Sure, telephoto, but I’d say she is pretty darn close anyway. The time between mainstage, and when the sound of it reaches where she is, seems to be about 2 ½ seconds. That makes it somewhere in the range of about ½ mile. You couldn’t do that here.
Ok, a few +thousand+ metres from the launch. But apart from that the reporter is refreshingly well-informed. And given that English is not her first language she's extremely fluent.
hhahaha does she have any clue as to how dangerous what she did was?
There is a solid....solid...solid reason why rocket pads are 100's of miles away from anything with absolutely nothing around it as far as the eye can see.
i may be ignorant here, but i gotta ask..why is it that at launch phase american space shuttles leave such a big trail of smoke behind, whilst russian space rockets barely make any..? but the better question would be..why aren't the americans using the same type of fuel that russians use? it looks less polluting, at least..
@L20Nardi Well smoke does not mean toxic, but your correct somewhat. Russian uses RP-1 (a refined kerosene) that is highly toxic and carcinogenic and welll as unstable. The shuttle used Ammonium Perchlorate Composite Propellant (APCP) while both are not good for you the U.S. was somewhat better health wise. But remember this was just to get off the ground, both used Oxygen as the fuel once it hit 150,000 feet (about 52 miles) and the boosters drops away.
@rickcain2320 4.4G's is the maximum G's they sustain and that's in the first few minutes of flight, after that it drops off substationally. partially because well... your getting farther away from the earth, so less of a backwards tug on your body while your accerating.. if you get what i'm saying?
I always thought they endured way more then 4g's what with the huge rockets strapped to there asses and because that is only about 1x the amount you sustain on the wildest roller coasters
0:39 did you notice how nervously that space tourist where staring at newspaper? He was probably thinking "Holy shit this is something unreal, I am flying to a fucking space aaahhh"
You can be as close to the blue screen as you want and still not get burned by what is pictured there! Love the fans blowing her hair and her not knowing where to look.
Nobody actually sends reporters anywhere anymore. When CNN pulled the desert storm stunt with Charles Jaco (cheap set not blue screen), they knew they had a winner.
Only we, the public that depends on a truthful, free press, get screwed.
@trisky1234 How I wish the victors did not have the habit of destroying the literature from before they were victorious! There versions of history truly stink.
Do you remember the idea behind the book "5 days of the condor" (3 days for the movie)? Have you ever had a chance to watch the analyses of movies that tell us exactly what we are now experiencing?
"minority report" for example?
It is fascinating.
Anyway, I feel a strong need to restore the 1st amendment by breaking up media.
@USAmerican100 The rocket is a Soyuz-FG which has a height of 49.5m (162 feet). At 2000m away, it would have an angular size of about 1.4 degrees.
The rocket appears to be 1.2 feet high relative to the reporter, If we assume the camera is 3-8 feet away from the reporter, then the angle is between 8 and 23 degrees. And using the small angle formula, the distance is between 150-350 meters away.
So the speed of sound is slower in Russia? You can see engines start up at 1 second (smoke at the pad), you hear the sound at 5-6 seconds. Speed of sound is about 343 meters per second.
@USAmerican100 Based on the sound delay, she is 600-900 meters from the launch pad. You can't see when exactly engines start at all, you can only guess. You can clearly hear noise from engines already hissing from the start of the video and reaching it's peak at the take off moment. If you refer to the smoke then it's about 2-3 sec before the sound gets to the camera, but no way 5-6 seconds as you are trying to state here.
Actually Guy was lucky. There was a technical problem on launch that resulted in a near catastrophe. There are three stages to the turbo pump system that the Soyuz rocket uses. The pumps are cycled by the action of the combustion itself. Here the pumps produced too much flow of fuel and liquid oxygen. The lift off had too much thrust. The system luckily corrected itself. Hence the conversation between the crew and mission control.
@dvh065 Soyuz uses RP-1/Lox for fuel, so it's not going to "smoke" like a rocket that uses, say, monomethyl hydrazine/nitrogen tetroxide. Perhaps, it's because the launch facility doesn't use a water buffer at the pad the way NASA does with it's more powerful engines.
@VlaXXie Then you'd really like the Chinese rockets, find a vid of Shenzhou 7 launching, it looks like a toy rocket on a toy launch pad, and lights up and takes off looking like a miniature in an effects shot. :D no disrespect intended, it seems a good rocket
@notredamehesamighty she's not as close as it seems.. the aperture setting on the camera just makes it look that way. And there was probably a bunker right behind the camera they could get into if there was a problem
@dimesach Yes, the Soyuz burns kerosene and liquid-oxygen, which makes mostly water vapor and carbon-dioxide. Space shuttle boosters burned stuff that makes a lot of smoke (ammonium perchlorate, aluminum powder, iron oxide, and epoxy-polymer binder). The shuttle itself burned liquid-hydrogen and liquid-oxygen, which makes a water-vapor exhaust trail but without any actual smoke. AFAIK all Soyuz stages burn kerosene, except the upper stage sometimes burns hydrazine which also makes little smoke.
