umm, asta este romania pe care vrem sa o aratam, nu cea care e cu adevarat...romania a fost buna pana in jur de 1945, daca castigau nemtii eram faorte bine acuma...acum romania este plina de fitoase tampite cu telefoane jmechere, coruptie, reclame false si oameni care primesc PRIME cat 100 de salarii medii pe economie, MA LASATI, DACA E SA FACEM O RECLAMA DESPRE ROMANIA, SA ARETAM TIGANII SI MANELISTII - TOTI PE CARE TURISTII II VAD!
@szarification the arrow symbolize a historical gesture of Stephen the Great of Moldova, he had like 48 fights against Turks and when he won a battle he ordered a man to strike an arrow and in the place where the arrow impaled the ground he build a monastery, btw you don't have to be rude about it, our history it's more complex than you think you can't present all of our history in some few commercials, and you don't have to be rude about it
@hamsteru2033 in loc sa critici mai bine te-ai angaja sa o curetzi....la critica esti primul si la munca ultimul....mi se face scirba de oameni ca tine care au gura mare si putuoarea si mai mare.
Honestly you sound like, you really hate my country. The way you wrote is as if Hungary is all that counts.I really think you, should stop showing me, how racists and uneducated you are! Also if you hate my country, why did you even, bother to watch this video?
No, I do not hate Romania why should I? What I hate is that people in your country and others who benefited from Trianon lieing to the world about it and they tried everything and keep try to blame Hungary and Hungarian people for everything. This is really nasty and soulless!!! They always write to me like what should I do with my mother and like go back to Mongolia you f......bastard and HunGAYrian etc...I don't think so you would live these comments unanswered!
And again, just cause some Romanians are bad to you. Don't mean all of us are the same. I really did'nt like how you told me not to be proud. Either way i can't help where i was born. There will always be wicked people, you just got to stay strong.
Why would you think, that i be mean to you, just because your Hungarian.You know something i'm half Hungarian to. My fathers father was Hungarian. So it would be dumb to judge you, when i have family there to. Than again i never judge anyone. But like you, i hate being told off in a rude way. I just wish many, would get along, but not gonna happen. Anyhow i forgive you. Sometimes we humans, seem to act out on rage.
@MegaStrigoi You know the basic probem is that if I ask some unconfortable questions from the romanian brothers 90% of them start to qualify the others aspecially the hungarians instead of giving answare. There is a guy placed onto youtube a lot of films with full of stupid standings... If I ask from him some question, the first answars were f...g hungarian adn similar, Without givin answare for very simple questions.
@MegaStrigoi And thank for this style the people can thing with rights this is nothing else then desinformation of the world simple but very strong romanian propaganda. When they introduce the Saxon towns as a sample of the middle ages romanian architects it is hard to say anything.
Don't be so idiot. Those Saxons built their cities on Romanian land, live between Romanians, trade and intermarried with them for centuries. Nobody says their cities have Romanian architecture, but we lived together and influenced each others.
So they are part of our history now. Besides every country is proud of all monuments from their countries, even if they were build by other people. For example Budapest has a lot of Austrian-built monuments.
@LaurentziusRo88 First of all, the saxons arrived to Hungary thanks for the invitation ot the hungarian kings. And Gávor Bethlen and even the hungarian kings were not allowed to enter the Saxon towns. Thanks for the freedomletter of III Andras. Before trianon that was not romanian land but part of hungary. I do not know what did the Habsburgs built in Budapest but I know that the exploded many hundreds castles after beating down the freedom war from 1703-1711. Many of them in Transilvania
Fist of all, Hungarians conquered Transylvania from Romanians, who lived there for centuries. It doesn't matter who invited the Saxons as long as they got Romanian lands. Many Romanians lived around the Saxon towns, and some of them lived inside the walls. Besides most Saxons lived in villages and if you think they haven't intermarried with Romanian than you're quite stupid.
Budapest was rebuilt by Austrians, you can be sure about it. But i don't hear them claiming the city.
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear sir! I believe only for the archeological artefacts and not for dreams. If you present from the IV-XII century artefacts from the "romanized dacians" then we can talk about the topic. Until it is very hard...
Don't play the smart ass with me kiddo. I believe in archaeological artifacts and written evidences, you are the one who ignore them.
There are many artifacts from the IV-XII century from the Romanized Dacians that are world wide accepted as evidences of our continuity here. Well they are not in Hungary of course.
There were found evidences that Sarmisegetuza was inhabited till the 6th century, the church from Densus was built in the 7th century, the candelabrum from Biertan etc.
@LaurentziusRo88 Then from that many please present some. give some links. Really word wide accepted the goth, gepida, vandal slav, avar , hun magyar artefacts.. Nobody say dear, that Transilvania was empty. there were the above mentioned ones that is sure. The gepidas lived in transilvania even in Sarmisegetuza. Densus was a church from the X or the XII century and not before. It is not proved that it was used as church before the XII century at all. Even that who used it....
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear sir! In the IV century when the donarium dated in my town Pécs there were a very big ancient cristin community... Searc on the net:
"Ókeresztény sirkamrák Pécs" What do you want with one object? the objects made in the roman empire can be found everywhere around the roman empire.
In Pannonia the Romanized population resisted till the 7th century. The donarium was made by locals, it has an inscription in broken Latin that proves that in the 6th century a Romanized population lived in Transylvania.
Tîrg is the old spelling, nothing more. It means market, but it was used for towns too since the markets were held in cities.
Alba Iulia came from Apullum, Timisoara from the river Timis, Satu mare means "the big village", Cluj comes from "clausa". Who are you trying to fool?
@LaurentziusRo88 Was made by locals? really? did you read this? where? how? I know the text on it. A very well known text if somebody became cristin...where were this chrisians? where are the cemeteries? How to prove was made by locals? where is the workshop?
I don't have to prove anything to you, it was already proved by historians and not on YT. I told you about the donarium to give you an example of proto-Romanian artifacts.
Târg is from Slavic and means market period. Târgu-Mureş means the market on Mureş, and Mureş comes from the dacian name of the river Maris. There is nothing Hungarian about it.
What Roman Empire in the 6th century are you dreaming about? Or do you think that migratory people were Christian?
@LaurentziusRo88 Yes Tirg is use for market aspecially if it is a translation of the hungarian name of the town. Dear In Gyulafehérvár I. István founded a monostry for the bishop of Transilvania. I. István is sint of the ortodox chuch too!!!
Julia-is coming from Gyula....Nothing to do with the latin Apullum.
@LaurentziusRo88 So if around the roman empire somebody had an object with latin text that proves that he was romianized dacian? Sir! Around the roman empire everywhere many many artetacts were found....money, objects. etc etc. But the objects aspecially this case this donarium can not tell the lenguage ot the owner....
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! Kolozsvár-Cluj. is one of the 7 big towns built by the saxons. The first name of this towns are saxon. In case of Kolozsvár the ethimology isclear....in the romanian lenguage is coming from the hungarian Kolozs. and not vica-versa.
Show me one map before 1900 where Szatmár was called Satu Mare. After trianon in Transilvania many places had not romanian name at all. Satum mare is simple case because the pronanciation is similar to the hungarian origin Szatmár.
Cluj was founded by Dacians centuries before your people invaded the area. About Satu Mare Romanians called the city this way, no matter what you wrote on your maps. It makes more sense that Szatmar comes from Satu Mare, not the other way around. Also there is Baia Mare around there.
Romanians have urbe for city as well, big deal.
By Austrian architecture I mean the Austrian version of those architectural styles.
@LaurentziusRo88 Furthermore if you tell me 10 but let's say 5 names of villages or towns having romanian origing and this name was used 300 years ago and the village is older then 500 years then I willreflect you. Sir! Even in the romanian lenguage the town went from the hungarian város....or'as. Meaning the romanians did not have this word until they contacted to hungarians in the XII century.
So Hungarians came riding their horses from the steppes of Asia and living in tents and learned us what a city means. You must be insane. Oraş is a neologism, in the middle ages we used târg, cetate or urbe.
Try Alba-Iulia, Cluj, Timisoara, Satu Mare etc. Besides many names were lost cuz you renamed them.
Voicu was 100% Romanian, Cumans were long gone by then.
Austrians rebuilt the Buda Castle to give you just one example.
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! Targ or tirg menas vásár in hungarian market in english...Tirgu-mures or Targu-mures. even the romanians do not know how to call this town. Vár ancient hungrin word meaning castle... város meaning place with castel. Please do not mix here the middle ages latin texts...
@LaurentziusRo88 Alba-Iuia is straight translation of Gyula-fehér-vár Gyula's-white-castle...Timisora is coming From Temesvár. (again castle) Cluj from the saxon Clausenburg....(siebenbürgen) one of the 7 saxon towns...
@LaurentziusRo88 :-)))) You mix something with something Sir! The Habsburgs did not built anything in Budapest but simbolically they destroyed a part of the Citadelly - still you can see it today - after 1867, from where they controlled Pest with their guns in 1848....Ej-ej.....
