@TheFACTSRUS there there muffin its ok.. the movement looks too mechanical how it spins then stops dead, then spins the other way & stops dead.. it just looks like it snaps to a stop each time... So can you explain to me why it does that in your professional opinion please moron?..
The moon is not rotating.. The LEM is moving around the moon.. But the shadows of the LEM is not changed? Why? Maybe early blue screen tech? We never went to the moon. Cold War hoax.
@kristianheidi right and the same president wasn´t even able to keep a few people breaking into a hotel room a secret... Nixon. that was nothing compared to the magnitude of the moonlandings. get over it, we went to the moon.
@maffoid No.. Do you believe that in 1969 the US really send a 3 stage rocket to the moon and back? Build by an Nazi scientist? It will be even a big challenge today for NASA. I believe that The Saturn V/5 rocket was send in orbit and 8 days later a capsule went into the pacific . And with no radiation from Van Allen belt. Do your research!
@kristianheidi lol, you are the one who has to do his research. that is impossible what you claim. the UdssR, England, Australia, dozens of private organisations tracked the vessel from earth to the moon and back. people even eavesdropped to the moonchatter via a receiver pointed DIRECTLY at the moon. The Russians would have been the first to call the hoax. the evidence is overwelming, there is no chance it was a fake.
It is actually idiotic to question the moonlanding nowadays.
@kristianheidi furthermore India, Europe, China, Russia and Japan have placed bots on the moon. And from an unmanned landing it is only a very small step to a manned landing. Only thing you need is a life support system.
Sorry if I was a bit harsh, but the amount of bullshit I get from some paranoid scientifically illiterate people just gets to me sometimes ^^
@kristianheidi I know that van braun was a high ranking nnazi officer. But you gotta know that the third reich actually enforced an idea very widely spread back then. Eugenics was on the uprise (Thank god the holocaust has brought it to an end).
Nevertheless the united states were smart enough to see the potential in these persons despite their brainwashed minds from the nazi regime.
@maffoid Did you know that he theoised a classic UFO back in 1955? In a series on the future space with walt disney as illustrator he explaned the planes for the future NASA. Back in 1955 there were no NASA it was the us army space agency.
See more on my blog: ufoblog.kristianbothomsen.dk. :-)
@kristianheidi I used to be very interested into flying saucers. But the problem is there is hardly any "real research" facts available. I´ve heard about them testing these kinds of flight-methods. Science fiction has been a source for various kinds of research. Just look at what is done at particle beaming.
But as I am a believer in facts I try to stick with what is possible to prove.
On the other hand I believe that anything we can imagine can somehow become a reality someday.
@maffoid "But the problem is there is hardly any "real research" facts available" That is absoluty right. But my passion is to prove they exist or not. Are the UFOs military ultra top secret or is it alien. I think both. But my believe is that they are a product of the US military. Im still looking for real proof. But what is in this digital world?
@kristianheidi exactly. you can not prove anything with research on the internet. The possibility of faking something for your own cause can be done so easily and has been done over and over throughout the decades of our digital world.
Proving something like this is in my opinion close to impossible. And the question for me is, if they are of alien source. why would government hide that? Mass panic can not be the reason since a lot of people seem to "know" it and do not panic lol
@kristianheidi there have been people who watched the vessel approach the moon, vanish behind it and reappear on the other side via a regular telescope. please, I would love to know how they could have possibly managed to fake that. Ah and there are several mirrors on the moon. NO chance that it would have been placed by bots since the russians tried several times but NEVER succeeded in placing them so they would actually work...
@maffoid Please give me a link to a tracking list from the USSR. I havent seen it. It will be very interesting. It seems that you got a good knowledge of the Apollo 11 landing. I like to here more.
@kristianheidi I do not have a tracking list/link for that. but I mean if you think about it the UdSSR lost the cold war due to the fact that america was first on the moon. So if there was any chance it was fake, they would have known. (golden age of spies, I am sure they infiltrated the NASA with KGB agents. The evidence is overwelming like I said. Take a look at nasas homepage. the LRO even took pictures of the landing sites. The research they are doing is amazing
@kristianheidi ah and.. Nazi scientist.. well it was a scientist working in the nazi regime, yes.. but that does not mean his research is not valid. Have you ever boarded a plane? yep, it was Messerschmit who made it possible since he invented the jet-engine. the same nazi scientist you just mentioned.
@maffoid Nein! It was Sir Frank Whittle from England who invented the jet engine- If he hadn't been ignored at the time, we'd have had a jet figher in time for the Battle of Britain..
