dude your goberment are the terrorist. Sure she havent done anything and still call her a terrorist. ... But your country kill 1000nds of children and people but no they are not terrorist cause they have bombs with a llitle thing called democracy... well ill call it semi-democracy... so really think about it and tell me who is the real terrorist..... google it
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i dont know about sotomayer and it doesnt matter now bc this things already over but does anybody else care that our president is friends with a terrorist. some people are so stupid. way to go liberals. hey next time lets all vote for osama binladin
How about come up with proof that she sponsored terrorists? Address that please. And name one shameless thing said about Palin. It´s impossible NOT to make fun of what she says. What double standard? You´re comparing Sotomayor to Palin? Even conservatives cringe when she says stupid things like department of law. Stick to the facts. No one would ever call Palin a terrorist. You´re not aware of the concept of double standard because you don´t know what it means.
TYT and other Palin-haters generally don't care about what she actually did. They just focus all their derision on her verbal mistakes, usually in a juvenille namecalling fashion. These "conservatives" called Sotomayor a terrorist because of things she said. TYT is the pot calling the kettle black.
Perhaps Palin is a poor speaker, but she was an incredibly effective leader. Basically she's the direct opposite of obama. Strange that some people prefer great speeches over actual results.
What exactly did she say that was terrorist? Maybe she did but I haven´t found that. All the google searches I did only debunked the story. Yes, it´s what Palin did to my state that I don´t like. Even though policy IS words, forget she said humans and dinosaurs lived together. She charged women for their own rape kits and used my money to sue the EPA to take polar bears off the endangered species list. Huge waste of money.
I'm afraid you've been misinformed, like all Palin-haters. The Wasilla police dept. had been charging for rape examination kits long before Palin was mayor. As soon as she learned of it, she instituted a statewide ban on the practice.
Concerning lawsuits, democrats wasted hundreds of thousands of tax-dollars on frivolous FOIA charges against Palin. She was never found guilty, but the court costs caused the first state deficit since Palin became governor, so she resigned to end this waste.
Are from AK? I am. The way I understand it, She fired the police chief and then installed the police chief who instituted this practice. She is definitely NOT the one who stopped it. It was definitely Eric Croft who introduced state legislation to stop it. It couldn´t possibly have been Palin because the mayor of Wasilla DOESN¨T introduce state legislation. Branchflower, in the investigation, found she DID violate ethics rules in troopergate. You didn´t address my other points at all.
I find it sad that even Alaska residents are so misinformed about Palin. Once again, the practice existed long before she was mayor. It was not brought to the public's attention until years later when she was governor. Croft introduced the bill that banned it, and Palin approved it.
Also, she was NOT GUILTY in troopergate. The judge ruled that the governor has the right to fire her direct employees for any reason or no reason at all, just like employers at a real job. What source are you using?
Mona what source am I using? Google it yourself, I´m tired of spoon feeding you. Oh, very comforting, she has a right to have no reason at all. So do you.
No reason at all like Obama wants to kill my baby and dinosaurs and people lived together. If you think she´s a genius then I give up.
Obama fired all of Bush's cabinet members when he became president, is he corrupt for doing the exact same thing Palin did? If you work directly for someone and you refuse to cooperate, why should they NOT fire you?
TYT has already over-covered all of Palin's speech blunders, it's basically all they do. She is bad at speeches, but her actual RESULTS as governor are nothing short of amazing. She is the opposite of obama, who has nothing but amazing speeches. Genius or not, she is more effective.
her actions in the way she handle the trooper incident was unethical the investigators said she behaved in an unethical way why dont you look up the report
JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA WEEEEEE!!!!!! JAJAJA exactamentee!!!! uuuuuuugh yo ODIO cmo los gringos hablan el espanish!! no pueden decil soTomayor? tan difisil es? DIOS MIO!!! na na pero tas pasa/pasao!! conservatives o to hell jajaja q funny! =]
i know you wont answer but how is she a terrorist-do you know what a terrorist is? if anyones a terrorist its george bush and the clowns that voted for him
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
what about terrorist obama? yes i know what a terrorist is. according to homeland security a terrorist is anyone who disagrees with federal authority.
At least he did a few positive things for this country. If I'd been holding my breath waiting for obama to do something anywhere near the direction considered positive, I'd have died of anoxia long ago... I just hope this country can survive the next few years until we can get someone in here that actually believes in the American way of life.
Let the repubs keep bringing up all this SOS they did in the general election as all it will do is backfire on them again and make them as extink as the dinosours as rats always jump a sinking ship.
I'm glad that you point out how logic prevails on this issue. There is no way any one can make any connection with Sonia and support of violent crimes. Cenk you make a good balance here. Good work.
Lmao Mein Kampf Hitler was not a socialist. He was a fascist. If you have studied fascism and the rise of fascism of the Weimar Republic, you would see that they are anti communist. Fascism is a totalitarian, militaristic regime. They are not National Socialists such as the USSR. National Socialists such as the USSR were executed and sent to death camps all over Europe.Having social aspects to your government doesnt make you socialist.France=social aspects to government but is not socialist.
Now I'm really confused because I always had the understanding that conservatives were republicans and liberals were democrats. What are the ideas that makes all of them differ?
Basically party agenda. JFK was pretty conservative and in 1976 Jimmy Carter was considered conservative. Rudy Guiliani is pretty liberal for a republican, as is John Mccain. Conservative republicans hated his nomination in 2008. Liberal republicans are called RINO's by conservative republicans- republican in name only.
You want to know why they make commericals like that? Most of the population are zombie sheep due to all the medication they take, the toxins in the air, fluoride and chemicals in the water, and their unused brain cells due to overload of television. Thus they are easily brainwashed.
no no she is not, the one who is connected is Hillarly Clinton who in order to get votes convinced her husband to commute the sentences of several terrorist from that territory
Idiota tu nombre es gangsta papi no se por que para algunos de los latinos de Estados Unidos se asocian con esos estereotipos de ser gangster y una malas persona yo e viajado a los Estados Unidos muchas veses y nunca e sido victima de racismo ni nada de eso eres un racista ignorate que odia a la jente blaca por que piensas que ellos tienen la culpa de todas cosas malas que te pasan te deberias abochornar tus padre viajaron a los Estados Unidos a buscar un buen futuro y tu lo desperdicias
"Committee for Justice"? Why not just go all out, and call themselves the New Committee for Public Safety? I'm sure that Herr Buchanan would be happy to oversee it.
Fear politics. The only strategy Republicans have had for the past 30 years. And you working class nitwits living paycheck to paycheck eat it up.
Vote more out of fear of THE OTHER. Meanwhile, Republicans vote for every measure that insures your jobs go elsewhere; that insures unions become weaker; that insures the middle class will continue to dwindle; that insures you will become beholden to corporate interests.
Keep voting for the fear, nitwits. You deserve the Republican ass-fucking.
Anyway, now that the liberals changed the playing field, now the GOP can feel free to nominate guys who have said that Mexicans are a bunch of spics, and get away with it. Not too bad...I guess the GOP gets something good out of this after all.
Leave it to the liberals to further retard the race issue and keep it festering.
Shes a racist. And she'll get confirmed. But now you liberals changed the playing field...and when a GOP judge goes for confirmation and it turns out he said something about hispanics and blacks...you liberals cannot utter a word! We will just say "Sotomayor got a pass...shouldnt Imus too?"
You liberals are all about double standard. You'll lose in 2010. Your too full of yourselves, and it will bite you, trust me.
Every Republican on the board was racist. They didn't even hide it that well... A bunch of white guys scared ot a little women... Why don't they just og cheet on their wives like all the other republicans..
They're going after Sotomayor and her affiliation with La Raza. The group La Raza itself is more of a community based PAC for good, but the committee for justice is trying to tie a puerto rican direct action group to her because this group allegedly received funding from La Raza.
