@haz020190 is connected with the first stage of animals, such as snails and shellfish which have only the power of touch. The word 'connection' with regard to these created things means that the last stage of each group is fully prepared to become the first stage of the newest group.The animal world then widens, its species become numerous, and, in a gradual process of creation, it finally leads to man, who is able to think and reflect.
@haz020190 Read what darper said and attributed the theory to. To darwin or to Mohammedan?
Read this from Famous Book of IBN- Khaldun Al Muqaddimah
One should then take a look at the world of creation. It started out from the minerals and progressed, in an ingenious, gradual manner, to plants and animals. The last stage of minerals is connected with the first stage of plants, such as herbs and seedless plants. The last stage of plants, such as palms and vines, (CONT...)
@FatRakoon The danger is when the evolutionists totally ignore and deny the facts that are put before them because of love of self indulgence, that is driving this hate for the truth is what is driving this world down where base instincts and self-centered behavior rule, and faith, mercy, compassion and love are seen as weakness. The belief of no accountability will be the reason their souls will end in Hell.
The deceptions of the evil one are running rampant and the end of all things is near!!!
The piltdown man set the study of evolution back 50 years as scientist ignored other evidance. Nebrasca man was published without peer review in the media. Lucy WAS found with her knee which proves she was bipedal and many other specimans have been found. Hundreds of fossils of nendathals and homo erectus have been found. All evidance supports evolution or else evolution wouldn't be a scientific theory. If someone disproved evolution with irrefutable evidance they would win a noble prize. Every
"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever! In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact."
@fishermanpete OMG someone from the atomic energy commision. wow id better listen to what he has to say on the subject of evolution.
Also that was in no way a response to kwan185s comment. He pretty much explained a the 'fraud' section of ur video, i dont take ur quote reply as a denial of what he said.
@haz020190 How about this fella then. He knows the TRUTH too.
"It is easy enough to make up stories of how one form gave rise to another, and to find reasons why the stages should be favored by natural selection. But such stories are not part of science, for there is no way of putting them to the test."
Personal letter from Dr Collin Patterson, Senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London, to Luther D. Sunderland
"I, myself, am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially to the extent to which it's been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the credulity that it has."
Malcom Muggeridge, Pascal Lectures, Ontario Canada, University of Waterloo.
"Modern apes, for instance, seem to have sprung out of nowhere. They have no yesterday, no fossil record. And the true origin of modern humans - of upright, naked, tool-making, big-brained beings - is, if we are to be honest with ourselves, an equally mysterious matter."
''We're not just evolving slowly,'' Gould says, ''for all practical purposes we're not evolving. There's no reason to think we're going to get bigger brains or smaller toes or whatever - we are what we are.''
Stephen Jay Gould ( Professor of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University )
"...not being a paleontologist, I don't want to pour too much scorn on paleontologists, but if you were to spend your life picking up bones and finding little fragments of head and little fragments of jaw, there's a very strong desire to exaggerate the importance of those fragments..."
Dr. Greg Kirby (Senior Lecturer in Population Biology at Flinders University ) in an address given at a meeting of the Biology Teachers Association of South Australia.
To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.
The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils.
Stephen Jay Gould, Former Professor of Geology and Paleontology at Harvard University
"Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species."
Dr. Etheridge, senior paleontologist of the British Museum of Natural History, cited in Dr. Scott Huse, The Collapse of Evolution.
"The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein".' Sir Fred Hoyle (English astronomer, Professor of Astronomy at Cambridge University)
' I know the question in the minds of many of you who have followed me to this point: "Does not science prove that there is no Creator?" Emphatically, science does not prove that!'
Paul A Moody, Ph.D. (zoology) (Emeritus Professor of Natural History and Zoology, University of Vermont)
Evolution is pure bullshit, requiring a lot of faith. To use a quote from above. "When I want to know about engineering, I ask an engineer." You will also need to involve a team of designers, software programmers, mathematicians, Engineering is a multi team discipline. Evolution relies on unscientific endorsements!
@TheLogic1010 "Evolution is pure bullshit, requiring a lot of faith".
