@alamidblackcat Probably from the pregnancies, you have to understand the radiation damages your dna. So when the dna out of wich you make a baby is damaged you get a miscarriage or a deformed child. You cant get deformed if you receive a dose of radiation.
Because if done properly, Nuclear power is the safest and cleanest power in the world, but if done too hastily as the Chernobyl reactor had been done, then the mutations radiation causes is the most destructive thing in the world, you just have to remember that no matter where they put the Chernobyl NPP the radiation would still have spread over Europe and knowing that should mean you take all the care in the world to build your plants safer and better then before
i just don't understand why shall a big country keep the nuclear reactor near the residents why don't they just build it in the desert away form the city its that simple.
Man am I so glad this didn't happen on three mile island I live litterally miles away, I more then likely wouldn't of been here today. R.I.P. all who died in Chernobyl.
I noticed a lot of bickering on this comment channel. There is no need for it. Watch the video "The Truth and Chernobyl" listin to the prof. and do what he asks you to, I did. "It should be truthful accurate information." He said. Watch it. Oh and by the way there are great videos on magnetic motors, homeade hydrogen generators and e-bikes on here. There is no "energy crisis" it's a fraud.
i cried when i first saw this on Fusco's site... the aftermath of chernobyl is without a doubt horrible. on a side note... dosborn05 when you said "so called cleanest producer of energy" i have to disagree with you. nuclear power IS a clean form of energy, it just has horrible side affects if something goes wrong...
Is that to say its the best by default? what about solar energy; if it stops working it just sits there, not even broken glass. The waste created is extremely dangerous and is radioactive for millions of years and there is a 99% success rate which isnt good enough
Because the Americans did and they thought the US would invade. Which is what we thought they were going to do. So I guess the real answer is fear. Which is ironic because that is what they cause.
@dosborn05 they build a nuclear reactor for a cheap source of energy and did not take care of it because and the reactor blew, you are thinking of a nuclear bomb an not a reactor, and its the other way around
Chernobyl is in Ukraine, which was then part of the USSR. That is not exactly Russia. USSR had nuclear power for civil use and of course for military, in case USA would drop nuclear bombs on Moscow, like they did on Hiroshima and Nakasaki. And.. "stupid fucking russian".. is this what they tought you in Hitlerjugend?
I wasn't trying to go that far in depth. I was saying why would a country like the UK or France, for example, make a huge deal out of Chernobyl while at the same time be considering building a new reactor? No country that has nuclear reactors and plans to possibly build new ones will be willing to do much about Chernobyl. Doing so would draw attention to it and probably cause the public to demand that their respective government not build a new reactor and find ways to close the current ones.
Are you asking me or making a point? Consider your choice of words. Panic is from the Greek panikos emanating from Pan, the Greek god of fields and flocks - also considered the source of irrational fear. It all depends on whether you think the fear of nuclear power is irrational or not.
Excellent. According to the Chernobyl Forum, an international organisation of scientific bodies including a number of UN agencies, deaths directly attributable to radiation from Chernobyl currently stand at 56 - less than the weekly death toll on Britain's roads.
The Chernobyl Forum obviously has its own agenda. Governments now see Nuclear Power as the only "sane" alternative for the coming energy crisis. Well that's real insanity for you.
Unfortunately, no major government will confront the problems from Chernobyl until something 'better' than nuclear power is found. Why would they want to cause a panic over the so called cleanest producer of energy?
it makes you think how fuck up the world really is that all we can do is worry about our little problems when the the fact is we don't problems compared to the all poor people who were effcted by the chernobyl.
were these conditions from pregnancies that got affected or just strictly from the chemicals?
alamidblackcat 10 months ago
@alamidblackcat Probably from the pregnancies, you have to understand the radiation damages your dna. So when the dna out of wich you make a baby is damaged you get a miscarriage or a deformed child. You cant get deformed if you receive a dose of radiation.
xMendy22 9 months ago
All this pain from an unauthorized experiment...
Videophilmer 1 year ago
An entire city, devastated. It makes me feel horrible. so many people died.
Gkartdriver 2 years ago
my god
Luch212 4 years ago 8
Because if done properly, Nuclear power is the safest and cleanest power in the world, but if done too hastily as the Chernobyl reactor had been done, then the mutations radiation causes is the most destructive thing in the world, you just have to remember that no matter where they put the Chernobyl NPP the radiation would still have spread over Europe and knowing that should mean you take all the care in the world to build your plants safer and better then before
LordDreskar 4 years ago
i just don't understand why shall a big country keep the nuclear reactor near the residents why don't they just build it in the desert away form the city its that simple.
NOBLEHAWK888 4 years ago
is paul fusco still alive
weaselfighter 4 years ago
Man am I so glad this didn't happen on three mile island I live litterally miles away, I more then likely wouldn't of been here today. R.I.P. all who died in Chernobyl.
kdc29 4 years ago
It this made by the same Paul Fusco who created Alf?
