I agree organic foods are a scam. And in fact they use carcinogenic pesticides that have been grandfathered in by the government. Organic farming also does more damage to the environment because of the low crop yield, more land is being used up.
Genetically engineered crops is were its at.
BTW, I found it funny you were talking about what's healthy while lighting a cigarette at the same time.
@hockeybuzz555 Yeah, smoking is my bad vice. Only one, though...meh. I tried quitting but failed. I exercise, practice my Kenpo, don't drink but once in a blue moon, eat right, etc. It's bad, I know, but I am not a heavy smoker...if that makes a difference. Not making an excuse, I know it's not good.
yeah what does producing more food have to do with it...it has no health benefits over regular foods you just pay more thats what he is talking about,
also organic vegetables taste like shit, and im serious I ate an organic banana I swear it didnt even taste like a banana, organic food is like crack cocaine of foods engineered to fool suckers into paying more for their food, thats right you organic food eaters are SUCKERS!
USDA website "With a few exceptions, studies point to environmental advantages for organic farming practices with respect to a) maintaining or building soil quality, b) lessening ground and surface water contamination, c) reducing greenhouse gas emissions, d) encouraging biodiversity, e) conserving water and energy resources, and, f) recycling waste." nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/faq/Bu yOrganicFoodsD.shtml
@myndy86 You missed the parts that also have found: "organic" food takes up more land, produces less. Also, even though it may not use conventional pesticides, it's not more healthier. But, people like you are smarter than research and scientists. After all, admitting you're wrong is hard to do.
@Bllackguard666 "Organic farming can yield up to three times as much food as conventional farming on the same amount of land.""in developed countries, yields were almost equal on organic and conventional farms. In developing countries, food production could double or triple using organic methods"" sciencedaily"dot"com/releases/2007/07/070711134523.htm
I quoted the parts that said it was healthier, like reduces risk of prion related disease etc. Learn to read.
@Bllackguard666 Organic farming can lead to increased food production – in many cases a doubling of yields has been seen""the average crop yield increase was even higher for these projects: 116 per cent increase for all African projects and 128 per cent increase for the projects in East Africa"
unctad.org/en/docs/ditcted200715_en.pdf
That's a quote from the same UN study. But, people like you are smarter than research and scientists. After all, admitting you're wrong is hard to do.
UN report "Organic farming leads to many improvements to the natural environment, including increased water retention in soils, improvements in the water table (with more drinking water in the dry season), reduced soil erosion combined with improved organic matter in soil leading to better carbon sequestration, and increased agro-biodiversity."
[Current issues regarding organic food]., Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi., Universitatea de Medicină si Farmacie "Ecological food is tastier and contains more essential amino-acids, vitamin C, and micro-nutriments than usual food" ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16610189
[Better health with ecologic food?]. Universitetet i Oslo "organic foods compared to conventionally produced foods seem to have a higher content of antioxidants in plant products and a higher content of fat-soluble vitamins and omega-3 fatty acids in animal products. Animal studies (among them, on rabbits and chickens) show higher fertility and less morbidity in animals fed organically." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15195159
[A comparison of chemical composition and nutritional value of organically and conventionally grown plant derived foods]. Orv Heti "Organic crops contain a significantly higher amount of certain antioxidants (vitamin C, polyphenols and flavonoids) and minerals, as well as have higher dry matter content than conventional ones.""there is a lower level of pesticide residues, nitrate and some heavy metal contaminations in organic crops compared to conventional ones." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17297755
From healthy soil to healthy food: an analysis of the quality of food produced under contrasting agricultural systems., Nutr Health, University of Kassel "Studies under controlled experimental conditions show a clear advantage for staple food grown under biological/ecological farming conditions as compared to those from conventional farming methods."" lower undesirable (e.g. nitrates) and higher desirable (e.g. vit. C, trace elements) components are present." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3054635
IJFSN study Organic food: nutritious food or food for thought? A review of the evidence. Weight gain was greater in organically fed rats,mortality was lower at 9 weeks,incidence of degenerative diseases was lower. Lower mortality in organically fed rabbits. 2nd and 3rd generation rabbits from organically fed parents exhibited higher birth rates and more viable embryos. Infectious illnesses were less frequent in 2nd generation organically fed animals. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12907407
IJFSN study Organic food: nutritious food or food for thought? A review of the evidence. Weight gain was greater in organically fed rats,mortality was lower at 9 weeks,incidence of degenerative diseases was lower. Lower mortality in organically fed rabbits. 2nd and 3rd generation rabbits from organically fed parents exhibited higher birth rates and more viable embryos. Infectious illnesses were less frequent in 2nd generation organically fed animals. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12907407
Myndy86: I know you are mad because us smarter and more aware people, and science has proved your "organic" to be a scam. But don't flag a statement you don't like on my page just because it bruises your tree-hugging, ego. Look at the facts and quit dancing around it. It's obvious I could sell you sand in a jar while you're at the beach, if I said it was "healthy".