State your case. Keep it reasonable in length. I will not accept quote mining, intentional shortening of quotes, anything from Answers in Genesis, The Discovery Institute, Institute of Creation Science, using the big bang to show how evolution is false.
Tell me your understanding of evolution. I'm not going to expect much.
@metalsusa1 The word evolution has been stolen, so we must change the word back to Neo Darwinism. I don't do religion in my assessment of Neo Darwinism, it's purely scientific. The mechamism of change is called evolution. Evolution as used in The Theory of Evolution is bullshit and inadequately describes how change in species occured over time. The language you use in your comment is quite emotional as expected from evolutionists so I don't see we will get much sense from yourself.
@metalsusa1 I went blind about 8 or 10 when I gave ear to the false teachings of Evolution in the public schooling system. Then my morals deteriorated which is it's by-product, I started to ignore my conscience because that couldn't exist, as with evolution, we are just animals and I was living according to it's nature. But all along was HELLBOUND
But now Praise the Lord: Amazing Grace, how sweet the sound, that saved a wretch like me. I once was lost, but now am found was blind but now I see.
Usual Creo own goal at 0:41 by including the bones of Lucy who nobody is claiming as human. The significance of Lucy is that it walked upright & this is borne out by anthropologists (real scientists) analysing the socket shape where the talus fits into the tibia & comparing with extant bipeds & non bipeds. Also if one femur is present & the other missing, it is more than fair to assume the missing one to be the mirror of the other. I don't know why creationists have to be so dishonest.
"The evidence given... makes it overwhelmingly likely that Lucy was no more than a variety of pygmy chimpanzee, and walked the same way (awkwardly upright on occasions, but mostly quadrupedal).
The 'evidence' for the alleged transformation from ape to man is extremely unconvincing."
SOURCE: Albert W. Mehlert,
Former Evolutionist & paleoanthropology researcher. "Lucy - Evolution's Solitary Claim for Ape/Man." CRS Quarterly, Volume 22, No. 3, p. 145
man the lengths people will go to to show there lack of knowledge and understanding. good example of natural selection, moronic civilization equals moronic population....
@darkfireroughton2 One thing I have noticed with evolution believers. They always attack those cannot believe their lies. This is because they have Zero evidence to use to back up their brainwashed belief. This happens almost without fail.
@fishermanpete Evolution followers always attack critics of evolution theory without reason. They label everyone who speaks out against evolution theory as a creationist or ID follower. The facts are evolution theory cannot be proved or disproved. I think there is a link between man and primates. How this transformation happened is inadequately explained by using only evolution theory. There are other complex factors involved. Modern science will hopefully find this answer and not belief.
@TheLogic1010 If I may, science DOES NOT PROVE ANYTHING. In the scientific method that you lectured me on explains why this so. That's why falsification of ones own theory is so important. We can never learn everything there is to learn about anything, so science tries to falsify claims to show the probability of those claims to be verifiable and correct.
B.T.W. The theory of evolution has never, in 150 years of scientists trying, been falsified. Genetics shows the link with man and primate.
@metalsusa1 The scientific method has been shown to be a no show by Sir Peter Medawar. I don't discount a link between man and primates. The theory of evolution is an inadequate theory of how this transformation happened and this faith system is based on belief than actual science.
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE ( In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil) ~ Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology).
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their vital structures, organs, and reproductive system hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works doesn't mean there's no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell then the apparatus exists to direct the formation of more cells, but how did that first cell originate? Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not arrange or produce. If a variation survives then that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION COULDN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
@Gryffster I'm sorry mate, it's hard when you find out that your whole belief structure is a lie and that deep down it's your perversions that wants to believe that man is king. But somebody has to wipe away the delusions.
@johnty1 Wow, thank you mate, I've never been called astounding before! And seeing how I'm making a mockery of the evolutionary evidence right in front of your eyes that the frauds came up with, I think it's up to you brainwashed people who have believed the lie to prove me incorrect. Because that's what the video is about, the lies and the joke of what you believe. But like all atheists, they have to believe the lies, so they don't have to believe in God and admit that they are damned sinners.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
The LORD looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God. They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one.
Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread, and call not upon the LORD.
