Funny Wing Chun why did he keep aiming his head since he is at a height disadvantage...Centreline principle should aim the shortest distance between him and the opponent instead he expose himself by upward punching...0.0
You can't even call that Ving Tsun. His structure is very bad. Look at his stance and arms. For example his toes are pointing outwards instead of inside. His stance isn't even mobile.
@hikitsuzuku Lol. It's correct that he never stood a chance in his state. But if he really knew Ving Tsun and has experience, his stucture wouldn't be that poor. When a person lose or win, it is not the style who caused it. It's the person who can execute the style in a way that is efficient and efffective for him or her. It's also possible that the teacher didn't taught him well (not logical theories etc.).
@hikitsuzuku It's still not an argument. People like you don't understand it. It's not about the style but a persons understanding. Say whatever you want, I don't care bout it anymore (people like you are too arrogant)...........
@hikitsuzuku why u remove comment? pick any wing chun guy you want against a cotto or a hatton and they will get killed. no gloves to help the wing chun style. pick the best wing chun has. fact is wing chun limits different punches and has no head movement. lol.
@RockLee268 That makes very little sense. You're saying this guy wasn't fighting poorly, he just wasn't able to make his crappy style fight correctly?
@TheTerrorUforgot I'm not saying he's fighting good. Do you know there are different Ving Tsun styles, please do some research before you make a comment. Or read my comments better before doing that. And by the way, I'm not even saying that boxing is a bad thing. I like a lot of fighting styles. I just hate when people misunderstand each other and saying that his or her style is better.
@TheTerrorUforgot I agree with you that some style are more efficient and effective then others. But you can't just say that one is better than other, it also depends on how the fighter responds at what kind of techniques he or her learned and many other factors.
@TheTerrorUforgot It's true there are cult-like or similair jokes. Nowadays, people want to make easy money. For example a person learned about 2 years (style) from (teacher). He then took off and create an own system and pretend he has learn secrets from his teacher no one ever has learned. The system changed a lot from the original one. Effectiveness and efficiency has decreased for an amount of level.
@RockLee268 Effectiveness of a style can be determined from a few critea, in my opinion. From those it is really up to personal preference, body type, and scenario. I'm of the opinion styles without contact striking and some form of sparring are immediately in a lower tier. Schools of Wing Chun, Aikido, taekwondo, karate, or others than just hit air or do compliant drills are NOT in Muay Thai, BJJ, Western Boxing, or Judo's league based on that principle alone.
@TheTerrorUforgot You can't that about all styles of Karate because some focus on hard conditioning and full-contact sparring just like Muay Thai. A perfect example of this would be Kyokushin. There's also a relatively unknown Karate style called Daido Juku - which seriously is on par with any stand-up and grappling style around.
Sigh, you're not going to get to be really fast and attack the eyes throat or disable shit if you cant stay conscious long enough. To the boxer that won the fight by such a long way, I'm glad you taught the guy a lesson in striking. I find the best place for Kung Fu is the weekly rental section of blockbuster
The guy is not using Wing Chun and I don't notice a single WC move. To fight a boxer you need to be really fast and attack his throat, eyes and disable one of his arms or legs. All martial arts have their own advantage and disadvantage , it's all depend on that person how much he knows and practice . So stop saying Kung Fu is useless !
@diulesing7 i dont agree to wat ur saying because bruce lee didnt switch to jeet kuen do he just wanted to learn another type of kung fu and i think all types of martial art is equally in power it only depends on the person using it
Once again, all these so called masters had been proven to be useless and fucked. I do believe there are legit kung fu practioners but come on, wtf is all this, poor guy couldnt throw a fucking punch properly.
It does show to other people, what is good and useful to train and what is not. Stand firmly, look straight to your opponent, set up game plan to hit him back, when he strike, is a free and model fighting. Muay Thai or Bokator invent to do such.
It does show to other people, what is good and useful to train and what is not. Stand firmly, look straight to your opponent, set up game plan to hit him back, when he strike. A free style fighting was invent by the Khmer king to come against the Mongolian Kublai Khan force, and it is still useful today, sanda, and footbox as well as kick boxing are from this style know as Muay Thai or bokator
Boxer dude is quick never mind the range. WC guy leaped too much and didn't break boxer dudes timing. Needed to go to the body more then he would have had a decent chance. Too concerned with hitting him in the face, tisk tisk.
