@CandyNStuff China and the US will NEVER go to war. First of all, there are no disputes between them that even come close to rising to that level. Secondly, it would result in an immediate mutual economic meltdown in both countries and likely a revolt in China and chaos in America. Thirdly, the benefits of a global partnership have not escaped the eyes of the more intelligent people of both countries. As for Russia, they're a small flea on a small dogs ass. We'd clobber them!!
you are all stupid. thinking you know shit about war. you get this shit from games and gossip and inaccurate bias on the internet. nothing ive read here sounds like it came from anyone but 15 year olds and nerds who think they know shit because they play video games. dumbasses.
Look USA Have the power to wage a war with the whole world including China and Russia there Military is bigger then anything, they have 2 active aircraft carriers then Europe put together and Europe have 4 Extra then Russia and China put together. I understand Russia and China believe they have a chance but im afraid you just dont. you expect your subs to sneak up and blow US Carriers up? that wont happen coz US learn from mistakes and will just send there 50+ Subs out. US+EU Would Win
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW As important as navy and air force to today's warfare, unfortunately they win battles, but not war. if we determine the outcome of a war by number of casualty alone, yes perhaps u.s would win that war, but please recall all the great powers in human history, the persians, alexander, romans, the spanish, the british, eventually they were all reduced to their native land. why? because they simply do not have the populace to assimilate and govern foreign land.
@TheDong1010 Yes but 50.000 People dont die in 1 battle lol. That was then this is now, its not Swords,Spears,shields and axes, its not trench war anymore, Moden war is about being smart it doesnt takee 40.000 Men to bring down an empire it takes 1 Unit of well trained men. so please dont use your stupid bla bla persian alexander bla bla 2 try and make me look dumb.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW you missed my point. what i'm trying to say, all the historical figures and empires i mentioned have won war with fewer men, because of superior leadership, equipment etc. but they could not hold their empire together because they just don't have the people to govern. to fully integrate a foreign land, you must destroy its native culture. the entire south america now speaks spanish and portuguese, and the americans even more complete.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW you are very correct that it is probably impossible for a submarine to sneak on a carrier fleet, but chinese's long range missile technology can easily match any nations in the world. when two super powers declare total war upon each other, no one will win in the end. because one cannot inflict complete destruction on the other without suffering the same fate.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW sorry for the long post. just one last example of how technology really does not determine the out come of war, I will not use afghanistan, but hongkong. it was a british colony until 1997, at the time much negotiation went on between UK and china, and margrete thatcher had more than once threatened china with force to prolong the treaty that would allow the continuation of hongkong's colonization.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW but eventually uk backed down, a famous scene when thatcher left the final meeting, she tripped on the stairs and fell to her knees, one can only imagine what was on her mind that someone who had been in front of cameras a million times before would be so absent minded. had the uk fought with the chinese, they would have absolute air and sea superiority, but to occupy hongkong, they must invade via land, and to fight the chinese on land, in china, is suicide.
@TheDong1010 The 1 thing with a war i would agree with you on, is land. EU + USA has a hell off a lot more air force and navy but the only problem would be land, a huge problem for them. So, if EU attacked china by land, they would lose, but if china came to attack EU via water or air, they would lose but then again, with nukes i guess we all lose.
@oiReWiin Yes but as proven in world war 2 it wont just be US fighting through russia or China it would be all of Europe with there army gaverd in Germany making 1 big push.
@TheDong1010 Yes but Uk and US dont invade with infantry untill the countrys defences are taken out. and UK have proven time and time again we can invade with less men look at falklands we had2 take it bk with 3000 Men agaisnt 13.000 Argentinians untill finally the reinforcements arrived then we made them surrender at stanley pretty much without a fight.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW I must say there are a few things to take consideration when comparing the falklands war and a presumed battle with china and russia. Even ignoring the entirety of technological difference between china, russia and argentina, there is such a thing as in mentality. when the british fought back then, it was considered self defense, since britain believes falklands is theirs, and obviously they will have the support back home.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW but a battle with china and russia will be seen differently. you said the allies will enter land warefare after they have completely crippled the chinese defensive system. ok let's again ignore the technical impossibility in that, that war will be seen as an invasion, and there will be much stronger anti war movement within britain, that cannot be ignored. historical example, Vietnam.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW back to the destruction of defensive infrastructures though, one must understand in today's standard, one war head will be all the difference it makes, and that means a complete saturated bombing of all military establishment that are spread out in 9600000 square kilo in china alone. and even the allies made it on land, the last time chinese fought invaders were 70 years ago, while the brits arguably has not experienced one since the normans, memory is fresh with renewed hatred
for the record, if you have the U.S. fighting you better have the U.N. in there. IF NOT THEN WHY THE FUCK IS THE U.S. PAYING 90% OF THE U.N. WITH NO HELP!!!!!!!!!
Also why are people arguing over UK in the world wars of the past? WWI was won largely due to the British Empire of the time controlling such a large part of the global land (and populations). In fact, both the world wars were started mostly because of the tension between the UK and its empire and Germany and its empire. The Germans lost both times. Anyway, we're fucking allies now, STFU. It's the Russians we still have to worry about, and the Chinese. EU+USA = win over Russia and China.
@George19881988 Im British i will never support the EU and its empire we are British europe tried for over a thousand years to conquer us and failed not now or ever will they! Russia and China are no threat neither have the capability to launch attacks abroad they are land based forces in the main part so they are not even close to invading the UK or USA etc its all propaganda.
@JamesCunnyy Well, Russia owns the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons in the world. According to Wiki, they own 2,430 active and 11,000 inative nukes. We have 160 active, 225 total... though the Russians would be sunk by the other nuclear countries if they launched anything. Mind you, they've got enough to nuke the shit out of all the other nuclear countries except the USA. China has too much business at stake with the EU and the USA to even consider any kind of attack.
Russia, China and Iran, when combined, have a total active force of 3,835,000 troops. The US has 1,425,113 active troops. Top 5 EU countries: France 352,771, Italy 293,202, Germany 250,613, UK 197,780, Greece 156,600; totalling 1,250,966 + the US troops = 2,676,079 troops: 3,835,000 troops VS 2,676,079 troops. Bear in mind the EU has 26 countries. Also note that most of the US forces are tied up already; but EU + USA outnumbers China, Iran and Russia... but in WW3, who would ally with who?!
Lets try it! Your Britain and I'm Russia + China (Crushyourassia/Crushia), Which sums - BRITAIN - 600,500 + SAS = 600,800 Russia + China = 3,000,000,000 +
@TheDragonblade999 Clever China have 3billion troops. but how many of them are truly soldiers ay :P i bet you every US and British soldier could outthink and outsmart any Russia anc China soldier why? because our training is far more harder we dont just say can you fire? "Erm a Little" Can you talk trash "Yes lots" Your in congrats. We not only have better training we have better technology and more planes,ships and tanks so have a go :)
@TheDragonblade999 i cant see too well but you seem to have put 3 billion.... i dont think china and russia combined have a military force that strong maybe you need to touch up on your maths before im gonna take what you say seriously.
People i donno if you didnt read this videos name but it does say UK=USA vs China and Russia. lets not fight eachother fight these hairy fuckers who think they eithen have a chance. fight these chineas fuckers who need 2 cut there dicks off before they ruin the world eithen more by populating 2 fast. we are allies for god sake so lets keep it that way on here. lets get some top voted comments up top and just kick these eastern fuckers up.
US+EU Carriers: 18+2 New QE and Older Carriers. China+Russia Carriers: 2 Old Shit Bricks from cold war with no aircraft on them. US+EU Navy Numbers: 1000+Ships Not Including auxiliary, survey or support ships. China+Russia Navy Numbers: 300+ (Very Old Ships) Not Including auxiliary, survey or support ships. US+EU Airforce: 30.000+ Aircraft(18k from US) Russia+China Airfroce: 7800. Only thing China and Russia got over us is Numbers in man power which is useless when your shit at fighting ;) PEACE
@hasan75ify Mhm Europe is a shit hole... Russians need 2 shave for once and China needs to stop making babys lol. Unlike Russia and China we dont have people living in huge villages made out of what ever material they can find because Europe arnt Barbarians like Russia and China. its yo who needs to drop dreaming America alone has more Ships and Aircraft then both Russia and China so best of luck when it does happen coz i hope when i sign up 2 fight i kill you. PEACE FUCKER.
D Day Normandy Britain who had held of for 3 years of bombing and dog fighting led the attack on Germany 3/5 of the Landings were done by Britain alone. other 2 America and France and any other countrys solder which fled to britain. so those that say America helped you need to read up your history if anything America just supplyed the reinforcements while britain lost thousands of gd men that day fighting for everyone else. i still like America because together Britain and America united OWN!
the uk was never saved by russians you must of forgot WE owened almot half the planets land mass russa has no chance aginst the uk we basicly won ww2 becuse everybody surrender we keapt fighting then when we started to win america came at the end to take the credit look it up america joind in ww2 hust before it finished they helped us a little bit in africa america has one of the stronget armys in the world britan is one of the most educated intalgent thinkers and bravest nation in the world
@DEAGLESnipezzxxx Yep exactly. Battle of Britain giving us air superiority in WW2. D-DAY, most the navy involved was British. They played a big part. USA still did very well and played a big part also. Yes after time Russia did start fighting back after the german tanks had froze up and half the men died because of the cold pushing them back. But as you said, they never "saved U.K"
Guys like Sir Oswald Mosley and many like him didn't want to be "saved".
