What about a down filled pillow? Surely all those little feathers would fall slower than a hammer. Science prize please. Try to say that 10 times really fast. That 10 times, that 10 times, that 10 times.
Daumen Hoch! Das dann auch noch aufgrund der Schwerkraft und der Luft^^ beide Gleichschnell fallen *___* Nur weil manche Denken das es Fake is......alles neiider!
P.s ihr seid wirklich Spaßten! Und Daumen hoch, folgen auf Twitter, linken bei Facebook und abonieren!
It's great that they give credit to Galileo: Science is not a body of discoveries made by individuals, but an ongoing collaboration spanning millennia.
holy crap, some of these comments are so stupid. Gravity isnt a speed, its an acceleration. on earth is is 9.8m/s/s, on the moon it is 1.62m/s/s. whether this is photoshopped or not, the theory is correct, in the absence of air resistance (obviously the feather has a lot more resistance per unit mass than a hammer) then two objects dropped from the same height will accellerate at the same rate and hit the ground at the same time
For those saying there is no gravity, you are an idiot, that is all
I think you are confusing gravity with atmosphere. The moon has a weaker gravitational pull than the earth because it is much smaller, and that's why it has no atmosphere because it couldn't hold onto one. Solid objects don't escape so easily, they are still held by gravity but it is weaker than on earth.
Wow I love this video. You can actually see the difference in gravity in this representation. Look at the acceleration of the objects, much slower than earth!
Alright if you want to believe that we never landed on the moon, believe that. However--- the Voyager crafts (which are nearing the edge of the Solar System) are real. If we can make something that passes Neptune and Uranus, surely we can visit our own little insignificant moon?
@NASACrooks You seriously dedicated your whole life to conspiracies and hoax's? Are you also some of the people who believe Kennedy was killed by the CIA? Yeah this happened 40 years ago, so let it go. Dedicate your life to something good alright?
Does your mum know you are on the net trolling people who could be at the age of her father?I think no.So tell her what you do,and we'll take it from there.
@NASACrooks Oh she knows. That was not trolling, that was a suggestion to quit telling people the moon landing was a hoax and maybe just maybe get a good hobby like other grown men?
I took the time to look at your video of the guy dropping the hammer and feather on earth. The experiment is a definite hoax thus you have been fooled.
The feather bounced thus its weighted but thats not even the point! Notice he is NOT dropping it horizontal (as the astronaut in the video), he is dropping it vertically. If you take an envelope and drop it vertically you will notice that it will drop at about the same speed as a hammer. (Try it).
THIS experiment is a proof that they were indeed on the moon, with no air around, and with 1/6 of earth gravity. Doing such on earth was impossible at that time (highly evacuated vacuumized big film studio??? SURELY not). I clearly see a feather and behaving like such, the other thing is a hammer. Both items fell down in the same time showing that both items are accelerated to the same speed.
More examples of this: Take a look at any of the moon videos, where they walk, or where they drive the moon vehicle. Look at the dust kicked up by the feet or by the wheels. Notice how that dust falls down, in a perfect parabola, just like a rock. In even a thin atmosphere, the dust would spread out and fall slowly.
For any conspiracy nut: Even today we do not have the technology to create a perfect enough vacuum, in a big enough room, to reproduce that on earth.
Who saw Apollo 18? That movie is another proof that you can shoot everything here on earth. A lot of people think is real :))) Why? Because it looks "real" just like first landing, 1969.
@dinsubpamant Never seen any "Apollo18". There never was any Apollo 18. But I've seen "Apollo 13". That was made using technques (CGI for example) that weren't even invented in the real Apollo days.
Apollo 18's a fictional account of a mission covered up by NASA and the Soviets (who also landed on the moon), as the astronauts were killed by 'Moon Spiders'
@dinsubpamant yeah, sure, and in 1969 they had the same technology that there is nowadays to create a realistic fake movie... please... don't be so sceptic.... and, this video is the best proof they were in the Moon, it's impossivel to drop a hammer and a feather at the same time and landing at the same time in our planete because of the atmosphere... the air makes the feather fall slower... but in the Moon since there is no atmosphere they fall at the same time... like in the video
[1]- I don't copy & paste x-pedias. I use references as the need demands, and I'm as likely to use the University stacks as an online source Not everyone is as gloriously unlearned as you are.
[2]- What matters isn't where I got it, but if it's true. In fact, the physics of terminal velocity isn't some kooky fringe crackpottery. It's something which can be demonstrated in your bathtub. But of course, bathtubs may still be a mystery to you.
@shadowhunter144 It dpends on the conspiracy though. The moon one is obviously bollocks but some are relevent. It is the business of scientists and logical thinkers everywhere to question everything.....including the mainstream point of view.
@shadowhunter144 Good to hear. The old conspiracy theory term is a straw is an ad hom to block critical annalysis and probably more dangerous than all the standing armies and nuclear weopons combined.
@spanisheman Force in this case is F = mg, with m = mass, and g = local gravitational acceleration. Force is, then, proportional to mass. Whichever is more massive has the greater force upon it.