@paspax I'm not ignorant mate, I know the truth. I can see that by evolutions zero evidence, and plus the fact of all the lies put forward to try and brainwash this poison into the unthinking and unquestioning multitudes, that it is the joke of the millenium. It takes much more faith to believe evolution than what I believe. So with my faith as a mustard seed your mountain is coming down and will be trampled underfoot.
@fishermanpete "It takes much more faith to believe evolution than what I believe." I love this quote. I hear it from nearly every creatard. It's so obviously meant to provoke, especially when it's used in the context of someone's statements as you used it: "I'm dumb, I like it, I can't accept science, and science is just a religion anyway!". But hey, keep on thinking the mountain is coming down. Not likely, but if it does, fine. Maybe the truth IS better, but it's probably not creationism.
@alphaenemy I understand mate, it is so much easier to attack me than the facts in the video. I also understand the hurt when we live in darkness and somebody turns the light on and our little created universe in our own mind is blown away by facts that cannot be denied or hidden from. So will the next step for you be, to come to Christ as your Rock and Reedeemer or will you just evolve some more and say "the aliens did it" like many will. When we refuse the truth, all there is left is lies.
@DanteDouglas It was 40% of Lucy, not 40 skeletons. If they had these then they would display them far and wide and we would never hear the end of it. But they can't because they don't exist. Did you know that Lucy is short for Luciferian and these are they that are pushing this belief and hiding everything that promotes Creation. You are caught up in it whether you like it or not. Renew your mind, look for the truth if you dare. A pre flood world existed and is easy to see. Start with Baalbek.
"The more statistically improbable a thing is, the less can we believe that it just happened by blind chance. Superficially the obvious alternative to chance is an intelligent Designer."
- Dr. Richard Dawkins (Department of Zoology, Oxford University, UK)
"Evolution is unproved and improvable, we believe it because the only alternative is special creation, which is unthinkable."
(Sir Arthur Keith, a militant anti-Christian physical anthropologist)
@fishermanpete "SUPERFICIALLY the obvious alternative to chance is an intelligent designer."
I actually read the book. He added the word "superficially" just to keep people from trying to do what you just did. Right after saying that, he goes on to explain why ID doesn't add up when you look at it closely. I would recommend reading books before quoting them.
It must be painful to face the truth head on and wonder why you have believed a lie for so long.
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Rom 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
@fishermanpete He gave you rational explanations and you gave him bible bullshit? YOU'RE AN EMBARASSMENT. Oh and that video of yours really shows how uneducated you are. Quite sad really.
The quote is in Richard Dawkins book. I never put it there, he did. He knows evolution is garbage but he hates God. It's not rational to believe fairy tales because of this.
And when people curse the Bible, a book they have never read and have no understanding about, but love to tell how wrong it is, all I feel is pity.
Act 2:38 Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Yeah, yeah, I know, you God haters always come up with the same stuff to try to put Him down so I'm not going to talk about obediance being better than sacrifice, or the nephilim/giants or the recieving of demons through sin or the importance of making an oath to the Creator, because you evolutionists are about as spiritual as chainsaws and as blind as a bats. But at least you are honest and admit to the existance of Jesus Christ, who is my creator and yours. So turn to Him for Life
@guyver2095 You obviously want to believe anything but the facts. Sin is real also, you can't run from your guilt and shame. Repent and be free from your perversions.
You should change your name into LobotomisedFish.
Helge129 2 weeks ago
@Helge129 This is reality friend, not another video game.
fishermanpete 2 weeks ago
@haz020190 is connected with the first stage of animals, such as snails and shellfish which have only the power of touch. The word 'connection' with regard to these created things means that the last stage of each group is fully prepared to become the first stage of the newest group.The animal world then widens, its species become numerous, and, in a gradual process of creation, it finally leads to man, who is able to think and reflect.
flexpape 1 month ago
@haz020190 Read what darper said and attributed the theory to. To darwin or to Mohammedan?
Read this from Famous Book of IBN- Khaldun Al Muqaddimah
One should then take a look at the world of creation. It started out from the minerals and progressed, in an ingenious, gradual manner, to plants and animals. The last stage of minerals is connected with the first stage of plants, such as herbs and seedless plants. The last stage of plants, such as palms and vines, (CONT...)
flexpape 1 month ago
I often wonder what people who wont accept the absolutely overwhelming mountain of evidence for Evolution actually think about?