If you thought the Bill Ayers connection was thin. This makes a spiderweb strand look like one of the golden gate bridge cables.
Basically, you represent exactly what he republican party is now: a stale brand about to be pulled off the shelves, who thinks everyone but them is a communist and terrorist. What does the GOP even stand for anymore? Family values, amidst affair after affair among its leadership? National security, after we have created the conditions for hundreds of new terrorists? Meritocracy, when you produce anti-intellectual morons like Palin? Good luck with your old can of GOP. We are moving on.
When I see a list of stupidity like this, I really am baffled. Rather than your infantile, tired, simplistic drivel about "what you republicans stand for", why are you so incapable of sticking to the discrete issues that are mentioned? See a pattern here, brainless? As soon as people mention very specific issues they have with Obama, you hopeless fucktards trot out your generic indictments of all things republican.
Not exactly responsive to the issues raised, twit.
I have no obligation to stick to the issues mentioned. You are not informed enough about the issues to have a substantive debate. I am not even generalizing the behavior of republicans. The fact remains that the Republican brand is polling terribly with the American people, yet none of you wants to analyze where you might be going wrong. Your incessant prattle about democratic candidates being terrorists and communists so worn out.
The GOP is polling bad (better latley tho) with the American people, because Bush got us into a war we needed not to be in, and the republican congress rubber stamped it...thats why Americans turned away from the GOP...that plus Bush (and the dems) were terrible for the economy and spent to much. Otherwise America is center-right...but they have no one to vote for.
Hah, too funny. You've mentioned the republican "brand" a few times now. You are EXACTLY the type of imbecile I was commenting on over drinks with friends the other day. Someone who buys into the Obama PR machine and the whole PR driven approach to his presidency. It's a sad, sad spectacle, and a sad indication of the state of politics in general.
And I dont even know what comments you are referring to or what the context is. Half the time I am debating egotistical people like you throwing out a bunch of fallacious stats about black on white crimes rates or more traditional racist comments about black people being generally lazy and misbehaved. I don't let these people off the hook, but people like you are not important enough for me to hate. Like I said, you are incapable of forming arguments. FYI, Your comment said what Obama "did".
The Repugs have transformed themselves into nothing more than a very sick bigoted cult now. And Everyone, anyone with a sane mind, can see this manifestation of vindictive desperation clear as crystal! When all else fails ....make up somethin'...anything...any ol' garbage... so long as it's a smear!
No wonder the GOP's found itself in No-Man's Land! And, judging by their behaviour, it seems they want to remain there! Repugnant!
What the fuck is up with the republican party constantly screaming " Terrorist! " or " Communist! "?
Don't they realize that their fear tactics don't work any more? Just keep using the same tactics that lost you the last election republicans, Obama will enjoy his second term
And further more, I don't even really give a damn about Bush and the Saudis. Terrorist is an extreme that needs to be applied to actual terrorists. La Raza is not a terrorist group, does really have anything in there statements, record, or history to justify that term, and nor does Sotomayer. The republicans continue to suffer from brain damage, and wnt seek medical help because they are equitable health care too. Everyone is just laughing at this point. It over, you ALL lose. Goodbye.
Good God, the point of the ad was not to "connect" Sotomayor to Bill Ayers, as in claim a relationship between the two. Is this moron really that thick? The point is that for a second time, we're seeing Obama politically connected to someone who can be tied to terrorist sympathizers, however tangential the relationship. Not a strong case as for Sotomayor, but the connection definitely exists.
Politicians always have and always will be judged by the company they keep. Interesting that this...
Nobody is saying the ad is trying to connect them in a relationship. The ad is trying to compare the two in a ludicrous fashion, as in Obama has pick "another" one of these radical people. The shit didn't work before, has no relevance to Sotomayor's record or qualifications, or her completely uncontroversial background. Yeah, everyone is a terrorist sympathizer to republicans. But Bush's family ties to the Saudis and their investment in Bush family companies is a-ok. Fuck all you morons.
And don't forget Bush's really warm ties to the bin Laden family...who were swiftly flown out of the US at Bush's order minutes after the planes hit the WTC!
The GOP is a dying breed gasping for air with each vindictive dying breath it takes.
This stuff is irrelevant anyway. The cap and trade and healthcare disasters that loom on the horizon will seal Obama's fate - a one-term president who did more in four years to destroy this country than any prez. in history. With a major, whopping assist from the likes of that wretched human being Nancy Pelosi.
Listen, you imbeciles are free to lap up the bromides and platitudes that fill his daily speeches. By all means, encourage his narcissism. See where it gets you...and all of us.
You literally have to be a complete moron to believe Obama, who has been in office for a little over 5 months, is responsible for a health care crisis that has been emerging for the last 40 years due to poor cost control and over-utilization. The economy was and is going down the tubes due to the banking, lending, and rating industries, all of which started to go bad in 2006 and 2007, when YOUR boy was in office. Obama has started no wars and has initiated no scandals. Bush is the one you meant.
The issue is not who "caused" the healthcare mess. Surprise, surprise - another straw man offered up by an uninformed nimrod. In any event, the issue is that the so-called solution about to be rammed through congress is an absolute disaster, which will accomplish NOTHING beyond transferring healthcare costs to the wealthy and small businesses. Not good policy anytime, let alone in the midst of a recession.
You and I are on different planes, friend. Your level of understanding is laughable.
For once I agree. We Are on different levels of understanding policy. You can barely articulate a cogent argument, and think 5 months of a presidency can account for years of policy failure and circumstance throughout multiple presidencies. Go to hell. I get so tired of debating morons like you.
My comments regarding the healthcare and cap and trade proposals of Obama etal. are, by definition, forward looking. I'm referring to the grave damage that WILL be done if and when they are passed. Yet you insist on claiming that my beef is that Obama hasn't already solved these problems. Obviously, that in no way follows from what I've actually said, stop embarrassing yourself. You are either scrupulously dishonest or even less intelligent than I suspected. And that's saying something.
So your upset with Obama on based on what you believe his policies WILL accomplish, which will take years to see the result of. Hahaha. Debate on the externalities and consequences of policies is one thing. People like you, with magically intuition about this policy feels bad, are exactly the kind of people that don't need to be pontificating on policy at all. My comment was how your perception on what the policy will do is incorrect, based on what the bill says. Your the one off topic.
You ignorant college kids are comical. So much piss and vinegar, but so little common sense. Regarding healthcare, the numbers are out. Do you live in a cave? As it turns out, this so-called "reform" will do nothing more than 1) create a massive bureaucracy (that draws its share from the public teet) and 2) transfer wealth, an Obama theme. You ignorant, emotional college kids think such things happen without cost. That's because you' lack wisdom as to how the world works...
You see no significance that, despite the fact that the top 20% of earners pay 86% of the nation's income taxes, more than ever, the narrative has been crafted whereby the rich "aren't paying their share". Words like "freedom" and "fairness" are bandied about, without a moment's consideration of what happens in a society where a majority of people have no stake in government fiscal decisions and are in a position to essentially confiscate money from the wealthy, as needed.
Yes, I can see why your jealous of college kids like me, who can actually read and converse on a topic without spouting meaningless platitudes about what someone thinks Obama might do in the future. I am sorry you feel left out. Certainly the consensus on this page is that your a moron. Take your chatter elsewhere. I believe I already mentioned I am done with you. I have real work to do now. Have a nice day.
About what someone "thinks Obama might do in the future"? Are you really that dim? Obama's already doing it, brainless, He has been since the moment he became president. And his next installments - cap and trade and healthcare - will be his most harmful yet.
BUT, even the worst policies take time to do their harm. The damage will be done over a period of years, not immediately, moron.