Yeah sure. Without Austrians, Budapest would have been just a big village. Most of the city was destroyed during the siege, and after they took the city the Austrians rebuilt the castle. And the city itself was rebuilt in Austrian architecture, left alone that so many of the inhabitants were Germans for a long period.
@LaurentziusRo88 For the ciy or town the hungarians has an own name. we did not borrow it....Its coming from the root word of vár=castle....város=place wih castle. városi= man from the town. városias= place similar to a town...etc....
@LaurentziusRo88 If a tourist group is going to visit the castle of Hunyad they are informed about the story of the castle as a nice sample of the romanian renesaince. Dear! In Rmania there were no renesaince. The reaso is simple, there were no Romania that time. In my town that time Janus Panonius was the bishop who's mortal remains are still in the basilika. He was an excellent italian poet wrote in latin.
Hunedoara castle was built by Iancu de Hunedoara's father, a Romanian knight who fought for the Hungarian king. And it's pretty sure that the majority of bricklayers were Romanian peasants. So it's safe to say it's a Romanian historical site.
Even if there wasn't a country called Romania, the Romanian people was right there. Following your logic there was no Italian Renaissance either, since Italy was founded in the 19th century.
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! that castle was given by the Hungarian king to Hunyadi Vajk who is called the father of Hunyadi János.... But that is not sure. Even Hunyadi Vajk is not proven that he was romanian. He could be also kuman.
@LaurentziusRo88 You like to turn out the others idea I see. But I am sure you understand very well what I told about the resaince.And I can tell you the first documents about the castel from earlier time then Vajk Hunyadi got if from Zsigmond. And János rebuilt it. And later Bethlen Gávor...
You may know there is a time in history named Dark Age.During this age migrating peoples invaded Europe (among them huns your ancestors) living no trace about the peoples living here in Europe.Even a geographical protected place as England has a gap in its history caused by migrating peoples.Those migrants were very rude and savage (like your ancestors).They destroyed a lot of the old Europe.The only thing they could not destroy were the old peoples of Europe.Here we are even you like it or not.
@gabi090z Dear! The Dark Ages took not more then 300 years but even from that time many artefacst were found in the charpatian basin and in Transilvanis. We are speaking about the period from the IV - XII century that is about 800 years but from 271 to 1171 it is 900 years. I speak about this periode. and from this period there are not artegacts from the romanians in transilvania...but only from the gepidas hundred of hundred artefacts, tombs, cemeteries were found.
not speaking about the avar, hun, and hungarian artefacts...
Is it in you mind logic, that nothing were found left by the romanaians but many many things from the other groups? Where were they? The history is based on the artefacst and not on the dreams and fantasy.
You seem to know some history, hungarian style. "Where were the romanians that time?" you asked. Anonimus might give you a clue if you know who is he.
About avar, huns, gepid and others artifacts I gave you already an answer. This people robbed and destroyed whatever they could not rob. This is why you find so many artifacts that belonged to this peoples. And this is not all but for you it is enough. I have doubts you are honestly looking for truth.
@gabi090z Dear! Anunimus is used by the romanians only as a source. What he wrote many things were true in the XII century and not 300 or even more years before! If you read anonimus. look at how many generation were from Attila to Árpád....What he wrote about the familytree of Árpad it is simple not true. But there are many things have been proven are not true. That's why the historiants - and not only the hungarians - can not use him as a historiant. He was not that. He wrote a gesta....
@gabi090z Other thing I would like to mention you! The romanians like to select the sources...what is good fro them , they use. what not they do not. Why did not they use Heltai who lived only 100 years later then Hunyadi? Because he writes the true father of Hunyadi János???
@gabi090z Not me who can not accept the continuity theory, but many scientists from the word. But of course the official romanian education system is silent about them. The situatio is very clean. Thousend pf thousend artefacts , tombs, cemetries were found from the period of IV-XII century in Transilvania. NO one belongs to the romanians. The historiants believe on the historical fatcs, artefacts etd... The romanians believe for their dream.
You are a liar. I have one thing to say to you, leave your Hungarian propaganda books and read Encyclopaedia Britannica for a change. Or maybe you think they are Romanian propagandists undercover :).
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! When did I say false? Mostly I ask you only.... but I do not get answare. right answare at all.
Instead of presenting the artefacts you qualify me. Please focus on the open questions I askked from you from 271 to XII cenetury is a long time...You should find something...
Geez you're impossible. Encyclopaedia Britannica is the most respected scholar in the world and it says that Romanians are the descendants of the Romanized Dacians. So obviously they have clear evidences about it.
As for artefacts you can find them in museums, it's pretty obvious. What do you want? A 8th century dead body tattooed with the words "I'm a Daco-Roman...no signs of Hungarians in Transylvania yet"
Shall I list here many scientists who deny the continuitiy theory?
Dear! This is so important question of the romanian history that you can find a lot of link on the net. With the name of the scientist. Pro-and-contra...Linguistics, archeologists, historiant etc. Why.
@LaurentziusRo88 You can also study the official hungarian documents saved during centuries. In "Országos Széchenyi Könyvtár" You can follow which kenéz (knez) where got lordship from the hungarian kings. And when they arrived to hungary. Among them only one is Vajk Hunyadi.
That chapter was written by the same authors like the rest of the encyclopedia, wtf is wrong with you? That means British historians. So it seems that Europeans historians agree that we are Daco-Romans, cuz honestly I know no historian who denies it, excepting some Hungarian propagandists.
Btw I'm not your history teacher, so by yourself a history book and you'll find as many evidences as you want. But don't buy a Hungarian one.
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! I sent you just one link....You can find on that link some scientists who do not agree the daco-romanian theory...They are indepentdetnt from hungary they give their name to their works. Did you run through it?
Furthermore some places was saved to nowadays from the roman time...but not by the dacians. The dacians dissapeared.
The Byzantine chronicler Priscus of Panium mentions in the year 448, the presence of a Latin-speaking populace North of the Danube The populace was called by him "Ausoni". It should be noted that this was at a time before Slavic migration, so the exonym Vlach was not applied to this populace.
North of Danube includes Transylvania also the North of the Danube goes along the Severin and Banat region to Transylvania where Romanians lived way before the arrival of Magyar tribes in 896
the people of Transylvania were already Christians since 3-4 century, there are many old ancient churches in Transylvania build by our forefathers, Densus is one the few who remained intact
It was built in the 7th century with additions made in the 13th century on the site of a 2nd century Roman temple
it's not very well documented it's only speculated there is report about massing migration towards Transylvania from Vlachs, but in the contrary there is report about exodus of Vlachs from Transylvania to other places to escape the Magyar and Saxon colonization and persecution
Vlachs from Fagaras migrated south part of the Carphatians and Vlachs from Maramures east part, Transylvania was the genesis and ancient land of Romanians, therefore Wallachia and Moldova was created
First group of the wlach arrived to Fogaras, and later the hungarian kind ordered some of the nobils to go to east to moldva. The reason is simple. the prevent the tatar invasion. But not only romanians were ordered to go there but hungarians to. These hungarians the so called "noth csangos" for example in Szabóvalva-Sabaoani.
You can repeat that that Transilvania is ancient romanaian land but then some cemeteries should have benn founded as in the balkan have been found from the period of IX-XII century. This is also supported by the orgin ot the names of settlements on the balkan from that period, and the shortage in Transilvania.
Many many still living hungarian nobil family had romananian origin. All of them they know when they arrived and when they got the nobility from the hungarian kings....
before the XII century there were no romanians in Fogaras. Tnem of the place should be remembered by the romanians...Fogaras similar to many many places in Transilvania has hungarian origin name.
the origin of the name can't be sure, it has also Slavic and Romanian etymology, yes Transylvania has Hungarian original name, Romanians didn't consider this land as a whole land only in 16 century we started to call it like Hungarians Ardeal/Transilvania before then we consider it as a land of small countries like Teara Banatului, Teara Crisanei, Teara Motilor, Teara Maramuresului, Teara Severinului, Teara Fagarasului etc
That is right. But if you see how the settlements got names you can see a kind of fashion during the centuries. there are a lot of slavic origin names. That were accepted by the hungarians. I do not think if there had been romananian name settlements they would have not accepted them. But clearl see there is not romanian origin name from before the XIII century.
Hungarians get their name from aboriginal and local people specially the river names the Hungarian names are not original and if they are they aren't 1,000 years old
Bulgarians didn't live on the North side only in Dobruja and Southern Bessarabia, there are a lot of evidences about the presents of Romanians close 10th century, you just have to dig in for some info' and dig them out without being subjective about it
1. An ancient letter from one Emmerich of Elwangen of Grimaldus, abbot of St. Gall, written about 860 mention Vlachs, under the name of Dacians, living on the north of Danube together with Germans, Sarmatians, and Alans.
2. The chronicle Oguzname, the oldest Turkish chronicle in existence, mentioning a warlike expedition of the Cumans, affirms the existence of a Country of the Vlachs (Ulaqi) east of the Carpathians in 839, affirming that the region was well organized and with a powerful army.
