Added: 3 years ago
From: soupdragon42
Views: 7,027
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Let's face it, science really can't describe plasma - and when it tries to do so, out comes bullshit. For starters, plasma is neither matter nor energy.

  • Of course it never dawned on Einstein and his minions that the universe is altogether electrical. His followers, to this day, still refuse to acknowledge that plasma is neither matter nor energy. In fact, it could be said the matter and energy are convenient fictions of Einstein and his thralls who have only succeeded in mathematizing metaphysical speculation otherwise called cosmology.

  • good & effective---If we take this info and logically apply it in an all inclusive form to our Milky Way, we get currents inflowing in a spiral manner from both arms of the galaxy, being stored from the center outward until the storage coil is so charged it cannot hold more, then the center AGN (plasma focus) activates and discharges all at once in the form of two opposite jets.

    The storage of charge compresses all, heliospheres and matter. We experience this compression in 5,000 y repeats.

  • There is a link between electrical potential and future potential of the observer within their own reference frame. As the wave function continuously collapses and reforms electric charge move relative to the collapse. We see and feel this continuous alternating between wave and particle as the continuous flow of time. Just like the tick tock, tick tock of a clock the continuous wave particle, wave particle represents the physical flow of time itself!

  • the electric currents on the diagram look like crop circles!

  • Dumb distracting and stupid soundtrack, spoils a good visual.

  • If you plot -cos(x)/x*x (you can replace x with sqrt[x*x+y*y] for a 3-d plot) and position the ring of a ring galaxy at the radius of the 2nd minima of this hypothetical permanent, galactic-core-defined gravitational potential wave-well that's "permanent " in the sense that it doesn't oscillate over time at any point in space, but oscillates in space instead. The idea is to give the graviton a wavelength and to consider the galactic core as a dominant coherent source of phase-0 gravitons.

  • The steady-state quantum gravity rule I'd use multiplies GmM/r^2 (Newton) by cos(kr), where k (in radians) = 2pi/[d(p)/Fp(G/EM)], where d(p)=~10^-15m is corrected proton diameter and Fp(G/EM)=~10^-36 is the ratio of gravitational to electromagnetic forces between two motionless protons. This gives one wavecycle (2pi radians) per ~10^21 meters, around 60K LY, which is maybe about the radius of Hoag's ring, the Sombrero's ring and the MW galaxy.

  • The plasma-based simulation of galaxy formation is interesting and it seems there is something to it, but leaving out gravity only goes so far and I also think there is a significant property of galactic-scaled gravity that is not widely-known, a quantum gravity property that generates a steady-state wave, rippling the classical 1/r^2 gravity well landscape with a wavelength ~10^21m derived by a variation on Dirac's large numbers hypothesis using proton diameter times proton EM/G force-ratio.

  • One thing Hannes invented 1954 not known to the public is an atomic coocer making direct current. It´s not bigger than a half cubic meter and totally harmless for the environment, one could have it in a garden powerful enough to run hundreds of houses for at least 10-20 years before filling it up.

  • @mrkontra Would you elaborate on this subject. As I have followed experiments on free energy circuits and have had good success. They actrually work.

  • Yes indeed they are alive...magnetism is awareness of plasma and they operate within each individual 'I'...That is what third eye is all about _ individual electromagnetic center which could hold plasma _ enlightenment!

    Computer needs electricity... so does the Moon _ Outer magnetic conductor for the current _ to turn on and work...in other words our blood plasma is frozen within the moon as if male freezes inside female to manifest body on earth...

  • Comment removed

  • Wonderful informative & animation!

  • This is similar to the history of cancer research. Science sure surges and backtracks, often ignoring the founders of a movement.

  • you might want to examine Tesla.

  • @ammasdevotee See my Tesla video

  • What the name of the song from minute 3:48.

  • Any physicist will tell you that the electromagnetic force is 10^39 times more powerful than the gravitational force. That's a thousand billion billion billion billion times stronger. So what forces control the Universe -- gravitational or electrical? Every electric current produces a magnetic field, and you can't have one without the other.

  • The strong force which holds protons together is also stronger, than electric charge at a close distance of less than 2.5 proton diameters. So I guess some forces do not weaken at the same ratio to distance as do others. What is the relation of distance to gravity versus distance to electric charge or magnetism ?

  • Hi Definitionofis,

    Newton's law of gravity and Coulomb's law of electromagnetism are identical. F = GmM / r2 and F = kqQ / r2. Both forces drop off as the square of the distance, but while Newton uses mass, Coulomb uses charges. Newton discovered his law 99 years before Coulomb. Coincidence?

  • I'm sorry to bother you.

    But do you happen to know the equation for distance and the strong nuclear force ?

    If it is an inverse square relation too, then I am misunderstanding something about forces, which I would like to learn.

