why have a hypothetical argument about a 30 round clip when you can get 50 round banana clips, what if Jared did not shoot anybody no matter how many bullets were in his clip.
O'Donnell is so big of a blowhard, he has no points in his argument so he just raises his voice as if what he says has any value.Kick all Socialist's & communists out of the country.
@jahs1stson Haha! Captain Hindsight is from South Park, it's a parody of the oil gulf crisis and how people were saying what we should have done while there was still oil gushing out. I think it was mostly a reference to James Cameron. The argument O'Donnell is making is so familiar that I called him Captain Hindsight.
O'Donnell is educated but he is a douchebag, anti-gun socialist (yes, he said he's a socialist).
Porkistani. Is O'Donnel Nazi... OR... Communist??? There is a difference you know! Nazi is from your end of the Political spectrum. By the sound of it, perhaps to your left... oh I get it, anyone on the left of YOUR politics can be grouped together and thus... Nazi and Communist can actually be clumped together. Did I mention... Idiot?
My end of the political spectrum is conservative and Capitalist. Nazi's were/are Socialists. They claim they are the purest Socialists but communists and other forms would argue they are. Nazi's are Stateists. Like the Communists Shitler's first act in office was to confiscate everyone's guns. They used abortion quite widely. The government had abolute control over all business, industry, print media, ect...
For someone to be regarded as retarded in America that person needs to have an IQ lower than 70. However my IQ is 136. So I do not quilify as a "true retard." You on the other hand...
@PorkistaniCockSucker Um.. what were the major forms of production that the Nazi government actually OWNED. I'm curious. Oh yeah the Nazi government didn't actually own any means of production but PAID private corporations like Mercedes for their war materials. It is true that the government DICTATED what was to be produced but that is not socialism but FASCISM.
@dtitus1304 Do you know that Christianity is correct? The world around us reveals that G-d DOES exist, and the historical evidence reveals that Jesus Christ really did come to this earth and there is overwhelming evidence that Jesus Christ really did physically rise from the dead. Jesus is coming again and the signs of the end times that were foretold in the Bible are coming to pass.
O'donnell is just another angry communist/Nazi who wants to strip Americans of their right to bear arms. Hitler and the communists were effective in brutalizing and controlling their people by taking away their guns.
One of many reasons why O'Donell has such brutally low ratings.
O'Donnell is a fool. The guy is trying to kill people... by the way that's against the law... so if he was willing to break that law do you think he would have then followed the law that said he could only have a clip with ten rounds in it. That's the idiocy of liberal logic... They think Killers will follow and obey gun laws when they go out to kill or rob people... INSANITY, thy name is liberal.
This is "TOTAL" Zionist Media instigated "Intimidation and Humiliation Tactics" in how Their Mass Media "SHOUTS-DOWN ANYONE" who has a Voice and an Opinion which is not in line with Theirs!! Turn Your Zionist "New World [ENSLAVING] Order" TV'S OFF! As you will Never get the Truth nor Facts from it! TV has given these Hidden from Public scrutiny Parasites Their Psychopathic Power as Their major "ENEMY" is the "TRUTH!" and Their Major Weapon on Non-Public Detection, is "Anti-Semitism!" "Wake-UP!"
all the right wingers who think loughner was a liberal need to see a doctor. loughner thought that government was taking over people's lives and subverting the constitution. sound liberal to u?
I'm not convinced Loughner was a "liberal," exactly, either. But liberals, like conservatives, can also base their positions on a fear of intrusive government. They just typically do so on a different set of issues (e.g. gay rights, drug legalization, censorship).
I love how libs claim to be pro-arms, then flip flop after a shooting (to get votes for hussein). The gun is always at fault, but then they ship thousands of free guns to Mexico that are used to kill Americans. What planet is this!!!!!!
Liberals are living in Candy Land if they think criminals and people who want to shoot a crowd of people, like Loughner, Won't get their hands on a 30 round magazine if we just make it so people cant legally purchase them.
Lets pretend Jared was not a total liberal and was not as crazy as all other liberals.?. It was great when the truth came out that Jared was a liberal like Lawrence.
@MrWarensamble you're retarded. loughner believed that the government was taking over people's lives and subverting the constitution. sound liberal to u?
Funny, he wasn't a right wing, working class, hateful fool. He voted for Obama. Just be honest. He was and is a maniac. Don't try to make this about class or party, he is a killer. To all my left wing friends, maybe you should remember the "Call to Civility" that our President made.
@kluetkemeye that "call for civility" was aimed at US, not his side. they are still expected to call us every nasty thing they can think of, and accuse us of the most outlandish acts even if they aren't actually possible
Hey Lawrence, Harvard graduate, Senator Moynihan’s aide, on Bill Clinton’s staff, and high level meetings in the Oval Office! Daddy worked hard to pay for your college, all those talks around the dinner table about going far, you must really be a disappointment to him, because no matter how hard you try, you will never be President! You will never even be considered for President! Ron Paul has a better chance! How does it feel to have your whole career boil down to being a liberal puppet?
That congressman is a good man. If I was him I would have reach over and bitch slapped that talking head and said shout your mouth when I am trying to talk.
I've only just now truly familiarized myself with O'Donnell as an interviewer. It seems all he does is shout people down without giving them a chance to complete a single thought. He's even worse than O'Reilly in that regard.
Pal, practically all he does is interrupt his guests and talk over them. That's got nothing to do with being left-wing or right-wing, or somewhere in between. You can stand against "right-wing BS and illogical gibberish" without conducting yourself like a loudmouth in a bar.
And his argument here was idiotic anyway. He blames the individual for the first ten bullets, but the law for the rest of them? Stupid.
@DetCrockett7 Well, from what I heard, in 2003, you weren't allowed to buy magazines (or "clips") that contained more than 10 bullets, and in 2004, Arizona lifted this limit to magazines of 31 bullets. What the guy is trying to say is "why did the politicians NEED to increase the amount of bullets?"
I also kind of agree with the other guy. You can't blame guns in general, you blame the user. Not everyone with a gun commits murders, and not every murder is done with a gun...
@SsJVasto I know that. My point is that O'Donnell's argument is ridiculous. If the law hadn't been changed, and Loughner had only been able to pack 10 rounds per magazine, he simply could have packed a couple more guns, and still gotten off the 30 rounds. Hence, the change in the law didn't really affect a thing.
@DetCrockett7 no. he only had 1 gun. he didn't bring 2 or 3. he brought 1! if the ban hadn't expired, more people would be alive. he wasn't expecting to be taken down while changing clips. what is wrong with you?
Of course he only had one gun. MY POINT, Einstein, is that under the old law, Loughner could have just packed a couple more guns TO MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE IN THE NUMBER OF ROUNDS. There was a limit to the number of rounds per magazine, not to the number of guns carried. Not to mention, he simply could have obtained a gun with over ten rounds illegally anyway.
@DetCrockett7 read my 1st message again. why are you inventing scenarios? chances are he only had ONE gun, so no matter what, that's all he would have brought. the point is that he wasn't expecting ANY problems reloading. so he would have had lots of clips with only 10 rounds apiece
@alexwilliams2962 It's still a ludicrous argument. And it's not that I'm "inventing" scenarios; rather, I'm being logical as to what likely would have happened instead.
The problem with your--and O'Donnell's--argument is that you're assuming Loughner would have obeyed the law as far as the ban was concerned. We're talking about a murderer here. If he's going to kill people, do you honestly think he'll think twice about breaking a gun law?
