am i mistaken or could he have just taken the derivative of the parametrized equations, then just put dy/d(theta) over dx/d(theta) and used 2Pi as theta, instead of using the taylor expansion
am i mistaken or could he have just taken the derivative of the parametrized equations, then just put dy/d(theta) over dx/d(theta) and used 2Pi as theta
If a point is the intersection of two lines, and a line is the intersection of two planes, then is a plane the intersection of two 3-dimensional spaces? That doesn't make any sense, but it almost seems like it would be true if you kept following the initial logic.
To all those saying that this is the best math instruction ever. I like this guy and find his explanations good and useful, but have had at least 4 professors that were better. I am very grateful for these videos, but don't think this is as good as it gets. this is just what competent math instruction looks like, not excellent math instruction. I hope you guys get to experience first hand really good instruction.
I am amazed at the number of people that freaked out at the Taylor expansion and seemed to hate them. I thought they were one of the most elegant and powerful things I has seen in mathematics and they answered so many questions.
Funny thing is, you can find taylor expansions for the functions you want to integrate, then integrate then taylor expansion and with the new expansion, go back to an elementary function. Which is a lot less effort than trig-substitutions.
Can anyone clarify why (at 48:01) he sets sin(θ) ≈ θ θ^3/6, leaving out the second degree term (θ^2/2) as it seems should have been next according to the Taylor expansion? He doesnt do that when setting cos(θ) ≈ 1 θ^2/2. I keep thinking about it but cant figure out what Im missing.
On 12:19 an Motorola batery is empty
osmannee 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
deadpeng 1 month ago
so bin selber aus Frankfurt
TaiLanorazx659 1 month ago
This one is very relevant. It helps a lot.
agapitoflores001 2 months ago
why was everyone clapping
TheJuga 4 months ago
Love this guy. I did get a bit lost on the Taylor stuff but I need to review it and was here mainly for the parametric representation part.
LAnonHubbard 4 months ago
taylor series are awesome everyone flipped shit HAHAHA!! Stupid MIT kid
sundeshP 7 months ago
"have mercy" hahahahaha
jakeyboyGH 10 months ago
who are the 3 ignorant folks?
bmx391xmb 1 year ago
You could tell it was a Friday.
adidasguy87 1 year ago 3
am i mistaken or could he have just taken the derivative of the parametrized equations, then just put dy/d(theta) over dx/d(theta) and used 2Pi as theta, instead of using the taylor expansion
lsufan1234 1 year ago
am i mistaken or could he have just taken the derivative of the parametrized equations, then just put dy/d(theta) over dx/d(theta) and used 2Pi as theta
lsufan1234 1 year ago
Comment removed
aandreya 1 year ago
If a point is the intersection of two lines, and a line is the intersection of two planes, then is a plane the intersection of two 3-dimensional spaces? That doesn't make any sense, but it almost seems like it would be true if you kept following the initial logic.
zanariot 1 year ago
In 4-dimensional space, that's right.
Two n-dimensional objects intersecting in n+1-dimensional space make a n-1 dimensional intersection.
poseidon129266 1 year ago
he came up with a really round about way of saying take the derivative dx/dy.
MikeM8891 1 year ago
To all those saying that this is the best math instruction ever. I like this guy and find his explanations good and useful, but have had at least 4 professors that were better. I am very grateful for these videos, but don't think this is as good as it gets. this is just what competent math instruction looks like, not excellent math instruction. I hope you guys get to experience first hand really good instruction.
michalchik 1 year ago
I am amazed at the number of people that freaked out at the Taylor expansion and seemed to hate them. I thought they were one of the most elegant and powerful things I has seen in mathematics and they answered so many questions.
Now trig substitutions, those are ugly.
michalchik 1 year ago 19
Funny thing is, you can find taylor expansions for the functions you want to integrate, then integrate then taylor expansion and with the new expansion, go back to an elementary function. Which is a lot less effort than trig-substitutions.
Deliratio 1 year ago
@Deliratio Good point, I had forgotten about that.
michalchik 1 year ago
@michalchik You're right !
IronWolfWood 1 year ago
@michalchik it's actually the Maclauren series...not Taylor...but Mac is a form on Taylor about 0 instead of a constant.... :)
GreenAms 1 year ago
@GreenAms Ah, I have to look over that again. Thanks for the reminder
michalchik 1 year ago
@michalchik i don't know....if you think about it trig substitutions in the context of the arclegnth formula are pretty intuitive
tatfr0guy 1 year ago
@michalchik trig sub is very very useful... with out it we wouldnt be able to integrate many things...
bmx391xmb 8 months ago
@michalchik I hate everything to do with summations lol, one bad calc prof ruined my chances with summations lol
reid300 3 months ago
gr8 vid, thx
phtmexplo 1 year ago
the first term of the taylor expansion shouldn't be primed right?
michalchik 2 years ago
This is the best mathematics instruction I have EVER experienced. Thanks!
balwit 2 years ago 3
To treenabalds,
It's because the second derivative of sinθ is -sinθ, it is EXCATLY zero when you plug θ=0.
That is, f''(0)=0.
And for cosθ, the first and third derivatives are EXCATLY zero when you plug θ=0. That is, f'(0) and f'''(0) are zero.
karsonson 2 years ago
Thank you, karsonson. It makes sense to me now.
treenabalds 2 years ago
Can anyone clarify why (at 48:01) he sets sin(θ) ≈ θ θ^3/6, leaving out the second degree term (θ^2/2) as it seems should have been next according to the Taylor expansion? He doesnt do that when setting cos(θ) ≈ 1 θ^2/2. I keep thinking about it but cant figure out what Im missing.
treenabalds 2 years ago
This prof is the man, seriously.
ginogrz 2 years ago 3
i feel better about not having mastered taylor expansions now...
dnm25 2 years ago
Agree with the previous comments. I'm amazed about how the people reacted to that. Nice!
Cactilio86 2 years ago
Hahaha!!!
Applause... Very nice!
CadeHerronETSU 2 years ago
I loved when the class applauded!
gregsabo 2 years ago 14
@gregsabo I do have wished to not know the end … sniff
ThePname 1 year ago