In a nut shell, his decisions today are charting a course for disaster tomorrow.
If your talking about the fallacy relating to the fact that a consensus does not make something true, that need not apply to speaking about someone's personal attributes. If lots of people think your a moron, whether you are or not, is irrelevant. Your social position and ability to influence people is non-existent. This applies to you, moron.
My "social position and ability to influence people is non-existent"? Because a handful of foaming at the mouth, ignorant fucktards on youtube dislike me? That's one of the dumbest things i've ever read.
For chrissake, junior. Stop embarrassing yourself.
I am not obsessed with race, but the fact that you think you can live beyond race and doesn't have to consider its continuing political and social implications reveals you as the ignorant asshole you appear to be. Race is still salient in the lives of EVERYONE, including white people in this country whom believe that they are somehow beyond race or that their daily experience is not reflected in some part by their race and peoples reaction to their race. These are conversations grown-ups have.
Grammar lesson, "did" is past tense, yet you claim what obama did in 4 years has destroyed the country, when he actually hasn't done anything except a few executive orders, and did nothing to destroy the country. Were are in the situation we are in because of years of past policy failure , which was my point. So, your prediction that Obama will destroy the future because of what he might do is dumb. Stop talking to me. I have only responded to you on principle to point out your douchbaggery.
"The cap and trade and healthcare disasters that loom on the horizon will seal Obama's fate - a one-term president who did more in four years to destroy this country than any prez."
It's clear that I'm referring to his legacy - what it ill be at the end of his destructive, one term presidency. Your interpretation - that I'm referring to the PAST four years (2005-2009?) - is positively retarded. Stop embarrassing yourself. Delete that comment if you can.
Ah, upon further review of some of your comments I see that you are entirely obsessed with race. Every word you read, every point you analyze is filtered through your bizarre racial prism. It's amazing that people like you can't grasp how offensive you are to us reasonable folks. One needn't be a shrink to see that your racial animus is fueled by an all consuming bitterness/hatred. Watching you self-righteously project this onto others is comical. Dim, hypocritical stuff, moron.
I think the "wise Latino woman" is the one obsessed about race. No, you wont admit it, even though she said it 8 times, of course you wont see that she is a racist.
I am not obsessed with race, but the fact that you think you can live beyond race and doesn't have to consider its continuing political and social implications reveals you as the ignorant asshole you appear to be. Race is still salient in the lives of EVERYONE, including white people in this country whom believe that they are somehow beyond race or that their daily experience is not reflected in some part by their race and peoples reaction to their race. These are conversations grown-ups have.
- In 1954, several armed Puerto Rican separatists stormed the U.S. House of Reps., the gunfire wounding 5 congressmen. - In 1990, when thre was talk of the 3 separatists appearing alongside Nelson Mandela, who was making an appearance in NYC, then Mayor David Dinkins slammed them and said they had no business appearing with Mandela, or comparing their plight to his. - The President of the PRLDEF, of which Sotomayor was a Board member, issued a statement defending the men, saying: (cont'd)
Wow, thats about the stupidest connection anyone has tried to come up with. She is a board member (board members do not run organizations by the way, they are more like legal and financial oversight) of PRLDE, a group that didn't do anything, but its president (whom can issue any statement he wants, on his behalf and no one else's) issued a statement about what "many people" might believe. HAHAHAHAHAAHA.
I've alrady stated that I view the Sotomayor/Terrorist supporter connection as a weak one. But it exists, and it would have been nice if, say, she had resigned her board position in protest of the org's president supporting such criminals. It's called moral fiber, or moral courage, or character, or any one of those. A foreign concept to the likes of you, but still important to some people...
(cont'd) "He doesnt recognize that to many people in Puerto Rico, these are fighters for freedom and justice, for liberation, just as is Nelson Mandela, who himself advocated bearing arms. - clearly the link to Sotomayor is tenuous, but it certainly exists. The fact that the President of the PRLDEF, an organization in which Sotomayor held a position of leadership, defended these men using words like "freedom fighters" is a legit issue. Like it or not.
In reference to separatists who armed themselves and attacked the U.S. House of Representatives? Not many who were interested in still having acareer. And the obvious point here is that we're talking about the POTUS and a potential Supreme Court justice. Normal standards don't apply, for obvious reasons (one would think).
Chenk, Don't you realize that all these right wing nut jobs consider anyone, that DOES NOT believe as they do, a terrorist. The majority of the people in this country are terrorist because we voted for Obama.
YOUTUBE ADMINISTRATORS are controling the freedom of expression. They are part f the BNP in England and they do not allow anyone to express anything that might go against the participation of this party in this Forum. This is a shame as it only proves hipocrisy........
every one that disagrees with the dems is raise st.disagree with Republican tarrorist . both are made to make you cowtow. make you give up. its cheap an on American. see how it w rooks.
If thats the case why dont sean hannity and limbaugh do some hard hitting reporting on jack abremoff and his connection to the republican party or better yet ronald regan chenny and rumsfelds relationship with suddam hussein
so having faced more than 90 cases of discrimination & ruled against almost 80 of those makes her a racist? how the fuck is that a fact? supposing that she's "known as a racist to people" is NOT a fucking fact. that's called anecdotal evidence. since you're calling her a racist, how do you explain her ruling against the presented discrimination cases almost 80% of the time? is she a part time racist? if so, where are your "facts"; where is your "evidence"?
stfu shes has to be fair and do her job to move up into a position of power to be in the Supreme court.....Have you ever heard of La Raza? people will say all kinds of shit but, their goals are racist, period...Look into it, and dont turn the other cheek....Its all about the domination and the advancement of the latino/hispanic race.....Lets say if I was part of a organization for the advancement of the White race or white pride, do think I would be allowed to even be a judge at all?....NO.
yes. i've heard of la raza. i read that paper whenever i have a chance. nevertheless, the fact that she ruled AGAINST 79% of the discrimination cases presented to her is sufficient evidence to anyone that can rub together 2 brains cells.
also, la raza is not about domination. it's about advancement. there's nothing wrong with that.
"people will say all kinds of shit but their goals are racist period". i love the way you reason. it takes no logic at all.
here's the deal. if a race identified group is in a state of decline; better yet, if most of the people in a race identified group are in a vulnerable position, is it not intuitive for them to figure out ways to help themselves thereby ADVANCING themselves? am i not responsible, as a member of the village, for helping my neighbor? la raza is help from neighbors.
as a black nationalist, my primary concern is about making sure that black people get access to the american promise. why? because the majority has been denied access. it doesn't make me any kind of racist. it just means that my life's work is mainly about the health, education, material resource & overall wellbeing of my immediate community. does that mean i have distaste for the rest of humanity? of course not. it means that my people need my help the most. same goes for la raza.
Your last comment had nothing to do with the argument.. You were just kissing your own ass trying to sound intelligent lol.....Im a black nationalist blah blah wtf? stay on topic..
my black nationalist analogy was to show oyu the difference between a racist, segregationalist ideology versus being pro-national. if you can't get your head around that, it's your own shortcoming. just don't go around accusing someone of racism. in truth, i invited you to a reasonable discussion. but because you didn't agree, you shut down. that's what most people, who can't think, do. you fail.
the very fact that you can't accept me as a intelligent person & that i must "try to sound intelligent" speaks volumes for your own level of racism. like most neo-cons, you project. nothing is your own fault. you get uncomfortable when other race identified groups fight for their own piece of the american pie. NEWSFLASH: it's our country too.
Snap out of your ridiculous fantasy that every white person is racist and out to stop minorities from enjoying the American dream.....NEWSFLASH: Just remember what language your speaking and who created the American dream for everyone..
