JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible. Papacy cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible. Papacy cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
What's wrong Mr. race-hating Zionist? Has Dawkins exposed just how sick your religion is? Truth hurts doesn't it, especially when you base your life on the morally depraved Babylonian Talmud.
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
As least these people spend more time learning and debating rather than wasting time on a corporate-fed pop culture. Perhaps that's why many of them become lawyers and doctors. Too bad they are deluded into thinking that science is OK unless it contradicts their religious "facts."
Simply, they show themselves as cowards when they avoid the immutable facts of science because it "upsets" their belief system. So, they mold science to fit their agenda.
This Rabbi, (so sorry and apologize to say) looks like a caveman. He looks like he has never evolved and is really just a product of his immediate environment. He has only learned what he has been programmed to learn and is passing it down to the next generation.
This video proves that not all Jews are members of the Jewish mafia. In this video, the rabbi is clearly the good guy and Richard Dawkins is the guy who appears to be working for the bad guys. In this video, the rabbi is obviously a man of integrity while Richard Dawkins is obviously lying when he claims that he is concerned for the kids. Dawkins doesn’t care about the kids at all. He’s a fraud.
@dmh497 Yeah, raising kids like mushrooms locked in the dark and fed religious bs rather than real knowledge is great for kids. By all means, raise your kids that way. My kids will need someone to cook their burgers for them.
Hey edmacdaddy when you wuss out and block someone you can't argue with, at least have the courtesy to erase all their comments too..... otherwise you're just a pussy for making a comment then running away. but I'm sure that was the point.
you're a joke for making a video you can't even stand by and a retard for blocking those you can't banter with.... atheism is lame as are you sir.
@ProjectDecade I would of responded to this, but apparently "edmacdaddy" is only man enough to make a comment then block people he can't argue with. Kinda makes him a pussy in my book..... maybe his point is that "atheism" lacks the balls to stand on its own to feet. at least when he blocks me again, you'll know what I mean.
That was really rude and mean. That man was really kind to Richard to give him the time of day. One day to God is a thousand years and is more complexed definition than that . Does God time go by or time. No! Oh- I forgot that he knows it all. Not! Wow -- He distorted evolution theory and calls it a fact. lol
Awww...somebodies getting cranky. Maybe you need a nap, mister. Swearing makes baby Jesus cry.
You look kind of silly throwing a tantrum and calling people stupid when you say things like "to be a scientific theory there must be evidence, otherwise its just a theory"
Nurse, can you change Mr. Maximus and turn on the TV for him.
I am so glad to see someone actually debating rather than becoming offended and defensive or nasty, like most of the christians I've seen. I can respect this Rabbi because of his intelligence, even though I do not agree with him. If only there were more people like this!
I am a Christian and I believe in evolution and the big bang. I do not see the reason why others would deny the proof of the science. I also do not see how some can believe the earth so young when the Archaeology we see dates it back millions of years.
TheIrishRover15 has replied to your comment on Richard Dawkins Virus of Faith:
@edmacdaddy > Well...I also doubt that this rabbi did kill in the name of god;)
As for the "praying on his behind": There are lots of youtube vids where Dawkins is doing exactly this..sitting behind a desk and telling his ideas/persuasion a crow of listeners;)
Excuse me, Mr. Dawkins, --I am sorry, Dr. Dawkins!!! Why do my children spew the theory of evolution ? Richard Dawkins: *#H(*$H(*RRE(*U(E What? Richard Dawkins:*#O(*FH#*# You want me to keep giving them the theory of evolution? (*#U#*U(# You are crazy Mr/Dr. Dawkins. You want to kill my babies. You are not a Doctor. Bye
@romney27 how is atheism "wimpy". as an atheist you have to let go of the "god said it so its true" crap that a majority of the population believes in and think for yourself. As an atheist you have to be able to state your points against people who use antiquated religious dogma as an argument. if anything atheists would be the least concerned with what other people think of them because they are a hated minority by choice. Rebuttals? and you cant use the bible or jesus said.
@yogisdad "free will" includes religion and beliefs in god.
Atheism is a parasitic philosophy relying on the existence of "theism", and as such is insufficient in offering any real value in considering the existential condition inherent to being human.
Science requires one to address the "observed", but atheist only offer "opinion" as to why the observed should be something that is not observed.
why waste your time being concerned with what others believe or don't believe?
@romney27 you keep saying BELIEFS in god, i think you mean belief in godS. that would be more like it. and to crush your logic, may i point out that the church believe that the sun revolved around the earth and many people believed this as well. does that make it true? truth is not a popularity contest.
p.s. why should the world waste their time with what nazis or the taliban or the inquistion priests have to think? thoughts matter, ideas matter. do you not get this?
@MrMegatruth "gods" is accurate, I agree. But maybe science demonstrates better the part that you seem to not get. Placebos are not real either, and are continuously being proven to be very effective by science in the lab. The point is that belief alone can change ones physiology. The more you belief the more it works. It's not a consensus of truth, but a subjective ability to change ones self. You said it yourself "thoughts matter".
@romney27 not physiology, psychology. there is a difference. and i said thought matter because you said they didn't. i am paraphrasing that last statement.
@romney27 wow good point "why waste your time being concerned with what other believe"..I know religious people dont go knocking on doors to tell you what to believe.when was the last time an athiest came to your house,had a T.V. show or asked for your money, talk about parasitic?so ya im with ya keep what you believe to yourself.Keep it outta my schools my courts and wherever else it has been forced on me
@alltie I see dawkins all the time going around telling people what to believe and if he's not doing it for the money, and to feed his own ego, then maybe your point wouldn't be so ironic.
I'm not sure what country you live in, but there is already a separation of church and state in the USA, it's held up in courts for hundreds of years.... kinda makes your argument a mute point.
I do agree about keeping it to yourself, no one likes a whiner...after all atheist seem to have that part covered.
@romney27 really show me one vid of dawkins telling people what to believe..All i ever see him do is show people the errors of the bible and the evidence for evolution.Sparation of church and state..its a good thing and should be taken more seriously.but your right my point is moot..the 10 commandments never appear in a court house...cities never start there town meeting with prayer,you never see any Jesus saves billbrds,in god we trust on your money.LOL ya my point is moot.
@alltiedup217 dawkins telling people "not" what to believe is the same as telling them what to believe. funny he wants to invoke "freedom of thought" but then doesn't get that that includes religion and beliefs in gods. Talk about contradictions.
religion only effects you if you choose to let it. I recommend not being so susceptible to others....not believing in others beliefs to give meaning to ones own life seems seconded rate at best.
@romney27 LOL ..religion only effects you if you let it ..are you hi..tell that to the poeple that were killed on 9/11.Or the kids in texas that are getting there text books re-writen.When has dawkins ever said some is not free to believe what they want..I can think of no threats he's made.yet christains and muslims jew's all have there" do what we say or our god will torture you forever".Talk about 2nd rate.and so much for freedom of thought
@alltiedup217 ....9/11? a religious attack?.... So by that logic america killed a million Iraqi people for god?.... now your susceptibility to the media is starting to show....lol
maybe you should look up the word "geo political"....
Einstein is a jew, does that make relativity religious too?...hahahh
(I don't think you even made it to seconded rate yet, my bad)
@romney27 LOL ya it was ..and then GW.bush said "god" told him to attack iraq ..go look it up it was on the news LOL....your head is soooo far up your ass its not even funny.9/11 geo political..LOL ya thats why the yell god is great before they blow shit up.
@TheMemeline ya so..go back to your 2000 year old myth.LOL geo politics...ya thats what they yell right before they set off a bomb or blow up...oh no its not ..they yell god is great..pppftt geo politics,pull your head from your ass
Your child was born an atheist, will be brainwashed into your beliefs and there's no proof/facts what so ever in which ever god you believe in, and don't give me that "the only one there is" crap!
@edmacdaddy "Your child was born an atheist"...lol that's ridiculous, that would be like saying every dog born is wild at birth, and only becomes domesticated by it's environment.....haha! I can see evolution isn't your strong suit either.
Waste of life? The only waste of life is religion wasting a person's entire one and only life worried about another life after death that there is no proof of whatsoever.