@Bllackguard666 Just to let you know, I didn't flag any comments and I have never flagged a comment ever on youtube. If anyone has ego problems it's you.
@Bllackguard666 I have given you overwhelming evidence that not only is organic food generally more nutritious/healthier but that the London Hygiene study is flawed by using data from the 1950's and even you admitted it. You said "Umm...this "organic" movement didn't come into effect until 1972, so I have no idea (besides your ass) where you got those dates.", admitting the London School of Hygiene study is crap! It is your ego that prevents you from admitting you were wrong.
Dr. Mercola stated "nutritional supplements complement the food you eat. They do not take the place of a healthful diet of unprocessed organic foods, which I believe is still the best physical factor for you to achieve optimal nutrition." products.mercola"dot"com/multivitamin-vital-minerals/
You took Dr. Mercola's statement out of context, he never said organic isn't healthier. I also already gave you a dozen other peer reviewed review studies suggesting organic is more nutritious/healthier.
French government food safety agency AFSSA"1/ organic plant products contain more dry matter and minerals (Fe, Mg); and contain more anti-oxidant micronutrients such as phenols and salicylic acid, 2/ organic animal products contain more polyunsaturated fatty acids""4/ 94–100% of organic food does not contain any pesticide residues, 5/ organic vegetables contain far less nitrates, about 50% less" agronomy-journal"dot"org/index.php?option=com_article&access=doi&doi=10.1051/agro/2009019&Itemid=129
USDA website"on average organic foods contain slightly higher levels of trace minerals,vitamin c and antioxidant phytonutrients than conventionally grown crops." "Organic meat products have been shown to reduce risk for potential prion-related diseases including mad cow disease and to arsenic residues in chicken meat, and organic livestock practices do not contribute to the growing phenomenon of drug resistant pathogens." nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/faq/BuyOrganicFoodsIntro.shtml
The London School of Hygiene also did a health study, reviewing a few health studies comparing organic to conventionally grown food. Their review found that the largest and best study concluded that infants fed organic food had much less eczema than conventionally fed infants. Yet, for some unknown reason the London School of Hygiene decided not to actually do the meta-analysis, probably because they would have to admit that evidence does exist that organic has health benefits.
The huge majority of studies suggest organic is generally more nutritious and healthier than conventional food. The London School of Hygiene study reviewed 162 studies and found organic food had higher levels of several nutrients. So, they eliminated all but 55 studies and then only phosphorus was higher for organic. They also included questionable data from the 1950's, before government certified organic existed and nutrients were higher and testing was less accurate. It was very flawed.
God damn it,some people would do just about anything if the oily bastard lobbyists,as you called them,convinced them that it's "good" for them.If they could profit off of people jumping from windows of their buildings and smashing their heads on concrete they would just tell them that it'll make their penises bigger and k-ching they're making money off of dumbass' that want huger dicks.
God damn it,some people would do just about anything if the oily bastard lobbyists,as you called them,convinced them that it's "good" for them.If they could profit off of people jumping from windows of their buildings and smashing their heads on concrete they would just tell them that it'll make their penises bigger and k-ching they're making money off of dumbass' that want huger dicks.
@AnarchyDeathHate666 Haha, funny way of putting it, but it is true. Tell a gullible tree hugger that "This pizza is organic" and they will jump on it like ugly on an ape. Stupid sheeple. Their egos tell them they are different and special, rather than thinking, and knowing what a marketing scam is.
i agree with you but what about gen modified foods?
delicatelilflower88 3 weeks ago
@delicatelilflower88 GMF's don't make a claim, so therefore don't have to explain itself. Much like us Atheist.
Bllackguard666 2 weeks ago
I agree organic foods are a scam. And in fact they use carcinogenic pesticides that have been grandfathered in by the government. Organic farming also does more damage to the environment because of the low crop yield, more land is being used up.
Genetically engineered crops is were its at.
BTW, I found it funny you were talking about what's healthy while lighting a cigarette at the same time.
hockeybuzz555 1 month ago
@hockeybuzz555 Yeah, smoking is my bad vice. Only one, though...meh. I tried quitting but failed. I exercise, practice my Kenpo, don't drink but once in a blue moon, eat right, etc. It's bad, I know, but I am not a heavy smoker...if that makes a difference. Not making an excuse, I know it's not good.