Neither did Marshall Petain in France.
Also whether or not you saved the UK is pretty much a footnote because the main front of WW2 was the Eastern Front. There 80% of all German casaulties were. Don't believe me? Well, then I suggest you pick up a historical book about WW2, and another if you somehow don't believe the first.
Stop writing in captions. That's for videogame playing kids.
@21USNAVY Your kidding me right lol you saved us lol. While France and Russia ran away from there defence lines Britain was fighting a 3year Dog fighty with with like 1/5 of the numbers of Germany, yet we still won and didnt allow them to step foot on Britain unless they fell from there fkin planes. When Finally all theother countrys got there act together the 5 D Day Landings how many of the were doen bu brtain? 3/5 and america and france done the other 2 3/5 shows u who really won it
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW haha well if yall are trying to say that yalls country is better than ours, yall already tried to take us over with cannons, ships and so much more and failed badly while we had only guns that we stole from yall, and it shows something when every country in europe was taken over except the one AMERICA was defending!!!
@21USNAVY donno why your trying to turn this into a Britain vs America war, i have great respect for america and im glad you beat us back because we had way 2 much anyway. every empire has 2 fall at 1 point. end of the day we are allies and id like 2 keep it that way :) same as Britain and France we had a 100 year war yet we are Europes two greatest powers and plan on having a massive navy together sometime this year for some sorta Opperation. we're sending like 7 ships.
@21USNAVY Donno just read that a tash force of 5 Frigates 1 Type 45 Destroyer(HMS Diamond) and 1 Nuke Sub along with a tash force from france probz there aircraft carrier and some frigates its some sorta training thing guess we'll learn more when it comes around :P
@21USNAVY No the USA did not save Britan, Britan was virtualy in combat terms on its own two feet defending its air and was capable of defending its sea. The only assistance Britan needed from america was physical manpower to assult D-day and supplies such as food.
@weeguymo 100% Agree i mean look at all these battles when numbers have counted for shit lol. Thermopylae,Marathon,Gaugamela,Watling Street,Cannae and eithen Falklands when 3000 Troops untill reinforcements arrived had to fight through Argentina's well defended positions. Numbers dont count for anything unless the men are well Experienced like the mighty British and American Marines and SAS.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW you are my new best friend lol.america&britain have been& seen more combat than china&russia so its not like we are old and rusty.we have the best of the best and when its comes to sf's its britain or america that is always at the top above everyone else.you have got two countrys with the best rep in world&when they join forces they pack the world biggest punch..anyone with a brain would agree that they would 100 Experienced troops than 1000 chickens
@oi565 You are going to be in for a really big surprise when you come to terms with reality you will find size means nothing when it's going up against best trained and best technology countries. Not to mention NATO put their entire army together there wouldn't be a huge size difference between them
China***** Britain has built way way more carriers then China and we still have trouble with our new 1s because there massive and we havnt built big 1s before. So look at China they havnt built 1 full stop lol. Its ganna Take China a decade just to learn how to build them and it takes years to train pilots to fly off and land on them. so Mr Flordinhistory Get your facts right :).
Pilots Dont eithen have enough Pilots who know "Cat and Trap" so they'll have to use a ramp on the end of the carrier which puts them at a unfair advantage because the American and new British carriers let the pilots get in the skys faster so by time China have all there craft in the sky America are already bombing there country :). China has never built a aircraft carrier and believe me you need experiance which china doesnt have so end of the day America if needed can build 10times more
I like how all these wars are in the east. Canada, USA, UK will never have wars in there area cause they would just get destroyed. Also any war that ever would happen in America would last about 1-3days almost every American carries and knows how to shoot a gun well
admittedly we in the uk not much fighting but our intelligence and sf would knock out key targets and make china and russia defenceless against america our brothers in arms :)
no one will win except maybe the elitist/bankers neocon facist in their underground cities if they can survuive long enough for radiation to deminidh enough B4 they surface
oh and anyone who gets into such a spat is pretty daft. For one, Russia does have the ability to wage war on a single front and would take 3-4 years to build to launch a second massive offensive and even then it could only do so on it's own territory. It would be the East that launched Nukes first as they don't have the logistical capabilities to manourvre their armies around the world, they are in effect 'trapped', the West has great mobility. Hence we build missile defence shields idiots.
@lordzilu1584 Ever heard of Commonwealth? Canada,Falklands,Australlia and like 4 other countrys who The English Queen is there Queen lol. and Russia wouldnt use Nukes coz if they did then every other Country will just nuke them because its against NATO Rules and they dont just be fucking britain up they'll fuck every country around britain including Western Russia so think before you speak please. GLORY TO GREAT BRITAIN AND AMERICA :P
@lordzilu1584 Haha look up Commonwealth u stupid wanker lol. and Scotland dont wonna be Independent just some idiot there does but most of the people of Scotland voted no so get your facts right.... People if your ganna try and insult me please have your facts right because its just boring me lol. GLORY TO AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN AND DEATH T THOSE THAT OPPOSE US :P
@lordzilu1584 sorry i dont usually chime in on peoples comments but are u fucking daft yeah your right on the part that our old imperial colonies are now independent but chose out of their own free will to join the commonwealth of nations we still have the backing of 100s of millions of people and the Scots don't want independence because Scotland is mostly independent anyway they have their own parliament ffs sorry to jump in like but mate your an idiot if you think what u have said is true
@lordzilu1584 Britain is nothing now??? that's why we are a very small country yet have the best equipment and training their is as-well as USA. If any of the 4 countries that are ahead of us was the same size as Britain then they would be completely fucked. So you mouth of saying "Britain is nothing", if a British SAS or anyone from the British army burst through your door now you'd be the first under the bed.
@lordzilu1584 The only thing that matters in nuclear war is underground bunker territory, in which Britain has more miles per 100,000 people than any other country except Russia.
@lordzilu1584 You complete idiot, we have enough nukes to take out any country we want, we might not have 50k nuclear weapons but we got enough to take a lot of countries with us.
US and European Army's are well equipped and well trained...Going against them muscle to muscle(Conventional warfare) would be suicideThe best chance you have is Guirella warfare(UN conventional warfare) like the taliban and hope they dry out and retreat,But for the dominating force its a good chance to test, train, simulate and develop new weapons and tactics in real combat.casualties is not a big deal even it reaches 100k dead
so technically its not really a loosing battle its an opportunity.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW you must be America dick rider? you think isreal will fuck Iran up, I am going tell u like I told then next guy, u must be on the America drugs, isreal is awar that Iran will really hurt em, even America know this. n this is the reason why isreal will call 4 the America help, if the sillky America help, what u think the Russia is goin do?
@ismfofiscool123 Coming from the cunt who cant say that to me and has to say it 2 some dumb fuck who knows fuck all about war and Military. yeah gd 1 lol.
@parisfaith Well im English so u got that wrong :). andno im not a dick rider but i very much like mine getin riden and no Israel doesnt fear Iran and US is only there incase Iran try something stupid like use there nukes u fucking moron. do 1 you little wanker ur dumb as fuck. US AND UK WILL RULE THE SKYS,SEA AND LAND AND NO1 CAN DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT
@MultiDavid1121 u Think America will go to War with China or Russia? you must be on the America Drugs, what do u know bout war? what do u know about china or Russia millitry?
@parisfaith I know Russia can't even make a proper passenger jet without it's wheel falling off at Berlin runway let alone take on a superpower. As long as it says "Made in China" on the Chinese army I think we will also be fine. The fact you think USA wouldn't go to war against any off these is just stupid.
@chezzylee ok well it's NATO really not just USA and UK, chinas available man power alone is almost 750,000,000 and USA 145,000,000+ not including reserves. I might be a little off but "USA and U.K combined 3.5million troops"?
Just done some Adding and Worked out it will be 41 Countrys Including UK and US vs China,Russia,North Korea,Iran and what ever stupid country would dare back them up. So who ever thinks Russia and China have a hope in hell you got better chance of meeting god and kissing his White ass.
Try not to forget aswell people if China backed Russia, India and Japan will back US along with the Entire EU, ye China can call upon Iran then Isreal will fuck them up. then they can call upon N-Korea then South Korea and Japan will march through that shit hole. then they will cal upon God and the holy army of heaven, and we'll just laugh to death. China and Russia have no chance, Us and Us have more allies then Russia and China all of us United is un matched.