@drche420 Who's worried? it's your over simplification to assume that people are afraid that they will get in trouble for not doing the right thing in this life. existence is already eternal, you never get to a point in the future that you stop having existed. Not to mention that thoughts of an after life are for the living and have been long enough to become inherent to the human condition. Your "opinion" is irrelevant to that fact.
@romney27 you know im an atheist and i actually agreed with your first point, 100%. then i read your second paragraph and realized you are a moron. Oh well...
@romney27 on the contrary atheist make questions an interesting question, atheist gave you a better life by means of science they gave us reason and discard superstition if was for religion we would be in the dark ages and living average 30 to 40 years within a 20 mile radius from we born atheist think for themselves like wolves not like sheep following a herd if you get insulted fine keep following the herd, me i will enjoy the life i have
@romney27 Wimpy? how? learning actualy facts and learning real science that is backed up by facts? teaching a child something since they are born is the same no matter what it is you teach them, weather this be to hate others of different cultures/color or believe in an imaginary friend its all the same....
@romney27 Atheists are often concerned about what religious people think because religion is what produces children that may (among many other bad things) grow up to fly planes into buildings and such...
False. If you knew what a theory is, you wouldn't sound so ignorant. Theories aren't conjecture, theories are based on evidence and theories also have no evidence that disproves them. If a theory is disproven, it is no longer a theory.
@drche420 hey loudmouth, I just looked. You're a 20 year old know-it-all. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR you fucking little twerp. You don't even have a college degree and here you are yapping your ass off as if you're some kind of fucking evolution genius. All you are doing is repeating the bullshit they taught you in the classroom. They are doing a great job of brainwashing you ya fucking dweeb. Your critical thinking skills are shit. Now go read a fucking book asshole.
"Abiogenesis has NOTHING to do with evolution." HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR That's like one crook denying another crook. "I'm not a duck thief, I'm a chicken thief and that's two different things altogether." OR "I didn't rob the bank, I only drove the getaway car and that has NOTHING to do with bank robbery."
may want to quote me correctly, next time. darwinian evolution has nothing to do with abiogenesis as far as the theories are concerned. do you not understand science? there are many conflicting theories on the origin of life, however evolution of the species is accepted by 92% of the scientific community. i know this is hard for you to believe, or accept, but maybe you could explain what theory you believe in. put yourself out there and take a stand, troll.
@MrMegatruth there are no such things as trolls. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
92% of the scientific community? Aren't you aware as to how science works moron? Let me explain. 92% is not good enough. Science is all about one person proving the other 100% wrong. It never works the other way you mentally defective simpleton. You just keep getting PWNED looks like you'd learn to keep your big assed mouth shut dickwad.
Science is not about getting every last scientist to agree with a theory. Science is a process that you clearly don't understand. If 92% of the scientific community agrees on an issue, it is more likely that the other 8% has a personal belief that conflicts with the facts. REgardless what you may think, it is possible for a scientist to be a christian, and dead wrong.
@douchebag420 "it is more likely that the other 8% has a personal belief that conflicts with the facts" OH BULLSHIT, you dummass. Where is your fucking brain? That is pure bullshit. They taught you that just to keep you in line and to keep you from thinking for yourself. Science is 1 person proving the other 100% wrong. If you look at the history of science the herd is always wrong and somebody discovers a new idea while the herd stands around watching.
Very rarely does someone make a discovery that completely disproves the common way of thinking. Most of the time, a new discovery only adds to the current explanations, or corrects a small part of the already understood laws. I won't dabble with name calling, I'll only show you how wrong you are.
@drche420 "abiogenesis and evolution blah blah blah" You really don't understand evolution or science do you? So no. I am not wrong. You don't know your ass from applebutter. Without abiogenesis evolution cannot happen. Do I need to continue humiliating you with this? I can do that if that is what you want. You obviously never read any of my post on this subject. NOR do you know ANYTHING of the history of evolution theory. I suppose you think it's a creationist theory? HAR HAR HAR
I don't have a biology book on hand, nor can I post its entire contents on this message to educate you. So I'll have to settle and ask you to research evolution. Again, I won't stoop to your level of insults, because that's exactly what the person who lacks evidence and reason must resort to. Go ahead, test my knowledge on evolutionary theory, I assure you it won't be copied and paste.
Concerning Abiogenesis: The following statement by the geochemist Jeffrey Bada from San Diego Scripps Institute makes clear the helplessness of evolutionists concerning this impasse: "Today as we leave the twentieth century, we still face the biggest unsolved problem that we had when we entered the twentieth century: How did life originate on Earth?"
correct with the Bada quote, evolutionists do not have an answer to how life began, do you have an answer? but you are talking about two different things, one is abiogenesis and the other is evolution. you can look it up if you want or you can quote mine, the choice is yours. evolutionist DO have an answer to how life diversified into species? what is your theory?
@MrMegamouth, HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR here you are again whining, crying and making excuses for your failure. BTW evolutionist merely MADE UP an answer. They have not the slightest proof for it. Why do I need a theory? Yours is fucked so I need one? HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR and sorry, but your attempt to distance yourself from abiogenesis is proof that it is a failed theory. If it could be proved the evolutionists would be claiming it to be part of evolution. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
1. Even though Darwin himself focused on the origin of species, some scientists have tried to apply the concept of evolution to the first life to form the concept of abiogenesis. In 1924, Russian biochemist Alexander Oparin proposed living cells arose gradually from nonliving matter through a sequence of chemical reactions. According to Oparin, gases present in the atmosphere of primitive earth, when induced by lightening or other sources of energy, would react to form simple organic compounds.
2. These compounds would subsequently self-assemble into increasingly complex molecules such as proteins. These, in turn, would organize themselves into living cells.
are you trying to help me with this cut and paste job? it says it right there in point one. thank you for the help, pwned again. maybe you can quote a scientists from this decade next time.
I haven't seen dawkins mention one good point. "the earth was made in 5000 years is ridiculous" of course it is, im sure the rabbi doesn't think that it would only take 5000 years from the creation of earth to dinosaurs and caveman and now to all happen. He probably just doesn't care for that but dawkins is too obsessed with religion blinding people from fact to make that assumption. And the rabbi was a kid himself and taught the same way so and he is happy and doesn't think it should be changed
your an atheist BUT you feel sorry? what does being an atheist have to do with feelings? did you mean to say AND i feel sorry for the rabbi? dont feel sorry for him he probably feels sorry for you
it is a rebellion against God, some people may have had a very difficult trauma or a near relative who has passed away, or some other things that has happened, and then they may think that no just god could have let such things happen.. the thing is that it is through trials that our faith is most greatly tested,
@Spadaji I cannot rebel against something that is not there anymore than you cannot insult the boogieman. I stopped believing in God gradually as a child who grew up to realize that the only time I ever thought I heard my prayers being answered I was only desperately trying to convince myself. I felt and sensed nothing short of my own imagination.
No one choses to be an atheist. More like we discover that we ARE atheists. I wish I could believe in a god, but I like think sometimes, and thinking kind of ruins the whole "faith" thing.
@douche420 No, you don't think moron. You only think you think. All you think is what some Marxist asshole told you in the classroom. If you were a thinker at all you wouldn't be an atheist nor would you believe in evolution. Your claim to discover is bullshit. You didn't discover shit, but every atheist has to say that to make themselves feel better.
Dawkins doesnt have an opinion. His comments are fact, substatiated by millions of years of evolution, wind erosion, DNA, carbon dating, decay of matter, gravity, cells, mathematics, fossil records, scientific theories that have been tested, stretched, weighed, measured, observed, observed through electron microscopes, etc and backed up by millions and millions of pieces evidence left behind. And what scientific evidence does religion have? NOTHING. ZILCH. ZERO.
what do you mean whta scientific evidence does religion have? in islam mahamub said he saw a vision in a cave and every muslim to this day believes in that. so obviously evidence has nothing to do religion dumbass
I think Dawkins is entitled to his opinion but what he accuses others of i bet he is guilty of himself. Does he open his own family to diverse views including creationism and religion or does he preach, believe only in what you can prove. Seems to me he is no different to those who he seeks to criticise. The difference is he is coming from a different point of view.
Maybe im being unfair but no matter how much I agree or disagree with him I just find him such an unlikable weazle
Well true. He probably would look at his family like they were idiots if they believe something else. But Dawks doesn't put them in a special school where they will be told one thing and one thing only... I think a lot of atheist understand a lot more of other religions than any of the religious groups.
