Added: 3 years ago
From: care4urbaby
Views: 58,125
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (123)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Fucking circumcision ruined my once beautiful pecker... :( 

  • fuck islam fuck jews all the problem from them also they cut my skin all now my dick 20 and has very short skin look like damage

  • I had my circumcision 2 days back and I'm taking my pills regularly and the doctor told me to put ointment on my stitches so I did and I'm not wearing anything but I cover my self with a towel that is stitches on the side of my two pillows so I don't get myself exposed too much but the ointment is white when I apply it and the next day morning I wake up the ointment leaving back yellow ish sticks glue kind of thing that is on the bottom of my pee hole and After I take my shower it didn't go awa

  • @60rahotham niiiiice

  • this is great on the woman side cuz since they loose sensibility they cant cum as easily HA more thrusting wooo hooo hahaha

  • @yadiras69 lool if you dont know what you are talking about, then keep your mouth shut

  • Just as I thought, 222sgc is now all silent. Caught him in a lie. Once again, another irrational pro-mutilation moron exposed.

  • @222sgc I am sure you are correct that headlines have been made - yet this has hardly reached the mainstream news, common knowledge or reduced death rates - I wish it had. I am sure I am not alone in wishing that a thickened and coarsened glans penis was The Countermeasure to this killer disease. Could it simply be that this claim cannot be reliably made because there is no definitive evidence to substantiate the claims of 'a huge reduction in infection rates' as a result of this procedure.

  • 222sgc - found the latest research from this year. The claims you make are totally exaggerated.

    The evidence that circumcision cuts HIV infection "by 70%" is a fiction. The evidence so far is insufficient - at best. This is a cultural bias & political agenda by some towards universal circumcision. It could increase infection rates because men experience reduced feelings & will not wear a condom as a result! How come USA does most circumcision but has highest infection rates in industrial west?

  • the foreskin obviously serves a role, i don´t have foreskin covering all of my head which makes my glands vulnerable for rubbing which don´t affect me significantly now, but maybe will when i´m much older, will make it dry and unmoised and have thickened skin, basically it´s when you turn in the bed with morning erections, can wear plaster, or tape on it, hell yeah! And that´s only a small part of it, all the never endings and the glide movement obviously is important!

  • 222sgc. Thank you. Please could you point me, precisely, to this 'latest' research? If what you say is true, then this is a MAJOR news story for all the world to benefit from, as we are looking at a near-cure and could save the lives of many millions, and prevent a lot of children being orphaned. I am appalled that this has not been broadcasted and debated. It's momentous. Please let me have this information. Thank you again.

  • The first time I saw this story I was very young. I decided right then and there that I would never circumcise my future sons. We have to stand up for our men an our boys. To allow this to happen to anyone is beyond cruel...

  • Bann circumsition and stop ruining peoples sexlife! I THINK i have a bit too little foreskin OR maybe my penis has gotten a slightly bit longer since my masturbation techniques IN THE PAST/Teens sometimes has been a bit weird, either i wear plaster on it OR have my underpants really tight on, else the horrible rubbing will occur and i have a idea that my sensation has gotten a little bit weaker mainly on the glands, think it´s mental (mostly) but it bothers me a bit i must say!

  • A boys penis belongs to the parent, NOT the boy! A simple plastic prosthetic and plastic tube for urination can easily replace your "ruined" penis. Boys are not girls, and therefor have no genitals in need of this so-called "equal protection"!

    -Rupert Murdoch, 1211 Avenue of the Americas, N.Y., N.Y. 10036

  • You all need to file Federal Citizen Complaints, since scarring, FGM (legally MUST cover boys Equally under US Constitution, since boys have genitals too), for conspiracy to discriminate (age, gender, the disability of infancy and that no compelling life-giving ER warrants scarring aka, circumcisions inflicted upon non-consenting male infants and teens who may coerced or sexually harassed into "consenting" to being sliced!) The US Attorney in NY District: Preet Bharara, 1 St Andrews Plz 10007

  • @hot1cold0 Actually, if you talk to women who've been with both cut and uncut guys, we'd say the opposite. Uncut guys last longer, and more importantly they recover in minutes and can go again. Sex without a foreskin is like pizza without sauce - it's a totally different experience. As for cleaner, dude... any unwashed peen is stinky. Showering is key no matter what!

