I work at the test cell in Kadena now---this is wild. We don't use this type of engine here anymore, I would crap my pants if this happened when I was running... There are pictures of the piece of the fan disc that got lodged in the run bay wall.
@ForTheFS I think it is, the nozzle sure looks like the one on it's engines. which would be a F100 engine. There's also a F100-229, it has thrust a 2D thrust vectoring nozzle. The F100-229 goes to the F-15 MTD. There is also a F100-PW-229 with 3D thrust vectoring which goes to NASAs F-15 Active.
I know the crew that was running this engine when it happened...the turbine failed and the fire suppession system failed to activate also and this was actually one of the first engines run in the new hush house at kadena..the engine thru blades all over sticking them in the walls and ceiling of the hush house and the good thing is no one was hurt.
At 0:46 you can see the other half of the stator resting underneath the intake and a disk bouncing backward through the test chamber about 4 or so times
Ha I remember this video. It happen at Kadena AB, Okinawa Japan. The enigne is a F100-PW-100. What happen was the 3rd Stage Fan Disk came loose. At that time we had a borescope inspection to look for cracks in the lugs and make sure the weights were still there aswell. The failure happen after the idle leak checks. On the acceleration above idle is when the engine finally failed. The big crittical part that fails in that area were cracks in the 3rd stage lugs, which is the blade root.
One of my teacher told me that they sometimes deliberately snap/weaken the shaft holding the turbine and compressor together. When it does break, the disks would spin out of the engine at max rev and keep spining in the test chamber for a couple of minutes. No wonder when these can spin from 20,000 rpm to 80,000rpm (depending on the size of the engine)
But when a failure happens, every security measures are set in advance to keep control of the situation.
damn!! thats a really terrible thing to happen in a test cell..i have to agree on slickdrake comment about GE taking its engine developemnt and testing seriously since i'am attached to a GE test cell in Malaysia....
in response to the guy about 3 months ago...I work at GE's Test Operation in Southern Ohio..and i work mainly on development/compliance engines...GE does takes its engine development and the testing of development engines very seriously.
there could be a number of things wrong, such as force overpowering the side of the engine, blades can be off, ignition failing, wrong pipe for fuel = in most cases = the way these engines are set up is to with hold at least a slight amount of extreme heat, with cold air flow from head going @ the tail, so you must be care full with variables in between them as such, but in all they really should watch what they are or doing because they step through a wood door, not heavy steel door.
gawd, almost immediately after the nozzle tightened up.... its like it was so soft the pressure change was enough to cause contact... im prolly wrong though..im not an engineer...lol
I would rather Pratt & Whittney and GE et al go ahead and spend their millions to test these engines that have some hapless pilot get killed because some nerdy BEAN COUNTER decided that testing engines "wasted too much money"....
LiOVERLOADil: A minor failure caused a major mishap because of a domino effect. A minor failure of one part led to the domino effect and the end result was a catastrophic destruction of virtually all of the parts.
This happened at the Test Cell on Kadena AB in Okinawa. The cause was a 3rd stage disk failure. I know the guy that was running it...and I worked there.
Because it needs to regulate the air flow between subsonic and supersonic, its complicated but it has to do with bernoully´s priciple and air compresabillity
because the wider it is the power is more spread out but the smaller it is power is more concentred soo more power higher speeds thats basicly controls speed / power..
Nozzles mounted behind the afterburner are used to regulate pressure behind the turbines, allowing the engine to maintain the same mass flow when afterburners are lit. Not to adjust thrust.
The whole point of having an afterburner is to increase mass flow out of the nozzle to increase the thrust. The variable nozzle is used such that the engine outlet pressure is maintained below the turbine inlet pressure. Otherwise, the engine backfires (known as surging).
It appears that an engine surge is the cause behind this engine blowing up.
ok i work on that engine seen in the vid, and the reason the nozzle moves open and closed is to keep the n1 (first 3 stages of compression and last 2 turbine stages) from overspeeding, and also to let out the massive backpressure created when going into augmentor.
Whoa! Someone used the word "augmentor!" I haven't heard that in ages! I was a 2A671A. Don't know what they call the AFSC today. Looks to me like the first stage spacer let go on this one.
augmentors are used on pulse jets to make them more eficient. by mixng cool air with superheated exhaust gasses. the engine in the vid didnot have one. afterburner is probably the word you where after...
Yes and no. Prototype and test engines are ran in a test cell that is essentially closed and armored, however there is ducting for air. Some test cells can even control the amount of air and simulate high-altitude. There are usually also screens to prevent birds and other debris from entering the air ducts. The ducts are also usually designed to reduce the noise. There should be fire suppression built into the test cell, in this case I think it failed to trip.