But there is a massive difference in faith and fact. They are not equal. Creationism is not equal to evolution. One is based entirely on faith and fantasy; the other is based on facts and evidence. Dawkins is all about evidence, and he will go to where it leads.
I totally agree glitter0007. The scientific community often points its finger at us saying that we are being academically closed minded by teaching our children Creationism, or what have you. But does Dawkins himself promote the idea of investigating all the areas for yourself?? Believing in a scientific theory (or according to Dawkins, a scientific fact) is a matter of faith and/or opinion. Scientists must have as much or more faith than religious peoples.
@abigailm32 Wrong ... Lmao... Evolution is actually a fact but exactly how it works is the theory just like gravity is both a theory and fact but yet no one says the theory of gravity. Believing in things supported by evidence requires no faith
but you have shown your bias in many other posts, to ignore any piece of evidence that contradicts a 2000 year old superstition is not empirical science.
Actually you are being myopic and narrow minded. As you refuse to study anything that conflicts with naturalistic science. I have degrees in secular/evolutionary science and I work in the field everyday. I not only play with the big boys I work with them and have degrees with them. My view is much broader than yours as I study both sides of the equation and do not limit my study as you do. You may play with the little kids as I have graduated and am immersed daily with the fray.
Wrong! Gravity is not understood fully but it is testable and demonstrable something that evolution is not. I was at a seminar where Donald Johanson (Lucy) was speaking and he tried to make the same comparison, it is not valid.
@creationcamp evolution is not testable and demonstrable? WOW.. everyone, you are now a witness to someone who actually said that... wow, dude you have no knowledge about evolution well do you?
Show me how it is testable and demonstrable....go ahead and try. You do not understand the theory and its flaws and fallacies very well at all, obviously.
@apathy7170 when talking evolution you have micro and macro and micro is tested and proven.. so yes evolution is tested and proven in that sense... For the macro part it cannot be directly observed (of course cause it happens over thousands, millions of years) but there are methods macroevolution can be tested using molecular techniques, genomic analyses, methods of population genetics, sequence data, etc. this is more on the theory part of evolution, I'm aware of that.But it's not untestable.
Micro is variation within a genus, it is not evolution. We see variables within humans & animals, but evolution requires transmutation of a Genus. Macro is not tested with any success which is what is required, repeatable tests. The stasis model or survival by preservation of the species "as is" is seen; not with beneficial mutations 4 advancement. Genome analysis such as mtDNA Adam/Eve inclusive of pop. displacement and seq. data support creation timelines/distribution/design.
God "stretched out the heavens, what evo's call inflation, God just did it amazingly fast, but we still do not understand light, and God made it so it obeys His commands. The vastness of the heavens are a testament to the vastness of the Creator. The fountains of the deep broke open, the major undersea fault lines we see. I am in oil drilling and the amount of water under the Earth is vast. Also, the mtns and valleys were flat b4 the flood, less ice caps lower land levels.
Kinds would fall under genus; such as all canines coming from wolves. Because of loss of genetic information wolves cannot breed with chihuahuas but even evo's agree a wolf type animal was the ancestor of modern canines.
you are okay with variations within a specie right? so i a specie changed one tiny part every hundred years for a million years, would that creature look like the starting creature? but or course you think the earth is only 6000 years old, and because you think this way, you are excluded from serious scientific inquiry
Only to your view of scientific inquiry. I study the same science and have different outcomes, it is no less scientific or scholarly. If the earth is very old many problems r created, in fact many more than if the earth is young. The science fits more neatly with a young earth model, but then you have to allow for supernatural intervention n no evo will do that because it would mean if a Creator; then rules 2 live by, n that is no fun. Same science different conclusions; worldview.
if you quote scripture, it is less scientific. you should be ashamed to call yourself a scientist. science only fits neatly if you bend the laws of nature. not very scientific
The laws of nature are bent by the evo's' let's see Boyle's gas law, 2nd of Thermo, law of mass action, spontaneous generation, mathematical probability to name just a few.
@MrMegatruth "take your time and tell me how evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics?" HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR you can't explain it asshole so why the fuck are you asking him? HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR You've already had your ass spanked over this one. And here you are acting as if you know something about it!!! HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR YOU fucking moron!
@apathy7170 Spontaneous generation or Equivocal generation is an obsolete theory regarding the origin of life from inanimate matter, which held that this process was a commonplace and everyday occurrence, as distinguished from univocal generation, or reproduction from parent(s). The theory was synthesized by Aristotle.
bolye's gas law, second law of thermodynamics, law of mass action - ALL apply in a closed or isolated systems, the earth is an open system. i cannot believe that you would fail that badly. or maybe you think the earth is a closed system, if that is the case, please explain how the earth, with energy supplied by the sun, is a closed system? you cannot believe in creationism without bending or breaking scientific laws.
The Earth is an open system inside of a closed universe. The closed model is theoretical, but we are still inside of it. The open system model has never not proven to act as a closed system. It always behaves as a closed system as it is in a closed universe and it is all we are able to test. The silly evo argument does not hold true, as all of the tests are in an open system and hold as true as if in a purely closed system. So the evo argument against it is false.
If you cannot understand that the open system we live in has ALWAYS behaved as a closed system and never not behaved that way; I cannot help you. What we test is in an open system, it's behavior is indicative of the theoretical closed system of the universe or a controlled environment test, either way it always acts the same way.
@MrMegaMouth said, "you need to stop the bullshit, and get a proper education" HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR YOU piss ant idiot. All you are is a big mouthed pussy. I guess you thought you'd sneak over here and hide from me and run your mouth some more. HAR HAR HAR HAR YOU are TOTALLY PWNED.
So again your arguments fail short of any validity, I did not fail; you did...again. Only evolutionism breaks natural laws that we see today. Considering that both creationism and evolutionism broke them in "the beginning". What we see today does not support evolutionism it supports creationism.
@apathy7170 This pathetic creature with a big assed mouth is a moron. He doesn't have a clue as to what he's talking about. Go to Intellignet Design's Nightmare and you'll see the entire discussion between him and me. He knows shit about evolution and proved it to the whole world. He's a dipshit, a cry baby, and if you want I will send you the entire evolution test he took and you can see for yourself how fucking ignorant he really is. BTW he failed the question about 2nd LoT. HAR HAR HAR HAR
send the test to whoever you want. i am not a scientist, i have not lied in my answers, but you claim to have taught for 40 years, what subject did you teach? are you scared to answer? i do not why, unless you are lying about it. that would make sense. but i have figured out what religion you are, you are a scientologist, you want the intelligent design theory because it fits your belief, you hate creationism, and will not tell your religion. your turn
@MrMegamouth, I have no need to prove to you how long I have taught or what I have taught. My words are proof of my ability to EXPOSE YOU. You're a loudmouthed asshole. You brag about your education. You act as if you know everything while my simple little pop quiz on evolution EXPOSED you as a know-nothing moron. You just keep scratching for material to do an ad hominem. That's funny. You're lame. You have been PWNED HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
Everything I said made sense, even if you don't like it...and about spontaneous generation, yes, evolutionism believes in it; it's called abiogenesis. Thank you for proving my point by reminding yourself and other evo's that life can never come from non life. That is a fact that evolutionism can not get past. Oh, and no stars can form due to Boyle's gas law, that is one reason we have never seen one form, another problem for evolutionism. Dark matter and anti matter...endless list.
evolution is not abiogenesis. it is a separate theory. you can look it up, it is not part of darwinian evolution. darwin hypothesized abiogenesis in the origins of the species, but did not formulate a theory. even Answer in Genesis and CRI ministries say that you should not use the 2nd law of thermodynamics in a creationists argument. it is a failed argument, we live in an open system, there fore the second law does not apply.
@MrMegamouth, Now try this question again that you failed. Fail it here for everyone to see. How does the sun as an energy source demerit the argument that evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics? Feel the sting asshole? HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
@MrMegatruth no asshole. This makes you a liar. I didn't bring up creationism in the answer. I didn't even bring up the answer. FAIL AGAIN MORON. Now here you are accusing me of failing my own test! HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR Dickhead, face it, you failed. Your TEST SCORE is 7%. What a fucking dummy.