"with the exception of donnie yen, I have never seen anyone who practices wing chun win"
I wanted to translate this comment for english speakers because it was so funny... and true. Wing Chun fighters constantly focus on fighting and boast about fighting...but when they fight it is hard to ever find anyone who doesn't just get embarrassed. I am sure there are good fighters out there, probably the ones who aren't going around starting fights?
There are plenty of sifu, lol. The problem is these guys have no fundamental understanding of basic covering their chin while stepping in... stupidly enough they get clocked on their way in. This is what WINGCHUN MASTERY is, not realising that you should not be sticking your chin in the air against a tall fighter when punching. All I see is WC guy throwing punches and having no escape plan nor defense after he misses... very bad.
He shouldn't call himself a sifu, well to b honest most of the so call wing chun sifu they do not know the princples of wing chun. there are no such perfect kung fu out there it all depends on how good the person are!!
A REAL FIGHTER, will NEVER EVER try to fight your enemies FIRST! That's WingChun's Rule, forget? 武德的意义还没多少人搞懂... 在道德上的同时，你先出手，法律不会帮你，而且你先出手的情况下，容易丧失重心。
This also is not wing chun,come on,got any wing chun real fight?Where is the leg stance?Where is the tang sao,the 1st rule of wing chun,1 attack 1 defence,where is that?Only attack?that is not wing chun,don't make wing chun look like a idiot pls.
@mvpo86 he's not being defensive. He's just not wasting energy throwing punches that cannot do damage. in fact he's always pressuring the wc guy to corners. He's the more relaxed fighter of the two.
That's Why i Dont Like Authentic Wingchun, i like Non authentic Wingchun whichis Has modified and Added Some Other Arts. i Like Thechinaboxer Method. be Realize. that some Tradisional Arts is Hard to addapted
boxing is way more practical in real fights. it has a straight forward method of defense and offense. It's very powerful in standard fighting rules. One punch is enough to take opponent out when it lands. many of the Chinese Martial Arts are not for practical fighting. They focus on forms and for shows, or self-exercise. MMA is the most powerful style, like Bruce Lee, the founder of MMA.
CMA are not for practiccal fighting?! The styles are still around today are proven in combat, otherwise they would have disappeared as noone would have learnt them. You have to learn forms but then extract the techniques and use them as necessary, not posture 1 into posture 2 etc. That's the classical mess BL talked about. Most martial arts teach forms etc then go straight into kickboxing, bouncing up and down stuff. They never learn to fight their style.
@rogue9915 BL didn't invent MMA. Most styles have an origin story something like, "Master So and So of style X was unbeatable until he tried to beat up a 300 year old man, who put him on his arse. After 2 years of begging, he was accepted as a student and combined the two styles to form a new style that was all the rage". He just reminded people that no one style has it all and you need to train your weak areas more than your strengths. MMA fighters are superb athletes.
Funny Wing Chun why did he keep aiming his head since he is at a height disadvantage...Centreline principle should aim the shortest distance between him and the opponent instead he expose himself by upward punching...0.0
diesopain 1 day ago
the master of wing chun he dunt even use wing chun to fight,so corrupted
remsey123 3 days ago
條友西完簡过果然好吃....
VE7123 4 days ago
兩個都是愛打不打的...悶= =
INPXify 1 week ago
Please everyone, have an open mind, I learnt boxing before I learnt Ving Tsun.
SifuWongShunLeung 1 week ago
The Boxing guy had an advantage from the beginning with his height and reach. He also looks to be in great shape as well.
FoneArc 1 week ago
look at the height and age difference
louiey 1 week ago
體型差太多了拉，對詠春來講，體型不能差太多，不然李小龍怎麼會發明截拳道。
good0226 1 week ago
懶得講武術,
光看體型,年齡就知道沒有可比性~
96169QQ 1 week ago
若不是"李小龍", 我就不知道什麼是詠春啦.
ec97531 1 week ago
nice counter
MrYasuoPsycho 2 weeks ago
You can't even call that Ving Tsun. His structure is very bad. Look at his stance and arms. For example his toes are pointing outwards instead of inside. His stance isn't even mobile.
RockLee268 2 weeks ago
@RockLee268 haha cmon. he never stood a chance.
hikitsuzuku 2 weeks ago
@hikitsuzuku Lol. It's correct that he never stood a chance in his state. But if he really knew Ving Tsun and has experience, his stucture wouldn't be that poor. When a person lose or win, it is not the style who caused it. It's the person who can execute the style in a way that is efficient and efffective for him or her. It's also possible that the teacher didn't taught him well (not logical theories etc.).
