Added: 4 years ago
From: StaxX28
Views: 77,686
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (255)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is a classic

  • Graphics straight from Genesis. Should've took them from the arcade game at least.

  • the lynx was actually ok, not grteat but not all bad either.

  • im not a fan of this cameras point of view, if you had a console that looks like shit,why would you make the sprites so huge? you would think they would scale the focus back a little bit to draw attention away from how ugly the sprites look so close

  • The NES version is still the best

  • @JuicyPlayer

    WRONG,the Sega Master System's version was superior to NES's butchered port

  • @dogmanx88 The NES version wasn't really a port, it was an interpretation. Whether the SMS version was closer to the arcade or not (it was) doesn't matter, most everyone grew up with NES Double Dragon.

  • @dogmanx88 The arcade and Master System version are boring and they end too quickly , at least the NES version had platforming to mix things up. NES version also had better music.

  • 這人物會不會過大啊!

  • The graphics for Lynx's DD are excellent, but it loses a little too much gameplay and is too much of a mindless button masher. Check out the Ninja Gaiden port (not Ninja Gaiden III) to Lynx to see a similar game from the same era better implemented.

  • I ALWAYS LOVED THE DOUBLE DRAGON INTRO, THE CHICK GETS PUNCHED IN THE BREAD BASKET!" LOL

  • Probably should have hopped in that car from the garage you strolled out of and ran their asses down, maybe then the main boss wouldn't have escaped all the way to Level Four.

  • Man, what was the resolution of the Lynx, 64 pixels by 48 pixels?

  • Imagine now that in a 16bit console they didn't make it look like at all like the arcades ant they could do it look more cool.And here we have atari lybx to make the best port.

  • snd is important ~ thanxs atari

  • FAR superior to the NES and SMS home ports. and it was portable!

  • Comment removed

  • 1993 was way to late to to port this. Street fighter And mortal combat had the attention. I did enjoy the lynx in 91

  • One thing I like about this game is that the characters on the lynx version are large. Most other DD games the characters are small and blocky. :D

  • love the classic panty shot at the begining

  • most awfully straightforward plot i've ever seen

  • @TaintedFaith88 Who cares... That was kickass game. :D

  • it's like if they kept/use the original arcade sprite ^^

    maybe it's why the characters loks so biiiiiiiiiiig !!! :D

  • i did not know that double dragon was on that system

  • where are the eol boss characters?

  • Atari Lynx was a good console, i had the Sega Game Gear and the fat kid over the road had the better Lynx!

    The Lynx died out due to lack of support/games that the cheaper Sega GG had, so the Lynx had potential, like the PC Engine GT.

    Sadly the inferior Sega GG and Gameboy Colour dominated the market.

  • Panty power

  • These bad guy's are a perfect example of people who never learn.

  • First faithful rendition of the actual arcade gameplay comes from a handheld.

    Lynx was a fun machine.

  • That first bad guy looks like Ray Liotta

  • The graphics are awesome in the Atari Lynx version, I mean look at those huge & detailed sprites! Excellent for only 16 colours!

  • Comment removed

  • The music is fantastic in this. sad when a hand held can do better music then a console. Namely the genesis version, that very well made me wanna vomit!

  • Тётю то зачем по мордам! Такая красивая была =))) хахахаха =)))

  • 6:20 Love the background detailing!

  • damn look at these grapics looks so good

  • this makes me want to get a lynx. i already have a bunch of systems including game boy,game boy pocket,game boy advance sp,psp,game gear, and i used to have game boy color and virtual boy but can't find them. also one of my old friends destroyed my game boy advance original.

  • soooo retro

  • Fantastic version!Almost coin op perfect! Lynx lost the handheld battle because of inferior marketing......

  • @Misel982001

    I did not even know about this handheld before i got Intenet. :(

    The Lynx was huge, but it was way more advanced than the Gameboy and the Game Gear.

  • @HipHop1981 true but if Atari guys were smart they could win the battle. Lynx sold approx 2m units.When Lynx had passed the 500.000 sold units they could introduce a cut down version in the size of Game Gear.Atari made historical errors in marketing, errors equivalent of those of IBM in the early 80's. Just imagine that all PC's could be IBM brand only....

  • @Misel982001 And price. When it first came out it was twice the cost of a Gameboy. It only became cheaper when the Lynx 2 came out and it was on it's last legs.