If you want to call me a racist for pointing a ACTUAL racist, lol then that says loads about YOUR logic........but thats the classic move for any moron
once again you bring up shit that wasn't even mentioned in our conversation....You need to keep up with all the retarded youtube arugments your in chump lol
it sounds like it's you who's missed something. anyway, what makes her a racist? why are the demands of access to the american promise considered racist in your estimation?
who the hell said every white person was racist? are you insane? i said that every american has a right TO the american dream & that laws must be made to protect that right. wtf are YOU talking about?
funny. sotomayor is puerto rican. la raza is primarily a mexi-chicano thing. what's more, la raza is a community outreach group not some clandestine organization that's out to topple the country. get real.
So turkey boy, I'd advise you take your dramatic, hand-wringing gestures of disbelief and stuff them. Every video you put out demonstrates a frightening lack of ability to comprehend what it is people are actually saying. Consequently, you live in the land of the straw man and make a complete ass out of yourself on a regular basis.
Of course, the most amazing thing out of all this is that some people actually like you. How freaking depressing is that...
The ad wasn't trying to establish a connection between Ayers and Sotomayor, you hopeless imbecile. It was drawing a parallel between the two. You know, as in a second time that Obama has close political ties with someone who can be accused of supporting terrorist activities, however tangentially. The charge is weak in Sotomayor's case, but still, such a connection does in fact exist. It's laid out in a NYTimes article if anyone would like to become informed, unlike turkey tool here.
Its laid out in a NY times article by bill crystol u know the editor for the weekly standard. It is really sad that right wing has nothing left to offer other than mcartheism.Look it up. The idea that obama and ayres ayres are buddies that hang out and talk politics is absoulutly false. Are we really at a point where knowing somone in any way no matter how loosly makes you responsible for somone else's avtions and words.
Wrong. It was laid out in an article (or blog post) by a guy named Charlie Savage. Go the the NYTimes website and search "Sotomayor terrorist".
Ayers raised funds for Obama and helped kick-start his political career, and their paths crossed on a number of occasions over the years. It's not unreasonable to have problems with the U.S. president having political ties, or any relationship for that matter, with a scumbag like Ayers.
Sonia Sotomayor a very wise latina !! paque tu lo sepa! (if you didnt understand the last sentence do the research )
richie2910 1 week ago
Racism duhh!
moonlitxstare 1 month ago
People need to get over the Bill Ayers crap. Bill Ayers is not a socialist, he's a run of the mill liberal.
ElNuevoChe93 8 months ago
Hay gente bien estupida en USA. Sobre todo los republicanos. Hipocritas, dobre moral, doble cara. America latina nunca le ha hecho danio a USA
Evenor48 1 year ago
republicans beld better though, so something is working for them.
KangaKucha 1 year ago
Conservatives can suck horse dick..
mrsrachealbaker 1 year ago
Comment removed
mrsrachealbaker 1 year ago
dude your goberment are the terrorist. Sure she havent done anything and still call her a terrorist. ... But your country kill 1000nds of children and people but no they are not terrorist cause they have bombs with a llitle thing called democracy... well ill call it semi-democracy... so really think about it and tell me who is the real terrorist..... google it
VicK777v7 2 years ago
I am connected to Hitler, Bin Laden Paul Pot, Mau, Muslolini and Stalin.
JerezJulio 2 years ago
your the devil lol
bmvangieson 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i dont know about sotomayer and it doesnt matter now bc this things already over but does anybody else care that our president is friends with a terrorist. some people are so stupid. way to go liberals. hey next time lets all vote for osama binladin
bmvangieson 2 years ago
how come you didnt say this when bush was hanging out with the saudi prince holding hands he is more of a terrorist than ayers stfu
Adagio2424 2 years ago
im not a fan of bush either. i dont support what he did then and i dont agree with obama's relationship with bill either.
bmvangieson 2 years ago
So, this is worse than the shameless things that liberals, including TYT, say about Sarah Palin?
Is Cenk aware of the concept of a double-standard?
Monawanaha 2 years ago
How about come up with proof that she sponsored terrorists? Address that please. And name one shameless thing said about Palin. It´s impossible NOT to make fun of what she says. What double standard? You´re comparing Sotomayor to Palin? Even conservatives cringe when she says stupid things like department of law. Stick to the facts. No one would ever call Palin a terrorist. You´re not aware of the concept of double standard because you don´t know what it means.
oalemdemadrid 2 years ago
TYT and other Palin-haters generally don't care about what she actually did. They just focus all their derision on her verbal mistakes, usually in a juvenille namecalling fashion. These "conservatives" called Sotomayor a terrorist because of things she said. TYT is the pot calling the kettle black.
Perhaps Palin is a poor speaker, but she was an incredibly effective leader. Basically she's the direct opposite of obama. Strange that some people prefer great speeches over actual results.
Monawanaha 2 years ago
What exactly did she say that was terrorist? Maybe she did but I haven´t found that. All the google searches I did only debunked the story. Yes, it´s what Palin did to my state that I don´t like. Even though policy IS words, forget she said humans and dinosaurs lived together. She charged women for their own rape kits and used my money to sue the EPA to take polar bears off the endangered species list. Huge waste of money.
oalemdemadrid 2 years ago
I'm afraid you've been misinformed, like all Palin-haters. The Wasilla police dept. had been charging for rape examination kits long before Palin was mayor. As soon as she learned of it, she instituted a statewide ban on the practice.
Concerning lawsuits, democrats wasted hundreds of thousands of tax-dollars on frivolous FOIA charges against Palin. She was never found guilty, but the court costs caused the first state deficit since Palin became governor, so she resigned to end this waste.
Monawanaha 2 years ago
Are from AK? I am. The way I understand it, She fired the police chief and then installed the police chief who instituted this practice. She is definitely NOT the one who stopped it. It was definitely Eric Croft who introduced state legislation to stop it. It couldn´t possibly have been Palin because the mayor of Wasilla DOESN¨T introduce state legislation. Branchflower, in the investigation, found she DID violate ethics rules in troopergate. You didn´t address my other points at all.
oalemdemadrid 2 years ago
I find it sad that even Alaska residents are so misinformed about Palin. Once again, the practice existed long before she was mayor. It was not brought to the public's attention until years later when she was governor. Croft introduced the bill that banned it, and Palin approved it.
Also, she was NOT GUILTY in troopergate. The judge ruled that the governor has the right to fire her direct employees for any reason or no reason at all, just like employers at a real job. What source are you using?
Monawanaha 2 years ago
Mona what source am I using? Google it yourself, I´m tired of spoon feeding you. Oh, very comforting, she has a right to have no reason at all. So do you.
No reason at all like Obama wants to kill my baby and dinosaurs and people lived together. If you think she´s a genius then I give up.
oalemdemadrid 2 years ago
Obama fired all of Bush's cabinet members when he became president, is he corrupt for doing the exact same thing Palin did? If you work directly for someone and you refuse to cooperate, why should they NOT fire you?
TYT has already over-covered all of Palin's speech blunders, it's basically all they do. She is bad at speeches, but her actual RESULTS as governor are nothing short of amazing. She is the opposite of obama, who has nothing but amazing speeches. Genius or not, she is more effective.
Monawanaha 2 years ago
every post you have made is b.s why dont you look at facts and stop pulling shit out of your ass
Adagio2424 2 years ago
her actions in the way she handle the trooper incident was unethical the investigators said she behaved in an unethical way why dont you look up the report
Adagio2424 2 years ago
what has she done that is good um yeah nothing
Adagio2424 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck WHITE PEOPLE
gangzta0papi 2 years ago
I can't wait for her biography
"Life as a Fat Mexican Justice"
mstaff657 2 years ago
u mean "Life as a Fat P.Rican justice"hahaha.