@parisfaith No they won't china nor russia could touch usa maybe uk but russia and china would cease to exist. and don't you even talk about how many fucking nukes you got cause america and uk can shoot them outa the sky and america won't need to use nukes. we got better shit.
hello its all britain we just dont call it the british empire anymore we have 17 crowned states and america is one of them, & while we've all been pissing about being headfucked by society & rest of time on an iphone or ipad,full of gm food,aspatemene flouride u name it,they have been busy building armies out of their citizens from birth.can u imagine the evryday uk or usa man in battle drunk swearing racial and religious abuse!dont make me laugh.you mock them but they're trained to fight you
All of EU Together has a Navy and Airforce that matches or better then US and has 1.6 Million Troops not including reservesmore then China. so EU and US with over 900-1000 Warships not including auxiliary, survey or support ships 18 Aircraft Carriers not Including Americas Older 1s and British two new QE Class Carriers. and Thousands of aircraft. on the other hand u got Russia 2 aircraft carriers from cold war xD and old aircraft and ships. Yes go Russia and China FUCKERS lol.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW Listen while you sit at home, sit quietly and do not insult the other ... At least it shows that your parents raised you are not in a good direction ... Greetings from Russia! :)
@brooklynakt Nice Come back maybe just as gd as Momma jokes. donno if u noticed but my post is in top 2 votes which basicly means FUCK YOU U RUSSIA PRICK lol.
@TheFlodemoe 3months haha. fuck me how old are you really 10? America has built more carriers then any1 and it still takes them years to do it. you cant build a 100.000ton Carrier in 3 months let alone 2 years u fucking moron. seriously get off this video your so dumb. Ow and China only have 1 Carrier and didnt build it themselfs it was a old cold war carrier very weak and very old. China doesnt have more workers because China dont know how to fucking build them. FUCK OF U DUMB FUCK
@2021marine Heard it all before but i can bet you dont know the full power of china like i know thefull power of britain and america as always your another person who speaks from his ass withot knowin fuck all about what hes on about.
Any1 else who replys to me with comeplet utter bollocks is geting blocked coz this arguement is just turning into people who understand Military arguen with 10 year olds who believe China can build a carrier in 3months let alone 3years
@2021marine China biggest manpower = still couldn't even invade USA with that alone as 90%+ would be wiped out trying to get their, by USA having like 15k+ planes and a big navy
Russia most nukes, USA, U.K and the other nuclear countries out their have enough to take out Russia or any country by their own nukes so no big deal. Drop 1 nuke in the centre of where all their nukes are and they're screwed
Britain + USA = Best trained troops + Best technology + NATO = unstoppable.
Doesn't matter. What DOES matter is who sits with the MONEY, and while the EU is going through serious problems with Greece, Ireland and Portugal, and soon possibly Italy and Spain and the US hardly can afford to wars they are involved in already in the Middle East, I wonder what planet you live on?
Stupid comments will always be flagged, and you're just some clown that plays videogames and doesn't even have a rudimentary understanding of world trade.
@McLarenMercedes Britain was in problems in 1982 then Argentina attacked the falklands and britain still stood strong and stood tall and sent a fleet of 90+ Ships Carriers,Frigates,Destroyers and Supply Doesnt matter if your country is in dier needs, when theres a war your country has to stand tall and never show weakness Greece might be in debt badly yet there military is still strong trust me they've already ordered Subs from Germany, Frigates from Italy. PEACE WANKER
@oiReWiin Only if the UK involves Canada and Australia, alone it would be a 5 minute KO from Russia. The Brits were saved by Russians almost every time.Russia is the second largest weapons producer, has large quantity of resources (human and mineral), and Russian tech is as good as American if not better (only in military field). India, Australia and South America will be far more important then UK.- more resources. UK/USA cant absorb so much attrition damage.
@Cyricist001 I'd pay £10,000,000 to see Russia gear up and get cross the channel and then take out Britain in 5 minutes. The Brits were not "saved by Russia almost every time" not even close, Russia is always supplying the enemy apart from the world wars but they didn't save Britain then. Russia tech is not "better then America". UK will be very important, you forget some of the weapons UK and USA have that would prove vital in a war, U.K and USA was the important ones in both world wars
@oiReWiin O RLY? Have you perhaps looked at USA-Russian military tech and made a comparison? Russians have a inferior car design but in military technology they were always a excellent player. Both World wars ended half a century ago, Britain had an Empire then, now its only a small island, and with a Empire it still had to wait for the US and SSSR to push the Germans back since it could not. Same with Napoleon. 1 Nuke submarine in the North sea and the UK is in a pickle.
@Cyricist001 Yes, it's a small island that could still kick most peoples asses apart from about 4 countries out there. " 1 nuke submarine and the UK is a pickle" don't really make sense but whatever. Who destroyed the German Luftwaffe and got air superiority? who sent the biggest amount of ships during D-DAY?. UK and USA were the main people in WW2 and don't underestimate Britain because of it's size......
@oiReWiin ....ah yes..past glories...Destroyed the Luftwaffe is inaccurate, you defeated it but it was still alive and kicking until capitulation.Your ship "armada" was obsolete, those were merchant ships and warships since WW1. Without American help you would have starved, and D-Day was a fig-leaf in comparison to the Soviet operations like Uranus or Operation Zitadelle..The most important nations in WW2 were Germany - USSR and US-Japan.
@Cyricist001 O dear so you're saying U.K wasn't an important nation during WW2, You're also saying D-DAY was a "fig-leaf". "You would have starved without USA" ??? You're a fucking moron, Take your I hate Britain and I think there army is shit, attitude somewhere else. I'm sick of twats like you trying to downgrade a great nation like Britain after all the men they lost helping others and defending themselves. You know NOTHING about the British military obviously.
@oiReWiin Look this is not the history channel, UK was a superpower in the past, but its importance now is second rate. I don't give a damn about Britain, you can be a superpower for all I care, but the fact remains it would be of little importance against giants like US,Russia and China.
@Cyricist001 and im sure thats what Persia thought about Macedon or Rome thought about Epirus or Argentina thought about britain. many times in history a bigger foe has underestimated a smaller country and have got there ass kicked for it. dont judge Britain by its size. our Airforce is still very strong, Our ships are still very strong and more advance then eithen america and you can search that up if u dont believe me. We might not have more stuff but we make it better then any1.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW ...you like old outdated examples don't you? And how would Britain attack Russia? Or would it wait until the US army arrives? Britain has the fewest military capable man, resources and land (less land, higher population density), if you think a Luftwaffe bombing on London was bad, you don't want to know what modern plains can transport (Tzar). If quality was enough to win wars, the Germans would rule Europa and Zulu would be unknown.Maid in Germany-the best.
@Cyricist001 I Take it uve never heard of a Type 45 Destroyer? Britain has 6 there capable of targeting and destroying 1000 Targets small as Cricket balls moving 3 times speed of sound. Its the most advance Destroyer in the world and makes short work of any plane no matter how good it was designed to make planes useless and will do it with eas. Go ahead and Search Type 45 because ull be amazed by it.
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW Except a few thousand Topol missile launchers with nuke war heads...anti sub sonar?....UK,France,Germany etc are building to sonar "invisible submarines" but Type 45 has a sonar....interesting, is it for fishing?
@Cyricist001 Ok you judge it my friend but when ww3 does happen which i personaly hope it doesnt coz it will just ruin the world :P when it does happen and Russian planes get blown up by a fleet of Type 45 destroyers near there coast ill make sure i come on here and say i told you so :) PEACE Now stop commenting to me im bored of this lol, ive made my point all russia anc china have is man power we own everything else
@Cyricist001 its SONAR is much more advanced than anything russia has, its the absolute best in current technology, and i way ahead of current anti-SONAR tech.
@Cyricist001 what you don't seem to understand like several people here have stated, U.K has amazingly advanced stuff, they might not have the size but it's the stuff that counts. Would you rather 50 tooth picks or 20 knives? U.K when they use their military along side U.S.A are unstoppable
@oiReWiin If they are poisoned tooth picks then yes. UK has helicopters, plains,tanks,subs and nukes so superior that they can outperform the Russian stuff when faced 20:1? what do they have regenerative shielding? For some reason people think that the Russian army has stopped advancing after the 80is. A question for you: what would you pick 1000 longbows or 100 muskets?
@Cyricist001 That went straight over your head didn't it. Pick a country the same size as Britain, Britain would destroy them. The ONLY reason Britain couldn't beat Russia is because of the difference between numbers that is all. I never said Britain would beat them in a 1v1 i'm trying to get it into your head that they're not as shit as you make them sound.
@oiReWiin ....Germany would lick the UK, probably France to, North and South Korea. My deepest apologies I thought that by the name of it UK would be fighting against Russia, but It seams the title is US=UK VS China+Italy.
@Cyricist001 By the fact that Germany has the Treaty of Versailles and can't have a big military they would in now way "lick" U.K and if you meant north and south Korea could beat U.K too then you really need to step back in reality. I have no idea what the fuck this whole "China + Italy" shit is about. By the name of it U.K and USA would be fighting against Russia together and they have proven when they get together they are unstoppable.