Force is also proportional to g; but since g is approximately uniform for both hammer and feather, they both have the same acceleration under gravity. If the hammer were dropped from higher up than the feather, it'd suffer a smaller initial acceleration.
Dude! Fuck wadsworth. I get the idea and it's right most of the time, but i'm sick of reading this shit in the youtube comments. Also, it's only semi-correct in this case, because this guy is on THE FUCKING MOON!
@HerbertTheSchnervert Their landing module is called Falcon, which is why he says "the feather happens to be appropriately a falcon feather, for our Falcon."
The only people who are conspiracy theorists are people too stupid to do research or have over exaggerated every little thing that the government does.
for all the people debating the moon landing "hoax".... we were in a space race with the USSR and they never once denied or even questioned the USA landing on the moon. that should be enough for you right there.
So fake. Everyone knows there are moon men that live to be nearly 1000 years old. Otherwise they are just like you and me, so why would astronauts need suits like that?
@16dots I think that is unfair. Ask yourself, which is more likely: that we spent billions of dollars to fly hundreds of miles into outerspace to drop a hammer and a feather, or that we filmed it on a studio? The simplest explanation is always right.
@rodgling we had the technology to fly to the moon. Everybody saw the rocket take off. There are even now photos of the tracks and stuff that was left behind. What's so hard to believe?
@InnocenceExperience It would be much easier to fake this video and the photos in a studio. There is simply no way we would spend billions flying to the moon just to drop a feather and a hammer. I could go and get a hammer from my garage and do that right now, what is the use of spending a billion dollars on that?
@rodgling You are truly a fucking moron. This video isn't why we went to the moon. We went there for a whole host of reasons including sticking it to the russians. Besides if you dropped a feather and a hammer they would hit the ground at a different time because there is something called air on earth which would slow the feather down significantly. Air isn't a government conspiracy to slow down birds either. Just so you know. I know how you're prone to believing stupid shit.
"There has been much debate over the years on whether this footage is real, or was faked in a studio. Decide for yourself!"
No, there fucking hasn't. There is no serious debate among intelligent individuals. There have been a few conspiracy theorist fucktards who make a lot of noise. Anyone with half a brain accepts the fact that we went to the moon...
@unqueued .. these guys are either shills or so brainwashed from TV and diet and zionist MSM spin that they cant be reached, don't even try ... they never even heard of nurse nayirah
@Ph4nToMX I'll field this one. The problem is you're thinking too Earth-centric. Since the moon has very little gravity the lander required very little upward thrust when landing. And since the moon has no atmosphere, the vacuum caused the pressure from the thrusters to spread out rapidly. This means they only required around 3000 pounds of thrust to safely land, with a dispersal on the surface of only 1.5 psi. To put that in perspective, a human bite is anywhere from 60 to 120 psi.
@Ph4nToMX The appropriate answer to your question is another question: What makes you sure there should be a blast crater? As it turns out, the only reason anyone thinks there ought to be one is because they appear in paintings, made to illustrate the landings, by artists who didn't walk on the Moon. Cratering physics isn't anything like the mechanism at work when the LM settled onto the Moon's surface. Even airburst nukes don't dig out craters the way you suppose.
@qed100 because the astronauts apparently were able to leave 2 inch deep footprints in a "soft sand" like surface almost everywhere they walked on the moon. nasa picked that area to land on the moon because it wasnt rocky and it was an even surface, so you cant say the lunar landers landed on rocks. you do realize the lunar landers had thrusters capable of 10,000 pounds right? yet the ground underneath is completely spotless. so no, paintings arent the reason, physics is the reason.
@Ph4nToMX It's still not true that there should be craters beneath the LM. The craters only appear in illustrations and Revell model kits.
But why did they leave well-defined footprints even near the LM? Because the engine didn't scour away all of the topsoil down to bedrock. Why would it? How deep is the top blanket of dirt?
It's also not true that the ground is spotless. Look closely at pics beneath the LM for various missions. Graduation of soil texture is evident.
@pt1gard The LR's tracks are invisible only when they are hidden by slightly higher ground or when the astronauts have walked around it, trampling and kicking up dust, thereby "erasing" the tracks. Check again...
@Astronaut890 So, only "intelligent individuals" believe men went to the moon? You for example: You believe a dozen or so men crossed deep space and landed on the moon, never bothered to change camera exposure in order to photograph the stars - didn't even bring a telescope - BUT DID haul and assemble dune buggies from a module barely large enough to fit 2 men (let alone tons of fuel) then returned to Earth where all the telemetry from their missions was eventually "misplaced"? Yup, you = smart!
@eponym2 There is hard evidence that we landed on the moon. We use a reflector placed on the moon to reflect back photons from a laser to check its distance everyday. The lunar orbiter also has taken pictures of the Apollo landing sites and you can clearly see the astronauts footprints and equipment. Only the uneducated believe that we faked the moon landings. Did you pay attention in school?
@eponym2 The Russians did put their reflectors up with robots. But it wasn't before Apollo. The first Russian retroreflector landed on the Moon nearly a year and a half after the Apollo Program placed its first one.