3. A ninth-century Armenian geographer mentions the country "Balak".
4. In the 11th century, Abu Said Gardezi wrote about a Christian people from Rûm situated between the Slavs and Hungarians
5. The Saga of Eymund (Eymundar Þáttr Hringssonar), composed in the 11th century and preserved in a 13th century manuscript mentions an army composed of Cumans and Vlachs fighting for the prince of Kiev.
6. Around 1120, the Gesta Henrici written by the cleric Godefirdus von Viterbium mentioned the countries conquered by Rome including Blachina (Blach, being a synonym to Vlach, meant Romanian)
7. In 1374 Pope Gregory XI wrote of Transylvania as having a "great populace which goes by the name of Valachian" ("Multitudo quorundam popolorum qui Valachones vocantur")
the most critica period is the IX-X century. Many settlements have romanian origin name from that time from tuday Serb and MAcedonia. Later from northe of the Danube from the XI century. But from transilvania the fist romanian setlements are from the xIII century only...this is clean cronologic order.
@LaurentziusRo88 It is clearly proven all places used by the romans became empty after 271. EMPTY!!! nothing were used on that places after them. Some names remained for today, but thanks not for the dacians but the people who lived there after the romans. Best example the river name Marisus.... Today it is MAros-Mures. This was definite not saved by the romanians. And what about the smaller rivers???? No one has rorman origin names... Even some has german, thanks for the saxons...
"It is clearly proven all places used by the romans became empty after 271. EMPTY!!! "
this is just a Hungarian propaganda the historical arguments sustain this
The Roman-Gothic author Jordanes who was raised in Moesia and was familiar with the ethnic character of the area, wrote in the 6th century that the Romans had only moved the legions from Dacia, and not the population.
yes, but how can it be that the cemeteries were not used anymore? Only some cemeties were used after 271 but proven not by dacians but goths and gepidas.
@LaurentziusRo88 where the hungarians found slavs, the hungarians used the name what was used by the slavs....There are many place in Transilvania also in the full carpatian basin....
@LaurentziusRo88 We know that the bulrarians change the turk lenguage to slave. In the romanian lenguage there are a huge number of slave words... If wer remove the newlatin and the french words, in you lenguaget even 50% will be the slav words? Where and when did you got it from the slavs. Certainly not in Transilvania because for this there had to be a huge slav interaction. where are the slaves now? they asimilated.. and the romains not?
I will not debate with you any further. Historians from all over the world already debated and they clearly proved we are the descendants of the Dacians and Romans. You are or brainwashed or you simply don't want to accept the truth. But you should try to read some real history books, you still may have a chance. Seriously, your questions are silly and historians answered to them long time ago so it's pointless talk about them over and over again.
@LaurentziusRo88 Yes. Until you do not present the cemeteries of the romanians lived in Transilvania before the XII century we can not speak about the topic. I presented you a map with the places where hundreds of hudreds gepida artefacts, tombs,. cemeteries were found.
from the IV-VI century. I do not mention the avars, huns,,, etc...You can present me the romanian artefacts from the IV-XII century... 800 years compared to 300.
... I have time... I am patient. Do not give it up!!!
@LaurentziusRo88 the artefacts as told by the romanian historiants to be daco-romanian artefatcs are not accepted by the historiants. And not only the hungarians but from everywhere in europe.
@LaurentziusRo88 "I'm a Daco-Roman...no signs of Hungarians in Transylvania yet" I see you did not loss your humor! That is ok! Without the tatoo is ok!!! but not only one body...It is not possible to compare... Like the gepida tombs clearly can be identificatd....
@gabi090z If you are a liitle bit at home of the probability calculation, how ca you explain the shortage of the artefacts? How? There is no ONE that definitelly can be told had been made by the romanians.,. Even NO ONE!!!
Pentru toti ungurii prosti care cunosc si limba romana: 1.Valahi este denumirea data de catre germani vorbitorilor de limba latina la nord si sud de Dunare dupa 1100,dacii au trait dintotdeauna pe aceste meleaguri,desi ne-au invadat si slavii dupa plecare Aureliana din 271! 2.Rumani este o clasa sociala ce reprezinta taranul roman legat de pamantul pe care il muncea,Mavrocordat a desfiintat aceasta clasa! 3.Tiganii alcatuiesc cel mult 5% din populatia Romaniei,la unguri ei formeaza 20% din pop!
Transylvania was once the nucleus of the Kingdom of Dacia (82 BC106 AD). In ancient geography, especially in Roman sources, Dacia was the land in East-Central Europe inhabited by the Dacians.The Dacians, situated north of the lower Danube in the area of the Carpathians and Transylvania, are the earliest named people from the present territory of Romania. (Wikipedia).
After what i saw in your country turks resemble more like gypsies than romanians.And let's not forget gypsies were brought in Romania by the Otoman empire and the Russian empire to control us better,but didn't succeeded ,who had gypsies before us?Do not insult my country ever again!
But i cant stand this comparison : 1 Gypsie = Romanian thus All Gypsies = Romanians thus All Romanians = Gypsies. Nope. We do have gypsies, but they are not even 10% of the romanian populace. Because of this you DONT HAVE THE RIGHT to call all romanians gypsies. You have gypsies too. How would you be if everybody called all your nation gypsies ? I`m sure you would do the same thing i do now which is teaching the others a lesson of history.
I thought you were overexcited someone insulted your country so you were in a rush to speak wise to that person, sorry. Tho if you wanna talk about history, talk about WW2 :D
They established here so we never were any of them. If they established in romania they became romanians , if they established in hungary they became hungarians. Thus you have no right to call us gypsies nor do we have that right either.
Then came the Dacians , Thracians , Geto-Dacians wich are all our ancestors. Yet WHO ARE HUNGARIAN ANCESTORS? Atilla the hun invaded europe and he came from mongolia so that means mongolian ancestors are hungarian ancestors too. And the east european civilisations i assure you they werent gypsies. They were slavic people same as russians. Gypsies came from India.
We are not gipsy, retard hungarian, transilvania is romania territory then hungar stole it, thats all you know to do, then we have war and not we have back transilvania ha ! Haha
hahahaha look whos talking ... the mongol invader says we stole the fields when he invaded our fields long after we claimed them... admit it damn hungarian we were here before you so you have no right to say we stolen anything for you since you arrived after us wich means YOU STOLE FROM US !!!
mongol invader is your mother, rromanians history was writed by lair gipsy rromanians, romanians are gipsy albanian sheephards, go back in Oltenia gipsys, transylvania was build by hungarians, only the rubbish is your ! RROMAnians are gipsys of europe
i have nothing personal to hungarians at all. however there are 2 types of them. 1 are junk and 2 are friendly. I personally live in transylvania and have a lot of hungarian friends which i have fun with. But i cant stand the junk type. You all say you build transylvania and all. WE ARE HERE SINCE BEFORE THE FIRST ICE AGE. Yes cavemen but not gypsies yet.
for frankyg70 ....franky you are very wrong all that you say there is shit please dont compare the romanian with the gypsys that steel and lie yes? because the true romanian people arent like you discribed us if you want the truth lets face it 60% of microsoft is full with romanian bill gates would be now a big ZERO without romanians...all the big stars have at least one romanian by their side,the romanian invented the pen,the first jetplane,the insuline and so many and please try to make
i still remember what my teacher once said: One thing you need to know about Romania and Romanian people: "They'r lying and stealing, they did, they do, and will do for ever!" No offense, but in the U.S.A. (at least in Texas) people don't like Romanians
LOL you're Hungarian. Yet when I said that almost all people who insult Romania on YT are Hungarian, they say I'm paranoiac. Fortunately it seems I'm right. I cannot trust your objectivity, therefore spare us your lies. I can say that my let's say Japanese teacher said the same about Hungarians. Anyway i think you're so stupid that you would hang yourself if your teacher told so.
People in USA are very stupid. They were, they are and they will always be stupid (at least in Texas). P.S.: George Bush was raised in Texas, it is a good example.
romanulantiue te annyira hülye vagy, mint a seggem. Gondolom olyan jól tudsz románul is mint angolul... szánalom vagy, valami 15 éves hülye kopasz romaromán lehetsz....
az oláh kokeróknak biztos bejön ez, de miért ez a sok fehér a videón?ruténektől kérték a fehérbőrű szinészeket?:D főleg a strandos jelenet, fehéríteni kellett a gippókon XD
actually, this is Romania. All you Hungarian bastards trying to steal our pride and glory better turn to something else. Matei Corvin, the one that built the Hunedoara Castle, and the one that rulled over Hungary for years was a 100% Romanian. Better start reading some history before making a fool out of yourselfs, my 'friendly' neighbours.
In Romania predomina , din pacate, prostimea , valorile fug ca sunt coplesite de prostia din tara , din cauza asta suntem undem suntem , din cauza asta ilici ne-a condus(in prapastie) atatia ani , de asta basescu ne vinde la fmi pt un secol.