What can they possibly have going on in their heads that makes them actually deny it!
Is their religionreally that messed up that they simply wont accept the facts right in front of them?
Its beyond unfunny, its downright dangerous.
FatRakoon 1 month ago
@FatRakoon The danger is when the evolutionists totally ignore and deny the facts that are put before them because of love of self indulgence, that is driving this hate for the truth is what is driving this world down where base instincts and self-centered behavior rule, and faith, mercy, compassion and love are seen as weakness. The belief of no accountability will be the reason their souls will end in Hell.
The deceptions of the evil one are running rampant and the end of all things is near!!!
fishermanpete 1 month ago
The piltdown man set the study of evolution back 50 years as scientist ignored other evidance. Nebrasca man was published without peer review in the media. Lucy WAS found with her knee which proves she was bipedal and many other specimans have been found. Hundreds of fossils of nendathals and homo erectus have been found. All evidance supports evolution or else evolution wouldn't be a scientific theory. If someone disproved evolution with irrefutable evidance they would win a noble prize. Every
kwan185 2 months ago
@kwan185
"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever! In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact."
(Dr. Newton Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission.)
fishermanpete 2 months ago
@fishermanpete OMG someone from the atomic energy commision. wow id better listen to what he has to say on the subject of evolution.
Also that was in no way a response to kwan185s comment. He pretty much explained a the 'fraud' section of ur video, i dont take ur quote reply as a denial of what he said.
haz020190 1 month ago
@haz020190 How about this fella then. He knows the TRUTH too.
"It is easy enough to make up stories of how one form gave rise to another, and to find reasons why the stages should be favored by natural selection. But such stories are not part of science, for there is no way of putting them to the test."
Personal letter from Dr Collin Patterson, Senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London, to Luther D. Sunderland
fishermanpete 1 month ago
@haz020190
"I, myself, am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially to the extent to which it's been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the credulity that it has."
Malcom Muggeridge, Pascal Lectures, Ontario Canada, University of Waterloo.
fishermanpete 1 month ago
@haz020190
"Modern apes, for instance, seem to have sprung out of nowhere. They have no yesterday, no fossil record. And the true origin of modern humans - of upright, naked, tool-making, big-brained beings - is, if we are to be honest with ourselves, an equally mysterious matter."
Dr. Lyall Watson, Anthropologist
fishermanpete 1 month ago
@haz020190
''We're not just evolving slowly,'' Gould says, ''for all practical purposes we're not evolving. There's no reason to think we're going to get bigger brains or smaller toes or whatever - we are what we are.''
Stephen Jay Gould ( Professor of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University )
fishermanpete 1 month ago
@haz020190
"...not being a paleontologist, I don't want to pour too much scorn on paleontologists, but if you were to spend your life picking up bones and finding little fragments of head and little fragments of jaw, there's a very strong desire to exaggerate the importance of those fragments..."
Dr. Greg Kirby (Senior Lecturer in Population Biology at Flinders University ) in an address given at a meeting of the Biology Teachers Association of South Australia.
fishermanpete 1 month ago
@haz020190
To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.
Charles Darwin in The Origin of Species
fishermanpete 1 month ago
@haz020190
The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils.
Stephen Jay Gould, Former Professor of Geology and Paleontology at Harvard University
fishermanpete 1 month ago
@haz020190
"Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species."
Dr. Etheridge, senior paleontologist of the British Museum of Natural History, cited in Dr. Scott Huse, The Collapse of Evolution.
fishermanpete 1 month ago
@haz020190
"The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein".' Sir Fred Hoyle (English astronomer, Professor of Astronomy at Cambridge University)
fishermanpete 1 month ago
@haz020190
' I know the question in the minds of many of you who have followed me to this point: "Does not science prove that there is no Creator?" Emphatically, science does not prove that!'