RollingClown 2 years ago
yes what a pathetic time to live in the U.S.
mstaff657 2 years ago
ahhh ur so racist ur more then likely a redneck
punch2o 2 years ago
even if I was who cares?
tell ya what - I'll kiss Palin's muddy boot
if you can kiss that disgusting fat pig justice Sonia on the lips
I would not mind the Liberals so much if they weren't so damn ugly. I have seen some ugly humans before but these liberals make me puke.
mstaff657 2 years ago
Please note, he said this wasn't Republicans, he said it was a conservative activist group that I've never even heard of.
rtg593 2 years ago
conservatives go to hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YLEANA923 2 years ago 2
I'd rather not, but thank you anyway:p
rtg593 2 years ago
Crazy republicans no cry
hahahahahahahahahahaha......
YLEANA923 2 years ago 3
BRAVO SONIA SOTOMAYOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!
Sonia Sotomayor the first PUERTORRICAN Judge in the USA supreme court
From PUERTO RICO,U.S.A.
PUERTO RICO the next state of U.S.A.
YLEANA923 2 years ago
JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA WEEEEEE!!!!!! JAJAJA exactamentee!!!! uuuuuuugh yo ODIO cmo los gringos hablan el espanish!! no pueden decil soTomayor? tan difisil es? DIOS MIO!!! na na pero tas pasa/pasao!! conservatives o to hell jajaja q funny! =]
0xLATINAxPRIDEx0 2 years ago
im sorry but i am Puerto Rican and that to me is an insult
holydarkness90 2 years ago
I don't think she was with the people that took over the Congress with guns. This did not make sense.
yak6ex 2 years ago
Ugh enough with bill ayers.
floeticdeath 2 years ago 2
This is bad, even for consevatives.
jdnum2 2 years ago 3
So Obama freind is Ayers, what the phuk is the diference.
Theyrcomin4u 2 years ago
how can they say that and get away with it -isnt it slander
TheFruitinater 2 years ago
because she really is a terrorist.
RoyalDemonforChrist 2 years ago
i know you wont answer but how is she a terrorist-do you know what a terrorist is? if anyones a terrorist its george bush and the clowns that voted for him
TheFruitinater 2 years ago 15
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what about terrorist obama? yes i know what a terrorist is. according to homeland security a terrorist is anyone who disagrees with federal authority.
RoyalDemonforChrist 2 years ago
At least he did a few positive things for this country. If I'd been holding my breath waiting for obama to do something anywhere near the direction considered positive, I'd have died of anoxia long ago... I just hope this country can survive the next few years until we can get someone in here that actually believes in the American way of life.
rtg593 2 years ago
Tell me, what's the "American way of life"?
juarezrt 2 years ago
Accusing one of being affiliated with terrorists seems to be our generation's Red Scare or Salem Witch Trials.
ndoublea05 2 years ago 8
hahaha nice
levimon 2 years ago
Let the repubs keep bringing up all this SOS they did in the general election as all it will do is backfire on them again and make them as extink as the dinosours as rats always jump a sinking ship.
derail14 2 years ago
I'm glad that you point out how logic prevails on this issue. There is no way any one can make any connection with Sonia and support of violent crimes. Cenk you make a good balance here. Good work.
StevoArtist 2 years ago
And a Certification of Live Birth isn't a real birth certificate... yeah, that's the ticket!
And the Democrats based their healthcare plan on Mein Kampf because they are socialists... yeah, that's the ticket!
And gay people can't get married because the Mormons are experts on traditional marriage... yeah, that's the ticket!
And big business will give your job to China ONLY IF you make them pay taxes... yeah, that's the ticket!
informatist 2 years ago
Lmao Mein Kampf Hitler was not a socialist. He was a fascist. If you have studied fascism and the rise of fascism of the Weimar Republic, you would see that they are anti communist. Fascism is a totalitarian, militaristic regime. They are not National Socialists such as the USSR. National Socialists such as the USSR were executed and sent to death camps all over Europe.Having social aspects to your government doesnt make you socialist.France=social aspects to government but is not socialist.
lunargoddess2002 2 years ago 3
What's the difference between Conservatives and Republicans?
MarduktheRedDragon18 2 years ago 2
Some democrats are conservatives.
LODGE4444 2 years ago
Now I'm really confused because I always had the understanding that conservatives were republicans and liberals were democrats. What are the ideas that makes all of them differ?
MarduktheRedDragon18 2 years ago
Basically party agenda. JFK was pretty conservative and in 1976 Jimmy Carter was considered conservative. Rudy Guiliani is pretty liberal for a republican, as is John Mccain. Conservative republicans hated his nomination in 2008. Liberal republicans are called RINO's by conservative republicans- republican in name only.
LODGE4444 2 years ago
So even though Obama's a democrat do you concider him to be conservative?
MarduktheRedDragon18 2 years ago
real terrorists use terrorism as a way to kill or make certain people bad.
polos505 2 years ago
You want to know why they make commericals like that? Most of the population are zombie sheep due to all the medication they take, the toxins in the air, fluoride and chemicals in the water, and their unused brain cells due to overload of television. Thus they are easily brainwashed.
seanlaca 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHA are we supposed to take that commercial serious?
SoxAvs 2 years ago 2
that commercial was awesome, lol ...
ukendcx2000 2 years ago
no no she is not, the one who is connected is Hillarly Clinton who in order to get votes convinced her husband to commute the sentences of several terrorist from that territory
tico8007 2 years ago
Man, I`m telling you.
WHITE PEOPLE ARE AFRAID OF LATINOS. `cause we RUN THIS SHIT. Now that we have a black president , whites are hidden from their homes.
MUAHAHAHA Oh wait, my bad - they always hide from REAL PEOPLE.
gangzta0papi 2 years ago
Idiota tu nombre es gangsta papi no se por que para algunos de los latinos de Estados Unidos se asocian con esos estereotipos de ser gangster y una malas persona yo e viajado a los Estados Unidos muchas veses y nunca e sido victima de racismo ni nada de eso eres un racista ignorate que odia a la jente blaca por que piensas que ellos tienen la culpa de todas cosas malas que te pasan te deberias abochornar tus padre viajaron a los Estados Unidos a buscar un buen futuro y tu lo desperdicias
punkduderock 2 years ago
DOn`t use GOOGLE TRANSLATOR.
Now, fumate una pinga y no jodas.
gangzta0papi 2 years ago
"Committee for Justice"? Why not just go all out, and call themselves the New Committee for Public Safety? I'm sure that Herr Buchanan would be happy to oversee it.
Fred13B 2 years ago
Fear politics. The only strategy Republicans have had for the past 30 years. And you working class nitwits living paycheck to paycheck eat it up.
Vote more out of fear of THE OTHER. Meanwhile, Republicans vote for every measure that insures your jobs go elsewhere; that insures unions become weaker; that insures the middle class will continue to dwindle; that insures you will become beholden to corporate interests.
Keep voting for the fear, nitwits. You deserve the Republican ass-fucking.
bapyou 2 years ago
Repubs are screwed either way.
When you make your core principles and ideals based on a minority of the population it can only last for so long.
Until the republican party changes what they stand for they are in a losing stalemate if there is such a thing.
azteckike 2 years ago
Please go into specifics. Don't hold back. To which "cores and ideals based on a minority of the population" do you refer? Explain.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
Anyway, now that the liberals changed the playing field, now the GOP can feel free to nominate guys who have said that Mexicans are a bunch of spics, and get away with it. Not too bad...I guess the GOP gets something good out of this after all.
Leave it to the liberals to further retard the race issue and keep it festering.
calimar28 2 years ago
As well as being a racist and terrorist, Sotomayor has also been proven to be a sexist, supremacist, marxist, communist, hypnotist and a dentist.
Its all fact...look it up on the internet.
