This video proves nothing; it doesn't show what the man was talking about. Read the history of US foreign intervention. The United States overthrew Iran's democratically elected government in the 1950's. Next came Guatemala. Do a quick read on wikipedia about those incidents, and the results that came out of them. Those are just the first two nations the CIA overthrew. The USA is spreading misery throughout the world. Wake up. Hillary is an imperialist warmongerer.
"If you want to remain on this detail, get your F-ing ass over here & grab those bags" (Hillary to a SS Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident, from the book The First Partner by Joyce Milton). "Stay the F back, stay the F away from me! Don't come w/in 10 yards of me, or else! Just F-ing do as I say, Okay" (Hillary screaming at her SS detail, from the book Unlimited Access, by FBI Agent Gary Aldrich).
Unless these authors are all lying, Hillary is a much harder person than we have been allowed to see from the mainstream media as it hypes her candidacy.
"F-off! It's enough that I have to see you sh**-kickers every day, I'm not going to talk to you too! Just do your G-damn job and keep your mouth shut" (Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with "Good morning," from the book American Evita by Christopher Andersen).
Wake up Americans! Stop letting Murdoch's Fox News tell YOU who to vote for and start thinking CLEARLY for yourself!
Hillary will ensure that the war continues unabated, health care will remain in the hands of the medical mafia, and the lion's share of revenues will continue to go to ruling transnational investors who finance our political campaigns at the expense of the public interest. She is owned by and obliged to corporate/special interests.
Where was the attack? "I respect your research"???? Was that the attack? "I apologize"??? Was that it? "I would be happy to get your name" in order to get more information???? She explained why she gave the response, apologized, and clarified, after be interrupted her and acted like a baby.
This is politics, not kindergarten. He acted like a patsy, but she still respected him. I fail to see the attack. Are we watching the same footage? Elaborate what exactly you mean, because your blanket statement says to me you don't know what you're talking about, you're just jumping on a bandwagon.
She simply attempted to call a possible spade a spade, and when she was told she was wrong, she graciously apologized and offered the man a copy of the bill he took issue with. The fact that she had already answered a xerox copy of the very question 3 times previously makes the guy's claim that he "researched" a little suspicious. How then, in his "research", did he not already find the answer to "his" question, thereby making his asking it moot at best, laden with ulterior motive at worst
Bottom line, how does agreeing that an organization is terroristic in nature equate to giving agreen light to attacking said organization? Casting a vote in agreement that an organization is dangerous is irrelevant when it comes to the question of whether you're okay with actually taking military action against them. What such a vote DOES do is open the door for a diplomacy oriented person Hillary) to give some priority to opening up the gates of dialogue with said organization,
(from above)with the goal of reducing or eliminating their desire to be a threat to us/the world. Any person who thinks the issue through rationally can see that. This man didn't therefore making the question seem nothing more than controversy baiting. Then he acts like a baby about it, after a perfect apology. That speaks volumes in itself. It seems to me the guy wouldn't have been so offended had Hillary not been dead on right.
This video proves nothing; it doesn't show what the man was talking about. Read the history of US foreign intervention. The United States overthrew Iran's democratically elected government in the 1950's. Next came Guatemala. Do a quick read on wikipedia about those incidents, and the results that came out of them. Those are just the first two nations the CIA overthrew. The USA is spreading misery throughout the world. Wake up. Hillary is an imperialist warmongerer.
undeadpresident 4 years ago
Hillary is tested and ready! Let's make it happen!
kdTV2Lvr 4 years ago
Hillary is an AIPAC puppet
oldjoe5 4 years ago 4
he's dead now
oohay4 4 years ago
Why is the man's question edited out? Why is the video cut out in the middle? Trying to make Hilary look good maybe?
Let's see the whole thing.
pbcinla 4 years ago 2
barack obama and ron paul 2008!
i3allplaya 4 years ago
"If you want to remain on this detail, get your F-ing ass over here & grab those bags" (Hillary to a SS Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident, from the book The First Partner by Joyce Milton). "Stay the F back, stay the F away from me! Don't come w/in 10 yards of me, or else! Just F-ing do as I say, Okay" (Hillary screaming at her SS detail, from the book Unlimited Access, by FBI Agent Gary Aldrich).
abernatchie 4 years ago
Believe only half of what you see and NONE of what you hear.
kdTV2Lvr 4 years ago
Unless these authors are all lying, Hillary is a much harder person than we have been allowed to see from the mainstream media as it hypes her candidacy.
"F-off! It's enough that I have to see you sh**-kickers every day, I'm not going to talk to you too! Just do your G-damn job and keep your mouth shut" (Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with "Good morning," from the book American Evita by Christopher Andersen).
abernatchie 4 years ago
The King is finally about to be dethroned & you're ready to let a Queen (Madam Hillary) (another snake) in the door?
abernatchie 4 years ago
Wake up Americans! Stop letting Murdoch's Fox News tell YOU who to vote for and start thinking CLEARLY for yourself!
Hillary will ensure that the war continues unabated, health care will remain in the hands of the medical mafia, and the lion's share of revenues will continue to go to ruling transnational investors who finance our political campaigns at the expense of the public interest. She is owned by and obliged to corporate/special interests.
abernatchie 4 years ago 2
too bad his information was faulty
sepulvedaj3 4 years ago
too bad YOUR information was faulty...
botchalism 4 years ago
oh such a snappy comeback! you should be a writer for a late night comedy show with your high level of intellect in relation to comedy and snark.
sepulvedaj3 4 years ago
Your mom is a snark....
botchalism 4 years ago
Where was the attack? "I respect your research"???? Was that the attack? "I apologize"??? Was that it? "I would be happy to get your name" in order to get more information???? She explained why she gave the response, apologized, and clarified, after be interrupted her and acted like a baby.
chipsalom 4 years ago
This is politics, not kindergarten. He acted like a patsy, but she still respected him. I fail to see the attack. Are we watching the same footage? Elaborate what exactly you mean, because your blanket statement says to me you don't know what you're talking about, you're just jumping on a bandwagon.
chipsalom 4 years ago
Of course it was a ;egitimate question, at what point did she say it wasn't? She didn't treat it like an illegitimate question. (cont'd below)
chipsalom 4 years ago
She simply attempted to call a possible spade a spade, and when she was told she was wrong, she graciously apologized and offered the man a copy of the bill he took issue with. The fact that she had already answered a xerox copy of the very question 3 times previously makes the guy's claim that he "researched" a little suspicious. How then, in his "research", did he not already find the answer to "his" question, thereby making his asking it moot at best, laden with ulterior motive at worst
chipsalom 4 years ago
Bottom line, how does agreeing that an organization is terroristic in nature equate to giving agreen light to attacking said organization? Casting a vote in agreement that an organization is dangerous is irrelevant when it comes to the question of whether you're okay with actually taking military action against them. What such a vote DOES do is open the door for a diplomacy oriented person Hillary) to give some priority to opening up the gates of dialogue with said organization,
chipsalom 4 years ago
(from above)with the goal of reducing or eliminating their desire to be a threat to us/the world. Any person who thinks the issue through rationally can see that. This man didn't therefore making the question seem nothing more than controversy baiting. Then he acts like a baby about it, after a perfect apology. That speaks volumes in itself. It seems to me the guy wouldn't have been so offended had Hillary not been dead on right.
chipsalom 4 years ago
That was a perfectly legitimate question.
odh202 4 years ago 2
Hillary handled that missinformed man with grace, intelligence and calm.. YOU GO GIRL! GO HILLARY!
Jadedbylife 4 years ago