RockLee268 2 weeks ago
@RockLee268 nope wing chun is gay compared to boxing. your argument in irrelevent. lolol
hikitsuzuku 2 weeks ago
@hikitsuzuku What's your argument (no I don't have one, because I know nothing)?
RockLee268 2 weeks ago
@RockLee268 pick the best wing chun chink master or whatever you want and put him up against any midlevel pro boxer and he will get his ass kicked.
hikitsuzuku 1 week ago
Comment removed
RockLee268 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hikitsuzuku It's still not an argument. People like you don't understand it. It's not about the style but a persons understanding. Say whatever you want, I don't care bout it anymore (people like you are too arrogant)...........
RockLee268 1 week ago
@hikitsuzuku why u remove comment? pick any wing chun guy you want against a cotto or a hatton and they will get killed. no gloves to help the wing chun style. pick the best wing chun has. fact is wing chun limits different punches and has no head movement. lol.
hikitsuzuku 1 week ago
@RockLee268 That makes very little sense. You're saying this guy wasn't fighting poorly, he just wasn't able to make his crappy style fight correctly?
TheTerrorUforgot 1 week ago
@TheTerrorUforgot I'm not saying he's fighting good. Do you know there are different Ving Tsun styles, please do some research before you make a comment. Or read my comments better before doing that. And by the way, I'm not even saying that boxing is a bad thing. I like a lot of fighting styles. I just hate when people misunderstand each other and saying that his or her style is better.
RockLee268 1 week ago
@RockLee268 Some styles are better. It's naive to assume they're all equal. Look at Dillman Karate, for example. It's a cult-like joke.
TheTerrorUforgot 1 week ago
@TheTerrorUforgot I agree with you that some style are more efficient and effective then others. But you can't just say that one is better than other, it also depends on how the fighter responds at what kind of techniques he or her learned and many other factors.
RockLee268 1 week ago
@TheTerrorUforgot It's true there are cult-like or similair jokes. Nowadays, people want to make easy money. For example a person learned about 2 years (style) from (teacher). He then took off and create an own system and pretend he has learn secrets from his teacher no one ever has learned. The system changed a lot from the original one. Effectiveness and efficiency has decreased for an amount of level.
RockLee268 1 week ago
@RockLee268 Effectiveness of a style can be determined from a few critea, in my opinion. From those it is really up to personal preference, body type, and scenario. I'm of the opinion styles without contact striking and some form of sparring are immediately in a lower tier. Schools of Wing Chun, Aikido, taekwondo, karate, or others than just hit air or do compliant drills are NOT in Muay Thai, BJJ, Western Boxing, or Judo's league based on that principle alone.
This is my opinion.
TheTerrorUforgot 1 week ago
@TheTerrorUforgot You can't that about all styles of Karate because some focus on hard conditioning and full-contact sparring just like Muay Thai. A perfect example of this would be Kyokushin. There's also a relatively unknown Karate style called Daido Juku - which seriously is on par with any stand-up and grappling style around.
FoneArc 1 week ago
@FoneArc Yeah Kyoukushin and some others are very solid. I never said all karate was bad.
TheTerrorUforgot 1 week ago
@RockLee268
Do you know theres also different boxing styles?
And some styles ARE better in certain aspects of a fight.
"Styles make fights."
FACT.
SkemeKOS 1 day ago
妳詠春你比較強
我比較弱拿手槍就好....
seraphsis 2 weeks ago
好悶...........................
iammichaelkui 3 weeks ago
The fight wasnt even fair the boxer had a major advantage with way more experience.
kblay211 3 weeks ago
where is the wing chun?
holyevil 3 weeks ago
Sigh, you're not going to get to be really fast and attack the eyes throat or disable shit if you cant stay conscious long enough. To the boxer that won the fight by such a long way, I'm glad you taught the guy a lesson in striking. I find the best place for Kung Fu is the weekly rental section of blockbuster
Golledgem 3 weeks ago
The guy is not using Wing Chun and I don't notice a single WC move. To fight a boxer you need to be really fast and attack his throat, eyes and disable one of his arms or legs. All martial arts have their own advantage and disadvantage , it's all depend on that person how much he knows and practice . So stop saying Kung Fu is useless !