Paul A Moody, Ph.D. (zoology) (Emeritus Professor of Natural History and Zoology, University of Vermont)
fishermanpete 1 month ago
Evolution is pure bullshit, requiring a lot of faith. To use a quote from above. "When I want to know about engineering, I ask an engineer." You will also need to involve a team of designers, software programmers, mathematicians, Engineering is a multi team discipline. Evolution relies on unscientific endorsements!
TheLogic1010 3 months ago
@TheLogic1010 "Evolution is pure bullshit, requiring a lot of faith".
State your case. Keep it reasonable in length. I will not accept quote mining, intentional shortening of quotes, anything from Answers in Genesis, The Discovery Institute, Institute of Creation Science, using the big bang to show how evolution is false.
Tell me your understanding of evolution. I'm not going to expect much.
metalsusa1 2 months ago
@metalsusa1 The word evolution has been stolen, so we must change the word back to Neo Darwinism. I don't do religion in my assessment of Neo Darwinism, it's purely scientific. The mechamism of change is called evolution. Evolution as used in The Theory of Evolution is bullshit and inadequately describes how change in species occured over time. The language you use in your comment is quite emotional as expected from evolutionists so I don't see we will get much sense from yourself.
TheLogic1010 2 months ago
@TheLogic1010 Ha Ha! I'm not not emotional I'm just sickened by the ignorance and lack of basic understanding of evolution by schmucks like you.
metalsusa1 2 months ago
@metalsusa1
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
fishermanpete 2 months ago
@fishermanpete How old were you when you went blind?
metalsusa1 2 months ago
@metalsusa1 I went blind about 8 or 10 when I gave ear to the false teachings of Evolution in the public schooling system. Then my morals deteriorated which is it's by-product, I started to ignore my conscience because that couldn't exist, as with evolution, we are just animals and I was living according to it's nature. But all along was HELLBOUND
But now Praise the Lord: Amazing Grace, how sweet the sound, that saved a wretch like me. I once was lost, but now am found was blind but now I see.
fishermanpete 2 months ago
@metalsusa1 I rest my case. Your ignorant of life and an obvious emotional faith evolution follower.
TheLogic1010 2 months ago
@TheLogic1010 Thank you for the kind words.
metalsusa1 2 months ago
Usual Creo own goal at 0:41 by including the bones of Lucy who nobody is claiming as human. The significance of Lucy is that it walked upright & this is borne out by anthropologists (real scientists) analysing the socket shape where the talus fits into the tibia & comparing with extant bipeds & non bipeds. Also if one femur is present & the other missing, it is more than fair to assume the missing one to be the mirror of the other. I don't know why creationists have to be so dishonest.
pilgrimpater 3 months ago
@pilgrimpater
"The evidence given... makes it overwhelmingly likely that Lucy was no more than a variety of pygmy chimpanzee, and walked the same way (awkwardly upright on occasions, but mostly quadrupedal).
The 'evidence' for the alleged transformation from ape to man is extremely unconvincing."
SOURCE: Albert W. Mehlert,
Former Evolutionist & paleoanthropology researcher. "Lucy - Evolution's Solitary Claim for Ape/Man." CRS Quarterly, Volume 22, No. 3, p. 145
fishermanpete 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fishermanpete "CRS Quarterly, Volume 22, No. 3, p. 145"
HAHA
ur quoting from the Creation Research Society?? like its a real un-biased scientific journal?? seriously
this is the worst quote ever.
haz020190 1 month ago
man the lengths people will go to to show there lack of knowledge and understanding. good example of natural selection, moronic civilization equals moronic population....
darkfireroughton2 4 months ago
@darkfireroughton2 One thing I have noticed with evolution believers. They always attack those cannot believe their lies. This is because they have Zero evidence to use to back up their brainwashed belief. This happens almost without fail.
fishermanpete 4 months ago
@fishermanpete Evolution followers always attack critics of evolution theory without reason. They label everyone who speaks out against evolution theory as a creationist or ID follower. The facts are evolution theory cannot be proved or disproved. I think there is a link between man and primates. How this transformation happened is inadequately explained by using only evolution theory. There are other complex factors involved. Modern science will hopefully find this answer and not belief.