@crumcon Yeah, we need a proper war to start building shit like that. Ok so i was being sarcastic but have you ever noticed the advances in technology when were scared of somebody? Think cold war.
It is easy to figure out that she is about 2km from the pad, if you time the lag between what you see and the arrival of sound. Given the difference in vehicle size and energy, the NASA minimum safe distance of 3 miles is comparable. She is getting visual and audio signals from her crew about what is about to happen (monitor in her right ear). Excellent TV reporting.
Damn I wish I was just a few years older than her, built like an olympic gymnast, rich, smart, funny, and her partner on some semester-long college project.
@faisaly96 What are you talking about, we evolved from the primordial soup on our own right over this piece of land, and owe no credit to anybody. That fact we have a language that sounds similar to British is just a coincidence, like when Kirk showed up on another planet and everyone there looked human and spoke English.
:D
I was in an argument with a lady (American) who was arguing against the idea that all Americans are descended from immigrants and that our language came from Europe.
....so being an astronaut comes down to being able to pay your own way?
So Alphonse “Al” Capone, Bonnie Parker and George “Bugs” Moran could have flown rockets if gangsters of their day could have had that available to get their kicks? I megga Coney Island ride?
Humanity is screwed if sick-O pervert inbreeds are the only ones left to fly. We won't even be making it across the street as a species, much less to the stars.
I don't know why, but Gayane's reporting just seems so funny that she makes me laugh. "They want a separate Soyuz for tourists. We don't know when it's gonna happen or if it's gonna happen, but we do know, if it happens, the flights there are gonna cost much more than they do now." It's the way she says it as much as what she says. "They cont babysit space tourists out there!"
Amazing how loud those suckers are. Guess listening to Apollo launches again, and noticing the lack of rocket noise, and vibration-free APOLLONUT transmissions is not necessary for blind NASA LOVERS!
@un4g1v3n1 I guess you believe the moon landing is false, huh? Just so you know, Apollo 11 left sensors on the moon and we can fire signals at them and have them returned. So it's undoubted that the moon landing is real.
@Dylanforlife Educate yourself Dylan...Russians returned laser signals from the moon, off the bare surface in 62. MIT did it in 63. Nothing is required to bounce a laser signal off the moon. You've been hoodwinked pal. Not to worry though. So has the majority of the world. Ignorance is the most prominent enemy of TRUTH!
@LarS1963 Listen to the voices of Apollonots...If you dont want to understand the simple fact that NO ENGINE NOISE from the ANOT side of TRANSMISSION is kind of WEIRD...then MAYBE their vibration-free voices during a rocket launch will clue you in. ASSUMING that missions to the MOON are true, based on the fact someone TOLD YOU THEY ARE REAL, or showed you LAME VIDEOS of lunar rompings....then you'll be even more easily fooled on other matters! MIND EXPERIMENT...those who believe, FAILED!
Ask yourself this question: IF the lunar landings are FAKE, and YOU and those LIKEMINDED have access to FACTS that it is so, then how come that the SOVJET UNION did not find these facts and PUBLISH them? Why did the SOVJET UNION not put forward this evidence? There was a COLD WAR going on, and I am CERTAIN that Breshnev would have LOVED smear Nixon's with MUD. However, he NEVER DID? WHY is that?
B.t.w. Using capitals in this manner is infantile.
@LarS1963 The Soviets were faking space missions to extort billions from their citizens as well...In the meantime, they , like US, built up their nuclear arsenals, and financed black ops technology....Now, if you want to live in your mind-controlled, sheeple state, believing governments around the world are really running the show, so be it...As for me I prefer the truth. Making me a truth-seeker, not conspiracy theorist....And making you a goddamned, gullibe dupe! Enjoy your ignorance!
@un4g1v3n1 Yes, because I believe that the lunar-stones broght back to earth are real, because I refuse to believe you can create a deception on such a scale without proof coming out that it was all fake, because I have yet to see you or any of your likeminded conspiracy-theorists produce a shred of evidence that confirm your theories are right; I am a goddamned gullible dupe...
I am aware that goverments lie, cheat and fake. But they don't do it always.
@LarS1963 "stones broght back to earth are real" Ask the DUTCH about their STONE...er...PETRIFIED WOOD. "refuse to believe" No, all you are doing is what a child does when they are first told SANTA isn't real. You are upset that you've been duped, and wish to avoid feeling like a fool! "proof coming out that it was all fake" The proof of the fraud has been coming out since PRIOR to the missions. Baron died for it! As did the Apollo 1 crew! "But they don't do it always" ;) ya, right!
I am terrible sorry, but I have no reason to act as a child does when told Santa isn't real.
Because, it will take a lot more than your ramblings to convince me I am wrong. I happen to have lived in the Netherlands, and I know rather a lot about your piece of "petrified wood". You can believe what you want, and I will stick to the facts. When you have proof to provide, please send it to Rolling Stone or another independant magazine, they will love it.
@LarS1963 "I am terrible sorry" The first accurate statement you have made. Although it's your logical/critical skills that are sorry.