Romania is a beautifull country , unfortunately its inhabited... pun pariu ca ati auzit asta de multe ori , si o sa auziti in continuare , romania este intradevar printre cele mai frumoase tari din lume din unele puncte de vedere , dar cat timp locuiesc dobitoci in ea , o sa ramana la fel in ochii lumii cum este si acuma , adica o a 2-a Somalie... nu ma refer la dobitoci la modul "toti romanii" , doar aproximativ 80% din ei , acei retardati mintali care strica imaginea tarii
O da! Superba civilizatie banateana! Exact ceea ce spuneam. Merci mult ca mi-ai confirmat teoria. Noi suntem mitici, lasa-ne in prostia noastra. Dar voi va bateti cu pumnul in piept degeaba. Ca maimutele.
:)) Esti amuzant rau de tot baiete. Nu exista comparatie intre Arad si Timisoara, te cred ca esti aradean, dar totusi sa fim un pic realisti...Timisoara in zilele ei mai proaste nu o sa arate asa de prost cum arata Aradul. Am inteles ca e in renovare acuma, Aradul, asa ca sa speram ca o sa arate superb, dar nu exista om pe lumea asta care sa fi vizitat Aradul si Timisoara si sa fie de acord cu afirmatia ta(doar daca, la fel ca tine, e aradean din ala cu ura pe Timisoara)Oricum, o zi buna. ;)
Nu sunt aradean. Sunt, mai rau, bucurestean (sau cum se zice pe la voi, "mitic"). Am vizitat si Tm anul trecut. Se vede ca a fost frumos CANDVA, dar cladirile abandonate, Bega imputita si nesistematizata, tiganii, unele magazine care arata exact cum aratau pe vremea comunistilor, drumurile proaste, autobuzele si tramvaiele vechi fac ca Timisoara sa fie departe de a fi un oras frumos.Asta e adevarul,si decat sa va simtiti lezati,ca tare fuduli mai sunteti,mai bine ati pune mana sa schimbati ceva.
Si da, recunosc si pe unii timisoreni in descrierea ta (sunt moldovean crescut in Timisoara) sa vezi ce injuraturi imi iau acuma de la concetateni :P Dar nu toti sunt asa. De 4 ani nu mai locuiesc in tara, dar o vizitez cu regularitate si de fiecare data sunt fericit cand vad Timisoara. Nu e cum zici, se construieste si se repara. Si sincer induci publicul in eroare, avem cea mai noua flota de autobuze din tara,mai noua ca B. chiar, magazine vechi,sunt,dupa cum sunt si in B.(chiar pe Magheru)
Si nu, nu am ura pe Timisoara, ci pe timisoreni. Am stat de vorba cu multi, nu sunteti baieti rai, dar sunteti ingamfati si supremul vostru argument este "civilizatia" banateana, aia care nu exista decat ca sa va laudati voi cu ea. In plus mai exista un curent de opinie pe acolo, cum ca Timisoara n-ar fi in Romania (bine, n-aveti decat sa va credeti in continuare vienezi daca aveti chef). Prin urmare, m-am cam lamurit cum e cu TImisoara voastra.
Ups am dat-o din rau in mai rau...glumesc, stai calm. Va cunosc pe voi miticii, am vizitat si eu capitala de cateva ori, si contrar indoctrinarii mele de banatean am gasit-o interesanta, frumoasa pe alocuri, interesanta in altele, dar oamenii o strica(nu ma refer la tine) si nici la cele nspe mii de neamuri pe care le am pe acolo sau oamenii de treaba de acolo, dar in general sunteti toti intr-o viteza, fara rabdare sau bunul simt de a cere scuze(de exemplu cand ma lovesti din spate cu carutul)
Suntem grabiti pentru ca in general, in toate orasele mari din lume, viata are alt ritm. Pana termina ardeleanul si banateanul de mestecat slana mie mi-a venit de 10 ori metroul. Multi suntem asa cum spui, dar lipsa de bun simt e problema generala in Romania, nu in Bucuresti. Iar bucurestenii nu prea imping ei caruturi. Taranii veniti din toate colturile tarii, multi adusi chiar de Ceausescu sa-i lucreze in intreprinderi, poate.
Pana la urma monopilzam toate comentariile de la clipul asta. Era un carucior intr-un supermarket. Si crede-ma ca stiu ce inseamna viteza din metropole, dar totusi, un scuze, un te rog frumos...inca se zice....eu am fost marcat prima oara cand am fost in Buceresti acuma 6 ani de zile si mi s-a intamplat asta...probabil am avut o zi mai proasta, dar am ramas un pic dezamagit de bucresteni, ma repet nu vreau sa generalizez, pentru ca am si prieteni buni acolo. Dar ca sa incheiem pe un ton amical
umm, asta este romania pe care vrem sa o aratam, nu cea care e cu adevarat...romania a fost buna pana in jur de 1945, daca castigau nemtii eram faorte bine acuma...acum romania este plina de fitoase tampite cu telefoane jmechere, coruptie, reclame false si oameni care primesc PRIME cat 100 de salarii medii pe economie, MA LASATI, DACA E SA FACEM O RECLAMA DESPRE ROMANIA, SA ARETAM TIGANII SI MANELISTII - TOTI PE CARE TURISTII II VAD!
falley11 1 year ago 19
O reclama la gropile din Romania? Sigur vom atrage mai multi turisti... :|
Gabryela4me 1 year ago
beautiful super tare
feroheba 1 year ago 11
@szarification the arrow symbolize a historical gesture of Stephen the Great of Moldova, he had like 48 fights against Turks and when he won a battle he ordered a man to strike an arrow and in the place where the arrow impaled the ground he build a monastery, btw you don't have to be rude about it, our history it's more complex than you think you can't present all of our history in some few commercials, and you don't have to be rude about it
alex4ucj 1 year ago 137
de unde au scos delfinii aia domne?? Eu nu imi aduc aminte sa-i fi vazut la mare.. decat poate daca erau gonflabili..
endeavourthelimits 2 years ago
Asta nu e marea neagra:D e partea de le bulgari sau mediterana..a noastra e plina de petrol shi deseuri....sau mai bine zis 'chiar e neagra"
hamsteru2033 2 years ago
@hamsteru2033 in loc sa critici mai bine te-ai angaja sa o curetzi....la critica esti primul si la munca ultimul....mi se face scirba de oameni ca tine care au gura mare si putuoarea si mai mare.
pgparola 1 year ago 31
bine udreeaaaa :)))
antistrutzy 2 years ago
cel mai frumos vid despre romania care l-am vazut !
uzi92 2 years ago 68
Home sweet home. Amezing. Love the clip.
olahmarcusfilms 2 years ago 4
I'd much rather fuck you...
loveunderlaw 2 years ago
Are you GAY mister???..:)))))))))
hungarian6568 2 years ago
Are you a stupid bitch, ha ha:)?
loveunderlaw 2 years ago
Honestly you sound like, you really hate my country. The way you wrote is as if Hungary is all that counts.I really think you, should stop showing me, how racists and uneducated you are! Also if you hate my country, why did you even, bother to watch this video?
MegaStrigoi 2 years ago
No, I do not hate Romania why should I? What I hate is that people in your country and others who benefited from Trianon lieing to the world about it and they tried everything and keep try to blame Hungary and Hungarian people for everything. This is really nasty and soulless!!! They always write to me like what should I do with my mother and like go back to Mongolia you f......bastard and HunGAYrian etc...I don't think so you would live these comments unanswered!
hungarian6568 2 years ago
Well all i can say is ignore them!
And again, just cause some Romanians are bad to you. Don't mean all of us are the same. I really did'nt like how you told me not to be proud. Either way i can't help where i was born. There will always be wicked people, you just got to stay strong.
MegaStrigoi 2 years ago
You right! I apologize for my comment at you. You just one of them from those who not jumps on me because I'm Hungarian. Thanks!
hungarian6568 2 years ago
Why would you think, that i be mean to you, just because your Hungarian.You know something i'm half Hungarian to. My fathers father was Hungarian. So it would be dumb to judge you, when i have family there to. Than again i never judge anyone. But like you, i hate being told off in a rude way. I just wish many, would get along, but not gonna happen. Anyhow i forgive you. Sometimes we humans, seem to act out on rage.
MegaStrigoi 2 years ago
You are very diplomatic but that's okay I understand that. All the best to you!
hungarian6568 2 years ago
@MegaStrigoi You know the basic probem is that if I ask some unconfortable questions from the romanian brothers 90% of them start to qualify the others aspecially the hungarians instead of giving answare. There is a guy placed onto youtube a lot of films with full of stupid standings... If I ask from him some question, the first answars were f...g hungarian adn similar, Without givin answare for very simple questions.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@MegaStrigoi And thank for this style the people can thing with rights this is nothing else then desinformation of the world simple but very strong romanian propaganda. When they introduce the Saxon towns as a sample of the middle ages romanian architects it is hard to say anything.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
Don't be so idiot. Those Saxons built their cities on Romanian land, live between Romanians, trade and intermarried with them for centuries. Nobody says their cities have Romanian architecture, but we lived together and influenced each others.