  • @ojideagu I just dont get it...They are smart enough to create such a machine and dumb enough to ruin it...Happy new year!

  • the title screen on the linx is very poor.......

  • No Roper and you don't throw the knife either and stage two is weird.

  • sweet its got the pantie shot

  • Comment removed

  • @mrmiyagi5 Pervert!

  • Wow a dude punched a woman in the stomach, the game must have been created by charlie sheen LMAO

  • Yay, Marion's panties. :p

  • 2:10 ... meow... :$

  • @ugforthewin fuck that ass!!!

  • How the original Gameboy managed to survive with the Lynx on the market is a mystery.

  • @gamewizard not really a mystery, the game boy had better games and 3rd party support and the lynx had mostly doo doo, and any lynx owner will tell u (i own one)about the systems atrocious battery life (or lack thereof) and its piss-poor screen..... 

  • @buhshmuh Nintendo had better 3rd party support because they did everything short of stiff-arming the game companies and stores to do their bidding. For example- it was under contract that a licensee could not make the same game for a competing console until two years had passed. Also, Nintendo would tell stores "You sell only OUR products, or you don't sell ANY of our products." With policies like these, the others- Turbografx 16, Atari, etc. didn't stand much of a chance in the market.

  • @linelazur I am glad to see you know your videogame industry history, I do as well and agree with you wholeheartedly! I really dont agree with those policies now as I hate what the industry has become in general, (EA, FPS's with no innovation, on disc DLC, yearly sequels, etc.) but the fact is the NES was the place to be to play games, and being a kid I was glad my NES had the best games. Say what you will about Nintendo, but they set a goal of controlling the market and accomplished it.

  • @buhshmuh That's funny- you mention Lameboy and the Lynx in the same sentence, and call the Lynx's screen piss poor...

  • @Amberr8069 yeah the lynx screen is terrible, yes its in color, but its just as bad as the original game boy's screen.... the game boy color screen was superior in every way, why did u get offended at my comment? do you own a lynx and prefer it? thats fine, i own both an atari lynx and a few game boys and lots of other consoles, we may not agree on which handheld we prefer, but no need to get butthurt, its not that serious =)

  • the graphics looked VERY close to the actual arcade game, but the low frame rate and worse sound is what killed it. It's a shame Atari didn't market the Lynx better and make it more affordable. Who knows what might have happened if thnigs turned out different and Nintendo lost the handheld wars!

  • @TargetRender It is the emulator: the actual game goes pretty smooth on the Atari Link

  • i remember playing this bwck in the day in the arcade. smoke a joint behind the building then whoop my friends ass in this and street fighter2.

  • FFHJJIYWJLLVZZX

    ;/22222MKNGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG­GGGG

  • @:27

    did she fart?

  • the music is what made this game good

  • This Double Dragon is much better than the one i had on the Amiga, the Amiga was a lot more powerful but its Double Dragon was much much worse, damn the Amiga developers failed hard.

  • I've always loved big sprites but holy fuck!

  • What a crap resolution

  • Lol @ 3:42 he killed his own guy.

  • I have the game still unopened. I bought it so I could play it on my brother's Lynx & he hasn't let me borrow it to play it for a while. Maybe I should buy my own Lynx.

    By the way, how do you record it from Handy? Do you use a screen capture software? I tried that once with a game & either the sound or video came out messed up.

    The most arcade-faithful versions of Double Dragon & Ninja Gaiden were on the Lynx. I have both games. Viking Child is also a great game (not an arcade game port).

  • @wtcvidman Ninja Gaiden was def the best port. Not sure about Double Dragon, most of the ports were bad. This one is ok. I had a lynx 2 at school. You might as well get one on ebay although check the condition of the screen pixels etc

  • @ojideagu

    My brother lets me use his every now & then. But I would like to have my own since I bought Lynx games (Double Dragon, Ninja Gaiden, Hydra, Switchblade II, Ms. Pac-Man, Gauntlet, etc) years ago that I want to open & play and haven't been able to do. He has many games for it too (Kung Food, Batman Returns, Desert Strike, Elvira's Pinball Jam, Dirty Larry, Viking Child, Slime World, European Soccer Challenge, Basketbrawl, Hockey, Crystal Mines, Warbirds, Rygar, Paperboy, etc).