Don't take my ramblings....Watch videos by myself, and my friend Jarrah White. Or just watch rare footage like launches of Saturn V's during Apollo missions. Listen to the voices of the actornots...Then, USE CRITICAL, LOGICAL THINKING SKILLS. Remember, reindeer can't fly, and voiceboxes can't be vibration-free during a ROCKET LAUNCH. WAKE UP!
@LarS1963 Have you ever heard of the pendulum experiment done on Apollo 14? It is on video and the moon gravitational force was calculated from this and corresponds within 5% from the true value and it is as expected much, much lower than the earth gravitational force. This experiment is something one can not duplicate on earth - not even with trick photography with the astronauts moving while the experiment is going. Nice try, no cigar.
No I haven't heard of it, although it sounds interesting. Why don't you pass this bit of interesting tidbit on to un4g1v3n1? Because, if you care to go back and actually read the posts, you will notice that I at no point claim that the moonlandings were fake. Rather on the contrary. ;)
That aside, where can I read more about this experiment?
@un4g1v3n1 Sorry, did you say petrified wood? Are you seriously suggesting that nasa faked moonrocks with petrified wood? The single rock available on earth that is LEAST FUCKING LIKELY to fool anyone ever? Do you seriously think anybody has ever been stupid enough to try and pass off petrified wood as a moon rock? Your info is terrible, and your acceptance of it shows the blindest confirmation bias I've ever seen.
@TBuckleyBrain Google FAKE MOON ROCK...OR DUTCH MOON ROCK...Then let the mind fucking come to an end for you! Also google VON BRAUN trip to antarctica...ya...in 67, two years before Apollo 11....collecting MOON ROCKS...Yeah!
Then try googling RADIOACTIVE MOON....KILLER ELECTRONS...and start the awakening process..Or stay mind-fucked....It is your mind, and you have the right to be deluded if you wish!
@un4g1v3n1 "Durrr it's on the internet, it must be true!!!!!! Durrrrrrrrrr...." I don't usually trust the daily mail anyway, but even assuming it was true, it seems like someone pulled one over on the dutch prime minister, not the freaking world. Also, just because antarctica looks like the moon doesn't mean it does at a molecular level. And everyone knew the astronauts were exposed to radiation. Their total radiation exposure was under 5 rem. They were still inside earth's magnetosphere.
@TBuckleyBrain "They were still inside earth's magnetosphere." Durr.....The Moon is well past the Earth's MAGNETOSPHERE. So, I take it by this statement that you are aware of the fraud as well. That or you are an idiot. Which is it?
The Russian rockets are very reliable but nothing is 100% in this world. Good thing this video isn't tagged Fried Reporter Metres From Launch Pad!
johnnyrocksable 18 hours ago
00:30 - они бы еще автомобильную "елочку" повесили.
RetiredNihilist 23 hours ago
It sounded like farts in the start :P
higgarn43 1 day ago
Advertising!
Thumbs down
hkostal 1 day ago
Sure, telephoto, but I’d say she is pretty darn close anyway. The time between mainstage, and when the sound of it reaches where she is, seems to be about 2 ½ seconds. That makes it somewhere in the range of about ½ mile. You couldn’t do that here.
hammeredinfire 2 days ago
hey bb, that my rocket for you, ride it up lol
rainstars1 2 days ago
is she from bosnia or something??
eb62224 5 days ago
what are u talking about?! she is like my dick !!
parna1383 6 days ago
The reporter is a dog and the Canadian is a fool/tool...and I'm an embarrassed Canadian.
clusterfak 1 week ago
noise of a silent woman is defeaning!
acerkiwi 1 week ago
Ok, a few +thousand+ metres from the launch. But apart from that the reporter is refreshingly well-informed. And given that English is not her first language she's extremely fluent.
chap666ish 1 week ago
It's called standing far away from the camera at high zoom. Try "kilometers".
danieldeibler 1 week ago
I'd love to get to tape a launch from that close. Girl not bad either
proaudiohd 1 week ago
the things i would do to her
MegaGreendayfan101 1 week ago
top 2 comments --> fucking pervs LOL
MrTehShit 1 week ago 2
billionaires......is there anything that they dont want to do
haha
ricodelta1 2 weeks ago
она страшненькая
TheVovano 3 weeks ago
hhahaha does she have any clue as to how dangerous what she did was?
There is a solid....solid...solid reason why rocket pads are 100's of miles away from anything with absolutely nothing around it as far as the eye can see.
ganymedeIV4 3 weeks ago
i may be ignorant here, but i gotta ask..why is it that at launch phase american space shuttles leave such a big trail of smoke behind, whilst russian space rockets barely make any..? but the better question would be..why aren't the americans using the same type of fuel that russians use? it looks less polluting, at least..
L20Nardi 3 weeks ago
@L20Nardi Well smoke does not mean toxic, but your correct somewhat. Russian uses RP-1 (a refined kerosene) that is highly toxic and carcinogenic and welll as unstable. The shuttle used Ammonium Perchlorate Composite Propellant (APCP) while both are not good for you the U.S. was somewhat better health wise. But remember this was just to get off the ground, both used Oxygen as the fuel once it hit 150,000 feet (about 52 miles) and the boosters drops away.
candr 3 weeks ago
@candr thanks, i didn't expect such a detailed answer, it fully helped :)
L20Nardi 3 weeks ago
@L20Nardi except it's a load of tosh.
alexinshade 1 week ago
Only on RT. A rocket is lifting off to space. What does the camera continue to show? The hot chick.
ryanisflyboy 3 weeks ago
i want to tweak her nipples
doh1959 3 weeks ago
Her daugthers will have cancer.
