Added: 4 years ago
From: plunk502
Views: 971
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Oi could you see loads of cars in a straight line up the road?!? Guess what, they were desperate to go to work and so was my dad! That was actually really f**king rude blocking the entrance because that meant that all of the workers (including my dad) were late! You guys were just stuck up your own arses, you clearly didn't give a sh*t about the workers who work there at all! You should be ashamedof yourself, in that year (2007) I reckon that lots of the workers would have lost a lot of money

  • @RochelleK1994 i agree with this comment so much i recently joined the company as an apprentice at hunterston b power station and u dont realise that the people running the plant all through the night that were tired couldn't get out from work and the fresh workers couldnt get in you idiots dont you know how accidents happen its down to fatigue and not letting people from the night shift out is just stupid!!!!! get your bloody priorities right you hippies!!

  • @jambed2010 We are aware that workers often do 12hr shifts and we suspect that the Working Time Directive is often breached at nuclear power stations. We think that this is an important issue when it comes to safety at nuclear plants. However, we do not stop fresh workers getting into work since they can walk past our blockades. We do stop deliveries but this is not a safety issue.

    You should bring up the problem of long working hours and fatigue with your employers/union not us.

  • @plunk502 the working hours are within regulations i would know as i work for them! so what u think is definitely not true and leaving a line of cars about 132 long as thats the day shift numbers in a line on a designated fire safety road breeches a lot of HSE safety laws and it also means the fire safety response team cannot access the station quickly therefor a considerably larger risk also i would like to point out that nuclear is the future as it produces around 80% of the uk's power now.

  • @jambed2010 There has never been long lines of cars since we started contacting security when we blockade - since they used to take at least 15 minutes to notice. There is plenty of adequate parking space outside. If there was an incident at the site we would would remove the blockade to allow emergency vehicles through.

    Nuclear produces about 13% of our electricity supply which is 18% of our energy needs i.e. less than 3% of our power - you figure of 80% seems to be a bit out.

  • @plunk502 i think i know what the figures are! and how do you know so much if u dont work for them the only other way is if you get your information from a survey or an estimation then its wrong and it doesn't matter what your opinion is because britain is pro nuclear our company is making more profit than ever and with 14 new plants worldwide starting this year people will have to accept it.

  • @jambed2010 Figures are the Digest of UK Energy Statistics published by the DECC. I am not sure how many new connections from nuclear there will be this year - so far on one small (220MW) plant in India. What I am sure about is that the amount of new nuclear will be a lot smaller than the amount of new wind.

    What company do you work for? EDF would be bankrupt (£30billion debt) if it was not supported by the French Government.

  • @plunk502 its funded by the government because they know its the right step forward for the world and the new epr reactors are more modern and safer than ever! the chance of another accident is minimal and also in the new stations they have got new safety pits that even if a meltdown occurs it goes into its own containment unit and is completely harmless also i would like to point out that all the new wind farm projects are in edf's renewable sector so we are trying our best at renewable.

  • @jambed2010 The new reactors are not safe according to EDF! (see article on the Boycott EDF website ). If you think that the energy/CO2 question is about wind or nuclear you are wrong. Even with 20% of electricity from wind or nuclear it only accounts for 4% of our energy needs. What about transport, heating, industry which will continue to use oil and gas. Why not combine electricity production with heating - something called combined heat and power.

  • @plunk502 i have nothing more to say to you.

  • Can any of the people posting the insults provide any fact based arguments that Nuclear Power is the answer to climate change?

  • @plunk502 yup the fact it produces 0% co2 and no poisonous gasses and the waste is proof tested and robust tested for up to 20 million mega tonnes of pressure and up to 10 on the richter scale so its the way to go!

  • @jambed2010. 0% of what? CO2 emission from nuclear are at least 65g/KWhr - more than wind. How do you produce 20 million mega tonnes of pressure? Pressure is measured in force per unit area not mass. If you mean 2x10^13 Pa how did they produce that - inside an neutron star? Since 10 on a richter scale has never been observed how did they test it. It seems to me the pro-nuclear lobby are talking a load of crap again.

  • Yay lets lie on road and let people use more fuel in their cars (really good for environment) Who are these intelligent people ? Did they goto Uni (if they did my kids arent going LoL)

  • What is the answer to climate change then?? You motherfuckers are wasting your time being a pain in the arse when if you really cared you would do some research into alternative energy! You are just lazy pricks, let me guess? you are all on JSA?? I thought soo...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more