@qed100 Nope! And anyone who's looked into Apollo-Soyuz (even casually) will wonder why the Russians weren't involved with NASA sooner, you know, since they were years ahead of the Americans and killing the space-race right up till that big, highly spurious TV broadcast....Google is offering $20 million btw to anyone who lands a robot on the moon and takes pics; probably because they can afford to and someone (like me) would like to see what it 'actually' looks like on the moon before they die
@eponym2 You told someone to look it up. Now you need to take your own advice. Lunokhod 1 landed November 1970. Apollo 11, July the year before. And if you want pics from the lunar surface, and not from Apollo, then you still need to look up the Lunokhod program. The pics look rather familiar.
By the way, the United States wasn't really far behind the USSR. The US was able to orbit a satellite before Sputnik ever went up. Aerospace was an American forte before Kennedy ever made his speech.
@Astronaut890 lol. just like you "know" there's been a moon landing, they "know" there hasn't been one. though the difference between you and them is that they actually have questions
I'm not saying the moon landing isn't real, I don't care. but you can't say with 100% accuracy that everything in this video's real if you don't even know what the fuck's taking place. and I doubt most people with a normal American education do.
@Astronaut890 This video dont prove they went, it can be a fake lightweight hammer or even a weighted feather. Conspiracy theoriest have full right to not believe what they are told, despite it being the truth or not. You can't honestly say we are not lied to every single day. People lie to get their own way. I'm going to stay with an open mind until absolute solid proof. If you think we are not lied to, just look at the last 50 years of who was in power and what they say they would do but didnt
@benjyboba This is legit in principle, but in practice it can get complicated. Anything you haven't seen with your own eyes could potentially just be a big lie. Ever been to Tristan da Cunha? No? How do you know anyone's been there? How do you know there is such a place? Has anyone walked on the Moon? Maybe yes, maybe no. But take care and keep in mind that the Federal Government does more than just lie to people. It also has to do some real work or the Country will collapse.
@benjyboba In order to get the time of fall right, a fake hammer would need to be of such low density that it'd reach terminal velocity in a very small fraction of a second. But, at terminal velocity it wouldn't display uniform acceleration during the fall and would be a dead giveaway. A faked heavy, rigid feather has its own problems. In particular, it'd need to display absolutely no drag-induced dynamics. That's not such an easy thing to arrange for an object with the geometry of a feather.
Hey a man on the moon describing the experiment hes about to conduct that's pretty interestin- NOPE WADSWORTH CONSTANT WADSWORTH CONSTANT IM A FUCKSHIT
Uh fake. Everyone knows they filmed the moon landings on earth.. and unless they did it in a total vacuum that can't possibly be real. OMGWHOWOULDDOTHIS?! -- Predicting the crazys. :P
wouldnt the velocity proprietate the friction of the shuttle surface and thus cause and influx of increased acceleration, thus disproportioning the foundation of the shuttle?
How could this shit be photoshoped? it was in the 60s - 70s ... jeezzz
MrSoccerr 6 hours ago
What about a down filled pillow? Surely all those little feathers would fall slower than a hammer. Science prize please. Try to say that 10 times really fast. That 10 times, that 10 times, that 10 times.
Joust2011 4 days ago
It's because of the lack of air resistance. Without air resistance the feather and hammer hit the ground simultaneously.
YuTewb 4 days ago
this is fun
ereignisfelder 1 week ago
Fuck that's awesome.
TenYetis 1 week ago
OMQ wie Scotty die Sachen fallen lässt!
Daumen Hoch! Das dann auch noch aufgrund der Schwerkraft und der Luft^^ beide Gleichschnell fallen *___* Nur weil manche Denken das es Fake is......alles neiider!
P.s ihr seid wirklich Spaßten! Und Daumen hoch, folgen auf Twitter, linken bei Facebook und abonieren!
Jerebam1 1 week ago
It's great that they give credit to Galileo: Science is not a body of discoveries made by individuals, but an ongoing collaboration spanning millennia.
CowLunch 1 week ago
You dont photo shop videos stupid people and even if it was edited who cares its cool
Zacha2294 2 weeks ago
holy crap, some of these comments are so stupid. Gravity isnt a speed, its an acceleration. on earth is is 9.8m/s/s, on the moon it is 1.62m/s/s. whether this is photoshopped or not, the theory is correct, in the absence of air resistance (obviously the feather has a lot more resistance per unit mass than a hammer) then two objects dropped from the same height will accellerate at the same rate and hit the ground at the same time
For those saying there is no gravity, you are an idiot, that is all
shannonward86 2 weeks ago 7
@shannonward86 But hey now, fucking magnets, how do they work?
flashlightsfreak 4 days ago
240p we meet again!!!