@MrMegamouth said, "evolution is not abiogenesis." HAR HAR HAR HAR here you go again popping off about shit you don't know anything about. Listen shithead, evolution is not abiogenesis, but abiogenesis IS evolution you fucking illiterate moronic piece of shit! Russian evolutionist Alexander I. Oparin, said this in his book The Origin of Life, published in 1936: "Unfortunately, the origin of the cell remains a question which is actually the darkest point of the complete evolution theory"
example: how can you scientifically explain how lights traveled faster than the speed of light? how can light get to the earth in 6000 years? you cannot use a supernatural skydaddy in your answer
First of all, You limit yourself to only naturalistic means, that is the hope of all evo's; but the problem is that their science still does not work with only naturalism. Light is not a constant; it is primarily to us, and for calculations, but light speeds up and slows down near large gravitational bodies. We can speed up and slow down and even stop light in laboratories, not much of a constant. To go further, even inflation does not explain the time neded 4 the vastness of space
@edmacdaddy > Well...I also doubt that this rabbi did kill in the name of god;)
As for the "praying on his behind": There are lots of youtube vids where Dawkins is doing exactly this..sitting behind a desk and telling his ideas/persuasion a crow of listeners;)
Richard Dawkins is the world's only hope. Unfortunately, he will not be enough. Religions like Islam are the virus, democracy is the host and political correctness is the conduit.
That's a very dark, but possibly dead accurate assessment. The only hope is to wake up the moderate masses who sort of shrug their shoulders and say, "Hey, we should be tolerant of religion."
firstly, i am atheist. io was brought up in a ewish family and private jewish school
i was fortunate that neither were extremely orthodox. the school shownm is teaching things not accepted by most jews.
jews are told to question their rabi's and not believe them. which is something this guy is stupid about. and the tora says that time did not exist b4 ppl. so 6 days is just a way of separating time so children can learn. but they must be eventually taught the truth.
All you need to do to become an atheist is read the bible , you will soon see that these are story's from unintelligent superstitious men
living in tents in the sands of the middle east .
How can anyone in the year 2009 still believe in this rubbish , open your eyes and see it for what it is , a bunch of money grubbing ass wipes that still want to control the masses with fear and lies .
toytopetao, this will never be for one thing humans are what they will be for the rest of their lives.What are u saying they will evolve into something else?Jesus said Till heaven and earth pass away one jot shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.Everything u read here has to come to pass,we won't go away.God's word will always remain.U however will not.David said the fool said in his heart their is no God.See a man wise in his own conceit?their is more hope for a fool thehim
You are the stupid people I'm referring in my last message. I was christian until I was 17. My fathers made me a brainwash, thanks to me I could get rid of that bullshit
I want to know if they have created the religion police yet? Thats what must be kept in order to keep people completly blinded by their religion and what they are told.
This has been flagged as spam show
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
GET READY FOR THE GREAT WARNING NOW!!!
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 4 weeks ago
Hmmm. Why is Dawkins to pussy to debate Dr William Lane Craig?
Anyone? Anyone?
Dawkins the Coward.
TruthOverFact 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible. Papacy cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
SpencerBenedict2nd 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible. Papacy cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
SpencerBenedict2nd 3 months ago
@MrBenYochai
But the Babylonian Talmud says that girls become of sexual age at three.....
What's "moral" about that?
OrthodoxDarwinist 5 months ago
@MrBenYochai
What's wrong Mr. race-hating Zionist? Has Dawkins exposed just how sick your religion is? Truth hurts doesn't it, especially when you base your life on the morally depraved Babylonian Talmud.
OrthodoxDarwinist 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
Judaism isn't the problem. Religious superstition is the problem. Belief in invisible magical superfriends is the problem. I am atheist.
ndrthrdr1 8 months ago
#LOL they shake hands toooo muuuch ahahaha 1:11
unkhl3 9 months ago 3
As least these people spend more time learning and debating rather than wasting time on a corporate-fed pop culture. Perhaps that's why many of them become lawyers and doctors. Too bad they are deluded into thinking that science is OK unless it contradicts their religious "facts."
Simply, they show themselves as cowards when they avoid the immutable facts of science because it "upsets" their belief system. So, they mold science to fit their agenda.
interluk 11 months ago
All these profound arguments over youtube no one has the balls to say to eachother as strangers face to face. WOW!
4dOp 11 months ago
hehe their hair is funny
lololol
Shirleyxia74 1 year ago
I like how theses people assume that they aren't atheist, when they are atheist against other gods, unless they believe in Thor etc...!
edmacdaddy 1 year ago 6
Never seen anyone wasting so much time trying to tell the others God doesn't exist. Way to waste your lifetime.
tomkingsbridge 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tomkingsbridge dawkins is just frustrated because there are people who don't believe in his "god". #LOL
unkhl3 9 months ago 2
This Rabbi, (so sorry and apologize to say) looks like a caveman. He looks like he has never evolved and is really just a product of his immediate environment. He has only learned what he has been programmed to learn and is passing it down to the next generation.
Jexka007 1 year ago
This video proves that not all Jews are members of the Jewish mafia. In this video, the rabbi is clearly the good guy and Richard Dawkins is the guy who appears to be working for the bad guys. In this video, the rabbi is obviously a man of integrity while Richard Dawkins is obviously lying when he claims that he is concerned for the kids. Dawkins doesn’t care about the kids at all. He’s a fraud.
dmh497 1 year ago
@dmh497 Yeah, raising kids like mushrooms locked in the dark and fed religious bs rather than real knowledge is great for kids. By all means, raise your kids that way. My kids will need someone to cook their burgers for them.
osgeek 1 year ago
@dmh497 `
whats your basis for that ?
misteryman5 1 year ago
Dawkins brings the phrase "Think of the children!" to a whole new level.
RichardForkins 1 year ago
I feel pity for the children. Because those children will do the same thing to their own children in the future.
ThisIDIsTheLongestID 1 year ago
As a former ultra orthodox jew , Richard is 100% correct
the torah so called "laws" is false , it took me 6 long years
to study and comper facts of science and non facts of religion
-
As an atheist , i am happy and joyful , no one can take it from me.
-
The world need more people like Richard Dawkins
-
באהבה מישראל , דוקינס אתה הכי טוב שיש !
msokherewego1 1 year ago 18
@msokherewego1
what does the last sentence mean ? if you don't mind me asking.
misteryman5 1 year ago
Typical Christain aren't ya there TheMemeline.
I have no need to argue with you, I'm not the on who believes in bronge age myths.
edmacdaddy 1 year ago
Hey edmacdaddy when you wuss out and block someone you can't argue with, at least have the courtesy to erase all their comments too..... otherwise you're just a pussy for making a comment then running away. but I'm sure that was the point.
you're a joke for making a video you can't even stand by and a retard for blocking those you can't banter with.... atheism is lame as are you sir.
TheMemeline 1 year ago
@ProjectDecade I would of responded to this, but apparently "edmacdaddy" is only man enough to make a comment then block people he can't argue with. Kinda makes him a pussy in my book..... maybe his point is that "atheism" lacks the balls to stand on its own to feet. at least when he blocks me again, you'll know what I mean.
TheMemeline 1 year ago
That was really rude and mean. That man was really kind to Richard to give him the time of day. One day to God is a thousand years and is more complexed definition than that . Does God time go by or time. No! Oh- I forgot that he knows it all. Not! Wow -- He distorted evolution theory and calls it a fact. lol
youngsinfo 1 year ago
Or how about that old gem "natural selection is just a fancy term for death."
Or "if evolution were true, people would have radar like bats."I think we found the ass. Its Maximus. And is squirting out applebutter.
Nurse, we need a change of Depends for Mr. Maximus.
odinata 1 year ago
Awww...somebodies getting cranky. Maybe you need a nap, mister. Swearing makes baby Jesus cry.
You look kind of silly throwing a tantrum and calling people stupid when you say things like "to be a scientific theory there must be evidence, otherwise its just a theory"
Nurse, can you change Mr. Maximus and turn on the TV for him.
odinata 1 year ago
I am so glad to see someone actually debating rather than becoming offended and defensive or nasty, like most of the christians I've seen. I can respect this Rabbi because of his intelligence, even though I do not agree with him. If only there were more people like this!
spikutus 1 year ago
I am a Christian and I believe in evolution and the big bang. I do not see the reason why others would deny the proof of the science. I also do not see how some can believe the earth so young when the Archaeology we see dates it back millions of years.