@DetCrockett7 and lets pretend for a minute that he did bring 2 guns. with the ban in place, that would have meant 20 bullets before having to reload instead of 31. either way, the ban would have saved lives and they would have tackled him sooner.
@alexwilliams2962 "Lets pretend for a minute that he did bring 2 guns" . . . "that would have meant 20 bullets before having to reload instead of 31 . . ."
You don't read too well, do you? I said two MORE guns, meaning THREE in all, the point being, genius, that he would still have thirty bullets to fire in all.
And again, he still could have simply obtained an illegal assault weapon with at least a 30-round capacity anyway.
@DetCrockett7 so he would need 3 guns before your ridiculous possibility makes sense. u still haven't addressed the fact that he didn't think reloading would be a problem. wouldn't it be more logical to assume that he would have just brought a bunch of clips instead of a bunch of guns? come on man. u know your argument is absurd. the ban would have saved lives. THERE'S NO REASON FOR A CLIP TO HOLD 30 BULLETS!!!!!
@alexwilliams2962 You really need to work on your logical reasoning skills, pal.
The whole reloading issue, that you and O'Donnell are fixated upon, is actually moot if you think about it. I'm going to sound redundant here, but I'm repeating this because I just don't think you're getting it: Ban or no ban, Loughner STILL could have obtained the same weapon, via illegal means (the black market). It amazes me that you and O'Donnell don't grasp that.
Also, if Loughner carried the three guns with 10 clips each, reloading still wouldn't be an issue. It takes far less time to simply switch to another gun and begin firing, than it does to reload the same weapon. Again, this is just common sense, and the fact that you and O'Donnell are overlooking this obvious possibility is nothing short of astounding.
To answer your actual question: It's POSSIBLE Loughner would have just brought more clips, sure. But it's far from definite. Again, though, he may have prepared for the incident differently, or he may have still gotten the same weapon, just illegally.
And yes, there is a reason for a clip to hold 30 bullets, or more--an obvious one: When you're dealing with OPPOSITION with that kind of capability.
@DetCrockett7 1. if the ban was in place, i SERIOUSLY DOUBT he would have been able to get a 30 bullet clip on his own. that would be onerous enough for anyone, but we're talking about a person so demented it's hard to imagine him even being able dress himself in the morning
Sure he could have, are you joking? All you have to do is know the right people--and it's not that hard. And you're exaggerating the extent of Loughner's problems. Despite his obvious psychological shortcomings, he was functionally fully competent.
@DetCrockett7 2. u came close to admitting this but couldn't quite get there: it's much more LOGICAL to assume that he would have brought more clips instead of more guns. i believe he only owned 1 gun, and he wasn't rich. clips are relatively inexpensive. my point all along was that the multiple gun hypothetical is just dumb. if there'd been a ban in place, we have every reason to think that he would've made up for it by buying MORE CLIPS - NOT GUNS
No, it is not more logical. Just because he only owned one gun for this incident, under the given circumstances, doesn't mean he would not have obtained more--or none at all, even--had the circumstances been different. ANY change in circumstance could have altered the outcome here dramatically. It's not limited to Loughner's access to weapons, or the laws governing those weapons.
@DetCrockett7 3. it goes without saying that he COULD have brought more guns or done something else that neither u nor i have thought of. that's just reality. the question still is whether it should be this easy to buy 30 clip rounds. if u think u really need that many bullets for self-defense then there's something VERY WRONG with your lifestyle. monsters like loughner should not be able to buy this stuff at Sam's club. don't see how any objective person could disagree
Well, no, that wasn't the question, actually. But to address it, sure, it shouldn't be "easy" to buy any number of rounds, let alone 30 or more.
As to the self-defense question, you're wrong, because you simply don't know if you'll need that many rounds or not. In a typical situation involving guns, you wouldn't even need a standard six. But situations aren't always typical.
So, Lawrence O'Donnell wants to assume that the shooter is a law abiding citizen who only purchases legally obtained magazines? Making 10+ round magazines illegal takes those magazines out of the hands of law abiding citizens, not killers.
Surprised people go after O'Reilly all the time, yet Lawrence O'Donnell and the other MSNBC loons always seem to gets a pass when they act the same way.
Stupid republicans.... I bet if they read another book other than the Bible, they might just learn something. But then they would have to deal with actually knowing what they're talking about.....
dont get silly? as if to say this guy while planning his murder would not use a 30 round clip because it would be illegal? lmao no wonder msnbc has zero credibilty! is this o'donnel related to rosie or somthing?
I'd sure want a bigger magazine if thugs were crashing in my front door! In a free country, even lunatics can get a gun, but if we lose our gun rights only the thieves and thugs will have them.
@ontario1727 I have never seen anything like this.To be honest I despise Olberman.I thought he was the very Idea of what leftist media outlets do.They refuse to let the opposition or guest answer the questions they are asked.Compared to this lawerence odonell asshole Olberman is one of the farest most mild mannered,well thoughout well spoken liberal interviewers I have ever seen.This proves how non violent conservatives are.Im the exception.I would beat the fuck out of this rude cocksucker.
PATHETIC GUN-nut REPUBLICANS can't give up their LOVE OF DEATH. To even suggest that that ridiculous 31-bullet clip should not be allowed, would stop the THRILL these gun-NUTS get up their pants when they UNLOAD on a child or a innocent. They are SHAMELESS, ANTI-AMERICAN CLOWNS. Pathetic GUN-nuts are INCAPABLE of reason, when it comes to protecting our citizens. Just vote them out. Now. Congressman nut-job says... KEEP THE MURDER-clips. LET MURDERERS KEEP THEIR MURDER WEAPONS. Pathetic!
@medartist01 weak minded liberals..do anything to get a vote..even if it means selling your morals down the road..who the fuck is going to protect you against disgruntled Opinionated Shock jock self proclaimed millionaire " media reporters "
@medartist01 You are a complete idiot.IT is the americans right to bare arms by our FOUNDING FATHERS.The SUPREME COURT HAS SEEN IT OUR WAY.You make me want to vomit with your unload on a child comment.You are whats wrong with the world.Thank god most lefist arent like you.While idiots like you scream about criminals rights while trying to take away the rights of LAW ABIDING CITIZENS we need the right to bare arms to protect our families from the violent criminal you assholes care so much about.
@medartist01 Why dont you look up how many time a year a gun protects a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN & thier family from violents criminals?The statistics make anti gun nut look foolish.Everything including the constitution of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS ON OUR SIDE.Yet you anti gun nuts are so arrogant you keep running your mouths.But thats why you have freesom of speech also our rights because of the constitution.You are incapable of reason that is seen by your gunning down children comment.
Please watch my story "TIFFANY LEBOUEF SEEKS JUSTICE" They hid my only evidence and lied about it then they made me "TAKE THE DEAL" or go to Prison for 9 + yrs. This is crazy stuff. They have given me 2 strikes and one more brush with the law of any kind will send me to "PRISON FOR LIFE"..... HELP MEEEEEEEE!
I have documents to PROVE my innocence but no one will even look at it. What is going on with this country???