Dwebeking 2 weeks ago 2
I love the cheerful little jumps at the end
MatsEP 2 weeks ago
this is photoshopped!! ppl wake up!!
mohdban 2 weeks ago
@mikun157 yes, but the moon's gravity is so faint that a feather would not drop that fast, a feather doesn't even drop that fast on earth!
onelastscar66 3 weeks ago
@onelastscar66 There's wind resistance on Earth. Dehhhhh
Imakeplanesboom 2 weeks ago 4
@onelastscar66 That's because there is air resistance on Earth, the feather would sway until it hits the ground on Earth.
Obviously the hammer falls much slower than it does on Earth because of the 1/6 gravity.
Traduced1 2 weeks ago
@onelastscar66 Unless you've been on the moon, I'd advise thinking before you post something that stupid.
MRb00sh 2 weeks ago
there's no gravity on the moon; with that in mind, nor the hammer or the feather would have fallen at all, they would have just floated there.
onelastscar66 3 weeks ago
@onelastscar66 You're kidding right?
hceely 3 weeks ago 3
@onelastscar66
The moons gravity is the 1/6 strenght of earths gravity.
Every object has gravity me, you or even a tennis ball it's just so small that you couldn't posibly imagine it and so small that it doesn't act.
mikun157 3 weeks ago
@onelastscar66
I think you are confusing gravity with atmosphere. The moon has a weaker gravitational pull than the earth because it is much smaller, and that's why it has no atmosphere because it couldn't hold onto one. Solid objects don't escape so easily, they are still held by gravity but it is weaker than on earth.
CowLunch 1 week ago
Science is wonderful.
AndrewDangerously 3 weeks ago
excited r2-d2 in the background = STAR WARS IS A DOCUMENTARY, GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN COVERING IT UP FOR DECADES
P3wnd666 3 weeks ago 2
homework help win
whizz104 4 weeks ago
God damit I hate gallileo so much. Praise moses!!
BWCmike 1 month ago
Wow I love this video. You can actually see the difference in gravity in this representation. Look at the acceleration of the objects, much slower than earth!
hunterhalo2 1 month ago
0:46 the clown is jerked up by the wire.
NASACrooks 1 month ago
Comment removed
3KS26 1 month ago
@NASACrooks
Not it's not wires. The gravitational force on the moon is 1.63 m/s2 (1/6th of earth gravity)
3KS26 1 month ago
@3KS26
Very interesting. And what is the gravitational force in area 51 and Arizona deserts where they filmed the moon hoax?
NASACrooks 1 month ago
@NASACrooks
Not sure if If your being serious or not.
3KS26 1 month ago
@3KS26
Same here.
NASACrooks 1 month ago
Comment removed
3KS26 1 month ago
@NASACrooks i would have a pretty safe bet at 9.8m/s2
shannonward86 2 weeks ago
@NASACrooks
Alright if you want to believe that we never landed on the moon, believe that. However--- the Voyager crafts (which are nearing the edge of the Solar System) are real. If we can make something that passes Neptune and Uranus, surely we can visit our own little insignificant moon?
Omicronon 1 week ago
@Omicronon
My grandma had two gold teeth. How does that proving man went to the moon?
NASACrooks 1 week ago
@NASACrooks Aside from photos and videos, which you believe are photoshopped, there is hard evidence.
Google "what hard evidence was brought back from the moon" and select the first link.
Omicronon 6 days ago
I personally think this kinda stuff is interesting. Heck I'm 14 and I know the moon landing wasn't fake because of things like this video
strat458796 1 month ago
@strat458796
If you want to see how you can do in your kitchen the same trick this "astronaut" does here,
watch?v=XQhTGRdg0II
NASACrooks 1 month ago
@NASACrooks Really dude?
strat458796 1 month ago
@NASACrooks You seriously dedicated your whole life to conspiracies and hoax's? Are you also some of the people who believe Kennedy was killed by the CIA? Yeah this happened 40 years ago, so let it go. Dedicate your life to something good alright?
strat458796 1 month ago
@strat458796
Does your mum know you are on the net trolling people who could be at the age of her father?I think no.So tell her what you do,and we'll take it from there.
NASACrooks 1 month ago
@NASACrooks Oh she knows. That was not trolling, that was a suggestion to quit telling people the moon landing was a hoax and maybe just maybe get a good hobby like other grown men?
strat458796 1 month ago
Comment removed
3KS26 1 month ago
Comment removed
3KS26 1 month ago
Comment removed
3KS26 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@NASACrooks
I took the time to look at your video of the guy dropping the hammer and feather on earth. The experiment is a definite hoax thus you have been fooled.
The feather bounced thus its weighted but thats not even the point! Notice he is NOT dropping it horizontal (as the astronaut in the video), he is dropping it vertically. If you take an envelope and drop it vertically you will notice that it will drop at about the same speed as a hammer. (Try it).
Hope this helps, cheers!
3KS26 1 month ago 4
I first saw this video on the day I visited Galileo's memorial in Forence. Can't really think of a better tribute to the great man.