Yes, this is a one of a kind facility at Kadena AFB japan. Has 4 days that can test 4 seperate 100 or 220 engines at the same time (generally we don't ever have the opportunity but it can be done). Yes, there's screens on top of the building that come down on top and in front of the engine for airflow. This was the second engine blown up in this bay. The first one wasn't recorded and therefor we had to put up cameras in the bays due to the incodent. Also, this is due to the third stage failure.
KUFULEE: That's why dangerous tests should be done in a hardened test cell or at a remote region with people and recording equipment in a bunker.
The tests are done for several reasons: like to get a better idea of how much abuse an engine can take, and as a safety test to evaluate the odds of containment (and analyze the amount of collateral damage).
Sorry I accidentally deleted your post of questions.
just curious how engine makers test how 2 optimize longevity on an engine. like how long should a pilot allow the engine 2 cool after a flight 2 keep the engine in good condition, it seems like that would be a difficult test since u would have to test several engines over a long time. no?
lejink: Actually it is thermal shock/heat expansion in combination with structural loads stressing that can cause most wear and fatigue. Most engines and parts are subjected to tests that simulate 100,000 cycles of start, Max power and heat up, shut down and cool down cycles. It is possible to simulate several years of fatigue fairly accurate in a few weeks or months. It is very expensive but in most cases it is required for US or international aircraft airline and military certification.
lejink: Generally all the prototype components are tested individually with the 100k cycle component tests, then after all the components designs pass the component tests, then they are assembled and tested as assemblies for 100k cycles. The length between cycles is usually determined by temperature and can vary because of mass and environmental factors.
fix it? there was nothing left but the engine shell, lol =P i bet they put the fuel injection for afterburners in the wrong place or it got sucked in the fan or something silly
If you ever spent a night in the doghouse because you suggested your spouse, kids or other family member should go to the hush house; you might be an A&P (aircraft power plant technician or engineer).
(That's my variation of just Foxworthy's redneck jokes)
bodiguy: I'm sure some would agree that it wasn't catastrophic; however there are people that still think the world is flat, the twin towers were destroyed with explosives, the US has extra terrestrial beings and spacecraft at area 51, if you drink cyanide laced Kool-Aid when a comet flies by you can catch a ride on a spacecraft, ect...
bodiguy: If you don't think it was catastrophic, I would like to see you stand next to one inside the cell that blows up like that. If you survive, If you still don't think it's catastrophic, then rebuild the engine within a week without exceeding the cost of the engine, and we'll put it in an airplane and send you up, if it'll even start and get off the ground without blowing up again.
Fan failure, prolly simulated. Those engines rarely, if ever, suffer such catastrophic failure due to at least double-redundant warning and control systems
No DVD-RW's in 1991 and we still use VHS to this day, Recording engine runs is not required so why drop money in up-grading, plus the air force is broke :D
apeppink, How does your comments apply to this jet engine video clip? This is a F-15 PW F100-100 engine exploding on a test stand, because of a 3rd stage fan disk failure. You seem to know a lot about what your talking about, but i dont see what it has to do with this at all... please inform
Related tangent, but not directly with aircraft engines. He had me confused too, but close enough. The Germans were the first I know of to use air intercooled blades or stators as far back as WWII. A cutaway is at WPAFB museum, that shows the cooling system ;).
It was prompted by Kimmer6' comments. He mentioned a GE Frame 3 which is a heavy frame turbine, and things went on from there. I still like aviation though I haven't been involved in it in years. I used to be a C-130 mech/engr. in the Coast Guard in the late '60's.
I was T-56 engine mech in the USMC during the late 80's and 90's. Worked the test cell, also, but never saw anything like this. Worst thing was a catastrophic engine oil leak...all over the golf course at MCAS El Toro. :)
Test cell. Nice! I was standing next to a General Electric frame 3 in Bahrain, heard something funny, dove off the catwalk in slo-mo and hit the trip button on the way down. I hid behind a concrete pillar and it took maybe 20 seconds to go from 7100 rpm to dead stop. The ground shuddered. The casings contained the failure, I almost died of heart failure.
