I think as systems like google earth will be increaseingly usefull for AR as their datasets expand...particularly with 3D data, allowing outdoor tracking easier. I see Microsoft Photosyth and varents potentialy being very usefull as well. (gps on the device gets rough location, compass gives facing direction, then using a pointmap of local buildings could give a precise location and tracking...with some very complex software, of course)
pas mal cette maniére de faire du tracking c'est vraiment à creusé comme idée les architectes apréciront, mais c sur qu'avec votre system temp réel ca pourrait être révolutionnaire.
Yes I took a screenshot. I imported it in my calibration tool. I superimposed the virtual golf course over the Google Earth screenshot. And then you see the tracking on the real video with this data. I added some words in the description to try to be more meaningful.
You would normally need aerial shots to do your calibrations. But by using Google Earth to fly virtually, you can do your calibrations using the virtual aerial shots instead.
That's it. The idea is that you simply cannot ask a blimp to go anywhere at will in order to prepare your tracking over a large area, while you can do anything you want with Google Earth. Alas, with all the crowds, the temporary buildings, etc., that appear during events, it is not straightforward. So, although Google Earth can provide rough calibration, there still will be needs for final calibration done on the fly, in my opinion.
Nice work. I see a lot of potential in this.
I think as systems like google earth will be increaseingly usefull for AR as their datasets expand...particularly with 3D data, allowing outdoor tracking easier. I see Microsoft Photosyth and varents potentialy being very usefull as well. (gps on the device gets rough location, compass gives facing direction, then using a pointmap of local buildings could give a precise location and tracking...with some very complex software, of course)
twdarkflame 2 years ago
pas mal cette maniére de faire du tracking c'est vraiment à creusé comme idée les architectes apréciront, mais c sur qu'avec votre system temp réel ca pourrait être révolutionnaire.
Meteotrance 4 years ago
you opened up Google Earth and took a screenshot, yes?
I'm having trouble figuring out what you used Google Earth for, even from the description
roidroid 4 years ago
Yes I took a screenshot. I imported it in my calibration tool. I superimposed the virtual golf course over the Google Earth screenshot. And then you see the tracking on the real video with this data. I added some words in the description to try to be more meaningful.
EmmanuelMFr 4 years ago
ah i see now.
You would normally need aerial shots to do your calibrations. But by using Google Earth to fly virtually, you can do your calibrations using the virtual aerial shots instead.
roidroid 4 years ago
That's it. The idea is that you simply cannot ask a blimp to go anywhere at will in order to prepare your tracking over a large area, while you can do anything you want with Google Earth. Alas, with all the crowds, the temporary buildings, etc., that appear during events, it is not straightforward. So, although Google Earth can provide rough calibration, there still will be needs for final calibration done on the fly, in my opinion.
EmmanuelMFr 4 years ago