Charlesx5328xi 3 weeks ago
我終於~看到 所有夢想都開花
我只聽的到這首歌
a74526102 3 weeks ago 2
你们俩在开玩笑吧。。。
怎么打呀。。。
koisumaz2000 3 weeks ago
詠春系貼身短打 講求近距離快速擊倒敵人 戴拳套根本快唔起 寸勁更加發揮唔到 最慘系條詠春佬根本埋唔到身 防守又錯漏百出
ray1227band 3 weeks ago
中國功夫若是沒有大量的實戰擂台練習，可能永遠沒有辦法在擂台上發光。也沒有辦法發現自己的功夫在擂台上的不足。太多的武館形式大於實戰，著重打型而忘了他們武術最大的特色和攻擊方法..弟子不知道要如何進攻、如何防守..相對的泰拳、MMA、空手、拳擊、柔術卻相當的重視..表現在實戰上的差異也的確很大
x989net 4 weeks ago
What happened to centre line theory?
rogue9915 4 weeks ago
look at the size of them
megahardcock 4 weeks ago
if wing chun was good enough...Bruce Lee wouldnt have swithced to Jeet Kuen Do
diulesing7 4 weeks ago
@diulesing7 i dont agree to wat ur saying because bruce lee didnt switch to jeet kuen do he just wanted to learn another type of kung fu and i think all types of martial art is equally in power it only depends on the person using it
vactor2222 4 weeks ago
Once again, all these so called masters had been proven to be useless and fucked. I do believe there are legit kung fu practioners but come on, wtf is all this, poor guy couldnt throw a fucking punch properly.
fuckingkimura 1 month ago
that wc guy is a joke.......
davidlau83 1 month ago
上來發表的哪個不是專家中的專家，哪有誰比誰懂的？沒人規定不懂的不准發表吧？
詠春這玩意ㄦ風行一百年了，怎會認為是看過葉問才知道詠春？
詠春師父不是只會詠春，這話有何根據？
不過詠春帶手套未必吃虧倒是真的，雙方手套都拿掉只怕永春倒的更快。
morreis5678 1 month ago
@morreis5678
雙方手套都拿掉只怕永春倒的更快<<<<<有見地有見地
不是說什麼自慰話,旦詠春的日常對打練習的確是有待加強..........
24331282 4 weeks ago
你懂詠春嗎?
你懂武術嗎?
倘若不是"葉問"，你會知道詠春嗎?
不要看個電影就以為自己很了，
電影是電影，導演當然會把主角神話一點，
詠春師父也不是只會詠春
況且，戴手套也是為人為己，降低傷害
p40103x123 1 month ago 11
He's not even doing WC correctly, his stances should always be backweighted and they are not.
Collinmrandomnumbers 1 month ago
我看不出哪里像咏春？？？
mky111193 1 month ago
真的很無言.. 詠春拳 怎麼可以戴手套打..
很多動作都是 拳擊規則不能使用的 ..
如果單論打架的話 我還是覺得詠春拳的實用性較高~
畢敬可以快速擊倒對手! 但前提是不能吃到對方的拳頭.. 拳擊手一拳打到頭不是開玩笑的...
topgtomib 1 month ago
well done wining the fight in a respecful manner regardless of his trashtalking!
lain777 1 month ago
如其在这里死硬嘴硬的说永春真的有料到不如由你自己去证实。
这么多个影评都证明永春在实战上发挥不够良好。就篇你们班小朋友看了叶文电影后当永春当神拜。要知道电影是电影，现实是现实。若是永春真的那么有料早就被美国军队拿去练了笨7
Adomiso 1 month ago 3
中國武術根本不適合戴全套打，這樣就會變成拳擊
tony32158 1 month ago
his wingchun is rather pathetic
TunezCottage 1 month ago
perhaps circle the opponent anti~clockwise,instead of jumping into their right hook?
MrSlashpig 1 month ago
@MrSlashpig thank you, at least someone gave some constructive advice
fefist 1 month ago
It does show to other people, what is good and useful to train and what is not. Stand firmly, look straight to your opponent, set up game plan to hit him back, when he strike, is a free and model fighting. Muay Thai or Bokator invent to do such.