MrMiket102 1 year ago
@MrMiket102
Because genesis says it was created in 6 days not thousands of millions.
Science contradicts the old testament.
DSD1v57BG32 1 year ago
TheIrishRover15 has replied to your comment on Richard Dawkins Virus of Faith:
@edmacdaddy > Well...I also doubt that this rabbi did kill in the name of god;)
As for the "praying on his behind": There are lots of youtube vids where Dawkins is doing exactly this..sitting behind a desk and telling his ideas/persuasion a crow of listeners;)
The spanish inquisition.?
edmacdaddy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Excuse me, Mr. Dawkins, --I am sorry, Dr. Dawkins!!! Why do my children spew the theory of evolution ? Richard Dawkins: *#H(*$H(*RRE(*U(E What? Richard Dawkins:*#O(*FH#*# You want me to keep giving them the theory of evolution? (*#U#*U(# You are crazy Mr/Dr. Dawkins. You want to kill my babies. You are not a Doctor. Bye
Airlightf 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
richard why not let me decide how to raise your kids.... that makes perfect sense...lol
atheism is such a wimpy philosophy, always concerned with what other people are thinking. What a waste of ones life.
romney27 1 year ago
@romney27 how is atheism "wimpy". as an atheist you have to let go of the "god said it so its true" crap that a majority of the population believes in and think for yourself. As an atheist you have to be able to state your points against people who use antiquated religious dogma as an argument. if anything atheists would be the least concerned with what other people think of them because they are a hated minority by choice. Rebuttals? and you cant use the bible or jesus said.
yogisdad 1 year ago
@yogisdad "free will" includes religion and beliefs in god.
Atheism is a parasitic philosophy relying on the existence of "theism", and as such is insufficient in offering any real value in considering the existential condition inherent to being human.
Science requires one to address the "observed", but atheist only offer "opinion" as to why the observed should be something that is not observed.
why waste your time being concerned with what others believe or don't believe?
romney27 1 year ago
@romney27 you keep saying BELIEFS in god, i think you mean belief in godS. that would be more like it. and to crush your logic, may i point out that the church believe that the sun revolved around the earth and many people believed this as well. does that make it true? truth is not a popularity contest.
p.s. why should the world waste their time with what nazis or the taliban or the inquistion priests have to think? thoughts matter, ideas matter. do you not get this?
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth "gods" is accurate, I agree. But maybe science demonstrates better the part that you seem to not get. Placebos are not real either, and are continuously being proven to be very effective by science in the lab. The point is that belief alone can change ones physiology. The more you belief the more it works. It's not a consensus of truth, but a subjective ability to change ones self. You said it yourself "thoughts matter".
romney27 1 year ago
@romney27 not physiology, psychology. there is a difference. and i said thought matter because you said they didn't. i am paraphrasing that last statement.
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@romney27 wow good point "why waste your time being concerned with what other believe"..I know religious people dont go knocking on doors to tell you what to believe.when was the last time an athiest came to your house,had a T.V. show or asked for your money, talk about parasitic?so ya im with ya keep what you believe to yourself.Keep it outta my schools my courts and wherever else it has been forced on me
alltiedup217 1 year ago
@alltie I see dawkins all the time going around telling people what to believe and if he's not doing it for the money, and to feed his own ego, then maybe your point wouldn't be so ironic.
I'm not sure what country you live in, but there is already a separation of church and state in the USA, it's held up in courts for hundreds of years.... kinda makes your argument a mute point.
I do agree about keeping it to yourself, no one likes a whiner...after all atheist seem to have that part covered.
romney27 1 year ago
@romney27 really show me one vid of dawkins telling people what to believe..All i ever see him do is show people the errors of the bible and the evidence for evolution.Sparation of church and state..its a good thing and should be taken more seriously.but your right my point is moot..the 10 commandments never appear in a court house...cities never start there town meeting with prayer,you never see any Jesus saves billbrds,in god we trust on your money.LOL ya my point is moot.
alltiedup217 1 year ago
@alltiedup217 dawkins telling people "not" what to believe is the same as telling them what to believe. funny he wants to invoke "freedom of thought" but then doesn't get that that includes religion and beliefs in gods. Talk about contradictions.
religion only effects you if you choose to let it. I recommend not being so susceptible to others....not believing in others beliefs to give meaning to ones own life seems seconded rate at best.
romney27 1 year ago
@romney27 LOL ..religion only effects you if you let it ..are you hi..tell that to the poeple that were killed on 9/11.Or the kids in texas that are getting there text books re-writen.When has dawkins ever said some is not free to believe what they want..I can think of no threats he's made.yet christains and muslims jew's all have there" do what we say or our god will torture you forever".Talk about 2nd rate.and so much for freedom of thought
alltiedup217 1 year ago 4
@alltiedup217 ....9/11? a religious attack?.... So by that logic america killed a million Iraqi people for god?.... now your susceptibility to the media is starting to show....lol
maybe you should look up the word "geo political"....
Einstein is a jew, does that make relativity religious too?...hahahh
(I don't think you even made it to seconded rate yet, my bad)
romney27 1 year ago
@romney27 LOL ya it was ..and then GW.bush said "god" told him to attack iraq ..go look it up it was on the news LOL....your head is soooo far up your ass its not even funny.9/11 geo political..LOL ya thats why the yell god is great before they blow shit up.
alltiedup217 1 year ago
@alltiedup217 jews don't believe in hell and you don't understand geo politics
TheMemeline 1 year ago
@TheMemeline ya so..go back to your 2000 year old myth.LOL geo politics...ya thats what they yell right before they set off a bomb or blow up...oh no its not ..they yell god is great..pppftt geo politics,pull your head from your ass
alltiedup217 1 year ago
@romney27
Free will?
TURN OOR BURN...lol
Your right, thats 'free will' alright.
Now I wont shoot you in in the head with this gun as long as you say you love me...lmfao
edmacdaddy 1 year ago
@romney27
EVERYone is agnositc!
EVERY single person on this planet. The only difference is if you are theist leaning or atheist leaning.
Wake up, stop using the same faulty logic you are whining about
Assaultpredator 1 year ago
@romney27
Your child was born an atheist, will be brainwashed into your beliefs and there's no proof/facts what so ever in which ever god you believe in, and don't give me that "the only one there is" crap!
edmacdaddy 1 year ago 20
@edmacdaddy "Your child was born an atheist"...lol that's ridiculous, that would be like saying every dog born is wild at birth, and only becomes domesticated by it's environment.....haha! I can see evolution isn't your strong suit either.
TheMemeline 1 year ago
@TheMemeline yes, domesticated is what you are
NScott45 1 year ago
@romney27
Waste of life? The only waste of life is religion wasting a person's entire one and only life worried about another life after death that there is no proof of whatsoever.
drche420 1 year ago
@drche420 Who's worried? it's your over simplification to assume that people are afraid that they will get in trouble for not doing the right thing in this life. existence is already eternal, you never get to a point in the future that you stop having existed. Not to mention that thoughts of an after life are for the living and have been long enough to become inherent to the human condition. Your "opinion" is irrelevant to that fact.
romney27 1 year ago
@romney27
Wrong.
While I exist, I am not dead. And when I am dead, I no longer exist..
When I am dead, I will have existed in the past, but I will not exist anymore.
For same reason that my clone will not be me, the remains of my body won't be me either.
Plus, you're wrong to think that the threat of hellfire is oversimplified.
drche420 1 year ago
@romney27 you know im an atheist and i actually agreed with your first point, 100%. then i read your second paragraph and realized you are a moron. Oh well...
AWSH17 1 year ago
@romney27 So, what religion or philosophy do you belong to then? If you're against atheism you've got to be religious or just an egoistic prick.
dadov 1 year ago
@romney27 on the contrary atheist make questions an interesting question, atheist gave you a better life by means of science they gave us reason and discard superstition if was for religion we would be in the dark ages and living average 30 to 40 years within a 20 mile radius from we born atheist think for themselves like wolves not like sheep following a herd if you get insulted fine keep following the herd, me i will enjoy the life i have
legolasgreenleaff 11 months ago
@romney27 Wimpy? how? learning actualy facts and learning real science that is backed up by facts? teaching a child something since they are born is the same no matter what it is you teach them, weather this be to hate others of different cultures/color or believe in an imaginary friend its all the same....