So they are part of our history now. Besides every country is proud of all monuments from their countries, even if they were build by other people. For example Budapest has a lot of Austrian-built monuments.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 First of all, the saxons arrived to Hungary thanks for the invitation ot the hungarian kings. And Gávor Bethlen and even the hungarian kings were not allowed to enter the Saxon towns. Thanks for the freedomletter of III Andras. Before trianon that was not romanian land but part of hungary. I do not know what did the Habsburgs built in Budapest but I know that the exploded many hundreds castles after beating down the freedom war from 1703-1711. Many of them in Transilvania
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
Fist of all, Hungarians conquered Transylvania from Romanians, who lived there for centuries. It doesn't matter who invited the Saxons as long as they got Romanian lands. Many Romanians lived around the Saxon towns, and some of them lived inside the walls. Besides most Saxons lived in villages and if you think they haven't intermarried with Romanian than you're quite stupid.
Budapest was rebuilt by Austrians, you can be sure about it. But i don't hear them claiming the city.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear sir! I believe only for the archeological artefacts and not for dreams. If you present from the IV-XII century artefacts from the "romanized dacians" then we can talk about the topic. Until it is very hard...
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
Don't play the smart ass with me kiddo. I believe in archaeological artifacts and written evidences, you are the one who ignore them.
There are many artifacts from the IV-XII century from the Romanized Dacians that are world wide accepted as evidences of our continuity here. Well they are not in Hungary of course.
There were found evidences that Sarmisegetuza was inhabited till the 6th century, the church from Densus was built in the 7th century, the candelabrum from Biertan etc.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Then from that many please present some. give some links. Really word wide accepted the goth, gepida, vandal slav, avar , hun magyar artefacts.. Nobody say dear, that Transilvania was empty. there were the above mentioned ones that is sure. The gepidas lived in transilvania even in Sarmisegetuza. Densus was a church from the X or the XII century and not before. It is not proved that it was used as church before the XII century at all. Even that who used it....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 The Donarium???? Who made it? where was it made? Who was the owner??? only questions.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear sir! In the IV century when the donarium dated in my town Pécs there were a very big ancient cristin community... Searc on the net:
"Ókeresztény sirkamrák Pécs" What do you want with one object? the objects made in the roman empire can be found everywhere around the roman empire.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
In Pannonia the Romanized population resisted till the 7th century. The donarium was made by locals, it has an inscription in broken Latin that proves that in the 6th century a Romanized population lived in Transylvania.
Tîrg is the old spelling, nothing more. It means market, but it was used for towns too since the markets were held in cities.
Alba Iulia came from Apullum, Timisoara from the river Timis, Satu mare means "the big village", Cluj comes from "clausa". Who are you trying to fool?
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Was made by locals? really? did you read this? where? how? I know the text on it. A very well known text if somebody became cristin...where were this chrisians? where are the cemeteries? How to prove was made by locals? where is the workshop?
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
I don't have to prove anything to you, it was already proved by historians and not on YT. I told you about the donarium to give you an example of proto-Romanian artifacts.
Târg is from Slavic and means market period. Târgu-Mureş means the market on Mureş, and Mureş comes from the dacian name of the river Maris. There is nothing Hungarian about it.
What Roman Empire in the 6th century are you dreaming about? Or do you think that migratory people were Christian?
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Yes Tirg is use for market aspecially if it is a translation of the hungarian name of the town. Dear In Gyulafehérvár I. István founded a monostry for the bishop of Transilvania. I. István is sint of the ortodox chuch too!!!
Julia-is coming from Gyula....Nothing to do with the latin Apullum.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 So if around the roman empire somebody had an object with latin text that proves that he was romianized dacian? Sir! Around the roman empire everywhere many many artetacts were found....money, objects. etc etc. But the objects aspecially this case this donarium can not tell the lenguage ot the owner....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! Kolozsvár-Cluj. is one of the 7 big towns built by the saxons. The first name of this towns are saxon. In case of Kolozsvár the ethimology isclear....in the romanian lenguage is coming from the hungarian Kolozs. and not vica-versa.
Show me one map before 1900 where Szatmár was called Satu Mare. After trianon in Transilvania many places had not romanian name at all. Satum mare is simple case because the pronanciation is similar to the hungarian origin Szatmár.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
Cluj was founded by Dacians centuries before your people invaded the area. About Satu Mare Romanians called the city this way, no matter what you wrote on your maps. It makes more sense that Szatmar comes from Satu Mare, not the other way around. Also there is Baia Mare around there.
Romanians have urbe for city as well, big deal.
By Austrian architecture I mean the Austrian version of those architectural styles.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Furthermore if you tell me 10 but let's say 5 names of villages or towns having romanian origing and this name was used 300 years ago and the village is older then 500 years then I willreflect you. Sir! Even in the romanian lenguage the town went from the hungarian város....or'as. Meaning the romanians did not have this word until they contacted to hungarians in the XII century.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
So Hungarians came riding their horses from the steppes of Asia and living in tents and learned us what a city means. You must be insane. Oraş is a neologism, in the middle ages we used târg, cetate or urbe.
Try Alba-Iulia, Cluj, Timisoara, Satu Mare etc. Besides many names were lost cuz you renamed them.
Voicu was 100% Romanian, Cumans were long gone by then.
Austrians rebuilt the Buda Castle to give you just one example.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! Targ or tirg menas vásár in hungarian market in english...Tirgu-mures or Targu-mures. even the romanians do not know how to call this town. Vár ancient hungrin word meaning castle... város meaning place with castel. Please do not mix here the middle ages latin texts...
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Alba-Iuia is straight translation of Gyula-fehér-vár Gyula's-white-castle...Timisora is coming From Temesvár. (again castle) Cluj from the saxon Clausenburg....(siebenbürgen) one of the 7 saxon towns...
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Satu Mare. it is from the hungarian Szatmár...that is a old hungarian name as Vajk ot Koppány etc...
For centuries the romanians living near it called it zatmar. Satu Mare is only from Trianom. new name Sir!!!
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 :-)))) You mix something with something Sir! The Habsburgs did not built anything in Budapest but simbolically they destroyed a part of the Citadelly - still you can see it today - after 1867, from where they controlled Pest with their guns in 1848....Ej-ej.....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
Yeah sure. Without Austrians, Budapest would have been just a big village. Most of the city was destroyed during the siege, and after they took the city the Austrians rebuilt the castle. And the city itself was rebuilt in Austrian architecture, left alone that so many of the inhabitants were Germans for a long period.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Please specify me what means austrian architcture...I know neogot, romantic, barokk, renesaince...echlectic..... etc....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 But of course we would not say not, if Austria would like to rebuild the castles they exploded after 1717....you know it....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 For the ciy or town the hungarians has an own name. we did not borrow it....Its coming from the root word of vár=castle....város=place wih castle. városi= man from the town. városias= place similar to a town...etc....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 you repeat yourlelf.- Please give a list with the buildings have been built by the austrians in Budapest....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 If a tourist group is going to visit the castle of Hunyad they are informed about the story of the castle as a nice sample of the romanian renesaince. Dear! In Rmania there were no renesaince. The reaso is simple, there were no Romania that time. In my town that time Janus Panonius was the bishop who's mortal remains are still in the basilika. He was an excellent italian poet wrote in latin.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
Hunedoara castle was built by Iancu de Hunedoara's father, a Romanian knight who fought for the Hungarian king. And it's pretty sure that the majority of bricklayers were Romanian peasants. So it's safe to say it's a Romanian historical site.
Even if there wasn't a country called Romania, the Romanian people was right there. Following your logic there was no Italian Renaissance either, since Italy was founded in the 19th century.
Stop talking like a child dude.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! that castle was given by the Hungarian king to Hunyadi Vajk who is called the father of Hunyadi János.... But that is not sure. Even Hunyadi Vajk is not proven that he was romanian. He could be also kuman.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 You like to turn out the others idea I see. But I am sure you understand very well what I told about the resaince.And I can tell you the first documents about the castel from earlier time then Vajk Hunyadi got if from Zsigmond. And János rebuilt it. And later Bethlen Gávor...
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
You may know there is a time in history named Dark Age.During this age migrating peoples invaded Europe (among them huns your ancestors) living no trace about the peoples living here in Europe.Even a geographical protected place as England has a gap in its history caused by migrating peoples.Those migrants were very rude and savage (like your ancestors).They destroyed a lot of the old Europe.The only thing they could not destroy were the old peoples of Europe.Here we are even you like it or not.
gabi090z 2 years ago
@gabi090z Dear! The Dark Ages took not more then 300 years but even from that time many artefacst were found in the charpatian basin and in Transilvanis. We are speaking about the period from the IV - XII century that is about 800 years but from 271 to 1171 it is 900 years. I speak about this periode. and from this period there are not artegacts from the romanians in transilvania...but only from the gepidas hundred of hundred artefacts, tombs, cemeteries were found.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@gabi090z Where were the romanians that time?
not speaking about the avar, hun, and hungarian artefacts...
Is it in you mind logic, that nothing were found left by the romanaians but many many things from the other groups? Where were they? The history is based on the artefacst and not on the dreams and fantasy.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
You seem to know some history, hungarian style. "Where were the romanians that time?" you asked. Anonimus might give you a clue if you know who is he.
