming at all.
shirl5044 1 year ago
Not according to those who know better i.e. Hadley centre, met office, NASA, NOAA, the royal society, the NAS, AAAS, WMO etc
sharkblubber 1 year ago
Nicely said, and done...
jollyranchhand 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
As a scientist I am shocked by the people who do not understand that "proof" is not a scientific term. Scientists do not prove a theory....ever! Theories change and adapt to new evidence and data, if they dont adapt they are no better than religion. What we can do in science is try to disprove a theory. Humans are the most likely explanation for recent rapid warming (2009 was the 2nd warmest year on modern record topping the warmest decade on record: NASA) and this remains to be disproved!
sharkblubber 1 year ago
Not only proof isn't a scientific term. Consensus isn't a scientific term too. Theories do not simply change due to new evidence and data, they must be replaced by new theories when fasified hereby. The 2nd warmest year on modern record according to NASA? NASA was founded in 1958.
zaimur 1 year ago
@zaimur NASA was the replacement for the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) which goes back to 1910's. By the way do you have disproof of AGW as the most likely explanation for a primary driver of recent rapid warming?
I have disproof of all the anti AGW theories regurgitated by AGW skeptics, ranging from blaming the sun to aliens etc.
sharkblubber 1 year ago
Too true
soupdragon42 1 year ago
Climate change proof ?? Is simple. If u are a city boy u will never see when a change is made, if u are a country boy maybe u live on straight contact with the nature, and u will see the changes. Global warming,carbon dioxide, all this thing are arguable,and maybe scams. But the destroy of forests with the immediate consequences is not arguable. The cementification of the land, has is consequences.Now are floods not rains with dry months,in north Europe. Is not Africa. And many other ....
xplanetopplstupid 2 years ago
Hmm, according to the writing styles of some of the viewer comments here, it seems that the same person has several usernames, and has decided to post using these same different names, what a scam. There is ZERO scientific concrete proof that says mankind is causing a global climate change. PERIOD!! Al Gore has increased his net worth by over $100 million since the year 2000 because of this global warming scam. For every 1 green job created in Spain, 2 people have been laid off.
buzztester 2 years ago 34
This has been flagged as spam show
Mann:
"..The key thing is making sure the series are vertically aligned in a reasonable
way. I had been using the entire 20th century, but in the case of Keith's,
we need to align the first half of the 20th century w/ the corresponding mean
values of the other series, due to the late 20th century decline."
ww w. eastangliaemails. com/emails. php?eid=136&filename=938018124 . txt
MrOllyK 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Briffa:
".. For the record, I do believe that the proxy data do show unusually
warm conditions in recent decades. I am not sure that this unusual warming
is so clear in the summer responsive data. I believe that the recent warmth
was probably matched about 1000 years ago. I do not believe that global
mean annual temperatures have simply cooled progressively over thousands of
years as Mike appears to.."
ww w. eastangliaemails. com/emails. php?eid=136&filename=938018124 . txt
MrOllyK 1 year ago
@buzztester You named him! Al Gore has been trolling these YouTube forums posing using different logins so he can try to dispel the truth against his arguments. He has so little support left that he has to take on some of the work himself.
tomperanteau 1 year ago
@buzztester
stupid liar
aerobique 1 year ago
@buzztester Here's proof. Power plants, cars, etc. produce Carbon Dioxide. Carbon Dioxide is greenhouse gas which increases the temperature of the globe. What am I missing here?
Stop listening to Fox News and politicians.
troyverb 1 year ago
@troyverb Of course CO2 SHOULD increase the earths temps, but its effect is almost immeasurable. Don't depend on manmade computer models with an agenda. Have a look at the actual MEASURED DATA. There is nothing out of the ordinary there. The most informative documentary I have found on here is on my channel. Watch Henrick Svensmark 5 part series....just watch it see what makes more sense to you.
TheKickerboy99 1 year ago
@buzztester seriously.. are you retarded? I mean if it turns out your right and we switch to greener more efficient technologies, what is the downside? Oh no! Al Gore made a profit.... but if your wrong about all of this... and we don't change our wasteful habits and in 50-100 years our children have to live with the consequences (drought, famine, and wars over fresh water) , I hope you remember your comment posted here. and feel like the logical person you are.. *sarcasm
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
The global warming scam passed by Congress. Goldman Sachs is in the middle of it, as usual a potential trillion dollar sure thing.