  • @wtcvidman Yeh get TOKI too that is excellent. Does he have the Lynx 1 or 2, the 1 is monstrous, 2 is big but managable at home. It was sometimes hard to get games even when I was at school as shops were beginning not to stock it anymore, that was around 1992!!!

  • @ojideagu

    When he first got it, he had the Lynx 1 model. I think it was either broken or broke very quickly. He returned it & got the 2nd model afterwards, which looks & is designed much better. I have to try Toki. I also want Ninja Gaiden III & some of those many puzzle games they made. Dracula The Undead is one that both of us wanted but never got. I have to search for that one. I got some of the newer games too like Bubble Trouble & Fat Bobby. I'd like to get Krazy Ace too.

  • Woohoo time to kick some pixelated ass!! Reminds me of playing arcade games in a dark sticky floored bowling alley where all the games had burn marks from people leaving their smokes on em while they played. Man we live in a sterile environment today!

  • Gotta love a game that starts with a panty shot.

  • i think that the lynx is 8 bit right

    is it?

    well looks good to be 8 bit

  • @vasquez123100

    Some call it 16-bit, some 8-bit. The CPU was effectively 8-bit, but the graphics processor was 16-bit. It was pretty advanced for its time. I think calling it a 16-bit hand held is not wrong.

  • @vasquez123100

    No Lynx & Turbo Express were both 16-bit while Game Boy & Game Gear were 8-bit. I loved all those consoles, but the Turbo Express was prone to break pretty easily.

  • @wtcvidman Turbo express is a 8 bit with 16 bit video processor.

  • @rafmerton

    By 8-bit, you mean the sound right? Because the main (video) processor for the graphics is 16-bit (like the TG16) like you said.

  • @wtcvidman i mean that is a 8 bit. The main processor (cpu) is a HuC6280A (8 bit), the graphic part is handle by 2 gpu who are a HuC6260 and a HuC6270A (both 16 bit). The sound used the cpu (HuC6280A 8bit). So it's like having a nintendo NES with a Genesis/Megadrive chipset for graphic, it's still a 8 bit system.

  • @rafmerton

    I think that would mean that the graphics (since they're handled by 16 bit processors) are 16-bit while being processed by an 8-bit processor, right? Like a supercharged NES that has its limits (like you put it).

  • @wtcvidman Something like that ^^

  • @rafmerton

    Actually the Genesis/Mega Drive graphics chip-set was quite inferior to the PC-Engine / TurboGrafX-16 GPUs and quite weak for 16-bit standards as it could only display 64 colours on-screen (61 if you consider that the last 4 were used as a transparent colour register so they were the same), where as the PCE & SNEs could display 256colours on-screen.

  • Shut up woman.

    *POW*

    Now back to the cave.

  • This game does look pretty good, though it does have it's fair share of flaws, with the crappy sound, and the fact that you can't see much of the playing field either. Despite this, this version of Double Dragon was still the best one to play on handheld systems, until Double Dragon Advance came out, which is the best Double Dragon game ever, in my opinion.

  • good graphics for an old entertainments system!

    Better than NES,GB,and Sega SMS.

    Excepted 8-Bit sounds,this is one (with genesis megadrive) of most fidelious reproductive versions!

  • This system shoud've done good Atari fucked it up.

  • You people must be lookiing at this with rose coloured glasses. There is no fucking way this is "Just like the arcade". From the choppy as fuck animation, god awful sound effects and the fact it's super-zoomed in to hide the lack of background details that made it Double Dragon. Sure the Master System version had those whacky dwarf sprites, but at least it had better control / collision detection and tried hard to replicate each level's signature traps.

  • @aeonlinear - The lynx version isn't exactly the same as the arcade. But it's based right on it. The character designs are derived right from the arcade. They move in the same frames of animation as the arcade.

  • has anyone beaten this version?

  • how slow is the level timer :\ it's like 5 seconds to every 1 second lol

  • This feels like the MK vs DC feature called Close Kombat where you can't see anything but the fighters.

  • Talk about a faithful recreation! Looks superb!

  • @dholmlund Yup. And no more worries about the crappy battery life anymore. Take that, GAMEBOY!!!!!

  • I really like the graphics on this version but the sound is horrible

  • thats stupid...