This guy is attacking the wrong person. Attack the guy that shot the people. People cannot continue to blame government when its convenient. This is the problem with society, not everyone sees things the same way, its been this way since civilization. Some laws will pass and some wont, what society needs to do is get up and vote and be vocal that way, sitting at home complaining about the laws and the officials appointed are not going to help the world. Get your butts up and VOTE.
you get old enough and you come to the realization that a larger sect of society than you want to admit is simply unable to fully grasp complex issues. it certainly doesnt help when demented windbags like odonnel are allowed to be on the air. and i do mean allowed to be on the air, he certainly isnt there for his ratings.
@K131399 Keep your GOP propaganda non sense to yourself. Nobody is saying the government needs to control your life, but keeping say cooperate america honest and in check is needed. Turn off FOX News and get a clue.
Guns don't think. People kill people, it's not the guns fault. Obama is responsible by appointing idiots who think it's clever to let guns walk, just because they believe they cannot control and dominate the American people wile the people have freedom and the constitutional right have a gun.
good point by pravda comrade Odonnell ..even obama didnt smuggle 30 round magazines to the narco terrorists in mexico and thus ,so far only two US border agents and perhaps 200 mexican civillians have been murdered with these gifts from obama;s DOJ to the cartel thuggistas..
these stupid liberals have NO understanding of the purpose behind the 2nd amendment.....it wasn't soley to protect people from each other, but from the government. They don't even know they're helping the elites in making us vulnerable......
@somuch4freedom they know exactly what they're doing, and things wont change unless these freaks start getting called out on their actual motives. just have a good laugh at the fact that this moron has absolutely no viewers.
So odoneel thinks it ok to have a gun as long as it has ten bullets? What planet is this idiot from? How bout no gun dumb ass, then no one would have been shot n killed!!!!! Time to EPC Odoneel!!! Lock em up!!!!
@bizzleblue38 Actually, Odonnell has more than once said on TV that if he was president, all guns would be banned, so before you call him an idiot why don't you actually look up his beliefs...idiot...have a nice day.
@TerryComo2010 lol well he has i'm not gonna look up every episode i think he's the man i watch him every night but ur just too stupid to talk to please dont respond to this bye
@joelmcentire1 It was reported that FOX (faux) NEWS viewers have less knowledge about facts and actual news than any other group of viewers on television. Sorry to let you down like that. But all one has to do is look at this BS on the Iowa Caucuses. Get real! Neither Ron Paul, Santorum, Bachmann, nor Gingrich has any chance of ever becoming president. The religious right will never win in a general election, and that is what the GOP has become. Good luck, you will need it Nov.
@TerryComo2010 well your statement about fox news fans being fact deficient isn't a quantifiable stat so you really don't have anything to back it up. but i have a stat. way more people watch fox news than msnbc with those lunatic hosts, o donnell , chris mathews and that fourteen year old boy rachael maddow. oh i got another stat for you. we are 16 trillion dollars in debt. because of obama. good luck to you in Nov your going to need it
@joelmcentire1 Was on National news so it is "quantifiable" and a FACT. And as far as FOX news goes, O'Reilly's ratings are higher, I'll admit. But they are only 1.8 million out of 350 million!
So that is only a miniscule number over MSNBC! Idiot! Keep drinking the GOP Koolaid!
@TerryComo2010 350 million huh? i guess you count illegal aliens in there. there are not quite that many american citizens. what your numbers show is that nobody watches the news in this country, but in comparison msnbc has nobody even close to O'reilly. not even close. you liberals are all on youtube giving thumbs up to all the libs and thumbs down to all the conservatives. i must be one of five conservatives that is online. we conservatives work. you guys occupy seseme street
@joelmcentire1 Typical idiot Republican that changes the subject! The number of people in the country has nothing to do with illegal aliens. Whether illegal or legal, they watch television and there are at least 350 million. So O'Reilly has 1.85 million as watchers in his latest Neilsen's. That is miniscule! So keep fooling yourself for all I care and watch FAUX NEWS if you want. Your lack of knowledge and stupidity proved my point.
@TerryComo2010 why don't you spit the number of people that watch the Ed show on msnbc. he shares the same block. perhaps that would give us a new definition of the word miniscule. you are comparing 1.85 million to all humans in america to make your point sound cooler than it really is. why stop there? how many people are in the world? bill's numbers just got smaller. you are quite good at name calling too. a usual liberal trait.
@joelmcentire1 Switched between O'Reilly and the Ed Show as I always do. O'Reilly hocking his book again and doing a story on horse races, and street interviews, REAL NEWS! LOL. His show is a joke and you continue to prove it, as you can take the truth about as well as Newt Gingrich! Get ready for an Obama landslide!
@TerryComo2010 i admit that obama may win. but by no landslide. enough talking points, just admit the fact that no president has been re-elected with such a low approval rating. I think the only way he can win is if the GOP just does something terribly off key. this time baby's mamas won't get off the couch to keep the first black president in. He didn't change one thing about washington politics. hope and change. uh huh sure. i cant believe you swallowed that pill.
@joelmcentire1 I have no illusions and swallowed no pill. The fact is the Republican Party has been co-opted by the religious right and the Tea Party maniacs and has lost all credibility. Not one of the would be nominees running have any intention of changing America, except maybe Ron Paul, and even he is too extreme even for the GOP. The American voter wants a middle of the road president. And they have one in the White House right now. As the economy improves Obama will win.
@TerryComo2010 obama won't win.He is nowhere near the middle of the road save on foreign policy. i'll give him that. but fiscally he is the most left since FDR and americans don't like it. admit he could not have won if he was not our first black president. 95% black vote. yeah I'll bet those innercity kids with sagging pants really know the facts. Mitt Romney is as middle of the road as they come. that is a fact
@joelmcentire1 I give up. You are delusional. On O'Reilly tonight the poll on Gay's serving in the military was 66% yes, 22% no. That is in agreement with Obama and is middle of the road. That was on FOX!! So you can think Romney is middle of the road, with his religious stupidity, and Santorum's blatant racist comment today of "Blacks" (check it out on youtube) and Gingrich's elitism. Go ahead and think any one of them has a chance. You will be sorely dissapointed this Nov.
@TerryComo2010 you seem to not like religious people. but if obama happens to lose by some freak off chance election, will you be disappointed? Or will you move to europe where they live the life you seem to want? you seem to think you could not stand to have a religious president. Is it true?
@joelmcentire1 Most of the GOP candidates pretend to be religious and some probably are. However I do not want a president that talks to God. We had one named GW. One of the worst of all time. Religion, as I have said before is the scourge of the civilized world. It has caused more wars, hatred and bigotry in the name of God than anything. All religions want to convert others, as theirs is the only "true religion" Bunk! God does not take sides...Tebow has not figured that out yet!
@TerryComo2010 i think tebow does exactly what he has a God given right to do. he doesn't seem to be a bad guy at all. I don't think GW was very bad either. see you can't judge GW as the worst when you don't even know the voting record of James Garfield. now before you google it, don't worry, garfield wasn't that bad. its just you can't even name all the presidents so it is hard to determine. would you move to europe if romney won to escape all the blood and terror you speak of?
@TerryComo2010 I agreed until your stupid Tebow coment.This kid has done nothing at all but pray on the field like thousands of players before him but is scorned because he made an anti abortion commercial with his mom.Man has used religion to do horrible things but they have used communism also.I would rather have faith in a loving god than a communist dictator,because after all they have caused the deaths of millions & millions of innocent people throughout the history of man too
@jays2474 Yes you are right, I suppose I should not blame Tebow for organized religion. But the hatred and bigotry of each religion pitted against the other is the scourge of man.