Fidelchan1 1 month ago
建議直接跳到2:12秒看結局
jj811208 1 month ago
Wing chun Sucks!!!!
southpaw12341 1 month ago
lol the guy got tired or something, he wasn' even in guard when he got knocked out. all in all, nice video
ninjadann 1 month ago
@ninjadann
It does show to other people, what is good and useful to train and what is not. Stand firmly, look straight to your opponent, set up game plan to hit him back, when he strike. A free style fighting was invent by the Khmer king to come against the Mongolian Kublai Khan force, and it is still useful today, sanda, and footbox as well as kick boxing are from this style know as Muay Thai or bokator
Fidelchan1 1 month ago
咏春和拳击比试，咏春的完全只用拳头？拳击的选手还戴MMA的拳套？一个字～～～“型”！！！
westblue87 1 month ago
條友一野打佢仆街
jimmy2d28 1 month ago
第一，这是认真的还是在玩的？
第二，这是同一重量级的吗？
yeryetr 2 months ago
@yeryetr
1)認真,詳情請在香港討論區找答案
2)是不同重量 ,詠春師傅較重磅
24331282 2 months ago
為什麼各種功夫在真打的時候都是一個樣?? 很多視頻不看標題的話根本不懂他們用什麼功夫, 什麼師傅宗師打起架來都和普通人沒什麼兩樣 ~
bluecat68 2 months ago
dang jet li knocked the fuck out the other jet li
DaGoldC 2 months ago
這位"師傅"
你學過子午步箭馬嗎??
你對拳擊時忘記用前鋒樁了嗎??
你知道正身樁的缺陷嗎??
你還記得沖拳是可以護身的嗎?
假如以上你都知道
那我還是稱呼你"師傅"吧
z00090008 2 months ago
@z00090008 噢 真正的師傅來了
wia729 1 month ago
根本就無發揮過中國所有拳術的基本功,入馬進馬...
zuezue 2 months ago
心理是重要原因.
jayzx5597 2 months ago
The small guy was couragous. You are just showing off.
sunwado 2 months ago
so stupid he never learned to use his legs?
ForwardIntent 2 months ago
you call that wing chun? are you serious? you suck ass...i can "chi sao" you blind folded
shaolinwarrior87 2 months ago
THATS NOT WC, THATS JUMP SKIPPITY SKIP. LOL
HuRyu1 2 months ago
Comment removed
a9012456789 2 months ago
很多練武術的都太小看拳擊了
cscs987651 2 months ago
說明, 詠春只有在面對其他功夫和日本人 的時候才能發揮出來,,像這樣的拳擊手是見識不到的....
VY4tc 2 months ago
Not wingchun what is this cat like shit
dasteufelhund 2 months ago
tough to fight an opponent that obviously has nearly twice the reach, not to mention, younger as well.
wonphi 2 months ago
挖賽!!
永春???
師傅????????
挖賽!!葉問都從墳墓裏爬出來說
這不是永春了
7083024 2 months ago 3
Comment removed
a9012456789 2 months ago
Boxer was clever tired him out before knockout, wc man no stamina and too much energy wasting..
KahonaStarHai 2 months ago
咏春拳就是个笑话，看看人家拳击手为什么防守时双手下垂？那是看不起那个所谓的咏春250，在拳台上这样做就是在告诉对方：“你就是个废物，我把脸露出来给你打，你来打呀！打得到吗？”哈哈哈！最后只用了一个中等力量的迎击，就一拳撂倒。呵呵！就是个黑色的垃圾！
wuyun2004 2 months ago 2
the short man can't fight at all, shame of Ving Chun, knock him down!
2010LSK 2 months ago
完全違反詠春的要旨
s22697780 2 months ago
請問你騙三歲小孩??
哪的詠春?? 你發春??
17893great 3 months ago 2
Nice music
lawchihei 3 months ago
I don't think that guy is a master...
danielspaggiari 3 months ago
如果跟拳擊規例只可對腰以上進行攻擊, 咁詠春都冇咩勝算咯~
kailun 3 months ago
Boxer dude is quick never mind the range. WC guy leaped too much and didn't break boxer dudes timing. Needed to go to the body more then he would have had a decent chance. Too concerned with hitting him in the face, tisk tisk.
ironchun 3 months ago
黑衣男子 明知自身 矮人一截 卻 硬要攻頭...
看來黑衣男 在實戰經驗 可能是個外行
mrrock77 3 months ago
@mrrock77
不也算吧 ,詳請看03年的片段 黑衣男子天台決戰 網名"中國功夫小兒科"視頻
24331282 2 months ago
The boxer's reach is at least 12 inches greater than the WC guy.