  • I use to think i was a freak for being uncircumcised for seeing all the influnces today and I'm in high school so people talking about porn and showing it around and sometimes making fun of the people who are uncut. I never relived that there could be damage for actually doing this. It opened my eyes and now I'm glad I'm uncut.

  • @LOLfights1 Why are you not? I am circumcised.

  • @SuperMario3442 Foreskin is not a 'useless' piece of flesh, as the medical community advertises. There are many books written, and recent research done on this procedure and the function of the foreskin. There are approximately 20,000 nerve endings which enhance pleasure in the foreskin, as well as bands of specialized skin. The head of the penis is meant to be a semi internal organ, without a foreskin it becomes desensitized. A foreskin also improves sexual experience for women.

  • @LOLfights1 Yes, you're very lucky. It's a terrible society that we live in, that mutilates infant genitals and convinces boys and girls that it's better that way. You're the way God intended. You will receive more pleasure and also bring great pleasure to a woman.

  • Circumcision is wrong. Absolutley wrong. So wrong it should be more illegal then cocane for petes sake! I am christian and another reason why I 100% refuse to let some docter touch my penis is because it says that christians should NOT be circumcised. I refuse to be circumcised and I always WILL refuse to get circumcised. This madness has got to end. And for the person who came up with this idea. The very FIRST person who came with this idea. I hope he/she suffers for every person who got circum

  • Visit FOREGEN.ORG! A charity that will use stem cells to regrow your foreskin!

  • thumbs up if foreskins are unecessary

  • Let's help foregen.org for foreskin regeneration!

  • @iplaydirty96 That's sad. But many women make that mistake. It wasn't your fault; you were only a teenager and were not really given a choice. We just have to try and learn from our mistakes and use our own experiences to help others. Hopefully you can speak out about your experience and dissuade other expectant mothers from perpetuating this practice.

  • I used to freak out about not being cut, but every girl I have been with has been completely, internally satisfied with my uncut nature, and I have received head on numerous occasions without a hitch. We live in a society where we are conditioned by the porn industry and other such influences that a circumcised penis is what is normal and attractive. But I think there are many people out there whose minds are clouded by fantasy and don't stop to think of the ridiculousness of imposed mutilation.

  • The worst thing is that circumcision is the socially-accepted norm these days, and there are so many negative stigmas attached to the "non-cut" that it becomes embarrassing for those who are not cut to show themselves in a naked (read: natural) state. But, if anyone is smart about it, and has common sense, they shall keep themselves clean and healthy even with their foreskin attached.

  • @TheReapersSon Well said.

  • @whole27 Anyhow, I'm sure you can't wait to cut off part of your natural genital anatomy and negatively impact your sexuality, thusly joining the ranks of all the religionists you so despise - Jews, Muslims and fundamentalist American Christians. Most atheists in the world are not circumcised. But as long as you fit in with backward American culture - that's the main thing.

  • @endofscene that's like saying, because you eat food and sleep just like all the criminals in the world, you are just as bad as them:)

    And there is a huge spectrum of possibilites and beliefs between Theism and Atheism....I'm an agnostic atheist for the record:)

  • @whole27 Food and sleep are physical necessities. Genital mutilation is not. Rather, it is a ritual practiced only by primitive tribal peoples (along with a host of other mutilations and blood sacrifice rituals). It began its secular debue in the 19th century as an anti-sexual practice by repressed Americans (and some English), and guess where they got their sexual-emotional repression from? That's right - religion.

  • @endofscene The apostle Paul clearly said NOT to circumcise if you were uncircumcised. 1 Corinthians 7: 18 Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised. Was a man uncircumcised when he was called? He should not be circumcised. 19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God’s commands is what counts. 20 Each person should remain in the situation they were in when God called them.

  • @starsiegeplayer I am well aware of that. But the fact is that the USA is largest Christian nation in the world, and the majority of Christian Americans are circumcised. The Bible seems obsessed with circumcision.