@TerryComo2010 terry the point is not to not let gays serve, the point is to keep it to yourself. You seem to have a misinterpretation of what these candidates are trying to say. Wouldnt it be fair to ask the heterosexual soldiers if they feel comfortable knowing that one of their fellows servicemen is gay?. Everyone wants rights passed for THEMSELVES instead of looking how a law can benefit EVERYONE. Open your eyes buddy and stop blinding yourself with your self absorbed mentality.
Franks=usual political ideological lie on top of lie and everything is always everyone else's fault. And when you get caught being stupid--get more stupid.
Damn... This GOPer is a seriously disingenuous intellectually dishonest little whore for the gun lobby. I wonder how much they contribute to his campaign?
Before the Iraq war, Iraq's citizens were just as heavily armed as U.S. citizens, yet they were not a free society. It takes more that just gun ownership to make a nation free. I'm not for gun control, just sayin'....
If someone with a CCW was allowed to be there, it probably would've been over a LOT sooner. Someone should have put a bullet in Loughner's head 5 seconds after he pulled that gun out.
@kdbrown777 There was such a man there; he did nothing. Why? Because it takes 4 minutes to learn how to load and shoot a pistol but hundreds of hours of training to recognize when to use it, against whom to use it, and once unholstered to use it in such a situation with extreme accuracy and with intent to kill the target and ONLY that target. Obviously, this is too far beyond the capacity of the typical CCW adolescent-thinking blowhard..
good job Lawrence. you should give him another cleft palate.
kkrr00nnicc420 2 hours ago
Comment removed
kkrr00nnicc420 2 hours ago
Lawrence #1
Kuhnfuze 1 day ago
why have a hypothetical argument about a 30 round clip when you can get 50 round banana clips, what if Jared did not shoot anybody no matter how many bullets were in his clip.
O'Donnell is so big of a blowhard, he has no points in his argument so he just raises his voice as if what he says has any value.Kick all Socialist's & communists out of the country.
Starting with this Fool.Go back to Cambridge
jahs1stson 2 days ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is Captain Hindsight.
coyotefever105 5 days ago 2
@coyotefever105 He is a fool from Harvard with no education and it is apparent.
Captain Hindsight who is that the first Gay superhero
jahs1stson 2 days ago
@jahs1stson Haha! Captain Hindsight is from South Park, it's a parody of the oil gulf crisis and how people were saying what we should have done while there was still oil gushing out. I think it was mostly a reference to James Cameron. The argument O'Donnell is making is so familiar that I called him Captain Hindsight.
O'Donnell is educated but he is a douchebag, anti-gun socialist (yes, he said he's a socialist).
coyotefever105 2 days ago
Isnt the dailycaller a wannabe media matters for republicans? Thats why theyre doing all the he said she said against them???
himaytattz 5 days ago
@himaytattz No, they're the conservative opposite of the Huffington Post
coyotefever105 2 days ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is an idiot.
lesterwink23 5 days ago
Porkistani. Is O'Donnel Nazi... OR... Communist??? There is a difference you know! Nazi is from your end of the Political spectrum. By the sound of it, perhaps to your left... oh I get it, anyone on the left of YOUR politics can be grouped together and thus... Nazi and Communist can actually be clumped together. Did I mention... Idiot?
Pamphlets1 6 days ago
@Pamphlets1
My end of the political spectrum is conservative and Capitalist. Nazi's were/are Socialists. They claim they are the purest Socialists but communists and other forms would argue they are. Nazi's are Stateists. Like the Communists Shitler's first act in office was to confiscate everyone's guns. They used abortion quite widely. The government had abolute control over all business, industry, print media, ect...
You are the "idiot/moron".
Now go suck some dick.
PorkistaniCockSucker 3 days ago
@PorkistaniCockSucker "Nazi's were/are Socialists."
Um.. The Nazis were not that kind of socialists. "National Socialism" refered to SOCIAL policy not Economic policy. Get an education for fuck sake.
mjh012363 2 days ago
@mjh012363 You're a true retard
NobleMaN79 2 days ago
@NobleMaN79 "You're a true retard"
For someone to be regarded as retarded in America that person needs to have an IQ lower than 70. However my IQ is 136. So I do not quilify as a "true retard." You on the other hand...
mjh012363 2 days ago
@mjh012363
Looks like you're the one that needs to learn. It certainly refers also to Economic policy.
The truth is that you Libtards are in the sames group with the Nazi's and that hurts. Get an education for fuck sake.
PorkistaniCockSucker 2 days ago
Comment removed
mjh012363 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PorkistaniCockSucker Um.. what were the major forms of production that the Nazi government actually OWNED. I'm curious. Oh yeah the Nazi government didn't actually own any means of production but PAID private corporations like Mercedes for their war materials. It is true that the government DICTATED what was to be produced but that is not socialism but FASCISM.
mjh012363 2 days ago
Comment removed
jahs1stson 2 days ago
Porkistani . From someone in Australia... you are a first class idiot... dare I say... moron(I like to keep these things civil).
Pamphlets1 6 days ago
gave him a simple question, and like most idoit republican he takes it way to far... Understand the question and answer it.
DB25islive 1 week ago
@DB25islive Don't be a fucking moron.
dtitus1304 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dtitus1304 Do you know that Christianity is correct? The world around us reveals that G-d DOES exist, and the historical evidence reveals that Jesus Christ really did come to this earth and there is overwhelming evidence that Jesus Christ really did physically rise from the dead. Jesus is coming again and the signs of the end times that were foretold in the Bible are coming to pass.
marionetemanJ 3 days ago
O'donnell is just another angry communist/Nazi who wants to strip Americans of their right to bear arms. Hitler and the communists were effective in brutalizing and controlling their people by taking away their guns.
One of many reasons why O'Donell has such brutally low ratings.
PorkistaniCockSucker 1 week ago
@PorkistaniCockSucker Communist/Nazi? Don't you know that they are the complete opposite?
tcaron72 3 days ago
@tcaron72
Communist & Nazi are both variations of Socialism. There are many variations. They are NOT in any way opposite but quite similar.
PorkistaniCockSucker 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PorkistaniCockSucker "Communist & Nazi are both variations of Socialism"
Um.. The Nazis were not that kind of socialists. "National Socialism" refered to SOCIAL policy not Economic policy. Get an education for fuck sake.
mjh012363 2 days ago
O'Donnell is a fool. The guy is trying to kill people... by the way that's against the law... so if he was willing to break that law do you think he would have then followed the law that said he could only have a clip with ten rounds in it. That's the idiocy of liberal logic... They think Killers will follow and obey gun laws when they go out to kill or rob people... INSANITY, thy name is liberal.
s
Dogwarrior 1 week ago
this guy needs to be taken off the air . hey asshole drugs are illegal do you want to buy some pot grow the fuck up
middleoftheroad24 1 week ago
Larry look at yourself == you sir are an abortionist.
ussoldiersm316 1 week ago
This is "TOTAL" Zionist Media instigated "Intimidation and Humiliation Tactics" in how Their Mass Media "SHOUTS-DOWN ANYONE" who has a Voice and an Opinion which is not in line with Theirs!! Turn Your Zionist "New World [ENSLAVING] Order" TV'S OFF! As you will Never get the Truth nor Facts from it! TV has given these Hidden from Public scrutiny Parasites Their Psychopathic Power as Their major "ENEMY" is the "TRUTH!" and Their Major Weapon on Non-Public Detection, is "Anti-Semitism!" "Wake-UP!"
einrib4truth 1 week ago
only fagits and sailors are named lawrence...wonder which one this douche is
SocialAssasin 1 week ago
@SocialAssasin You spelled it wrong.
mjmanning123 1 week ago
all the right wingers who think loughner was a liberal need to see a doctor. loughner thought that government was taking over people's lives and subverting the constitution. sound liberal to u?
alexwilliams2962 1 week ago
@alexwilliams2962 You're being simpleminded here.