Juan25toni 9 months ago
@romney27 Atheists are often concerned about what religious people think because religion is what produces children that may (among many other bad things) grow up to fly planes into buildings and such...
DarthZillasaurus 5 months ago
A theory is made of up thousands of FACTS, what theory/facts does you 'god' have?
edmacdaddy 1 year ago
@edmacdaddy theories are made up of "conjecture", theorist can't imagine "facts".... so much for that idea.
But here's a fact for you smart guy... religion and beliefs in god exist.
you're 0 for 2
romney27 1 year ago
@romney27
False. If you knew what a theory is, you wouldn't sound so ignorant. Theories aren't conjecture, theories are based on evidence and theories also have no evidence that disproves them. If a theory is disproven, it is no longer a theory.
drche420 1 year ago
@drche420 hey loudmouth, I just looked. You're a 20 year old know-it-all. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR you fucking little twerp. You don't even have a college degree and here you are yapping your ass off as if you're some kind of fucking evolution genius. All you are doing is repeating the bullshit they taught you in the classroom. They are doing a great job of brainwashing you ya fucking dweeb. Your critical thinking skills are shit. Now go read a fucking book asshole.
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MaximusArurealius
I don't need to be an evolutionary genious, or have a degree to know that you have no clue what a theory is.
drche420 1 year ago
PUBLIC NOTICE, ATTENTION FOLKS:
dickwadmouth aka megamouth, believes in trolls. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
"Abiogenesis has NOTHING to do with evolution." HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR That's like one crook denying another crook. "I'm not a duck thief, I'm a chicken thief and that's two different things altogether." OR "I didn't rob the bank, I only drove the getaway car and that has NOTHING to do with bank robbery."
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MaximusArurealius
may want to quote me correctly, next time. darwinian evolution has nothing to do with abiogenesis as far as the theories are concerned. do you not understand science? there are many conflicting theories on the origin of life, however evolution of the species is accepted by 92% of the scientific community. i know this is hard for you to believe, or accept, but maybe you could explain what theory you believe in. put yourself out there and take a stand, troll.
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth there are no such things as trolls. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
92% of the scientific community? Aren't you aware as to how science works moron? Let me explain. 92% is not good enough. Science is all about one person proving the other 100% wrong. It never works the other way you mentally defective simpleton. You just keep getting PWNED looks like you'd learn to keep your big assed mouth shut dickwad.
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MaximusArurealius
Science is not about getting every last scientist to agree with a theory. Science is a process that you clearly don't understand. If 92% of the scientific community agrees on an issue, it is more likely that the other 8% has a personal belief that conflicts with the facts. REgardless what you may think, it is possible for a scientist to be a christian, and dead wrong.
drche420 1 year ago
@douchebag420 "it is more likely that the other 8% has a personal belief that conflicts with the facts" OH BULLSHIT, you dummass. Where is your fucking brain? That is pure bullshit. They taught you that just to keep you in line and to keep you from thinking for yourself. Science is 1 person proving the other 100% wrong. If you look at the history of science the herd is always wrong and somebody discovers a new idea while the herd stands around watching.
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MaximusArurealius
Very rarely does someone make a discovery that completely disproves the common way of thinking. Most of the time, a new discovery only adds to the current explanations, or corrects a small part of the already understood laws. I won't dabble with name calling, I'll only show you how wrong you are.
drche420 1 year ago
@MaximusArurealius
Actually, you're wrong. Abiogenesis and evolution are two completely different concepts. Before you criticize someone, do some research.
drche420 1 year ago
@drche420 "abiogenesis and evolution blah blah blah" You really don't understand evolution or science do you? So no. I am not wrong. You don't know your ass from applebutter. Without abiogenesis evolution cannot happen. Do I need to continue humiliating you with this? I can do that if that is what you want. You obviously never read any of my post on this subject. NOR do you know ANYTHING of the history of evolution theory. I suppose you think it's a creationist theory? HAR HAR HAR
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MaximusArurealius
I don't have a biology book on hand, nor can I post its entire contents on this message to educate you. So I'll have to settle and ask you to research evolution. Again, I won't stoop to your level of insults, because that's exactly what the person who lacks evidence and reason must resort to. Go ahead, test my knowledge on evolutionary theory, I assure you it won't be copied and paste.
drche420 1 year ago
Concerning Abiogenesis: The following statement by the geochemist Jeffrey Bada from San Diego Scripps Institute makes clear the helplessness of evolutionists concerning this impasse: "Today as we leave the twentieth century, we still face the biggest unsolved problem that we had when we entered the twentieth century: How did life originate on Earth?"
- Jeffrey Bada, Earth, February 1998, p. 40
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MaximusArurealius
correct with the Bada quote, evolutionists do not have an answer to how life began, do you have an answer? but you are talking about two different things, one is abiogenesis and the other is evolution. you can look it up if you want or you can quote mine, the choice is yours. evolutionist DO have an answer to how life diversified into species? what is your theory?
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegamouth, HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR here you are again whining, crying and making excuses for your failure. BTW evolutionist merely MADE UP an answer. They have not the slightest proof for it. Why do I need a theory? Yours is fucked so I need one? HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR and sorry, but your attempt to distance yourself from abiogenesis is proof that it is a failed theory. If it could be proved the evolutionists would be claiming it to be part of evolution. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
1. Even though Darwin himself focused on the origin of species, some scientists have tried to apply the concept of evolution to the first life to form the concept of abiogenesis. In 1924, Russian biochemist Alexander Oparin proposed living cells arose gradually from nonliving matter through a sequence of chemical reactions. According to Oparin, gases present in the atmosphere of primitive earth, when induced by lightening or other sources of energy, would react to form simple organic compounds.
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
2. These compounds would subsequently self-assemble into increasingly complex molecules such as proteins. These, in turn, would organize themselves into living cells.
IT'S ALL A FAILURE
We now call it The Frankenstein Program
HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MaximusArurealius
are you trying to help me with this cut and paste job? it says it right there in point one. thank you for the help, pwned again. maybe you can quote a scientists from this decade next time.
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegamouth, you can't even write a coherent comment. Who can know what the fuck you're talking about asshole?
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
I haven't seen dawkins mention one good point. "the earth was made in 5000 years is ridiculous" of course it is, im sure the rabbi doesn't think that it would only take 5000 years from the creation of earth to dinosaurs and caveman and now to all happen. He probably just doesn't care for that but dawkins is too obsessed with religion blinding people from fact to make that assumption. And the rabbi was a kid himself and taught the same way so and he is happy and doesn't think it should be changed
xxSeaTownTrout 1 year ago
@xxSeaTownTrout I am an atheist myself but i feel sorry for the rabbi at the end.
lufsen142 1 year ago
your an atheist BUT you feel sorry? what does being an atheist have to do with feelings? did you mean to say AND i feel sorry for the rabbi? dont feel sorry for him he probably feels sorry for you
xxSeaTownTrout 1 year ago
Comment removed
Akroify 1 year ago
Even when I'm atheist and I support Dawkins, I feel he was a bit rude at the end and feel sorry for the rabbi.
not that being atheist have to do something with feelings.
Akroify 1 year ago
why do you choose to be atheist?
xxSeaTownTrout 1 year ago
one of the reasons may be that many religions claims to be the real one and that every other religion is just false. how are we supposed to know?
And because it doesn't make much sense to me. I see more convincing evidence from other theories like evolution.
anyways... if there's a god, wouldn't he understand why am I atheist?
Akroify 1 year ago
it is a rebellion against God, some people may have had a very difficult trauma or a near relative who has passed away, or some other things that has happened, and then they may think that no just god could have let such things happen.. the thing is that it is through trials that our faith is most greatly tested,
Spadaji 1 year ago
@Spadaji I cannot rebel against something that is not there anymore than you cannot insult the boogieman. I stopped believing in God gradually as a child who grew up to realize that the only time I ever thought I heard my prayers being answered I was only desperately trying to convince myself. I felt and sensed nothing short of my own imagination.