RayKalmNiam 4 weeks ago
whoa she hasn't visted the rocket disaster portion of youtube before has she?
I wouldn't be within 5 miles of any rocket of that caliber if i'm not inside a concrete and steel bunker thats buried underground.
ganymedeIV4 1 month ago
They have a lion toy hanging in there xD
TH7596 1 month ago
@TH7596 yeah. and when the lion starts floating.
xllenz 1 month ago
what a fatass astronaut
hexlec2010 1 month ago
I wonder what the G-force is, around 6 or 7? Thats gotta feel like a bear is sitting on your chest.
rickcain2320 1 month ago
@rickcain2320 4.4G's is the maximum G's they sustain and that's in the first few minutes of flight, after that it drops off substationally. partially because well... your getting farther away from the earth, so less of a backwards tug on your body while your accerating.. if you get what i'm saying?
I always thought they endured way more then 4g's what with the huge rockets strapped to there asses and because that is only about 1x the amount you sustain on the wildest roller coasters
but nope!
ganymedeIV4 1 month ago
meters away?...she would have already been a BBQ!
maxxbad17 1 month ago
i want to pull her pants down
doh1959 1 month ago 25
about 180 decibels is a bit noisy.
theslashmetal 1 month ago
0:39 did you notice how nervously that space tourist where staring at newspaper? He was probably thinking "Holy shit this is something unreal, I am flying to a fucking space aaahhh"
temich1985 1 month ago
ooohhhh gayane... i love u :D
ktabraiz 1 month ago
Might as well have been driving, pretty much oblivious.
Korgon2013 1 month ago
You can be as close to the blue screen as you want and still not get burned by what is pictured there! Love the fans blowing her hair and her not knowing where to look.
Nobody actually sends reporters anywhere anymore. When CNN pulled the desert storm stunt with Charles Jaco (cheap set not blue screen), they knew they had a winner.
Only we, the public that depends on a truthful, free press, get screwed.
CNN911Fakes 1 month ago
@CNN911Fakes lucky for us, we have brains and libraries and the internet and the ability to compare news streams to literature.
trisky1234 1 month ago
@trisky1234 How I wish the victors did not have the habit of destroying the literature from before they were victorious! There versions of history truly stink.
Do you remember the idea behind the book "5 days of the condor" (3 days for the movie)? Have you ever had a chance to watch the analyses of movies that tell us exactly what we are now experiencing?
"minority report" for example?
It is fascinating.
Anyway, I feel a strong need to restore the 1st amendment by breaking up media.
CNN911Fakes 1 month ago
hahaha great reporting there !!
MrYerka12 2 months ago
Yes we could really feel the overload, but things are back to normal now.
Lol, normal being what like 5gs of acceleration. hehe
cjeam9199 2 months ago
Crazy girl
Soligorsk235 2 months ago
Stuck in space for months with an annoying clown? No thanks
FetidToecheese 2 months ago
1:07 so this is who we send to space....no wonder world will end....
JanisevDenvil 2 months ago
this reportuer is really really HOT!!
constantmotionish 2 months ago 42
@constantmotionish
so hot that you can't even spell...
mastersgta1 2 months ago
@mastersgta1 LOL ya..the right one is reporteur..
constantmotionish 1 month ago
@constantmotionish :/
dany080 2 months ago
@constantmotionish below average. but depends where u live maybe
arczi68 1 month ago
@constantmotionish
You need to see an eye doctor.
USAmerican100 1 month ago
@USAmerican100 hahaha LOL..
constantmotionish 1 month ago
@constantmotionish hell yes she is. :)
xXDEICIDE216Xx 1 month ago
@constantmotionish fugly, ur gay
1Nekit1 1 month ago
@constantmotionish wish she would help me blast off my rocket
PlebScrubber 2 weeks ago
@constantmotionish are we looking at the same reporter?
buddyisreal23 2 weeks ago
@constantmotionish fuck go and buy new bionoculars ;)
elveezultra 1 week ago
@constantmotionish she is really ugly-ugly jew
RetiredNihilist 23 hours ago
2:05 yeah real professional
Frankeinstein127 2 months ago
Comment removed
Frankeinstein127 2 months ago
Comment removed
Frankeinstein127 2 months ago
Impressive. Must be loud.
ntt688 2 months ago
the cameraman could be far from her, and using a superzoom, making it look that both she and the rocket are near each other.
you can do that with people and the moon for example.
rogerpenna 2 months ago
She´s hot!
TheSRalston 2 months ago
What the heck is that over their heads? Looks like a typical camping weekend, lol...