I'm not convinced Loughner was a "liberal," exactly, either. But liberals, like conservatives, can also base their positions on a fear of intrusive government. They just typically do so on a different set of issues (e.g. gay rights, drug legalization, censorship).
DetCrockett7 1 week ago
just as idiotic as his west wing character
fdantheman 1 week ago
Just another Liberal idiot!
nextdrink45 1 week ago
Typical liberal douche bag
TreeSmoke1999 1 week ago
Can't wait to see Lawrence O'Donnell skewer hussein over Fast & Furious scandal. We're waiting. Anytime now.
spankula123 1 week ago
@spankula123 I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you! lol
jrooksable 1 week ago
I love how libs claim to be pro-arms, then flip flop after a shooting (to get votes for hussein). The gun is always at fault, but then they ship thousands of free guns to Mexico that are used to kill Americans. What planet is this!!!!!!
spankula123 1 week ago
Liberals are living in Candy Land if they think criminals and people who want to shoot a crowd of people, like Loughner, Won't get their hands on a 30 round magazine if we just make it so people cant legally purchase them.
epiclulz66 2 weeks ago 2
Lets pretend Jared was not a total liberal and was not as crazy as all other liberals.?. It was great when the truth came out that Jared was a liberal like Lawrence.
MrWarensamble 2 weeks ago
@MrWarensamble you're retarded. loughner believed that the government was taking over people's lives and subverting the constitution. sound liberal to u?
alexwilliams2962 2 weeks ago
@alexwilliams2962 Jarrod Loughner was A looney as a lark, and B liberal as "The One"
jrooksable 1 week ago
@jrooksable you're retarded. loughner believed the government was taking over people's lives and subverting the constitution. get help, friend
alexwilliams2962 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The mentally challenged liberals are just mad because some kid shot a liberal congress women and a couple of marxist liberal scum Federal judges.
EthnicCleanser01 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lawrence O'Donnell is wrong here.
NPCExplorers 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lawrence O'Donnell is wrong here. Simple.
NPCExplorers 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lawrence O'Donnell is wrong here. Simple.
NPCExplorers 2 weeks ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is wrong here. Simple.
NPCExplorers 2 weeks ago
Funny, he wasn't a right wing, working class, hateful fool. He voted for Obama. Just be honest. He was and is a maniac. Don't try to make this about class or party, he is a killer. To all my left wing friends, maybe you should remember the "Call to Civility" that our President made.
kluetkemeye 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kluetkemeye So what does your left wing brothers think about my featured video?
EthnicCleanser01 2 weeks ago
@kluetkemeye that "call for civility" was aimed at US, not his side. they are still expected to call us every nasty thing they can think of, and accuse us of the most outlandish acts even if they aren't actually possible
jrooksable 1 week ago
OMG THAT CONGRESSMEN EMBARRASINGLY DUMB!!!!
BIZARRE.
HE THE BEST ARIZ CAN DO.
REMIND ME NEVER TO GO THERE ANYMORE.
fidobarks 2 weeks ago
LOVE LAWRENCE
KNOWS HOW TO MAKE MINCEMEAT OF THOSE DUMB GUN WHORES.
fidobarks 2 weeks ago
Hey Lawrence, Harvard graduate, Senator Moynihan’s aide, on Bill Clinton’s staff, and high level meetings in the Oval Office! Daddy worked hard to pay for your college, all those talks around the dinner table about going far, you must really be a disappointment to him, because no matter how hard you try, you will never be President! You will never even be considered for President! Ron Paul has a better chance! How does it feel to have your whole career boil down to being a liberal puppet?
incirlik1 3 weeks ago
@incirlik1 jealous of someone smarter than you, dummy?
louisrr01 2 weeks ago
That congressman is a good man. If I was him I would have reach over and bitch slapped that talking head and said shout your mouth when I am trying to talk.
neuralresonate 3 weeks ago
@neuralresonate looks like that hairlip has already been "bitch slapped."
louisrr01 2 weeks ago
I've only just now truly familiarized myself with O'Donnell as an interviewer. It seems all he does is shout people down without giving them a chance to complete a single thought. He's even worse than O'Reilly in that regard.
DetCrockett7 3 weeks ago
@DetCrockett7 No, he does not put up with right-wing BS and illogical gibberish.
louisrr01 2 weeks ago
@louisrr01
Pal, practically all he does is interrupt his guests and talk over them. That's got nothing to do with being left-wing or right-wing, or somewhere in between. You can stand against "right-wing BS and illogical gibberish" without conducting yourself like a loudmouth in a bar.
And his argument here was idiotic anyway. He blames the individual for the first ten bullets, but the law for the rest of them? Stupid.
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
@DetCrockett7 Well, from what I heard, in 2003, you weren't allowed to buy magazines (or "clips") that contained more than 10 bullets, and in 2004, Arizona lifted this limit to magazines of 31 bullets. What the guy is trying to say is "why did the politicians NEED to increase the amount of bullets?"
I also kind of agree with the other guy. You can't blame guns in general, you blame the user. Not everyone with a gun commits murders, and not every murder is done with a gun...
SsJVasto 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from DailyCallerVideo
@SsJVasto I know that. My point is that O'Donnell's argument is ridiculous. If the law hadn't been changed, and Loughner had only been able to pack 10 rounds per magazine, he simply could have packed a couple more guns, and still gotten off the 30 rounds. Hence, the change in the law didn't really affect a thing.
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
@DetCrockett7 no. he only had 1 gun. he didn't bring 2 or 3. he brought 1! if the ban hadn't expired, more people would be alive. he wasn't expecting to be taken down while changing clips. what is wrong with you?
alexwilliams2962 2 weeks ago
@alexwilliams2962 Wow, you are dense.
Of course he only had one gun. MY POINT, Einstein, is that under the old law, Loughner could have just packed a couple more guns TO MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE IN THE NUMBER OF ROUNDS. There was a limit to the number of rounds per magazine, not to the number of guns carried. Not to mention, he simply could have obtained a gun with over ten rounds illegally anyway.
Got it?
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
@DetCrockett7 read my 1st message again. why are you inventing scenarios? chances are he only had ONE gun, so no matter what, that's all he would have brought. the point is that he wasn't expecting ANY problems reloading. so he would have had lots of clips with only 10 rounds apiece
alexwilliams2962 2 weeks ago
@alexwilliams2962 It's still a ludicrous argument. And it's not that I'm "inventing" scenarios; rather, I'm being logical as to what likely would have happened instead.
The problem with your--and O'Donnell's--argument is that you're assuming Loughner would have obeyed the law as far as the ban was concerned. We're talking about a murderer here. If he's going to kill people, do you honestly think he'll think twice about breaking a gun law?