@oiReWiin Germany is the 3. largest arms producer in the world behind the US and Russia. They have more man power and high tech. It would be wise not to underestimate the Germans. If you don't get the sarcasm then best avoid talking to me, its my hobby.
@Cyricist001 At what point does it say it will be a 1v1 against U.K and Russia??? it doesn't and as you keep going on about it being that way you need to read the title properly. Now seriously get the fuck out of here you know NOTHING. Your remarks are just the same old crap with no valid facts behind them, they are just a Very bias and disrespectful opinion toward to the U.K. Oh and fyi, Germany isn't even in top 10 military's now jog along little boy it's a school day tomorrow
@oiReWiin It seams to me that from us two I'm defiantly not little :), and don't you worry about my school I already finished my college. HAHAHAHAH and you tell me I'm bias, if you read some of your comments you will see that you are not innocent on that front either.
@Cyricist001 Yeah I'm bias, that's why I give credit to USA Russia and all the other countries that did well where you just sit here going on about Britain. I don't worry about your school education as anyone can finish college with no proper marks and little understanding of the course they just took. I appreciate all countries that do their part just not twats like you that feel the need to insult Britain with invalid facts and retarded opinions.
@Cyricist001 when the UK is developing laser technology, electric "force field armour" invisibility cloaking technology, the FIST programs that will link the soldiers seemlessly to satellite GPS' and command quaters, rail guns, completely autonomous aircraft, more advanced missiles and targeting programs and so on. the US is the highest spender on military technology in the world, and the UK is the second highest, our kit will be too advanced for you to hanlde in a few years.
@GanzZulu UK is 6th. USA is #1, People's Republic of China is #2, France is #3, Japan is #4, Germany is #5. I only got this from Wikipedia, however. Go to: /wiki/List_of_countries_by_level_of_military_equipment
@Cyricist001 you could just as easily poison the knife, though. and the british have proven themselves countless times. like rorkes bridge, 132 men with muskets defeating 10,000 with spears.
in WW2 the soviet killed 1 german for every 15 soviets killed by the wehrmacht. the germans lost more men due to the russian winter by far...
@GanzZulu Germans killed 5 Allies for 1 German to and guess what? They still lost the war. 12000 Zulu with pears vs 1200 Bits with guns at Islandwana, enough? "Quantity has a quality all its own." Joseph Stalin.
@oiReWiin Quantity, quality... all the technology in the world didn't prevented USA to fail spectacularly in Afghanistan, so there's no fail-proof doctrine when it comes to warfare.
amazing stuff...yeah land warrior ,smart bombs and drones will all work when and if Russia or Chine decides to fire a few bloody well aimed missiles at US sats, US has taken intelligence gathering to the extreme , but have made a tactical error, because they do not own space..or even sub orbital, its tactics and money, uk/usa may have 1, but not both
@benjik17 Well to be honest, UK/USA has the tactics but then again, nothing comes close to the size of their navy or air force either, they are not just rubbish ships which is why they have so many, they are the most advanced ones as well, at least most of them are anyway
CAPITALISM creates ELITE CRIMINALS. BANKERS. DRUG LORDS. INEQUALITY. INSECURITY. GREED. RUTHLESS COMMUNISM. NWO. NAZI. TERRORISM. LAZY PEOPLE. REBEL POLITICIAN. ANARCHY. worst is WAR etc. etc.. ☠ ☢ ☠ ☢ ☠ ☢ ☠
CAPITALISM was designed only for CORRUPT OPPORTUNISTIC MANIPULATIVE LAZY POLITICIAN. BANKERS. LAWYERS. DRUG LORDS. JUDGES. CRIMINALS. DICTATORS. RULERS. KING. SULTANATE. EMPEROR etc..
HARD WORKING PEACE LOVING HAPPY HONEST SOCIETY were always the slave victim and poorly starve to death. :(
America vs Russia = The United Nations vs Farmers with Ak 47's.
United Nations = 75% of the worlds military
Farmers with Ak's = FAIL
CandyNStuff 1 hour ago
@CandyNStuff China and the US will NEVER go to war. First of all, there are no disputes between them that even come close to rising to that level. Secondly, it would result in an immediate mutual economic meltdown in both countries and likely a revolt in China and chaos in America. Thirdly, the benefits of a global partnership have not escaped the eyes of the more intelligent people of both countries. As for Russia, they're a small flea on a small dogs ass. We'd clobber them!!
blamedorger 1 hour ago
All Comments are just a waste of time, better go to church to pray for your soul, if your soul can go to Heaven.
tonyblair666666 4 hours ago
you are all stupid. thinking you know shit about war. you get this shit from games and gossip and inaccurate bias on the internet. nothing ive read here sounds like it came from anyone but 15 year olds and nerds who think they know shit because they play video games. dumbasses.
harper4253 9 hours ago
@harper4253 OK Mr Albert Einstein, Lets see your super war knowledge then aye???
oiReWiin 5 hours ago
Look USA Have the power to wage a war with the whole world including China and Russia there Military is bigger then anything, they have 2 active aircraft carriers then Europe put together and Europe have 4 Extra then Russia and China put together. I understand Russia and China believe they have a chance but im afraid you just dont. you expect your subs to sneak up and blow US Carriers up? that wont happen coz US learn from mistakes and will just send there 50+ Subs out. US+EU Would Win
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 18 hours ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW As important as navy and air force to today's warfare, unfortunately they win battles, but not war. if we determine the outcome of a war by number of casualty alone, yes perhaps u.s would win that war, but please recall all the great powers in human history, the persians, alexander, romans, the spanish, the british, eventually they were all reduced to their native land. why? because they simply do not have the populace to assimilate and govern foreign land.
TheDong1010 15 hours ago
@TheDong1010 Yes but 50.000 People dont die in 1 battle lol. That was then this is now, its not Swords,Spears,shields and axes, its not trench war anymore, Moden war is about being smart it doesnt takee 40.000 Men to bring down an empire it takes 1 Unit of well trained men. so please dont use your stupid bla bla persian alexander bla bla 2 try and make me look dumb.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 14 hours ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW you missed my point. what i'm trying to say, all the historical figures and empires i mentioned have won war with fewer men, because of superior leadership, equipment etc. but they could not hold their empire together because they just don't have the people to govern. to fully integrate a foreign land, you must destroy its native culture. the entire south america now speaks spanish and portuguese, and the americans even more complete.
TheDong1010 7 hours ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW you are very correct that it is probably impossible for a submarine to sneak on a carrier fleet, but chinese's long range missile technology can easily match any nations in the world. when two super powers declare total war upon each other, no one will win in the end. because one cannot inflict complete destruction on the other without suffering the same fate.
TheDong1010 15 hours ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW sorry for the long post. just one last example of how technology really does not determine the out come of war, I will not use afghanistan, but hongkong. it was a british colony until 1997, at the time much negotiation went on between UK and china, and margrete thatcher had more than once threatened china with force to prolong the treaty that would allow the continuation of hongkong's colonization.
TheDong1010 15 hours ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW but eventually uk backed down, a famous scene when thatcher left the final meeting, she tripped on the stairs and fell to her knees, one can only imagine what was on her mind that someone who had been in front of cameras a million times before would be so absent minded. had the uk fought with the chinese, they would have absolute air and sea superiority, but to occupy hongkong, they must invade via land, and to fight the chinese on land, in china, is suicide.
TheDong1010 15 hours ago
@TheDong1010 The 1 thing with a war i would agree with you on, is land. EU + USA has a hell off a lot more air force and navy but the only problem would be land, a huge problem for them. So, if EU attacked china by land, they would lose, but if china came to attack EU via water or air, they would lose but then again, with nukes i guess we all lose.
oiReWiin 15 hours ago
@oiReWiin Yes but as proven in world war 2 it wont just be US fighting through russia or China it would be all of Europe with there army gaverd in Germany making 1 big push.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 14 hours ago
@TheDong1010 Yes but Uk and US dont invade with infantry untill the countrys defences are taken out. and UK have proven time and time again we can invade with less men look at falklands we had2 take it bk with 3000 Men agaisnt 13.000 Argentinians untill finally the reinforcements arrived then we made them surrender at stanley pretty much without a fight.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 14 hours ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW I must say there are a few things to take consideration when comparing the falklands war and a presumed battle with china and russia. Even ignoring the entirety of technological difference between china, russia and argentina, there is such a thing as in mentality. when the british fought back then, it was considered self defense, since britain believes falklands is theirs, and obviously they will have the support back home.
TheDong1010 8 hours ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW but a battle with china and russia will be seen differently. you said the allies will enter land warefare after they have completely crippled the chinese defensive system. ok let's again ignore the technical impossibility in that, that war will be seen as an invasion, and there will be much stronger anti war movement within britain, that cannot be ignored. historical example, Vietnam.