TheSRalston 2 months ago
How on earth she can NOT watch the Blast off?????
kkrass1 2 months ago
reporter is hot
RetardGenius 2 months ago
Not an American rocket, so who cares
dhbiza 2 months ago
@dhbiza lol they wont care for a long time since they will be no american rocket in a wild LOL
juanlmesl 2 months ago
@juanlmesl ??? in a wild????
dhbiza 2 months ago
@dhbiza in a long time
juanlmesl 2 months ago
Come on Russian all space is in your control .!!
Show time, show the world you can do more than other country to mess space.!!
0172shane 2 months ago
Reporter ♥
babaaj 2 months ago
ITS A LION Hangin!
HajtomY 2 months ago
man, that's a smooth launch. Al those american vehicles produce a lot of smoke and stuff, this one doesn't, just a cute flame!
CtBeke 2 months ago
Looks like Rachel Weisz's ugly little sister.
MrDenizen 2 months ago
lol american canadian and russian together is that modern warfare 4?
superman6327 2 months ago
What rocket?
ColorfulPhotography 2 months ago
what? the rocket took off? i didnt even notice. i got distracted.
rax7 3 months ago
She's hot!
wayne11122000 3 months ago
Chriss de cave Laliberté !!!
Yogakayakmayak 3 months ago
0:37 I'll translate "next time were paying the extra $150 to upgrade our seats"
godscuttingyoudown 3 months ago
Based on the sound delay, she is about 2 km from the launch pad.
USAmerican100 3 months ago 35
@USAmerican100 The rocket is a Soyuz-FG which has a height of 49.5m (162 feet). At 2000m away, it would have an angular size of about 1.4 degrees.
The rocket appears to be 1.2 feet high relative to the reporter, If we assume the camera is 3-8 feet away from the reporter, then the angle is between 8 and 23 degrees. And using the small angle formula, the distance is between 150-350 meters away.
ronpaulbot 2 months ago
@ronpaulbot
So the speed of sound is slower in Russia? You can see engines start up at 1 second (smoke at the pad), you hear the sound at 5-6 seconds. Speed of sound is about 343 meters per second.
USAmerican100 2 months ago
@USAmerican100 c/mon buddy, use American units, not those damn french metric units.
dhbiza 1 month ago
@USAmerican100 Let's try with topography? How tall is that rocket? :)
Zukhov1945 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALERT: DRUGLORDS is COUNTERFEITING MONEY for SLAVERY..!!!
ALERT: DRUGLORDS is COUNTERFEITING MONEY for SLAVERY..!!!
CAPITALISM = WORLDS FAKE ECONOMY..!!!
CAPITALISM = WORLDS FAKE ECONOMY..!!!
CAPITALISM = WORLDS FAKE ECONOMY..!!!
GOVERNMENT+DRUGLORDS+CRIMINALS = DIRTY CAPITALIST SCUM
GOVERNMENT+DRUGLORDS+CRIMINALS = DIRTY CAPITALIST SCUM
HARD WORKING PEACE LOVING HAPPY HONEST SOCIETY were always the slave victim and poorly starve to death. :(
kopellhinex 1 month ago
@USAmerican100 Based on the sound delay, she is 600-900 meters from the launch pad. You can't see when exactly engines start at all, you can only guess. You can clearly hear noise from engines already hissing from the start of the video and reaching it's peak at the take off moment. If you refer to the smoke then it's about 2-3 sec before the sound gets to the camera, but no way 5-6 seconds as you are trying to state here.
chicslt 3 weeks ago
Soviet old baby ! I love
bai0089 3 months ago
Actually Guy was lucky. There was a technical problem on launch that resulted in a near catastrophe. There are three stages to the turbo pump system that the Soyuz rocket uses. The pumps are cycled by the action of the combustion itself. Here the pumps produced too much flow of fuel and liquid oxygen. The lift off had too much thrust. The system luckily corrected itself. Hence the conversation between the crew and mission control.
sbcwinn 3 months ago
Please!! Saw off her hand!!!
Excelentz 3 months ago
"here is the moment of truth....so instead of keeping quiet I'll shout loudly and wave my hand annoyingly in front of the camera"
Gary190tube 3 months ago
I didn`t understand a word she said, I was just hoping to see her tits
KeskinTRS 3 months ago
and shes ugly too her forehead is square,she wouldent of dared stand that close to the mighty saturn five
guitarnashelter 3 months ago
@guitarnashelter it's not a saturn 5
pierceys234 3 months ago
@pierceys234 i know that u moron jesus what planet u from
guitarnashelter 3 months ago
@guitarnashelter you just said that was a Saturn 5
pierceys234 3 months ago
@guitarnashelter Says the fat nerd
TOO UGLY WULDNT BANG
Vamutus 3 months ago
this doesn't look real
Unclesamslair 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
台灣登山服務中心
510 Changhua County Yuanlin Township泉洲巷 0920 608 383
n0920608383 3 months ago
Whats she doing out of the kitchen?
BADDOOKUS 3 months ago
@BADDOOKUS That's mean!
Please. Don't be mean, to the sweet Russ lady.
centurion180ad 3 months ago
The shitting cult savage is wearing a Christanic death cross. What an insane shitting cult moron.