And Former Vice President Al Gore who will profit from the cap-and-trade plan through his company, Generation Investment Management,
Gore is joined by three former Goldman Sachs heads in their carbon offsets business.
RomeoMD25 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
wfmk6 2 years ago
good stuff.
thatstheguy07 2 years ago
Al Gore Carbon Credit Lord
According to Deborah Cory Barnes, author of The Money and Connections Behind Al Gores Carbon Crusade, Al Gore started Generation Investment Management (GIM) with co founder Hank Paulson. Remember him? Yes, he was the Treasury Secretary. Guess what? Yes, he is also the former CEO of Goldman Sachs. (Didnt Goldman Sachs just get billions in Federal Reserve pledges, bailouts, and or Tarp?)
Another scam to fleece working & middleclass people out of more of their money
Thisawareness 2 years ago 3
This doesn't fit with the zeitgeist movent.
frounkman 2 years ago
bernzeppi 2 years ago
@bernzeppi
I was rapt until that crap voice
That crap voice ALWAYS means crap content
Emotion-charged and rationality-free
If only it made compost
beachcomber2008 2 years ago
Yeh I agree
it seems thoughtful at the beginning,
nice frame accumulation effects... yep, yep
but it's style over substance.
"Club of Rome, eugenics, elitist, cull, population, single minded obsession (see the pattern?) climate gate... we now know"
We now know climate gate is a crock
I urge everyone to actually read those emails,
Any honest reading of the letters can't conclude a conspiracy.
Sound track reminds me a of a really bad christian band from the 80's sans the "read the bible" lyric
bernzeppi 2 years ago 2
@bernzeppi
Thanks for saving me the trouble of deconstructing the bullshit in this video. You summed it up quite nicely.
I agreed with much of what he said in the first half, especially at 1:25 ... but then at 3:00 his credibility fell like waterfront property during a bursting credit bubble. Accusations of "elitism" are the refuge of those without the tools to understand complex ideas.
watch?v=P70SlEqX7oY
substanti8 2 years ago 2
How do explain that our entire solarsystem is warming?
Caused by me driving my car?
Or might it be the sun, the thing that has been regulating most of earths temperature for billions of years?
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago 18
@TheAnarchanon
the entire solarsystem is NOT "warming" - dreamer....ok maybe on fox noise but there is absolutely NO evidence for. And thats all well known. These are so called strawman arguments and they are created, spreaded and funded by corporate-PR campaings.
The sun activity and radiation is continously highly observed. Do you really BELIEVE that the worldwide climate science just forgets the sun? Just askin´...
aerobique 1 year ago
@aerobique
Yes it is, fruitcake.
BTW, killed anymore Jews lately, german fag?
You Germans have a reputation for going with bad theories/leaders( 1914-1918, 1940-1945 ring a bell?) So unless you got some link to a RECENT study proving they aren't, I'd shut up and pay the gasbill
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon first off, the solar system is an OPEN system, as in energy can enter and leave with relatively no resistance.. earth is a CLOSED system so energy can be trapped within our atmosphere.. therefore any changes in the solar system can be accounted for in climate data.... dumbass
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
@Spacemarine420
Yes, and by solar system warming I didn't mean the planets who also have a closed atmosphere within the solar system, but literally the solar system itself. Lay of the drugs and maybe you'll be able to think like a normal person
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon so your suggesting that the nearly empty space of our solar system heating up, which is measure in hundredth of degrees, is somehow causing the rapid heating of our atmosphere.. hmmm you clearly have knowledge of the physics of energy and light.
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
@Spacemarine420
Fuck you are stupid. Not the solar system, the planets in it, hence the entire solarsystem. And I'm not suggesting it, it's a fact.
The drugs is getting to your brain, spacemarine420, or have you always been this slow?
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon you have really proven your ignorance.. does it make you angry to be outsmarted by a stoner? would you care explaining why the temperature on jupiter and mars has any effect of our planet? I mean jesus your an idiot if you think our atmosphere and those of other planets act the same way towards light particles.
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
@Spacemarine420
Yes, I am the idiot, not you who doesn't understand sarcasm and types "YOUR an idiot"
If all planets in our solarsystem are warming up at a very similar scale as our planet is, there has to be a connection and since my cars exhaust gases don't reach Jupiter, it has to be something else. I wonder what all planets in our galaxy have in common? (Here's a hint:It's big, round and warm)
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon I'd be willing to bet that the only fact you can produce to back up your absolutely ridiculous claims, is the facts that you didnt learn any of this in a text book, did you? lol
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
@Spacemarine420
Of course not, I'm not an underage school kid, why would I still spend time reading text books?