TheDong1010 7 hours ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW back to the destruction of defensive infrastructures though, one must understand in today's standard, one war head will be all the difference it makes, and that means a complete saturated bombing of all military establishment that are spread out in 9600000 square kilo in china alone. and even the allies made it on land, the last time chinese fought invaders were 70 years ago, while the brits arguably has not experienced one since the normans, memory is fresh with renewed hatred
TheDong1010 7 hours ago
for the record, if you have the U.S. fighting you better have the U.N. in there. IF NOT THEN WHY THE FUCK IS THE U.S. PAYING 90% OF THE U.N. WITH NO HELP!!!!!!!!!
beastlyman01265 2 days ago
@beastlyman01265 USA ALWAYS gets help.
oiReWiin 2 days ago
Also why are people arguing over UK in the world wars of the past? WWI was won largely due to the British Empire of the time controlling such a large part of the global land (and populations). In fact, both the world wars were started mostly because of the tension between the UK and its empire and Germany and its empire. The Germans lost both times. Anyway, we're fucking allies now, STFU. It's the Russians we still have to worry about, and the Chinese. EU+USA = win over Russia and China.
George19881988 2 days ago
@George19881988 Im British i will never support the EU and its empire we are British europe tried for over a thousand years to conquer us and failed not now or ever will they! Russia and China are no threat neither have the capability to launch attacks abroad they are land based forces in the main part so they are not even close to invading the UK or USA etc its all propaganda.
JamesCunnyy 1 day ago
@JamesCunnyy Well, Russia owns the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons in the world. According to Wiki, they own 2,430 active and 11,000 inative nukes. We have 160 active, 225 total... though the Russians would be sunk by the other nuclear countries if they launched anything. Mind you, they've got enough to nuke the shit out of all the other nuclear countries except the USA. China has too much business at stake with the EU and the USA to even consider any kind of attack.
George19881988 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Russia, China and Iran, when combined, have a total active force of 3,835,000 troops. The US has 1,425,113 active troops. Top 5 EU countries: France 352,771, Italy 293,202, Germany 250,613, UK 197,780, Greece 156,600; totalling 1,250,966 + the US troops = 2,676,079 troops: 3,835,000 troops VS 2,676,079 troops. Bear in mind the EU has 26 countries. Also note that most of the US forces are tied up already; but EU + USA outnumbers China, Iran and Russia... but in WW3, who would ally with who?!
George19881988 2 days ago
USA V.S Russia and China
Russia and China win
USA and USA's Allies V.S Russia China North Korea and Iran
if that happens...well than humanity is f'd...
BlackBelt3rdDegree 2 days ago
Lets try it! Your Britain and I'm Russia + China (Crushyourassia/Crushia), Which sums - BRITAIN - 600,500 + SAS = 600,800 Russia + China = 3,000,000,000 +
TheDragonblade999 2 days ago
@TheDragonblade999 BUT, with America..Lets give it a shot (This time I am Bramerica (Britain + America) )
TheDragonblade999 2 days ago
@TheDragonblade999 Clever China have 3billion troops. but how many of them are truly soldiers ay :P i bet you every US and British soldier could outthink and outsmart any Russia anc China soldier why? because our training is far more harder we dont just say can you fire? "Erm a Little" Can you talk trash "Yes lots" Your in congrats. We not only have better training we have better technology and more planes,ships and tanks so have a go :)
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 2 days ago
@TheDragonblade999 i cant see too well but you seem to have put 3 billion.... i dont think china and russia combined have a military force that strong maybe you need to touch up on your maths before im gonna take what you say seriously.
mrrainman5ifty 1 day ago
im chinese, i prefer eternal peace
WindowsXpExpert 2 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW fuck you racist, im chinese, and i can fk up ur computer
WindowsXpExpert 2 days ago
@WindowsXpExpert go ahead and try :)
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 2 days ago
@WindowsXpExpert haha lol
21USNAVY 2 days ago
People i donno if you didnt read this videos name but it does say UK=USA vs China and Russia. lets not fight eachother fight these hairy fuckers who think they eithen have a chance. fight these chineas fuckers who need 2 cut there dicks off before they ruin the world eithen more by populating 2 fast. we are allies for god sake so lets keep it that way on here. lets get some top voted comments up top and just kick these eastern fuckers up.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 2 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW awesome comment!
AMYFENGISGUILTY 2 days ago
Boohoo why make dis shit?
XiaoDanDragon 3 days ago
Wall Street WIN. :)
ProgVIA 3 days ago
Bla bla bla
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 3 days ago
US+EU Carriers: 18+2 New QE and Older Carriers. China+Russia Carriers: 2 Old Shit Bricks from cold war with no aircraft on them. US+EU Navy Numbers: 1000+Ships Not Including auxiliary, survey or support ships. China+Russia Navy Numbers: 300+ (Very Old Ships) Not Including auxiliary, survey or support ships. US+EU Airforce: 30.000+ Aircraft(18k from US) Russia+China Airfroce: 7800. Only thing China and Russia got over us is Numbers in man power which is useless when your shit at fighting ;) PEACE
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 4 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW hahaha europe is a shit hole, turkey won them and england lick americas ass, u can never win russia or china, stop dreaming
hasan75ify 4 days ago
@hasan75ify Mhm Europe is a shit hole... Russians need 2 shave for once and China needs to stop making babys lol. Unlike Russia and China we dont have people living in huge villages made out of what ever material they can find because Europe arnt Barbarians like Russia and China. its yo who needs to drop dreaming America alone has more Ships and Aircraft then both Russia and China so best of luck when it does happen coz i hope when i sign up 2 fight i kill you. PEACE FUCKER.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 4 days ago
@hasan75ify For the record, *Britain* not "england"
oiReWiin 4 days ago
@oiReWiin no hu cares england is britain
hasan75ify 4 days ago
@hasan75ify You're a dumb ass
oiReWiin 4 days ago
Conversation Over Great britain and USA win.
OpticHunt 4 days ago
@OpticHunt yh in there dreams,
hasan75ify 4 days ago
D Day Normandy Britain who had held of for 3 years of bombing and dog fighting led the attack on Germany 3/5 of the Landings were done by Britain alone. other 2 America and France and any other countrys solder which fled to britain. so those that say America helped you need to read up your history if anything America just supplyed the reinforcements while britain lost thousands of gd men that day fighting for everyone else. i still like America because together Britain and America united OWN!
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 4 days ago
this fukin song blows omg shoot your self
fresholm 4 days ago
I LOVE HOW THE WE THE USA AND THE UK ARE ALLIES BUT IN ANYOTHER VIDEO BRITISH PEOPLE HATE ON AMERICA IT FUCKING PISSES ME OFF
21USNAVY 4 days ago
LMFAO! its more like UK , USA , FRANCE , GERMANY , NATO AGAINST DONKEY RIDING TALIBAN 10 years later still trying to win
zakaslam1 5 days ago
the uk was never saved by russians you must of forgot WE owened almot half the planets land mass russa has no chance aginst the uk we basicly won ww2 becuse everybody surrender we keapt fighting then when we started to win america came at the end to take the credit look it up america joind in ww2 hust before it finished they helped us a little bit in africa america has one of the stronget armys in the world britan is one of the most educated intalgent thinkers and bravest nation in the world
DEAGLESnipezzxxx 5 days ago
@DEAGLESnipezzxxx Yep exactly. Battle of Britain giving us air superiority in WW2. D-DAY, most the navy involved was British. They played a big part. USA still did very well and played a big part also. Yes after time Russia did start fighting back after the german tanks had froze up and half the men died because of the cold pushing them back. But as you said, they never "saved U.K"
oiReWiin 5 days ago
@DEAGLESnipezzxxx US THE USA SAVED THE UK IN WW2
21USNAVY 4 days ago
@21USNAVY
Guys like Sir Oswald Mosley and many like him didn't want to be "saved".
Neither did Marshall Petain in France.
Also whether or not you saved the UK is pretty much a footnote because the main front of WW2 was the Eastern Front. There 80% of all German casaulties were. Don't believe me? Well, then I suggest you pick up a historical book about WW2, and another if you somehow don't believe the first.
Stop writing in captions. That's for videogame playing kids.
McLarenMercedes 4 days ago
@McLarenMercedes WE saved you your welcome(; yall wanna try to fight us again????
21USNAVY 3 days ago
@21USNAVY Your kidding me right lol you saved us lol. While France and Russia ran away from there defence lines Britain was fighting a 3year Dog fighty with with like 1/5 of the numbers of Germany, yet we still won and didnt allow them to step foot on Britain unless they fell from there fkin planes. When Finally all theother countrys got there act together the 5 D Day Landings how many of the were doen bu brtain? 3/5 and america and france done the other 2 3/5 shows u who really won it
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 4 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW haha well if yall are trying to say that yalls country is better than ours, yall already tried to take us over with cannons, ships and so much more and failed badly while we had only guns that we stole from yall, and it shows something when every country in europe was taken over except the one AMERICA was defending!!!