NotSoOldHippy 3 months ago
if she was that distance from the saturn v she would of been burned to a crisp
guitarnashelter 3 months ago
@guitarnashelter i doubt it dude.... took the sound like 2 or 3 seconds 2 reach her... no chance u would be burnt even by the saturn 5 rocket
AJAnewage 3 months ago
@AJAnewage are you kidding it would of blew her away you idiot
guitarnashelter 3 months ago
Frog Eyed Bitch.
Lol what is wrong with you guys haha !
xBloodXGusherx 3 months ago
That is a very annoying button. Specifically, the tensile strength of the thread that is holding that button on is very annoying.
riderpoet 3 months ago
Oh! There was a launch????
TrueCourse 3 months ago
great video clip although if she was twice that distance from an Apollo launch she might not have survived
MightySaturn5 3 months ago
I would tap that to infinity and beyond.
stalkingalizee 4 months ago
1:05 Oh Canadian, you so silly!
Bronyforever 4 months ago
That's a big rocket that carry cosmonauts but very little smokes at launch pad?
dvh065 4 months ago
@dvh065 Soyuz uses RP-1/Lox for fuel, so it's not going to "smoke" like a rocket that uses, say, monomethyl hydrazine/nitrogen tetroxide. Perhaps, it's because the launch facility doesn't use a water buffer at the pad the way NASA does with it's more powerful engines.
Postie218 3 months ago
@VlaXXie Then you'd really like the Chinese rockets, find a vid of Shenzhou 7 launching, it looks like a toy rocket on a toy launch pad, and lights up and takes off looking like a miniature in an effects shot. :D no disrespect intended, it seems a good rocket
malamagr 4 months ago
My God... that reporter is way too close to that rocket blast off. What if there had been a malfunction? What if the rocket had to be aborted?
notredamehesamighty 4 months ago 2
@notredamehesamighty she's not as close as it seems.. the aperture setting on the camera just makes it look that way. And there was probably a bunker right behind the camera they could get into if there was a problem
KingNast 3 months ago
@notredamehesamighty It's not an American rocket, so relax. Russian rockets are much safer.
copehaha 2 months ago
@reventon65000 What tits?
HandicappedWalrus 4 months ago
OPTICAL ILLUSION: normal people will see the reporters tits....but if you look closely in the background there is a rocket taking off
reventon65000 4 months ago 90
@reventon65000 Rocket? What rocket?
2014cwajts71 4 months ago
@reventon65000 By the way, just how close was that wench to the launchpad?
openminded1313 3 months ago
@reventon65000 LOL I split my gut laughing!!!!!
skyprop 3 months ago
@reventon65000 OMG your RIGHT!
KlunkerRider 3 months ago
@reventon65000 - All I see are these funny little men climbing up and down the steps. M.C. Escher.
7855waldo 2 months ago
@reventon65000 what tits?
rhn94 2 months ago
@reventon65000 nah i dont see it
RokkerBoyy 2 months ago
Why doesn't the Soyuz produce huge vapor trails? Does it burn a different fuel than the Space Shuttle?
dimesach 4 months ago
@dimesach EXCELLENT QUESTION! That's always bothered me for years!
NewChicago 4 months ago
@dimesach Yes, the Soyuz burns kerosene and liquid-oxygen, which makes mostly water vapor and carbon-dioxide. Space shuttle boosters burned stuff that makes a lot of smoke (ammonium perchlorate, aluminum powder, iron oxide, and epoxy-polymer binder). The shuttle itself burned liquid-hydrogen and liquid-oxygen, which makes a water-vapor exhaust trail but without any actual smoke. AFAIK all Soyuz stages burn kerosene, except the upper stage sometimes burns hydrazine which also makes little smoke.
malamagr 4 months ago
I bet if the rocket had blown up on the launchpad it would have still burnt her ass.
2JAMMY 4 months ago
Мы должны думать о лучшем мире друг с другом. Это единственный способ ...
juliobell 4 months ago
looks like we have still some time to go to catch up to Star Trek kind of spaceship.
Just imagine what human can achieve if all the money on wars going into research for spaceships!!!
crumcon 4 months ago 28
@crumcon Not a star-trek like ship, those are pure fantasy. Luckily for us, a real starship would be much, much cooler than a disk and tubes. :D
IzackN 2 months ago
@crumcon Maybe we could go to mars. That's about it. Star Trek sort of technology is far, far off into the future assuming that it's even possible.
OMGtehWINNAR 2 months ago
@crumcon Yeah, we need a proper war to start building shit like that. Ok so i was being sarcastic but have you ever noticed the advances in technology when were scared of somebody? Think cold war.
Antifaith29 2 months ago
@crumcon and im assuming while we're putting all our money into research magical leprechauns give us food?
chooseit2 2 months ago
@crumcon The most sensible comment I have ever seen on YT. Well done. Oh and I agree with you 100%.
handsfan 2 months ago
I'm metres away too: approximately 7,818,000.