No. On heavy frame (electric power generating) gas turbines. Should've made that clear. Steam cooling is used in combined cycle units (gas turbine/steam turbine) in 1st stage nozzle and blade vanes to accommodate the high firing (combustion) temperatures employed for higher thermal efficiency. The new GE combined cycle units will convert 60% of the input fuel energy into busbar
(electric) power, by far the highest in the world. Even higher if used in cogeneration (waste heat recovery for heating and air conditioning etc.). Next highest are the huge (MAN-B&W, Wartsila-Sulzer) 2 cycle marine diesels used on containerships etc., at ~50%. They too run in combined cycle - turbocharging, turbocompounding, waste heat recovery boiler (for steam turbine, fuel heating, hotel heating/air conditioning load),
jacket water heat recovery (for seawater distillation etc.) shaft driven alternator, etc.
Some plants use light frame (aircraft gas turbines) with no fan (used as gas generators exhausting into power turbines), in special circumstances and on some ships. None are steam cooled that I'm aware of.
Light frame turbines used in power generation, marine propulsion etc. are subject to more severe service in some ways, as they run MCR continuously while aircraft turbines run full power only during takeoff, all the remainder of their service cycle being at part load (except possibly military - sporadically running full power in dogfighting etc.).
It could be but I think it is a mishap. All the blade out tests I have seen have special filming, instrumentation, ect.... From what I see it looks like an everyday test.
The only reason I ask is because I am in the USAF stationed in Okinawa, Japan at Kadena AB. I have worked for 6 years at the location where this motor came apart. This event happened in the early 90s, 1993 if I'm not mistaking. This guy is full of shit, because I have met some of the individuals involved in this accident. And, he was not one of the ones involved. Actually, this was the second engine in this facility that came apart, the first was not recorded.
I was not involved with the mishap, so I don't know; I am connected with the industry however I have not found anyone yet that knows. It's possible they know, but not willing to talk since it is a secretive field, however this happened a long time ago, so I doubt secrecy is an issue anymore, however it is good normal policy to have tight lips.
I do not know, I had been trying to find out the date and location of this incident. It looks like it may have happened in a factory test cell. However it could have happened at an Air Force base, because I got the video from the Air Force. jetmack31 sounds like he might know if he is not joking, but it sounds like he is serious and knows what he is talking about.
No the tech was not me I was recording data next to the run man in the cab. The other tech is the ground observer. This is so we can have a set of eyes on both sides of the engine.
The engine was on the test stand for a trim it was removed from one of the acft. We had just completed an adjustment on the UC (Unified control) and advanced the throttle after the tech left. At that point the mishap occurred. You don't have the entire film posted I know it is hard to come by now as it was taken by the SIB (Safety investigation board)
Let's set the record straight I was present in the control cab when this mishap occurred, second it is as bad as it looks. What you are seeing is the third stage fan disk as a result of a material defect on the third stage fan disk causing mishap. The fire that resulted is from engine oil, what you are not seeing is the fan disk actually spinning around the test bay. What makes this incident so freighting to look back on is our fire suppression system DID NOT FIRE AS IT WAS SUPPOSED TO.
Remember that this is not just a fire it is a loss of the entire fan section most test cell fires people have seen are on commercial aircraft engines not military engines. Past military engine designs were not designed to contain a failure of the entire fan disk Which left the stator case; if you look at the end of the video you can see that there is no fan there just the stator case It is standard practice to not have any tech in the run bay during maintenance runs because of failures like this
I work at the test cell in Kadena now---this is wild. We don't use this type of engine here anymore, I would crap my pants if this happened when I was running... There are pictures of the piece of the fan disc that got lodged in the run bay wall.
Jimih1180 1 year ago 3
is it an f-15's engine?
ForTheFS 1 year ago
@ForTheFS I think it is, the nozzle sure looks like the one on it's engines. which would be a F100 engine. There's also a F100-229, it has thrust a 2D thrust vectoring nozzle. The F100-229 goes to the F-15 MTD. There is also a F100-PW-229 with 3D thrust vectoring which goes to NASAs F-15 Active.
caseygtr 1 year ago
that's wat you call catastrohpic
Remco1901 2 years ago 19
I know the crew that was running this engine when it happened...the turbine failed and the fire suppession system failed to activate also and this was actually one of the first engines run in the new hush house at kadena..the engine thru blades all over sticking them in the walls and ceiling of the hush house and the good thing is no one was hurt.
atvracer111 2 years ago 19
At 0:46 you can see the other half of the stator resting underneath the intake and a disk bouncing backward through the test chamber about 4 or so times
chuppa1chups 2 years ago 5
fod?
proanti1 2 years ago 3
What happened to the bit at the end, it just randomly closed, why?
moviesunrated 2 years ago
Air force hush house! Maybe a 3 level worked on it!!! 8D
Lemurai 2 years ago
I worked for a company in No. Hollywood , CA who overhauled engines, and we had a JT9 break free from the stand during a test! Havoc!
shoveldog81 2 years ago 80
well...that's why the call it a test chamber..