  • @endofscene Correlation is not causation. The fact is that the Bible says not to circumcise Christians, but to obey the Lord.

  • @starsiegeplayer I take it you are uncircumcised.

  • @starsiegeplayer He's not saying the bible tells you to get circumcised, he's hinting that the first secular instances of circumcision started from a religious idea which was the Christian view on masturbation.

    By the way, the old testament actually does tell servants of god to be circumcised, but that only carried on as a Jewish tradition.

    You Christians really should throw out that stone age crap, Jesus I can cope with but the rest is just barbaric and cruel.

  • @ihaterobbie123 Correct. The OId Testament tells servants of God to be circumcised. The New Testament says that Christians should not do it.

    The only religious circumcisions are performed by Rabbis. Hospital-performed circumcision in the U.S. today is a U.S. thing, not a religious thing. That's it. Trying to assign causation to Christianity is simply a fallacy.

    If you have read my other posts, you know that I agree that Christians should not be circumcising their children.

  • @starsiegeplayer My point isn't that Christians shouldn't circumcise their children, it's that nobody should. It's a barbaric, inhumane torture which hurts all babies just the same.

    Look up J.H. Kellogg, he was one of the main causes for widespread male mutilation we see today in the US. He was a protestant and based his opinions on the teachings of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

  • @whole27 A baby does not have the psychological and emotional capacity to deal with this assault and so is traumatised. They do not know what is happening or why, and they have no one there to protect them. They often go into a semi-coma. An adult has a developed psyche and understands what is happening to him. Moreover, a baby can't consent. An adult can. A baby can't choose the surgeon, the method, or the type of circumcision. An adult can do all these things.

  • @whole27 A baby may not have fully all the nerves and blood vessels of an adult, but a baby doesn't have the option of general anaesthetic, unlike adults. A baby doesn't have the option of post-op pain medication, unlike adults. The most a baby can hope for is topical anaesthetic (which is admitted to have hardly any affect for an amputation) or local anaesthetic (repeated injections into the penis which doesn't remove all the pain). Most babies receive absolutely no anaesethetic at all.

  • @whole27 Why would you want to be circumcised? Are you trying to fit in? Get laid? As an atheist you must appreciate the socalled Evolutionary Design of the body. Circumcision is an antisexual practice of genital mutilation. If an adult wishes to do that to themselves then fine, but it is unethical and abusive to do it to a child. Once upon a time it was thought that babies felt no pain. Now it is understood that babies are as sensitive as adults, if not more so.

  • @whole27 No offense, but you're an idiot. Circumcision is ultimately a religious thing. It had its secular debut in the USA in the 19th century to reduce pleasure and hinder masturbation. You are an atheist. Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens are both intact ("uncircumcised"), as are most English men. They are against Genital Mutilation (aka "circumcision"). There are dozens of videos on youtube where Christopher Hitchens expresses his disdain for the practice.

  • I was circumcised at 16 years old due to physical problems. I chose a loose circumcision thus leaving quite a bit of the nerves there for i always had extra. Either way i still dont see hwat the big deal us unless you are a baby. If you cant choose then its not right. Cut or uncut it never matters. If you have the choice then its all ok.

  • @whole27 At least as an adult you can choose whether or not to keep your frenulum, and whether you want a high or low, or tight or loose style of circumcision.

    If it was done to you as a baby, then you just have live with whatever they did. I personally know someone whose infant circ was done too tightly and now he has very uncomfortable erections with his scrotum and coarse shaft hair pulled unnaturally onto the shaft when erect. He really wishes no one had cut off any part of his penis.

  • @whole27 I know you didn't say anything, but I just said it because it is almost everybody's argument...but even if babies don't feel as much pain as an adult doesn't mean they don't hurt anything! The baby chocking in his cry and to the point where they pass out sometimes tells you how much it hurts them.

    Well, most adults wish their parents hadn't had done it when they were babies...so I guess it is hard to make everybody happy. Maybe your parents should have talked to you when you were 10?

  • @whole27 You are comparing two different things here, if you want to get circumcised then do it,...what's stopping you now? the fact that it will hurt? what? I don't support circumcision on infants but if you ware going to do it at least use anesthesia! The fact that they won't remember it doesn't mean that it didn't hurt.