KittySN 4 months ago
that canadian has eaten to much snow
TheJaaysog 4 months ago
HOLY CRAP! I faved this video 2 months ago and I just now realized there is a rocket launching in the background! ;)
greenseaships 4 months ago
It is easy to figure out that she is about 2km from the pad, if you time the lag between what you see and the arrival of sound. Given the difference in vehicle size and energy, the NASA minimum safe distance of 3 miles is comparable. She is getting visual and audio signals from her crew about what is about to happen (monitor in her right ear). Excellent TV reporting.
awuma 4 months ago
Damn I wish I was just a few years older than her, built like an olympic gymnast, rich, smart, funny, and her partner on some semester-long college project.
malamagr 4 months ago
That's a REALLY bad idea to be that close. If for some reason the rocket malfunctions and explodes you're completely fucked.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 5 months ago
@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD It's not an atomic bomb dude...
TheRaven0us 4 months ago
@TheRaven0us Doesn't have to be an atomic bomb for there to be shrapnel falling everywhere.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 4 months ago
Tits or no, I will marry her ass on the tarmac if she wants to be American. After all, we rule!
cybermarsactual 5 months ago
@cybermarsactual
HAHA! you rule? you just disbanded your space shuttle program, and now Russia is the only country capable of sending people to the ISS!
You country is on the verge of collapse! Russia is on the rise and America is falling into poverty and debt.
Why would anyone want to be an American they are all fat greedy diseased people with no culture except for Mcdonalds and cocacola bullshit
CEMABOIKOV 4 months ago
Why do women display there bust like that,
-and then get angry with us when we notice?
agwhitaker 5 months ago
Fuck america . Viva Russia !! Att LEast the American people aren't in fact american .. they'r European
faisaly96 5 months ago
@faisaly96 What are you talking about, we evolved from the primordial soup on our own right over this piece of land, and owe no credit to anybody. That fact we have a language that sounds similar to British is just a coincidence, like when Kirk showed up on another planet and everyone there looked human and spoke English.
:D
I was in an argument with a lady (American) who was arguing against the idea that all Americans are descended from immigrants and that our language came from Europe.
malamagr 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
christ, I wish I was a brought up as a russian spacerocket engineer, unlike wasting my life. Western life sucks.
yippitydodah 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
now that is what you call a cracking set of engins. Did you see the intense load of power concerntrated underneath her?
yippitydodah 5 months ago
isnt that kind of close for her to stand there
skateboy159 5 months ago
....so being an astronaut comes down to being able to pay your own way?
So Alphonse “Al” Capone, Bonnie Parker and George “Bugs” Moran could have flown rockets if gangsters of their day could have had that available to get their kicks? I megga Coney Island ride?
Humanity is screwed if sick-O pervert inbreeds are the only ones left to fly. We won't even be making it across the street as a species, much less to the stars.
centurion180ad 5 months ago
I don't know why, but Gayane's reporting just seems so funny that she makes me laugh. "They want a separate Soyuz for tourists. We don't know when it's gonna happen or if it's gonna happen, but we do know, if it happens, the flights there are gonna cost much more than they do now." It's the way she says it as much as what she says. "They cont babysit space tourists out there!"
Pooua 5 months ago
to be honest, i clicked this vid to see the beautiful reporter, not the rocket..
pedropablo316 5 months ago
to be honest, i clicked this vid to see the beautiful reporter, not the rockets..
pedropablo316 5 months ago
I'll miss rockets like these when they start using aircraft that can be flown off the runway and into space. I wonder how long until that happens.
KaTzaNdSTuFf 5 months ago
Amazing how loud those suckers are. Guess listening to Apollo launches again, and noticing the lack of rocket noise, and vibration-free APOLLONUT transmissions is not necessary for blind NASA LOVERS!
un4g1v3n1 5 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 I guess you believe the moon landing is false, huh? Just so you know, Apollo 11 left sensors on the moon and we can fire signals at them and have them returned. So it's undoubted that the moon landing is real.
Dylanforlife 5 months ago
@Dylanforlife Educate yourself Dylan...Russians returned laser signals from the moon, off the bare surface in 62. MIT did it in 63. Nothing is required to bounce a laser signal off the moon. You've been hoodwinked pal. Not to worry though. So has the majority of the world. Ignorance is the most prominent enemy of TRUTH!
un4g1v3n1 5 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 Calling me by my name scares me. Also, I WANT TO BELIEVE!
Dylanforlife 5 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 I am not certain what it is you try to say.
But if you are trying to tell us that the Soyuz makes more noise than the Saturn V did, then you are most asurredly wrong.
LarS1963 5 months ago
@LarS1963 Listen to the voices of Apollonots...If you dont want to understand the simple fact that NO ENGINE NOISE from the ANOT side of TRANSMISSION is kind of WEIRD...then MAYBE their vibration-free voices during a rocket launch will clue you in. ASSUMING that missions to the MOON are true, based on the fact someone TOLD YOU THEY ARE REAL, or showed you LAME VIDEOS of lunar rompings....then you'll be even more easily fooled on other matters! MIND EXPERIMENT...those who believe, FAILED!
un4g1v3n1 5 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 Ohhh.... A conspiracy theorist. :D
Ask yourself this question: IF the lunar landings are FAKE, and YOU and those LIKEMINDED have access to FACTS that it is so, then how come that the SOVJET UNION did not find these facts and PUBLISH them? Why did the SOVJET UNION not put forward this evidence? There was a COLD WAR going on, and I am CERTAIN that Breshnev would have LOVED smear Nixon's with MUD. However, he NEVER DID? WHY is that?