6stringplaya77 2 years ago 10
Ha I remember this video. It happen at Kadena AB, Okinawa Japan. The enigne is a F100-PW-100. What happen was the 3rd Stage Fan Disk came loose. At that time we had a borescope inspection to look for cracks in the lugs and make sure the weights were still there aswell. The failure happen after the idle leak checks. On the acceleration above idle is when the engine finally failed. The big crittical part that fails in that area were cracks in the 3rd stage lugs, which is the blade root.
jozer421 3 years ago 27
One of my teacher told me that they sometimes deliberately snap/weaken the shaft holding the turbine and compressor together. When it does break, the disks would spin out of the engine at max rev and keep spining in the test chamber for a couple of minutes. No wonder when these can spin from 20,000 rpm to 80,000rpm (depending on the size of the engine)
But when a failure happens, every security measures are set in advance to keep control of the situation.
lepape2 3 years ago
yes... looks like it fod'd like a compressor section, n1 or n2 blade came off... the variable exhaust nozzle looks sweet with no covers on it..
racermike3 3 years ago
looks like it could have been shaft bearing failure.
diverguy2583 3 years ago
In response to edalessandro60, do you remeMber if it was the 3rd stage on the HPC or the LPT. What happened to the disk?
alexborrero 3 years ago
damn!! thats a really terrible thing to happen in a test cell..i have to agree on slickdrake comment about GE taking its engine developemnt and testing seriously since i'am attached to a GE test cell in Malaysia....
benjit6 3 years ago
That would just ruin your day!
mra2z 3 years ago
in response to the guy about 3 months ago...I work at GE's Test Operation in Southern Ohio..and i work mainly on development/compliance engines...GE does takes its engine development and the testing of development engines very seriously.
jrod94j 3 years ago
there could be a number of things wrong, such as force overpowering the side of the engine, blades can be off, ignition failing, wrong pipe for fuel = in most cases = the way these engines are set up is to with hold at least a slight amount of extreme heat, with cold air flow from head going @ the tail, so you must be care full with variables in between them as such, but in all they really should watch what they are or doing because they step through a wood door, not heavy steel door.
slickdrake 3 years ago
gawd, almost immediately after the nozzle tightened up.... its like it was so soft the pressure change was enough to cause contact... im prolly wrong though..im not an engineer...lol
racer42O 3 years ago
For some reason I found this REALLY funny! But I am thankful that no one got hurt.
cubedtothex 3 years ago 5
Same here
weeruz 3 years ago
...how far away from the turbine was the camera?
jkobeh 3 years ago
about like 1 or 3 feet
skizzar100 3 years ago
Yowzers, seen alot of em blow. But never like that.
Fitzcard 3 years ago
The explosion was about 17 seconds after the guy closed the door.
Lesson: Never get too confident with this sort of thing.
miniplus 3 years ago 8
I would rather Pratt & Whittney and GE et al go ahead and spend their millions to test these engines that have some hapless pilot get killed because some nerdy BEAN COUNTER decided that testing engines "wasted too much money"....
carry on Gentlemen :-)
terry1919 3 years ago 8
blade off? only thing i could think that would make it explode like that
skatetolive101 3 years ago
This is a minor failure?!
liOVERLOADil 3 years ago 71
LiOVERLOADil: A minor failure caused a major mishap because of a domino effect. A minor failure of one part led to the domino effect and the end result was a catastrophic destruction of virtually all of the parts.
ATFSCrash 3 years ago 40
god..thank god they tested that engine, it would be bloody aweful if they never and went straight on to a new airbus A380..
1ExTERMINATE1 3 years ago 2
this engine is too old for the A380..
leandro89 3 years ago
thats why they cant have squatters living on the airport tarmac lol
hotfuzz459 3 years ago
This happened at the Test Cell on Kadena AB in Okinawa. The cause was a 3rd stage disk failure. I know the guy that was running it...and I worked there.
edalessandro60 3 years ago 2
good to hear from someone who knows what they are talking about
ieatsuka 3 years ago
By current regulations you can only be inside the cell if the engine is running at idle.
So I suspect the guy leaves and they add power and then it explodes.
I doubt the pressere at engine oulet exceeded one at inlet in this case - the nozzle is allmost completely closed.
MarcinP2 3 years ago 2
go at throttle up
sngldad 3 years ago 2
is it suposed to do that?
933922 3 years ago 2
Probably not?