Here's a link (with further links and brief descriptions) to an interesting site:
tinyurl com / 33xv53y
I'm sure you know how the tinyurl thing works, right?
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon wow.. there you go. i think any more interaction with you is absolutely futile, as you seem to discredit books or text books as a thing for an "underage school kid" why am i bothering to debate you when you clearly get your "facts" from any source that will re-enforce your retarded beliefs.
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
@Spacemarine420
Did you even bother checking the link? It has links to nasa and other major scientific sites which clearly prove that the entire solar system is warming. You really shouldn't get all your knowledge out of school books, do your own research
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon it has links to NASA and "other" scientific sites does it? well then I guess if I went to NASA official website I would find boatloads of information on how there is no proof of global warming... and yet, it the complete opposite! NASA may have studies showing our solar system warming, but if you took time to read thos pesky science txt books in high school, you might realize that temperature changes in a vacuum are minuscule, and do not affect Earth in any significant way.
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
@Spacemarine420
But this isn't about "a vacuum", you idiot. This is about the atmosphere on other planets, not just the temperature in space. And you clearly didn't even bother to visit the link and look at the other sites, so why do I even bother replying to some stupid school kid who thinks he knows shit, when he doesn't?
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon if you knew anything at all about scientific theory, experiments, or even basic principles, you would know that it is our atmosphere that regulates Earth temperature... and if there is excess greenhouse gases then it will trap more of the sunlight instead of reflecting it back into space... (greenhouse effect). this has been demonstrated in experiments many times over, and the results can be replicated, therefore it is a true theory. unlike the hogwash you believe
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
@Spacemarine420
Ofcourse, but what if there is MORE sunlight all of a sudden, caused by let's say the sun getting hotter, wouldn't that be a viable explanation as to why it's getting warmer just as well? And when you look at other planets in our solar system (mars, pluto, jupiter,...) the same thing is happening. So, does earths atmosphere regulate the temperature on Mars as well?
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon this is what your not quit grasping.. where are we getting the data on the temperature of Mars and Jupiter? from a handful of satellites orbiting these planets. you think this data will be as accurate enough to predict drastic climate changes over hundred of years like we have on Earth? or course not...
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon we know that the sun is getting hotter, and we know that it also gets cooler as well... we have accounted for this in the data you genius, and the Earth is still heating up much faster than predicted... this will get exponentially worse over time... look at the facts and you will be proven wrong (if you can figure out what exponentially means LOL).. you damn drop out, keep using Wikipedia as your main source of knowledge
Spacemarine420 1 year ago
@Spacemarine420
Fuck, you are dumb.
All other planets in our solar system are warming at about the same rate (nasa data confirms this) how is our planets warming caused by human activity and the warming on other planets caused by just the sun?
Explain why the other planets are warming too
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon the solar system isnt warming. it doesnt work like that. different planets have different properties. Mars is 95% CO2 and it iswithin the greenzone of our star. Yet its colder than a witches tit there. Also to say Mars ice caps are melting is wrong. Mars wobbles wildly. On earth when we wobble it changes one hemisphere from summer to winter
Likewise global warmng alarmists cant use Venus as a model of runaway greenhouse. It rotates once ever 240 or so days. Cooking the surface
ORACLE063 1 year ago
@ORACLE063
Of course there are differences in other planets atmospheres, which can have different effects on the climate. But if every planet is experiencing similar warming as Earth does, there has to be a common factor: in this case the sun would be a more likely candidate than factory on Earth.
Venus can't be used as a model for runaway greenhouse effect because the warming there was caused by evaporated water and not CO2. The co2 came after the warming of the planet.
TheAnarchanon 1 year ago
@Spacemarine420 You are whining about .3 degrees Celsius. You can warm your hands more then that by rubbing them together. Do you even know if this measurement is within the experimental error of your monitoring devices? We don't even use the same equipment over a period of 50 years so the precision of this data is off as well.
thebestsumoeva 1 year ago
@TheAnarchanon another uninformed comment out of so many ignorant comments on youtube. show me the peer reviewed scientific publications that supports your claim or shut up. the sun is just one factor that regulates the earths climate. just because some people are exploiting the issue doesn't mean that its false. what you are preaching is homicidal stupidity
gavhof 7 months ago
@gavhof
Go to the NASA site and look up the info yourself, lazy cunt. Every planet in our solar system has had an increase in temperature, there is no need to peer review that, it's simple temperature readings.