21USNAVY 3 days ago
@21USNAVY donno why your trying to turn this into a Britain vs America war, i have great respect for america and im glad you beat us back because we had way 2 much anyway. every empire has 2 fall at 1 point. end of the day we are allies and id like 2 keep it that way :) same as Britain and France we had a 100 year war yet we are Europes two greatest powers and plan on having a massive navy together sometime this year for some sorta Opperation. we're sending like 7 ships.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 2 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW yall are sending seven ships where?
21USNAVY 2 days ago
@21USNAVY Donno just read that a tash force of 5 Frigates 1 Type 45 Destroyer(HMS Diamond) and 1 Nuke Sub along with a tash force from france probz there aircraft carrier and some frigates its some sorta training thing guess we'll learn more when it comes around :P
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 2 days ago
@21USNAVY No the USA did not save Britan, Britan was virtualy in combat terms on its own two feet defending its air and was capable of defending its sea. The only assistance Britan needed from america was physical manpower to assult D-day and supplies such as food.
Scottx125Productions 4 days ago
@DEAGLESnipezzxxx Grammar Nazis think your bluffing.
Cyricist001 4 days ago
usa and u.k perfect team because america got the gear britain got the skills
lennon98williams 5 days ago
Thanks all for top voted comment :) Show these British and America haters xD
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 6 days ago
people say china and russia will win because they have numbers on there side
thats BULLSHIT
all that means is the the UK and US will get more shooting practice :)
weeguymo 6 days ago
@weeguymo 100% Agree i mean look at all these battles when numbers have counted for shit lol. Thermopylae,Marathon,Gaugamela,Watling Street,Cannae and eithen Falklands when 3000 Troops untill reinforcements arrived had to fight through Argentina's well defended positions. Numbers dont count for anything unless the men are well Experienced like the mighty British and American Marines and SAS.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 6 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW you are my new best friend lol.america&britain have been& seen more combat than china&russia so its not like we are old and rusty.we have the best of the best and when its comes to sf's its britain or america that is always at the top above everyone else.you have got two countrys with the best rep in world&when they join forces they pack the world biggest punch..anyone with a brain would agree that they would 100 Experienced troops than 1000 chickens
weeguymo 5 days ago
Russia and China of course
oi565 6 days ago
@oi565 You are going to be in for a really big surprise when you come to terms with reality you will find size means nothing when it's going up against best trained and best technology countries. Not to mention NATO put their entire army together there wouldn't be a huge size difference between them
oiReWiin 5 days ago
its nukes tho
itsonlyoldskool 6 days ago
China***** Britain has built way way more carriers then China and we still have trouble with our new 1s because there massive and we havnt built big 1s before. So look at China they havnt built 1 full stop lol. Its ganna Take China a decade just to learn how to build them and it takes years to train pilots to fly off and land on them. so Mr Flordinhistory Get your facts right :).
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 6 days ago
Pilots Dont eithen have enough Pilots who know "Cat and Trap" so they'll have to use a ramp on the end of the carrier which puts them at a unfair advantage because the American and new British carriers let the pilots get in the skys faster so by time China have all there craft in the sky America are already bombing there country :). China has never built a aircraft carrier and believe me you need experiance which china doesnt have so end of the day America if needed can build 10times more
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 6 days ago
Every1 check the Comment Below about building more carriers then US in 3 months lol.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 6 days ago
I like how all these wars are in the east. Canada, USA, UK will never have wars in there area cause they would just get destroyed. Also any war that ever would happen in America would last about 1-3days almost every American carries and knows how to shoot a gun well
MrVarct 1 week ago
@MrVarct right on bro
mxslugger27 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrVarct right on bro
lol
mxslugger27 1 week ago
admittedly we in the uk not much fighting but our intelligence and sf would knock out key targets and make china and russia defenceless against america our brothers in arms :)
ccbr1 1 week ago
no one will win except maybe the elitist/bankers neocon facist in their underground cities if they can survuive long enough for radiation to deminidh enough B4 they surface
polygamous1 1 week ago
oh and anyone who gets into such a spat is pretty daft. For one, Russia does have the ability to wage war on a single front and would take 3-4 years to build to launch a second massive offensive and even then it could only do so on it's own territory. It would be the East that launched Nukes first as they don't have the logistical capabilities to manourvre their armies around the world, they are in effect 'trapped', the West has great mobility. Hence we build missile defence shields idiots.
madzangels 1 week ago
Chaina go make me a IPod and Russia go shave your hairy ass because thats all your good at
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 1 week ago
UK doesn't have any chances it has no territority size for nuclear war
lordzilu1584 1 week ago
@lordzilu1584 Ever heard of Commonwealth? Canada,Falklands,Australlia and like 4 other countrys who The English Queen is there Queen lol. and Russia wouldnt use Nukes coz if they did then every other Country will just nuke them because its against NATO Rules and they dont just be fucking britain up they'll fuck every country around britain including Western Russia so think before you speak please. GLORY TO GREAT BRITAIN AND AMERICA :P
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 1 week ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW you stupid British cunt, British is nothing now
Canada and Aus are all independent countries you slut
Now Scotland wants to be independent too you 2nd-class poor bastard small nation
lordzilu1584 1 week ago
@lordzilu1584 Haha look up Commonwealth u stupid wanker lol. and Scotland dont wonna be Independent just some idiot there does but most of the people of Scotland voted no so get your facts right.... People if your ganna try and insult me please have your facts right because its just boring me lol. GLORY TO AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN AND DEATH T THOSE THAT OPPOSE US :P
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 1 week ago
@lordzilu1584 sorry i dont usually chime in on peoples comments but are u fucking daft yeah your right on the part that our old imperial colonies are now independent but chose out of their own free will to join the commonwealth of nations we still have the backing of 100s of millions of people and the Scots don't want independence because Scotland is mostly independent anyway they have their own parliament ffs sorry to jump in like but mate your an idiot if you think what u have said is true
pudsey111 1 week ago
@lordzilu1584 Britain is nothing now??? that's why we are a very small country yet have the best equipment and training their is as-well as USA. If any of the 4 countries that are ahead of us was the same size as Britain then they would be completely fucked. So you mouth of saying "Britain is nothing", if a British SAS or anyone from the British army burst through your door now you'd be the first under the bed.
oiReWiin 5 days ago
@lordzilu1584 The only thing that matters in nuclear war is underground bunker territory, in which Britain has more miles per 100,000 people than any other country except Russia.
Funny that eh.
madzangels 1 week ago
@lordzilu1584 You complete idiot, we have enough nukes to take out any country we want, we might not have 50k nuclear weapons but we got enough to take a lot of countries with us.
oiReWiin 5 days ago
why do people always put the army as the signal for the military i dont think that the army has warships do it right next time
thenavy1995 1 week ago
US and European Army's are well equipped and well trained...Going against them muscle to muscle(Conventional warfare) would be suicideThe best chance you have is Guirella warfare(UN conventional warfare) like the taliban and hope they dry out and retreat,But for the dominating force its a good chance to test, train, simulate and develop new weapons and tactics in real combat.casualties is not a big deal even it reaches 100k dead
so technically its not really a loosing battle its an opportunity.
shinjiprofile 1 week ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW you must be America dick rider? you think isreal will fuck Iran up, I am going tell u like I told then next guy, u must be on the America drugs, isreal is awar that Iran will really hurt em, even America know this. n this is the reason why isreal will call 4 the America help, if the sillky America help, what u think the Russia is goin do?
parisfaith 1 week ago
@parisfaith hes dumb don't listen to him
ismfofiscool123 1 week ago
@ismfofiscool123 Coming from the cunt who cant say that to me and has to say it 2 some dumb fuck who knows fuck all about war and Military. yeah gd 1 lol.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 1 week ago
@parisfaith Well im English so u got that wrong :). andno im not a dick rider but i very much like mine getin riden and no Israel doesnt fear Iran and US is only there incase Iran try something stupid like use there nukes u fucking moron. do 1 you little wanker ur dumb as fuck. US AND UK WILL RULE THE SKYS,SEA AND LAND AND NO1 CAN DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 1 week ago
@MultiDavid1121 u Think America will go to War with China or Russia? you must be on the America Drugs, what do u know bout war? what do u know about china or Russia millitry?
parisfaith 1 week ago
@parisfaith russian military isn't even that good they just have nukes
ismfofiscool123 1 week ago
@parisfaith I know Russia can't even make a proper passenger jet without it's wheel falling off at Berlin runway let alone take on a superpower. As long as it says "Made in China" on the Chinese army I think we will also be fine. The fact you think USA wouldn't go to war against any off these is just stupid.
oiReWiin 5 days ago
Comment removed
chezzylee 1 week ago
@chezzylee ok well it's NATO really not just USA and UK, chinas available man power alone is almost 750,000,000 and USA 145,000,000+ not including reserves. I might be a little off but "USA and U.K combined 3.5million troops"?
oiReWiin 1 week ago
Just done some Adding and Worked out it will be 41 Countrys Including UK and US vs China,Russia,North Korea,Iran and what ever stupid country would dare back them up. So who ever thinks Russia and China have a hope in hell you got better chance of meeting god and kissing his White ass.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 1 week ago
Try not to forget aswell people if China backed Russia, India and Japan will back US along with the Entire EU, ye China can call upon Iran then Isreal will fuck them up. then they can call upon N-Korea then South Korea and Japan will march through that shit hole. then they will cal upon God and the holy army of heaven, and we'll just laugh to death. China and Russia have no chance, Us and Us have more allies then Russia and China all of us United is un matched.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 1 week ago
@MultiDavid1121 dude do you know anything bout war, china and Russia will really hurt u.s and . u.k
parisfaith 1 week ago
@parisfaith No they won't china nor russia could touch usa maybe uk but russia and china would cease to exist. and don't you even talk about how many fucking nukes you got cause america and uk can shoot them outa the sky and america won't need to use nukes. we got better shit.
kylewest100 1 week ago
@parisfaith Your an idiot for even thinking that both Russia and China has a chance.