DamienZshadow 1 year ago
@xxSeaTownTrout
No one choses to be an atheist. More like we discover that we ARE atheists. I wish I could believe in a god, but I like think sometimes, and thinking kind of ruins the whole "faith" thing.
drche420 1 year ago
@douche420 No, you don't think moron. You only think you think. All you think is what some Marxist asshole told you in the classroom. If you were a thinker at all you wouldn't be an atheist nor would you believe in evolution. Your claim to discover is bullshit. You didn't discover shit, but every atheist has to say that to make themselves feel better.
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@xxSeaTownTrout because this is not a debate or much of discussion it's rather a interview
xxRockst4r 1 year ago
@xxSeaTownTrout
Jesus is Santa Claus for adults.
drche420 1 year ago
Dawkins doesnt have an opinion. His comments are fact, substatiated by millions of years of evolution, wind erosion, DNA, carbon dating, decay of matter, gravity, cells, mathematics, fossil records, scientific theories that have been tested, stretched, weighed, measured, observed, observed through electron microscopes, etc and backed up by millions and millions of pieces evidence left behind. And what scientific evidence does religion have? NOTHING. ZILCH. ZERO.
stevjen1 1 year ago
what do you mean whta scientific evidence does religion have? in islam mahamub said he saw a vision in a cave and every muslim to this day believes in that. so obviously evidence has nothing to do religion dumbass
xxSeaTownTrout 1 year ago
I think Dawkins is entitled to his opinion but what he accuses others of i bet he is guilty of himself. Does he open his own family to diverse views including creationism and religion or does he preach, believe only in what you can prove. Seems to me he is no different to those who he seeks to criticise. The difference is he is coming from a different point of view.
Maybe im being unfair but no matter how much I agree or disagree with him I just find him such an unlikable weazle
glitter0007 1 year ago
@glitter0007
Well true. He probably would look at his family like they were idiots if they believe something else. But Dawks doesn't put them in a special school where they will be told one thing and one thing only... I think a lot of atheist understand a lot more of other religions than any of the religious groups.
DrMu5tCh3at2W1n 1 year ago
But there is a massive difference in faith and fact. They are not equal. Creationism is not equal to evolution. One is based entirely on faith and fantasy; the other is based on facts and evidence. Dawkins is all about evidence, and he will go to where it leads.
spatzilly 1 year ago
I totally agree glitter0007. The scientific community often points its finger at us saying that we are being academically closed minded by teaching our children Creationism, or what have you. But does Dawkins himself promote the idea of investigating all the areas for yourself?? Believing in a scientific theory (or according to Dawkins, a scientific fact) is a matter of faith and/or opinion. Scientists must have as much or more faith than religious peoples.
abigailm32 1 year ago
@abigailm32 Wrong ... Lmao... Evolution is actually a fact but exactly how it works is the theory just like gravity is both a theory and fact but yet no one says the theory of gravity. Believing in things supported by evidence requires no faith
xxRockst4r 1 year ago
@xxRockst4r
If you believe evolutionism is a fact, then you have blinded yourself to the truth and believe in consensual science not empirical science.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@apathy7170 just google, "evolution" and read like 30 seconds and you will allready figure out it's a fact. good luck in life. God b. less
xxRockst4r 1 year ago
@apathy7170
but you have shown your bias in many other posts, to ignore any piece of evidence that contradicts a 2000 year old superstition is not empirical science.
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
Hello, how are you? We both have our biases as we have astutely stated. I'm not sure that I understand your question or statement.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@apathy7170
you will not accept any evidence that conflicts with the bible, therefore you have to leave the big boy table and go play with the little kids.
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
Actually you are being myopic and narrow minded. As you refuse to study anything that conflicts with naturalistic science. I have degrees in secular/evolutionary science and I work in the field everyday. I not only play with the big boys I work with them and have degrees with them. My view is much broader than yours as I study both sides of the equation and do not limit my study as you do. You may play with the little kids as I have graduated and am immersed daily with the fray.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@xxRockst4r
Wrong! Gravity is not understood fully but it is testable and demonstrable something that evolution is not. I was at a seminar where Donald Johanson (Lucy) was speaking and he tried to make the same comparison, it is not valid.
creationcamp 1 year ago
@creationcamp evolution is not testable and demonstrable? WOW.. everyone, you are now a witness to someone who actually said that... wow, dude you have no knowledge about evolution well do you?
xxRockst4r 1 year ago
@xxRockst4r
Show me how it is testable and demonstrable....go ahead and try. You do not understand the theory and its flaws and fallacies very well at all, obviously.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@apathy7170 when talking evolution you have micro and macro and micro is tested and proven.. so yes evolution is tested and proven in that sense... For the macro part it cannot be directly observed (of course cause it happens over thousands, millions of years) but there are methods macroevolution can be tested using molecular techniques, genomic analyses, methods of population genetics, sequence data, etc. this is more on the theory part of evolution, I'm aware of that.But it's not untestable.
xxRockst4r 1 year ago
@xxRockst4r
Micro is variation within a genus, it is not evolution. We see variables within humans & animals, but evolution requires transmutation of a Genus. Macro is not tested with any success which is what is required, repeatable tests. The stasis model or survival by preservation of the species "as is" is seen; not with beneficial mutations 4 advancement. Genome analysis such as mtDNA Adam/Eve inclusive of pop. displacement and seq. data support creation timelines/distribution/design.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@apathy7170
how does the starlight reach the earth if the earth is only 6000 years old?
The Genesis flood: Where did all that water come from? Where did it go?
Has Creationism ever made a true prediction ?
What is the physical evidence that species cannot evolve beyond "kinds" ?
Which leads to the next question, define "kinds?"
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
God "stretched out the heavens, what evo's call inflation, God just did it amazingly fast, but we still do not understand light, and God made it so it obeys His commands. The vastness of the heavens are a testament to the vastness of the Creator. The fountains of the deep broke open, the major undersea fault lines we see. I am in oil drilling and the amount of water under the Earth is vast. Also, the mtns and valleys were flat b4 the flood, less ice caps lower land levels.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
Kinds would fall under genus; such as all canines coming from wolves. Because of loss of genetic information wolves cannot breed with chihuahuas but even evo's agree a wolf type animal was the ancestor of modern canines.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@apathy7170
you are okay with variations within a specie right? so i a specie changed one tiny part every hundred years for a million years, would that creature look like the starting creature? but or course you think the earth is only 6000 years old, and because you think this way, you are excluded from serious scientific inquiry
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
Only to your view of scientific inquiry. I study the same science and have different outcomes, it is no less scientific or scholarly. If the earth is very old many problems r created, in fact many more than if the earth is young. The science fits more neatly with a young earth model, but then you have to allow for supernatural intervention n no evo will do that because it would mean if a Creator; then rules 2 live by, n that is no fun. Same science different conclusions; worldview.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@apathy7170
if you quote scripture, it is less scientific. you should be ashamed to call yourself a scientist. science only fits neatly if you bend the laws of nature. not very scientific
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
The laws of nature are bent by the evo's' let's see Boyle's gas law, 2nd of Thermo, law of mass action, spontaneous generation, mathematical probability to name just a few.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@apathy7170
take your time and tell me how evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics? and then why not explain the others in detail.
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth "take your time and tell me how evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics?" HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR you can't explain it asshole so why the fuck are you asking him? HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR You've already had your ass spanked over this one. And here you are acting as if you know something about it!!! HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR YOU fucking moron!
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@apathy7170 Spontaneous generation or Equivocal generation is an obsolete theory regarding the origin of life from inanimate matter, which held that this process was a commonplace and everyday occurrence, as distinguished from univocal generation, or reproduction from parent(s). The theory was synthesized by Aristotle.
key word-obsolete
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@apathy7170
bolye's gas law, second law of thermodynamics, law of mass action - ALL apply in a closed or isolated systems, the earth is an open system. i cannot believe that you would fail that badly. or maybe you think the earth is a closed system, if that is the case, please explain how the earth, with energy supplied by the sun, is a closed system? you cannot believe in creationism without bending or breaking scientific laws.
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
The Earth is an open system inside of a closed universe. The closed model is theoretical, but we are still inside of it. The open system model has never not proven to act as a closed system. It always behaves as a closed system as it is in a closed universe and it is all we are able to test. The silly evo argument does not hold true, as all of the tests are in an open system and hold as true as if in a purely closed system. So the evo argument against it is false.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@apathy7170
WHAT?????
you need to stop the bullshit, and get a proper education.