Now explain to me how something that happens in our entire solar system is caused by driving a car on earth and not by the sun? Also, give me some RECENT studies proving manmade CO2 is causing the warming. And by recent i mean 2010-2011
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheAnarchanon you are making the claim that anthropogenic climate change is false. i will ask you again, please state the peer reviewed scientific journal to back your claim. i get the impression you have been watching too many misinforming youtube vids.
gavhof 7 months ago
@gavhof
What study? You can't prove a negative, you idiot. It's impossible to prove that CO2 isn't causing the warming, same way it's impossible to prove there isn't a god: in science, you can't prove a negative.
And you are correct, the sun is just one factor, but it's the biggest one of all, just like on all other planets in our solar system.
And I've yet to see studies from 2010-2011 claiming CO2 causes the warming, so as they say: i'll show you mine if you show me yours
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
@TheAnarchanon why do you have have to resort to calling me an idiot? feeling threatened? its not very nice you know. you are making the claim and have yet to show me anything with substance. i will ask you again, show me the sources you have to back your claim or shut up
gavhof 7 months ago
@gavhof
You are an idiot, it's a simple deduction I can make from reading your posts.
And again: it's on the freaking NASA site: almost all planets in our solar system have undergone similar warming as earth has. Is reading too hard for you?
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
@TheAnarchanon you can't even give me a source for your claim that anthropogenic climate change is false you fucking ignorant twat. stop lecturing me on the truth when you don't know your arse from your elbow. its clear that the planet is in an ecological crisis and morons like you, who pick their info up from unreliable sources think they know it all. what you are doing is very dangerous. please stop doing it for everyone's sake
gavhof 7 months ago
@gavhof
YOU CAN'T PROVE A NEGATIVE, YOU THICK CUNT.
There is no crisis, what's happening is natural. We came out of a small ice age a few hundred years ago, their will possibly be another one coming soon (solarwinds will reduce earths temp by around 0.5°C) effectively canceling out the warming that has happened so far.
Scientists from the ICU where found to have used bad science, and nothing is even mentioned anywhere anymore about AGW, why do you keep insisting it to be true?
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
@TheAnarchanon your tinyurl link has no sources. and your calling me an idiot, think etc. i have given you something from a reliable source at least. you can't give me anything. absolutely nothing. until i see reliable sources leave me alone
gavhof 7 months ago
@gavhof i got the link to work thanks. i hate to be as stubborn as you but this does not prove GW is false. the studies are years old and again solar activity is only one factor. i have never claimed to know the truth as you have and lets face it: you don't know it either. thats the point i have being trying to make in the conversation. and thanks for all the name calling. its a real show of character. i am finished with this. bye
gavhof 7 months ago
@gavhof
It's not meant to show AGW as being false, it just shows that there are more possibilities than just human made CO2. What I hate is that AGW is being spread as an absolute truth, which it isn't.
You're point from the start was that by showing people other possibilities, I was going to destroy the world. And I do apologize for the name calling, but after 200 people coming up with the same arguments over and over it gets kinda tedious.
Goodbye, and please keep looking out for truth
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
@gavhof It has several further links to NASA articles and studies (yes, actual studies) click on them, if that isn't too much trouble
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
@TheAnarchanon i have sent you a link to the nasa website which refutes the notion that the solar system is warming. you were making claims when you didn't even check any sources. i sincerely hope this is a lesson for you. don't believe everything you hear in the media/youtube. always check the sources. peace
gavhof 7 months ago
@gavhof
The link you send leads to a question answered by one person. And he gives a one sentence answer (it's not true) without any evidence proving the opposite, before going on about something completely different.
I took the time to get you this link: it has several links to NASA studies (a study is actual evidence, instead of just saying "no, it's not true" with no evidence to back up the claim)
tinyurl com / 33xv53y
Remove the spaces and ad a .
TheAnarchanon 7 months ago
@bernzeppi hide the decline referred to the data showing a temp * decline *.
Look it up. So fun to see attempts made to spin it.