MultiDavid1121 1 week ago
hello its all britain we just dont call it the british empire anymore we have 17 crowned states and america is one of them, & while we've all been pissing about being headfucked by society & rest of time on an iphone or ipad,full of gm food,aspatemene flouride u name it,they have been busy building armies out of their citizens from birth.can u imagine the evryday uk or usa man in battle drunk swearing racial and religious abuse!dont make me laugh.you mock them but they're trained to fight you
mamamonster2011 1 week ago 4
China Like big guns with little effect while Us and Uk like Small Guns with HUGE EFFECT!
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All of EU Together has a Navy and Airforce that matches or better then US and has 1.6 Million Troops not including reservesmore then China. so EU and US with over 900-1000 Warships not including auxiliary, survey or support ships 18 Aircraft Carriers not Including Americas Older 1s and British two new QE Class Carriers. and Thousands of aircraft. on the other hand u got Russia 2 aircraft carriers from cold war xD and old aircraft and ships. Yes go Russia and China FUCKERS lol.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 1 week ago 15
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW lol your right China an russia can sucka dis dang dang.
kylewest100 1 week ago
Comment removed
brooklynakt 1 week ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW Listen while you sit at home, sit quietly and do not insult the other ... At least it shows that your parents raised you are not in a good direction ... Greetings from Russia! :)
brooklynakt 1 week ago
@brooklynakt Nice Come back maybe just as gd as Momma jokes. donno if u noticed but my post is in top 2 votes which basicly means FUCK YOU U RUSSIA PRICK lol.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 1 week ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW if war begins china has in 3 month more carriers than the us. they have mor worker and no work regulation.
TheFlodemoe 6 days ago
@TheFlodemoe 3months haha. fuck me how old are you really 10? America has built more carriers then any1 and it still takes them years to do it. you cant build a 100.000ton Carrier in 3 months let alone 2 years u fucking moron. seriously get off this video your so dumb. Ow and China only have 1 Carrier and didnt build it themselfs it was a old cold war carrier very weak and very old. China doesnt have more workers because China dont know how to fucking build them. FUCK OF U DUMB FUCK
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 6 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW onli rusia fucked usa my friend rusia is very big power.
2021marine 5 days ago
@2021marine Heard it all before but i can bet you dont know the full power of china like i know thefull power of britain and america as always your another person who speaks from his ass withot knowin fuck all about what hes on about.
Any1 else who replys to me with comeplet utter bollocks is geting blocked coz this arguement is just turning into people who understand Military arguen with 10 year olds who believe China can build a carrier in 3months let alone 3years
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 5 days ago
@2021marine you do realize your weapons are outdated america is producing lasers to take down small aircraft and missiles
phoenixbrown108 5 days ago
@2021marine China biggest manpower = still couldn't even invade USA with that alone as 90%+ would be wiped out trying to get their, by USA having like 15k+ planes and a big navy
Russia most nukes, USA, U.K and the other nuclear countries out their have enough to take out Russia or any country by their own nukes so no big deal. Drop 1 nuke in the centre of where all their nukes are and they're screwed
Britain + USA = Best trained troops + Best technology + NATO = unstoppable.
oiReWiin 5 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW
Doesn't matter. What DOES matter is who sits with the MONEY, and while the EU is going through serious problems with Greece, Ireland and Portugal, and soon possibly Italy and Spain and the US hardly can afford to wars they are involved in already in the Middle East, I wonder what planet you live on?
Stupid comments will always be flagged, and you're just some clown that plays videogames and doesn't even have a rudimentary understanding of world trade.
McLarenMercedes 4 days ago 3
@McLarenMercedes Britain was in problems in 1982 then Argentina attacked the falklands and britain still stood strong and stood tall and sent a fleet of 90+ Ships Carriers,Frigates,Destroyers and Supply Doesnt matter if your country is in dier needs, when theres a war your country has to stand tall and never show weakness Greece might be in debt badly yet there military is still strong trust me they've already ordered Subs from Germany, Frigates from Italy. PEACE WANKER
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 4 days ago
Why the UK? Referee?
Cyricist001 1 week ago
@Cyricist001 No i'm guessing UK being in it would be because a war like this would be ww3, just a thought.
oiReWiin 5 days ago
@oiReWiin Only if the UK involves Canada and Australia, alone it would be a 5 minute KO from Russia. The Brits were saved by Russians almost every time.Russia is the second largest weapons producer, has large quantity of resources (human and mineral), and Russian tech is as good as American if not better (only in military field). India, Australia and South America will be far more important then UK.- more resources. UK/USA cant absorb so much attrition damage.
Cyricist001 5 days ago
@Cyricist001 I'd pay £10,000,000 to see Russia gear up and get cross the channel and then take out Britain in 5 minutes. The Brits were not "saved by Russia almost every time" not even close, Russia is always supplying the enemy apart from the world wars but they didn't save Britain then. Russia tech is not "better then America". UK will be very important, you forget some of the weapons UK and USA have that would prove vital in a war, U.K and USA was the important ones in both world wars
oiReWiin 5 days ago
@oiReWiin O RLY? Have you perhaps looked at USA-Russian military tech and made a comparison? Russians have a inferior car design but in military technology they were always a excellent player. Both World wars ended half a century ago, Britain had an Empire then, now its only a small island, and with a Empire it still had to wait for the US and SSSR to push the Germans back since it could not. Same with Napoleon. 1 Nuke submarine in the North sea and the UK is in a pickle.
Cyricist001 4 days ago
@Cyricist001 Yes, it's a small island that could still kick most peoples asses apart from about 4 countries out there. " 1 nuke submarine and the UK is a pickle" don't really make sense but whatever. Who destroyed the German Luftwaffe and got air superiority? who sent the biggest amount of ships during D-DAY?. UK and USA were the main people in WW2 and don't underestimate Britain because of it's size......
oiReWiin 4 days ago
@oiReWiin ....ah yes..past glories...Destroyed the Luftwaffe is inaccurate, you defeated it but it was still alive and kicking until capitulation.Your ship "armada" was obsolete, those were merchant ships and warships since WW1. Without American help you would have starved, and D-Day was a fig-leaf in comparison to the Soviet operations like Uranus or Operation Zitadelle..The most important nations in WW2 were Germany - USSR and US-Japan.
Cyricist001 4 days ago
@Cyricist001 O dear so you're saying U.K wasn't an important nation during WW2, You're also saying D-DAY was a "fig-leaf". "You would have starved without USA" ??? You're a fucking moron, Take your I hate Britain and I think there army is shit, attitude somewhere else. I'm sick of twats like you trying to downgrade a great nation like Britain after all the men they lost helping others and defending themselves. You know NOTHING about the British military obviously.
oiReWiin 4 days ago
@oiReWiin Look this is not the history channel, UK was a superpower in the past, but its importance now is second rate. I don't give a damn about Britain, you can be a superpower for all I care, but the fact remains it would be of little importance against giants like US,Russia and China.
Cyricist001 4 days ago
@Cyricist001 and im sure thats what Persia thought about Macedon or Rome thought about Epirus or Argentina thought about britain. many times in history a bigger foe has underestimated a smaller country and have got there ass kicked for it. dont judge Britain by its size. our Airforce is still very strong, Our ships are still very strong and more advance then eithen america and you can search that up if u dont believe me. We might not have more stuff but we make it better then any1.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 4 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW ...you like old outdated examples don't you? And how would Britain attack Russia? Or would it wait until the US army arrives? Britain has the fewest military capable man, resources and land (less land, higher population density), if you think a Luftwaffe bombing on London was bad, you don't want to know what modern plains can transport (Tzar). If quality was enough to win wars, the Germans would rule Europa and Zulu would be unknown.Maid in Germany-the best.
Cyricist001 4 days ago
@Cyricist001 I Take it uve never heard of a Type 45 Destroyer? Britain has 6 there capable of targeting and destroying 1000 Targets small as Cricket balls moving 3 times speed of sound. Its the most advance Destroyer in the world and makes short work of any plane no matter how good it was designed to make planes useless and will do it with eas. Go ahead and Search Type 45 because ull be amazed by it.