  • Blame it on GOD ... He's the one who created us and not even caring about us( not giving a shit about poor people) that's why I don't believe in him

  • Im not circumcised and was ridiculed for it.....still dont care, its mine and im keeping it at 30!!!!!

  • I hate cicumcision!!! It is cruel and has no medical reasons to be used on new borns.

  • Tht is so messed up I feel lyk killing doctors after wat happen to my nephew and after they injected something into me they didn't know I was allergic to

  • I understand circumsition if theres something wrong with your penis like you can pull the skin back or whatever (like i did at age 18 i got it done) But if everything is right with it than why touch it?

  • If you wish to regenerate your original foreskin, check out foregen.org

    Although, to keep up with their studies, we need everyone to donate some money to help out.

  • so this is about a guy and a doctor fucked up his curcumsission ? thats harsh and horrible i cant actually describe how bad that is .

  • @DUNST4N

    All circumcision is fucked up.

  • I fukin hate that my parents got me circumsized.

  • @Rappin4Today yea me to if i had the brains i have today, i would have said no.

  • @Rappin4Today why some say its good some say its not.

  • @ilegitprod That is exactly the point; there is a lot of debate about whether it is good or bad and yet we force some men in our society to be circumcised instead of letting them decide for themselves.

  • Actually only americans and jews perform circumcision. There are more uncircumsized people in this world, than cut. Austrial, British, Latin countries, Almost all of europe, most of canada, etc.

    Also the number of american circums is dropping, I woudln't do it to my children no matter how stronly my circumsized doctor reccomended it

  • I am grateful and pleased that my parents had enough respect for MY BODY and left me intact. If a woman can abort another living person inside their body claiming it is their own body, how does it turn out that a man's foreskin is the personal decision to remove off a baby's body that is most definitely their own?!

  • Part 1:

    Debates to circumcise a baby without consent are for people who clearly don't give a shit about human rights, and they treat their babies/children like a piece of property! If you live for human rights THEN THAT SHOULD ONLY BE THE PENIS OWNER TO MAKE THAT DECISION regardless of the parents circumcision beliefs! Parents who spend a lot of time thinking if they should circumcise their babies should mind their own fucking genitals! DO YOU PEE OR HAVE SEX with your baby's Penis??

  • Part 2:

    You're sick to take a blade to a brand-new innocent helpless baby, to deprive him of lots of sexual pleasure, to alter and deprive him of a natural sex and his right to choose! You parents are slave minded! Humanitarian children don't love or appreciate circumcision! Circumcision relates to $Medical or Religious, BUT IT'S NOT HUMANE!

  • im proud to be circumcised.... i feel clean

  • @shinevrything I feel sorry for you. I guess if your eyelids were removed you would feel... clean? Your country got duped, man. You guys only started circumcising because of American influence during the Korean War. Now you are the only other country in the world apart from the USA that practices RIC for secular reasons. And do you know about the origins of secular circumcision in the USA during the 19th century? Fortunately, though, you'll never know what was lost.

  • Slave thinkers are circumcising their children the most!

  • I could understand if there was something wrong. Maybe the foreskin was stuck and couldn't be pulled back or something, but doing it for aesthetics or because you feel it's right...

    Aesthetics have caused men to lose pleasure. They can't feel sex the same as uncircumcised men, cannot experience foreplay, and become 'raw' during intercourse.

    I hope this becomes illegal and that I'm old enough to vote when it does...

    These parents are ruining their children. It's sickening.

  • I am British, all my life I have been told to be tolerant to other people and groups. This is a lie. It is great and noble to abhore the American nation and it's evil culture and sciety.

  • Circumcision is primitive and barbaric

  • Who was the first person to think that cutting off a baby's foreskin was a great idea? It's child abuse. If a man chooses to have his foreskin removed, that's up to him, but babies don't get a choice.

    If you believe in God, why would he create foreskins just so that they could be cut off? Why make them at all? Just so the baby has to endure a painful ceremony? Circumcision is a cruel human invention.