@nosajj12345 Jason, perhaps one should contemplate on this possibilty now and then. But please have a look at this video from 2:00 onwards. A few times. The abrupt movements, even sideways and rotational are just not possible. (the "lunar module" supposedly was more than 10000 pound. And the flashes, as we can see the wide beam, are clearly fake. Peace.
Most of the noise of a rocket engine is created by friction between the exhaust and the surrounding atmosphere while the thing is in an atmosphere. There was no atmosphere to create any noise in the first place. That's why you can't hear it..
.
And the thing is only lifting about 2,000 pounds, so it's not a very big motor.
the moment when they take off 0:32, and ascend.... the cabin view is missing/interrupted later an "orbital view" is shown from underneath the cabin, how many cameras were on the craft upon take off?
If the missions were faked, don't you hoaxers think that the people at NASA would have edited out anything that would have given them up. These men were rocket scientists after all. Thats a euphemism for "someone smarter than your dumb asses." With our nations reputation at stake, wouldn't NASA have taken the time to edit out the fake suns, wires, errant shadows and all that other crap before releasing the films? You really think they'd leave so much evidence?
The engine actually was extremely simple and reliable. Unless one of the tanks was somehow breached or something, it was basically impossible for it to fail. There are two tanks, one of Dinitrogen tetroxide and the other of Aerozine-50 (a combination of hydrazine and umdh) The engine is just a chamber where the two mix. Open the valves and the two flow into the chamber and ignite on contact.
Just a few years ago the highest office in the world couldn't keep an incident involving an intern, a cigar and an Oval Office a secret, and you moon hoax idots think they could keep a secret involving over 400,000 people and 6 lunar "Faked" missions a secret. Get over it. Plus they just recently took pictures of the equipment sitting on the moon. So move on with your lame theories.
The moon in this (and every other lunar launch vid)never gets further away but just continually scrolls and scrolls across the obscured view of an angular shadow, to which the interior is NEVER revealed. Nor can any sign of life be observed through the clouded portals of the approaching lander from the point of view of the CSM, because it is a dead lifeless smaller scale model being shifted on metal cables or wires.
Why would you need to see the inside of the CSM? What use is that to Huston for a docking tape? Remember that Apollo 11 films are not for entertainment, they are purely telemetry.
Who would think that you would be able to see into the LEM? The sun is creating a glare on the windows.
yadsik, I was going through my archives and saw your uninformed response to my post. TELEMETRY??!! The Telemetry records have all been lost acording to NASA. How in the world do you think you get telemetry information from videos???
I like that double exposure effect white streak, nice touch but inadequate. It looks like the giant sphericle model that was on a rotating stand that has since been destroyed for some reason.
Funny how we can never see inside the Lunar cockpit like we did back in '69. It was really clear video but it looked fake as if you were in a booth inside a moon set. Neil had a serious look on his face, but there is no sign of any of that footage. Now it is all obscure and blurred. And they were standing straight up on their feet durring lunar launch.
Save your keyboard buddy. It doesnt matter what evidence you show, people believe what they feel like. To me it is laughable and shows how dumb people are to think they havent been duped.
But then thats the ignorant masses and the paid shepherds on youtube who are there to herd the ones who go astray back into line.
Well then that means that there are some really bad people who believe in maintaining lies as their instrument of communication to the masses and their means of conveying understanding of a fabricated reality to the people. Hmmm, who does the Bible say is the father of all lies?..... Hmmm...
The video is time-lapsed, it is taken from high altitude, when the craft is already moving horizontally or even has attained orbit. The audio and video aren't in sync.
ah man, you again, again your claims are easily refutable
1)not all craters are the same size
2)poor video quality
3)if they were close to the craters wouldn't they appear to have more detail? as opposed to farther away? also, there is no atmosphere on the moon to blur distant objects
4)there is no air resistance slow their accent, plus they only have to fight 1/6 of Earth's gravity
5)i usually question the authenticity of most of these videos on youtube
Funny how the cemera is edited to censor the "blastoff". Funny how the LEM appears to be swinging from a rope, back and forth. Funny how the LEM has no seats, just standing room only. Funny how the rocket 6 inches from their legs is totally silent. Funny how the LEM had no rocket exhaust from any orifice.
It's like "you people" haven't made a study of Apollo at all.
Because things don't "look" the way you think they ought to you claim hoax.