TheLogic1010 2 months ago
@TheLogic1010 If I may, science DOES NOT PROVE ANYTHING. In the scientific method that you lectured me on explains why this so. That's why falsification of ones own theory is so important. We can never learn everything there is to learn about anything, so science tries to falsify claims to show the probability of those claims to be verifiable and correct.
B.T.W. The theory of evolution has never, in 150 years of scientists trying, been falsified. Genetics shows the link with man and primate.
metalsusa1 2 months ago
@metalsusa1 The scientific method has been shown to be a no show by Sir Peter Medawar. I don't discount a link between man and primates. The theory of evolution is an inadequate theory of how this transformation happened and this faith system is based on belief than actual science.
TheLogic1010 2 months ago
Are we being fed a lie that chickens and geese and turkeys are related?
odinata 4 months ago
@odinata If you believe that evolution is true then they can be your relations if you like. LOL
fishermanpete 4 months ago
Look it up in wikipedia. Look up evolution there and see how the biologists know it is a fact:)
winterstellar 5 months ago
@winterstellar
The video is of proven facts, i don't have to look anything up.
It hurts doesn't it, to know you have believed a lie from a bunch of liars. So seek the pure truth. And you won't get that from Wikipedia, it's junk.
fishermanpete 5 months ago
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE ( In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil) ~ Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology).
Mogley52 5 months ago
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 5 months ago
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their vital structures, organs, and reproductive system hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 5 months ago
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 5 months ago
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works doesn't mean there's no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell then the apparatus exists to direct the formation of more cells, but how did that first cell originate? Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 5 months ago
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not arrange or produce. If a variation survives then that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 5 months ago
GENETIC INFORMATION COULDN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
Mogley52 5 months ago
Stick to playing the banjo on the porch.
Gryffster 5 months ago
@Gryffster I'm sorry mate, it's hard when you find out that your whole belief structure is a lie and that deep down it's your perversions that wants to believe that man is king. But somebody has to wipe away the delusions.
fishermanpete 5 months ago
Post the evidence for these "facts" in your video.
Jakbob1236 7 months ago
@Jakbob1236
Luk 16:30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.
Luk 16:31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
fishermanpete 7 months ago
@fishermanpete
Jakbob asked for evidence. Quotes from a book, even if they had any relevance, are not evidence.
"The lengths some people go to to prove an impossible theory is astounding" So true, the most astounding thing is you are describing yourself.
(and it should be "...are astounding" )
johnty1 5 months ago
@johnty1 Wow, thank you mate, I've never been called astounding before! And seeing how I'm making a mockery of the evolutionary evidence right in front of your eyes that the frauds came up with, I think it's up to you brainwashed people who have believed the lie to prove me incorrect. Because that's what the video is about, the lies and the joke of what you believe. But like all atheists, they have to believe the lies, so they don't have to believe in God and admit that they are damned sinners.
fishermanpete 5 months ago
The religious are still trying to hold science back.
ExperienceTheJesus 7 months ago
@ExperienceTheJesus
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
The LORD looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God. They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one.
Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread, and call not upon the LORD.
fishermanpete 7 months ago
@fishermanpete
Proverbs 27:17
Iron sharpens iron; so a man sharpens the countenance of his friend.
keep up the good work bro :)
davidmas0 7 months ago
@ExperienceTheJesus
The theory of evolution is not science it is science fiction.
davidmas0 7 months ago
Evolution is fact.
Ignorance doesn't change that.
paspax 8 months ago 9
@paspax I'm not ignorant mate, I know the truth. I can see that by evolutions zero evidence, and plus the fact of all the lies put forward to try and brainwash this poison into the unthinking and unquestioning multitudes, that it is the joke of the millenium. It takes much more faith to believe evolution than what I believe. So with my faith as a mustard seed your mountain is coming down and will be trampled underfoot.
fishermanpete 8 months ago
@fishermanpete where did you get the picture at 1:43 dear friend, i would like to use this
DavidTheCatholic 7 months ago
@fishermanpete "It takes much more faith to believe evolution than what I believe." I love this quote. I hear it from nearly every creatard. It's so obviously meant to provoke, especially when it's used in the context of someone's statements as you used it: "I'm dumb, I like it, I can't accept science, and science is just a religion anyway!". But hey, keep on thinking the mountain is coming down. Not likely, but if it does, fine. Maybe the truth IS better, but it's probably not creationism.