PhunkyNun 1 month ago
Funny how not many hoaxers comment on this video
Dudecoolhat 1 month ago
THIS experiment is a proof that they were indeed on the moon, with no air around, and with 1/6 of earth gravity. Doing such on earth was impossible at that time (highly evacuated vacuumized big film studio??? SURELY not). I clearly see a feather and behaving like such, the other thing is a hammer. Both items fell down in the same time showing that both items are accelerated to the same speed.
berndpfe 1 month ago
More examples of this: Take a look at any of the moon videos, where they walk, or where they drive the moon vehicle. Look at the dust kicked up by the feet or by the wheels. Notice how that dust falls down, in a perfect parabola, just like a rock. In even a thin atmosphere, the dust would spread out and fall slowly.
For any conspiracy nut: Even today we do not have the technology to create a perfect enough vacuum, in a big enough room, to reproduce that on earth.
realisticHomeboy 1 month ago
i love physics :)
nat0000ham 2 months ago
Mme Prins...
TheRaizo101 2 months ago
it's CGI
aurash91 2 months ago
@aurash91 Hope You are joking, because otherwise You are unbelievable ignorant. CGI was invented decades after the lunar landings.
YDDES 2 months ago 13
the height of american contribution to human knowledge.
timlamiamify 2 months ago
Who saw Apollo 18? That movie is another proof that you can shoot everything here on earth. A lot of people think is real :))) Why? Because it looks "real" just like first landing, 1969.
dinsubpamant 2 months ago
@dinsubpamant Never seen any "Apollo18". There never was any Apollo 18. But I've seen "Apollo 13". That was made using technques (CGI for example) that weren't even invented in the real Apollo days.
YDDES 2 months ago
Apollo 18's a fictional account of a mission covered up by NASA and the Soviets (who also landed on the moon), as the astronauts were killed by 'Moon Spiders'
cajjer 2 months ago
@dinsubpamant yeah, sure, and in 1969 they had the same technology that there is nowadays to create a realistic fake movie... please... don't be so sceptic.... and, this video is the best proof they were in the Moon, it's impossivel to drop a hammer and a feather at the same time and landing at the same time in our planete because of the atmosphere... the air makes the feather fall slower... but in the Moon since there is no atmosphere they fall at the same time... like in the video
gothkrix 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Of course, we all know that the moon landing was faked. [/sarcasm]
Soulsphere001 2 months ago
Comment removed
Soulsphere001 2 months ago
@qed100 You just went to Wikipedia, didn't you?
eponym2 2 months ago
@eponym2
[1]- I don't copy & paste x-pedias. I use references as the need demands, and I'm as likely to use the University stacks as an online source Not everyone is as gloriously unlearned as you are.
[2]- What matters isn't where I got it, but if it's true. In fact, the physics of terminal velocity isn't some kooky fringe crackpottery. It's something which can be demonstrated in your bathtub. But of course, bathtubs may still be a mystery to you.
qed100 2 months ago
Absolute fraud. This was really filmed on Mars. Anyone with half a brain can see that.
InGratiaDei 2 months ago
I hate conspiracy theorists. I hate them and their bs pseudo-theories so god damn much.
shadowhunter144 2 months ago 23
@shadowhunter144 ... nurse nayirah .... watch?v=jTWY14eyMFg ... uss liberty ... operation northwoods
pt1gard 2 months ago
@shadowhunter144 It dpends on the conspiracy though. The moon one is obviously bollocks but some are relevent. It is the business of scientists and logical thinkers everywhere to question everything.....including the mainstream point of view.
fibbsabaddy 1 month ago
@fibbsabaddy I understand that. But in this case, I'm talking specifically about the moon landing conspiracy theorists.
shadowhunter144 1 month ago
@shadowhunter144 Good to hear. The old conspiracy theory term is a straw is an ad hom to block critical annalysis and probably more dangerous than all the standing armies and nuclear weopons combined.
fibbsabaddy 4 weeks ago
i have 2 see this for school and 4 interest :)
TheNo1ndubzfan 2 months ago
Does anyone know which object would have the greater magnitude of force downwards, or would the both have the same magnitude of force downwards?
spanisheman 3 months ago
@spanisheman Force in this case is F = mg, with m = mass, and g = local gravitational acceleration. Force is, then, proportional to mass. Whichever is more massive has the greater force upon it.
Force is also proportional to g; but since g is approximately uniform for both hammer and feather, they both have the same acceleration under gravity. If the hammer were dropped from higher up than the feather, it'd suffer a smaller initial acceleration.
qed100 3 months ago
what I want to know is how come man can go to the moon but we can't make a good tin opener?
InnocenceExperience 3 months ago
@InnocenceExperience Because man never went to the moon
eponym2 2 months ago
@eponym2 hahahahahahaha what, you're serious? hahahahahahahaha
InnocenceExperience 2 months ago
This scene alone had more tension then the entirety of Apollo 18...