VTC67 2 years ago
In addition to being a terrorist, Sotomayor is dentist? Impressive.
bapyou 2 years ago
Constervatisves need to RT FM
9ORGAZMO6 2 years ago
Shes a racist. And she'll get confirmed. But now you liberals changed the playing field...and when a GOP judge goes for confirmation and it turns out he said something about hispanics and blacks...you liberals cannot utter a word! We will just say "Sotomayor got a pass...shouldnt Imus too?"
You liberals are all about double standard. You'll lose in 2010. Your too full of yourselves, and it will bite you, trust me.
calimar28 2 years ago
Every Republican on the board was racist. They didn't even hide it that well... A bunch of white guys scared ot a little women... Why don't they just og cheet on their wives like all the other republicans..
usapegasus007 2 years ago 3
Behold the brilliance, the moral superiority of the liberal mind.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
the moral superiority??? You don't have to be smart to be a liberal, you just AGREE with everybody. No thinking process involved!
karibellflame 2 years ago
whatever happened to slander
Justwosweet 2 years ago
They're going after Sotomayor and her affiliation with La Raza. The group La Raza itself is more of a community based PAC for good, but the committee for justice is trying to tie a puerto rican direct action group to her because this group allegedly received funding from La Raza.
If you thought the Bill Ayers connection was thin. This makes a spiderweb strand look like one of the golden gate bridge cables.
scbluesman13 2 years ago
Wrong. This is about the PRLDEF issue I described. Know your facts before talking about how "thin" their case is.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
Basically, you represent exactly what he republican party is now: a stale brand about to be pulled off the shelves, who thinks everyone but them is a communist and terrorist. What does the GOP even stand for anymore? Family values, amidst affair after affair among its leadership? National security, after we have created the conditions for hundreds of new terrorists? Meritocracy, when you produce anti-intellectual morons like Palin? Good luck with your old can of GOP. We are moving on.
Sonnera 2 years ago 2
When I see a list of stupidity like this, I really am baffled. Rather than your infantile, tired, simplistic drivel about "what you republicans stand for", why are you so incapable of sticking to the discrete issues that are mentioned? See a pattern here, brainless? As soon as people mention very specific issues they have with Obama, you hopeless fucktards trot out your generic indictments of all things republican.
Not exactly responsive to the issues raised, twit.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
I have no obligation to stick to the issues mentioned. You are not informed enough about the issues to have a substantive debate. I am not even generalizing the behavior of republicans. The fact remains that the Republican brand is polling terribly with the American people, yet none of you wants to analyze where you might be going wrong. Your incessant prattle about democratic candidates being terrorists and communists so worn out.
Sonnera 2 years ago
The GOP is polling bad (better latley tho) with the American people, because Bush got us into a war we needed not to be in, and the republican congress rubber stamped it...thats why Americans turned away from the GOP...that plus Bush (and the dems) were terrible for the economy and spent to much. Otherwise America is center-right...but they have no one to vote for.
calimar28 2 years ago
Hah, too funny. You've mentioned the republican "brand" a few times now. You are EXACTLY the type of imbecile I was commenting on over drinks with friends the other day. Someone who buys into the Obama PR machine and the whole PR driven approach to his presidency. It's a sad, sad spectacle, and a sad indication of the state of politics in general.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
And I dont even know what comments you are referring to or what the context is. Half the time I am debating egotistical people like you throwing out a bunch of fallacious stats about black on white crimes rates or more traditional racist comments about black people being generally lazy and misbehaved. I don't let these people off the hook, but people like you are not important enough for me to hate. Like I said, you are incapable of forming arguments. FYI, Your comment said what Obama "did".
Sonnera 2 years ago
The Repugs have transformed themselves into nothing more than a very sick bigoted cult now. And Everyone, anyone with a sane mind, can see this manifestation of vindictive desperation clear as crystal! When all else fails ....make up somethin'...anything...any ol' garbage... so long as it's a smear!
No wonder the GOP's found itself in No-Man's Land! And, judging by their behaviour, it seems they want to remain there! Repugnant!
witchwild 2 years ago
I love the way America is so scared of terrorism now, yet they will become terrorists when it suits them. Just ask the Native Americans of that
DaReal2k9 2 years ago 3
If cheesy means "tells the truth in an unconventional way" I would say you were correct.
cupprz 2 years ago
What the fuck is up with the republican party constantly screaming " Terrorist! " or " Communist! "?
Don't they realize that their fear tactics don't work any more? Just keep using the same tactics that lost you the last election republicans, Obama will enjoy his second term
ViciousRanger 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this show is soo cheesy
Peanutslayer2 2 years ago
that's NOT the fucking point.
anaangel92 2 years ago
...is suddenly deemed "outrageous".
Give me a break. The hypocrisy is stunning.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
And further more, I don't even really give a damn about Bush and the Saudis. Terrorist is an extreme that needs to be applied to actual terrorists. La Raza is not a terrorist group, does really have anything in there statements, record, or history to justify that term, and nor does Sotomayer. The republicans continue to suffer from brain damage, and wnt seek medical help because they are equitable health care too. Everyone is just laughing at this point. It over, you ALL lose. Goodbye.
Sonnera 2 years ago 2
"...Republicans wont seek medical attention because they are against equitable health care too."
Sonnera 2 years ago
Good God, the point of the ad was not to "connect" Sotomayor to Bill Ayers, as in claim a relationship between the two. Is this moron really that thick? The point is that for a second time, we're seeing Obama politically connected to someone who can be tied to terrorist sympathizers, however tangential the relationship. Not a strong case as for Sotomayor, but the connection definitely exists.
Politicians always have and always will be judged by the company they keep. Interesting that this...
drzhivagho 2 years ago
Nobody is saying the ad is trying to connect them in a relationship. The ad is trying to compare the two in a ludicrous fashion, as in Obama has pick "another" one of these radical people. The shit didn't work before, has no relevance to Sotomayor's record or qualifications, or her completely uncontroversial background. Yeah, everyone is a terrorist sympathizer to republicans. But Bush's family ties to the Saudis and their investment in Bush family companies is a-ok. Fuck all you morons.
Sonnera 2 years ago
And don't forget Bush's really warm ties to the bin Laden family...who were swiftly flown out of the US at Bush's order minutes after the planes hit the WTC!
The GOP is a dying breed gasping for air with each vindictive dying breath it takes.
witchwild 2 years ago
This stuff is irrelevant anyway. The cap and trade and healthcare disasters that loom on the horizon will seal Obama's fate - a one-term president who did more in four years to destroy this country than any prez. in history. With a major, whopping assist from the likes of that wretched human being Nancy Pelosi.
Listen, you imbeciles are free to lap up the bromides and platitudes that fill his daily speeches. By all means, encourage his narcissism. See where it gets you...and all of us.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
You literally have to be a complete moron to believe Obama, who has been in office for a little over 5 months, is responsible for a health care crisis that has been emerging for the last 40 years due to poor cost control and over-utilization. The economy was and is going down the tubes due to the banking, lending, and rating industries, all of which started to go bad in 2006 and 2007, when YOUR boy was in office. Obama has started no wars and has initiated no scandals. Bush is the one you meant.
Sonnera 2 years ago
The issue is not who "caused" the healthcare mess. Surprise, surprise - another straw man offered up by an uninformed nimrod. In any event, the issue is that the so-called solution about to be rammed through congress is an absolute disaster, which will accomplish NOTHING beyond transferring healthcare costs to the wealthy and small businesses. Not good policy anytime, let alone in the midst of a recession.
You and I are on different planes, friend. Your level of understanding is laughable.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
For once I agree. We Are on different levels of understanding policy. You can barely articulate a cogent argument, and think 5 months of a presidency can account for years of policy failure and circumstance throughout multiple presidencies. Go to hell. I get so tired of debating morons like you.