About avar, huns, gepid and others artifacts I gave you already an answer. This people robbed and destroyed whatever they could not rob. This is why you find so many artifacts that belonged to this peoples. And this is not all but for you it is enough. I have doubts you are honestly looking for truth.
gabi090z 2 years ago
@gabi090z Dear! Anunimus is used by the romanians only as a source. What he wrote many things were true in the XII century and not 300 or even more years before! If you read anonimus. look at how many generation were from Attila to Árpád....What he wrote about the familytree of Árpad it is simple not true. But there are many things have been proven are not true. That's why the historiants - and not only the hungarians - can not use him as a historiant. He was not that. He wrote a gesta....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@gabi090z Other thing I would like to mention you! The romanians like to select the sources...what is good fro them , they use. what not they do not. Why did not they use Heltai who lived only 100 years later then Hunyadi? Because he writes the true father of Hunyadi János???
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@gabi090z Not me who can not accept the continuity theory, but many scientists from the word. But of course the official romanian education system is silent about them. The situatio is very clean. Thousend pf thousend artefacts , tombs, cemetries were found from the period of IV-XII century in Transilvania. NO one belongs to the romanians. The historiants believe on the historical fatcs, artefacts etd... The romanians believe for their dream.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
You are a liar. I have one thing to say to you, leave your Hungarian propaganda books and read Encyclopaedia Britannica for a change. Or maybe you think they are Romanian propagandists undercover :).
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! When did I say false? Mostly I ask you only.... but I do not get answare. right answare at all.
Instead of presenting the artefacts you qualify me. Please focus on the open questions I askked from you from 271 to XII cenetury is a long time...You should find something...
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
Geez you're impossible. Encyclopaedia Britannica is the most respected scholar in the world and it says that Romanians are the descendants of the Romanized Dacians. So obviously they have clear evidences about it.
As for artefacts you can find them in museums, it's pretty obvious. What do you want? A 8th century dead body tattooed with the words "I'm a Daco-Roman...no signs of Hungarians in Transylvania yet"
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago 6
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! My I ask who wrote that chapter?
Shall I list here many scientists who deny the continuitiy theory?
Dear! This is so important question of the romanian history that you can find a lot of link on the net. With the name of the scientist. Pro-and-contra...Linguistics, archeologists, historiant etc. Why.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 You can also study the official hungarian documents saved during centuries. In "Országos Széchenyi Könyvtár" You can follow which kenéz (knez) where got lordship from the hungarian kings. And when they arrived to hungary. Among them only one is Vajk Hunyadi.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
That chapter was written by the same authors like the rest of the encyclopedia, wtf is wrong with you? That means British historians. So it seems that Europeans historians agree that we are Daco-Romans, cuz honestly I know no historian who denies it, excepting some Hungarian propagandists.
Btw I'm not your history teacher, so by yourself a history book and you'll find as many evidences as you want. But don't buy a Hungarian one.
Try Berzovia, from the Dacian Bersobis.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago 7
@LaurentziusRo88 Dear! I sent you just one link....You can find on that link some scientists who do not agree the daco-romanian theory...They are indepentdetnt from hungary they give their name to their works. Did you run through it?
Furthermore some places was saved to nowadays from the roman time...but not by the dacians. The dacians dissapeared.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
you sir are an idiot
mooareyouhappynow 2 years ago 5
The Byzantine chronicler Priscus of Panium mentions in the year 448, the presence of a Latin-speaking populace North of the Danube The populace was called by him "Ausoni". It should be noted that this was at a time before Slavic migration, so the exonym Vlach was not applied to this populace.
alex4ucj 2 years ago 4
north of the Danube....but not north of the south charpatians...
One cemeteries please from the period of IX-XII century from transilvania, that were used by romanians...
Where happened the cristianisation of their people?
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
North of Danube includes Transylvania also the North of the Danube goes along the Severin and Banat region to Transylvania where Romanians lived way before the arrival of Magyar tribes in 896
the people of Transylvania were already Christians since 3-4 century, there are many old ancient churches in Transylvania build by our forefathers, Densus is one the few who remained intact
It was built in the 7th century with additions made in the 13th century on the site of a 2nd century Roman temple
alex4ucj 2 years ago
The christians used cemeteries... Aspecialy around the church. Where is the cemetery around Densus? what lenguage the people talk who built it?
The arrivel of the romanians to the Fogaras, Hunyad and Banat is very well documented.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
it's not very well documented it's only speculated there is report about massing migration towards Transylvania from Vlachs, but in the contrary there is report about exodus of Vlachs from Transylvania to other places to escape the Magyar and Saxon colonization and persecution
Vlachs from Fagaras migrated south part of the Carphatians and Vlachs from Maramures east part, Transylvania was the genesis and ancient land of Romanians, therefore Wallachia and Moldova was created
alex4ucj 2 years ago
First group of the wlach arrived to Fogaras, and later the hungarian kind ordered some of the nobils to go to east to moldva. The reason is simple. the prevent the tatar invasion. But not only romanians were ordered to go there but hungarians to. These hungarians the so called "noth csangos" for example in Szabóvalva-Sabaoani.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
You can repeat that that Transilvania is ancient romanaian land but then some cemeteries should have benn founded as in the balkan have been found from the period of IX-XII century. This is also supported by the orgin ot the names of settlements on the balkan from that period, and the shortage in Transilvania.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
Many many still living hungarian nobil family had romananian origin. All of them they know when they arrived and when they got the nobility from the hungarian kings....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
before the XII century there were no romanians in Fogaras. Tnem of the place should be remembered by the romanians...Fogaras similar to many many places in Transilvania has hungarian origin name.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
the origin of the name can't be sure, it has also Slavic and Romanian etymology, yes Transylvania has Hungarian original name, Romanians didn't consider this land as a whole land only in 16 century we started to call it like Hungarians Ardeal/Transilvania before then we consider it as a land of small countries like Teara Banatului, Teara Crisanei, Teara Motilor, Teara Maramuresului, Teara Severinului, Teara Fagarasului etc
alex4ucj 2 years ago
That is right. But if you see how the settlements got names you can see a kind of fashion during the centuries. there are a lot of slavic origin names. That were accepted by the hungarians. I do not think if there had been romananian name settlements they would have not accepted them. But clearl see there is not romanian origin name from before the XIII century.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
Hungarians get their name from aboriginal and local people specially the river names the Hungarian names are not original and if they are they aren't 1,000 years old
alex4ucj 2 years ago
Bulgarians didn't live on the North side only in Dobruja and Southern Bessarabia, there are a lot of evidences about the presents of Romanians close 10th century, you just have to dig in for some info' and dig them out without being subjective about it
1. An ancient letter from one Emmerich of Elwangen of Grimaldus, abbot of St. Gall, written about 860 mention Vlachs, under the name of Dacians, living on the north of Danube together with Germans, Sarmatians, and Alans.
alex4ucj 2 years ago
2. The chronicle Oguzname, the oldest Turkish chronicle in existence, mentioning a warlike expedition of the Cumans, affirms the existence of a Country of the Vlachs (Ulaqi) east of the Carpathians in 839, affirming that the region was well organized and with a powerful army.
3. A ninth-century Armenian geographer mentions the country "Balak".
alex4ucj 2 years ago 2
4. In the 11th century, Abu Said Gardezi wrote about a Christian people from Rûm situated between the Slavs and Hungarians
5. The Saga of Eymund (Eymundar Þáttr Hringssonar), composed in the 11th century and preserved in a 13th century manuscript mentions an army composed of Cumans and Vlachs fighting for the prince of Kiev.
alex4ucj 2 years ago 2
6. Around 1120, the Gesta Henrici written by the cleric Godefirdus von Viterbium mentioned the countries conquered by Rome including Blachina (Blach, being a synonym to Vlach, meant Romanian)
7. In 1374 Pope Gregory XI wrote of Transylvania as having a "great populace which goes by the name of Valachian" ("Multitudo quorundam popolorum qui Valachones vocantur")
alex4ucj 2 years ago 2
But there are many in the present Serb and Bulgary and MAcedonia from before the X century, and many from noth of the Danube from he XI century...
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
furhtermore the Densus were not built first by christians, because its direction is not east -west....as alll christian church has.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
this is the main problem... the shortage of the christian cemeteries....but generally speaking the shortage of th romanian cemeteries...
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
the most critica period is the IX-X century. Many settlements have romanian origin name from that time from tuday Serb and MAcedonia. Later from northe of the Danube from the XI century. But from transilvania the fist romanian setlements are from the xIII century only...this is clean cronologic order.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
oh stop using "Dear!" all the time and stop being so pretentious.
ungudungu 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 It is clearly proven all places used by the romans became empty after 271. EMPTY!!! nothing were used on that places after them. Some names remained for today, but thanks not for the dacians but the people who lived there after the romans. Best example the river name Marisus.... Today it is MAros-Mures. This was definite not saved by the romanians. And what about the smaller rivers???? No one has rorman origin names... Even some has german, thanks for the saxons...