You've been in space (apparently) how should the LM's motion appear?..why should they have seats when weight and room were constant issues?...why should they hear a rocket whose chemical action is OUTSIDE the space craft in a fucking vacuum (silence)?...why should you be able to see a plume from the LM motor?
I can understand misspelling Alternative once, since this is the internet, but missspelling it a whooping 3 times has to be some kind of record.
ldanley72 4 weeks ago
This film is highly sped up. It was actually much slower than this in real time.
vise357 8 months ago
hahaha thats a model
KungFriedChicken 10 months ago 2
@KungFriedChicken Moron!
TheFACTSRUS 10 months ago
@TheFACTSRUS there there muffin its ok.. the movement looks too mechanical how it spins then stops dead, then spins the other way & stops dead.. it just looks like it snaps to a stop each time... So can you explain to me why it does that in your professional opinion please moron?..
KungFriedChicken 10 months ago
@KungFriedChicken Of course it's a "model" . It's the Lunar Model (Module) !
vise357 8 months ago
The moon is not rotating.. The LEM is moving around the moon.. But the shadows of the LEM is not changed? Why? Maybe early blue screen tech? We never went to the moon. Cold War hoax.
kristianheidi 1 year ago
@kristianheidi right and the same president wasn´t even able to keep a few people breaking into a hotel room a secret... Nixon. that was nothing compared to the magnitude of the moonlandings. get over it, we went to the moon.
maffoid 1 year ago
@maffoid No.. Do you believe that in 1969 the US really send a 3 stage rocket to the moon and back? Build by an Nazi scientist? It will be even a big challenge today for NASA. I believe that The Saturn V/5 rocket was send in orbit and 8 days later a capsule went into the pacific . And with no radiation from Van Allen belt. Do your research!
kristianheidi 1 year ago
@kristianheidi lol, you are the one who has to do his research. that is impossible what you claim. the UdssR, England, Australia, dozens of private organisations tracked the vessel from earth to the moon and back. people even eavesdropped to the moonchatter via a receiver pointed DIRECTLY at the moon. The Russians would have been the first to call the hoax. the evidence is overwelming, there is no chance it was a fake.
It is actually idiotic to question the moonlanding nowadays.
maffoid 1 year ago
@maffoid It is so easy to write this. Now that you dont know me.
kristianheidi 1 year ago
@kristianheidi furthermore India, Europe, China, Russia and Japan have placed bots on the moon. And from an unmanned landing it is only a very small step to a manned landing. Only thing you need is a life support system.
Sorry if I was a bit harsh, but the amount of bullshit I get from some paranoid scientifically illiterate people just gets to me sometimes ^^
maffoid 1 year ago
@kristianheidi I know that van braun was a high ranking nnazi officer. But you gotta know that the third reich actually enforced an idea very widely spread back then. Eugenics was on the uprise (Thank god the holocaust has brought it to an end).
Nevertheless the united states were smart enough to see the potential in these persons despite their brainwashed minds from the nazi regime.
maffoid 1 year ago
@kristianheidi *edit SS officer
maffoid 1 year ago
@maffoid Did you know that he theoised a classic UFO back in 1955? In a series on the future space with walt disney as illustrator he explaned the planes for the future NASA. Back in 1955 there were no NASA it was the us army space agency.
See more on my blog: ufoblog.kristianbothomsen.dk. :-)
kristianheidi 1 year ago
@kristianheidi I used to be very interested into flying saucers. But the problem is there is hardly any "real research" facts available. I´ve heard about them testing these kinds of flight-methods. Science fiction has been a source for various kinds of research. Just look at what is done at particle beaming.
But as I am a believer in facts I try to stick with what is possible to prove.
On the other hand I believe that anything we can imagine can somehow become a reality someday.
maffoid 1 year ago
@maffoid "But the problem is there is hardly any "real research" facts available" That is absoluty right. But my passion is to prove they exist or not. Are the UFOs military ultra top secret or is it alien. I think both. But my believe is that they are a product of the US military. Im still looking for real proof. But what is in this digital world?
kristianheidi 1 year ago
@kristianheidi exactly. you can not prove anything with research on the internet. The possibility of faking something for your own cause can be done so easily and has been done over and over throughout the decades of our digital world.