WnBKillaH 3 years ago
LOL
pf126p 3 years ago
its like the test is 4 waiting 4 it to blow
timente3 3 years ago
It just went a bit wrong, you know like a bit bang...... broken, tears shed etc
werf4 3 years ago
Hey, have you seen my line wrench? What?
SSSSHHHBOOOOM!!!! , never mind..
awfargit 3 years ago
can someone explain the variable sized nozzle, why does it need to shrink or expand like that?
ouirdoe 3 years ago
Because it needs to regulate the air flow between subsonic and supersonic, its complicated but it has to do with bernoully´s priciple and air compresabillity
MEGA195 3 years ago 4
because it needs to regulate the air flow between subsonic and supersonic it has to do with bernoulli´s theory and air compressibility
MEGA195 3 years ago 3
to increase and decrease the power by focusing the air flow i think
liamemac 3 years ago
because the wider it is the power is more spread out but the smaller it is power is more concentred soo more power higher speeds thats basicly controls speed / power..
darksoul844 3 years ago
Nozzles mounted behind the afterburner are used to regulate pressure behind the turbines, allowing the engine to maintain the same mass flow when afterburners are lit. Not to adjust thrust.
Kitling89 3 years ago
The whole point of having an afterburner is to increase mass flow out of the nozzle to increase the thrust. The variable nozzle is used such that the engine outlet pressure is maintained below the turbine inlet pressure. Otherwise, the engine backfires (known as surging).
It appears that an engine surge is the cause behind this engine blowing up.
operationcwaI789789 3 years ago
Well, also take into account that the intake is variable too. Aerodynamics change at supersonic speeds and the engine must cope with both conditions.
blackouttsi 3 years ago
ok i work on that engine seen in the vid, and the reason the nozzle moves open and closed is to keep the n1 (first 3 stages of compression and last 2 turbine stages) from overspeeding, and also to let out the massive backpressure created when going into augmentor.
rpaull3 3 years ago
Whoa! Someone used the word "augmentor!" I haven't heard that in ages! I was a 2A671A. Don't know what they call the AFSC today. Looks to me like the first stage spacer let go on this one.
OakRidgeBob 3 years ago
they still call it 2A671A, it was a 3rd stage disk failure
F110mech 3 years ago
augmentors are used on pulse jets to make them more eficient. by mixng cool air with superheated exhaust gasses. the engine in the vid didnot have one. afterburner is probably the word you where after...
themimoth 3 years ago
according to the tech data on this motor PW F100-100 it's called an Augmentor :)
F110mech 3 years ago
And it does mix secondary bypass air "cool air" with exhaust gas air...
F110mech 3 years ago
Compressor quit spinning in less than a second -
thats a lot of spinning momentum to stop -
GroovyVideo2 4 years ago
was that a compressor surge or what?
dhemi1 4 years ago
Oops - back to the ol' drawing board. HA HA!
jtmjtm2001 4 years ago 2
too bad there is no sound
Stormrider444 4 years ago
Compressor failure if I was to take a stab at it
dawson4545 4 years ago
I think this happened around 91 or 92. Disk failure, I remeber the tcto that came out on it. I remember watching this video prior.
mountainthrasher500 4 years ago
im gonna have to agree with blade or disk failure
nach657 4 years ago
jet engine test in a closed room?
sdrfgvrfgvsfravgdsvS 4 years ago
Yes and no. Prototype and test engines are ran in a test cell that is essentially closed and armored, however there is ducting for air. Some test cells can even control the amount of air and simulate high-altitude. There are usually also screens to prevent birds and other debris from entering the air ducts. The ducts are also usually designed to reduce the noise. There should be fire suppression built into the test cell, in this case I think it failed to trip.
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
Yes, this is a one of a kind facility at Kadena AFB japan. Has 4 days that can test 4 seperate 100 or 220 engines at the same time (generally we don't ever have the opportunity but it can be done). Yes, there's screens on top of the building that come down on top and in front of the engine for airflow. This was the second engine blown up in this bay. The first one wasn't recorded and therefor we had to put up cameras in the bays due to the incodent. Also, this is due to the third stage failure.
MacDaddyofEngines 4 years ago
i guess the nozzle was adjusted to the lowest while the fuel was over pumped at the same time forcing it to this reaction
slinks2007 4 years ago
no it's 3rd stage disk failure
jetmech86 4 years ago
id say it speeded up 2 fast kabooom
!
KUFULEE 3 years ago
KUFULEE: That's why dangerous tests should be done in a hardened test cell or at a remote region with people and recording equipment in a bunker.
The tests are done for several reasons: like to get a better idea of how much abuse an engine can take, and as a safety test to evaluate the odds of containment (and analyze the amount of collateral damage).