  • i like the sprites of this game,

  • I thought this game kinda sucked when I first got it because it was nothing like the Sega Master game I grew up with. It was hard to control.

    Then I played the arcade version later, and it was JUST like the LYNX version!!! Lynx was really true to the arcade! So..... it's really the arcade game that sucks. Not the lynx.

  • @dogeymon83 Nope - it's the Master System version that suxxors!

  • @ meyerphillip - I can't comprehend why anyone has a problem with the sega master version. I had no problem controlling that game and I was 6 when I was playing it. Roughly the same age when I finally beat it.

  • Ok I didnt really play the MS version much, but it seemed ok. Although I think the sounds were a little muffled, but other than that I remember it being good. Forgive me?

  • @meyerphillip the best home version was the mega drive 1

  • @dogeymon83 your'e out of your mind

  • @dogeymon83 You've got balls to insult the pinnacle of fighting games.

    It makes me want to scratch my face off with a bed of nails.

  • Was your controller stuck??

  • this game looks silly...lol

  • is this an emulator ? And if so .. which one ?

  • Yes, it's an emulator !

    Handy 0.95

  • @StaxX28 im gong to play it on my wiihady prt to test this portof the emulator

  • Holy fuck , its like they hit the zoom button on that game! They should of compensated for the small screen size.

  • I love how the music sounds in this game. I don't know why...

  • @Nintendavin Its a shame this is from an emulator because Handy dosn't quite get the sound right, the music on this sounds far better on the real hardware!

  • ... This console was a 16 BIT HANDHELD in an era where Handhelds were still in the 8 bit era.

    If anything, this console IS NOT a ghetto system.

    [it does have it's fair share of flaws though]

  • would of been better 8-bits, the processor was 8-bit and not much stronger than the game gear.

    the address was 16-bits and even the snes had a 8-bit address bus

  • What good is the memory when the hardware doesn't take full advantage of it?

  • @PopcornCoolie big talk for a man whose sole favorite is a fart video

  • What's your point? How does that make what I had stated any less of a fact? I never marked it as a favorite. I don't mark favorites so I have no idea why it's marked.

  • The sprite style makes me think they took the Genesis version and zoomed the view, then removed some of the enemy sprites (to replace them with recolored versions of Williams) for the Lynx version. I prefer the "arcade style" graphics to the more cartoony style of the NES adaptations, but still. yeah, a bit disappointing.

  • hahah i love how he one-times the girl and carries her away with a gratuitous panty shot

  • i agree th3planetsghost :)

  • derp .. I meant Guardians - Storm Over Doria.

  • When you hold it in your hand it feels amazing ... the huge characters works somehow.

    I only got to play this once. At the CES show in Chicago in 1992. Same year as SFII for SNES. Yet I only remember playing this for like an hour straight.

    They also had Guardian Heros there .. which I believe was never finished. and a bad version of Off-Road.

  • Those are some MASSIVE sprites. I guess the developers were trying to make their version look different from the other ports, so hey you can't fault them for that. On the other hand, you can't see the play area well, so it ends up working out poorly.

    Either way it beats the shit out of the way-too-ambitious Atari 2600 version. Now that's a game that shouldn't have been attempted...

    also, lol at 3:34, looks quite wrong :)

  • They tried to make the sprites EXACTLY the same as the ones from the arcade game, and since the resolution of the arcade game was like 4x bigger, that probably wasn't a good idea.

  • Actually, the sprites are from the Genesis version, oddly enough.

    In fact, this game is a lot like the Genesis version. Then again, it was the same developers.

  • damn, marian looks like a tranny in this game.

  • I wish I didn't lose my Atari Lynx, I loved this game!

  • The music for level 3 on regular NES was waaay better. This version sounds too generic

  • i am so nervous becouse i dont have this handheld system. :(

  • I was always impressed with the Lynx....It was impressive in ways I cant explain...

  • This version has better audio than the Sega Genesis version.

  • My god. Could this be any more "in your face"? It's like being 2 inches from the screen. Kinda over the top.

  • they shud make this for the ds or psp

  • I had this.Holly giant characters Batman

  • They sure ruined the 2nd level, took the fun out of it. And where is the guy in the pink shirt? HA!

  • Anyone else think Billy looks like Billy Idol?

  • Makes me feel old.