  • @Steve7508 According to Jewish scripture the slaves of the Jews must all be circumcised. It's like a branding of sorts.

  • @Steve7508 haw the best comment i ever seen but Circumcision in my country (Norway) we actuly dont haw the tools on hospitals to do it because no one wants it and they dont now what it is... and is it only jews that does it and muslims?

  • Yeah, infant circumsision is just about THE most retarted thing humans have done, especially since they still do it and have no good reason or even a damn clue why they do it.

  • The mother is so selfish. The decision was made by her and her husband that ended up ruining the son's life. She doesn't want her son dead because she's gonna miss her son despite the fact that her son has to live with the pshychological pain. Selfish.......

  • In Law and most of the world, Baby boys are NOT human beans, because if they were, circumcision would be a human rights violation!! Baby girls are human beans!!! I don't believe in circumcision but that's the way how Powerful controlling people make the Law work!! The Law give the rights to parents to play GOD and recreate the human baby boy's penis off of their own beliefs rather than the owner of the penis!!

  • Human BEAN? I think you mean human BEING.

  • @seaco2000  LOL HUMAN BEAN

  • Primitive cultures, primitive people, primitive acts. That is circumcision.

  • Stupid cultures, stupid people, stupid opinions.

  • im glad my tower of power still has a tent over it. if u get what i mean

  • me 2

  • @elmaschingon142006 i know what you mean

  • I can't believe this is still legal!! It's a torture to the most vulnerable human being in the world, a new born, and they can't just wait until the child is old enough to get an anesthesia??? I bet an adult would never get this procedure done without being anesthetized first, right???

    WHY??? >PLEASE PEOPLE STOP!!

    This cold hearted parents, can't you just hear the cry of your baby asking you to defend him, and make them stop hurting him?? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU!?? It is so unfair! Poor babies!

  • @BenDcida good thing Reform Judaism does NOT require circumcision. just saying.

  • @mando1097

    Converting to reform Judaism is a joke, your conversion is valid nowhere else than in the reform movement. Most reform Jews however chooses to circumcise their newborns.

    The prejudice against circumcision I see among the comments is based upon nothing but scary stories about failed operations (which there is with all surgeries...) and ignorance. The foreskin serves no purpose, its removal prompts hygiene and lowers the risk of STDs significantly.

  • @222sgc , you are the on sprouting ignorance. The foreskin keeps the head of the penis sensitive by protecting it from outside stimuli. Answer me this, why would you expose a sensitive part of the body to constant outside stimuli and desensitive it as a result? As for hygienic reason, you DO shower and bathe, I assume? As for STD, I assume you are cut. So, would you have unprotected sex then? No? In other words, you get cut only to wear a condom ANYWAY. What logic and igorance.

  • @PungiFungi

    Not true, personally I'm not cut but I make sure to keep my glans exposed at all times. Have more sensitivity since I started to keep the glans exposed... Since no filth collects in the foreskin you need to take zero time for the hygiene of those areas either.

  • @222sgc , for someone who is not cut, you would know that taking care of your penis takes less than ten seconds a day and if you keep your glan exposed, it would only loses it sensitivity later on. And I don't know ANY intact man who would pull his foreskin back and leave it like that for the sake of cleaniless. You are cut, because if you are not, you wouldn't display this shocking display of ignorance and lack of knowledge about a body part you claim you have.

  • @PungiFungi

    Swedes, sadly are not circumcised. And frankly, I'm a Swede... By your comments you can come to the conlcusion that you suffer of tight foreskin, only then would you reject the obvious ease of cleanliness (obviously since I'm not curcumcised I won't have protection to STDs) of a contracted/cut penis. The thinnest part of the skin which lets through contagious pathogens are removed during circumcision, thus significantly reducing any sort of infection or STD.

  • @222sgc , then are you saying circumcised men should have unprotected sex? I don't think so. In other words, men get circumcised only to wear condoms ANYWAY. And the fact that you think I have a tight foreskin AGAIN, show your ignorance about a body you supposedly have, or should I said, HAD. The cleaniless of a circumcised penis comes with the price of a desenitived one. 5 seconds a day to clen it is a small price to pay.