FoneArc 3 months ago
mismatched long arms against an ant
enzo5022 3 months ago
條友隻手咁拿長-,-
hinng821 3 months ago
like duh..
g0vner 3 months ago
哈哈哈.....除了甄子丹之外，沒看過詠春打架有一次贏的！
morreis5678 3 months ago 31
@morreis5678 那叶文叻？哈哈哈
Jcff342d7eay 1 month ago
@morreis5678
你很能打是吧?!
kyopkpk 1 month ago
@kyopkpk
在說話還是在放屁？不然你要怎樣？我證明給你看怎麼樣？
morreis5678 1 month ago
@morreis5678
....哎 我不是來吵架的
只是我覺得你的那一句有問題...
還有...這位師傅根本就沒有好好發揮詠春
你不能就這樣而說詠春沒打贏過!!
kyopkpk 1 month ago
@kyopkpk
詠春這種拳適合短打，如果把雙方限制在小範圍或出其不意攻擊，是有相當速度跟威力的，但它禁不住長距離衝擊，遇到擅長用腿的或拳擊這種大幅移動的，它就不行了，這是他先天招數上的缺陷，尚待改良。
morreis5678 1 month ago
@morreis5678 那是因為你見識少
MrStatuskiller 1 month ago
@MrStatuskiller
你也不知道我是誰，我也不知道你是誰，你要扮葉準第五代孫子我也無法驗證，大家打嘴砲打發時間而已，哪天我看到詠春打贏K1或鐵絲網，我一定上這個板面跟詠春拳道歉，在這之前，對不起算我見識少，真的沒看它打贏過。
morreis5678 1 month ago 8
@morreis5678 睇1:52啦你 真係要打就ko左啦
achunchun2007 1 week ago
@morreis5678 沒錯，不敢說詠春沒用，可是這兩隻瞎貓不管到哪都會被Ｋ爆。
finallewis 1 hour ago
@morreis5678 1)其實詠春係for街頭架,D人唔識就戴拳套,所以有好多招都用唔到
2)個C傅D手法錯曬,馬步又錯曬,輸就一定啦...你冇見過詠春贏係因為正宗果D唔會上雷台....係D人睇完甄子丹就覺得詠春勁,連正宗唔正宗都分唔清
9675Tony 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@9675Tony
詠春這種拳適合短打，如果把雙方限制在小範圍或出其不意攻擊，是有相當速度跟威力的，但它禁不住長距離衝擊，遇到擅長用腿的或拳擊這種大幅移動的，它就不行了，這是他先天招數上的缺陷，尚待改良。
morreis5678 1 month ago
@morreis5678
詠春拳just a joke~!
Should call 貓春拳~!
(0_0) HAHAHAHA~! Hehehe~!
alien0513 1 month ago
@morreis5678
哈哈哈.....除了甄子丹之外，沒看過詠春打架有一次贏的!
"with the exception of donnie yen, I have never seen anyone who practices wing chun win"
I wanted to translate this comment for english speakers because it was so funny... and true. Wing Chun fighters constantly focus on fighting and boast about fighting...but when they fight it is hard to ever find anyone who doesn't just get embarrassed. I am sure there are good fighters out there, probably the ones who aren't going around starting fights?
stupidkid915 1 month ago
@stupidkid915
thanks a lot.
拳擊是一種化繁為簡有效率的攻擊方法，詠春強調保持中線，但無法掌控攻擊範圍，光樁站的穩沒有用，人家不是要掃你的腿，而是要用靈活的移動方式去攻擊你的頭，但我仍相信在狹小空間裡詠春是很厲害的，只是比鬥場地無法由你任選。
morreis5678 1 month ago
is that wc master Master Bates?
centretotheleft 3 months ago
did he really learn boxing? putting hands down all the time? 我没见过学拳击的人防守时不把双拳举至头部的.
343298918 3 months ago
@343298918 單手防禦本來就有
一方面也是對手不夠強
flossnk 3 months ago
The background music is watch?v=Txs7hJRjKDU&feature=related
I was listening to it more than watching the fight.
thresholden 3 months ago
wingchun was never designed to bob around....you will never keep up with fitter guys that way
zedsj 3 months ago
唔明點解會打女人。
keigorjai01 3 months ago
it's just simple no sticking hands means no feel and worst of all keep dropping the guard. that's the most stupidest things to do...........
blksquashextreme 3 months ago
2:12
1NX9 3 months ago
以己之短，攻彼之长，失败是正常的。
我觉得对方身高臂长，攻击下盘，还有些胜算。
oooshri 3 months ago
小弟學一點詠春,雖然我希望詠春會贏,但事實就不是這樣,詠春的招都再練被動攻擊,,想主動攻擊,拳就要活,學詠春的人大多沒其他武術底子.只會局限固有的招式.不拳夠活,當然被打.