Sorry I accidentally deleted your post of questions.
ATFSCrash 3 years ago
just curious how engine makers test how 2 optimize longevity on an engine. like how long should a pilot allow the engine 2 cool after a flight 2 keep the engine in good condition, it seems like that would be a difficult test since u would have to test several engines over a long time. no?
lejink 3 years ago
lejink: Actually it is thermal shock/heat expansion in combination with structural loads stressing that can cause most wear and fatigue. Most engines and parts are subjected to tests that simulate 100,000 cycles of start, Max power and heat up, shut down and cool down cycles. It is possible to simulate several years of fatigue fairly accurate in a few weeks or months. It is very expensive but in most cases it is required for US or international aircraft airline and military certification.
ATFSCrash 3 years ago
lejink: Generally all the prototype components are tested individually with the 100k cycle component tests, then after all the components designs pass the component tests, then they are assembled and tested as assemblies for 100k cycles. The length between cycles is usually determined by temperature and can vary because of mass and environmental factors.
ATFSCrash 3 years ago
I reckon a quick couple of blends on the 1st stage should sort it out! ha ha.
jeffhill1964 4 years ago
That sucker blowed up real good!
maddogmcrae 4 years ago
do you think can it fix again?
What was the problem?
Welding, Material,...
Saeedkachol 4 years ago
fix it? there was nothing left but the engine shell, lol =P i bet they put the fuel injection for afterburners in the wrong place or it got sucked in the fan or something silly
razgriz333 4 years ago
yup, looks catastophic to me!!
user2175 4 years ago
Now were did that rag go.....oops...
avionicswirenut 4 years ago
lol
figget44 4 years ago
Looks like the -100 that came apart on the stand at Kadena. Many a long day followed for the 3rd stage disk check after that.
Ghstwolf73 4 years ago
Great video by the way. I used to work in the hush house with the exact same engines F-100-100.
KSjetmech04 4 years ago
If you ever spent a night in the doghouse because you suggested your spouse, kids or other family member should go to the hush house; you might be an A&P (aircraft power plant technician or engineer).
(That's my variation of just Foxworthy's redneck jokes)
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
lol good one
KSjetmech04 4 years ago
Hey ATFSCrash- Do you know what the cause of this was? Just curious
KSjetmech04 4 years ago
No but I suspect jetmack31 might be correct. I suspect it might be a third stage fan disk failure on a F100-PW-100.
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
Snap
x80568056 4 years ago
Good thing it happened in the test chamber and not on the plane in the air...
OneSkiWonder 4 years ago
Was that a f100 turbo fan ??
f4cphantom2 4 years ago
I dunno...
I'm sure some would agree that catastrophic is a wee bit of a harsh comment
bodiguy 4 years ago
ok, what they mean is that it WOULD be catastrophic if already fitted in a working jet..of course not catastrophic in this test cell. duh.
torigolddust 4 years ago
bodiguy: I'm sure some would agree that it wasn't catastrophic; however there are people that still think the world is flat, the twin towers were destroyed with explosives, the US has extra terrestrial beings and spacecraft at area 51, if you drink cyanide laced Kool-Aid when a comet flies by you can catch a ride on a spacecraft, ect...
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
bodiguy: If you don't think it was catastrophic, I would like to see you stand next to one inside the cell that blows up like that. If you survive, If you still don't think it's catastrophic, then rebuild the engine within a week without exceeding the cost of the engine, and we'll put it in an airplane and send you up, if it'll even start and get off the ground without blowing up again.
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
LOL I hope you're being sarcastic? :) That looked destroyed to me by the end! hehe
jlebesis 4 years ago
Sure some would, we're called turbine mechanics, engineers and rocket scientists.
dieselscience 4 years ago
And that's why they have those cells!
salemcripple 4 years ago
X3 So good
cheeseboat15 4 years ago
actually bruffy 68 engines go boom shalackalack BOOM
millercork 4 years ago
oops i thought that was the fuel line not the oil line...
flyer892007 4 years ago
My tooth came out while watching this.
xXxmidgexXx 4 years ago
engine go boom....
bruffy68 4 years ago
Ever have a bad day?
LaserGuidance 4 years ago
I don´t understand! The engine was there like two seconds ago...
mast3rmoose 4 years ago 2
"cause a fan never fails"
Really? United Airlines 232 heavy, 19JUL89
69HemiGTX 4 years ago
ahhhh now I remember where I left my 9/16 wrench! oops
pratoriann 4 years ago 5
must be korean
MyturBinisdrty 4 years ago 2
Fan failure, prolly simulated. Those engines rarely, if ever, suffer such catastrophic failure due to at least double-redundant warning and control systems
Axetele 4 years ago
Wasn't simulated and it was the 2nd engine to shell-out in the same fashion, the first happend a year or two before the one your watching
F110mech 4 years ago
Look out! That engine is about to throw up! Too late.