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 4 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW Except a few thousand Topol missile launchers with nuke war heads...anti sub sonar?....UK,France,Germany etc are building to sonar "invisible submarines" but Type 45 has a sonar....interesting, is it for fishing?
Cyricist001 4 days ago
@Cyricist001 Ok you judge it my friend but when ww3 does happen which i personaly hope it doesnt coz it will just ruin the world :P when it does happen and Russian planes get blown up by a fleet of Type 45 destroyers near there coast ill make sure i come on here and say i told you so :) PEACE Now stop commenting to me im bored of this lol, ive made my point all russia anc china have is man power we own everything else
PyrrusOfEpirusTW 4 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW That is simply arrogant.
Cyricist001 3 days ago
@PyrrusOfEpirusTW ........arrogance...or ignorance?..hmmmm.
Cyricist001 3 days ago
@Cyricist001 its SONAR is much more advanced than anything russia has, its the absolute best in current technology, and i way ahead of current anti-SONAR tech.
GanzZulu 3 days ago
@GanzZulu ....yea....sure..
Cyricist001 3 days ago
@Cyricist001 what you don't seem to understand like several people here have stated, U.K has amazingly advanced stuff, they might not have the size but it's the stuff that counts. Would you rather 50 tooth picks or 20 knives? U.K when they use their military along side U.S.A are unstoppable
oiReWiin 4 days ago 8
@oiReWiin If they are poisoned tooth picks then yes. UK has helicopters, plains,tanks,subs and nukes so superior that they can outperform the Russian stuff when faced 20:1? what do they have regenerative shielding? For some reason people think that the Russian army has stopped advancing after the 80is. A question for you: what would you pick 1000 longbows or 100 muskets?
Cyricist001 4 days ago
@Cyricist001 That went straight over your head didn't it. Pick a country the same size as Britain, Britain would destroy them. The ONLY reason Britain couldn't beat Russia is because of the difference between numbers that is all. I never said Britain would beat them in a 1v1 i'm trying to get it into your head that they're not as shit as you make them sound.
oiReWiin 4 days ago
@oiReWiin ....Germany would lick the UK, probably France to, North and South Korea. My deepest apologies I thought that by the name of it UK would be fighting against Russia, but It seams the title is US=UK VS China+Italy.
Cyricist001 4 days ago
@Cyricist001 By the fact that Germany has the Treaty of Versailles and can't have a big military they would in now way "lick" U.K and if you meant north and south Korea could beat U.K too then you really need to step back in reality. I have no idea what the fuck this whole "China + Italy" shit is about. By the name of it U.K and USA would be fighting against Russia together and they have proven when they get together they are unstoppable.
oiReWiin 4 days ago
@oiReWiin Germany is the 3. largest arms producer in the world behind the US and Russia. They have more man power and high tech. It would be wise not to underestimate the Germans. If you don't get the sarcasm then best avoid talking to me, its my hobby.
Cyricist001 3 days ago
@Cyricist001 At what point does it say it will be a 1v1 against U.K and Russia??? it doesn't and as you keep going on about it being that way you need to read the title properly. Now seriously get the fuck out of here you know NOTHING. Your remarks are just the same old crap with no valid facts behind them, they are just a Very bias and disrespectful opinion toward to the U.K. Oh and fyi, Germany isn't even in top 10 military's now jog along little boy it's a school day tomorrow
oiReWiin 4 days ago
@oiReWiin It seams to me that from us two I'm defiantly not little :), and don't you worry about my school I already finished my college. HAHAHAHAH and you tell me I'm bias, if you read some of your comments you will see that you are not innocent on that front either.
Cyricist001 3 days ago
@Cyricist001 Yeah I'm bias, that's why I give credit to USA Russia and all the other countries that did well where you just sit here going on about Britain. I don't worry about your school education as anyone can finish college with no proper marks and little understanding of the course they just took. I appreciate all countries that do their part just not twats like you that feel the need to insult Britain with invalid facts and retarded opinions.
oiReWiin 3 days ago
@oiReWiin And how have I insulted Britain?
Cyricist001 3 days ago
@Cyricist001 when the UK is developing laser technology, electric "force field armour" invisibility cloaking technology, the FIST programs that will link the soldiers seemlessly to satellite GPS' and command quaters, rail guns, completely autonomous aircraft, more advanced missiles and targeting programs and so on. the US is the highest spender on military technology in the world, and the UK is the second highest, our kit will be too advanced for you to hanlde in a few years.
GanzZulu 3 days ago
@GanzZulu .....and you think that other countries wont research/steal that tech?
Cyricist001 3 days ago
@GanzZulu UK is 6th. USA is #1, People's Republic of China is #2, France is #3, Japan is #4, Germany is #5. I only got this from Wikipedia, however. Go to: /wiki/List_of_countries_by_level_of_military_equipment
George19881988 2 days ago
@George19881988 1U.S 2Russia 3China 4.India 5.U.K 6.Turkey 7.S,Korea 8.France 9.japan 10.Isreal 11.Brazil 12.iran/ 13.germany/ 14.taiwan/ 15.pakistan
falloutguy36 2 days ago 2
@Cyricist001 you could just as easily poison the knife, though. and the british have proven themselves countless times. like rorkes bridge, 132 men with muskets defeating 10,000 with spears.
in WW2 the soviet killed 1 german for every 15 soviets killed by the wehrmacht. the germans lost more men due to the russian winter by far...
GanzZulu 3 days ago
@GanzZulu Germans killed 5 Allies for 1 German to and guess what? They still lost the war. 12000 Zulu with pears vs 1200 Bits with guns at Islandwana, enough? "Quantity has a quality all its own." Joseph Stalin.
Cyricist001 3 days ago
@Cyricist001 i thought the zulu used spears, pears aren't a very good weapon i highly doubt they woulda used them!
mrrainman5ifty 3 days ago
@mrrainman5ifty You newer know, a fresh pear can drag Bruce Lee to the hospital kicking and screaming.Honestly - don't mess with pears, there nasty.
Cyricist001 3 days ago
@Cyricist001 Hmmmmm i see i have miss judged these tasty members of the fruit bowl i will not be so trusting of them in the future!
mrrainman5ifty 1 day ago
@mrrainman5ifty Yes, they are nasty but not invincible. I think figs can take them down, that's why God hate figs.
Cyricist001 14 hours ago
@oiReWiin Quantity, quality... all the technology in the world didn't prevented USA to fail spectacularly in Afghanistan, so there's no fail-proof doctrine when it comes to warfare.
M0d4qM7gCH8 3 days ago
amazing stuff...yeah land warrior ,smart bombs and drones will all work when and if Russia or Chine decides to fire a few bloody well aimed missiles at US sats, US has taken intelligence gathering to the extreme , but have made a tactical error, because they do not own space..or even sub orbital, its tactics and money, uk/usa may have 1, but not both
benjik17 2 days ago
@benjik17 Well to be honest, UK/USA has the tactics but then again, nothing comes close to the size of their navy or air force either, they are not just rubbish ships which is why they have so many, they are the most advanced ones as well, at least most of them are anyway
oiReWiin 2 days ago
Google ➨ MURDERED by the MONARCHS
nwo+freemason+illuminati+scientology+secretsociety+religion+ bohemiangrove+occult+government+constitution+zionist+slavery+
elitecriminals+politicians+war+etc = CAPITALIST REALM LANDLORD GRABBER PIG ROYAL LAZY FAMILY.
fight for LAST DROP BLOOD for MONEY & POWER = LAZY ROYAL PIG FAMILY
CAPITALISM = ROYAL SLAVE LORD MASTERS LAZY FAMILY.!!!
"GOD BURN the REALM LANDGRABBER PIG ROYAL LAZY FAMILY"
"GOD BURN ROYAL LAZY FAMILY"
►► copy& paste WE ARE THE 99% FREEMAN ◄◄
koppellhinex 2 days ago
@koppellhinex What
oiReWiin 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CAPITALISM creates ELITE CRIMINALS. BANKERS. DRUG LORDS. INEQUALITY. INSECURITY. GREED. RUTHLESS COMMUNISM. NWO. NAZI. TERRORISM. LAZY PEOPLE. REBEL POLITICIAN. ANARCHY. worst is WAR etc. etc.. ☠ ☢ ☠ ☢ ☠ ☢ ☠
CAPITALISM was designed only for CORRUPT OPPORTUNISTIC MANIPULATIVE LAZY POLITICIAN. BANKERS. LAWYERS. DRUG LORDS. JUDGES. CRIMINALS. DICTATORS. RULERS. KING. SULTANATE. EMPEROR etc..
HARD WORKING PEACE LOVING HAPPY HONEST SOCIETY were always the slave victim and poorly starve to death. :(
koppellhinex 1 day ago
@koppellhinex you sound crazy... i cant sto