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
@DetCrockett7 and lets pretend for a minute that he did bring 2 guns. with the ban in place, that would have meant 20 bullets before having to reload instead of 31. either way, the ban would have saved lives and they would have tackled him sooner.
alexwilliams2962 2 weeks ago
@alexwilliams2962 "Lets pretend for a minute that he did bring 2 guns" . . . "that would have meant 20 bullets before having to reload instead of 31 . . ."
You don't read too well, do you? I said two MORE guns, meaning THREE in all, the point being, genius, that he would still have thirty bullets to fire in all.
And again, he still could have simply obtained an illegal assault weapon with at least a 30-round capacity anyway.
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
@DetCrockett7 so he would need 3 guns before your ridiculous possibility makes sense. u still haven't addressed the fact that he didn't think reloading would be a problem. wouldn't it be more logical to assume that he would have just brought a bunch of clips instead of a bunch of guns? come on man. u know your argument is absurd. the ban would have saved lives. THERE'S NO REASON FOR A CLIP TO HOLD 30 BULLETS!!!!!
alexwilliams2962 2 weeks ago
@alexwilliams2962 You really need to work on your logical reasoning skills, pal.
The whole reloading issue, that you and O'Donnell are fixated upon, is actually moot if you think about it. I'm going to sound redundant here, but I'm repeating this because I just don't think you're getting it: Ban or no ban, Loughner STILL could have obtained the same weapon, via illegal means (the black market). It amazes me that you and O'Donnell don't grasp that.
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
@alexwilliams2962 (cont'd from before)
Also, if Loughner carried the three guns with 10 clips each, reloading still wouldn't be an issue. It takes far less time to simply switch to another gun and begin firing, than it does to reload the same weapon. Again, this is just common sense, and the fact that you and O'Donnell are overlooking this obvious possibility is nothing short of astounding.
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
@alexwilliams2962 (conclusion)
To answer your actual question: It's POSSIBLE Loughner would have just brought more clips, sure. But it's far from definite. Again, though, he may have prepared for the incident differently, or he may have still gotten the same weapon, just illegally.
And yes, there is a reason for a clip to hold 30 bullets, or more--an obvious one: When you're dealing with OPPOSITION with that kind of capability.
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
@DetCrockett7 1. if the ban was in place, i SERIOUSLY DOUBT he would have been able to get a 30 bullet clip on his own. that would be onerous enough for anyone, but we're talking about a person so demented it's hard to imagine him even being able dress himself in the morning
alexwilliams2962 2 weeks ago
@alexwilliams2962 (response to your point 1.)
Sure he could have, are you joking? All you have to do is know the right people--and it's not that hard. And you're exaggerating the extent of Loughner's problems. Despite his obvious psychological shortcomings, he was functionally fully competent.
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
@DetCrockett7 2. u came close to admitting this but couldn't quite get there: it's much more LOGICAL to assume that he would have brought more clips instead of more guns. i believe he only owned 1 gun, and he wasn't rich. clips are relatively inexpensive. my point all along was that the multiple gun hypothetical is just dumb. if there'd been a ban in place, we have every reason to think that he would've made up for it by buying MORE CLIPS - NOT GUNS
alexwilliams2962 2 weeks ago
@alexwilliams2962 (response to your point 2.)
No, it is not more logical. Just because he only owned one gun for this incident, under the given circumstances, doesn't mean he would not have obtained more--or none at all, even--had the circumstances been different. ANY change in circumstance could have altered the outcome here dramatically. It's not limited to Loughner's access to weapons, or the laws governing those weapons.
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
@DetCrockett7 3. it goes without saying that he COULD have brought more guns or done something else that neither u nor i have thought of. that's just reality. the question still is whether it should be this easy to buy 30 clip rounds. if u think u really need that many bullets for self-defense then there's something VERY WRONG with your lifestyle. monsters like loughner should not be able to buy this stuff at Sam's club. don't see how any objective person could disagree
alexwilliams2962 2 weeks ago
@alexwilliams2962 (response to your point 3.)
Well, no, that wasn't the question, actually. But to address it, sure, it shouldn't be "easy" to buy any number of rounds, let alone 30 or more.
As to the self-defense question, you're wrong, because you simply don't know if you'll need that many rounds or not. In a typical situation involving guns, you wouldn't even need a standard six. But situations aren't always typical.
DetCrockett7 2 weeks ago
the congressman nailed him to a cross at the end. took lawrence o'donnell's reasoning to its obvious conclusion and made him look like an ass.
UltraProle21 3 weeks ago
@UltraProle21 the congressman did nothing but use the usual GOD rational to justify his outrageous position.
louisrr01 2 weeks ago
So, Lawrence O'Donnell wants to assume that the shooter is a law abiding citizen who only purchases legally obtained magazines? Making 10+ round magazines illegal takes those magazines out of the hands of law abiding citizens, not killers.
ThenErikSaid 3 weeks ago
@ThenErikSaid no, the shoot was a right-wing, working-class, hateful fool.
louisrr01 2 weeks ago
GOD I want to smack that clown! why does MSNBC give him a show? oh, wait, it's MSNBC, never mind
jrooksable 3 weeks ago
@jrooksable Clown? You idiot.
louisrr01 2 weeks ago
Surprised people go after O'Reilly all the time, yet Lawrence O'Donnell and the other MSNBC loons always seem to gets a pass when they act the same way.
RUTGERSpaul 3 weeks ago
@TheDukeljk No I'm high on weed and I'm still smarter than you.
MrBradShafer 3 weeks ago
Stupid republicans.... I bet if they read another book other than the Bible, they might just learn something. But then they would have to deal with actually knowing what they're talking about.....
MrBradShafer 3 weeks ago
@MrBradShafer You are high on cocaine.
TheDukeljk 3 weeks ago
dont get silly? as if to say this guy while planning his murder would not use a 30 round clip because it would be illegal? lmao no wonder msnbc has zero credibilty! is this o'donnel related to rosie or somthing?
MrGodgutsguns 3 weeks ago
I'd sure want a bigger magazine if thugs were crashing in my front door! In a free country, even lunatics can get a gun, but if we lose our gun rights only the thieves and thugs will have them.
MemoryTechnologies 3 weeks ago
I love how Lawrence always tries to corner people and fails. D-bag.
9pt9 4 weeks ago
wow lawrence is retarded. if he was going to shoot people anyway he would of used something.
thekidofva 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Obama's a complete fraud and a mordant disgrace.
TheWhiteEuropeans 1 month ago
Loud Mouth Lawrence (LML) at it again!
LiveFreeorDieGuy 1 month ago
Reloading takes a second...magazine capacity is a red herring. This reporter is a POS and a total fraud.
TheMadronas 1 month ago
Not a lot of brain power in Lawrence odonnell. He's a jackass.
ontario1727 1 month ago
@ontario1727 I have never seen anything like this.To be honest I despise Olberman.I thought he was the very Idea of what leftist media outlets do.They refuse to let the opposition or guest answer the questions they are asked.Compared to this lawerence odonell asshole Olberman is one of the farest most mild mannered,well thoughout well spoken liberal interviewers I have ever seen.This proves how non violent conservatives are.Im the exception.I would beat the fuck out of this rude cocksucker.
jays2474 1 month ago
Don't be silly!!