Chuckjagermeister 4 years ago
Why did the engine explode?
rednecksinspace 4 years ago
3rd stage fan disk failure
F110mech 4 years ago
that should be on porpuse, cause a fan never fails...
there are vibration sensors, one for the fan...
sudnass 4 years ago
"cause a fan never fails"
They do sometimes very rarely fail; I think this might be one of them.
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
Erm, Did I just see a snuff video?
PerfectBlindness 4 years ago
pitty of the bad picture!
awsome vid!
bugsier5 4 years ago
yeah we use the same vcr tapes over and over, after a while the quality turns to crap
F110mech 4 years ago
try DVD-RW's :P
SgtSavage166 4 years ago
DVD-RW didn't exist at the time of this recording. :P
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
No DVD-RW's in 1991 and we still use VHS to this day, Recording engine runs is not required so why drop money in up-grading, plus the air force is broke :D
F110mech 4 years ago
At the houses @ Kunsan, the video is now recorded on a hard drive that records over itself every 4 or 5 days.
mushmouth1981 4 years ago
She blowed up real good!
maddogmcrae 4 years ago
apeppink, How does your comments apply to this jet engine video clip? This is a F-15 PW F100-100 engine exploding on a test stand, because of a 3rd stage fan disk failure. You seem to know a lot about what your talking about, but i dont see what it has to do with this at all... please inform
F110mech 4 years ago
Related tangent, but not directly with aircraft engines. He had me confused too, but close enough. The Germans were the first I know of to use air intercooled blades or stators as far back as WWII. A cutaway is at WPAFB museum, that shows the cooling system ;).
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
It was prompted by Kimmer6' comments. He mentioned a GE Frame 3 which is a heavy frame turbine, and things went on from there. I still like aviation though I haven't been involved in it in years. I used to be a C-130 mech/engr. in the Coast Guard in the late '60's.
apeppink 4 years ago
I was T-56 engine mech in the USMC during the late 80's and 90's. Worked the test cell, also, but never saw anything like this. Worst thing was a catastrophic engine oil leak...all over the golf course at MCAS El Toro. :)
jasfromoz 4 years ago
PW= Practically Worthless.
shiz302 4 years ago
oops
sooner49 4 years ago
I work TestCell on the same engine. You have to have great respect for the ground man because as you can see, things can go very bad very quickly.
CubanoSrA 4 years ago
i think some rabbit hopped in there,
seba5290 4 years ago
Time it took to turn a good engine into a flaming pile, 0.1 seconds.
Turbo617 4 years ago
Test cell. Nice! I was standing next to a General Electric frame 3 in Bahrain, heard something funny, dove off the catwalk in slo-mo and hit the trip button on the way down. I hid behind a concrete pillar and it took maybe 20 seconds to go from 7100 rpm to dead stop. The ground shuddered. The casings contained the failure, I almost died of heart failure.
kimmer6 4 years ago
Wow.
apeppink 4 years ago
What a disaster must ensue if steam flow is lost to the new steam cooled 1st stage nozzle turbines. Must be redundant flow loss trips on those.
apeppink 4 years ago
apeppink, dude what the hell are you talking about?
F110mech 4 years ago
Steam cooling on aircraft gas turbines? I am familiar with air cooling turbine blades, but not steam.
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
No. On heavy frame (electric power generating) gas turbines. Should've made that clear. Steam cooling is used in combined cycle units (gas turbine/steam turbine) in 1st stage nozzle and blade vanes to accommodate the high firing (combustion) temperatures employed for higher thermal efficiency. The new GE combined cycle units will convert 60% of the input fuel energy into busbar
apeppink 4 years ago
(electric) power, by far the highest in the world. Even higher if used in cogeneration (waste heat recovery for heating and air conditioning etc.). Next highest are the huge (MAN-B&W, Wartsila-Sulzer) 2 cycle marine diesels used on containerships etc., at ~50%. They too run in combined cycle - turbocharging, turbocompounding, waste heat recovery boiler (for steam turbine, fuel heating, hotel heating/air conditioning load),
apeppink 4 years ago
jacket water heat recovery (for seawater distillation etc.) shaft driven alternator, etc.