  • Here is some information you may find useful: strong nuclear forces behave as if they were very weak, because the kinetic energy of 2 nucleons that stay within strong force range is greater than the depth of the potential well holding them together. This kinetic energy is (1/2) u v^2 > or = h^2 / 8 u R^2, where u is is reduced mass = m1m2/(m1 +m2) and R is distance between nucleons. h is Planck's constant. Hope this helps.

  • This is outright stupidity! There are no "main stream astronomers" that I know of, that are totally disregarding the elements of electromagnetism. And the analogy with calling a flashlight a water spout is incredibly ignorant. Water is not connect to light as magnetism is to currents. I can agree that the nomenclature is sometimes not very intuitive, but it does not mean that people are wrong. Scientists do not just listen to a name and go from that. At least not the scientist I know.

  • Another wrongful assumption is that the "non-thermal" radiation all comes from synchrotron radiation. Inverse compton scattering is something that is viewed increasingly as an important effect. For theorise of synchrotron radiation, see for example Fabbiano et al: "An X-ray survey of a complete sample of 3CR radio galaxies" (1984, ApJ), for an argumentation of inverse compton scattering, I refer to Laskar et al: "Inverse Compton X-rays from Giant Radio Galaxies at z~1" (2009 arXiv)

  • Hmmm.. That should be "scientists" and not "scientist" in my first post.

  • "Filamentary, my dear Watson!"

    Superb video, pervaded by empirical truths.

  • I remember this song from back in the day. It was on a ministry of sound compilation but I can't remember the name.

  • Totally off topic, but who's behind the music in your vids? its good stuff, especially this one, I'd love to know the name of the song and the artist behind it, thanks.

    And I have to say the EU model seems a damn sight more sensical than the relitavistic model thats the mainstream.

  • What's the song? Elegant video as well...

    Wishing there was further investigation into these matters...

    See my videos "Inquiry into the implications of reality"

  • Great man! Great vid!

  • sigh

    The elegant beauty of Alfven's work and mind are intoxicating.

  • I thing you are struggling to reveal a "secret "(electric multi-verse) purposely kept hidden from the public in order for CORPORATE and ORGANISED RELIGION to maintain their control and power over the enslaved public by non sense black-hole and gravity fantasy. Dan Winter has also interesting theories not very far from yours...♠

    Maybe this might mess-up someone cheque books?

  • There is no clandestine conspiracy at work. All of human development has suffered these kinds of problems. It's the very nature of the marketplace of ideas -- a self-reinforcing system. I vaguely remember a Nobel Prize having gone out to work done in this area of Economics about 6 years ago... Just sayin.

  • ...and what is the title of this Nobel Prized Economics work? (hope the author has not connection what so ever with Jesuits (any priesthood) and Corporation? otherwise we are here dealing again with the same school-of-thought who is looting and exploiting this planet in hope to fulfill its insatiable greed, instead of let freely expand life force throughout the universe.

  • Try Google, but stay away from those woo-woo conspiracy websites, they are taking over the rational center of your mind.

    Freely expanding life force? I saw that movie. Turns out it was life sucking vampires.

  • @marneedear Yes. As I often state: Never attribute to conspiracies what can be more easily accounted for by ignorance. The real question is: Are we dealing with wilful ignorance or just the absence of learning?

  • Must everything be a government conspiracy!?

    I highly doubt that anyone in Politics has figured this out and is keeping it from us merely as a means to rub our noses in it..

    Religious leaders doubly so! The Big Bang model could prove to be correct one day but I feel it is in danger of becoming a doctrine rather than a hypothesis.

  • how could the universe possibly be considered neutral? Even in the closet? I'm not educated but I read alot... sound therapy has demonstrated ; to me, everything is energy ... frequency... thoughts, emotions..totally completely charged. how could all that exist in a neutral environment.....What's your take on Tom Bearden? Love your music selections.

  • Well, mainstream astronomy prefers to ignore the role of electricity as this might mess-up their pretty equations

    Tom Bearden's work sounds interesting. I will check it out

  • If you look at the field of space plasma physics you will see more E&M. Electricity is only ignored here when solar wind is tenuous enough so that the charged electrons and ions move freely enough to cancel out the voltage, once the plasma approaches an object such as the Earth is slows and bunches up. Then you get into an area of science filled with currents.

  • The reason fluid mechanics is used to explain things is because while we know equations such as the Vlasov equation are reality, we do not have the computing power needed to compute such an equation. Thus we have found my modeling the system in a magneto-hydrodynamical system (MHD) we can simulate most of the phenomena we observe until we can get better technology.

  • You should look at Kivelson and Russell's Introduction to Space Physics for more about the field of space physics since I think this is more the field you are interested in.

    But nice video... and I agree with you that the field of astronomy does tend to vastly over simplify problems.

  • @soupdragon42 ya Tom Bearden is intense. He has a new website. Its chenere something. but google definitely has it.

  • @petriedishxscapee If you read alot, then it seems you must be very educated. It's probably the best and most responsible to take your education (and the programming of your mind) into your own hands.

  • Science is electrifying.

  • Suggestive

    Amusing

    Hypnotic

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more