Sonnera 2 years ago 2
My comments regarding the healthcare and cap and trade proposals of Obama etal. are, by definition, forward looking. I'm referring to the grave damage that WILL be done if and when they are passed. Yet you insist on claiming that my beef is that Obama hasn't already solved these problems. Obviously, that in no way follows from what I've actually said, stop embarrassing yourself. You are either scrupulously dishonest or even less intelligent than I suspected. And that's saying something.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
So your upset with Obama on based on what you believe his policies WILL accomplish, which will take years to see the result of. Hahaha. Debate on the externalities and consequences of policies is one thing. People like you, with magically intuition about this policy feels bad, are exactly the kind of people that don't need to be pontificating on policy at all. My comment was how your perception on what the policy will do is incorrect, based on what the bill says. Your the one off topic.
Sonnera 2 years ago
You ignorant college kids are comical. So much piss and vinegar, but so little common sense. Regarding healthcare, the numbers are out. Do you live in a cave? As it turns out, this so-called "reform" will do nothing more than 1) create a massive bureaucracy (that draws its share from the public teet) and 2) transfer wealth, an Obama theme. You ignorant, emotional college kids think such things happen without cost. That's because you' lack wisdom as to how the world works...
drzhivagho 2 years ago
Shut the fuck up you ignorant peasant.
nilbud 2 years ago
You see no significance that, despite the fact that the top 20% of earners pay 86% of the nation's income taxes, more than ever, the narrative has been crafted whereby the rich "aren't paying their share". Words like "freedom" and "fairness" are bandied about, without a moment's consideration of what happens in a society where a majority of people have no stake in government fiscal decisions and are in a position to essentially confiscate money from the wealthy, as needed.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
Yes, I can see why your jealous of college kids like me, who can actually read and converse on a topic without spouting meaningless platitudes about what someone thinks Obama might do in the future. I am sorry you feel left out. Certainly the consensus on this page is that your a moron. Take your chatter elsewhere. I believe I already mentioned I am done with you. I have real work to do now. Have a nice day.
Sonnera 2 years ago
About what someone "thinks Obama might do in the future"? Are you really that dim? Obama's already doing it, brainless, He has been since the moment he became president. And his next installments - cap and trade and healthcare - will be his most harmful yet.
BUT, even the worst policies take time to do their harm. The damage will be done over a period of years, not immediately, moron.
In a nut shell, his decisions today are charting a course for disaster tomorrow.
Get the timing yet, jr?
drzhivagho 2 years ago
"Certainly the consensus on this page is that your a moron."
Here's a homework assignment, junior. Name the logical fallacy you just employed (to comical effect, i might add).
Then stop embarrassing yourself.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
If your talking about the fallacy relating to the fact that a consensus does not make something true, that need not apply to speaking about someone's personal attributes. If lots of people think your a moron, whether you are or not, is irrelevant. Your social position and ability to influence people is non-existent. This applies to you, moron.
Sonnera 2 years ago
My "social position and ability to influence people is non-existent"? Because a handful of foaming at the mouth, ignorant fucktards on youtube dislike me? That's one of the dumbest things i've ever read.
For chrissake, junior. Stop embarrassing yourself.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am not obsessed with race, but the fact that you think you can live beyond race and doesn't have to consider its continuing political and social implications reveals you as the ignorant asshole you appear to be. Race is still salient in the lives of EVERYONE, including white people in this country whom believe that they are somehow beyond race or that their daily experience is not reflected in some part by their race and peoples reaction to their race. These are conversations grown-ups have.
Sonnera 2 years ago
Grammar lesson, "did" is past tense, yet you claim what obama did in 4 years has destroyed the country, when he actually hasn't done anything except a few executive orders, and did nothing to destroy the country. Were are in the situation we are in because of years of past policy failure , which was my point. So, your prediction that Obama will destroy the future because of what he might do is dumb. Stop talking to me. I have only responded to you on principle to point out your douchbaggery.
Sonnera 2 years ago
Here is my exact quote, half wit:
"The cap and trade and healthcare disasters that loom on the horizon will seal Obama's fate - a one-term president who did more in four years to destroy this country than any prez."
It's clear that I'm referring to his legacy - what it ill be at the end of his destructive, one term presidency. Your interpretation - that I'm referring to the PAST four years (2005-2009?) - is positively retarded. Stop embarrassing yourself. Delete that comment if you can.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
Ah, upon further review of some of your comments I see that you are entirely obsessed with race. Every word you read, every point you analyze is filtered through your bizarre racial prism. It's amazing that people like you can't grasp how offensive you are to us reasonable folks. One needn't be a shrink to see that your racial animus is fueled by an all consuming bitterness/hatred. Watching you self-righteously project this onto others is comical. Dim, hypocritical stuff, moron.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
I think the "wise Latino woman" is the one obsessed about race. No, you wont admit it, even though she said it 8 times, of course you wont see that she is a racist.
calimar28 2 years ago
I am not obsessed with race, but the fact that you think you can live beyond race and doesn't have to consider its continuing political and social implications reveals you as the ignorant asshole you appear to be. Race is still salient in the lives of EVERYONE, including white people in this country whom believe that they are somehow beyond race or that their daily experience is not reflected in some part by their race and peoples reaction to their race. These are conversations grown-ups have.
Sonnera 2 years ago
No, apparently those are conversations had by self-righteous college students of below average intelligence.
It's funny that you can't see the vapidity of your tripe. Oh to be young, lol.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
ok then. THENHOW IS SHE CONNECTED TO TERRORISTS?!?!?!
grendelee 2 years ago 4
- In 1954, several armed Puerto Rican separatists stormed the U.S. House of Reps., the gunfire wounding 5 congressmen. - In 1990, when thre was talk of the 3 separatists appearing alongside Nelson Mandela, who was making an appearance in NYC, then Mayor David Dinkins slammed them and said they had no business appearing with Mandela, or comparing their plight to his. - The President of the PRLDEF, of which Sotomayor was a Board member, issued a statement defending the men, saying: (cont'd)
drzhivagho 2 years ago
Wow, thats about the stupidest connection anyone has tried to come up with. She is a board member (board members do not run organizations by the way, they are more like legal and financial oversight) of PRLDE, a group that didn't do anything, but its president (whom can issue any statement he wants, on his behalf and no one else's) issued a statement about what "many people" might believe. HAHAHAHAHAAHA.
Sonnera 2 years ago 2
I've alrady stated that I view the Sotomayor/Terrorist supporter connection as a weak one. But it exists, and it would have been nice if, say, she had resigned her board position in protest of the org's president supporting such criminals. It's called moral fiber, or moral courage, or character, or any one of those. A foreign concept to the likes of you, but still important to some people...
drzhivagho 2 years ago
(cont'd) "He doesnt recognize that to many people in Puerto Rico, these are fighters for freedom and justice, for liberation, just as is Nelson Mandela, who himself advocated bearing arms. - clearly the link to Sotomayor is tenuous, but it certainly exists. The fact that the President of the PRLDEF, an organization in which Sotomayor held a position of leadership, defended these men using words like "freedom fighters" is a legit issue. Like it or not.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
But..b...he's black....which equates to awesome
matthrms 2 years ago
thats laughable. how many other judges and politicians have used the words "freedom fighters"
grendelee 2 years ago
In reference to separatists who armed themselves and attacked the U.S. House of Representatives? Not many who were interested in still having acareer. And the obvious point here is that we're talking about the POTUS and a potential Supreme Court justice. Normal standards don't apply, for obvious reasons (one would think).
drzhivagho 2 years ago
conseratives are so retarded they' d try to connect CLINTON to terrorism. Just ignore them and push them aside so REAL people can get real work done.
linux750 2 years ago
Okay, now I've heard everything! If Sotomayor isn't in jail by now, I guess that explains why we never found Bin Laden ...
afrosaxxon 2 years ago
Terrorist? isn't that a popular word used these days?....Ridiculous
Ibis999 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chenk, Don't you realize that all these right wing nut jobs consider anyone, that DOES NOT believe as they do, a terrorist. The majority of the people in this country are terrorist because we voted for Obama.
wtfoof 2 years ago
Comment removed
wtfoof 2 years ago
Comment removed
wtfoof 2 years ago
Every time a conservative brings up Bill Ayers, it makes me laugh. How hard I laugh is directly correlated to how long ago the election was.
kalfjak 2 years ago
I'm middle eastern, so they can connect me to anything lol.
mites7 2 years ago
I'm wight, so they can connect me to any racist group.