alphaenemy 6 months ago
@alphaenemy I understand mate, it is so much easier to attack me than the facts in the video. I also understand the hurt when we live in darkness and somebody turns the light on and our little created universe in our own mind is blown away by facts that cannot be denied or hidden from. So will the next step for you be, to come to Christ as your Rock and Reedeemer or will you just evolve some more and say "the aliens did it" like many will. When we refuse the truth, all there is left is lies.
fishermanpete 6 months ago
@paspax The only ignorance is that evolution theory is a fact, only a belief that it happened that way.
TheLogic1010 2 months ago
People here got Poe'd.
Hjernespreng 8 months ago
@DanteDouglas It was 40% of Lucy, not 40 skeletons. If they had these then they would display them far and wide and we would never hear the end of it. But they can't because they don't exist. Did you know that Lucy is short for Luciferian and these are they that are pushing this belief and hiding everything that promotes Creation. You are caught up in it whether you like it or not. Renew your mind, look for the truth if you dare. A pre flood world existed and is easy to see. Start with Baalbek.
fishermanpete 9 months ago
@DanteDouglas Please can you tell me what facts in the video is misinformation. Here's your big chance.
fishermanpete 9 months ago
This is exactly why you shouldn't get information about biology from people who are completely uneducated about it.
When I want to know about engineering, I ask an engineer.
When I need surgery done, I consult a surgeon.
When I need to find out how to fly to mars, I consult an astrophysicist.
When I have questions about biology, I ask a biologist, not an anti-biology nutcase whose only explanation is goddidit.
witchtelus 10 months ago 6
@witchtelus
"The more statistically improbable a thing is, the less can we believe that it just happened by blind chance. Superficially the obvious alternative to chance is an intelligent Designer."
- Dr. Richard Dawkins (Department of Zoology, Oxford University, UK)
"Evolution is unproved and improvable, we believe it because the only alternative is special creation, which is unthinkable."
(Sir Arthur Keith, a militant anti-Christian physical anthropologist)
fishermanpete 10 months ago
@fishermanpete "SUPERFICIALLY the obvious alternative to chance is an intelligent designer."
I actually read the book. He added the word "superficially" just to keep people from trying to do what you just did. Right after saying that, he goes on to explain why ID doesn't add up when you look at it closely. I would recommend reading books before quoting them.
10percentAtheist 10 months ago
@10percentAtheist
It must be painful to face the truth head on and wonder why you have believed a lie for so long.
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Rom 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
fishermanpete 10 months ago
@fishermanpete He gave you rational explanations and you gave him bible bullshit? YOU'RE AN EMBARASSMENT. Oh and that video of yours really shows how uneducated you are. Quite sad really.
Reasonwillwin 10 months ago
@Reasonwillwin
The quote is in Richard Dawkins book. I never put it there, he did. He knows evolution is garbage but he hates God. It's not rational to believe fairy tales because of this.
And when people curse the Bible, a book they have never read and have no understanding about, but love to tell how wrong it is, all I feel is pity.
Act 2:38 Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
fishermanpete 10 months ago
@fishermanpete I don't think you've read the bible, you should go back and actually read it properly
1 chronicles 21
deuteronomy 3
exodus 21
judges 11
What a great god to be advocating such acts.
121dan121 9 months ago
@121dan121
Yeah, yeah, I know, you God haters always come up with the same stuff to try to put Him down so I'm not going to talk about obediance being better than sacrifice, or the nephilim/giants or the recieving of demons through sin or the importance of making an oath to the Creator, because you evolutionists are about as spiritual as chainsaws and as blind as a bats. But at least you are honest and admit to the existance of Jesus Christ, who is my creator and yours. So turn to Him for Life
fishermanpete 9 months ago
@witchtelus The guy ho did this video is sooo sick, that he believes that we are going to believe this.
guyver2095 4 months ago
@guyver2095 You obviously want to believe anything but the facts. Sin is real also, you can't run from your guilt and shame. Repent and be free from your perversions.
fishermanpete 4 months ago