Added: 11 months ago
From: MilitaryChannel
Views: 73,559
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (158)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The PzH2000 is better in any way but it has less points????

    WTF!!

  • loving all of these ignorant conversations in the coments with some foren asshole who doesn't know what he's talking about

  • yea than the electrical system fails and no artillery. thats the problem in this thing. and why does it have to be light weight? its artillery

  • @alex080297 mobile artillary, the thing has to move so bring light is better.

  • swiss archer is far better and more effective and mobile

  • In russia, they call those airsoft props.

  • only he army would think its straining for work like this, the Marines prides in its man power and tough conditioning will always overcome reliability problems of an automated system

  • Let the machines fight the wars... and then ... human again will fight machines.

  • SURPRISE BITCH

  • So.. The ARCHER is better on all points? And cheaper...

  • why in 3D? lol isnt it complete yet? lol

  • I have to say... our military in another 50 years are gonna be stupid lazy and fat cause everything is done for them.

  • maybe better if they make an meat balls cannon...

  • I would NOT want to be the grunt picking all the sand outta that high speed shit.

  • @TheKireh in case you dont know: coutrie are already doing that on a large scale. But some countrie are just hopeless... Us

  • Human: We need to help the people that's nearly dying and starving

    And then we have produced a new product... a big freakin weapon that kills people

    I don't really understand that

  • @Freddielovefootball It makes sense really... People are starving, we are killing our planet just to feed the ever increasing population.

    We are too many and need to become.. Erhm... Fewer.

  • rubber tracks and electric drive so it can "sneak up on the enemy". very handy for artillery now it seems

  • i say one word, archer

  • could this weapon shoots food and drink to africa ? when yes i'd spend money in it to build the next generation :)

  • this is better than my prius

  • dodbuzz(dot)com/2009/06/23/its­-official-fcs-cancelled/

  • This was cancelled in 2009. FAIL

  • Is like a Prius, but you wont look gay driving it.

  • oh look the americans give themselves one point more accuracy.stupid egoists

  • all that automation is nice until it breaks down right in the middle of a fire mission

  • @xekul there are such things as trials...

  • Russia, USA was the best.

  • really sneck up on the enemy lol

  • So this tank is a hybrid? This doesn't look good. :D

  • Shit, whats the maintenance on this thing...

  • can i haz 5 kill streak? :)

  • if ur using an artillary piece, why would u want to sneak up on an enemy? its like noscoping in real life haha

  • Google "Pzh Donar".

    It's a Pzh2000 on a different chassis with the difference, that it is semiautomatic. Awesome weapon.

  • This thing didn't even made it into production.

  • rubber band tracks... just wait till they dry rot!

  • This show has a bullshit rating system. This cannon got the same rating for Range as the PZH 2000 and its Range is only 18.6 miles where the PZH's Range is 25 miles.

  • Since when does something with a range of 30kms need to "sneak up on the enemy" lol

  • 6Rpm? WTF?!

  • Oh how far we've come as a species.

  • @MyFeldsher Sadly, Russia can't compete with the West. Now, as for your history, look at Israel. America's tech along with the West, has always had superior tech.

  • Понятно все с этим каналом. Пропаганда американской армии.

  • but they dont come with a way to fix it in the field have to send it back to the manu. dumb!!!

  • wtf only 20 minutes!?

  • I like the tank but not the cost xDDD

  • earlyer- With luck your easly survived

    Today- With luck your not badly wounded

    in a few Years- With luck your only dead

  • rubber band tracks, oh yeah this thing could be disabled quick.

  • In ten years all american soldiers would be as fat, as the rest of their nation.

  • @MrJohannes1995  Slightly ignorant?

  • @SacrificedAlive it´s a fact

  • @MrJohannes1995 have you seen american soldiers?

  • @topperheartramada no but i only know the sound its make when it takes a persons life.

  • @MrJohannes1995 Work on your grammar.

  • @topperheartramada i come from denmark. ps. not a english speaking country

  • @MrJohannes1995 Hasty generalization, i am fit and american.

  • @TheDAWinz ìs it a generalization to say americans are unfit when 60% of them are overweight?

  • @vett3l0l Yes, because 100% of americans i know are very fit.

  • @TheDAWinz whole usa population vs your mother and your only one friend aka your dog.

    o rly?

    over 50% of USA population are fat ass bastards, fat retarded coutry.

    Learn only 1 language in shool (every country except usa learns 2 ) and the poeple are fat ass reatrded idiots

    EVOAH HAHAHAHA

  • @NadorBledi soy americano y yo habla dos linguas. I'm American and I speak two languages. And I want to learn more, stereotypes are for losers.