我練好詠春中線原理後,也是會用勾拳的!詠春人不要以為日字衝拳是最快的,只有弱雞才會站著不動被日字衝拳打,只有最強的拳,沒有最強的武術.
kevincilin11 3 months ago
要找同样重量级的人对打。
jinqiangzhang 3 months ago
@jinqiangzhang 其實佢地磅數差唔多
62080332 3 months ago
自亂陣腳，沒看過詠春追人打的。
dinkozy760817 3 months ago
lucky puch~
toks2002hk 4 months ago
廢柴 明知人地身高 高過你 就拉近番個距離la 好幾次拉近左 自己又跳番後
咁都叫詠春
landscape2224 4 months ago
the thing is the taller one is more trained..... look at his body.... and the shorter one is sloppy....
volikoto 4 months ago
同埋余鐵良先生...好似真係聽過佢個名
某幾個論壇武術版都有佢名出現
好似係香港都好紅下...
samlam111 4 months ago
samlam111 4 months ago
西拳手d刺拳好準下,就咁0:37都睇得出,
唔講係唔係詠春, 係西拳人同e個高度ge中遠距素拳手,
上前都已經難, 要硬食一咋刺拳先埋到身
aHin12345 4 months ago
That's a master?
lisyaron 4 months ago
光是專業程度就差了，徐鐵良都打擂台，這個師傅可能打過一次都沒有，
加上這個拳手是受訓練的，至於這個師傅不知道有沒有打過，還是只是整天黐手?
拳手有受過抗打訓練，而且拳的磅數一定重、光身高就差一節，這師傅太天真了。
(話說背景音樂好像是隱形的翅膀?)
adsl2912117 4 months ago
在身体上都不是一个量级的，比较什么。西洋拳选手体格占优势。
TheHustgg 4 months ago
說好的詠春呢@ @"?
ShengPing83 4 months ago
There are plenty of sifu, lol. The problem is these guys have no fundamental understanding of basic covering their chin while stepping in... stupidly enough they get clocked on their way in. This is what WINGCHUN MASTERY is, not realising that you should not be sticking your chin in the air against a tall fighter when punching. All I see is WC guy throwing punches and having no escape plan nor defense after he misses... very bad.
smellokitty 4 months ago
He shouldn't call himself a sifu, well to b honest most of the so call wing chun sifu they do not know the princples of wing chun. there are no such perfect kung fu out there it all depends on how good the person are!!
flyfly422 4 months ago
@poonhokong 我反而有興趣睇下
不準用拳,
余鐵良師父去同巴柔師父玩兩手!
PS3DLS 4 months ago
@PS3DLS 不如人地唔好郁同你玩兩手好唔好?
poonhokong 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@poonhokong
唉, 所謂運動人就係咁
不準用對自己強項有益既東西,就....
講咩野,最後都會演奏成多多藉口...
做多D 運動算O拉...
PS3DLS 4 months ago
@PS3DLS 你真是無聊透頂
你怎麼不說巴柔師傅不准用關節技,跟拳師玩兩手-.-
paraken100 4 months ago
体格差が有るね
でもチャンピオンってもナショナルとかアジア圏・・・
pochi908 4 months ago
Ahahahahhaha this is a stupid WINGCHUN chun man! This is not a master!!!! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Ceskello0o0o 4 months ago
A REAL FIGHTER, will NEVER EVER try to fight your enemies FIRST! That's WingChun's Rule, forget? 武德的意义还没多少人搞懂... 在道德上的同时，你先出手，法律不会帮你，而且你先出手的情况下，容易丧失重心。
Seizlet 4 months ago
詠春拳其實是以守為攻的拳法,在西洋拳,泰拳,散打的各方賽制下,是完全難以發揮,因為詠春以短打為主,以對方之主動,化為己之主動,更何況鎊數唔同,高度相差太遠,如果相距近一點就不一樣了.
taktak807 4 months ago
@taktak807 似乎係不準用腳,
余鐵良師父無做過任何下盤方式的防守!