  • bloody good looking game for its time

  • Oh I know right? Every non-Nintendo Double Dragon was awful. Arcade and Xbox Live versions (they're the same) are exempt from this.

  • Xbox Live version is like cheating cuz they used the same code from the arcade, it's practically an emulator.

    What personally amazes me of this telegame version is the awfull sound for a 1993 game -in both music and SFX.

    BTW missions 2 and 3 BGMs are NES version's rip off.

  • @ the music and sfx, that's because it was made for a handheld console released in 1989, so that's expected. still better than the gameboy though

  • Yeah dude, after making a little research I learned about my mistake. I just spoke too fast.

    But you can't deny the BGMs are NES rip offs, right?

  • Well it is the DD theme, and even a DD ripoff wouldn't be worth calling DD without it's themesong :)

  • No dude, maybe I didn't make me clear. I meant that everything sounds pretty much like in the NES version: timing, the "bass", the arranges, and some other stuff -except by a few little changes here and there.

    Missions 2 and 3 are the best examples.

  • Not true--the Sega Master System version of Double Dragon was *THE BEST* of the 8-bit era. VERY faithful to the coin op. It was great!

  • Sega Master System? That version was awful.

  • The NES Version sucked man what r u talking about? The SMS Version was better.

  • Are you kidding me? The SMS version had tons of flicker, sluggish controls, horrible graphics and lackluster audio. The only plus I can think of is that it featured the two-player mode, but it's so flickery it's barely playable. It's a real dud. It's leagues better than the Atari 7800 version, but for pure fun, no port beats the NES version. Although I have to say now that we have Xbox Live Arcade, there's no point in getting the home ports anymore cause the original arcade version is on Live.

  • I'd like to have some of the Crack you smoking...NES Version was one Player, and you had to Earn your Moves what fun is that?

  • I never minded earning the moves, but I agree the one player limitation was a real drawback. My point is that in 1988, the NES version was the only port that had good, responsive controls. Double Dragon II was the high point for the series IMO.

  • I agree with that one as in that one despite all the Extra Non sensical Levels where you had to make Long Jumps, and the Music for the Stages, and Bosses were Mixed up...I liked it, and I still own all 3 on the NES.

  • So you have to face wave after wave of young James Caan clones, a hooker who probably donated the eggs for their creation and has a whip, and the big black guy who just learn about the emancipation proclimation. LOOOVE IT!!

  • The Arcade is the only good double dragon not that NES peice of shit. The Genesis is not a remake its an attempt to copy the arcade game but doesnt do too well.

  • Amazing how by 1993 we STILL couldn't get an arcade perfect Double Dragon..

  • bruckshot, ojideagu, they're both good. Just for different reasons.

    The NES version focuses more on the platforming aspect, the Arcade version is just pure fighting.

  • oh gawd i had this version! man, i wish i didn't lose my Lynx T_T

  • i plaid snes return of duble dragon, it was good

  • for some strange reasons this thing was strangely too powerfuly ahead of itz time

  • I can't help but laugh at the part where Marion gets punched in the stomach! *Doing!*

  • ZOOOOOOOOOM ! lol

  • the lynx was better than I remember with the exeption of the graphics.

  • too zoomed in..great for its time nonetheless

  • Don't forget the Lynx was up against the original B/W Gameboy. Damn.

  • Good memories!!!

  • Impressive LARGE sprites, I could have had some great times with this game if I had a copy when I was younger.

  • Its beter than n.e.s version

  • Very Good game. Thank you.

  • great graphics for the time, good faithfull sound. collision detection bad and the screens zoomed right in, i understand its a handeld but they didnt have to have it that close

  • What...what the hell!!!

  • graphics and game play look good but the music is fuckin awful.

  • I actually have a strange feeling the hit detection in this game is awful....I dunno why...all versions except the NES and GameBoy versions have that problem.

  • I think you're probably right for the most part anyway. I know for sure that the Genesis and Master system versions have poor hit detection, but I'm not sure about any of the computer ports of which there are many.

    You forgot to mention the GBA version as an exception also though.

  • The GBA version is the best DD ever!

  • I agree. That was a pretty cool game but my only gripe was it was a little too easy.

  • This is pretty impressive for a handheld at that time

  • I have a feeling the hit detection and controls are awful.

  • Amiga & Atari ST

    Double Dragon

    could've been

    arcade perfect

    they mess it up