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
If you cannot understand that the open system we live in has ALWAYS behaved as a closed system and never not behaved that way; I cannot help you. What we test is in an open system, it's behavior is indicative of the theoretical closed system of the universe or a controlled environment test, either way it always acts the same way.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@MrMegaMouth said, "you need to stop the bullshit, and get a proper education" HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR YOU piss ant idiot. All you are is a big mouthed pussy. I guess you thought you'd sneak over here and hide from me and run your mouth some more. HAR HAR HAR HAR YOU are TOTALLY PWNED.
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
So again your arguments fail short of any validity, I did not fail; you did...again. Only evolutionism breaks natural laws that we see today. Considering that both creationism and evolutionism broke them in "the beginning". What we see today does not support evolutionism it supports creationism.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@apathy7170 This pathetic creature with a big assed mouth is a moron. He doesn't have a clue as to what he's talking about. Go to Intellignet Design's Nightmare and you'll see the entire discussion between him and me. He knows shit about evolution and proved it to the whole world. He's a dipshit, a cry baby, and if you want I will send you the entire evolution test he took and you can see for yourself how fucking ignorant he really is. BTW he failed the question about 2nd LoT. HAR HAR HAR HAR
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MaximusArurealius
send the test to whoever you want. i am not a scientist, i have not lied in my answers, but you claim to have taught for 40 years, what subject did you teach? are you scared to answer? i do not why, unless you are lying about it. that would make sense. but i have figured out what religion you are, you are a scientologist, you want the intelligent design theory because it fits your belief, you hate creationism, and will not tell your religion. your turn
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegamouth, I have no need to prove to you how long I have taught or what I have taught. My words are proof of my ability to EXPOSE YOU. You're a loudmouthed asshole. You brag about your education. You act as if you know everything while my simple little pop quiz on evolution EXPOSED you as a know-nothing moron. You just keep scratching for material to do an ad hominem. That's funny. You're lame. You have been PWNED HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
Everything I said made sense, even if you don't like it...and about spontaneous generation, yes, evolutionism believes in it; it's called abiogenesis. Thank you for proving my point by reminding yourself and other evo's that life can never come from non life. That is a fact that evolutionism can not get past. Oh, and no stars can form due to Boyle's gas law, that is one reason we have never seen one form, another problem for evolutionism. Dark matter and anti matter...endless list.
apathy7170 1 year ago
@apathy7170
evolution is not abiogenesis. it is a separate theory. you can look it up, it is not part of darwinian evolution. darwin hypothesized abiogenesis in the origins of the species, but did not formulate a theory. even Answer in Genesis and CRI ministries say that you should not use the 2nd law of thermodynamics in a creationists argument. it is a failed argument, we live in an open system, there fore the second law does not apply.
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegamouth, Now try this question again that you failed. Fail it here for everyone to see. How does the sun as an energy source demerit the argument that evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics? Feel the sting asshole? HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MaximusArurealius
remember this is the question that you failed as well by bringing up creationism in the answer. you failed your own test. what a complete dipshit.
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth no asshole. This makes you a liar. I didn't bring up creationism in the answer. I didn't even bring up the answer. FAIL AGAIN MORON. Now here you are accusing me of failing my own test! HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR Dickhead, face it, you failed. Your TEST SCORE is 7%. What a fucking dummy.
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@MrMegamouth said, "evolution is not abiogenesis." HAR HAR HAR HAR here you go again popping off about shit you don't know anything about. Listen shithead, evolution is not abiogenesis, but abiogenesis IS evolution you fucking illiterate moronic piece of shit! Russian evolutionist Alexander I. Oparin, said this in his book The Origin of Life, published in 1936: "Unfortunately, the origin of the cell remains a question which is actually the darkest point of the complete evolution theory"
FAIL
MaximusArurealius 1 year ago
@apathy7170
example: how can you scientifically explain how lights traveled faster than the speed of light? how can light get to the earth in 6000 years? you cannot use a supernatural skydaddy in your answer
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth
First of all, You limit yourself to only naturalistic means, that is the hope of all evo's; but the problem is that their science still does not work with only naturalism. Light is not a constant; it is primarily to us, and for calculations, but light speeds up and slows down near large gravitational bodies. We can speed up and slow down and even stop light in laboratories, not much of a constant. To go further, even inflation does not explain the time neded 4 the vastness of space
apathy7170 1 year ago
fuck muslims
ArabPeninsula0 1 year ago
unless he is right and then what happens to all who don't believe?
ekshaffer4 1 year ago
Unless you have the wrong god?
edmacdaddy 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
richard dawkins is just as religious as that rabbi..
murk4heart 2 years ago
How so? Has he ever killed in in the name of athesiesm? or praying on his behind instead of getting out and doing something about it?
edmacdaddy 1 year ago
@edmacdaddy > Well...I also doubt that this rabbi did kill in the name of god;)
As for the "praying on his behind": There are lots of youtube vids where Dawkins is doing exactly this..sitting behind a desk and telling his ideas/persuasion a crow of listeners;)
TheIrishRover15 1 year ago
@murk4heart Justify your ignorant comment please?
shashintokyo 1 year ago
dougmoen "Religions like Islam are the virus"
PLZZZ, all religions are viruses...period!
edmacdaddy 2 years ago
Richard Dawkins is the world's only hope. Unfortunately, he will not be enough. Religions like Islam are the virus, democracy is the host and political correctness is the conduit.
We are doomed.
dougmoen 2 years ago
That's a very dark, but possibly dead accurate assessment. The only hope is to wake up the moderate masses who sort of shrug their shoulders and say, "Hey, we should be tolerant of religion."
uccomic 1 year ago
that was a handjob of a handshake!
infinityjrh 2 years ago 2
"We believe that god created the world, in 6 days"
You would think he could do it instantly... he is, after all, God right? Right?
A 5000 year old earth is hilarious too.
lemonademango777 2 years ago 2
firstly, i am atheist. io was brought up in a ewish family and private jewish school
i was fortunate that neither were extremely orthodox. the school shownm is teaching things not accepted by most jews.
jews are told to question their rabi's and not believe them. which is something this guy is stupid about. and the tora says that time did not exist b4 ppl. so 6 days is just a way of separating time so children can learn. but they must be eventually taught the truth.
jkjkjij22 2 years ago
This Rabi is a fool like most religious fanatics .
adlerbr12 2 years ago 5
All you need to do to become an atheist is read the bible , you will soon see that these are story's from unintelligent superstitious men
living in tents in the sands of the middle east .
How can anyone in the year 2009 still believe in this rubbish , open your eyes and see it for what it is , a bunch of money grubbing ass wipes that still want to control the masses with fear and lies .
adlerbr12 2 years ago 8
Here, here! My fellow Canuck!
uccomic 2 years ago
thank you ,lol.
adlerbr12 2 years ago
@uccomic Canuck ! :)
Topazeyesdazzleme 1 year ago
Human society will evolve only when stupid religions (and stupid people who belive them) dessapear
TOYTOPETAO 2 years ago 14
toytopetao, this will never be for one thing humans are what they will be for the rest of their lives.What are u saying they will evolve into something else?Jesus said Till heaven and earth pass away one jot shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.Everything u read here has to come to pass,we won't go away.God's word will always remain.U however will not.David said the fool said in his heart their is no God.See a man wise in his own conceit?their is more hope for a fool thehim
MsBREATHOFLIFE 2 years ago
You are the stupid people I'm referring in my last message. I was christian until I was 17. My fathers made me a brainwash, thanks to me I could get rid of that bullshit
TOYTOPETAO 2 years ago
@TOYTOPETAO great point;)
MiuraUU 2 years ago
First thing is to forbid them access to every aspect of science in society, froom computer to medicine...
Acrimonator 2 years ago
@TOYTOPETAO At least when I disappear I'll be with God in his kingdom of heaven.
mdeonx16 1 year ago
@mdeonx16 Ok, sounds nice
TOYTOPETAO 1 year ago
I want to know if they have created the religion police yet? Thats what must be kept in order to keep people completly blinded by their religion and what they are told.
Pureintensity1 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Explain how life arose from non-life. ...
That's why I believe that GOD "is".
loveroflife365 2 years ago