M51210 1 month ago
PATHETIC GUN-nut REPUBLICANS can't give up their LOVE OF DEATH. To even suggest that that ridiculous 31-bullet clip should not be allowed, would stop the THRILL these gun-NUTS get up their pants when they UNLOAD on a child or a innocent. They are SHAMELESS, ANTI-AMERICAN CLOWNS. Pathetic GUN-nuts are INCAPABLE of reason, when it comes to protecting our citizens. Just vote them out. Now. Congressman nut-job says... KEEP THE MURDER-clips. LET MURDERERS KEEP THEIR MURDER WEAPONS. Pathetic!
medartist01 1 month ago
@medartist01 weak minded liberals..do anything to get a vote..even if it means selling your morals down the road..who the fuck is going to protect you against disgruntled Opinionated Shock jock self proclaimed millionaire " media reporters "
custardpie40 1 month ago
Comment removed
BudDickman 1 month ago
@medartist01 You are a complete idiot.IT is the americans right to bare arms by our FOUNDING FATHERS.The SUPREME COURT HAS SEEN IT OUR WAY.You make me want to vomit with your unload on a child comment.You are whats wrong with the world.Thank god most lefist arent like you.While idiots like you scream about criminals rights while trying to take away the rights of LAW ABIDING CITIZENS we need the right to bare arms to protect our families from the violent criminal you assholes care so much about.
jays2474 1 month ago
@medartist01 Why dont you look up how many time a year a gun protects a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN & thier family from violents criminals?The statistics make anti gun nut look foolish.Everything including the constitution of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS ON OUR SIDE.Yet you anti gun nuts are so arrogant you keep running your mouths.But thats why you have freesom of speech also our rights because of the constitution.You are incapable of reason that is seen by your gunning down children comment.
jays2474 1 month ago
if we didn't allow arabs to be on planes there wouldn't have been a 9/11 stop with all these stupid hypotheticals
THEEck5000 1 month ago
Lawrence went to town on Huckleberry Hound
deutschland08fn 1 month ago
HAHAHAHA only in america could getting rid of guns be classed as 'silly' hilarious!
icemanisdangerous 1 month ago
Federal law does not actually eliminate the larger capacity magazine. Silly socialist.
jeebiskebowski 1 month ago
lawrence o'donnell is such an angry man
paths1992 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please watch my story "TIFFANY LEBOUEF SEEKS JUSTICE" They hid my only evidence and lied about it then they made me "TAKE THE DEAL" or go to Prison for 9 + yrs. This is crazy stuff. They have given me 2 strikes and one more brush with the law of any kind will send me to "PRISON FOR LIFE"..... HELP MEEEEEEEE!
I have documents to PROVE my innocence but no one will even look at it. What is going on with this country???
joanarc1111 1 month ago
This guy is attacking the wrong person. Attack the guy that shot the people. People cannot continue to blame government when its convenient. This is the problem with society, not everyone sees things the same way, its been this way since civilization. Some laws will pass and some wont, what society needs to do is get up and vote and be vocal that way, sitting at home complaining about the laws and the officials appointed are not going to help the world. Get your butts up and VOTE.
AABREU80 1 month ago
@AABREU80 "Attacking the guy that shot the people" is NOT O'Donnell's MO. The 10 people who watch his show might not tune in otherwise.
exmarine66 1 month ago
Did he not know how to reload his weapon?
luke55664 1 month ago
lawrence is a silly man. we should all just go revolutionary war black powder style so people can die of boredom
joelmcentire1 1 month ago
LEAN FORWARD lmao
K131399 1 month ago
you get old enough and you come to the realization that a larger sect of society than you want to admit is simply unable to fully grasp complex issues. it certainly doesnt help when demented windbags like odonnel are allowed to be on the air. and i do mean allowed to be on the air, he certainly isnt there for his ratings.
K131399 1 month ago
Yes point your finger at needing god in your life to prevent gun related crimes. What a tool bag.
hmasterpiece85 2 months ago
@hmasterpiece85 wouldnt the biggest tool bag be the fool who points his finger at needing an overbearing government to prevent anything?
K131399 1 month ago
@K131399 Keep your GOP propaganda non sense to yourself. Nobody is saying the government needs to control your life, but keeping say cooperate america honest and in check is needed. Turn off FOX News and get a clue.
hmasterpiece85 1 month ago
Guns don't think. People kill people, it's not the guns fault. Obama is responsible by appointing idiots who think it's clever to let guns walk, just because they believe they cannot control and dominate the American people wile the people have freedom and the constitutional right have a gun.
rexiedexie1 2 months ago
Lawrence is such a nut lol.
Slyonethegreat 2 months ago
good point by pravda comrade Odonnell ..even obama didnt smuggle 30 round magazines to the narco terrorists in mexico and thus ,so far only two US border agents and perhaps 200 mexican civillians have been murdered with these gifts from obama;s DOJ to the cartel thuggistas..
woodenmajor 2 months ago
What if, What if...
What if he stole a 30 magazine Bullets omg I hate what ifs.
Salvysahagun 3 months ago
these stupid liberals have NO understanding of the purpose behind the 2nd amendment.....it wasn't soley to protect people from each other, but from the government. They don't even know they're helping the elites in making us vulnerable......
somuch4freedom 3 months ago
@somuch4freedom they know exactly what they're doing, and things wont change unless these freaks start getting called out on their actual motives. just have a good laugh at the fact that this moron has absolutely no viewers.
K131399 1 month ago
Those both guys are really smart but can be a bit too much "on fire" into theyr own point of view / or cause(? en francais)
Good for All!
1MoreWorld 3 months ago
Heres an idea how bout mandatory back ground checks in all states!!!!
bizzleblue38 3 months ago
So odoneel thinks it ok to have a gun as long as it has ten bullets? What planet is this idiot from? How bout no gun dumb ass, then no one would have been shot n killed!!!!! Time to EPC Odoneel!!! Lock em up!!!!
bizzleblue38 3 months ago
@bizzleblue38 Actually, Odonnell has more than once said on TV that if he was president, all guns would be banned, so before you call him an idiot why don't you actually look up his beliefs...idiot...have a nice day.
mevansmusic 2 months ago
@mevansmusic He would NEVER say that......Prove it you gun loving idiot! Post a video or link if it's true!
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 lol well he has i'm not gonna look up every episode i think he's the man i watch him every night but ur just too stupid to talk to please dont respond to this bye
mevansmusic 1 month ago
@mevansmusic From your spelling and poor grammer, I can assume you are a FOX news fan. And you are calling me stupid, LOL!
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 actually i'm in college and i get laid unlike you :)
mevansmusic 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 fox news fans have higher standards of living and higher IQs . so what are you trying to say?
joelmcentire1 1 month ago
@joelmcentire1 It was reported that FOX (faux) NEWS viewers have less knowledge about facts and actual news than any other group of viewers on television. Sorry to let you down like that. But all one has to do is look at this BS on the Iowa Caucuses. Get real! Neither Ron Paul, Santorum, Bachmann, nor Gingrich has any chance of ever becoming president. The religious right will never win in a general election, and that is what the GOP has become. Good luck, you will need it Nov.
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 well your statement about fox news fans being fact deficient isn't a quantifiable stat so you really don't have anything to back it up. but i have a stat. way more people watch fox news than msnbc with those lunatic hosts, o donnell , chris mathews and that fourteen year old boy rachael maddow. oh i got another stat for you. we are 16 trillion dollars in debt. because of obama. good luck to you in Nov your going to need it
joelmcentire1 1 month ago
@joelmcentire1 Was on National news so it is "quantifiable" and a FACT. And as far as FOX news goes, O'Reilly's ratings are higher, I'll admit. But they are only 1.8 million out of 350 million!