Also I was born in San Fransisco, so they can throw the gay card out as well.
DiceWarwick 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
YOUTUBE ADMINISTRATORS are controling the freedom of expression. They are part f the BNP in England and they do not allow anyone to express anything that might go against the participation of this party in this Forum. This is a shame as it only proves hipocrisy........
nalu02 2 years ago
uh youtube is private. they reserve the right.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
every one that disagrees with the dems is raise st.disagree with Republican tarrorist . both are made to make you cowtow. make you give up. its cheap an on American. see how it w rooks.
SunSin1000 2 years ago
If thats the case why dont sean hannity and limbaugh do some hard hitting reporting on jack abremoff and his connection to the republican party or better yet ronald regan chenny and rumsfelds relationship with suddam hussein
chrisgalizia 2 years ago
Sotomayor is a known racist, she should have never made it this far.
buttlord123 2 years ago
She is only a know racist to people who listen to right wing pundidts and cant think for themselves
chrisgalizia 2 years ago
No shes a known racist to people who look at the evidence....facts......what you just is regurgitated is left wing crap.
buttlord123 2 years ago
Can you link to the facts? Seriously, I'm interested.
mites7 2 years ago
so having faced more than 90 cases of discrimination & ruled against almost 80 of those makes her a racist? how the fuck is that a fact? supposing that she's "known as a racist to people" is NOT a fucking fact. that's called anecdotal evidence. since you're calling her a racist, how do you explain her ruling against the presented discrimination cases almost 80% of the time? is she a part time racist? if so, where are your "facts"; where is your "evidence"?
upabittoolate 2 years ago
stfu shes has to be fair and do her job to move up into a position of power to be in the Supreme court.....Have you ever heard of La Raza? people will say all kinds of shit but, their goals are racist, period...Look into it, and dont turn the other cheek....Its all about the domination and the advancement of the latino/hispanic race.....Lets say if I was part of a organization for the advancement of the White race or white pride, do think I would be allowed to even be a judge at all?....NO.
buttlord123 2 years ago
here's a better idea. YOU STFU.
yes. i've heard of la raza. i read that paper whenever i have a chance. nevertheless, the fact that she ruled AGAINST 79% of the discrimination cases presented to her is sufficient evidence to anyone that can rub together 2 brains cells.
also, la raza is not about domination. it's about advancement. there's nothing wrong with that.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
"people will say all kinds of shit but their goals are racist period". i love the way you reason. it takes no logic at all.
here's the deal. if a race identified group is in a state of decline; better yet, if most of the people in a race identified group are in a vulnerable position, is it not intuitive for them to figure out ways to help themselves thereby ADVANCING themselves? am i not responsible, as a member of the village, for helping my neighbor? la raza is help from neighbors.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
as a black nationalist, my primary concern is about making sure that black people get access to the american promise. why? because the majority has been denied access. it doesn't make me any kind of racist. it just means that my life's work is mainly about the health, education, material resource & overall wellbeing of my immediate community. does that mean i have distaste for the rest of humanity? of course not. it means that my people need my help the most. same goes for la raza.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
lol fuck off.
buttlord123 2 years ago
pwned
upabittoolate 2 years ago
no, your a rambling retard who thinks hes smart......thats all.
buttlord123 2 years ago
Your last comment had nothing to do with the argument.. You were just kissing your own ass trying to sound intelligent lol.....Im a black nationalist blah blah wtf? stay on topic..
buttlord123 2 years ago
my black nationalist analogy was to show oyu the difference between a racist, segregationalist ideology versus being pro-national. if you can't get your head around that, it's your own shortcoming. just don't go around accusing someone of racism. in truth, i invited you to a reasonable discussion. but because you didn't agree, you shut down. that's what most people, who can't think, do. you fail.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
the very fact that you can't accept me as a intelligent person & that i must "try to sound intelligent" speaks volumes for your own level of racism. like most neo-cons, you project. nothing is your own fault. you get uncomfortable when other race identified groups fight for their own piece of the american pie. NEWSFLASH: it's our country too.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
Snap out of your ridiculous fantasy that every white person is racist and out to stop minorities from enjoying the American dream.....NEWSFLASH: Just remember what language your speaking and who created the American dream for everyone..
buttlord123 2 years ago
If you want to call me a racist for pointing a ACTUAL racist, lol then that says loads about YOUR logic........but thats the classic move for any moron
buttlord123 2 years ago
incidentally, i called the other person racist for using the n-word. try to keep up
upabittoolate 2 years ago
once again you bring up shit that wasn't even mentioned in our conversation....You need to keep up with all the retarded youtube arugments your in chump lol
buttlord123 2 years ago
it sounds like it's you who's missed something. anyway, what makes her a racist? why are the demands of access to the american promise considered racist in your estimation?
chump
upabittoolate 2 years ago
geez Ive wasted my time on a retard thats forgotten our conversation....
Estimation? what the fuck....are you talking about? LOL
buttlord123 2 years ago
who the hell said every white person was racist? are you insane? i said that every american has a right TO the american dream & that laws must be made to protect that right. wtf are YOU talking about?
upabittoolate 2 years ago
no. you got pwned.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
Sotomayer is a big wig in La Raza
buttlord123 2 years ago
funny. sotomayor is puerto rican. la raza is primarily a mexi-chicano thing. what's more, la raza is a community outreach group not some clandestine organization that's out to topple the country. get real.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
Oh you conservatives, always playing the race card...
kalfjak 2 years ago
So turkey boy, I'd advise you take your dramatic, hand-wringing gestures of disbelief and stuff them. Every video you put out demonstrates a frightening lack of ability to comprehend what it is people are actually saying. Consequently, you live in the land of the straw man and make a complete ass out of yourself on a regular basis.
Of course, the most amazing thing out of all this is that some people actually like you. How freaking depressing is that...
drzhivagho 2 years ago
lol! drzhivagho YOUR lack of comprehension is the only depressing thing here.
DurkabaJung 2 years ago
Wow, what substance. Impressive.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
The ad wasn't trying to establish a connection between Ayers and Sotomayor, you hopeless imbecile. It was drawing a parallel between the two. You know, as in a second time that Obama has close political ties with someone who can be accused of supporting terrorist activities, however tangentially. The charge is weak in Sotomayor's case, but still, such a connection does in fact exist. It's laid out in a NYTimes article if anyone would like to become informed, unlike turkey tool here.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
Its laid out in a NY times article by bill crystol u know the editor for the weekly standard. It is really sad that right wing has nothing left to offer other than mcartheism.Look it up. The idea that obama and ayres ayres are buddies that hang out and talk politics is absoulutly false. Are we really at a point where knowing somone in any way no matter how loosly makes you responsible for somone else's avtions and words.
chrisgalizia 2 years ago
Wrong. It was laid out in an article (or blog post) by a guy named Charlie Savage. Go the the NYTimes website and search "Sotomayor terrorist".
Ayers raised funds for Obama and helped kick-start his political career, and their paths crossed on a number of occasions over the years. It's not unreasonable to have problems with the U.S. president having political ties, or any relationship for that matter, with a scumbag like Ayers.
drzhivagho 2 years ago