After those RFK comments from hillary, does anyone actually think that this would be a dream ticket? I think this would be a death ticket because hillary would have him killed.
You can always dig up dirt on any and every candidate. But go & try to find something negative about RON PAUL. You can't. Now ask yourself why there is only 1 GOP on the ballot. You can't vote for Ron Paul because he is against corrupt gov't. And this gov't is ot going to let him dominate the polls AND the election. If you believe anyhting that comes out of any of the candidates mouths, yoo're a sucka! "Read my lips NO NEW TAXES!"-"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"-W.M.D.'s? C'mon
I have to say I'm suprised. I thought Obama would dominate Clinton but she did end up pulling a couple of good arguments out. I like Obama's policy on immigration while Clinton gave a pretty good troop withdrawal statement. I will have a hard time at the caususes today.
a horable idea i don't want her face to be at the cash register at burger king
but if she was vice priz then they would just be bring the same old dirty money hogs back in instead he should say no and cut them out of the picture then no more dumb ass's in the white house
Democrats all the way, We the "D"s are nice, humble, generous, helpful and we want a change. I want a democrat to be in office on Jan 1/08 and I cannot stand a "R"at be in a chair just watching world news and veto good future amendments, I am had it with these fucking racist, rat, republicans. No matter who wins the "D" premilinaries, I go 4 the Democrats - Yes WE CAN ! Enough is Enough ... Time 4 a change - fuck the reps, Let's Go Democrats ... Go Blue State !
its clear from the republican debates that the old saying "choosing a lesser of two evils" comes from the republicans. its not until they join in that candidates have to resort to defending their character against mudslinging and (in the case of both of GWB's debates, flat out lies about what they say they can accomplish and what he actually can). clearly, the democrats have a greater respect for their opponents and it is DESERVED.
oskey22, its ignorant 4 u 2 say that republicans r racist when it was democrats who wanted to continue slavery and it was democrat senators who joined the kkk. where as it was the republicans who ended slavery and a republican president who signed the emancipation proclamatoin, united the country, and freed and gave citizenship to all slaves.
u can believe whatever bullshit u want oskey22, but what i said is a fact, but most liberals r uninformed and don't know their history so its nothing new. btw, i'm not mad.
Well i am sorry to state that this is not the classical government that you want to praise here.. but the modern government. Slavery is not the issue at stake here.
Racism and other things including poverty, health care, and other things to EMPOWER the peoples of the US.
And to the whole bit that the emancipation proclamation was to free and give citizenship to all slaves... that is only partially true (if not hardly)..
Lincoln did not believe in freement of slaves because it would tear our country apart. The EP was only to help in promoting the end of the slavery movement and bring both sides of the country together to eventually end slavery... slowly. All sides were in relation to slavery, and there were equal amounts of dems and republicans for both abolition and for the keeping of slavery in the country at that time.
But those are non sensical issues to be bringing up in a debate that has been needed since the anti-slavery movement.
With the sense that this IS the 21st century.. those are the issues of the past.. we need to worry about our future.. that is what is at stake here. The democratic party is bringing up key issues that need to be stated and that are to be deliberated in a timely and consistant manner.
The Democrats grasp more firmly on the idea of the government FOR the PEOPLE.. as it has been stated before that is what it is SUPPOSED TO BE!! None of the big business and money hogs are to be apart of the decisions we make that are for the people.. which right now are the poor and underprivileged that are driven to that state by the MONEY Scoundrels that started it all.
democrats believe in higher taxes, thats goverment interference so how can u say a democratic goverment is more for the people where as republicans r more 4 letting people make their own choices financialy.
But they really don't want to include people in the decision making process. Unlike Obama most republicans don't want to show the nitty-gritty of the government
and anyways..
to use the higher taxes for universal health care.. COME ON, you have to get the money some where!
Why wouldn't you want to, for the sake of the whole, give part of your taxes so we can all have good health care?
In other countries.. most people don't blink when it comes to the higher taxes for the whole.. (well there is some concern and discontentment)but you have to give up one freedom for another!
do u have any idea how much they would have 2 raise taxes 2 provide universal health care 2 300 million people. people wouldn't be able 2 send thier kids 2 collage for 1 thing. look at canadas health care, the actual treatment is good but it takes 6 months to a year just 2 get a doctors appointment. canadians with terminal illnes come 2 the US because they can't get the health care they need in canada. 4 some its to late cause they don't get treated in time. universal healthcare will never work.
We need a government that will create opportunities not create more hassles that the American people can not face and that the world needs to improve on also.
After those RFK comments from hillary, does anyone actually think that this would be a dream ticket? I think this would be a death ticket because hillary would have him killed.
shaenu77 3 years ago
You can always dig up dirt on any and every candidate. But go & try to find something negative about RON PAUL. You can't. Now ask yourself why there is only 1 GOP on the ballot. You can't vote for Ron Paul because he is against corrupt gov't. And this gov't is ot going to let him dominate the polls AND the election. If you believe anyhting that comes out of any of the candidates mouths, yoo're a sucka! "Read my lips NO NEW TAXES!"-"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"-W.M.D.'s? C'mon
connoisseurodg 3 years ago
wow, it's gonna be a really exciting year
urbanfleur 4 years ago
I have to say I'm suprised. I thought Obama would dominate Clinton but she did end up pulling a couple of good arguments out. I like Obama's policy on immigration while Clinton gave a pretty good troop withdrawal statement. I will have a hard time at the caususes today.