Thanks for the comment : )
Bllackguard666 1 month ago
yeah what does producing more food have to do with it...it has no health benefits over regular foods you just pay more thats what he is talking about,
also organic vegetables taste like shit, and im serious I ate an organic banana I swear it didnt even taste like a banana, organic food is like crack cocaine of foods engineered to fool suckers into paying more for their food, thats right you organic food eaters are SUCKERS!
Hiide666 3 months ago
@Hiide666 Haha, thanks, that was funny how you put it on the last line, but true.
Bllackguard666 3 months ago
USDA website "With a few exceptions, studies point to environmental advantages for organic farming practices with respect to a) maintaining or building soil quality, b) lessening ground and surface water contamination, c) reducing greenhouse gas emissions, d) encouraging biodiversity, e) conserving water and energy resources, and, f) recycling waste." nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/faq/Bu yOrganicFoodsD.shtml
myndy86 5 months ago
@myndy86 You missed the parts that also have found: "organic" food takes up more land, produces less. Also, even though it may not use conventional pesticides, it's not more healthier. But, people like you are smarter than research and scientists. After all, admitting you're wrong is hard to do.
Bllackguard666 5 months ago
@Bllackguard666 "Organic farming can yield up to three times as much food as conventional farming on the same amount of land.""in developed countries, yields were almost equal on organic and conventional farms. In developing countries, food production could double or triple using organic methods"" sciencedaily"dot"com/releases/2007/07/070711134523.htm
I quoted the parts that said it was healthier, like reduces risk of prion related disease etc. Learn to read.
myndy86 5 months ago
@Bllackguard666 Organic farming can lead to increased food production – in many cases a doubling of yields has been seen""the average crop yield increase was even higher for these projects: 116 per cent increase for all African projects and 128 per cent increase for the projects in East Africa"
unctad.org/en/docs/ditcted200715_en.pdf
That's a quote from the same UN study. But, people like you are smarter than research and scientists. After all, admitting you're wrong is hard to do.
myndy86 5 months ago
UN report "Organic farming leads to many improvements to the natural environment, including increased water retention in soils, improvements in the water table (with more drinking water in the dry season), reduced soil erosion combined with improved organic matter in soil leading to better carbon sequestration, and increased agro-biodiversity."
unctad.org/en/docs/ditcted200715_en.pdf
myndy86 5 months ago
[Current issues regarding organic food]., Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi., Universitatea de Medicină si Farmacie "Ecological food is tastier and contains more essential amino-acids, vitamin C, and micro-nutriments than usual food" ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16610189
myndy86 5 months ago
[Better health with ecologic food?]. Universitetet i Oslo "organic foods compared to conventionally produced foods seem to have a higher content of antioxidants in plant products and a higher content of fat-soluble vitamins and omega-3 fatty acids in animal products. Animal studies (among them, on rabbits and chickens) show higher fertility and less morbidity in animals fed organically." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15195159
myndy86 5 months ago
[A comparison of chemical composition and nutritional value of organically and conventionally grown plant derived foods]. Orv Heti "Organic crops contain a significantly higher amount of certain antioxidants (vitamin C, polyphenols and flavonoids) and minerals, as well as have higher dry matter content than conventional ones.""there is a lower level of pesticide residues, nitrate and some heavy metal contaminations in organic crops compared to conventional ones." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17297755
myndy86 5 months ago
From healthy soil to healthy food: an analysis of the quality of food produced under contrasting agricultural systems., Nutr Health, University of Kassel "Studies under controlled experimental conditions show a clear advantage for staple food grown under biological/ecological farming conditions as compared to those from conventional farming methods."" lower undesirable (e.g. nitrates) and higher desirable (e.g. vit. C, trace elements) components are present." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3054635
myndy86 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IJFSN study Organic food: nutritious food or food for thought? A review of the evidence. Weight gain was greater in organically fed rats,mortality was lower at 9 weeks,incidence of degenerative diseases was lower. Lower mortality in organically fed rabbits. 2nd and 3rd generation rabbits from organically fed parents exhibited higher birth rates and more viable embryos. Infectious illnesses were less frequent in 2nd generation organically fed animals. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12907407
myndy86 5 months ago
IJFSN study Organic food: nutritious food or food for thought? A review of the evidence. Weight gain was greater in organically fed rats,mortality was lower at 9 weeks,incidence of degenerative diseases was lower. Lower mortality in organically fed rabbits. 2nd and 3rd generation rabbits from organically fed parents exhibited higher birth rates and more viable embryos. Infectious illnesses were less frequent in 2nd generation organically fed animals. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12907407
myndy86 5 months ago
Myndy86: I know you are mad because us smarter and more aware people, and science has proved your "organic" to be a scam. But don't flag a statement you don't like on my page just because it bruises your tree-hugging, ego. Look at the facts and quit dancing around it. It's obvious I could sell you sand in a jar while you're at the beach, if I said it was "healthy".