Proving something like this is in my opinion close to impossible. And the question for me is, if they are of alien source. why would government hide that? Mass panic can not be the reason since a lot of people seem to "know" it and do not panic lol
maffoid 1 year ago
@kristianheidi there have been people who watched the vessel approach the moon, vanish behind it and reappear on the other side via a regular telescope. please, I would love to know how they could have possibly managed to fake that. Ah and there are several mirrors on the moon. NO chance that it would have been placed by bots since the russians tried several times but NEVER succeeded in placing them so they would actually work...
maffoid 1 year ago
@maffoid Please give me a link to a tracking list from the USSR. I havent seen it. It will be very interesting. It seems that you got a good knowledge of the Apollo 11 landing. I like to here more.
kristianheidi 1 year ago
@kristianheidi I do not have a tracking list/link for that. but I mean if you think about it the UdSSR lost the cold war due to the fact that america was first on the moon. So if there was any chance it was fake, they would have known. (golden age of spies, I am sure they infiltrated the NASA with KGB agents. The evidence is overwelming like I said. Take a look at nasas homepage. the LRO even took pictures of the landing sites. The research they are doing is amazing
maffoid 1 year ago
@kristianheidi ah and.. Nazi scientist.. well it was a scientist working in the nazi regime, yes.. but that does not mean his research is not valid. Have you ever boarded a plane? yep, it was Messerschmit who made it possible since he invented the jet-engine. the same nazi scientist you just mentioned.
maffoid 1 year ago
@maffoid He was a brilliant man. Von Braun was an SS officer. You dont get this rank if your not an hardcore Nazi member.
kristianheidi 1 year ago
@maffoid Nein! It was Sir Frank Whittle from England who invented the jet engine- If he hadn't been ignored at the time, we'd have had a jet figher in time for the Battle of Britain..
zzxxyy543 1 year ago
haha it's a toy, look at the jerky movements from 2:50 and further. And why do we see an entire beam of light from the flashes??(2:34)
losability 1 year ago
@losability "Haha it's a toy." Haha you're an idiot!!
nosajj12345 1 year ago
@nosajj12345 Jason, perhaps one should contemplate on this possibilty now and then. But please have a look at this video from 2:00 onwards. A few times. The abrupt movements, even sideways and rotational are just not possible. (the "lunar module" supposedly was more than 10000 pound. And the flashes, as we can see the wide beam, are clearly fake. Peace.
losability 1 year ago
Most of the noise of a rocket engine is created by friction between the exhaust and the surrounding atmosphere while the thing is in an atmosphere. There was no atmosphere to create any noise in the first place. That's why you can't hear it..
.
And the thing is only lifting about 2,000 pounds, so it's not a very big motor.
nesokretep 1 year ago
the moment when they take off 0:32, and ascend.... the cabin view is missing/interrupted later an "orbital view" is shown from underneath the cabin, how many cameras were on the craft upon take off?
modo501 1 year ago
If the missions were faked, don't you hoaxers think that the people at NASA would have edited out anything that would have given them up. These men were rocket scientists after all. Thats a euphemism for "someone smarter than your dumb asses." With our nations reputation at stake, wouldn't NASA have taken the time to edit out the fake suns, wires, errant shadows and all that other crap before releasing the films? You really think they'd leave so much evidence?
nosajj12345 1 year ago
The sound of the engines would have been heard inside the ATMOSPHERE of the LEM. The vibration would have been evident in an apollonots voice.
What we have is a dead dog, faked pig, and tax fraud of the highest order...
Anyone incapable of discening this is either completely lacking common sense, or deep in denial!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
The engine actually was extremely simple and reliable. Unless one of the tanks was somehow breached or something, it was basically impossible for it to fail. There are two tanks, one of Dinitrogen tetroxide and the other of Aerozine-50 (a combination of hydrazine and umdh) The engine is just a chamber where the two mix. Open the valves and the two flow into the chamber and ignite on contact.
DrBuzz0 2 years ago 8
I think Kubriks film making looked more realistic than NASAS attempt.
knelsond 2 years ago
Just a few years ago the highest office in the world couldn't keep an incident involving an intern, a cigar and an Oval Office a secret, and you moon hoax idots think they could keep a secret involving over 400,000 people and 6 lunar "Faked" missions a secret. Get over it. Plus they just recently took pictures of the equipment sitting on the moon. So move on with your lame theories.
RedZilla957 2 years ago 13
This has been flagged as spam show
@RedZilla957
Damn right you are.
Rob260259 8 months ago
@RedZilla957 they did took pictures of the decent stages? I didnt knew that, where can i see them?
Serpico261 7 months ago
the world is chock full of astronautical experts when it comes to claiming the moon landing is a hoax. then again, it's also chock full of idiots.
dilettantescorner 2 years ago 2
Ain't it funny how Apollo 11 lifts off and never leaves the lunar orbit of the moon !!
stillablaze 3 years ago
That is one bad looking Moon model that NASA used to fake this Apollo 11 LM Ascent film!