TheInspector3000 3 months ago
nunca llegaron a la luna todo calza POLLO!
drizyfoz 3 months ago 2
Ding Fries are done!
hotchrisbfries 3 months ago
damn i finally landed this. logged it on hotsteeze . com.
inda5club53 3 months ago
Dude! Fuck wadsworth. I get the idea and it's right most of the time, but i'm sick of reading this shit in the youtube comments. Also, it's only semi-correct in this case, because this guy is on THE FUCKING MOON!
schmarotzer 3 months ago
"The feather appropriatly is a falcon feather, from a falcon"
I chuckled when he said that. :)
skulhead12 3 months ago
"How bout that?" :)
DontFearGrim 3 months ago
LITTERBUG!
volocom7 3 months ago
Wadsworth Constant applies x2
TrilogyHyperstation 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wadsworth Constant x3
xVxxxGhostxxxVx 3 months ago
Comment removed
xVxxxGhostxxxVx 3 months ago
WOW!! Just like it happens on ERF!!
Pnanasnoic 3 months ago
Wadsworth constant applies.
ChainStatic 3 months ago 25
@ChainStatic Does not. If an astronaut has something to say, I want to hear it.
NoSkates 2 months ago
@ChainStatic Don't you dare wadsworth history such as this!
bs0l 2 months ago
"A falcon feather from a... uh... falcon."
HerbertTheSchnervert 3 months ago
@HerbertTheSchnervert Their landing module is called Falcon, which is why he says "the feather happens to be appropriately a falcon feather, for our Falcon."
elsnaibs 3 months ago
wadsworth constant applies here
direwolf47 3 months ago
*Last two seconds* MY FUCKING EARS.
Aglinoodle 3 months ago 2
The only people who are conspiracy theorists are people too stupid to do research or have over exaggerated every little thing that the government does.
xGothimox 3 months ago
"how bout that?" why did I like how he said that so much....
Paulissunshine 3 months ago
for all the people debating the moon landing "hoax".... we were in a space race with the USSR and they never once denied or even questioned the USA landing on the moon. that should be enough for you right there.
AerojetGeneral260 3 months ago
0:27 And the feather happens to be appropriately a falcon feather....from a falcon....
oWindx 3 months ago
@oWindx "For our falcon"; The lunar module was called Falcon.
neilmckillop 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@oWindx "for our falcon". The Lunar Module was named Falcon.
Raxilla 3 months ago
Wadsworth Constant x3
Jinnigan 3 months ago 2
Comment removed
InnocenceExperience 3 months ago
You know they tried it before they turned the camera on, just in case.
InnocenceExperience 3 months ago
So fake. Everyone knows there are moon men that live to be nearly 1000 years old. Otherwise they are just like you and me, so why would astronauts need suits like that?
vlrxgames 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
did he died?
blacky777 3 months ago
0:36 for the experiment
aukanoob 3 months ago
FAKE, there is no gravity on the moon. There was probably a wire attached to the feather to pull it down to the floor.
rodgling 3 months ago
@rodgling You are a good example of a failed education system.
16dots 3 months ago
@16dots I think that is unfair. Ask yourself, which is more likely: that we spent billions of dollars to fly hundreds of miles into outerspace to drop a hammer and a feather, or that we filmed it on a studio? The simplest explanation is always right.
rodgling 3 months ago
@rodgling we had the technology to fly to the moon. Everybody saw the rocket take off. There are even now photos of the tracks and stuff that was left behind. What's so hard to believe?
InnocenceExperience 3 months ago
@InnocenceExperience He's joking
ClashOfNinja 3 months ago
@InnocenceExperience It would be much easier to fake this video and the photos in a studio. There is simply no way we would spend billions flying to the moon just to drop a feather and a hammer. I could go and get a hammer from my garage and do that right now, what is the use of spending a billion dollars on that?
rodgling 3 months ago
@rodgling America *would* spend billions flying to the moon to drop a feather and hammer if somebody else was trying to do it first lol
InnocenceExperience 3 months ago
@rodgling You are truly a fucking moron. This video isn't why we went to the moon. We went there for a whole host of reasons including sticking it to the russians. Besides if you dropped a feather and a hammer they would hit the ground at a different time because there is something called air on earth which would slow the feather down significantly. Air isn't a government conspiracy to slow down birds either. Just so you know. I know how you're prone to believing stupid shit.
xTheeCandyManx 3 months ago
@rodgling LMFAOOO are you joking me right now? fucking idiot. LOL
itsCLICHE 3 months ago
@16dots He's clearly joking. There is gravity on the moon.
ClashOfNinja 3 months ago
@ClashOfNinja are you sure? it wasn't funny and the conspiracy theorists probably really say things like that
InnocenceExperience 3 months ago
@InnocenceExperience Oh my bad, you're right. He made another comment. Damn conspiracy theorists. -.-
ClashOfNinja 3 months ago
@rodgling are you a fucking retard... there is gravity on the moon it's just weaker than gravity on earth.
wertay2 3 months ago
"There has been much debate over the years on whether this footage is real, or was faked in a studio. Decide for yourself!"
No, there fucking hasn't. There is no serious debate among intelligent individuals. There have been a few conspiracy theorist fucktards who make a lot of noise. Anyone with half a brain accepts the fact that we went to the moon...