  • @222sgc , I see, you must follow Islam. I am not going to assume anything, but either you are Swede converting to Islam or you are not a Swede at all. So you are supporting circumcision for religious reasons, backing it with so-called benefits and myths that have been long since debunked. Religions, especially Islam, has never been know for common sense.

  • @PungiFungi

    So now I'm a muslim suddenly only because I don't want to reject common sense? Obviously you're the subject of some nationalist anti-circumcision frenzy people's propaganda. Apart from other benefits such as cleanliness, disease prtoection, circumcision virtually irradicates the risk of penis cancer. Human Papilloma Virus (that causes cervix cancer in women) thrives under the foreskin, and so if you care about your wife at all and wishes to have kids, that's just another benefit.

  • @222sgc ,again, cleaniless is not an issue. You are too lazy to bathe? Again, penile cancer is rare, so rare that you will probably get skin cancer or even lung cancer. Why not remove your skin and lungs? They will never give you trouble then. STDs? I dare any circumcised man out there to sleep with an infected partner. Again, any so-called benefits you are quoting can be achieved via hygiene (I guess you don't wash) and responsible sexual behavior.

  • @PungiFungi , so you claimed that you pull your foreskin back to keep your penis clean whereas taking a shower (I hope you do) will do just as well? If this is your definition of "common sense", I rest my case.

  • @PungiFungi

    Apparently you don't understand that there are diseases beyond STDs, such as the Human Papilloma Virus. A man will in no way know if he's a carrier as he won't get affected, whilst the woman who aquires the diesease from a uncircumcised man will get cancer... The benefit of cleanliness is only one of several benefits of circumcision. And I highly doubt that uncircumcised men inspects their glans with a microscope as to remove all bacterias present.

  • @222sgc , again, if you take showers and baths, cleaniless is taken care of without circumcision. No need to inspect your glan with a microscope to see any bacteria. And as for Human Papillomavirus, medical authorities advise using a condom. Again, any benefits to circumcision can be easily gain by simple hygiene...and since you keep bringing that up, I can safely assume you don't bathe. You ass must stink then. Too bad circumcision can't take of that...AND responsible sexual behavior.

  • @PungiFungi

    I don't know about you, but I'll want to have kids some day without risking to give my wife cancer... Cleanliness is only ONE out of several benefits.

  • @222sgc and AGAIN, cleaniless is achieve via personal hygiene. And the risk of giving your wife cervical cancer is so small that she will probably get breast cancer first. Plenty of uncut men have children and their wives are perfectly fine. Admit that your religion is your major motivation, as all of the so-called medical benefits you are citing have been disclaimed.

  • @PungiFungi

    Did you even read the last post? Cleanliness is as stated only one of many benefits, I would consider the greatly reduced disease risks as the most important benefit, reducing penis cancer and cervix cancer by a 100%, greatly decreased risk of infections and STDs, no risk of getting tight foreskin, etc. The benefits are there and they are big. My "religion", agnosticism motivates me to get a circumcision...? Grow up.

  • @222sgc , have YOU read the last post? Cleaniless can be achieve non-surgically. By bathing. I guess you don't bathe then? You need to grow up and realize that everything have a price. A foreskin gives a man greater pleasure, but like ALL BODY PARTS, it may give you trouble down the line, and the chance is miniscule. Removing ANY body part guaratee you won't get any problems associated with it. But at a cost as well, and in this case, dramatically decreased sexual pleasure.

  • @PungiFungi

    You still ignore my post, cleanliness is only one of MANY beneficials. I don't know if you clinically sanitizes your penis with biohazardous chemicals to get rid of all disease pathogens? Because unless you're circumcised you will carry many bacterias that will not just wash off from a shower... If you have a bad libido and sensitivity you don't need to reflect it on those who haven't.

  • @222sgc , actually, being circumcised give you a bad libido AND loss of sensitivity. And again, cleaniless is not an issue when soap and water will do. Then again, if women don't need to sanitizes their private parts, which is more dirty than any man's foreskin with biohazardous chemicals, neither do men.