PS3DLS 4 months ago
@taktak807
重吹，輸就輸，已經帶露指拳套，紅衫都冇用腳，簡單D講，有冇一個詠春打到MMA
中國功夫最Q 勁，而家KO R，你明唔明!
高度相差太遠：詠春唔係講打手，再打身～
搏擊要立體，我明個你打中線，你以為重打到，比個細路你打好唔好!
reneejay 4 months ago
什么马步也没有，出拳都不定位。
Wongyiktze 4 months ago
This also is not wing chun,come on,got any wing chun real fight?Where is the leg stance?Where is the tang sao,the 1st rule of wing chun,1 attack 1 defence,where is that?Only attack?that is not wing chun,don't make wing chun look like a idiot pls.
eviltidus89 4 months ago
為什麼要叫我進來聽張韶涵
18230m 4 months ago
佢真係詠春?步唔係中間出,太好進,
起腳個人都搖
zas3131 4 months ago
我還以為玩詠春的都比較謙虛，比試時都處於防守居多，看來也是有像少數像他這種好勝型的，雖然最終還是輸了。
a9012456789 4 months ago
我係門外漢，不過看了，那位Master 真是~~~~
zantaclee 4 months ago
Thats not Wing Chun. Thats call kangaroo boxing. all these people claiming to be using wing chun making the real wing chun look bad....
catnip302 4 months ago
Excellent stuff.... thank you for sharing
ShadowWarrior8038 4 months ago
做緊咩.......
y3070911 4 months ago
wicked hook btw
mvpo86 4 months ago
i thought wing tsun was a defensive style of kung fu.. It was the boxer who was being more defensive that the sifu
mvpo86 4 months ago
@mvpo86 he's not being defensive. He's just not wasting energy throwing punches that cannot do damage. in fact he's always pressuring the wc guy to corners. He's the more relaxed fighter of the two.
500ncb 4 months ago
其實...
阿所謂拳王由頭到尾都沒有做任何對腳攻擊的防守
加上見到詠春師傅出完腳都停手
令人好奇怪
是阿所謂拳王根本只懂防守拳?
是阿所謂拳王是對腳的攻擊完全不明白??(拳擊先天缺憾)
一開始定了規則不用腳???
如果真的是以上三樣
阿所謂拳王你就算9數了吧!
PS.如果有第4 樣不妨講解一下...
PS3DLS 4 months ago
@PS3DLS
拳王跟他上網討論, 黑衣人不服拳王論點 ,要約戰證實他的理論可行
拳王大方答應 ,防守拳只是拳王不斷造就機會讓師傳實踐他的理論, 要他輸得沒藉口......
如果一開始是全力攻勢的話......這段片應該只有10秒吧.....
24331282 2 months ago 3
垃圾...
philipslam01 4 months ago
@philipslam01
指阿所謂拳王?
PS3DLS 4 months ago
@PS3DLS both of them :P
philipslam01 3 months ago
so farcical
oneofbattlesaru 4 months ago
That's Why i Dont Like Authentic Wingchun, i like Non authentic Wingchun whichis Has modified and Added Some Other Arts. i Like Thechinaboxer Method. be Realize. that some Tradisional Arts is Hard to addapted
cursegrindattack 4 months ago
boxing is way more practical in real fights. it has a straight forward method of defense and offense. It's very powerful in standard fighting rules. One punch is enough to take opponent out when it lands. many of the Chinese Martial Arts are not for practical fighting. They focus on forms and for shows, or self-exercise. MMA is the most powerful style, like Bruce Lee, the founder of MMA.
babu111ca 4 months ago
@babu111ca
CMA are not for practiccal fighting?! The styles are still around today are proven in combat, otherwise they would have disappeared as noone would have learnt them. You have to learn forms but then extract the techniques and use them as necessary, not posture 1 into posture 2 etc. That's the classical mess BL talked about. Most martial arts teach forms etc then go straight into kickboxing, bouncing up and down stuff. They never learn to fight their style.
rogue9915 4 weeks ago
@rogue9915 BL didn't invent MMA. Most styles have an origin story something like, "Master So and So of style X was unbeatable until he tried to beat up a 300 year old man, who put him on his arse. After 2 years of begging, he was accepted as a student and combined the two styles to form a new style that was all the rage". He just reminded people that no one style has it all and you need to train your weak areas more than your strengths. MMA fighters are superb athletes.
rogue9915 4 weeks ago
he looks so tired or under drugs xD
bauerm12 4 months ago