BRAVO!!!!!! J'ai tout compris, vous utilisez les mêmes film pour vos reportage , et entre vous et moi j'ai tout vu vous êtes des gros menteurs et ils y a des gens qui vBRAVO !!!!!! I understood everything, you use the same film for your story, and you and I have seen everything you are big liars and they are people who are waiting for you when you allunissage know that we're not all stupidous attendent lors de vos allunissage saché que nous ne sommes pas tous bêtes.
He said that when he saw the Surveyor 3 space craft that had landed 5 years ealier. Part of the mission was to bring back parts of it for analysis.
Having drawn on data and experience of Armstrongs breath taking seat of the pants landing another objective was to acheive a more controlled approach and touchdown.
@NASAvsPETE If you paid attention to the photographs, every single lander has radial dust disturbances all around the landing site; which differs from the general landscape further away from the engine bell.
Every single artistic impression of spacecraft on the moon depicted heavy disturbace in the dust under the rocket engine. If they were faking it then why did they not fake such disturbances? The truth is that the dynamics of the exhaust gasses in a vaccuum is very different than in an atmosphere enviroment.
i thought Pete accidentally cut the engine early when the contact light came on and the LEM dropped the last few feet. at least that's the way they portrayed in on "from the earth to the moon". the image is too dark to tell at that point. i was hoping it would show.
BRAVO!!!!!! J'ai tout compris, vous utilisez les mêmes film pour vos reportage , et entre vous et moi j'ai tout vu vous êtes des gros menteurs et ils y a des gens qui vBRAVO !!!!!! I understood everything, you use the same film for your story, and you and I have seen everything you are big liars and they are people who are waiting for you when you allunissage know that we're not all stupidous attendent lors de vos allunissage saché que nous ne sommes pas tous bêtes.
1312gilbert 8 months ago
BRAVO!!!!!!
1312gilbert 8 months ago
'Right down the middle of the road!'
He said that when he saw the Surveyor 3 space craft that had landed 5 years ealier. Part of the mission was to bring back parts of it for analysis.
Having drawn on data and experience of Armstrongs breath taking seat of the pants landing another objective was to acheive a more controlled approach and touchdown.
tpsossff 1 year ago
@NASAvsPETE If you paid attention to the photographs, every single lander has radial dust disturbances all around the landing site; which differs from the general landscape further away from the engine bell.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle
Every single artistic impression of spacecraft on the moon depicted heavy disturbace in the dust under the rocket engine. If they were faking it then why did they not fake such disturbances? The truth is that the dynamics of the exhaust gasses in a vaccuum is very different than in an atmosphere enviroment.
tpsossff 1 year ago
@tpsossff That's very true. It wouldn't make sense if they were faking it, to forget this.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
They are so happy to be there!
hunterhalo2 1 year ago
@hunterhalo2 I'd be happy too!
josh71111 1 year ago
i thought Pete accidentally cut the engine early when the contact light came on and the LEM dropped the last few feet. at least that's the way they portrayed in on "from the earth to the moon". the image is too dark to tell at that point. i was hoping it would show.
zice39 3 years ago
Thanks for the video. So interesting to compare crews. Enjoyed watching this. Thx.
mason104 4 years ago 5