ArcAngel4Myke 3 years ago
The moon in this (and every other lunar launch vid)never gets further away but just continually scrolls and scrolls across the obscured view of an angular shadow, to which the interior is NEVER revealed. Nor can any sign of life be observed through the clouded portals of the approaching lander from the point of view of the CSM, because it is a dead lifeless smaller scale model being shifted on metal cables or wires.
imnazhole 3 years ago
Why would you need to see the inside of the CSM? What use is that to Huston for a docking tape? Remember that Apollo 11 films are not for entertainment, they are purely telemetry.
Who would think that you would be able to see into the LEM? The sun is creating a glare on the windows.
yadsik 2 years ago
yadsik, I was going through my archives and saw your uninformed response to my post. TELEMETRY??!! The Telemetry records have all been lost acording to NASA. How in the world do you think you get telemetry information from videos???
imnazhole 2 years ago
No, these are all telemetry.
yadsik 2 years ago
@imnazhole -- Why should the moon get "further away"?.
.
Do you even know what an orbit is?
nesokretep 1 year ago
I like that double exposure effect white streak, nice touch but inadequate. It looks like the giant sphericle model that was on a rotating stand that has since been destroyed for some reason.
imnazhole 3 years ago
Funny how we can never see inside the Lunar cockpit like we did back in '69. It was really clear video but it looked fake as if you were in a booth inside a moon set. Neil had a serious look on his face, but there is no sign of any of that footage. Now it is all obscure and blurred. And they were standing straight up on their feet durring lunar launch.
imnazhole 3 years ago
Save your keyboard buddy. It doesnt matter what evidence you show, people believe what they feel like. To me it is laughable and shows how dumb people are to think they havent been duped.
But then thats the ignorant masses and the paid shepherds on youtube who are there to herd the ones who go astray back into line.
thuddas 3 years ago 2
Well then that means that there are some really bad people who believe in maintaining lies as their instrument of communication to the masses and their means of conveying understanding of a fabricated reality to the people. Hmmm, who does the Bible say is the father of all lies?..... Hmmm...
imnazhole 2 years ago
Lame non-proof of jack shit.
grayhog86 3 years ago
You're kidding, this is your "proof".
Oh Lord you are simple.
grayhog86 3 years ago
Funny how any sane person could doubt the NINE trips made to the moon by the U.S. (including fly-arounds).
tubage07 3 years ago
The video is time-lapsed, it is taken from high altitude, when the craft is already moving horizontally or even has attained orbit. The audio and video aren't in sync.
hyperthreaded 4 years ago
Has anyone noticed that tiny meteor at 1:43?? Why is it bright if it's not being burnt up by any atmosphere?... d'oh
nickunderscore 4 years ago
cool video. pretty bad conditiion, but that's o.k. thanks for posting it.
1singlet 4 years ago
ah man, you again, again your claims are easily refutable
1)not all craters are the same size
2)poor video quality
3)if they were close to the craters wouldn't they appear to have more detail? as opposed to farther away? also, there is no atmosphere on the moon to blur distant objects
4)there is no air resistance slow their accent, plus they only have to fight 1/6 of Earth's gravity
5)i usually question the authenticity of most of these videos on youtube
ztisdale 4 years ago
Funny how the cemera is edited to censor the "blastoff". Funny how the LEM appears to be swinging from a rope, back and forth. Funny how the LEM has no seats, just standing room only. Funny how the rocket 6 inches from their legs is totally silent. Funny how the LEM had no rocket exhaust from any orifice.
apolloscam 4 years ago
It's like "you people" haven't made a study of Apollo at all.
Because things don't "look" the way you think they ought to you claim hoax.
You've been in space (apparently) how should the LM's motion appear?..why should they have seats when weight and room were constant issues?...why should they hear a rocket whose chemical action is OUTSIDE the space craft in a fucking vacuum (silence)?...why should you be able to see a plume from the LM motor?
Why? You ASS-u-me too much and KNOW zip.
grayhog86 3 years ago
maybe ask the Nauts who disagree whether you can hear the engines at take off from the moon, wise guy?
pt1gard 3 years ago
Why would you hear the engines which are outside of the simulated atmosphere?
yadsik 2 years ago
vibrations through the hull
alekivk 2 years ago
Funny how you have no basic understanding of science. You really are stupid.
joshatkins94 3 years ago