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
"It is clearly proven all places used by the romans became empty after 271. EMPTY!!! "
this is just a Hungarian propaganda the historical arguments sustain this
The Roman-Gothic author Jordanes who was raised in Moesia and was familiar with the ethnic character of the area, wrote in the 6th century that the Romans had only moved the legions from Dacia, and not the population.
alex4ucj 2 years ago 4
yes, but how can it be that the cemeteries were not used anymore? Only some cemeties were used after 271 but proven not by dacians but goths and gepidas.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 where the hungarians found slavs, the hungarians used the name what was used by the slavs....There are many place in Transilvania also in the full carpatian basin....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 We know that the bulrarians change the turk lenguage to slave. In the romanian lenguage there are a huge number of slave words... If wer remove the newlatin and the french words, in you lenguaget even 50% will be the slav words? Where and when did you got it from the slavs. Certainly not in Transilvania because for this there had to be a huge slav interaction. where are the slaves now? they asimilated.. and the romains not?
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
I will not debate with you any further. Historians from all over the world already debated and they clearly proved we are the descendants of the Dacians and Romans. You are or brainwashed or you simply don't want to accept the truth. But you should try to read some real history books, you still may have a chance. Seriously, your questions are silly and historians answered to them long time ago so it's pointless talk about them over and over again.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago 5
@LaurentziusRo88 Yes. Until you do not present the cemeteries of the romanians lived in Transilvania before the XII century we can not speak about the topic. I presented you a map with the places where hundreds of hudreds gepida artefacts, tombs,. cemeteries were found.
from the IV-VI century. I do not mention the avars, huns,,, etc...You can present me the romanian artefacts from the IV-XII century... 800 years compared to 300.
... I have time... I am patient. Do not give it up!!!
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 the artefacts as told by the romanian historiants to be daco-romanian artefatcs are not accepted by the historiants. And not only the hungarians but from everywhere in europe.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 For example I want one village name that has daco-romanian origin whitout any questions.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 I also want to have a christin cemetery! only one!!! Once the romanians are speaking about the donarium once the burials....
One church I would like to see what was used continously.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 One gold mine or other mine I would like to see that was used continously.
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 On settlement I would like to see that was used continously
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 "I'm a Daco-Roman...no signs of Hungarians in Transylvania yet" I see you did not loss your humor! That is ok! Without the tatoo is ok!!! but not only one body...It is not possible to compare... Like the gepida tombs clearly can be identificatd....
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@LaurentziusRo88 Please tell me where can I find in Encyclopaedia Britannica the artefacts?
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@gabi090z If you are a liitle bit at home of the probability calculation, how ca you explain the shortage of the artefacts? How? There is no ONE that definitelly can be told had been made by the romanians.,. Even NO ONE!!!
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
@gabi090z And I do not speak about the linguistic....Even that can not support the continuity theory...
MrFefefofo 2 years ago
I really think you need to calm down!
You sound like your a hater! To bad now its part of Romania! Nothing you can do about it, but stop being rude!
MegaStrigoi 2 years ago 2
very truthful and yes I been there
GenNewSence 2 years ago 2
Very nice video! I'm proud to be Romanian!
MegaStrigoi 2 years ago 5
@MegaStrigoi Don't be!!!!!
hungarian6568 2 years ago
Why would you say that?
So i should say to you,don't be proud to be Hungarian?
MegaStrigoi 2 years ago
Pentru toti ungurii prosti care cunosc si limba romana: 1.Valahi este denumirea data de catre germani vorbitorilor de limba latina la nord si sud de Dunare dupa 1100,dacii au trait dintotdeauna pe aceste meleaguri,desi ne-au invadat si slavii dupa plecare Aureliana din 271! 2.Rumani este o clasa sociala ce reprezinta taranul roman legat de pamantul pe care il muncea,Mavrocordat a desfiintat aceasta clasa! 3.Tiganii alcatuiesc cel mult 5% din populatia Romaniei,la unguri ei formeaza 20% din pop!
RomaniaMar3 2 years ago 3
Romania was the shield of entire Europe.
piciustein 2 years ago 2
Transylvania was once the nucleus of the Kingdom of Dacia (82 BC106 AD). In ancient geography, especially in Roman sources, Dacia was the land in East-Central Europe inhabited by the Dacians.The Dacians, situated north of the lower Danube in the area of the Carpathians and Transylvania, are the earliest named people from the present territory of Romania. (Wikipedia).
eurosergiu 2 years ago
its ´the best gypsy nation in the world
greetings ethnic Romanians (Roma people)
TurkishNationalism 2 years ago
@TurkishNationalism
and Turkey is the best Christian country in the world
mihaigg 2 years ago
After what i saw in your country turks resemble more like gypsies than romanians.And let's not forget gypsies were brought in Romania by the Otoman empire and the Russian empire to control us better,but didn't succeeded ,who had gypsies before us?Do not insult my country ever again!
RomaniaMar3 2 years ago 4
Nici Elena Udrea cu milioanele de euro "cheltuie'' anapoda nu a facut asa frumoasa prezentare despre Romania....
Sm0ke2008 2 years ago 8
no lol :P im not like that. i just wish to tell the truth to all those who think they know it but they dont. ;)
RODragoshRO 2 years ago
But i cant stand this comparison : 1 Gypsie = Romanian thus All Gypsies = Romanians thus All Romanians = Gypsies. Nope. We do have gypsies, but they are not even 10% of the romanian populace. Because of this you DONT HAVE THE RIGHT to call all romanians gypsies. You have gypsies too. How would you be if everybody called all your nation gypsies ? I`m sure you would do the same thing i do now which is teaching the others a lesson of history.
RODragoshRO 2 years ago 6
Population* tho its not history lesson.
Despotaca 2 years ago
to some it is a history lesson for others its not :P about population im human :P all humans make mistakes
RODragoshRO 2 years ago
I thought you were overexcited someone insulted your country so you were in a rush to speak wise to that person, sorry. Tho if you wanna talk about history, talk about WW2 :D
Despotaca 2 years ago
They established here so we never were any of them. If they established in romania they became romanians , if they established in hungary they became hungarians. Thus you have no right to call us gypsies nor do we have that right either.
RODragoshRO 2 years ago
Then came the Dacians , Thracians , Geto-Dacians wich are all our ancestors. Yet WHO ARE HUNGARIAN ANCESTORS? Atilla the hun invaded europe and he came from mongolia so that means mongolian ancestors are hungarian ancestors too. And the east european civilisations i assure you they werent gypsies. They were slavic people same as russians. Gypsies came from India.
RODragoshRO 2 years ago 3
I mean we have it back
alex01mmm 2 years ago
We are not gipsy, retard hungarian, transilvania is romania territory then hungar stole it, thats all you know to do, then we have war and not we have back transilvania ha ! Haha
alex01mmm 2 years ago
stolen fields...
viktorin1987 2 years ago
hahahaha look whos talking ... the mongol invader says we stole the fields when he invaded our fields long after we claimed them... admit it damn hungarian we were here before you so you have no right to say we stolen anything for you since you arrived after us wich means YOU STOLE FROM US !!!
RODragoshRO 2 years ago 4
mongol invader is your mother, rromanians history was writed by lair gipsy rromanians, romanians are gipsy albanian sheephards, go back in Oltenia gipsys, transylvania was build by hungarians, only the rubbish is your ! RROMAnians are gipsys of europe
ErdelyMagyar76 2 years ago
i have nothing personal to hungarians at all. however there are 2 types of them. 1 are junk and 2 are friendly. I personally live in transylvania and have a lot of hungarian friends which i have fun with. But i cant stand the junk type. You all say you build transylvania and all. WE ARE HERE SINCE BEFORE THE FIRST ICE AGE. Yes cavemen but not gypsies yet.
RODragoshRO 2 years ago
for frankyg70 ....franky you are very wrong all that you say there is shit please dont compare the romanian with the gypsys that steel and lie yes? because the true romanian people arent like you discribed us if you want the truth lets face it 60% of microsoft is full with romanian bill gates would be now a big ZERO without romanians...all the big stars have at least one romanian by their side,the romanian invented the pen,the first jetplane,the insuline and so many and please try to make
uefantasticu 2 years ago 5
i still remember what my teacher once said: One thing you need to know about Romania and Romanian people: "They'r lying and stealing, they did, they do, and will do for ever!" No offense, but in the U.S.A. (at least in Texas) people don't like Romanians
FranKyG70 2 years ago
Then you need to change your teacher. What would you think if I said "Texans are all inbred gay cowboys"? No offense intended :P.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago 7
You can say that if you want, i'm not native american, I'm Hungarian, but my american theacher said that =)
FranKyG70 2 years ago
LOL you're Hungarian. Yet when I said that almost all people who insult Romania on YT are Hungarian, they say I'm paranoiac. Fortunately it seems I'm right. I cannot trust your objectivity, therefore spare us your lies. I can say that my let's say Japanese teacher said the same about Hungarians. Anyway i think you're so stupid that you would hang yourself if your teacher told so.
