The 4th suppressor appears to be a Type-5 .223 model from Mid States Armory in Missouri. The first round appeared to be louder than the second and third. These tests were done with supersonic ammo, if you use sub sonic all you would hear would be the bolt cycling. The odd thing about these things is if you fire across an open field you hear the crack, but it appears to be coming at you, you only hear the report when it bounces back at you from obstructions in front of you.
I can testify that the 3rd is indeed the M4-2000... I train with them frequently, and there is no mistaking one for me. The end is slightly rounded, for those confused here...
The author listed the 3rd one as the AAC M4-2000. It did seem the most quiet, with the TAC16 a close 2nd. No doubt that the 4th one was louder, as its a goofy-ass suppressor.
you have to turn your computers volume down to the minimum and wear some hearing protection... so you wont hear anything.. thats how silencers work :-)
I think 32 of 50 states they are legal for civi ownership. I get your point though, "I'd like two boxes of your WWB 45's and an....well lets see.....i think I'll try the EVO 45 today too please." "Have a nice day sir:)" Thats how the conversation at Wally World SHOULD be. A good guy trying to protect the hearing of ALL around him. DAMN!!, the alarm just went off, I was dreaming:(
None were AAC M4-2K or M4-1Ks. The endcaps are not flat on those.
The first appeared to be a TAC with the holes around circumference and I'd bet that 3 out of 4 were new TAC cans being tested against the low cost YHM- just above their price point.
Standard full power M855 ammo used. 1st is the TAC16 from Tactical Innovations, 2nd is the YHM PHANTOM Q/D ,3rd is the AAC M4 2000, and 4th is a Multi-Cal suppresor. Target hitting sound is a silliouette turkey @200yds:) NO hearing protection is needed with any of these suppressors, with any ammo.
Do you honestly think that something that breaks the sound barrier can actually be silent? As far as I know, there's no magic pixie dust that is able to remove the sonic boom from a projectile traveling at Mach 2-3.
That's why with most rifles silencers are just more to hide the flash and the very loud muzzle shock wave. But you are right, it doesn't do much for the bullet.
Standard full power M855 ammo used. 1st is the TAC16 from Tactical Innovations, 2nd is the YHM PHANTOM Q/D ,3rd is the AAC M4 2000, and 4th is a Multi-Cal suppresor. Target hitting sound is a silliouette turkey @200yds:) NO hearing protection is needed with any of these suppressors, with any ammo.
Using subsonics?
MavHunter20XX 6 months ago
@MavHunter20XX doesn't sound like it. you can still hear the "crack"
plechatam 4 days ago
@plechatam Was prob listening w/ low vol. I hear it now.
MavHunter20XX 3 days ago
Comment removed
waligon619 8 months ago
Comment removed
leadjunkie308 1 year ago
What models did you have there?
rbowen47 1 year ago
the 3rd suppressor carried the sound more than the first 2
guitaristsniper123 1 year ago
Comment removed
hk401 2 years ago
The 4th suppressor appears to be a Type-5 .223 model from Mid States Armory in Missouri. The first round appeared to be louder than the second and third. These tests were done with supersonic ammo, if you use sub sonic all you would hear would be the bolt cycling. The odd thing about these things is if you fire across an open field you hear the crack, but it appears to be coming at you, you only hear the report when it bounces back at you from obstructions in front of you.
pre9120 2 years ago
yea the third so im guessin the noise heard is the echo of the round
willadio 2 years ago
the third is best i think
maxehv 2 years ago
the 3rd one seemed most quiet. Which type of suppressor was the 3rd one?
McMike321 3 years ago
I can testify that the 3rd is indeed the M4-2000... I train with them frequently, and there is no mistaking one for me. The end is slightly rounded, for those confused here...
GMANinGA250 3 years ago
The author listed the 3rd one as the AAC M4-2000. It did seem the most quiet, with the TAC16 a close 2nd. No doubt that the 4th one was louder, as its a goofy-ass suppressor.
snipedu1st 3 years ago
It's prolly just an unpainted Form 1 can
yamo1231 3 years ago
i wonder if i shoved a silencer up my ass if i could get across the border home to canada.. the hard part would be going back for the gun :)
allnametaken 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wut if u fart with the silencer up ur ass, would it make a sound?