Polar ice increases and decreases, while it was in decline AGW freaks used it, they ignore it now. Tree ring proxies were cherry picked for the few that show temp increase. The scam was world wide due to the nature of the gov't bureacrats behind it.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
Duhh,
You clearly didn't read the email.
So you are talking out of somebody else's ass... a Simpleton with very bad breath
. abc . net . au/unleashed/stories/s2862717. htm
Why would I ignore the ice caps? They are in serious decline.
If only the ice was as thick as you
abcnews . go . com/Technology/weather-climate-cold-snap-global-warming/story?id=9505043
Your a joke!
bernzeppi 1 year ago
@bernzeppi I mos def DID read the emails, not all of them but anyone who reads those and doesn't see these guys as conniving lying cheaters is DAFT.
If you're smelling something it must be you, the 'net doesn't transmit that info.
The ice caps are NOT "in decline", they advance and retreat over decades... in any event you would expect a very slight decline since the Earth is still coming out of the last ice age... BTW ice ages kill, warm periods promote life.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman "I mos def DID read the emails,"
Didn't expect you to read all of 'em but I would expect you would have stopped at a bit that that was damming. Which bit was that?
(my guess is you read the quotes on FOXnews... heh heh)
You ARE entitled to your own opinion but NOT entitled to your own facts
The north pole summer will be ice free by 2020, some say as early as 2012... two years!
Even then of course, you'n your clan will declare GW over every winter
bernzeppi 1 year ago
@bernzeppi your own opinion is NOT fact, the N pole will not be ice free at all, you're just parrotting AGW BS
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman Your stealing my lines!
Your paranoia is not evidence of anything.
Anyhow, I have it on record that you are certain that there will be no ice free north pole during summer in the next ten years... yes?
bernzeppi 1 year ago
@bernzeppi there will always be ice in the arctic, we have your hilarious assertion that it will ice ice free. FYI there was less ice in the 1930's that there is now.
You AGW clowns have no historic perspective, your hysterical fearmongering is too fun.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago 6
5 stars! Great video! What cool that time lapse is!
belvedere106 2 years ago
I don't know if it's the choice of soundtrack or the overall production, but this vid is one of the best videos I've seen on YT in over two years. It reminds me of the interludes in Consolidated's 'Friendly Fascism' (back in the day). I wish everyone in 'Amerikkka' were forced [via Ludovico technique] to watch this. Awesome. 5/fav'd/FB'd,et ceteras
VincentVonGoat 2 years ago
One of UN's top climatologists: "The World is possibly headed into a 'temporary' 30 year cold period, (little ice age?) after which it will resume warming"... like the end of an Ice Age does?
Blogengezer 2 years ago
UN is just an extension of a very totalitarian hidden government. They are only promoting the agenda which is a total world domination. I am talking this from a personal experience with UN ways as a citizen of a UN bordering nation. I can experience UN buying away chops of my country almost daily. The only thing that is temporary in this story is the UN itself.
vsurlan 2 years ago
This is pretty cool. But the narrator isn't fooling anyone. He's definitely Canadian :).
nyer82 2 years ago
The environmental movement has been hijacked & its true goals & purposes subverted.
Read Jerry Kammer's fine article "Strategic Negligence" on the hijacking of one of the top environmental organizations
If supposed Environmental organizations who are supposed to be protecting wildlife & the environment, are not addressing the #1 factor for environmental degradation &
wildlife declines (and GHG production) that means they are FRAUDS
Thisawareness 2 years ago
January 8th, it snowed in the northern mexican states of Chihuahua, Coahuila and Nuevo Leon and down south in Mexico state and higher altitudes surrounding Mexico City.
qualqui 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
January 8th 2009 It snowed in Florida today...Proof that global warming is a scam.
Kikkins 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yeah, its cold as anything here on the central plateau, a median high of 60°F today, yesterday was colder at 58°F,...don't remember where, but actually we're in the beginning of a new Ice Age,...global warmin', another scam, but still we do need to care for mother earth.
qualqui 2 years ago
Al gore is a kook ..out for $
but i am for protecting the environment ..
respect life ..
get off the grid ..
talltreehill7 2 years ago
Who are you to talk about an easy life if you believe in AGW so much do your bit. Turn your computer off so you cant post on you tube dont turn your lights on when it gets dark turn your heat off in cold weather stop cooking food and finaly stop breathing
agey01 2 years ago 2