GeneralDrizzle 4 years ago
clinton-obama 2008!
palatulog 4 years ago
obama-clinton 2008!
rwoods77 4 years ago
Clinton/Obama 08!
Manfi123 4 years ago
I believe when it came to logic and policies Obama won the debate but when it came to bitchiness and argument Hilary won this debate. Obama 08.
harmwon 4 years ago
a horable idea i don't want her face to be at the cash register at burger king
but if she was vice priz then they would just be bring the same old dirty money hogs back in instead he should say no and cut them out of the picture then no more dumb ass's in the white house
joesephburns 4 years ago 3
Any ticket with Clinton will do as much to motivate the republican base, as Obama has added to the democratic base.
sj829 4 years ago
Obama say nooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!
ekvuswer 4 years ago
Obama, run away, run away!
sj829 4 years ago
I LOVE the idea of either Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton. Here'e hoping that it works out that way!!
ANewDay2007 4 years ago 2
Democrats all the way, We the "D"s are nice, humble, generous, helpful and we want a change. I want a democrat to be in office on Jan 1/08 and I cannot stand a "R"at be in a chair just watching world news and veto good future amendments, I am had it with these fucking racist, rat, republicans. No matter who wins the "D" premilinaries, I go 4 the Democrats - Yes WE CAN ! Enough is Enough ... Time 4 a change - fuck the reps, Let's Go Democrats ... Go Blue State !
Obamam & Clinton 08 -
oskey22 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
YOUR IGNORANCE MUST BE BLISS
frockey99 4 years ago
ya ignorance lol. ive been watching the republican debates as well.
hastingsgames 4 years ago
its clear from the republican debates that the old saying "choosing a lesser of two evils" comes from the republicans. its not until they join in that candidates have to resort to defending their character against mudslinging and (in the case of both of GWB's debates, flat out lies about what they say they can accomplish and what he actually can). clearly, the democrats have a greater respect for their opponents and it is DESERVED.
hastingsgames 4 years ago
oskey22, its ignorant 4 u 2 say that republicans r racist when it was democrats who wanted to continue slavery and it was democrat senators who joined the kkk. where as it was the republicans who ended slavery and a republican president who signed the emancipation proclamatoin, united the country, and freed and gave citizenship to all slaves.
u22uSRV 4 years ago
u22, You mad b/c I am saying the truth !
oskey22 4 years ago
u can believe whatever bullshit u want oskey22, but what i said is a fact, but most liberals r uninformed and don't know their history so its nothing new. btw, i'm not mad.
u22uSRV 4 years ago
You are getting red, Look I think he is blushing - LOL
oskey22 4 years ago
Well i am sorry to state that this is not the classical government that you want to praise here.. but the modern government. Slavery is not the issue at stake here.
Racism and other things including poverty, health care, and other things to EMPOWER the peoples of the US.
And to the whole bit that the emancipation proclamation was to free and give citizenship to all slaves... that is only partially true (if not hardly)..
hpfan411 4 years ago
Lincoln did not believe in freement of slaves because it would tear our country apart. The EP was only to help in promoting the end of the slavery movement and bring both sides of the country together to eventually end slavery... slowly. All sides were in relation to slavery, and there were equal amounts of dems and republicans for both abolition and for the keeping of slavery in the country at that time.
hpfan411 4 years ago
But those are non sensical issues to be bringing up in a debate that has been needed since the anti-slavery movement.
With the sense that this IS the 21st century.. those are the issues of the past.. we need to worry about our future.. that is what is at stake here. The democratic party is bringing up key issues that need to be stated and that are to be deliberated in a timely and consistant manner.
hpfan411 4 years ago
The Democrats grasp more firmly on the idea of the government FOR the PEOPLE.. as it has been stated before that is what it is SUPPOSED TO BE!! None of the big business and money hogs are to be apart of the decisions we make that are for the people.. which right now are the poor and underprivileged that are driven to that state by the MONEY Scoundrels that started it all.
hpfan411 4 years ago
democrats believe in higher taxes, thats goverment interference so how can u say a democratic goverment is more for the people where as republicans r more 4 letting people make their own choices financialy.
u22uSRV 4 years ago
But they really don't want to include people in the decision making process. Unlike Obama most republicans don't want to show the nitty-gritty of the government
and anyways..
to use the higher taxes for universal health care.. COME ON, you have to get the money some where!
Why wouldn't you want to, for the sake of the whole, give part of your taxes so we can all have good health care?
hpfan411 4 years ago
In other countries.. most people don't blink when it comes to the higher taxes for the whole.. (well there is some concern and discontentment)but you have to give up one freedom for another!
hpfan411 4 years ago
do u have any idea how much they would have 2 raise taxes 2 provide universal health care 2 300 million people. people wouldn't be able 2 send thier kids 2 collage for 1 thing. look at canadas health care, the actual treatment is good but it takes 6 months to a year just 2 get a doctors appointment. canadians with terminal illnes come 2 the US because they can't get the health care they need in canada. 4 some its to late cause they don't get treated in time. universal healthcare will never work.
u22uSRV 4 years ago
We need a government that will create opportunities not create more hassles that the American people can not face and that the world needs to improve on also.
hpfan411 4 years ago
When a running mate is chosen, how do the two candidates treat their previous disagreements?
humder 4 years ago
respectfully
estoodious 4 years ago