Astronaut890 3 months ago 212
@Astronaut890 sir, you just do not understand the truther.
you probaly think that 9/11 was not inside job, or that obmaa is american, or that there isnt lithium in the dirnking water.
im so sorry for u that u have not been opened up to the truth truth about our world.
unqueued 3 months ago
@unqueued just hang urself please
vivalaliljaa 3 months ago
@unqueued .. these guys are either shills or so brainwashed from TV and diet and zionist MSM spin that they cant be reached, don't even try ... they never even heard of nurse nayirah
pt1gard 2 months ago
Comment removed
eliel123 3 months ago
@Astronaut890 you have very vulgar vocabulary for a guy who considers himself smart
eliel123 3 months ago
@eliel123 The use of certain words does not reflect someone's intelligence.
Jackzill4 3 months ago 2
@Astronaut890 please explain why there are no blast craters under any of the lunar landers in any pictures taken from the moons surface, thank you.
Ph4nToMX 3 months ago
Comment removed
lundbergjuice 3 months ago
@Ph4nToMX I'll field this one. The problem is you're thinking too Earth-centric. Since the moon has very little gravity the lander required very little upward thrust when landing. And since the moon has no atmosphere, the vacuum caused the pressure from the thrusters to spread out rapidly. This means they only required around 3000 pounds of thrust to safely land, with a dispersal on the surface of only 1.5 psi. To put that in perspective, a human bite is anywhere from 60 to 120 psi.
lundbergjuice 3 months ago 11
@Ph4nToMX The appropriate answer to your question is another question: What makes you sure there should be a blast crater? As it turns out, the only reason anyone thinks there ought to be one is because they appear in paintings, made to illustrate the landings, by artists who didn't walk on the Moon. Cratering physics isn't anything like the mechanism at work when the LM settled onto the Moon's surface. Even airburst nukes don't dig out craters the way you suppose.
qed100 3 months ago
@qed100 because the astronauts apparently were able to leave 2 inch deep footprints in a "soft sand" like surface almost everywhere they walked on the moon. nasa picked that area to land on the moon because it wasnt rocky and it was an even surface, so you cant say the lunar landers landed on rocks. you do realize the lunar landers had thrusters capable of 10,000 pounds right? yet the ground underneath is completely spotless. so no, paintings arent the reason, physics is the reason.
Ph4nToMX 3 months ago
@Ph4nToMX It's still not true that there should be craters beneath the LM. The craters only appear in illustrations and Revell model kits.
But why did they leave well-defined footprints even near the LM? Because the engine didn't scour away all of the topsoil down to bedrock. Why would it? How deep is the top blanket of dirt?
It's also not true that the ground is spotless. Look closely at pics beneath the LM for various missions. Graduation of soil texture is evident.
qed100 3 months ago
@Ph4nToMX ... my problem is when the LR doesnt have tracks, many pics show such a thing
pt1gard 2 months ago
@pt1gard The LR's tracks are invisible only when they are hidden by slightly higher ground or when the astronauts have walked around it, trampling and kicking up dust, thereby "erasing" the tracks. Check again...
YDDES 2 months ago
@Astronaut890 So, only "intelligent individuals" believe men went to the moon? You for example: You believe a dozen or so men crossed deep space and landed on the moon, never bothered to change camera exposure in order to photograph the stars - didn't even bring a telescope - BUT DID haul and assemble dune buggies from a module barely large enough to fit 2 men (let alone tons of fuel) then returned to Earth where all the telemetry from their missions was eventually "misplaced"? Yup, you = smart!
eponym2 3 months ago
@eponym2 There is hard evidence that we landed on the moon. We use a reflector placed on the moon to reflect back photons from a laser to check its distance everyday. The lunar orbiter also has taken pictures of the Apollo landing sites and you can clearly see the astronauts footprints and equipment. Only the uneducated believe that we faked the moon landings. Did you pay attention in school?
MrJarrisonwins 3 months ago
@MrJarrisonwins The Russians put those reflectors there before Apollo, with unmanned rovers....look it up
eponym2 3 months ago
@eponym2 The Russians did put their reflectors up with robots. But it wasn't before Apollo. The first Russian retroreflector landed on the Moon nearly a year and a half after the Apollo Program placed its first one.
qed100 3 months ago
@qed100 Nope! And anyone who's looked into Apollo-Soyuz (even casually) will wonder why the Russians weren't involved with NASA sooner, you know, since they were years ahead of the Americans and killing the space-race right up till that big, highly spurious TV broadcast....Google is offering $20 million btw to anyone who lands a robot on the moon and takes pics; probably because they can afford to and someone (like me) would like to see what it 'actually' looks like on the moon before they die
eponym2 3 months ago
@eponym2 You told someone to look it up. Now you need to take your own advice. Lunokhod 1 landed November 1970. Apollo 11, July the year before. And if you want pics from the lunar surface, and not from Apollo, then you still need to look up the Lunokhod program. The pics look rather familiar.