DerrickForLife 3 years ago
thats cool, been lookin for a vid like that, thanks
poyter789 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I thought he had a silencer on? I heard every shot
MuslimBob 4 years ago
never a shortage of these:)
Scottactical 4 years ago 3
haha yup
user0707 4 years ago 2
lool he fort i silencer makes it "silent" loool!
ashleycoles 4 years ago
@Scottactical I know right lol. Dam movies produced BS gun myths that everyone believes on silencers lol
SeanHatley 1 year ago
lol
you have to turn your computers volume down to the minimum and wear some hearing protection... so you wont hear anything.. thats how silencers work :-)
Reen4657 4 years ago 3
@MuslimBob your an idiot
Bowdlerizer 2 months ago
Awesome comparison, nice to hear that the TAC16 was on top (to my ears listening on the computer anyway). I'm waiting for mine to come in right now.
jdnedde 4 years ago
the last one was the worst, but the other three were equal :)
PWNAN8R 4 years ago
the last was the "multi-cal" with the bigger hole in the end.
Scottactical 4 years ago
Suppressors should be legal because they are a form of hearing protection.
USP1986 4 years ago 3
I think 32 of 50 states they are legal for civi ownership. I get your point though, "I'd like two boxes of your WWB 45's and an....well lets see.....i think I'll try the EVO 45 today too please." "Have a nice day sir:)" Thats how the conversation at Wally World SHOULD be. A good guy trying to protect the hearing of ALL around him. DAMN!!, the alarm just went off, I was dreaming:(
Scottactical 4 years ago 4
Nice to see them all compared like this back to back.
slimvtec 4 years ago
None were AAC M4-2K or M4-1Ks. The endcaps are not flat on those.
The first appeared to be a TAC with the holes around circumference and I'd bet that 3 out of 4 were new TAC cans being tested against the low cost YHM- just above their price point.
suicidehz 4 years ago
1st is the TAC16 from Tactical Innovations, 2nd is the YHM PHANTOM Q/D ,3rd is the AAC M4 2000, and 4th is a Multi-Cal
Scottactical 4 years ago
The endcaps are flat on the M4-2k. They are only rounded on the 1k.
paintballplayer700 4 years ago
I believe that's the YHM mount sitting during third test but the second didn't seem to have YHM pineapple grenade cuts.
suicidehz 4 years ago
3rd one is best. whichever that is.
suicidehz 4 years ago
Could you please add the 4 suppressor types and the firing order to the video description? That would be helpful.
paintballplayer700 4 years ago
Standard full power M855 ammo used. 1st is the TAC16 from Tactical Innovations, 2nd is the YHM PHANTOM Q/D ,3rd is the AAC M4 2000, and 4th is a Multi-Cal suppresor. Target hitting sound is a silliouette turkey @200yds:) NO hearing protection is needed with any of these suppressors, with any ammo.
Scottactical 4 years ago
quiet..... yea rite
jeffroboy48 4 years ago
Take your muffler/exhaust off your car.....now you know.
Scottactical 4 years ago
Do you honestly think that something that breaks the sound barrier can actually be silent? As far as I know, there's no magic pixie dust that is able to remove the sonic boom from a projectile traveling at Mach 2-3.
JPratt06 4 years ago
The object of a silencer is silence the cartridge, not the bullet.
z122643 4 years ago
That's why with most rifles silencers are just more to hide the flash and the very loud muzzle shock wave. But you are right, it doesn't do much for the bullet.
USP1986 4 years ago
Sounded to me like the 3rd one was the quitest, but really, they are all very close
bingo223 4 years ago
im sure you know, but it looke dlike the aac qd flash hider was sitting on the table when the third silencer was fireing?
jlkegl01 4 years ago
that is the YHM Phantom FH:)
Scottactical 4 years ago
Have you shot a Gemtech M4-02? I'm deciding that or that tac16.
manonfire756 4 years ago
I haven't heard the Gemtech.
Scottactical 4 years ago
Did you shoot that 4th can wet? you can see the projectile exiting or mabye its what ever you put in there.
zartantheassasin 4 years ago
The 4th (silver)is a multi-cal can. It has a bigger hole in it for larger calibers...
Scottactical 4 years ago
Not wet. The 4th is a multi-cal suppressor. (I think up to .30") Larger hole letting out more gases:)
Scottactical 4 years ago
I've been defending my TAC-16 for some time, glad to hear that the YHM actually appears to be a bit louder!
gunsandguitars 4 years ago
Yep, it holds it's own AND it comes apart!! HA!
Scottactical 4 years ago
Seriously, this video has shut up more than 1 naysayer on silencer talk -- thanks so much for posting this!!!
gunsandguitars 4 years ago
Standard full power M855 ammo used. 1st is the TAC16 from Tactical Innovations, 2nd is the YHM PHANTOM Q/D ,3rd is the AAC M4 2000, and 4th is a Multi-Cal suppresor. Target hitting sound is a silliouette turkey @200yds:) NO hearing protection is needed with any of these suppressors, with any ammo.
Scottactical 4 years ago