So that is only a miniscule number over MSNBC! Idiot! Keep drinking the GOP Koolaid!
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 350 million huh? i guess you count illegal aliens in there. there are not quite that many american citizens. what your numbers show is that nobody watches the news in this country, but in comparison msnbc has nobody even close to O'reilly. not even close. you liberals are all on youtube giving thumbs up to all the libs and thumbs down to all the conservatives. i must be one of five conservatives that is online. we conservatives work. you guys occupy seseme street
joelmcentire1 1 month ago
@joelmcentire1 Typical idiot Republican that changes the subject! The number of people in the country has nothing to do with illegal aliens. Whether illegal or legal, they watch television and there are at least 350 million. So O'Reilly has 1.85 million as watchers in his latest Neilsen's. That is miniscule! So keep fooling yourself for all I care and watch FAUX NEWS if you want. Your lack of knowledge and stupidity proved my point.
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 why don't you spit the number of people that watch the Ed show on msnbc. he shares the same block. perhaps that would give us a new definition of the word miniscule. you are comparing 1.85 million to all humans in america to make your point sound cooler than it really is. why stop there? how many people are in the world? bill's numbers just got smaller. you are quite good at name calling too. a usual liberal trait.
joelmcentire1 1 month ago
@joelmcentire1 Switched between O'Reilly and the Ed Show as I always do. O'Reilly hocking his book again and doing a story on horse races, and street interviews, REAL NEWS! LOL. His show is a joke and you continue to prove it, as you can take the truth about as well as Newt Gingrich! Get ready for an Obama landslide!
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 i admit that obama may win. but by no landslide. enough talking points, just admit the fact that no president has been re-elected with such a low approval rating. I think the only way he can win is if the GOP just does something terribly off key. this time baby's mamas won't get off the couch to keep the first black president in. He didn't change one thing about washington politics. hope and change. uh huh sure. i cant believe you swallowed that pill.
joelmcentire1 1 month ago
@joelmcentire1 I have no illusions and swallowed no pill. The fact is the Republican Party has been co-opted by the religious right and the Tea Party maniacs and has lost all credibility. Not one of the would be nominees running have any intention of changing America, except maybe Ron Paul, and even he is too extreme even for the GOP. The American voter wants a middle of the road president. And they have one in the White House right now. As the economy improves Obama will win.
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 obama won't win.He is nowhere near the middle of the road save on foreign policy. i'll give him that. but fiscally he is the most left since FDR and americans don't like it. admit he could not have won if he was not our first black president. 95% black vote. yeah I'll bet those innercity kids with sagging pants really know the facts. Mitt Romney is as middle of the road as they come. that is a fact
joelmcentire1 1 month ago
@joelmcentire1 I give up. You are delusional. On O'Reilly tonight the poll on Gay's serving in the military was 66% yes, 22% no. That is in agreement with Obama and is middle of the road. That was on FOX!! So you can think Romney is middle of the road, with his religious stupidity, and Santorum's blatant racist comment today of "Blacks" (check it out on youtube) and Gingrich's elitism. Go ahead and think any one of them has a chance. You will be sorely dissapointed this Nov.
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 you seem to not like religious people. but if obama happens to lose by some freak off chance election, will you be disappointed? Or will you move to europe where they live the life you seem to want? you seem to think you could not stand to have a religious president. Is it true?
joelmcentire1 1 month ago
@joelmcentire1 Most of the GOP candidates pretend to be religious and some probably are. However I do not want a president that talks to God. We had one named GW. One of the worst of all time. Religion, as I have said before is the scourge of the civilized world. It has caused more wars, hatred and bigotry in the name of God than anything. All religions want to convert others, as theirs is the only "true religion" Bunk! God does not take sides...Tebow has not figured that out yet!
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 i think tebow does exactly what he has a God given right to do. he doesn't seem to be a bad guy at all. I don't think GW was very bad either. see you can't judge GW as the worst when you don't even know the voting record of James Garfield. now before you google it, don't worry, garfield wasn't that bad. its just you can't even name all the presidents so it is hard to determine. would you move to europe if romney won to escape all the blood and terror you speak of?
joelmcentire1 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 I agreed until your stupid Tebow coment.This kid has done nothing at all but pray on the field like thousands of players before him but is scorned because he made an anti abortion commercial with his mom.Man has used religion to do horrible things but they have used communism also.I would rather have faith in a loving god than a communist dictator,because after all they have caused the deaths of millions & millions of innocent people throughout the history of man too
jays2474 1 month ago
@jays2474 Yes you are right, I suppose I should not blame Tebow for organized religion. But the hatred and bigotry of each religion pitted against the other is the scourge of man.
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
@TerryComo2010 terry the point is not to not let gays serve, the point is to keep it to yourself. You seem to have a misinterpretation of what these candidates are trying to say. Wouldnt it be fair to ask the heterosexual soldiers if they feel comfortable knowing that one of their fellows servicemen is gay?. Everyone wants rights passed for THEMSELVES instead of looking how a law can benefit EVERYONE. Open your eyes buddy and stop blinding yourself with your self absorbed mentality.
AABREU80 1 month ago
O'Donnell=facts, reason, personal responsibility
Franks=usual political ideological lie on top of lie and everything is always everyone else's fault. And when you get caught being stupid--get more stupid.
Edenkoben1779 3 months ago
Damn... This GOPer is a seriously disingenuous intellectually dishonest little whore for the gun lobby. I wonder how much they contribute to his campaign?
leesagrrl 3 months ago
Before the Iraq war, Iraq's citizens were just as heavily armed as U.S. citizens, yet they were not a free society. It takes more that just gun ownership to make a nation free. I'm not for gun control, just sayin'....
politicoochie09 3 months ago
Lawrence, an actor, sits in a cushy little chair, making moral judgements from the cushy side lines... what an rear-end...
truth123ify 3 months ago
Lawrence is a moron
truth123ify 3 months ago
what a typical fucking MSNBC statist know-it-all moral elitist faggot
TheMarksmenCat 3 months ago
@TheMarksmenCat As they say must take one to know one?
TerryComo2010 1 month ago
What was the purpose of this asinine interview? MSNBC -'nuff said.
LocustIvy 3 months ago
If someone with a CCW was allowed to be there, it probably would've been over a LOT sooner. Someone should have put a bullet in Loughner's head 5 seconds after he pulled that gun out.
kdbrown777 3 months ago
@kdbrown777 There was such a man there; he did nothing. Why? Because it takes 4 minutes to learn how to load and shoot a pistol but hundreds of hours of training to recognize when to use it, against whom to use it, and once unholstered to use it in such a situation with extreme accuracy and with intent to kill the target and ONLY that target. Obviously, this is too far beyond the capacity of the typical CCW adolescent-thinking blowhard..
Edenkoben1779 3 months ago
@Edenkoben1779 I assume you are trained, maybe a military man.
You are so right.
The basic to make usefull teach is this : with intent to kill the target and ONLY that target.
To save lives,
good for all.
1MoreWorld 3 months ago
MSNBC; Chris Matthews, Al Sharpton, Ed Shults, O'Donnell and Rachel Maddow. That ridiculous line-up says it all; no insults required.
gotyourtongue 3 months ago
DAMN O'Donnell, i like your show, but damn, let the man answer the question!!
rudeboy7464 3 months ago