LaurentziusRo88 2 years ago 4
Lol . You're hungaryan . TRANSILVANIA PAMANT ROMANESC ! :)
shobb1 2 years ago 8
People in USA are very stupid. They were, they are and they will always be stupid (at least in Texas). P.S.: George Bush was raised in Texas, it is a good example.
eurosergiu 2 years ago 4
@eurosergiu
Listen if someone is not interested in geography or history,doesn't necessary make him/her a stupid...but a landlord/business man or a politician...
Salutari din Dallas!
cymonette 2 years ago
romanulantiue te annyira hülye vagy, mint a seggem. Gondolom olyan jól tudsz románul is mint angolul... szánalom vagy, valami 15 éves hülye kopasz romaromán lehetsz....
Wizzurah 2 years ago
Haha, very "surprizing" indeed.
3Mpy 2 years ago 2
Erdély sosem lesz a tietek!
decius51 2 years ago
akselaiesec all what you are saing is true
men191919 2 years ago
VIVAD ROMANIAA!!!!!!
Bastard´s hungaryan bad people, gypsy....i fuck hungary...and i fuck gypsy hungaryan and gypsy romanian...fuck this world!!!
romanulantiue 2 years ago
Comment removed
Sme3dy 2 years ago
:O:O
Transylvania isn't romanian. Cut it out from the video. Thanks in advance. Liar bastards.
streetdavid16 2 years ago
az oláh kokeróknak biztos bejön ez, de miért ez a sok fehér a videón?ruténektől kérték a fehérbőrű szinészeket?:D főleg a strandos jelenet, fehéríteni kellett a gippókon XD
patkanyirtokommando 2 years ago
actually, this is Romania. All you Hungarian bastards trying to steal our pride and glory better turn to something else. Matei Corvin, the one that built the Hunedoara Castle, and the one that rulled over Hungary for years was a 100% Romanian. Better start reading some history before making a fool out of yourselfs, my 'friendly' neighbours.
akselaiesec 2 years ago 8
absolutely true ...
cyb3rmonk 2 years ago 3
Ez Erdély nem romania.
This video is in Erdély, and Erdély not romania.
Justice for HUngary!!!
fcbjanko 2 years ago
Szánalmas ez a video. :S Más tollával ékeskedni?! :S
Slack87 2 years ago 2
Ezaz mi felépítettük ti meg dicsekedtek vele erre vagytok jók ^^
guysok 2 years ago 3
nehogymár a vajdahunyad vára román kincs legyen
F3Kazu 2 years ago 6
Gagyi. Milyen az Erdélyünkben, "kedves" román "barátaim"?
BL1224RD 2 years ago 2
great video and good music;)
Hunedoara was a bit funny b/c it is a fully hungarian castle but it is ok :)
falilampa 2 years ago
Romania is amazing and simply so lovely.
romanianslav3 2 years ago
imaginile de pe litoralul marii negre nu sunt realiste....trebuie sa recunoastem
ailimafame 2 years ago
0:52 Superman is indeed Romanian.
talesdian 2 years ago
LOL ! That looks more like Dracula mixed with Superman !!! : )
emillio94 2 years ago 3
Romania este o tara plina de oameni destepti dar este condusa de o mana de oameni prosti.
Salutari din Cluj-Napoca! oras 100% romanesc ca tot restul Ardealul
mircea93cj 2 years ago 6
In Romania predomina , din pacate, prostimea , valorile fug ca sunt coplesite de prostia din tara , din cauza asta suntem undem suntem , din cauza asta ilici ne-a condus(in prapastie) atatia ani , de asta basescu ne vinde la fmi pt un secol.
davazno1 2 years ago
ВАУ!!!!!!!! ТАКОЙ ВОЛШЕБНЫЙ КЛИП!!!! СУПЕР!! КРАСОТИЩА!!!!
OlyaMorandi 2 years ago
foarte frumoase toate clipurile:
iuzzuliku 2 years ago
Romania is a beautifull country , unfortunately its inhabited... pun pariu ca ati auzit asta de multe ori , si o sa auziti in continuare , romania este intradevar printre cele mai frumoase tari din lume din unele puncte de vedere , dar cat timp locuiesc dobitoci in ea , o sa ramana la fel in ochii lumii cum este si acuma , adica o a 2-a Somalie... nu ma refer la dobitoci la modul "toti romanii" , doar aproximativ 80% din ei , acei retardati mintali care strica imaginea tarii
PureHatr3d 2 years ago 5
@PureHatr3d
in mare parte ai dreptate , dar nu cred ca e vb ca locuiesc dobitoci in ea cat este condusa de dobitoci
indobitocirea se face in masa prin ceea ce se da la tv si prin lipsa de cultura mai incepan de la cei tineri pana la cei in varsta
oana198714 2 years ago 3
exact ce vroiam si eu sa spun , doar ca nu m-am exprimat corect :)
PureHatr3d 2 years ago
O da! Superba civilizatie banateana! Exact ceea ce spuneam. Merci mult ca mi-ai confirmat teoria. Noi suntem mitici, lasa-ne in prostia noastra. Dar voi va bateti cu pumnul in piept degeaba. Ca maimutele.
haiducs 2 years ago
:)) Esti amuzant rau de tot baiete. Nu exista comparatie intre Arad si Timisoara, te cred ca esti aradean, dar totusi sa fim un pic realisti...Timisoara in zilele ei mai proaste nu o sa arate asa de prost cum arata Aradul. Am inteles ca e in renovare acuma, Aradul, asa ca sa speram ca o sa arate superb, dar nu exista om pe lumea asta care sa fi vizitat Aradul si Timisoara si sa fie de acord cu afirmatia ta(doar daca, la fel ca tine, e aradean din ala cu ura pe Timisoara)Oricum, o zi buna. ;)
nirolfino 2 years ago
Nu sunt aradean. Sunt, mai rau, bucurestean (sau cum se zice pe la voi, "mitic"). Am vizitat si Tm anul trecut. Se vede ca a fost frumos CANDVA, dar cladirile abandonate, Bega imputita si nesistematizata, tiganii, unele magazine care arata exact cum aratau pe vremea comunistilor, drumurile proaste, autobuzele si tramvaiele vechi fac ca Timisoara sa fie departe de a fi un oras frumos.Asta e adevarul,si decat sa va simtiti lezati,ca tare fuduli mai sunteti,mai bine ati pune mana sa schimbati ceva.
haiducs 2 years ago
Si da, recunosc si pe unii timisoreni in descrierea ta (sunt moldovean crescut in Timisoara) sa vezi ce injuraturi imi iau acuma de la concetateni :P Dar nu toti sunt asa. De 4 ani nu mai locuiesc in tara, dar o vizitez cu regularitate si de fiecare data sunt fericit cand vad Timisoara. Nu e cum zici, se construieste si se repara. Si sincer induci publicul in eroare, avem cea mai noua flota de autobuze din tara,mai noua ca B. chiar, magazine vechi,sunt,dupa cum sunt si in B.(chiar pe Magheru)
nirolfino 2 years ago
Si nu, nu am ura pe Timisoara, ci pe timisoreni. Am stat de vorba cu multi, nu sunteti baieti rai, dar sunteti ingamfati si supremul vostru argument este "civilizatia" banateana, aia care nu exista decat ca sa va laudati voi cu ea. In plus mai exista un curent de opinie pe acolo, cum ca Timisoara n-ar fi in Romania (bine, n-aveti decat sa va credeti in continuare vienezi daca aveti chef). Prin urmare, m-am cam lamurit cum e cu TImisoara voastra.
haiducs 2 years ago
Ups am dat-o din rau in mai rau...glumesc, stai calm. Va cunosc pe voi miticii, am vizitat si eu capitala de cateva ori, si contrar indoctrinarii mele de banatean am gasit-o interesanta, frumoasa pe alocuri, interesanta in altele, dar oamenii o strica(nu ma refer la tine) si nici la cele nspe mii de neamuri pe care le am pe acolo sau oamenii de treaba de acolo, dar in general sunteti toti intr-o viteza, fara rabdare sau bunul simt de a cere scuze(de exemplu cand ma lovesti din spate cu carutul)
nirolfino 2 years ago
Suntem grabiti pentru ca in general, in toate orasele mari din lume, viata are alt ritm. Pana termina ardeleanul si banateanul de mestecat slana mie mi-a venit de 10 ori metroul. Multi suntem asa cum spui, dar lipsa de bun simt e problema generala in Romania, nu in Bucuresti. Iar bucurestenii nu prea imping ei caruturi. Taranii veniti din toate colturile tarii, multi adusi chiar de Ceausescu sa-i lucreze in intreprinderi, poate.
haiducs 2 years ago
Pana la urma monopilzam toate comentariile de la clipul asta. Era un carucior intr-un supermarket. Si crede-ma ca stiu ce inseamna viteza din metropole, dar totusi, un scuze, un te rog frumos...inca se zice....eu am fost marcat prima oara cand am fost in Buceresti acuma 6 ani de zile si mi s-a intamplat asta...probabil am avut o zi mai proasta, dar am ramas un pic dezamagit de bucresteni, ma repet nu vreau sa generalizez, pentru ca am si prieteni buni acolo. Dar ca sa incheiem pe un ton amical
nirolfino 2 years ago