  • @PungiFungi

    Quite the opposite, most circumcised men I know are more sexually active than their non-circumcised friends. Apart from that they can orgasm more frequently (within shorter time frames). Soap and water won't remove HPV nor HIV, whilst circumcised men won't even acquire these sorts of viruses. Penis infections is much more frequent in uncircumcised men, but uncommon among circumcised men. Thus, obviously it serves no "protective" function either.

  • @222sgc . To say that circumcised men won't acquire these virus is a blatant lie and an extreme irresponsibility on your part, which goes to show that you don't know what you are talking about. Again, the foreskin is to protect the penis from being desensitized.

  • @PungiFungi

    Circumcised men have greatly decreased odds of aquiring HIV and virtually no risk of HPV. There are no biological role of the foreskin as to "protect from desensitization", while this is also a myth, only few people claim to lose sensitivity...

  • @222sgc , actually it is not a myth and it if serve no biological role, male MAMMALS, not just humans, would never evolved it. Not many men who have done later in life do claim loss of sensitivy. Then again, you claim to be uncut and keep yourself clean by pulling your foreskin back. With such inanity, nobody here takes you seriously.

  • @PungiFungi

    Most mammals don't have any foreskin, but a "sheath". That means they have their penises retracted inside their bodies. That, certainly is a protective measurement, apart from the foreskin which is mainly present in primates (monkeys). Now, what a foreskin lover as you didn't know is that the amount of foreskin in humans is completely dependant on genetics, thus some men have the anomoly of tight foreskin. And no, pulling your foreskin only to keep clean is some insanity you made up

  • @222sgc , I do know that not all foreskin are made equal. Mine completely cover the head whereas some men have one that do not. And so what if some men have tight foreskin? And as far mammals, sheath or not, why would their penis be protected whereas human males should be exposed via circumcision? And I need made up the pulling foreskin back bit, you did and this your own words: "Not true, personally I'm not cut but I make sure to keep my glans exposed at all times."

  • @222sgc So what about all the circumcised men in Africa that have HIV?

    You do not have the correct information.

  • @TheEmadia

    Funny you mention this, considering muslim countries in Africa (where everyone is circumcised) have much lower frequencies of HIV than non-muslim (non-circumcised) African countries.

  • @222sgc I have located WHO summary of this finding you mentioned. You are right, but the result is hardly "much lower frequencies"... There have been 40 studies in all, and all inconclusive. The one in question was in 3 countries, and stopped early. Analysis found that 72 circumcisions would be needed to prevent ONE case of HIV! To sustain this protective benefit safe sex practices (condoms) would still be vital, and further research has questioned even the validity of this finding.

  • @TheEmadia

    Latest research suggests circumcision lowers the risk for infection with HIV by whole 70%. There are many more reports than that of WHO, all with the same conclusions.

  • @222sgc then we should remove all girls ad infants breast tissue..that would end breast cancer....no that would be wrong right because its a woman.

  • I see. This is interesting, does this relate to male or female infection rates? Please could you let me know which countries, and the sources of research where these figure rates are held? Many thanks.

  • @222sgc , and BTW, no matter, what you do, you can NEVER get rid of all diseases pathogens. Even a circumcised penis still harbor germs on its surface. Your sense of logic and knowledge of diseases and hygiene is sorely lacking. Please refrain from commenting until you have educate yourself.

  • Many Jews are taking the necessary step and ignoring that part of their religion, i have jewish friend who also doesn't like being cut. they need to ignore it, religion or not, a child shouldnt be braneded.  i hate being cut too, it's horrible, i jused to have a good spot, mindblowing fun, then i hurt the nerve somehow and it's gone, my head is also near cpletly desensitized, i am only 21. i HATE my mother for doing this to me, ignorant fool, yes it is difficult to say, but it's can't not

  • i wonder why people hate the jews maybe it's not cause they are jews after all but what they try to do to others ...

  • My mother is christian, an I have been circumcised. Ignorant people of anykind, i hope that one day we can create a world where they and their societies are completly seperate from the rest of us, they are NOT OUR TYPE.

    and no, besides for my thinking that every Jew who does this to their children should be imprisoned for a few decades, they are some of the decent people, although i still won't ever want to grow up in their home

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more