  • @DADINOMASTER i dont speak about stereotypes i speak about the normal united states guy with normal shool education , they speak only 1 language for normal, 60% of united states population are overweight.

    no stereotypes , stereotype is when i say a black guy sells only drugs or muslims are terrorist.;)

  • @NadorBledi Trust me I know many Americans, adults tend to be overweight, but not obese as the media shows, and plus there are many americans that speak multiple languages and saturated and trans fats are being eradicated, I know what you're saying but we're getting better, I want to learn Mandarin next, which should be fun. Italian and French also interest me, since i already speak Spanish that won't be hard.

  • @DADINOMASTER yeah but fact is united states shools teach only english, no other languages.

    also your gov. play war the last 60 years and kill more people as hitler.

  • @NadorBledi your a dumbass every high school is required to learn a second foreign language or you will not graduate . And obesity is all over the world so do research and

    dont talk shit. You Sir are a Complete Ass. Also who has the best and biggest army? ohh yeah thats right!; the USA.

  • @IronmanLE1 biggest army in the world is the chinese army.

  • @TheDAWinz cool story bro

  • DO a weapon that stops human hunger and disseases

  • @davajTdavaj We already have one, it's called capitalism!

  • @s13iLLuminati you mean plutocracy? lol

  • @davajTdavaj They did, if you get hit by this you wont be hungry or sick ever again >8-D

  • @davajTdavaj its called a nuke..

  • @davajTdavaj it DOES stop human hunger and diseases. by ending the humans...

    i know thats not what you meant

  • @davajTdavaj that weapon name is humanism !

  • @davajTdavaj Yes, can you imagine living under the leadership of North Korea, Cuba. Venezuala, Iran, Old Iraq, China all you would eat is rice.

  • @davajTdavaj Pretty much all weapons do that, as death is a cure for both of those things.

    But yeah I get your point. If half of the money spent on the military was spent helping people it would likely reduce the need for military power beyond the loss to military spending.

  • @davajTdavaj

    Thats not a weapon.. It's called Food and Medicin...

  • @davajTdavaj u just need a bullet and a gun

  • @davajTdavaj make people stop having too many kids when there isn't enough to feed them all and world hunger will be almost gone.

  • @JeffreyRegistre

    Or how about we devide more and the US (and EU, but the US is much worse) waste less food so they require less and we can send more to other countries? The problem isn't the amount of food. The problem is that its not equaly devided.

  • @EliteGhost001

    Or... Why give food to other countries? White ppl problem much. Feed your own county in the 1st place, plenty of homeless to help. Same with some charities, why give money to other poor countries when you own county could use it better.

  • @davajTdavaj Every weapons stops that...

  • @davajTdavaj good luck with that

  • @davajTdavaj do a weapon that makes liberals get a job, get off welfare, and eat meat like the rest of humanity

  • @davajTdavaj cause of hunger in most of the 3rd world:

    lack of founds delegated to the general population due to greedy money hoarding dictators, who keep controll with an abundance of cold war weapons, bough with the very same money they loaned to build up their country.

    Solution:

    Have/make better weapons to remove control from said dictators/governments.

    Thats step 1 anyway, then comes other factors, like the general population not being religious retards.

  • @davajTdavaj It's called peace. Unfortunately enforced, if need be, by weapons.

  • @davajTdavaj hippies~

  • @davajTdavaj Technically.. Yes. Once a human is blown to hell, they will no longer be worried by hunger and disease.

  • @davajTdavaj called antibiotics, i have no answer for the food tho

  • @davajTdavaj It's called liberal democracy and science. We have those.

  • @davajTdavaj it does, by killing them lolz

  • @XGokuthestrongX It does not, programm cancelled like the rest of FCS.

  • now almost everything is automatic, imagine few years later, we don't have to recruit troops anymore, just send those heavy metal to conflict xD

  • one bullet in that mechanism and it wont shoot anymore

  • Skynet?

  • @ak907jk Soon, we won't need soldiers for anything. So yes, Skynet. lol

  • Home defense for the casual american

  • Looks to me like there are WAY to many places wheer dirt ans such could cause this thing to break down Though I might be wrong.

  • And God Said "Let there be explosives"... and the NLOS Cannon was made

  • @SoulFlyer133 And then it was cancelled in 2009.

  • '

    hope this cannon gun can hit and destroy ussr russia arms weapon

  • scary

    do we really need it

    why and how will it be used.

  • @bornbillsmith ever heard the word suppression fire

  • @katmandoom4 ...That's two words.

  • thas is a huge surprise

  • Why, howdy neighb-KABOOM!!1!

  • Comment removed

  • ok so when does stuff like this get deployed? I never see all that new high-tech stuff... so its fun that the US CAN, but when do they DO it?