Bllackguard666 5 months ago
@Bllackguard666 Just to let you know, I didn't flag any comments and I have never flagged a comment ever on youtube. If anyone has ego problems it's you.
myndy86 5 months ago
@myndy86 Yes. Pointing out a scam to people and being informative is about ego. You're right. Happy?
Bllackguard666 5 months ago
@myndy86 Yes. Pointing out a scam to people and being informative is about ego. Happy?
Bllackguard666 5 months ago
@Bllackguard666 I have given you overwhelming evidence that not only is organic food generally more nutritious/healthier but that the London Hygiene study is flawed by using data from the 1950's and even you admitted it. You said "Umm...this "organic" movement didn't come into effect until 1972, so I have no idea (besides your ass) where you got those dates.", admitting the London School of Hygiene study is crap! It is your ego that prevents you from admitting you were wrong.
myndy86 5 months ago
@myndy86 Prove it's crap.
Bllackguard666 5 months ago
@myndy86 You are thick-headed, self-righteous, ignorant and annoying. /blocked.
Bllackguard666 5 months ago
Dr. Mercola stated "nutritional supplements complement the food you eat. They do not take the place of a healthful diet of unprocessed organic foods, which I believe is still the best physical factor for you to achieve optimal nutrition." products.mercola"dot"com/multivitamin-vital-minerals/
You took Dr. Mercola's statement out of context, he never said organic isn't healthier. I also already gave you a dozen other peer reviewed review studies suggesting organic is more nutritious/healthier.
myndy86 5 months ago
French government food safety agency AFSSA"1/ organic plant products contain more dry matter and minerals (Fe, Mg); and contain more anti-oxidant micronutrients such as phenols and salicylic acid, 2/ organic animal products contain more polyunsaturated fatty acids""4/ 94–100% of organic food does not contain any pesticide residues, 5/ organic vegetables contain far less nitrates, about 50% less" agronomy-journal"dot"org/index.php?option=com_article&access=doi&doi=10.1051/agro/2009019&Itemid=129
myndy86 5 months ago
USDA website"on average organic foods contain slightly higher levels of trace minerals,vitamin c and antioxidant phytonutrients than conventionally grown crops." "Organic meat products have been shown to reduce risk for potential prion-related diseases including mad cow disease and to arsenic residues in chicken meat, and organic livestock practices do not contribute to the growing phenomenon of drug resistant pathogens." nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/faq/BuyOrganicFoodsIntro.shtml
myndy86 5 months ago
The London School of Hygiene also did a health study, reviewing a few health studies comparing organic to conventionally grown food. Their review found that the largest and best study concluded that infants fed organic food had much less eczema than conventionally fed infants. Yet, for some unknown reason the London School of Hygiene decided not to actually do the meta-analysis, probably because they would have to admit that evidence does exist that organic has health benefits.
myndy86 5 months ago
The huge majority of studies suggest organic is generally more nutritious and healthier than conventional food. The London School of Hygiene study reviewed 162 studies and found organic food had higher levels of several nutrients. So, they eliminated all but 55 studies and then only phosphorus was higher for organic. They also included questionable data from the 1950's, before government certified organic existed and nutrients were higher and testing was less accurate. It was very flawed.
myndy86 5 months ago
God damn it,some people would do just about anything if the oily bastard lobbyists,as you called them,convinced them that it's "good" for them.If they could profit off of people jumping from windows of their buildings and smashing their heads on concrete they would just tell them that it'll make their penises bigger and k-ching they're making money off of dumbass' that want huger dicks.
AnarchyDeathHate666 5 months ago
God damn it,some people would do just about anything if the oily bastard lobbyists,as you called them,convinced them that it's "good" for them.If they could profit off of people jumping from windows of their buildings and smashing their heads on concrete they would just tell them that it'll make their penises bigger and k-ching they're making money off of dumbass' that want huger dicks.
AnarchyDeathHate666 5 months ago
@AnarchyDeathHate666 Haha, funny way of putting it, but it is true. Tell a gullible tree hugger that "This pizza is organic" and they will jump on it like ugly on an ape. Stupid sheeple. Their egos tell them they are different and special, rather than thinking, and knowing what a marketing scam is.
Bllackguard666 5 months ago
@Bllackguard666 Haha,exactly!
AnarchyDeathHate666 5 months ago