Dane2 4 years ago
I noticed a lot of bickering on this comment channel. There is no need for it. Watch the video "The Truth and Chernobyl" listin to the prof. and do what he asks you to, I did. "It should be truthful accurate information." He said. Watch it. Oh and by the way there are great videos on magnetic motors, homeade hydrogen generators and e-bikes on here. There is no "energy crisis" it's a fraud.
analyzingfunny 4 years ago
this guy just made this up.....about ten people have posted this video
jjbeggs 4 years ago
fucking communists and their raggedy reactor
starrynightz 4 years ago
America had a raggety reactor that would have caused the same amount of devastation. It was on Three Mile Island. We're that close.
Ozarkmadness56 4 years ago 9
Maldito que alza las armas contra el pueblo
Jainner 4 years ago
damned nuclearizm !!!!
Psikopat1905 4 years ago
i cried when i first saw this on Fusco's site... the aftermath of chernobyl is without a doubt horrible. on a side note... dosborn05 when you said "so called cleanest producer of energy" i have to disagree with you. nuclear power IS a clean form of energy, it just has horrible side affects if something goes wrong...
Eve16 4 years ago
I agree. It is cleanest so long as there are no problems.
dosborn05 4 years ago
The problem is there will ALWAYS be human error. Things go wrong, that's how life is.
melamia71 4 years ago
That's human kind's built in self destruct.
Ozarkmadness56 4 years ago
Is that to say its the best by default? what about solar energy; if it stops working it just sits there, not even broken glass. The waste created is extremely dangerous and is radioactive for millions of years and there is a 99% success rate which isnt good enough
Rosky12 4 years ago 2
stupid fucking russian, why those stupid peoples have nuclear power.
clorko 4 years ago
Because the Americans did and they thought the US would invade. Which is what we thought they were going to do. So I guess the real answer is fear. Which is ironic because that is what they cause.
dosborn05 4 years ago 3
@dosborn05 they build a nuclear reactor for a cheap source of energy and did not take care of it because and the reactor blew, you are thinking of a nuclear bomb an not a reactor, and its the other way around
gangsta287 11 months ago
Chernobyl is in Ukraine, which was then part of the USSR. That is not exactly Russia. USSR had nuclear power for civil use and of course for military, in case USA would drop nuclear bombs on Moscow, like they did on Hiroshima and Nakasaki. And.. "stupid fucking russian".. is this what they tought you in Hitlerjugend?
Saint713 4 years ago
those bombs weren't nuclear at Hiroshima, they were atomic, big difference.
internallabrynth 4 years ago
every country has nuclear technology dumb fuck fuking retard so stfu this can happen to any power plant idiot... go learn geaography btw
hujiamon 4 years ago
every country does NOT have nuclear technology, at least not enough of it to produce weapons out of it.
internallabrynth 4 years ago 3
Ignorance is bad, read a book. Pripyat is in the Ukraine near the Belarus border... neither of those countries are Russia.
sean2762 4 years ago
oh man
insanebuslady 4 years ago
Human arrogance comes at a terrible price.
LimaUniformCharlie 4 years ago
Terrible :(
VanyLka 4 years ago
I wasn't trying to go that far in depth. I was saying why would a country like the UK or France, for example, make a huge deal out of Chernobyl while at the same time be considering building a new reactor? No country that has nuclear reactors and plans to possibly build new ones will be willing to do much about Chernobyl. Doing so would draw attention to it and probably cause the public to demand that their respective government not build a new reactor and find ways to close the current ones.
dosborn05 5 years ago
Are you asking me or making a point? Consider your choice of words. Panic is from the Greek panikos emanating from Pan, the Greek god of fields and flocks - also considered the source of irrational fear. It all depends on whether you think the fear of nuclear power is irrational or not.
badpilgrim 5 years ago
Excellent. According to the Chernobyl Forum, an international organisation of scientific bodies including a number of UN agencies, deaths directly attributable to radiation from Chernobyl currently stand at 56 - less than the weekly death toll on Britain's roads.
The Chernobyl Forum obviously has its own agenda. Governments now see Nuclear Power as the only "sane" alternative for the coming energy crisis. Well that's real insanity for you.
badpilgrim 5 years ago
Unfortunately, no major government will confront the problems from Chernobyl until something 'better' than nuclear power is found. Why would they want to cause a panic over the so called cleanest producer of energy?
dosborn05 5 years ago
it makes you think how fuck up the world really is that all we can do is worry about our little problems when the the fact is we don't problems compared to the all poor people who were effcted by the chernobyl.
weaselfighter 5 years ago
Good god. I keep on crying.
samoht1977 5 years ago
I know. It is terrible what happened there.
dosborn05 5 years ago
afwul.... :((
necke20 5 years ago