  • war freak.!!

    

  • :-O  DEAR SANTA!

  • anything can be 'quick' in CGI...

  • yeah you're very quiet until you fire that 150mm howitser xp

  • I'd rather drive this to work than a Prius.

  • This cannon armed with GPS guided Howitzer shell is a complete WIN!

  • for anyone who doesn't know NLOS = Non Line Of Sight.

  • what happens with a malfunction, even hypothetically an emp

  • @AZKOJYUN Theres probably and safety protocol instaled in its programin or it just shuts itself down letting the crew to ccheck it and if needed to fix it. And theres actually no threat of any EMP's in todays battlefield unless a nuke is blow up wich would release an EMP blast. The only EMP wich doesint need a nuke explosion is too big to be carried aroun. Its roughly larger then a minivan and needs a lot of time to be set up.

  • @SbZr0720 Do the Projected Microwave Generated EMP counts?

  • @krnt13 If your talking about the mod on the Hummer wich lets off Microvave waves then no. Its purpose is to "shoot" a concentrated microvave beam at the target quicly heating it up. It does not give out enough EMP emissions to actually damage eny electronics.

  • @SbZr0720 No I didn't mean that, that one I meant to be used for riot control.

    I meant high-power microwave technology being conducted at the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory's Directed Energy Directorate at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico.

    But I think it still work in Progress.

  • @krnt13 Well if its still a work in progress then i doubt it will be a threat anytime soon. Because as i said before the only functioning EMP today wich doesint need a nuke explosion is too big to be carried across the battlefield. And if it were yoused there would be no way of directing its blast to where you wan't it.

  • maintenance must be a bitch, and fix ups rather complex

  • Sorry US dudes Swedens field hauwits Archer is far more better and faster. It fires Excalibur amunition, It only have 2 crew operators and they don't even have to go out of the vehicle. The Archer can extract it's canon in only 30 sec, fire it's rounds and then re-extract the canon in 30 seconds and then be on it's way even before the shell hits it's target. Go Bofors

  • It's like these guys are trying to convince me to buy the damn thing!

  • whatever happened to good old mortars?

  • @superrubberduckydude They can't reach as far away as artilerry wheicles can :P

  • 666 views =O

  • lol @ supposed allies fighting online

  • I would like to see how is going to work after a EMP attack

  • @TATairsoftsniper25 There is no threat of an EMP attack in todays battleifeld. The EMP are way to big to be carried around :D

  • Holy Shit. Tom Clansy Endwar was right!

  • So.. It doesn't do anything that Panzerhaubitze2000 can't do.

  • bumble bee tank

  • soso epic

    

  • not so quiet when the rounds start firing

  • all the advantages and the soldier is retarded :P

  • i call it "a toyota prius cannon"

  • @kazzemg lol

    

  • не лучше нашей 2С2

  • Comment removed

  • @DerFreiegedanke Totally Agree with you, it's much more powerful, faster, longer range and more advanced

  • @DerFreiegedanke i like the PZH2000 aswell but you have to admit this is better in every category

  • @hotpocketpoison

    Like the 6 rounds per minute instead of 10?

    And i don't think it can fire 3 rounds in 10 seconds like the PzH 2000 can. That's an very important feature if you want to hit one target with multiple rounds at the same time.

    Only four PzH 2000 can shell the shit out of you, by bombarding you with 20 simultaneous bombs.

  • @d34d10ck you cant compare the pzh 2000 and the XM1203

    the XM1203 is light years ahead in tec than pzh 2000 XM1203 cannon can fire several rounds at different trajectories allowing the rounds to impact on the same target at the same time, resulting in little or no reaction time for the enemy to adjust its position

  • @wiganerrmc

    Isn't that the same, what i said? The PzH2000 can fire up to 5 rounds in different trajectories to hit one target at once.

  • I would say one hit at this destroys it

  • @darkmuspell yeah my thoughts too. all very well and good in theory, but prob no match for a cheap IED or a well aimed RPG.

  • @jeebersjumpincryst I wouldn't count on it. You'd be VERY surpised at how un-affective IEDS are now adways. As for Rpg's same things, at least with the ones the terrorist are using which are very old, they can't pierce our armor anymore, atleast not on M1A1's, LAV's, or Stykers. So I uess it depends on how the armor of this is. but keep in mind, this isn't going to be in range of an RPG, it's artillery, so it could be miles off from the combat zone.

  • the first 3 coments ironic....

  • and no 2nd loser can say second derp derp

  • anyone is says first will die of the NLOS cannon

  • HA now no first losers can say FURST derp

  • @Manaray5000 congrats on first

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more