By the way, the United States wasn't really far behind the USSR. The US was able to orbit a satellite before Sputnik ever went up. Aerospace was an American forte before Kennedy ever made his speech.
qed100 3 months ago
@Astronaut890 lol. just like you "know" there's been a moon landing, they "know" there hasn't been one. though the difference between you and them is that they actually have questions
I'm not saying the moon landing isn't real, I don't care. but you can't say with 100% accuracy that everything in this video's real if you don't even know what the fuck's taking place. and I doubt most people with a normal American education do.
viciousrape 3 months ago
@Astronaut890 This video dont prove they went, it can be a fake lightweight hammer or even a weighted feather. Conspiracy theoriest have full right to not believe what they are told, despite it being the truth or not. You can't honestly say we are not lied to every single day. People lie to get their own way. I'm going to stay with an open mind until absolute solid proof. If you think we are not lied to, just look at the last 50 years of who was in power and what they say they would do but didnt
benjyboba 2 months ago
@benjyboba This man's comment speaks for himself
bassbreaker 2 months ago
@benjyboba This is legit in principle, but in practice it can get complicated. Anything you haven't seen with your own eyes could potentially just be a big lie. Ever been to Tristan da Cunha? No? How do you know anyone's been there? How do you know there is such a place? Has anyone walked on the Moon? Maybe yes, maybe no. But take care and keep in mind that the Federal Government does more than just lie to people. It also has to do some real work or the Country will collapse.
qed100 2 months ago
@benjyboba In order to get the time of fall right, a fake hammer would need to be of such low density that it'd reach terminal velocity in a very small fraction of a second. But, at terminal velocity it wouldn't display uniform acceleration during the fall and would be a dead giveaway. A faked heavy, rigid feather has its own problems. In particular, it'd need to display absolutely no drag-induced dynamics. That's not such an easy thing to arrange for an object with the geometry of a feather.
qed100 2 months ago
Space is FUCKING WEIRD.
ThwartedVillainy 3 months ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FAKE!
CutCokeCrack 3 months ago
@CutCokeCrack hope you never meet an astronaut, you would probably get knocked the fuck out.
fawkes78 3 months ago
@fawkes78 FAKE
Canadiankiid93 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fawkes78 hope you never meet an astronaut, you would probably get on your knees and choke on his dick.
CutCokeCrack 3 months ago
Hey a man on the moon describing the experiment hes about to conduct that's pretty interestin- NOPE WADSWORTH CONSTANT WADSWORTH CONSTANT IM A FUCKSHIT
AndOtherSalads 3 months ago 2
Conspiracy theorists are dumb.
Aversoad 3 months ago
It's ridiculous how wadsworth applies to a 48 second video
Robster471 3 months ago
2xWadsworth Constant applies.
shimshimhey 3 months ago
@shimshimhey nobody gives a shit about your gay wadsworth constant. go back to reddit
thorizzle117 3 months ago
wadsworth constante applies
Plankner 3 months ago
"how bout that"?
b3tt3rth4ny0u 3 months ago
How bout that
xUGKxpwnnubs 3 months ago
This is the most blatant attempt at proving the Wadsworth Constant that I have ever seen.
marsneedstowels 3 months ago
Skip to 0.35 to avoid chatter
HappySweeto 3 months ago
Uh fake. Everyone knows they filmed the moon landings on earth.. and unless they did it in a total vacuum that can't possibly be real. OMGWHOWOULDDOTHIS?! -- Predicting the crazys. :P
valkabo 3 months ago
This is my favorite video from the moon. Proves 2 things Galileo was right and these men are on the moon. 2 thumbs up.
ozweblogs 3 months ago
Go on Omegle . com. Ask what happens if you drop a pen on the moon. Lose all faith in man.
UnbelievableMeckers 3 months ago
i would like to see the conspiracy theorists dispute this one.. Feather and hammer is great proof to me they were there...
IsCumaFut2 3 months ago in playlist IsCumaFut2's favorites
at 1st that didnt make sense then i remembered theres no oxygen on the moon /
no air resistance
xTheDeathSaintx 3 months ago
@xTheDeathSaintx
oxygen =/= air
there is mostly nitrogen in our atmosphere, so even if there wasn't any oxygen there would still be air resistance
FilipC124 3 months ago
@FilipC124 ...so i guess what i ment to say was no atmosphere??
xTheDeathSaintx 3 months ago
i hate how both top comments are replies
IfistZOMBIES 3 months ago 57
@IfistZOMBIES No they aren't! :P
Strideo1 3 months ago
@IfistZOMBIES not anymore...
TheA2theustin 3 months ago
How 'bout that?
exxon101 3 months ago
wouldnt the velocity proprietate the friction of the shuttle surface and thus cause and influx of increased acceleration, thus disproportioning the foundation of the shuttle?
TheLilswaggg 3 months ago
Its PHYSICS... on the moon.
Privatesargent 3 months ago
Mission commander Dave Scott, with Jim Irwin and Al Worden.
dks13827 3 months ago
Hmm. I hate Science.. MY Science Teacher Showed me this..
Even though i hate Science.. weird.
Ilovetoact13 4 months ago
How 'bout that?
Cafasaz 4 months ago