B.t.w. Using capitals in this manner is infantile.
LarS1963 5 months ago
@LarS1963 The Soviets were faking space missions to extort billions from their citizens as well...In the meantime, they , like US, built up their nuclear arsenals, and financed black ops technology....Now, if you want to live in your mind-controlled, sheeple state, believing governments around the world are really running the show, so be it...As for me I prefer the truth. Making me a truth-seeker, not conspiracy theorist....And making you a goddamned, gullibe dupe! Enjoy your ignorance!
un4g1v3n1 5 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 Yes, because I believe that the lunar-stones broght back to earth are real, because I refuse to believe you can create a deception on such a scale without proof coming out that it was all fake, because I have yet to see you or any of your likeminded conspiracy-theorists produce a shred of evidence that confirm your theories are right; I am a goddamned gullible dupe...
I am aware that goverments lie, cheat and fake. But they don't do it always.
LarS1963 5 months ago
@LarS1963 "stones broght back to earth are real" Ask the DUTCH about their STONE...er...PETRIFIED WOOD. "refuse to believe" No, all you are doing is what a child does when they are first told SANTA isn't real. You are upset that you've been duped, and wish to avoid feeling like a fool! "proof coming out that it was all fake" The proof of the fraud has been coming out since PRIOR to the missions. Baron died for it! As did the Apollo 1 crew! "But they don't do it always" ;) ya, right!
un4g1v3n1 5 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 LOL.
I am terrible sorry, but I have no reason to act as a child does when told Santa isn't real.
Because, it will take a lot more than your ramblings to convince me I am wrong. I happen to have lived in the Netherlands, and I know rather a lot about your piece of "petrified wood". You can believe what you want, and I will stick to the facts. When you have proof to provide, please send it to Rolling Stone or another independant magazine, they will love it.
LarS1963 5 months ago
@LarS1963 "I am terrible sorry" The first accurate statement you have made. Although it's your logical/critical skills that are sorry.
Don't take my ramblings....Watch videos by myself, and my friend Jarrah White. Or just watch rare footage like launches of Saturn V's during Apollo missions. Listen to the voices of the actornots...Then, USE CRITICAL, LOGICAL THINKING SKILLS. Remember, reindeer can't fly, and voiceboxes can't be vibration-free during a ROCKET LAUNCH. WAKE UP!
un4g1v3n1 5 months ago
@LarS1963 Have you ever heard of the pendulum experiment done on Apollo 14? It is on video and the moon gravitational force was calculated from this and corresponds within 5% from the true value and it is as expected much, much lower than the earth gravitational force. This experiment is something one can not duplicate on earth - not even with trick photography with the astronauts moving while the experiment is going. Nice try, no cigar.
oomblikkies 5 months ago
@oomblikkies Ermmm....
No I haven't heard of it, although it sounds interesting. Why don't you pass this bit of interesting tidbit on to un4g1v3n1? Because, if you care to go back and actually read the posts, you will notice that I at no point claim that the moonlandings were fake. Rather on the contrary. ;)
That aside, where can I read more about this experiment?
LarS1963 5 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 Sorry, did you say petrified wood? Are you seriously suggesting that nasa faked moonrocks with petrified wood? The single rock available on earth that is LEAST FUCKING LIKELY to fool anyone ever? Do you seriously think anybody has ever been stupid enough to try and pass off petrified wood as a moon rock? Your info is terrible, and your acceptance of it shows the blindest confirmation bias I've ever seen.
TBuckleyBrain 5 months ago
@TBuckleyBrain Google FAKE MOON ROCK...OR DUTCH MOON ROCK...Then let the mind fucking come to an end for you! Also google VON BRAUN trip to antarctica...ya...in 67, two years before Apollo 11....collecting MOON ROCKS...Yeah!
Then try googling RADIOACTIVE MOON....KILLER ELECTRONS...and start the awakening process..Or stay mind-fucked....It is your mind, and you have the right to be deluded if you wish!
un4g1v3n1 5 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 "Durrr it's on the internet, it must be true!!!!!! Durrrrrrrrrr...." I don't usually trust the daily mail anyway, but even assuming it was true, it seems like someone pulled one over on the dutch prime minister, not the freaking world. Also, just because antarctica looks like the moon doesn't mean it does at a molecular level. And everyone knew the astronauts were exposed to radiation. Their total radiation exposure was under 5 rem. They were still inside earth's magnetosphere.
TBuckleyBrain 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TBuckleyBrain "They were still inside earth's magnetosphere." Durr.....The Moon is well past the Earth's MAGNETOSPHERE. So, I take it by this statement that you are aware of the fraud as well. That or you are an idiot. Which is it?
un4g1v3n1 5 months ago