Some plants use light frame (aircraft gas turbines) with no fan (used as gas generators exhausting into power turbines), in special circumstances and on some ships. None are steam cooled that I'm aware of.
apeppink 4 years ago
See Kimmer6' comments above.
apeppink 4 years ago
Light frame turbines used in power generation, marine propulsion etc. are subject to more severe service in some ways, as they run MCR continuously while aircraft turbines run full power only during takeoff, all the remainder of their service cycle being at part load (except possibly military - sporadically running full power in dogfighting etc.).
apeppink 4 years ago
It looks like the fist stage compressor blades or the screw failed and was injested into the engine.
deijoh69 4 years ago
This was caused by 3rd stage fan disk failure, A known problem for the PW F100-100 engines.
F110mech 4 years ago
Obviously a major malfunction...
skinboy8 4 years ago
When I was in the industry we refered to these events not as "explosions" but "energetic dis-assemblys"
albionsseed 4 years ago
LOL, and is it sad that something like that does not surprise me? ;)
alphamone 4 years ago
lol ill have to use that one.
alin0steglinski0 4 years ago
was this a WOT blade out test?
jaxmkii 4 years ago
It could be but I think it is a mishap. All the blade out tests I have seen have special filming, instrumentation, ect.... From what I see it looks like an everyday test.
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
The only reason I ask is because I am in the USAF stationed in Okinawa, Japan at Kadena AB. I have worked for 6 years at the location where this motor came apart. This event happened in the early 90s, 1993 if I'm not mistaking. This guy is full of shit, because I have met some of the individuals involved in this accident. And, he was not one of the ones involved. Actually, this was the second engine in this facility that came apart, the first was not recorded.
papichulo202000 4 years ago
I was not involved with the mishap, so I don't know; I am connected with the industry however I have not found anyone yet that knows. It's possible they know, but not willing to talk since it is a secretive field, however this happened a long time ago, so I doubt secrecy is an issue anymore, however it is good normal policy to have tight lips.
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
BOOM! Headshot!
DeskFlyer 4 years ago
At what base did this engine blow up ??
papichulo202000 5 years ago
I do not know, I had been trying to find out the date and location of this incident. It looks like it may have happened in a factory test cell. However it could have happened at an Air Force base, because I got the video from the Air Force. jetmack31 sounds like he might know if he is not joking, but it sounds like he is serious and knows what he is talking about.
ATFSCrash 4 years ago
No the tech was not me I was recording data next to the run man in the cab. The other tech is the ground observer. This is so we can have a set of eyes on both sides of the engine.
jetmack31 5 years ago
The engine was on the test stand for a trim it was removed from one of the acft. We had just completed an adjustment on the UC (Unified control) and advanced the throttle after the tech left. At that point the mishap occurred. You don't have the entire film posted I know it is hard to come by now as it was taken by the SIB (Safety investigation board)
jetmack31 5 years ago
Great comments and great video response.
I knew much of what you said but your comments have enlightened me and your video response is totally new to me.
You still seem evasive about the tech leavening the cell, was that you? ;) wink wink nudge nudge. Please don't take offence at my joke.
Thanks a million.
ATFSCrash 5 years ago
Let's set the record straight I was present in the control cab when this mishap occurred, second it is as bad as it looks. What you are seeing is the third stage fan disk as a result of a material defect on the third stage fan disk causing mishap. The fire that resulted is from engine oil, what you are not seeing is the fan disk actually spinning around the test bay. What makes this incident so freighting to look back on is our fire suppression system DID NOT FIRE AS IT WAS SUPPOSED TO.
jetmack31 5 years ago
Every other test cell fire I have seen, you don't see much after the deluge. I was wandering why there was no deluge.
Did they edit the film or did technician leave the cell just a few seconds before, as shown? In either case he could have had a bad day.
ATFSCrash 5 years ago
Remember that this is not just a fire it is a loss of the entire fan section most test cell fires people have seen are on commercial aircraft engines not military engines. Past military engine designs were not designed to contain a failure of the entire fan disk Which left the stator case; if you look at the end of the video you can see that there is no fan there just the stator case It is standard practice to not have any tech in the run bay during maintenance runs because of failures like this
jetmack31 5 years ago
Those little sparks that I see hitting the ground behind the engine, are those peices of turbine blades being thrown out?
joshnc101 4 years ago
See what happens when a third stage fan disk ona F100-PW-100 engine fails
jetmack31 5 years ago
i think something went inside.
xXxmidgexXx 5 years ago
worthless limeys
motorbreath22 5 years ago
oh explosion!
sensiseed84 5 years ago
that will slow you down!
skywestav8r 5 years ago